| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2006;113:e25.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Correspondence |
Divisions of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass
Divisions of Pulmonary/Critical Care Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass
Division of Cardiology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif
We read with interest the work by Brueckmann et al1 regarding the association between elevated N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and mortality in patients with bacterial sepsis. We previously published a similar relationship between BNP and mortality in subjects with shock of various types2 and found results of BNP testing to be strongly related to mortality in shock independently of measures of disease severity (Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] II scoring) or cardiac hemodynamics and filling pressures.
In the study by Brueckmann and colleagues, other than serum creatinine measurement, it appears that measures of disease severity such as APACHE II scoring were not included in the development of their Cox regression model. Was NT-proBNP a significant predictor of death in the presence of APACHE II scores? In addition, we note that 35% of subjects in their study demonstrated an ejection fraction of <50% and that these subjects accounted for the majority of those dying in the study. Presumably, most marked elevations of NT-proBNP would have been observed in those with impaired LV function. Was the presence of left ventricular dysfunction considered in the development of the Cox model?
Finally, the authors refer to NT-proBNP values in terms of pmol/L. This is not likely to be appropriate because it is not known whether the assays for NT-proBNP are entirely specific for the 76amino acid NT-proBNP moiety, with a high likelihood that small amounts of intact proBNP108 (the intracellular precleavage precursor to BNP and NT-proBNP) are detected and measured by these assays. Given the differences in molecular weight between NT-proBNP and proBNP108, reporting results as a function of molarity is not likely to be accurate; per recent consensus,3 the more appropriate method is to report in pg/mL (which results in NT-proBNP values 8.457 times higher than pmol/L).
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Faculty of Clinical Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Clinic Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany
Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital, Bonn, Germany
We appreciate the interest of Dr Januzzi and colleagues in our article.1 Inspired by their comments, we performed additional statistical evaluation, including Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores in the Cox proportional-hazards regression model. Similar to the study of Tung et al,2 N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels in our study were independent predictors of mortality even after controlling for disease severity. Because of the limited number of patients, the Cox regression should not be overcharged by the inclusion of too many variables. Hence, we did not add cardiac index, left ventricular stroke work index, and ejection fraction to the model. Statistical reevaluation of our data revealed that APACHE II scores do not add significantly to the prediction of mortality in the presence of NT-proBNP.
We agree that several different fragments of the proBNP precursor may be present in human circulation in as-yet-unknown amounts.3 Fragments 8 to 29, 31 to 57, and 1 to 76 and the whole proBNP1 108 precursor have been described. For this study a competitive ELISA with an antibody directed against amino acids 8 to 29 of the human BNP precursor from Biozol-Biomedica was used, with a high likelihood of detecting split products and the intact proBNP1 108 precursor. Calibration of this assay was performed with synthetic peptide829 (molecular weight, 2399g/mol), resulting in the following conversion factor: 1 pmol/L=2.399 pg/mL. The usefulness of this assay has been confirmed by several studies.4 Stating values in pg/mL or pmol/L depends on the assay type and the epitope actually detected. Although the National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry consensus concerning the units of natriuretic peptides is just in the state of recommendation, we are in accordance with Dr Januzzi to report uniformly in pg/mL to make results more comparable in future trials.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |