Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2006;113:2221-2228
Published online before print May 1, 2006, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.599241
CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
113/18/2221    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.105.599241v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castro, L. R.V.
Right arrow Articles by Fischmeister, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Castro, L. R.V.
Right arrow Articles by Fischmeister, R.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*Nucleotide
*Protein*UniGene
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Biochemistry and metabolism
Right arrow Other myocardial biology
Right arrow Animal models of human disease

(Circulation. 2006;113:2221-2228.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Molecular Cardiology

Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate Compartmentation in Rat Cardiac Myocytes

Liliana R.V. Castro, MS; Ignacio Verde, PhD; Dermot M.F. Cooper, PhD; Rodolphe Fischmeister, PhD

From INSERM, U769, Châtenay-Malabry, France (L.R.V.C., R.F.); University Paris-Sud 11, Faculté de Pharmacie, Châtenay-Malabry, France (L.R.V.C., R.F.); Centro de Investigação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal (L.R.V.C., I.V.); and Department of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom (D.M.F.C.).

Correspondence to Rodolphe Fischmeister, PhD, INSERM, U769, Faculté de Pharmacie, 5 Rue J.-B. Clément, F-92296 Châtenay-Malabry Cedex, France. E-mail fisch{at}vjf.inserm.fr

Received November 2, 2005; revision received February 23, 2006; accepted March 3, 2006.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) is the common second messenger for the cardiovascular effects of nitric oxide (NO) and natriuretic peptides, such as atrial or brain natriuretic peptide, which activate the soluble and particulate forms of guanylyl cyclase, respectively. However, natriuretic peptides and NO donors exert different effects on cardiac and vascular smooth muscle function. We therefore tested whether these differences are due to an intracellular compartmentation of cGMP and evaluated the role of phosphodiesterase (PDE) subtypes in this process.

Methods and Results— Subsarcolemmal cGMP signals were monitored in adult rat cardiomyocytes by expression of the rat olfactory cyclic nucleotide–gated (CNG) channel {alpha}-subunit and recording of the associated cGMP-gated current (ICNG). Atrial natriuretic peptide (10 nmol/L) or brain natriuretic peptide (10 nmol/L) induced a clear activation of ICNG, whereas NO donors (S-nitroso-N-acetyl-penicillamine, diethylamine NONOate, 3-morpholinosydnonimine, and spermine NO, all at 100 µmol/L) had little effect. The ICNG current was strongly potentiated by nonselective PDE inhibition with isobutyl methylxanthine (100 µmol/L) and by the PDE2 inhibitors erythro-9-(2-hydroxy-3-nonyl)adenine (10 µmol/L) and Bay 60-7550 (50 nmol/L). Surprisingly, sildenafil, a PDE5 inhibitor, produced a dose-dependent increase of ICNG activated by NO donors but had no effect (at 100 nmol/L) on the current elicited by atrial natriuretic peptide.

Conclusions— These results indicate that in rat cardiomyocytes (1) the particulate cGMP pool is readily accessible at the plasma membrane, whereas the soluble pool is not; and (2) PDE5 controls the soluble but not the particulate pool, whereas the latter is under the exclusive control of PDE2. Differential spatiotemporal distributions of cGMP may therefore contribute to the specific effects of natriuretic peptides and NO donors on cardiac function.


Key Words: cyclic GMP • natriuretic peptides • nitric oxide • phosphodiesterases • sildenafil


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) is a ubiquitous intracellular second messenger in the cardiovascular system. In the heart, acute elevation of cGMP concentration usually exerts negative metabolic as well as inotropic effects,1,2 whereas chronic elevation prevents and reverses cardiac hypertrophy.3–5 cGMP synthesis is controlled by 2 types of guanylyl cyclases (GC) that differ in their cellular location and activation by specific ligands: a particulate GC (pGC) present at the plasma membrane, which is activated by natriuretic peptides such as atrial (ANP), brain (BNP), and C-type natriuretic peptide6–8; and a soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC) present in the cytosol and activated by nitric oxide (NO).8,9

Clinical Perspective p 2228

Although NO and natriuretic peptides use cGMP as a common second messenger, there are many instances in which activation of pGC and sGC leads to different functional effects.10–14 One explanation for these divergent effects is that cGMP rises in specific subcellular locations, regulating different targets in different parts of the cell. Such a notion has been extensively substantiated in the case of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), a closely related cGMP counterpart.15 For example, work from this laboratory has shown that cAMP compartmentation occurs during ß-adrenergic stimulation of adult cardiac myocytes16 and is responsible for local activation of cardiac L-type Ca2+ channels.17,18 Such a compartmentation involves activation of subsarcolemmal cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE) by cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA),16 most likely through the formation of multimolecular signaling complexes involving PKA, PKA anchoring proteins, and PDE4 isoforms.19–21

Despite its crucial role in smooth muscle relaxation, the subcellular spatiotemporal organization of cGMP signaling has been relatively unexplored. PKA-anchoring protein–like proteins have been identified for targeting cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG) to protein substrates,22,23 but their characterization remains limited. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer–based cGMP fluorescent probes have been developed,24 but their availability as plasmid constructs currently restricts their use to cultured cells only.25

Previous work from this laboratory has examined the response of cardiac L-type Ca2+ channels to a local application of NO donors and demonstrated a rather limited spread of intracellular cGMP from its site of production to the remote part of the cell not exposed to NO, where sGC was inactive.26 In this study our aim was to characterize and compare in real time the changes in subsarcolemmal cGMP concentration in response to activators of sGC and pGC. For that purpose, we used the wild-type (WT) {alpha}-subunit of the rat olfactory cyclic nucleotide–gated channel (CNGA2) as a real-time sensor for subsarcolemmal cGMP.27 This channel binds cGMP with a >10-fold higher affinity than cAMP.27 Here we describe experiments performed on adult rat ventricular myocytes (ARVMs) infected with an adenovirus encoding the WT CNGA2 (Ad-CNGA2). Using this model, we provide evidence for cGMP compartmentation and identify PDE2 and PDE5 isoforms as key elements in this phenomenon.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Detailed methods are included in the online-only Data Supplement to this article.

The authors had full access to the data and take responsibility for its integrity. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Subsarcolemmal Localization of Recombinant CNGA2 Channels in ARVMs
In a first series of experiments, CNGA2 expression was investigated by immunofluorescence in ARVMs after 24 hours of culture. These results revealed the selective expression of recombinant WT-CNGA2 channels at the sarcolemmal structures in Ad-CNGA2–infected cells (see online-only Data Supplement).

Functional Expression of CNGA2 Channels in ARVMs
The CNGA2 current (ICNG) was recorded 24 hours after cell isolation in Ca2+- and Mg2+-free external solution. The individual ICNG tracings in Figure 1A show that application of the membrane-permeant cGMP analogue Sp-8 (100 µmol/L) induced a time-independent inward current at –50 mV in Ad-CNGA2 cells but not in noninfected myocytes. This current displayed other characteristic features of cyclic nucleotide–gated (CNG) currents, such as Mg2+ block (Figure 1B) and a linear current–voltage relationship crossing at 0 mV (Figure 1C). Such current was not detected in noninfected ARVMs and was thus attributed to the functional expression of WT CNGA2. Figure 1D summarizes the effect of Sp-8 on ICNG density. In noninfected myocytes, application of Sp-8 (100 µmol/L) did not change ICNG density (0.1±0.1 pA/pF; n=5), but it induced a large increase in Ad-CNGA2 cells (26.7±2.2 pA/pF; n=7). Application of a 10-fold lower concentration of Sp-8 (10 µmol/L) increased ICNG density to a value that was not statistically different from 100 µmol/L (22.9±0.7 pA/pF; n=4), indicating that the current generated by 100 µmol/L Sp-8 corresponded to the maximal amplitude of ICNG that the infected cell can generate. Thus, the response of ICNG to drug application was subsequently normalized to the response obtained at 100 µmol/L Sp-8 (see online-only Data Supplement for details).


Figure 1175119
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Functional expression of CNGA2 channels in ARVMs. A, Individual current tracings of ICNG obtained during 200-ms voltage pulse at –50 mV in infected (Ad-CNGA2) or noninfected (NI) myocytes. Each tracing was recorded in the presence of control solution supplemented (solid lines) or not (dotted lines) with the cGMP analogue Sp-8 (100 µmol/L). B, Time course of ICNG amplitude at –50 mV in an Ad-CNGA2 cell. The cell was initially superfused with control solution and then exposed to Sp-8 (100 µmol/L). The Sp-8–activated current was blocked in a reversible manner by the presence of Mg2+ (10 mmol/L). C, Current–voltage relationships of ICNG obtained with control solution ({blacksquare}) in the presence of 100 µmol/L Sp-8 alone ({blacktriangleup}) or with 10 mmol/L Mg2+ (•). D, Density of ICNG obtained in Ad-CNGA2 or noninfected myocytes challenged with Sp-8 (10 µmol/L or 100 µmol/L). ***P<0.005 vs noninfected cells.

cGMP Signals Elicited by Activation of sGC
We next investigated whether cGMP production by activation of sGC produced a detectable response of CNGA2 channels. Four different NO donors were tested, all at a 100-µmol/L concentration: S-nitroso-N-acetyl-penicillamine (SNAP), 3-morpholinosydnonimine, diethylamine NONOate, and spermine NO (SPNO). Figure 2A shows a typical experiment in which SPNO and SNAP were tested. SPNO produced a small increase in ICNG, whereas SNAP had no effect. On average (Figure 2B), all 4 NO donors produced only a small, although significant increase in ICNG, which ranged from 5% to 8% of the maximal response obtained with Sp-8 (100 µmol/L). Unlike the NO donors, a direct activator of sGC, HMR1766 (HMR) (10 µmol/L),28 produced no significant effect on ICNG (Figure 2B). To examine whether the overall small increase in subsarcolemmal cGMP on activation of sGC was due to a limited production of cGMP or to a rapid hydrolysis of the nucleotide by PDEs, we reexamined the effect of the NO donors and HMR in the presence of isobutyl methylxanthine (IBMX) (100 µmol/L), a broad-spectrum PDE inhibitor. Figure 2A shows that the effects of SPNO and SNAP on ICNG were strongly enhanced by IBMX. On average (Figure 2B), whereas IBMX had no effect per se on ICNG, it increased &10-fold the effects of the 4 NO donors and of HMR to values ranging from 63% to 73% of the maximal response induced by Sp-8 (100 µmol/L). These results indicate that PDE activity prevents cGMP produced by sGC to reach the sarcolemmal membrane.


Figure 2175119
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. cGMP signals elicited by activation of sGC. Typical experiment (A) and summary (B) of the effects of sGC activators on ICNG in Ad-CNGA2 myocytes. ICNG was measured as in Figure 1. Specific activation of sGC was achieved by a direct agonist HMR (10 µmol/L) or several NO donors (SNAP, SIN-1, DEANO, SPNO, all at 100 µmol/L concentration) and nonselective PDE inhibition by IBMX (100 µmol/L). At the end of each experiment the cell was challenged with Sp-8 (100 µmol/L) as an internal control for WT-CNGA2 channel expression. ***P<0.005 vs IBMX; #P<0.05 vs basal; ###P<0.005 vs basal.

cGMP Signals Elicited by Activation of pGC
Because pGC produces cGMP right at the sarcolemmal membrane, where CNG channels are expressed, we anticipated that the effect of natriuretic peptides on ICNG might be more prominent than those of NO donors. Figure 3 shows this was indeed the case. In the typical experiment illustrated in Figure 3A, ANP (10 nmol/L) or BNP (10 nmol/L) produced clear and reversible increases in ICNG. On average, ANP and BNP similarly increased ICNG to &25% of the Sp-8 response (Figure 3B). The effect of ANP on ICNG could be further increased by raising the concentration of the peptide, with a half-maximal effect seen between 10 and 30 nmol/L, and a maximal stimulation to &80% of the Sp-8 response seen at 100 nmol/L concentration (Figure 3C). BNP (10 nmol/L) had no additional effect on ICNG when ANP was already present at maximal concentration (100 nmol/L), indicating that the 2 peptides likely share a common receptor (Figure 3D). More interestingly, SNAP (100 µmol/L) produced no additional effect on ICNG stimulated by ANP, even though the concentration of ANP used in this case was not maximal (10 nmol/L; Figure 3D). This strongly suggests that cGMP rises in 2 different compartments on activation of sGC and pGC.


Figure 3175119
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. cGMP signals elicited by activation of pGC. Typical experiment (A) and summary (B) of the effects of pGC activators on ICNG in Ad-CNGA2 myocytes. Specific activation of pGC was achieved by ANP (10 nmol/L) or BNP (10 nmol/L) and nonselective PDE inhibition by IBMX (100 µmol/L). The effect of Sp-8 (100 µmol/L) serves as an internal control for WT-CNGA2 channel expression. C, Concentration-dependent effects of ANP in Ad-CNGA2 myocytes. D, Nonadditive effect of SNAP (100 µmol/L) or BNP (10 nmol/L) in ANP-activated ICNG. *P<0.05 vs IBMX; ###P<0.005 vs basal.

To evaluate the role of PDEs in the effects of ANP and BNP on ICNG, the natriuretic peptides were tested again in the presence of IBMX (100 µmol/L). Figure 3A shows that the PDE inhibitor strongly increased the response of ICNG to both ANP and BNP (10 nmol/L), indicating that PDEs limit the accumulation of cGMP at the plasma membrane. However, although the final amplitude of ICNG was similar with ANP, BNP, and the NO donors when IBMX was present (60% to 70% of the Sp-8 response), the relative effect of IBMX was 5-fold larger when used on top of sGC activation than on top of pCG activation. This may indicate a stronger dependence on PDE activity of cGMP produced by sGC compared with pGC.

Cross-Activation of WT CNGA2 by cAMP?
cGMP elevation can affect cAMP metabolism, in particular through inhibition of cGMP-inhibited PDE3 and activation of cGMP-stimulated PDE2.29 Thus, an obvious question was whether subsarcolemmal cAMP changes contaminated the response of ICNG to activators of sGC or pGC. To address this question, we infected ARVMs with an adenovirus encoding a double mutant of the CNGA2 channel (C460W/E583M-CNGA2), which possesses a 10-fold higher sensitivity toward cAMP than cGMP.16,27 We found that neither SNAP (100 µmol/L; n=3), nor HMR (10 nmol/L; n=3), nor ANP (10 nmol/L; n=3), nor BNP (10 nmol/L; n=3), alone or in the presence of 100 µmol/L IBMX, produced any significant increase in the CNG current measured with the C460W/E583M-CNGA2 channels, although, as a positive control, a direct stimulation of adenylyl cyclase with the hydrosoluble forskolin analogue L-858051 (100 µmol/L) strongly increased the current (n=6; data not shown). Thus, the ICNG changes measured with the WT-CNGA2 channel on manipulations of sGC or pGC pathways indeed reflect subsarcolemmal cGMP changes and not cAMP changes.

Role of PDE Subtypes in cGMP Signals Generated by sGC
The aforementioned results indicate that PDE activity determines the intracellular distribution of cGMP in rat cardiomyocytes. In the following experiments, our aim was to identify the PDE subtypes that are involved. Four major PDE isoforms bind and hydrolyze intracellular cGMP in cardiomyocytes: PDE1, which is activated by Ca2+-calmodulin; PDE2, which is activated by cGMP; PDE3, which hydrolyzes preferentially cAMP and is inhibited by cGMP; and PDE5, which is highly specific for cGMP. Selective inhibitors exist only for the 3 latter PDE isoforms and were used here: erythro-9-(2-hydroxy-3-nonyl)adenine (EHNA) and Bay 60-7550 for PDE2, cilostamide for PDE3, and sildenafil (Viagra, Pfizer) for PDE5. None of the PDE inhibitors tested had any effect per se on basal ICNG (Figure 4A and 4B, and data not shown for cilostamide). Figure 4A shows a typical experiment in which PDE2 and PDE5 inhibitors were tested during sGC activation with SNAP (100 µmol/L). As shown before (Figure 2B), SNAP alone induced a slight increase in ICNG. However, addition of EHNA (10 µmol/L) or sildenafil (100 nmol/L) in the presence of SNAP amplified the effect of the NO donor considerably. On average (Figure 4B), EHNA in the presence of SNAP increased ICNG &4-fold (from 5% to 22% of the maximal Sp-8 response). Bay 60-7550 (50 nmol/L), another more potent PDE2 inhibitor that, unlike EHNA, does not inhibit adenosine deaminase,30 produced a similar effect. Sildenafil produced a dose-dependent effect on ICNG in the presence of SNAP (Figure 4C), with a maximal response observed at 100 nmol/L that was almost 2-fold larger than that of EHNA or Bay 60-7550 (from 5% to 39% of the Sp-8 response). When both EHNA and sildenafil were present, ICNG increased further (Figure 4A), to &60% of the maximal Sp-8 response (Figure 4B). Interestingly, the effect of EHNA plus sildenafil was identical to the effect of IBMX (Figure 4A and 4B), suggesting that no other PDE subtype is involved. This was confirmed in separate experiments in which PDE3 inhibition by cilostamide (1 µmol/L) had no effect on ICNG in the presence of SNAP (n=5; data not shown). Thus, PDE5 and to a lesser extent PDE2 contribute to limit the spread of cGMP on sGC activation.


Figure 4175119
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Role of PDE2 and PDE5 in cGMP signals generated by sGC. Typical experiment (A) and summary (B) of the effects of SNAP (100 µmol/L) alone or in the presence of PDE inhibitors: EHNA (10 µmol/L), sildenafil (Sil) (100 nmol/L), Bay 60-750 (BAY) (50 nmol/L), and IBMX (100 µmol/L). The effect of Sp-8 (100 µmol/L) serves as an internal control for WT-CNGA2 channel expression. C, Concentration-dependent effects of sildenafil in Ad-CNGA2 myocytes in the presence of SNAP. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.005 vs SNAP; ###P<0.005 vs basal ICNG.

Role of PDE Subtypes in cGMP Signals Generated by pGC
Using the same strategy, we examined the contribution of PDE2 and PDE5 to the control of the cGMP pool generated by activation of pGC. Figure 5A shows a typical experiment in which PDE2 and PDE5 inhibitors were tested during pGC activation with ANP (10 nmol/L). As shown before (Figure 3), ANP induced a clear increase in ICNG. However, in this case, addition of sildenafil (100 nmol/L) on top of ANP failed to increase ICNG, whereas PDE2 inhibition with EHNA (10 µmol/L) increased ICNG considerably. On average (Figure 5B), EHNA in the presence of ANP increased &2-fold ICNG (from 26% to 55% of the maximal Sp-8 response), whereas sildenafil had no effect. When both PDE inhibitors were present, the stimulation of ICNG was not different from the effect of EHNA alone or from the effect of IBMX (100 µmol/L; Figure 5A and 5B), suggesting that no other PDE was involved. This was confirmed in separate experiments in which PDE3 inhibition by cilostamide (1 µmol/L) had no effect on ICNG in the presence of ANP (n=5; data not shown). Thus, unlike when cGMP is produced by sGC, PDE5 is not involved in the hydrolysis of cGMP produced by pGC, which is entirely being hydrolyzed by PDE2.


Figure 5175119
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Role of PDE2 and PDE5 in cGMP signals generated by pGC. Typical experiment (A) and summary (B) of the effects of ANP (10 nmol/L) alone or in the presence of PDE inhibitors: EHNA (10 µmol/L), sildenafil (Sil) (100 nmol/L), and IBMX (100 µmol/L). The effect of Sp-8 (100 µmol/L) serves as an internal control for WT-CNGA2 channel expression. ***P<0.005 vs NAP; ###P<0.005 vs basal.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The use of recombinant CNG channels as cyclic nucleotide biosensors was developed in a series of elegant studies in model cell lines for the measurement of intracellular cAMP.27,31,32 In the present study we have applied this methodology to differentiated adult cardiomyocytes in primary culture to measure in real time the changes in subsarcolemmal cGMP. Our study reveals major differences in the spatiotemporal distribution of intracellular cGMP on activation of its 2 main routes of synthesis. When pGC is activated by the natriuretic peptides ANP and BNP, cGMP rises steadily beneath the membrane; on the contrary, when sGC is activated by NO donors or HMR, a direct activator,28 subsarcolemmal cGMP is barely affected. This difference indicates that intracellular cGMP is not uniformly distributed within the cell but is instead compartmentalized in separate, slowly equilibrating pools. We found that cyclic nucleotide PDEs play a key role in this compartmentation, with different PDE subtypes controlling the pGC (particulate) and sGC (soluble) cGMP pools. Indeed, PDE5 appears to control the soluble but not the particulate pool, whereas the latter is under the exclusive control of PDE2.

Several studies have shown differential effects of cGMP produced by sGC and pGC on various cell functions. For instance, in a human epithelial cell line, activation of pGC and not sGC is coupled to the inhibition of Ca2+ efflux, whereas activation of sGC and not pGC is involved in the stimulation of Ca2+ sequestration into the intracellular Ca2+ stores.10 In pig airway smooth muscle cells, stimulation of pGC causes relaxation exclusively by decreasing intracellular Ca2+ concentration, whereas stimulation of sGC decreases both Ca2+ concentration and Ca2+ sensitivity of the myofilaments.11 In human endothelial cells from umbilical vein, activation of sGC induces relaxation in a more efficient manner than does activation of pGC.14 Differences between pGC and sGC activation have also been reported in cardiac preparations. For instance, in frog ventricular myocytes, sGC activation caused a pronounced inhibition of the L-type Ca2+ current (ICa,L) on stimulation by intracellular cAMP,33 whereas pGC activation had little effect.34 In rabbit atria, activation of pGC caused a larger cAMP accumulation (via PDE3 inhibition), cGMP efflux, and ANP release than activation of sGC.12 In mouse ventricular myocytes, pGC activation caused a decrease in intracellular Ca2+ transient, whereas sGC activation had little effect.13

Given the separate sources of cGMP within the cell, ie, membrane versus cytosol, it was tempting to speculate in the aforementioned studies that the functional differences between pGC and sGC activators arose from a functional compartmentation of cGMP. However, because NO donors were used in these studies to activate sGC and NO and reactive nitrogen species may affect many other processes besides sGC, validation of that hypothesis required a more direct assessment of the cGMP compartmentation. To our knowledge, the present study provides the first direct evidence for intracellular cGMP compartmentation in intact adult cardiac myocytes. We took advantage of the method developed by Rich and coworkers27,31 in HEK293 cells to follow in real time cGMP changes beneath the sarcolemmal membrane using the WT-CNGA2 channel as a readout. We confirmed by immunocytochemistry (see online-only Data Supplement) that this channel is not normally expressed in native rat cardiomyocytes35 but becomes functionally expressed 24 hours after infection of the myocytes with the Ad-CNGA2 construct developed by Fagan et al.32 A similar method was used recently to follow cAMP changes in the same preparation,16 with the use of mutants of the CNGA2 channel with a higher sensitivity toward cAMP versus cGMP.

The WT-CNGA2 channel responds to cGMP changes with a threshold at 0.1 to 0.5 µmol/L concentration, a K1/2 of 1.4 µmol/L, and a maximal amplitude obtained at 5 to 10 µmol/L cGMP.27 With the use of these parameters and the amplitude of the CNG current measured at the end of each experiment after application of a saturating concentration (100 µmol/L) of the cGMP analogue Sp-8, it was possible to give a rough estimate of the subsarcolemmal cGMP concentration reached in each of the experimental conditions tested here. We found that cGMP level was <0.5 µmol/L when sGC was maximally activated (with any of the 4 NO donors tested, all used at 100 µmol/L concentration), whereas it reached 2.3 µmol/L on maximal activation of pGC (with 300 nmol/L ANP). This 5-fold difference was not due to a lower activity of sGC versus pGC because, on the contrary, the level of cGMP rose proportionally higher during sGC versus pGC activation on PDE inhibition with IBMX (compare Figures 2B and 3UpB). Thus, we conclude that intracellular cGMP is highly compartmentalized within adult rat cardiomyocytes and that homogeneous distribution is prevented by PDE activity.

At least 4 different PDE isoforms account for the hydrolysis of cGMP in heart tissue36: PDE1, which is activated by Ca2+-calmodulin and hydrolyzes cAMP and cGMP equally well, at least in heart; PDE2, which hydrolyzes either cAMP or cGMP and is stimulated by cGMP binding to amino terminal allosteric regulatory sites known as GAF domains37; PDE3, which has a similar affinity for cAMP and cGMP but a higher Vmax for the former, making it a cGMP-inhibited cAMP-PDE; and PDE5, which is highly specific for cGMP and is also activated by cGMP acting both on GAF domains and via phosphorylation by PKG.38 A fifth isoform (PDE9A), highly specific for cGMP, has been shown to be expressed at the mRNA level in human39 but not mouse heart.40 All PDE isoforms but PDE9A39,40 are inhibited by IBMX, and a number of drugs have been developed as selective inhibitors of PDE2, PDE3, and PDE5. In this study we used EHNA41 and Bay 60-755030 to evaluate the contribution of PDE2, cilostamide for PDE3, and sildenafil (Viagra) for PDE5.38 PDE1, which is essentially expressed in a nonmyocyte fraction of cardiac tissue,42 is unlikely to play a major role under our experimental conditions because Ca2+ ions were omitted from both extracellular and pipette solutions.

Our results demonstrate that both particulate and soluble pools of cGMP are controlled by PDE2. Until now, PDE2 has been shown to be essentially involved in the control of intracellular cAMP concentration. For instance, in primary bovine glomerulosa cells, PDE2 is the main enzyme by which ANP inhibits aldosterone secretion,43 and this is achieved by a marked reduction in cAMP level due to cGMP activation of PDE2.43 In frog ventricular26,33,41 and human atrial myocytes,44,45 NO donors or intracellular cGMP induces activation of PDE2, causing a decrease in cAMP and an inhibition of ICa,L.29 Our study demonstrates that PDE2 is also an important component of the cGMP catabolism in cardiomyocytes. Its preferential location in the membrane fraction of cardiac myocytes46 likely accounts for the unique role of PDE2 in the control of the particulate pool of cGMP.

PDE5 is highly expressed in vascular smooth muscle, and its inhibition is a primary target for the treatment of erectile dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension.38,47 Despite the detection of its mRNA in heart,48 the presence and role of a functional PDE5 protein in cardiomyocytes have been controversial.36,49 However, recent evidence strongly supports the presence of a functional PDE5 in cardiac myocytes.2 First, PDE5 protein has been detected by immunocytochemistry and found to be located both in the cytosol and at Z bands in normal cardiomyocytes from dog50 and mouse ventricle.25 Second, PDE5 inhibition with the use of sildenafil (Viagra) decreases the ß-adrenergic stimulation of cardiac systolic and diastolic function in dog,50 mouse,25 and human51 as well as the ß-stimulation of ICa,L in guinea pig ventricular myocytes.52 Finally, chronic exposure to sildenafil was found to prevent and reverse cardiac hypertrophy in mouse hearts exposed to sustained pressure overload.5 With our study, we confirm the presence of functional PDE5 in ARVMs. In addition, we demonstrate that this PDE subtype specifically controls the soluble pool of cGMP but not the particulate pool. This could be either because PDE5 is more closely compartmentalized with sGC than pGC or because PKG, which activates PDE5,38 is compartmentalized with sGC but not pGC. Coadministration of sildenafil and an NO donor but not ANP produced a large rise of cGMP at the membrane, favoring the inhibition via PKG of L-type Ca2+ channels.53 Interestingly, sildenafil and other new PDE5 inhibitors are contraindicated in men who use nitrate medications54 because the coadministration of these agents may cause cGMP to accumulate, resulting in marked and unpredictable decreases in blood pressure, accompanied by symptoms of hypotension. Inasmuch as our results in ARVMs apply to vascular smooth muscle, this could be due to a specific role of PDE5 in controlling the soluble pool of cGMP. Under such circumstances, pGC and PDE5 might control different pools of cGMP, and one may speculate that coadministration of PDE5 inhibitors and natriuretic peptides instead of nitrates might lead to less adverse effects. Further studies will be required to test this hypothesis.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by a grant from INSERM Programme National de Recherche sur les Maladies Cardiovasculaires and by European Union contract LSHM-CT-2005-018833/EUGeneHeart. L.R.V. Castro is a recipient of a grant from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (Portugal). We thank Florence Lefebvre and Patrick Lechêne for excellent technical assistance and Grégoire Vandecasteele and Marco Conti for their helpful comments on the manuscript. We are grateful to Valérie Nicolas, Plateforme Imagerie Cellulaire IFR-141, for confocal analysis.

Disclosures

Dr Fischmeister has served as an expert witness for Pfizer. The other authors report no conflicts.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Shah AM, MacCarthy PA. Paracrine and autocrine effects of nitric oxide on myocardial function. Pharmacol Ther. 2000; 86: 49–86.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Semigran MJ. Type 5 phosphodiesterase inhibition: the focus shifts to the heart. Circulation. 2005; 112: 2589–2591.[Free Full Text]
  3. Rosenkranz AC, Woods RL, Dusting GJ, Ritchie RH. Antihypertrophic actions of the natriuretic peptides in adult rat cardiomyocytes: importance of cyclic GMP. Cardiovasc Res. 2003; 57: 515–522.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Kempf T, Wollert KC. Nitric oxide and the enigma of cardiac hypertrophy. BioEssays. 2004; 26: 608–615.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Takimoto E, Champion HC, Li M, Belardi D, Ren S, Rodriguez ER, Bedja D, Gabrielson KL, Wang Y, Kass DA. Chronic inhibition of cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase 5A prevents and reverses cardiac hypertrophy. Nat Med. 2005; 11: 214–222.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. D’Souza SP, Davis M, Baxter GF. Autocrine and paracrine actions of natriuretic peptides in the heart. Pharmacol Ther. 2004; 101: 113–129.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Kuhn M. Structure, regulation, and function of mammalian membrane guanylyl cyclase receptors, with a focus on guanylyl cyclase-A. Circ Res. 2003; 93: 700–709.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Padayatti PS, Pattanaik P, Ma X, van den Akker F. Structural insights into the regulation and the activation mechanism of mammalian guanylyl cyclases. Pharmacol Ther. 2004; 104: 83–99.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Pyriochou A, Papapetropoulos A. Soluble guanylyl cyclase: more secrets revealed. Cell Signal. 2005; 17: 407–43.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Zolle O, Lawrie AM, Simpson AWM. Activation of the particulate and not the soluble guanylate cyclase leads to the inhibition of Ca2+ extrusion through localized elevation of cGMP. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 25892–25899.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Rho EH, Perkins WJ, Lorenz RR, Warner DO, Jones KA. Differential effects of soluble and particulate guanylyl cyclase on Ca2+ sensitivity in airway smooth muscle. J Appl Physiol. 2002; 92: 257–263.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Wen JF, Cui X, Jin JY, Kim SM, Kim SZ, Kim SH, Lee HS, Cho KW. High and low gain switches for regulation of cAMP efflux concentration: distinct roles for particulate GC- and soluble GC-cGMP-PDE3 signaling in rabbit atria. Circ Res. 2004; 94: 936–943.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Su J, Scholz PM, Weiss HR. Differential effects of cGMP produced by soluble and particulate guanylyl cyclase on mouse ventricular myocytes. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2005; 230: 242–250.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Rivero-Vilches FJ, De Frutos S, Saura M, Rodriguez-Puyol D, Rodriguez-Puyol M. Differential relaxing responses to particulate or soluble guanylyl cyclase activation on endothelial cells: a mechanism dependent on PKG-I alpha activation by NO/cGMP. Am J Physiol. 2003; 285: C891–C898.
  15. Steinberg SF, Brunton LL. Compartmentation of G protein–coupled signaling pathways in cardiac myocytes. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2001; 41: 751–773.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Rochais F, Vandecasteele G, Lefebvre F, Lugnier C, Lum H, Mazet J-L, Cooper DMF, Fischmeister R. Negative feedback exerted by PKA and cAMP phosphodiesterase on subsarcolemmal cAMP signals in intact cardiac myocytes: an in vivo study using adenovirus-mediated expression of CNG channels. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 52095–52105.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Jurevicius J, Fischmeister R. cAMP compartmentation is responsible for a local activation of cardiac Ca2+ channels by ß-adrenergic agonists. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996; 93: 295–299.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Jurevicius J, Skeberdis VA, Fischmeister R. Role of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase isoforms in cAMP compartmentation following ß2-adrenergic stimulation of ICa,L in frog ventricular myocytes. J Physiol. 2003; 551: 239–252.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Dodge KL, Khouangsathiene S, Kapiloff MS, Mouton R, Hill EV, Houslay MD, Langeberg LK, Scott JD. mAKAP assembles a protein kinase A/PDE4 phosphodiesterase cAMP signaling module. EMBO J. 2001; 20: 1921–1930.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Lehnart SE, Wehrens XHT, Reiken S, Warrier S, Belevych AE, Harvey RD, Richter W, Jin SLC, Conti M, Marks A. Phosphodiesterase 4D deficiency in the ryanodine receptor complex promotes heart failure and arrhythmias. Cell. 2005; 123: 23–35.
  21. Dodge-Kafka KL, Soughayer J, Pare GC, Carlisle Michel JJ, Langeberg LK, Kapiloff MS, Scott JD. The protein kinase A anchoring protein mAKAP co-ordinates two integrated cAMP effector pathways. Nature. 2005; 437: 574–578.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. MacMillan-Crow LA, Lincoln TM. High-affinity binding and localization of the cyclic GMP–dependent protein kinase with the intermediate filament protein vimentin. Biochemistry. 1994; 33: 8035–8043.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Vo NK, Gettemy JM, Coghlan VM. Identification of cGMP-dependent protein kinase anchoring proteins (GKAPs). Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998; 246: 831–835.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Honda A, Adams SR, Sawyer CL, Lev-Ram V, Tsien RY, Dostmann WR. Spatiotemporal dynamics of guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate revealed by a genetically encoded, fluorescent indicator. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98: 2437–2442.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Takimoto E, Champion HC, Belardi D, Moslehi J, Mongillo M, Mergia E, Montrose DC, Isoda T, Aufiero K, Zaccolo M, Dostmann WR, Smith CJ, Kass DA. cGMP catabolism by phosphodiesterase 5A regulates cardiac adrenergic stimulation by NOS3-dependent mechanism. Circ Res. 2005; 96: 100–109.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Dittrich M, Jurevicius J, Georget M, Rochais F, Fleischmann BK, Hescheler J, Fischmeister R. Local response of L-type Ca2+ current to nitric oxide in frog ventricular myocytes. J Physiol. 2001; 534: 109–121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Rich TC, Tse TE, Rohan JG, Schaack J, Karpen JW. In vivo assessment of local phosphodiesterase activity using tailored cyclic nucleotide–gated channels as cAMP sensors. J Gen Physiol. 2001; 118: 63–77.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Schindler U, Strobel H, Schonafinger K, Linz W, Lohn M, Martorana PA, Rutten H, Schindler PW, Busch AE, Sohn M, Topfer A, Pistorius A, Jannek C, Muelsch A. Biochemistry and pharmacology of novel anthranilic acid derivatives activating heme-oxidized soluble guanylyl cyclase. Mol Pharmacol. 2006; 69: 1260–1268.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Fischmeister R, Castro L, Abi-Gerges A, Rochais F, Vandecasteele G. Species- and tissue-dependent effects of NO and cyclic GMP on cardiac ion channels. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2005; 142: 136–143.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Boess FG, Hendrix M, van der Staay FJ, Erb C, Schreiber R, van Staveren W, de Vente J, Prickaerts J, Blokland A, Koenig G. Inhibition of phosphodiesterase 2 increases neuronal cGMP, synaptic plasticity and memory performance. Neuropharmacology. 2004; 47: 1081–1092.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Rich TC, Fagan KA, Nakata H, Schaack J, Cooper DMF, Karpen JW. Cyclic nucleotide–gated channels colocalize with adenylyl cyclase in regions of restricted cAMP diffusion. J Gen Physiol. 2000; 116: 147–161.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Fagan KA, Rich TC, Tolman S, Schaack J, Karpen JW, Cooper DM. Adenovirus-mediated expression of an olfactory cyclic nucleotide–gated channel regulates the endogenous Ca2+-inhibitable adenylyl cyclase in C6–2B glioma cells. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274: 12445–12453.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Méry PF, Pavoine C, Belhassen L, Pecker F, Fischmeister R. Nitric oxide regulates cardiac Ca2+ current: involvement of cGMP-inhibited and cGMP-stimulated phosphodiesterases through guanylyl cyclase activation. J Biol Chem. 1993; 268: 26286–26295.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Gisbert M-P, Fischmeister R. Atrial natriuretic factor regulates the calcium current in frog isolated cardiac cells. Circ Res. 1988; 62: 660–667.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Kaupp UB, Seifert R. Cyclic nucleotide–gated ion channels. Physiol Rev. 2002; 82: 769–824.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Maurice DH, Palmer D, Tilley DG, Dunkerley HA, Netherton SJ, Raymond DR, Elbatarny HS, Jimmo SL. Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase activity, expression, and targeting in cells of the cardiovascular system. Mol Pharmacol. 2003; 64: 533–546.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Martinez SE, Wu AY, Glavas NA, Tang XB, Turley S, Hol WGJ, Beavo JA. The two GAF domains in phosphodiesterase 2A have distinct roles in dimerization and in cGMP binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 13260–13265.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Rybalkin SD, Yan C, Bornfeldt KE, Beavo JA. Cyclic GMP phosphodiesterases and regulation of smooth muscle function. Circ Res. 2003; 93: 280–291.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Fisher DA, Smith JF, Pillar JS, St Denis SH, Cheng JB. Isolation and characterization of PDE9A, a novel human cGMP-specific phosphodiesterase. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273: 15559–15564.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Soderling SH, Bayuga SJ, Beavo JA. Identification and characterization of a novel family of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273: 15553–15558.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Méry PF, Pavoine C, Pecker F, Fischmeister R. Erythro-9-(2-hydroxy-3-nonyl)adenine inhibits cyclic GMP–stimulated phosphodiesterase in isolated cardiac myocytes. Mol Pharmacol. 1995; 48: 121–130.[Abstract]
  42. Bode DC, Kanter JR, Brunton LL. Cellular distribution of phosphodiesterase isoforms in rat cardiac tissue. Circ Res. 1991; 68: 1070–1079.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. MacFarland RT, Zelus BD, Beavo JA. High concentrations of a cGMP-stimulated phosphodiesterase mediate ANP-induced decreases in cAMP and steroidogenesis in adrenal glomerulosa cells. J Biol Chem. 1991; 266: 136–142.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Rivet-Bastide M, Vandecasteele G, Hatem S, Verde I, Benardeau A, Mercadier JJ, Fischmeister R. cGMP-stimulated cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase regulates the basal calcium current in human atrial myocytes. J Clin Invest. 1997; 99: 2710–2718.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Vandecasteele G, Verde I, Rucker-Martin C, Donzeau-Gouge P, Fischmeister R. Cyclic GMP regulation of the L-type Ca2+ channel current in human atrial myocytes. J Physiol. 2001; 533: 329–340.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Muller B, Stoclet J-C, Lugnier C. Cytosolic and membrane-bound cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases from guinea pig cardiac ventricles. Eur J Pharmacol. 1992; 225: 263–272.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Sastry BK, Narasimhan C, Reddy NK, Raju BS. Clinical efficacy of sildenafil in primary pulmonary hypertension: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43: 1149–1153.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Kotera J, Fujishige K, Akatsuka H, Imai Y, Yanaka N, Omori K. Novel alternative splice variants of cGMP-binding cGMP-specific phosphodiesterase. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273: 26982–26990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Wallis RM, Corbin JD, Francis SH, Ellis P. Tissue distribution of phosphodiesterase families and the effects of sildenafil on tissue cyclic nucleotides, platelet function, and the contractile responses of trabeculae carneae and aortic rings in vitro. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 83: 3C–12C.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Senzaki H, Smith CJ, Juang GJ, Isoda T, Mayer SP, Ohler A, Paolocci N, Tomaselli GF, Hare JM, Kass DA. Cardiac phosphodiesterase 5 (cGMP-specific) modulates ß-adrenergic signaling in vivo and is down-regulated in heart failure. FASEB J. 2001; 15: 1718–1726.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Borlaug BA, Melenovsky V, Marhin T, Fitzgerald P, Kass DA. Sildenafil inhibits ß-adrenergic–stimulated cardiac contractility in humans. Circulation. 2005; 112: 2642–2649.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Ziolo MT, Lewandowski SJ, Smith JM, Romano FD, Wahler GM. Inhibition of cyclic GMP hydrolysis with zaprinast reduces basal and cyclic AMP-elevated L-type calcium current in guinea-pig ventricular myocytes. Br J Pharmacol. 2003; 138: 986–994.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. Méry P-F, Lohmann SM, Walter U, Fischmeister R. Ca2+ current is regulated by cyclic GMP–dependent protein kinase in mammalian cardiac myocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991; 88: 1197–1201.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Kostis JB, Jackson G, Rosen R, Barrett-Connor E, Billups K, Burnett AL, Carson C III, Cheitlin M, Debusk R, Fonseca V, Ganz P, Goldstein I, Guay A, Hatzichristou D, Hollander JE, Hutter A, Katz S, Kloner RA, Mittleman M, Montorsi F, Montorsi P, Nehra A, Sadovsky R, Shabsigh R. Sexual dysfunction and cardiac risk (the Second Princeton Consensus Conference). Am J Cardiol. 2005; 96: 313–321.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) is the common second messenger for the cardiovascular effects of nitric oxide (NO) and natriuretic peptides, such as atrial or brain natriuretic peptide, which activate the soluble and particulate forms of guanylyl cyclase, respectively. However, natriuretic peptides and NO donors exert different effects on cardiac and vascular smooth muscle function. In this study we demonstrate that these differences are due to different intracellular compartmentation of cGMP. We used the rat olfactory cyclic nucleotide–gated (CNG) channel as a reporter gene to measure subsarcolemmal cGMP concentration in adult rat ventricular myocytes. We found that when particulate guanylyl cyclase is activated by atrial natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic peptide, cGMP steadily rises beneath the membrane; on the contrary, when soluble guanylyl cyclase is activated by NO donors, subsarcolemmal cGMP is barely affected. This difference indicates that intracellular cGMP is not uniformly distributed within the cell but is instead compartmentalized in separate, slowly equilibrating pools. We found that cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases (PDEs) play a key role in this compartmentation, with different PDE subtypes controlling the particulate and soluble cGMP pools. In particular, when sildenafil (Viagra) was used to inhibit PDE5, the effect of NO donors on subsarcolemmal cGMP was strongly increased, whereas that of atrial natriuretic peptide was not affected. Our results indicate that PDE5 controls the soluble but not the particulate pool, whereas the latter is under the exclusive control of the cGMP-stimulated PDE2. Inasmuch as our results in cardiac myocytes apply to vascular smooth muscle, they may help to explain why sildenafil and other PDE5 inhibitors are contraindicated in men who use nitrate medications.


*    Footnotes
 
The online-only Data Supplement can be found at http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.599241/DC1.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Khairallah, R. J. Khairallah, M. E. Young, B. G. Allen, M. A. Gillis, G. Danialou, C. F. Deschepper, B. J. Petrof, and C. Des Rosiers
Sildenafil and cardiomyocyte-specific cGMP signaling prevent cardiomyopathic changes associated with dystrophin deficiency
PNAS, May 13, 2008; 105(19): 7028 - 7033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
D. A. Kass
Message Delivered: How Myocytes Control cAMP Signaling
Circ. Res., May 9, 2008; 102(9): 1002 - 1004.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sci SignalHome page
B. Kemp-Harper and R. Feil
Meeting Report: cGMP Matters
Sci. Signal., March 4, 2008; 1200(1): pe12 - pe12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sci SignalHome page
B. Kemp-Harper and R. Feil
Meeting Report: cGMP Matters
Sci. Signal., March 4, 2008; 1(9): pe12 - pe12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. W. M. Nausch, J. Ledoux, A. D. Bonev, M. T. Nelson, and W. R. Dostmann
Differential patterning of cGMP in vascular smooth muscle cells revealed by single GFP-linked biosensors
PNAS, January 8, 2008; 105(1): 365 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
D. A. Kass, H. C. Champion, and J. A. Beavo
Phosphodiesterase Type 5: Expanding Roles in Cardiovascular Regulation
Circ. Res., November 26, 2007; 101(11): 1084 - 1095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. K. Green, R. C. Stratton, P. E. Squires, and A. W. M. Simpson
Atrial Natriuretic Peptide Attenuates Elevations in Ca2+ and Protects Hepatocytes by Stimulating Net Plasma Membrane Ca2+ Efflux
J. Biol. Chem., November 23, 2007; 282(47): 34542 - 34554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
F. Vandeput, S. L. Wolda, J. Krall, R. Hambleton, L. Uher, K. N. McCaw, P. B. Radwanski, V. Florio, and M. A. Movsesian
Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterase PDE1C1 in Human Cardiac Myocytes
J. Biol. Chem., November 9, 2007; 282(45): 32749 - 32757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
F. L. Martin, T. Supaporn, H. H. Chen, S. M. Sandberg, Y. Matsuda, M. Jougasaki, and J. C. Burnett Jr.
Distinct roles for renal particulate and soluble guanylyl cyclases in preserving renal function in experimental acute heart failure
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): R1580 - R1585.
[Abstract] [Full Text]