This Article Extract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gheorghiade, M. Articles by Colucci, W. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gheorghiade, M. Articles by Colucci, W. S. Related Collections Other heart failure AHA Statements and Guidelines

(Circulation. 2006;113:2556-2564.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.

Special Report

Contemporary Use of Digoxin in the Management of Cardiovascular Disorders

Mihai Gheorghiade, MD; Dirk J. van Veldhuisen, MD, PhD; Wilson S. Colucci, MD

From the Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (M.G.); University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (D.J.v.V.); and Division of Cardiology, Boston University, Boston, Mass (W.S.C.).

Correspondence to Mihai Gheorghiade, MD, Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Galter 10-240, 201 E Huron St, Chicago, IL 60611. E-mail m-gheorghiade{at}northwestern.edu

Key Words: digoxin • heart failure • atrial fibrillation

	Digoxin Use in Cardiovascular Medicine: Past and Present

Top Digoxin Use in Cardiovascular... Clinical Evidence Digoxin in Contemporary Heart... Atrial Fibrillation Practical Considerations for... Conclusions References

 
Digitalis is the oldest compound in cardiovascular medicine that continues to be used in contemporary clinical practice.¹ Evidence supporting the beneficial effects of digoxin on hemodynamic, neurohormonal, and electrophysiological parameters has been accumulated from >200 years of clinical experience and research (Table 1).²

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 1. Effects of Digoxin

Digoxin was approved for heart failure in 1998 under current regulations by the Food and Drug Administration on the basis of the Prospective Randomized Study of Ventricular Function and Efficacy of Digoxin (PROVED), Randomized Assessment of Digoxin on Inhibitors of the Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (RADIANCE), and Digitalis Investigators Group (DIG) clinical trials.^3–5 It was also approved for the control of ventricular response rate for patients with atrial fibrillation. The most recent American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines recommend digoxin for symptomatic chronic heart failure for patients with reduced systolic function (Class IIa recommendation: weight of evidence/opinion is in favor of usefulness/efficacy), preserved systolic function (Class IIb: usefulness/efficacy is less well established by evidence/opinion), and/or rate control for atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response (Class IIa).⁶ The new Heart Failure Society of America guidelines for heart failure provide similar recommendations.⁷

Despite its relatively recent approval by the Food and Drug Administration and the guideline recommendations, digoxin use is decreasing in patients with heart failure.⁸ In the Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure (OPTIMIZE-HF) registry, only 30% of patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction were being treated with digoxin before admission. Digoxin was added in only 8% of patients before discharge despite the fact that they had signs and symptoms of heart failure while receiving diuretics, ACE inhibitors, or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and ß-blockers.^9,10 This decrease in digoxin use is likely the result of several factors. Digoxin has not been promoted by the pharmaceutical industry and has received little attention at national and international meetings. This may have been the result of the development and introduction of life-saving therapies for heart failure, including ß-blockers, ARBs, aldosterone blockers, and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Safety concerns about digoxin therapy–increased mortality in women also may have contributed to this decrease in its use.^8,11

This update reevaluates the role of digoxin in the context of recent advances in heart failure therapy, provides practical recommendations for its use, and identifies areas for future research.

	Clinical Evidence

Top Digoxin Use in Cardiovascular... Clinical Evidence Digoxin in Contemporary Heart... Atrial Fibrillation Practical Considerations for... Conclusions References

 
Heart Failure
Digoxin possesses many characteristics of a beneficial drug for heart failure. It is the only oral inotrope that does not increase long-term mortality in chronic heart failure and has few side effects when dosed appropriately on the basis of serum concentration.² Digoxin does not lower blood pressure or adversely affect renal function or electrolytes.² Accordingly, it is easy to use in combination with other heart failure therapies, including ACE inhibitors or ARBs, ß-blockers, and aldosterone antagonists. Digoxin is a very low-cost drug. This last aspect is particularly important in developing countries where patients may not be able to afford branded products and device therapies.

Several clinical trials conducted with digoxin provide compelling evidence supporting its use in the treatment of symptomatic chronic heart failure.^2–5 PROVED was a 12-week placebo-controlled, digoxin-withdrawal study. This study enrolled patients in sinus rhythm with reduce systolic function and stable heart failure symptoms who were receiving digoxin and diuretics.³ Patients in whom digoxin was discontinued had a 2-fold increase in worsening heart failure and a decrease in both exercise capacity and LVEF compared with patients who continued on digoxin therapy.

The RADIANCE trial followed a similar protocol; however, patients were receiving ACE inhibitors in addition to diuretics and digoxin.⁴ Digoxin discontinuation was associated with a 6-fold increase in worsening heart failure, despite the fact that ACE inhibitors and diuretics were continued after its withdrawal. Functional capacity worsened in the withdrawal group, as did quality of life and ejection fraction (Table 2).^4,12

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 2. Effect of Digoxin in Patients in Sinus Rhythm With Stable Heart Failure and Reduced Systolic Function Receiving Diuretics (PROVED Study) or Diuretics and ACE Inhibitors (RADIANCE Study)

A pooled analysis of the RADIANCE and PROVED trials suggested that triple therapy with digoxin, an ACE inhibitor, and a diuretic was associated with the lowest risk of worsening heart failure (<5%). The rate of worsening heart failure was 19% among patients treated with digoxin and diuretics, 25% among patients receiving ACE inhibitors and diuretics, and 39% among patients receiving diuretics alone (Figure 1).¹³ In the separate analysis of the same database, a significant cost reduction related to hospitalizations was associated with digoxin therapy.¹⁴

View larger version (26K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Superiority of triple drug therapy (ACE inhibitor+digoxin+diuretics) in PROVED and RADIANCE. *P<0.01 vs all other groups. Data derived from Young et al.13

The DIG trial was a large, relatively simple NIH-sponsored trial designed to evaluate mortality in patients in sinus rhythm with reduced (DIG-Main) or preserved (DIG-Ancillary) systolic function.^5,15 The study randomized 7788 patients. Patients were treated with ACE inhibitors and diuretics and were followed up for 3 years. The DIG main study included 6800 patients with an LVEF of <45%. Although digoxin did not reduce overall mortality, it did reduce heart failure–related death or hospitalization (Figure 2).⁵ Although this was not a prespecified outcome, deaths presumed to result from arrhythmia without evidence of worsening heart failure and from atherosclerotic coronary disease were apparently higher (15% versus 13%) in the digoxin group compared with placebo. At a 2-year follow-up, a reduction in total mortality and total hospitalization was demonstrated in a prespecified subgroup analysis of patients with an LVEF <25%, cardiothoracic ratio >55%, or NYHA class III/IV symptoms. In these subgroups, the relative reduction in heart failure mortality or heart failure–related hospitalization was 39% for patients with LVEF <25%, 35% for patients with cardiothoracic ratio >55% on chest x-ray, and/or 35% for patients with severe symptoms (Figure 3).^5,16 The use of new or increasing doses of existing medications and/or open-label digoxin for worsening heart failure was greater in the placebo group. In this trial, 50% of patients were taking digoxin for the first time. Although this group had a much lower mortality, the magnitude of clinical improvement was similar compared with patients taking digoxin before randomization. During the study period, the proportion of patients hospitalized for digoxin intoxication was 2% in the digoxin compared with 0.9% in the placebo group.

View larger version (18K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Incidence of death or rehospitalization for digoxin versus placebo in the DIG trial. Reprinted with permission from The New England Journal of Medicine.5 Copyright 1997 Massachusetts Medical Society.

View larger version (29K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Effect of digoxin in high-risk subgroups after 2 years of follow-up in the DIG trial. Data derived from the Digitalis Investigation Group.5

Serum Concentration
The DIG trial did not show a reduction in all-cause mortality in patients treated with digoxin. Patients received doses to achieve SDC in the range of 0.5 to 2 ng/mL.^5,15 Thus, some patients achieved SDCs higher than is currently recommended (0.5 to 0.9 ng/mL).⁷ Several analyses suggest that the benefits of digoxin can be obtained with doses resulting in SDCs of <1 ng/mL.^16–20

The benefits from digoxin may be related not only to its hemodynamic effects but also to its ability to improve the neurohormonal profile.² Improvements in neurohormonal profile and hemodynamics occur at low digoxin doses, and increasing the dose does not always result in further improvements in these measures.^17–19 In the PROVED and RADIANCE studies, the clinical benefits were similar in patients with lower (serum concentration <1 ng/mL) and higher SDCs.²⁰ A recent comprehensive post hoc analysis of the DIG trial that included all patients (preserved or reduced systolic function) suggested a survival benefit for patients with SDCs <1.0 ng/mL (Figure 4).¹⁶ Heart failure hospitalizations were reduced regardless of SDC.¹⁶ However, it should be emphasized that those findings are retrospective in nature and should be confirmed by prospective studies. Evaluated collectively, the available data suggest that higher digoxin doses resulting in serum concentrations that were considered therapeutic in the past (between 1 and 2 ng/mL) are not associated with further improvement in hemodynamics or neurohormones and may actually increase mortality. In contrast, digoxin dosed to achieve SDCs in the range of 0.5 to 0.9 ng/mL appears to be safe; improves left ventricular function, hemodynamics, and neurohormonal profiles; reduces hospitalization; and possibly improves survival.^16–20

View larger version (25K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. Mortality and hospitalization rates adjusted for multiple baseline variables in the DIG trial at 2 years in patients with a serum digoxin concentration of 0.5 to 0.9 ng/mL and >1 ng/mL. Data derived from Ahmed et al.16

Digoxin in Women
Digoxin has not been well studied in women with heart failure even though they represent >50% of all admissions for this condition.¹⁰ In the DIG trial, women made up only 22% of the study population. One post hoc analysis of the DIG database suggested that women randomized to digoxin had increased all-cause mortality.¹¹ However, subsequent independent analyses of the same database showed no evidence of increased mortality in women with a serum concentration <1.0 ng/mL.²¹ A higher risk of mortality (but not hospitalization) was observed only in women with SDCs >1 ng/mL.²¹ An analysis of patients treated with digoxin in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) database also failed to demonstrate a survival difference based on gender.²²

Digoxin in the Elderly
The incidence and prevalence of heart failure increase progressively with age. The mean age of patients hospitalized with heart failure is 75 years.^9,10 Advanced age may predispose patients to an increased risk for digoxin intoxication that is related to decreased renal function, low lean body mass, and electrical conduction abnormalities.² In the DIG trial, however, advanced age was not associated with an increased risk of digoxin intoxication.²³ The beneficial effects of digoxin were found to be similar across all age groups regardless of LVEF.²³ These findings demonstrate that digoxin remains a useful agent in elderly heart failure patients when variables such as lean body mass and renal function are taken into account.

Preserved Systolic Function
Approximately 50% of patients hospitalized for acute heart failure syndromes have relatively preserved systolic function.^9,10,24,25 These patients are older and more likely to have a history of hypertension and atrial fibrillation.^9,24 To date, only 2 relatively large studies have been conducted in heart failure patients with preserved systolic function: DIG-Ancillary and Effects of Candesartan in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Preserved Left-Ventricular Ejection Fraction or (CHARM-Preserved study). The effect of digoxin in 988 patients with heart failure and preserved systolic function (mean LVEF, 55%) was examined in the ancillary component of the DIG trial.^5,26 The addition of digoxin to ACE inhibitors and diuretics resulted in a nonsignificant 12% reduction in heart failure mortality or heart failure hospitalizations.²⁶ The direction and magnitude of this finding are similar to that observed in patients with decreased systolic function.⁵ In comparison, in CHARM-Preserved, therapy with candesartan resulted in an 11% relative risk reduction in cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization in patients with heart failure and preserved systolic function. In this trial, however, patients randomized to candesartan developed more hypotension, worsening renal function, and hypokalemia compared with the placebo group.²⁷

Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Hospitalizations for worsening heart failure are a major problem in the United States, with almost 1 million hospitalizations occurring annually.²⁴ This is associated with a readmission rate as high as 30% within 2 months after discharge.^24,25 To date, no single agent used to improve presenting symptoms has been shown to be safe and effective.²⁴ These include nesiritide, milrinone, tezosentan, and levosimendan.^25,28–30 The effects of intravenous digoxin, alone or in combination with other vasodilators, are seen within an hour of its administration and result in increased cardiac output, decreased pulmonary wedge pressure, increased ejection fraction, and improved neurohormonal profile without changes in blood pressure.^31,32 This therapy may be continued during hospitalization and after discharge. Despite its potential benefits, no study to date has evaluated digoxin in the setting of acute heart failure. Accordingly, digoxin is not recommended for the management of acute heart failure syndromes by the ACC/AHA heart failure guidelines.⁶ However, given its acute positive hemodynamic effects and long-term safety data, digoxin should be evaluated in this setting by future trials.

Coronary Artery Disease
Myocardial ischemia may cause inhibition of the sodium-potassium pump, rendering myocardial tissue more sensitive to the arrhythmogenic effects of digitalis, even at lower doses.² In a retrospective analysis, digoxin has been associated with an increase in postdischarge mortality in patients surviving myocardial infarction.² However, in other studies, regression analysis failed to show that digoxin is an independent predictor of increased mortality. In the DIG trial, 70% of patients had ischemic heart disease, 65% had a history of myocardial infarction, and 30% had angina at the time of enrollment. Patients with an ischemic origin had a reduction in heart failure–related death or hospitalization similar to that seen in nonischemic patients.⁵ The DIG trial, however, did not examine the effects of digoxin in the settings of acute coronary syndromes. Because its safety has not been evaluated in this setting, digoxin should be avoided if possible during acute myocardial infarction or in patients with ongoing ischemia.

	Digoxin in Contemporary Heart Failure Management

Top Digoxin Use in Cardiovascular... Clinical Evidence Digoxin in Contemporary Heart... Atrial Fibrillation Practical Considerations for... Conclusions References

 
Digoxin Discontinuation
The recent ACC/AHA guidelines suggest that if a patient is taking digoxin but not ACE inhibitors or ß-blockers, treatment with digoxin should not be withdrawn, but appropriate therapy with the neurohormonal antagonists should be instituted.⁶ The RADIANCE and PROVE studies showed a significant rate of clinical deterioration when digoxin was discontinued in stable patients with heart failure and a reduced systolic function in patients who were not taking a ß-blocker.^3,4 Digoxin may be discontinued, however, in patients who no longer have symptoms of heart failure, are in sinus rhythm, and have a significant improvement in systolic function while receiving ACE inhibitors and ß-blocker.

Non–Potassium-Sparing Diuretics
Retrospective analyses suggest that chronic use of non–potassium-sparing diuretics may be harmful in heart failure, particularly when higher doses are used for worsening symptoms.^33,34 Because digoxin improves heart failure symptoms, its use may reduce the need for increased doses of non–potassium-sparing diuretics.⁵ In the DIG trial, patients randomized to digoxin were less likely to need cointerventions, including increased doses of diuretics for worsening heart failure.^5,16,26

ß-Blocker Therapy
The DIG study was conducted before ß-blockers were proved conclusively to reduce mortality and morbidity in heart failure. Most patients enrolled in trials of ß-blockers, however, were receiving digoxin (Table 3). It is not known if the findings of ß-blocker trials would have been similar without background digoxin therapy. Data from the US Carvedilol Trial and Australia/New Zealand Trial suggest a similar reduction in mortality and hospitalization in patients treated with the combination of digoxin and carvedilol compared with either drug alone.³⁵

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 3. Digoxin as Background Therapy in Heart Failure Trials

Pharmacological rationale exists for combining ß-blocker and digoxin therapy. Ejection fraction may decline initially during ß-blocker initiation.³⁶ Digoxin improves hemodynamics and ejection fraction within hours of its administration.^31,32 Digoxin may potentially prevent worsening hemodynamics during initiation of ß-blocker therapy in patients with severe heart failure. Despite those theoretical considerations, the value of adding digoxin in patients already receiving a ß-blocker for heart failure has not been well studied.

Aldosterone Antagonists
Aldosterone antagonists improve survival in patients with severe heart failure and reduced systolic function.³⁷ Subgroup analyses have shown that this mortality benefit is particularly evident in patients receiving digoxin therapy.³⁷ Therefore, in severe heart failure, digoxin should be considered as an addition to aldosterone antagonists. It should be recognized that the benefits of aldosterone antagonists in mild to moderate heart failure or preserved systolic function have not been studied. These agents should not be used in patients with a serum creatinine >2.5 mg/dL or serum potassium >5.0 mEq/L.³⁸

Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Addition to ACE Inhibitors
The addition of ARB therapy to ACE inhibitors in heart failure and reduced systolic function does not appear to reduce mortality but has been associated with a decreased rate of worsening heart failure.^39,40 In the CHARM-Added trial, the addition of candesartan to an ACE inhibitor resulted in a 15% reduction in the risk of CV death or heart failure hospitalization.⁴⁰ In this trial, 23 patients had to be treated with candesartan to keep 1 patient from cardiovascular death or hospitalization. Therapy with candesartan was associated with an increased incidence of hypotension, worsening renal function, and hyperkalemia.⁴⁰ In comparison, in the main DIG trial, the addition of digoxin to an ACE inhibitor decreased heart failure mortality or heart failure hospitalization by 24%. Fourteen patients had to be treated with digoxin to prevent 1 such event. Accordingly, the addition of digoxin to ACE inhibitor therapy for symptomatic heart failure, rather than the addition of an ARB, may be associated with a greater benefit and lower risk of side effects.^5,40

Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators have been shown to reduce mortality in patients with heart failure and reduced systolic function.⁴¹ As a result, these patients are more likely to live longer and to die from worsening heart failure rather than sudden cardiac death. The role of digoxin in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator has not been studied.

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
CRT reduces mortality and morbidity in patients with severe heart failure symptoms, reduced systolic function, and wide-QRS complex.⁴² Given that severe symptoms are the main indication for CRT therapy, digoxin therapy may be considered after CRT if symptoms persist.

	Atrial Fibrillation

Top Digoxin Use in Cardiovascular... Clinical Evidence Digoxin in Contemporary Heart... Atrial Fibrillation Practical Considerations for... Conclusions References

 
Atrial fibrillation is present in 30% of heart failure patients.²⁴ At rest, digoxin can effectively control the ventricular response in atrial fibrillation by enhancing vagal tone.² However, it may be less effective at controlling the ventricular response during exercise or in the setting of enhanced sympathetic tone.⁴³

In patients with heart failure and reduced systolic function, the combination of digoxin and a ß-blocker reduces symptoms, improves ventricular function, and leads to better rate control than either agent alone.^44,45 The best strategy for rate control is a 2-drug combination, usually consisting of digoxin and a ß-blocker. Using a ß-blocker and digoxin in combination allows lower doses to be used, thus improving tolerability and decreasing the risk of toxicity.^44,46 Diltiazem and verapamil also are options, but these agents should not be used in the setting of systolic dysfunction. Caution should be used when combination therapy with digoxin and amiodarone is chosen for rate control because amiodarone can significantly increase SDC.²

	Practical Considerations for Digoxin

Top Digoxin Use in Cardiovascular... Clinical Evidence Digoxin in Contemporary Heart... Atrial Fibrillation Practical Considerations for... Conclusions References

 
Indications and Contraindications
Digoxin is indicated for the treatment of symptomatic heart failure and for the control of ventricular response in patients with atrial fibrillation (Table 4). It should generally be avoided in patients with sinus node disease, second- or third-degree AV block, accessory AV pathways (Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome), cardiac amyloidosis, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Digoxin should be used cautiously and with appropriate monitoring in patients with renal impairment, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, and hypothyroidism because these patients may be at higher risk of digoxin intoxication. It also should be used cautiously or not at all in patients with acute myocardial infarction or ongoing ischemia and in those undergoing electrical cardioversion.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 4. Practical Considerations for the Use of Digoxin

Dosing Guidelines
Most heart failure patients achieve a serum concentration of 0.5 to 1.0 ng/mL with doses of 0.125 to 0.25 mg/d. However, SDC is determined by digoxin dose, age, gender, kidney function, use of diuretics, and/or use of concomitant drugs that are known to alter the SDC (eg, amiodarone).¹⁶ Thus, these factors should be taken into account when digoxin is prescribed. It may be recommended that adult men with clinically stable heart failure and normal renal function be prescribed a daily digoxin dose of 0.25 mg to achieve a therapeutic SDC <1 ng/mL. In heart failure patients who are elderly, are female, or have renal impairment, a daily dose of 0.125 mg would be more appropriate. For patients with multiple risk factors for high SDC, such as an elderly woman with impaired renal function, digoxin should be started at a daily dose of 0.0625 mg. Loading doses are unnecessary when digoxin is used to treat chronic heart failure. For atrial fibrillation, a loading dose of 0.5 to 0.75 mg, followed by a maintenance dose, is warranted when the rate is not controlled with ß-blockers. To achieve chronic optimal rate control, ß-blocker dose rather than digoxin dose should be adjusted. Intravenous digoxin should be used rarely, if at all.

Monitoring Serum Digoxin Concentration
Serum digoxin concentrations should be monitored to guide therapy in patients at high risk for developing digoxin intoxication (Table 4). An SDC should be obtained 14 to 21 days after therapy initiation. The half-life of digoxin is 2 days in patients with normal renal function and is prolonged to 4 to 7 days in patients with renal failure. Sampling for digoxin concentrations should be performed no sooner than 8 hours after the last dose. Samples obtained before this time period will reflect the distribution phase of digoxin, and they are inaccurate for clinical decision making. Once a steady-state digoxin concentration has been obtained, repeated measurements are not necessary unless the patient’s renal function changes, an interacting drug is added or removed, or a patient experiences substantial weight loss. Table 5 outlines the indications and procedures for measuring digoxin concentrations.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 5. Causes of Altered Responsiveness to Digoxin

Drug Interactions
Several drugs interact with digoxin (Table 6). Patients receiving these drugs may need to have the digoxin dose adjusted.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 6. Drug Interactions With Digoxin

Digoxin Intoxication
Cardiac manifestations of digoxin intoxication include sinoatrial block, AV block, ventricular bigeminy, tachycardia, and ventricular fibrillation. Noncardiac signs of digoxin toxicity include nausea, vomiting, visual disturbances, confusion, and severe hyperkalemia. If an elevated SDC is detected in the absence of symptoms, the time that the laboratory sample was obtained should be verified. If the sample was obtained <6 hours after the last dose of digoxin, then the level may represent the distribution phase of digoxin. If the elevated SDC is thought to reflect digoxin intoxication, digoxin should be discontinued. Hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia also should be corrected. Intravenous calcium is contraindicated because it may precipitate life-threatening arrhythmias. In addition, other drugs that increase SDC or potentiate its effects also should be discontinued.

Asymptomatic bradyarrhythmias should be closely monitored. Symptomatic patients with bradyarrhythmias should receive atropine. Patients with life-threatening arrhythmias should be given purified antidigoxin Fab fragments from digoxin-specific antisera (DIGIBIND). Once DIGIBIND is administered, SDCs should not be obtained until DIGIBIND has been cleared from the body. Patients presenting with severe hyperkalemia as a result of digoxin intoxication should undergo dialysis. Factors that may have contributed to intoxication (worsening renal function, drug interactions, etc) should be considered before therapy is reinitiated.

	Conclusions

Top Digoxin Use in Cardiovascular... Clinical Evidence Digoxin in Contemporary Heart... Atrial Fibrillation Practical Considerations for... Conclusions References

 
Digoxin reduces hospitalizations in patients with chronic heart failure. When combined with ß-blockers, it remains a useful agent to achieve rate control in atrial fibrillation. Although digoxin should not be used instead of other heart failure medications with proven mortality benefits, it should be considered an adjunct in all patients with symptomatic heart failure, particularly when heart failure is severe or atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response is present. It is safe and well tolerated when dosed appropriately. It is inexpensive and can be afforded by most patients with heart failure throughout the world.

	Acknowledgments

 
This manuscript is dedicated to the memory of Drs Richard Gorlin and Thomas Smith, who were instrumental in clarifying the role of digoxin in clinical practice. The authors had full access to the data and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.

Disclosures

None.

	Footnotes

 
Guest Editor for this article was Judith S. Hochman, MD.

	References

Top Digoxin Use in Cardiovascular... Clinical Evidence Digoxin in Contemporary Heart... Atrial Fibrillation Practical Considerations for... Conclusions References

 
1. Withering W. An account of the foxglove and some of its medical uses with practical remarks on dropsy and other diseases. In: Willins FA, Keys TE, eds. Classics of Cardiology. New York, NY: Henry Schyuman, Dover Publications; 1941; 1: 231–252.

2. Eichhorn EJ, Gheorghiade M. Digoxin. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2002; 44: 251–266.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Uretsky BF, Young JB, Shahidi FE, Yellen LG, Harrison MC, Jolly MK. Randomized study assessing the effect of digoxin withdrawal in patients with mild to moderate chronic congestive heart failure: results of the PROVED trial: PROVED Investigative Group. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 22: 955–962.[Abstract]

4. Packer M, Gheorghiade M, Young JB, Costantini PJ, Adams KF, Cody RJ, Smith LK, Van VL, Gourley LA, Jolly MK, for the RADIANCE Study. Withdrawal of digoxin from patients with chronic heart failure treated with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: RADIANCE Study. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329: 1–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Digitalis Investigation Group. The effect of digoxin on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure: the Digitalis Investigation Group. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336: 525–533.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, Feldman AM, Francis GS, Ganiats TG, Jessup M, Konstam MA, Mancini DM, Michl K, Oates JA, Rahko PS, Silver MA, Stevenson LW, Yancy CW, Antman EM, Smith SC Jr, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Jacobs AK, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B, for the American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American College of Chest Physicians, International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, and Heart Rhythm Society. ACC/AHA 2005 guideline update for the diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure): developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians and the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2005; 112: e154–e235.[Free Full Text]

7. Adams JF, Lindenfield JA, Arnold JM, Baker D, Barnard DH, Baughman KL, Boehmer JP, Deedwania P, Dumbar SB, Elkayam U, Gheorghiade M, Howlett JG, Konstam MA, Kronenberg MW, Massie BM, Mehra M, Miller AB, Moser DK, Patterson JK, Rodeheffer RJ, Sackner-Bernstein J, Silver MA, Starling RC, Stevenson LW, Wagoner LE. Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA) 2006 comprehensive heart failure practice guidelines. J Card Fail. 2006; 12: 10–36.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Brophy JM. Rehabilitating digoxin. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27: 127–129.[Free Full Text]

9. Fonarow GC, Abraham WT, Albert NM, Gattis WA, Gheorghiade M, Greenberg B, O’Connor CM, Yancy CW, Young J. Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure (OPTIMIZE-HF): rationale and design. Am Heart J. 2004; 148: 43–51.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Fonarow GC, Abraham WT, Albert NM, Gattis WA, Gheorghiade M, Greenberg B, O’Connor CM, She L, Yancy CW, Young JB Impact of evidence-based heart failure therapy use at hospital discharge on treatment rates during follow-up: a report from the Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure (OPTIMIZE-HF). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45: 345A. Abstract.

11. Rathore SS. Wang Y, Krumholz HM. Sex-based differences in the effect of digoxin for the treatment of heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 1403–1411.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Tauke J, Goldstein S, Gheorghiade M. Digoxin for chronic heart failure: a review of the randomized controlled trials with special attention to the PROVED (Prospective Randomized Study of Ventricular Failure and the Efficacy of Digoxin) and RADIANCE (Randomized Assessment of Digoxin on Inhibitors of the angiotensin Converting Enzyme) trials. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1994; 37: 49–58.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Young JB, Gheorghiade M, Uretsky BF, Patterson JH, Adams KF Jr. Superiority of "triple" drug therapy in heart failure: insights from the PROVED and RADIANCE trials: Prospective Randomized Study of Ventricular Function and Efficacy of Digoxin, Randomized Assessment of Digoxin and Inhibitors of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 32: 686–692.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Ward RE, Gheorghiade M, Young JB, Uretsky B. Economic outcomes of withdrawal of digoxin therapy in adult patients with stable congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 26: 93–101.[Abstract]

15. Digitalis Investigation Group. Rationale, design, implementation, and baseline characteristics of patients in the DIG trial: a large, simple, long-term trial to evaluate the effect of digitalis on mortality in heart failure. Control Clin Trials. 1996; 17: 77–97.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Ahmed A, Rich MW, Love TE, Lloyd-Jones DM, Aban IB, Colucci WS, Adams KF, Gheorghiade M. Digoxin and reduction in mortality and hospitalization in heart failure: a comprehensive post hoc analysis of the DIG trial. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27: 178–186.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Newton GE, Tong JH, Schofield AM, Baines AD, Floras JS, Parker JD. Digoxin reduces cardiac sympathetic activity in severe congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996; 28: 155–161.[Abstract]

18. Gheorghiade M, Hall VB, Jacobsen G, Alam M, Rosman H, Goldstein S. Effects of increasing maintenance dose of digoxin on left ventricular function and neurohormones in patients with chronic heart failure treated with diuretics and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Circulation. 1995; 92: 1801–1807.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Slatton ML, Irani WN, Hall SA, Marcoux LG, Page RL, Grayburn PA, Eichhorn EJ. Does digoxin provide additional hemodynamic and autonomic benefit at higher doses in patients with mild to moderate heart failure and normal sinus rhythm? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 29: 1206–1213.[Abstract]

20. Adams KF Jr, Gheorghiade M, Uretsky BF, Patterson JH, Schwartz TA, Young JB. Clinical benefits of low serum digoxin concentrations in heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39: 946–953.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Adams KF, Jr., Patterson JH, Gattis WA, O’Connor CM, Lee CR, Schwartz TA, Gheorghiade M. Relationship of serum digoxin concentration to mortality and morbidity in women in the digitalis investigation group trial: a retrospective analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46: 497–504.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Domanski M, Fleg J, Bristow M, Knox S. The effect of gender on outcome in digitalis-treated heart failure patients. J Card Fail. 2005; 11: 83–86.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Rich MW, McSherry F, Williford WO, Yusuf S. Effect of age on mortality, hospitalizations and response to digoxin in patients with heart failure: the DIG study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38: 806–813.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Adams KF, Jr., Fonarow GC, Emerman CL, LeJemtel TH, Costanzo MR, Abraham WT, Berkowitz RL, Galvao M, Horton DP, for the ADHERE Scientific Advisory Committee and Investigators. Characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized for heart failure in the United States: rationale, design, and preliminary observations from the first 100,000 cases in the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE). Am Heart J. 2005; 149: 209–216.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Gheorghiade M, Zannad F, Sopko G, Klein L, Pina IL, Konstam MA, Massie BM, Roland E, Targum S, Collins SP, Filippatos G, Tavazzi L, for the International Working Group on Acute Heart Failure Syndromes. Acute heart failure syndromes: current state and framework for future research. Circulation. 2005; 112: 3958–3968.[Free Full Text]

26. Ahmed A, Rich MW, Fleg JL, Zile MR, Young JB, Kitzman DW, Love TE, Aronow WS, Adams FK Jr, Gheorghiade M. Effects of digoxin on morbidity and mortality in diastolic heart failure: the Ancillary Digitalis Investigation Group Trial. Circulation. In press.

27. Yusuf S, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, Granger CB, Held P, McMurray JJ, Michelson EL, Olofsson B, Ostergren J, for the CHARM Investigators and Committees. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction: the CHARM-Preserved Trial. Lancet. 2003; 362: 777–781.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Cuffe MS, Califf RM, Adams KF Jr, Benza R, Bourge R, Colucci WS, Massie BM, O’Connor CM, Pina I, Quigg R, Silver MA, Gheorghiade M. Outcomes of a Prospective Trial of Intravenous Milrinone for Exacerbations of Chronic Heart Failure (OPTIME-CHF) Investigators. JAMA. 2002; 287: 1541–1547.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Sackner-Bernstein JD, Kowalski M, Fox M, Aaronson K. Short-term risk of death after treatment with nesiritide for decompensated heart failure: a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2005; 293: 1900–1905.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Teerlink JR Overview of randomized clinical trials in acute heart failure syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 2005; 96: 59G–67G.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Gheorghiade M, Hall V, Lakier JB, Goldstein S. Comparative hemodynamic and neurohormonal effects of intravenous captopril and digoxin and their combinations in patients with severe heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989; 13: 134–142.[Abstract]

32. Tisdale JE, Gheorghiade M. Acute hemodynamic effects of digoxin alone or in combination with other vasoactive agents in patients with congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 1992; 69: 34G–47G.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Domanski M, Norman J, Pitt B, Haigney M, Hanlon S, Peyster E, for the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction. Diuretic use, progressive heart failure, and death in patients in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 42: 705–708.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Hasselblad V, Stough WG, Shah MR, Lokhnygina Y, Burnett JC, Gheorghiade M, Rayburn BK, Adams KF Jr, Francis GS, Califf RM. Relation between diuretic dose and outcome in a heart failure population: results of the ESCAPE trial. J Card Fail. 2005; 11: S157. Abstract.

35. Eichhorn EJ, Lukas MA, Wu B, Shusterman N. Effect of concomitant digoxin and carvedilol therapy on mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2000; 86: 1032–1035.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

36. Hall SA, Cigarroa CG, Marcoux, L Risser RC, Grayburn PA, Eichhorn EJ. Time course of improvement in left ventricular function, mass and geometry in patients with congestive heart failure treated with beta-adrenergic blockade. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 25: 1154–1161.[Abstract]

37. Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ, Cody R, Castaigne A, Perez A, Palensky J, Wittes J. The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure: Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341: 709–717.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Juurlink DN, Mamdani MM, Lee DS, Kopp A, Austin PC, Laupacis A, Redelmeier DA. Rates of hyperkalemia after publication of the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 543–551.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Cohn JN, Tognoni G, for the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial Investigators. A randomized trial of the angiotensin-receptor blocker valsartan in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 1667–1675.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. McMurray JJ, Ostergren J, Swedberg K, Granger CB, Held P, Michelson EL, Olofsson B, Yusuf S, Pfeffer MA, for the CHARM Investigators and Committees. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function taking angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Added trial. Lancet. 2003; 362: 767–771.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

41. Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, Poole JE, Packer DL, Boineau R, Domanski M, Troutman C, Anderson J, Johnson G, McNulty SE, Clapp-Channing N, Davidson-Ray LD, Fraulo ES, Fishbein DP, Luceri RM, Ip JH, for the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT) Investigators. Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 225–237.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Cleland JG, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, Freemantle N, Gras D, Kappenberger L, Tavazzi L, for the Cardiac Resynchronization-Heart Failure (CARE-HF) Study Investigators. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 1539–1549.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

43. Zarowitz BJ, Gheorghiade M. Optimal heart rate control for patients with chronic atrial fibrillation: are pharmacologic choices truly changing? Am Heart J. 1992; 123: 1401–1403.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

44. Khand AU, Rankin AC, Martin W, Taylor J, Gemmell I, Cleland JG. Carvedilol alone or in combination with digoxin for the management of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 42: 1944–1951.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

45. Veloso HH, de Paola AA. Beta-blockers versus digoxin to control ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45: 1905–1906.[Free Full Text]

46. Gheorghiade M, Adams KF Jr, Colucci WS. Digoxin in the management of cardiovascular disorders. Circulation. 2004; 109: 2959–2964.[Free Full Text]

47. Packer M, Bristow MR, Cohn JN, Colucci WS, Fowler MB, Gilbert EM, Shusterman NH. The effect of carvedilol on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure: US Carvedilol Heart Failure Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334: 1349–1355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

48. Packer M, Coats AJ, Fowler MB, Katus HA, Krum H, Mohacsi P, Rouleau JL, Tendera M, Castaigne A, Roecker EB, Schultz MK, DeMets DL, for the Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival Study Group. Effect of carvedilol on survival in severe chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 1651–1658.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

49. Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure: Metoprolol CR/XL Randomised Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF). Lancet. 1999; 353: 2001–2007.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

50. The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II (CIBIS-II): a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999; 353: 9–13.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Triposkiadis, G. Karayannis, G. Giamouzis, J. Skoularigis, G. Louridas, and J. Butler The sympathetic nervous system in heart failure physiology, pathophysiology, and clinical implications. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 3, 2009; 54(19): 1747 - 1762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. V. Fedorova, V. Raju, N. El-Okdi, A. Shidyak, D. J. Kennedy, S. Vetteth, D. R. Giovannucci, A. Y. Bagrov, O. V. Fedorova, J. I. Shapiro, et al. The cardiotonic steroid hormone marinobufagenin induces renal fibrosis: implication of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2009; 296(4): F922 - F934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Gheorghiade and P. S. Pang Acute heart failure syndromes. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 17, 2009; 53(7): 557 - 573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. P. Blaustein, J. Zhang, L. Chen, H. Song, H. Raina, S. P. Kinsey, M. Izuka, T. Iwamoto, M. I. Kotlikoff, J. B. Lingrel, et al. The Pump, the Exchanger, and Endogenous Ouabain: Signaling Mechanisms That Link Salt Retention to Hypertension Hypertension, February 1, 2009; 53(2): 291 - 298. [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. M. Albert Improving Medication Adherence in Chronic Cardiovascular Disease Crit. Care Nurse, October 1, 2008; 28(5): 54 - 64. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Newman, P. Yang, A. D. Pawlus, and K. I. Block Cardiac Glycosides as Novel Cancer Therapeutic Agents Mol. Interv., February 1, 2008; 8(1): 36 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Liu, X. Zhao, S. V. Pierre, and A. Askari Association of PI3K-Akt signaling pathway with digitalis-induced hypertrophy of cardiac myocytes Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): C1489 - C1497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y.-L. He, R. Sabo, G. Sunkara, M.-N. Bizot, G.-J. Riviere, S. Leon, M. Ligueros-Saylan, W. P. Dole, and D. Howard Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Vildagliptin and Digoxin in Healthy Volunteers J. Clin. Pharmacol., August 1, 2007; 47(8): 998 - 1004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Extract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gheorghiade, M. Articles by Colucci, W. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gheorghiade, M. Articles by Colucci, W. S. Related Collections Other heart failure AHA Statements and Guidelines