(Circulation. 2006;113:1335-1343.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Stroke |
From the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga (Q.Y., J.D.E., R.J.B.); Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (L.D.B.); Health Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario (C.S., H.J.); and Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada (J.M.F.).
Correspondence to Quanhe Yang, PhD, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, MS E86, Atlanta, GA 30333. E-mail qay0{at}cdc.gov
Received June 24, 2005; revision received December 19, 2005; accepted December 23, 2005.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results In this population-based cohort study with quasi-experimental intervention, we used segmented log-linear regression to evaluate trends in stroke-related mortality before and after folic acid fortification in the United States and Canada and, as a comparison, during the same period in England and Wales, where fortification is not required. Average blood folate concentrations increased and homocysteine concentrations decreased in the United States after fortification. The ongoing decline in stroke mortality observed in the United States between 1990 and 1997 accelerated in 1998 to 2002 in nearly all population strata, with an overall change from 0.3% (95% CI, 0.7 to 0.08) to 2.9 (95% CI, 3.5 to 2.3) per year (P=0.0005). Sensitivity analyses indicate that changes in other major recognized risk factors are unlikely to account for the reduced number of stroke-related deaths in the United States. The fall in stroke mortality in Canada averaged 1.0% (95% CI, 1.4 to 0.6) per year from 1990 to 1997 and accelerated to 5.4% (95% CI, 6.0 to 4.7) per year in 1998 to 2002 (P
0.0001). In contrast, the decline in stroke mortality in England and Wales did not change significantly between 1990 and 2002.
Conclusions The improvement in stroke mortality observed after folic acid fortification in the United States and Canada but not in England and Wales is consistent with the hypothesis that folic acid fortification helps to reduce deaths from stroke.
Key Words: mortality nutrition population prevention stroke
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical Perspective p 1343
Health Canada implemented mandatory folic acid fortification (150 µg of folic acid per 100 g of flour) in 1998.6 Mean red cell folate concentrations subsequently increased by 41% among women of reproductive age,7 and limited available data suggest that the expected concomitant reduction in average blood homocysteine concentration occurred.8
Blood homocysteine concentration appears to be an independent risk factor for stroke,912 so this population-wide reduction of blood homocysteine concentrations could have important health benefits. Stroke is a major public health burden in the United States, Canada, and many other countries, although the associated mortality has slowly improved in recent years.1315 Many factors have probably contributed to this improvement. We examined national stroke mortality data from the United States and Canada, where mandatory fortification has been in place since 1998, and compared the findings with similar data from England and Wales, where fortification is not mandatory, to see if accelerated improvement in stroke mortality occurred in association with folic acid fortification.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
40 years of age, a group that experienced >95% of deaths associated with stroke. The period of study included the time during which coding for cause of death was changed from the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10). ICD-9 was used to code deaths in the United States from 1990 to 1998, in Canada from 1990 to 1999, and in England and Wales from 1990 to 2000. ICD-10 was used to code deaths in the United States from 1999 to 2002, in Canada from 2000 to 2002, and in England and Wales from 2001 to 2002. In the mortality analyses, we included all records with a code for stroke (ICD-9 codes 430.0 to 434.9 and 436.0 to 438.9 or ICD-10 codes I60-I69) as the underlying cause of death. To ensure comparability of the data throughout the entire period of study, we used comparability ratios to correct for the inclusiveness of ICD-10 codes relative to the corresponding ICD-9 codes.1618 The comparability ratios were 1.059 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.057 to 1.060) and 1.069 (95% CI, 1.053 to 1.085) for the United States and Canada and 1.090 (95% CI, 1.086 to 1.094) and 1.131 (95% CI, 1.125 to 1.136) for women and men from England and Wales, respectively.1719
Statistical Analysis
Mortality rates were age-adjusted with 2000 population as standard in the United States, 2001 population as standard in Canada, and the European standard population in England and Wales. We computed rates by sex, age group (40 to 49, 50 to 59, 60 to 69, and
70 years), and, in the United States, race (white or black, the only groups with consistent definitions and large sample size in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES] data sets). To document changes in trends concurrent with flour fortification, we used 1998, the year implementation was completed in the United States and Canada, as the boundary point and conducted simple segmented log-linear regression of age-adjusted mortality rates in 1990 through 1997 versus 1998 through 2002. We tested for a significant difference between the regression lines for the 2 segments using the t test.20 We estimated the annual change in mortality rate before and after 1998 from the slope of the simple segmented log-linear regression. To estimate how many fewer deaths occurred each year after 1998, we used the 1990 to 1997 trend to predict 1998 to 2002 mortality rates and computed the difference between observed and predicted number of deaths.
Changes in Blood Values and Risk Factors in the United States
We conducted 2 additional analyses using NHANES data from the United States. We used data from NHANES III phase I (1988 to 1991), NHANES III phase II (1991 to 1994), and NHANES 1999 to 2000 to evaluate changes in blood folate and total homocysteine concentrations, as well as changes in the prevalence of major risk factors for stroke. We selected all participants except pregnant women who provided a blood sample and were
40 years of age and adjusted for the complex sampling design with SAS (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) or SUDAAN (Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC) statistical software. We estimated the geometric mean blood folate and total homocysteine concentrations by sex, race (white and black), and age group (40 to 59 and
60 years). Because blood homocysteine concentration was measured only during phase II of the NHANES III survey (19911994), we excluded phase I data from this analysis.
Serum folate concentrations were measured during the entire period of study using consistent methods, exhaustive quality control, and external proficiency testing.21 NHANES III phase II serum homocysteine concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography at the Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University.22 NHANES 1999 to 2000 plasma homocysteine concentrations were determined by a somewhat different high-performance liquid chromatography method at the CDCs NHANES Central Laboratory.23
Sensitivity Analysis
To evaluate the extent to which changes in known risk factors for stroke could affect mortality rates during the study period, we conducted a sensitivity analysis using NHANES data for the United States. We used a single age group (
40 years) to obtain stable estimates of 4 dichotomous risk factors: current cigarette smoking, hypertension, diabetes, and total serum cholesterol concentration
240 mg/dL, which together contribute to >75% of cardiovascular deaths.24 The population was partitioned into 16 strata, depending on the presence or absence of each of the 4 dichotomous risk factors. We assumed that total mortality associated with stroke is partitioned among these 16 strata as a function of the size of each group.20 We used NHANES data from before (NHANES III) and after (NHANES 1999 to 2000) fortification to obtain the joint distribution of risk factors, which were estimated from the published literature.2529 When the relative risks differed among studies, we used the average risk (Appendix Table I found in the online Data Supplement).
Because interaction effects for multiple risk factors are not well understood, we assumed multiplicative effects in the sensitivity analysis. We used a fixed background risk for disease and relative risks for mortality rates 3 years before and 3 years after fortification (1994 to 1996 versus 1999 to 2001) and varied the joint distribution of risk factors according to the NHANES data. This way, we obtained estimates for the variation in stroke mortality that would have occurred after fortification (1999 to 2001) because of changes in these risk factors alone. We also varied the values of the joint distribution of risk factors through the range of their 95% CIs to account for the variability of estimated prevalence of the risk factors. We performed the sensitivity analysis with the @RISK program (Palisade Corp, Newfield, NY) with 10 000 Monte Carlo simulations.
To evaluate the extent to which changes from ICD-9 to ICD-10 affect the observed stroke mortality trends, we conducted a sensitivity analysis of different values of the comparability ratios. We estimated annual percent change and 95% CIs of the age-adjusted stroke mortality rate for 1990 to 1997 versus 1998 to 2002, assuming that the comparability ratio was 50% or 25% lower or higher than the point estimate.
The authors had full access to the data and take full responsibility for its integrity. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
40 years of age or older after folic acid fortification in the United States (Figures 1 and 2
|
|
In the United States in 1990 to 2002, 1 963 024 records of whites or blacks listed stroke as the underlying cause of death. Whites accounted for 88% (1 734 766) of total stroke deaths. During this same period, 195 212 records listed stroke as the underlying cause of death among people in Canada, and 776 199 records listed stroke as the underlying cause of death among people in England and Wales.
Stroke mortality rates declined during this period in both men and women in all 3 countries (Figures 3 and 4
). Simple segmented log-linear regression showed a clear pattern of acceleration of the rate of decline in age-adjusted stroke mortality rates after 1998, when folic acid fortification was implemented, compared with the previous 8 years in nearly all of the groups studied in the United States and Canada (Table 1 and Figures 3 and 4
). In the United States, the estimated annual percent decline in stroke-related mortality rates among whites in all age and sex groups was
1.0%, with 1 exception, before fortification and increased to
2.7% after fortification. A similar effect was seen among blacks, with the annual decline increasing from 1.4% among men and 0.7% among women before fortification to 2.9% among men and 2.7% among women after fortification. These percentages translate into &12 900 fewer stroke deaths per year among people
40 years of age in the United States than if the trend established in 1990 to 1997 had continued without change (Table 1).
|
|
|
In Canada, the estimated annual percent decline in stroke-related mortality rates was 1.2% for men and 0.9% for women
40 years of age before fortification and increased to 5.6% for men and 5.4% for women after fortification. These percentages translate into &2800 fewer stroke deaths per year than if the trend established in 1990 to 1997 had continued without change (Table 1).
In contrast, there was no consistent change in the ongoing decline of age-adjusted stroke mortality in England and Wales after 1998 (Table 1 and Figures 3 and 4
). In fact, there were &1890 more stroke deaths in 1999 to 2002 than if the trend established in 1990 to 1997 had continued (Table 1).
Impact of Changes in Risk Factors in the United States
Sensitivity analysis based on changes in the prevalence of smoking, hypertension, diabetes, and serum total cholesterol concentration
240 mg/dL in the United States during the period of study predicted a 0.1% increase (2.5th to 97.5th centile, 5.2% decline to 5.3% increase) in stroke mortality after 1998 (Table 2). A 9.3% decline actually was observed.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The improvement in stroke mortality we observed in the United States and Canada appears to be largely independent of changes in all-cause mortality (Appendix Table II) and seems unlikely to be related to the change in coding from ICD-9 to ICD-10 (Appendix Table III). Chance is an unlikely explanation for our findings, given the statistical testing results.
It is unclear how much of the decline in stroke mortality is due to reduced incidence and how much to reduced case-fatality rate. Population-based data from the United States and Canada that would be helpful in assessing this are very limited. Age-adjusted rates of stroke hospitalization in the United States increased significantly from 1988 to 1997,33 and a Canadian study found stable age-adjusted stroke hospitalization rates in the Calgary Health Region from 1994 to 2002.34 The prevalence of nonfatal stroke was estimated from NHANES data to be 1.87% among noninstitutionalized 25- to 74-year-old people in the United States in 1991.35 A similar calculation based on 1999 to 2002 NHANES data yields a prevalence of 2.01% (SE=0.21). Thus, we find no evidence that stroke incidence decreased in the United States and Canada during the period studied. If this is true, the decline in stroke mortality we observed may be largely attributable to a reduced case-fatality rate.36
Our study is based on aggregate rather than individual data, but the setting makes it considerably more robust than a typical ecological study. Our analysis can be considered a national, population-based cohort study with quasi-experimental intervention because virtually the entire population was exposed to folic acid fortification, the biochemical effect of this exposure was demonstrated through population-based measurement of blood folate and homocysteine concentrations, and every death in the population was collected through national records. A similar approach has been used to demonstrate other population-wide changes associated with universal exposures.3,37,38
There is considerable evidence that elevated blood homocysteine concentration is an independent risk factor for stroke and that reduced blood homocysteine concentration is associated with a reduced risk for stroke.912 In a recent meta-analysis of 111 studies examining the association between the MTHFR C677T polymorphism and stroke, Casas and colleagues11 found that T-allele homozygotes, who have a greater mean homocysteine concentration than homozygotes for the C (wild-type) allele, also have a significantly increased risk for stroke. The authors of another recent meta-analysis of MTHFR C677T polymorphism studies stratified their analysis by continent to approximate folate status.12 The findings were consistent with the possibility that population-wide folic acid fortification helps to prevent stroke.12 Such "mendelian randomization" studies are largely free from confounding effects and support a causal link between blood homocysteine concentration and the risk for stroke.
A clinical trial that randomized 3318 adults to a folate-containing multivitamin supplement or placebo showed a 58% reduction in stroke-associated deaths among men (but not women) who took the supplements.39 Another randomized clinical trial in 3680 patients assessed the effect on stroke recurrence and other vascular end points of lowering blood homocysteine concentration by 2 µmol/L with high-dose B-vitamin (folate, B12, B6) treatment.40 No reduction in recurrent stroke was observed, but, as the authors noted,40 the studys statistical power was only 31% to detect a significant reduction of the combined number of stroke and coronary events because almost all patients were enrolled after folic acid fortification had occurred. A recent re-analysis of these data showed a 21% reduction in the risk for the combined end points in the high-dose group after exclusion of the subset of patients who were unlikely a priori to respond to B-multivitamin therapy.41
The Norwegian Vitamin (NORVIT) Study presented at the European Society of Cardiology in September 2005 randomized 3749 patients who had experienced an acute myocardial infarction within the previous 7 days into groups that received 4 different folic acid and B-vitamin combinations. After an average of 3.5 years follow-up, the study found no significant effect of folic acid treatment on cardiovascular disease risk despite producing a 25% reduction in average serum homocysteine concentration. This study cannot be fully assessed until it has been peer reviewed and its data are published, but it has already engendered considerable controversy because of its complex design and limited statistical power. Clearly, additional investigations of the effect of reducing blood homocysteine concentration on cardiovascular disease risk are needed.
Many factors, including large public health programs promoting heart disease and stroke prevention (see http://www.cdc.gov/cvh/state_program/index.htm), have probably contributed to the long-term decline of stroke mortality observed in the United States and Canada.14,15,42 Many lifestyle changes and treatments operate on stroke mortality through their effects on major established risk factors such as smoking, hypertension, and diabetes. These factors explain >75% of stroke mortality, but most showed little improvement or actually worsened during the 1990s (Appendix Table IV), so they are unlikely to be primary factors in the marked improvement in stroke mortality centered around the time of folic acid fortification.14,4351 Our sensitivity analysis is consistent with this assessment (Table 2). More widespread use of aspirin, statins, ß-blockers, ACE inhibitors, and revascularization procedures, as well as a decline in cigarette smoking, may also have affected stroke mortality in the late 1990s,14,15,42,5155 but such changes are likely to produce a gradual decline in the mortality rate, as was seen in England and Wales, rather than an abrupt population-wide improvement. The substantial improvement in stroke mortality we observed in the United States and Canada after 1998 in almost all racial, sex, and age groups studied, including those that traditionally benefit less or later from therapeutic advances and public health campaigns, also argues against an effect that operated solely through better treatment or amelioration of conventional risk factors.
In contrast, a population-wide impact could be expected from a population-based intervention such as folic acid fortification of enriched grain products. After fortification, we observed the expected changes in serum folate and homocysteine concentrations in all US population strata studied (Figures 1 and 2
). The timing of the accelerated decline in stroke mortality in our study is generally consistent with the timing of fortification, and the degree of decline is consistent with what was predicted9 for the change in blood homocysteine concentrations observed in the US population (Figures 1 and 2
).5 For example, the predicted improvements in stroke mortality based on the observed changes in homocysteine concentration were 9.0% for white men, 10.9% for white women, 12.8% for black men, and 8.4% for black women in the 3 years after fortification (1999 to 2001) in the United States. The observed average improvements were 11.3% for white men, 7.4% for white women, 15.0% for black men, and 9.0% for black women.
The epidemiological analysis presented here certainly does not establish causality, but the trends we observed are consistent with the hypothesis that folic acid fortification is contributing to a reduction in stroke deaths. Stroke and cardiovascular disease cause an extraordinary societal burden, and all effective prevention and treatment strategies ought to be implemented. If folic acid fortification is responsible for even a fraction of the accelerated improvement we observed, this public health benefit is an important bonus to the reduction in neural tube defect rates previously demonstrated.3 Moreover, these benefits accrue to all members of the population, regardless of ethnic, social, and economic barriers that have mitigated the benefits of many advances in prevention and treatment for women, ethnic minorities, the poor, and the uninsured.56
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the CDC.
Disclosures
None.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Related Article:
Circulation 2006 113: 1271.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Q.-H. Yang, L. D Botto, M. Gallagher, J. Friedman, C. L Sanders, D. Koontz, S. Nikolova, J D. Erickson, and K. Steinberg Prevalence and effects of gene-gene and gene-nutrient interactions on serum folate and serum total homocysteine concentrations in the United States: findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey DNA Bank Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2008; 88(1): 232 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. N. Rodionov and S. R. Lentz The Homocysteine Paradox Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., June 1, 2008; 28(6): 1031 - 1033. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Jentink, N. W. van de Vrie-Hoekstra, L. T. W. de Jong-van den Berg, and M. J. Postma Economic evaluation of folic acid food fortification in The Netherlands Eur J Public Health, June 1, 2008; 18(3): 270 - 274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Ueland and S. Hustad Homocysteine and Folate Status in an Era of Folic Acid Fortification: Balancing Benefits, Risks, and B-vitamins Clin. Chem., May 1, 2008; 54(5): 779 - 781. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Pfeiffer, J. D. Osterloh, J. Kennedy-Stephenson, M. F. Picciano, E. A. Yetley, J. I. Rader, and C. L. Johnson Trends in Circulating Concentrations of Total Homocysteine among US Adolescents and Adults: Findings from the 1991-1994 and 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys Clin. Chem., May 1, 2008; 54(5): 801 - 813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A D. Smith, Y.-I. Kim, and H. Refsum Is folic acid good for everyone? Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2008; 87(3): 517 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Hoey, H. McNulty, N. Askin, A. Dunne, M. Ward, K. Pentieva, J. Strain, A. M Molloy, C. A Flynn, and J. M Scott Effect of a voluntary food fortification policy on folate, related B vitamin status, and homocysteine in healthy adults Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2007; 86(5): 1405 - 1413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. S McCully Homocysteine, vitamins, and vascular disease prevention Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2007; 86(5): 1563S - 1568S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Weikert, J. Dierkes, K. Hoffmann, K. Berger, D. Drogan, K. Klipstein-Grobusch, J. Spranger, M. Mohlig, C. Luley, and H. Boeing B Vitamin Plasma Levels and the Risk of Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack in a German Cohort Stroke, November 1, 2007; 38(11): 2912 - 2918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B Bailey The rise and fall of blood folate in the United States emphasizes the need to identify all sources of folic acid Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2007; 86(3): 528 - 530. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. de Bree, L. A van Mierlo, and R. Draijer Folic acid improves vascular reactivity in humans: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2007; 86(3): 610 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M Pfeiffer, C. L Johnson, R. B Jain, E. A Yetley, M. F. Picciano, J. I Rader, K. D Fisher, J. Mulinare, and J. D Osterloh Trends in blood folate and vitamin B-12 concentrations in the United States, 1988 2004 Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2007; 86(3): 718 - 727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J F Ludvigsson, U de Faire, A Ekbom, and S M Montgomery Vascular disease in a population-based cohort of individuals hospitalised with coeliac disease Heart, September 1, 2007; 93(9): 1111 - 1115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Martin, B. Lindblad, and M. Norman Endothelial Function in Newborn Infants Is Related to Folate Levels and Birth Weight Pediatrics, June 1, 2007; 119(6): 1152 - 1158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q.-H. Yang, H. K Carter, J. Mulinare, R. Berry, J. Friedman, and J D. Eri |