Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2006;113:1278-1286
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.530592
CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zankov, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Horie, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zankov, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Horie, M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow ACE/Angiotension receptors
Right arrow Arrythmias-basic studies
Right arrow Ion channels/membrane transport

(Circulation. 2006;113:1278-1286.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Arrhythmia/Electrophysiology

Angiotensin II Potentiates the Slow Component of Delayed Rectifier K+ Current via the AT1 Receptor in Guinea Pig Atrial Myocytes

Dimitar P. Zankov, MD; Mariko Omatsu-Kanbe, PhD; Takahiro Isono, PhD; Futoshi Toyoda, PhD; Wei-Guang Ding, MD, PhD; Hiroshi Matsuura, MD, PhD; Minoru Horie, MD, PhD

From the Departments of Physiology (D.P.Z., M.O.-K., F.T., W.-G.D., H.M.) and Cardiovascular and Respiratory Medicine (D.P.Z., M.H.) and the Central Research Laboratory (T.I.), Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.

Correspondence to Minoru Horie, MD, PhD, Department of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga 520-2192, Japan. E-mail horie{at}belle.shiga-med.ac.jp

Received December 18, 2004; revision received January 10, 2006; accepted January 11, 2006.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Angiotensin II (Ang II) has diverse actions on cardiac electrical activity. Little information is available, however, regarding immediate electrophysiological effects of Ang II on cardiac repolarization.

Methods and Results— The present study investigated the immediate effects of Ang II on the slow component of delayed rectifier K+ current (IKs) and action potentials in guinea pig atrial myocytes using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique. Bath application of Ang II increased the amplitude of IKs (EC50, 6.16 nmol/L) concentration dependently. The stable analogue Sar1–Ang II was also effective at increasing IKs. The voltage dependence of IKs activation and the kinetics of deactivation were not significantly affected by these agonists. The enhancement of IKs was blocked by the Ang II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist valsartan (1 µmol/L) and was markedly attenuated by inclusion of GDPßS (2 mmol/L) in the pipette, indicating an involvement of G protein–coupled AT1 receptor. The stimulatory effect was also significantly reduced by the phospholipase C inhibitor compound 48/80 (100 µmol/L) and the protein kinase C inhibitors bisindolylmaleimide I (200 nmol/L) and H-7 (10 µmol/L), suggesting that AT1 receptor acts through phospholipase C–protein kinase C signaling cascade to potentiate IKs. As expected from its stimulatory action on IKs, Sar1–Ang II markedly shortened the action potential duration, which could be reversed by valsartan.

Conclusions— The potentiation of IKs via AT1 stimulation in atrial myocytes, accompanied by a shortening of the action potential duration, suggests a potential mechanism by which elevated levels of Ang II may promote atrial fibrillation in heart failure and warrants further investigation.


Key Words: action potentials • angiotensin • atrium • ion channels • receptors


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays a fundamental role in maintaining cardiovascular homeostasis, and disorders of the RAS are closely related to the development of hypertension, heart failure, atherosclerosis, cardiac hypertrophy, and myocardial and vascular remodeling.1–5 An octapeptide angiotensin II (Ang II) is the principal effector of the RAS and produces its potent and diverse biological actions by interacting with specific membrane receptors, namely Ang II type 1 (AT1) and type 2 (AT2) receptors. The AT1 receptors are widely distributed in a variety of cell and tissue types and mediate most of the known actions of Ang II, whereas the AT2 receptor is expressed mainly in the embryonic and neonatal states but is upregulated in adult tissues under some pathological conditions.6 The various biological actions of Ang II via AT1 receptor can be divided into the short-term effects that occur within minutes and the long-term effects that take place within hours or even later; vascular contraction constitutes the short-term events, whereas the long-term effects include a transcriptional response that leads to morphological and functional alterations of cardiovascular systems such as cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis, and remodeling.7

Clinical Perspective p 1286

There is increasing evidence that the RAS is also associated with the occurrence of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias in experimental animals,8,9 and recent clinical studies have proved that blockade of the RAS with ACE inhibitors or AT1 antagonists is effective for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF).10,11 The shortening of action potential duration (APD) and effective refractory period can be regarded as one of the main factors responsible for the occurrence of reentry-based tachyarrhythmias such as AF. Little information is available, however, regarding the effect of Ang II on repolarizing K+ currents and resultant changes in APD in cardiac myocytes.

It has been demonstrated in various mammalian species, including humans, that the delayed rectifier K+ current (IK) consists of rapidly and slowly activating components (IKr and IKs, respectively), which are the major repolarizing outward currents of atrial and ventricular action potentials.12 IKr and IKs reflect the expression of distinct molecular entities; the pore-forming {alpha}-subunit KvLQT1 (KCNQ1) coassembles with an accessory ß subunit minK (KCNE1) to form the IKs channels, and the HERG (KCNH2) constitutes the pore-forming subunit of the channel that underlies the IKr channels. Mutations in genes encoding these channel proteins are responsible for the long-QT syndrome in humans, an inherited cardiac arrhythmia characterized by abnormal cardiac repolarization and a high risk for sudden death.13 IKs also represents a relevant target for modulation by autonomic neurotransmitters and hormones and thereby mediates the regulation of cardiac electrical activity and contraction by these extracellular signaling molecules.

The present study was designed to examine the possible regulation of IKs by Ang II and its associated signaling pathways in isolated guinea pig atrial myocytes using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique. Our results show for the first time that Ang II in nanomolar concentrations markedly potentiates IKs through a mechanism involving activation of the G protein–coupled AT1 receptor linked to the phospholipase C (PLC)–protein kinase C (PKC) pathway.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Preparation of Atrial Myocytes
The experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with The Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the US National Institute of Health (NIH publication 85–23, revised 1996). Single atrial myocytes were enzymatically dissociated from the heart of adult Hartley guinea pigs as described previously.14

Solutions and Chemicals
Normal Tyrode’s solution contained (in mmol/L) 140 NaCl, 5.4 KCl, 1.8 CaCl2, 0.5 MgCl2, 0.33 NaH2PO4, 5.5 glucose, and 5.0 HEPES (pH adjusted to 7.4 with NaOH). The standard external solution for measuring IKs was normal Tyrode’s solution supplemented with 0.4 µmol/L nisoldipine (a generous gift from Bayer AG, Wuppertal-Elberfeld, Germany) and 5 µmol/L E-4031 (Wako, Osaka, Japan). Agents added to the external solution included Ang II (human; Calbiochem, San Diego, Calif, and Sigma, St Louis, Mo), Sar1–Ang II (Sigma), 1-(5-isoquinolinesulfonyl)-2-methylpiperazine (H-7, Seikagaku, Tokyo, Japan), bisindolylmaleimide I (Bis I, Sigma), phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA; Sigma), 1-oleoyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycerol (OAG; Sigma), KT5720 (Alomone Labs, Jerusalem, Israel), valsartan (a generous gift from Novartis, Basel, Switzerland), and candesartan (a generous gift from Takeda Pharmaceutical Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan). The control pipette solution contained (in mmol/L) 70 potassium aspartate, 50 KCl, 10 KH2PO4, 1 MgSO4, 3 Na2-ATP, 0.1 Li2-GTP, 5 EGTA, and 5 HEPES (pH adjusted to 7.2 with KOH). The concentration of free Ca2+ and Mg2+ in the pipette solution was calculated to be &1.5x10–10 mol/L (pCa, 9.8) and 3.7x10–5 mol/L (pMg=4.4), respectively. In some experiments, 0.1 mmol/L GTP was replaced with 2 mmol/L GDPßS (trilithium salt, Roche), and 5 mmol/L EGTA was substituted with 20 mmol/L BAPTA (Sigma). To inhibit PLC, compound 48/80 (Sigma) was added to the pipette solution.

Whole-Cell Patch-Clamp Techniques and Data Analysis
Isolated atrial myocytes were current and voltage clamped using the standard whole-cell patch-clamp technique with an EPC-8 patch-clamp amplifier (HEKA Electronics, Lambrecht, Germany). Borosilicate glass electrodes had tip resistances of 2.5 to 4.0 M{Omega} when filled with the pipette solution. IKs was elicited by depolarizing voltage-clamp steps given from a holding potential of –50 mV to various test potentials under conditions in which the Na+ current was inactivated by setting the holding potential to –50 mV, and ICa,L and IKr were blocked by nisoldipine (0.4 µmol/L) and E-4031 (5 µmol/L), respectively, added to the external solution for the measurement of IKs.14 The effect of external application of Ang II or Sar1–Ang II on IKs was tested after the initial rundown of IKs within 3 to 5 minutes of patch rupture was allowed to reach a steady-state level, and control records were obtained immediately before drug exposure in each experiment. Action potentials were evoked at a rate of 0.2 Hz with suprathreshold current pulses of 2- to 3-ms duration applied via patch electrode in the current-clamp mode. The APD was measured at 90% repolarization (APD90). All experiments were performed at 36±1°C.

The concentration-response relationship for the potentiation of IKs by Ang II was drawn by least-squares fit of a Hill equation: R=Rmax/{1+(EC50/[agonist])nH}, where Rmax represents the maximal degree of potentiation expressed as a percentage, EC50 is the concentration giving half-maximal potentiation, and nH is the Hill coefficient. Voltage dependence of IKs activation was evaluated by fitting the normalized I-V relationship of tail currents to a Boltzmann equation: IK,tail=1/{1+exp[(V1/2–Vm)/k]}, where IK,tail is the tail current amplitude normalized with reference to the maximum value measured at 50 mV, V1/2 is the voltage at half-maximal activation, Vm is the test potential, and k is the slope factor. Time course for the decay of the IKs tail current was fitted with the sum of 2 exponential functions: IK,tail=Af exp(–t/{tau}f)+As exp(–t/{tau}s), where Af and As represent amplitudes of the fast and slow components, respectively, and {tau}f and {tau}s are time constants for the fast and slow components, respectively.

Time courses of changes in the amplitude of IKs in the presence of various reagents were determined by measuring the amplitude of tail currents elicited on repolarization to a holding potential of –50 mV after 2000-ms depolarization to 30 mV every 10 or 20 seconds.

Statistical Analysis
All averaged values presented are mean±SEM. Statistical comparisons were made by Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired data. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare unpaired data between 2 groups; the Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to compare data among ≥3 groups. A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

The authors had full access to the data and take full responsibility for its integrity. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Stimulatory Action of Ang II and Sar1–Ang II on IKs in Guinea Pig Atrial Myocytes
Figure 1A and 1B demonstrates the representative examples for the stimulatory effect of Ang II and its stable analogue Sar1–Ang II, respectively, on IKs in guinea pig atrial myocytes. Atrial myocytes were depolarized from a holding potential of –50 mV to test potentials of –40 to 50 mV for 2000 ms, before and during exposure to 1 µmol/L Ang II (Figure 1A) or 100 nmol/L Sar1–Ang II (Figure 1B). Both Ang II and Sar1–Ang II markedly increased the slowly activating outward currents during depolarizations and the decaying tail currents on return to the holding potential, which represented the activation and deactivation of IKs, respectively. The potentiation of IKs by Ang II and Sar1–Ang II was quantitatively evaluated by measuring the amplitude of tail currents elicited on return to the holding potential after a 2000-ms test pulse to 30 mV. As demonstrated in Figure 1C, 1 µmol/L Ang II and 100 nmol/L Sar1–Ang II increased the amplitude of IKs by 60.8±6.8% (n=8) and 100.7±16.4% (n=8), respectively. The percent increase in the amplitude of IKs tail current thus calculated was plotted against concentrations of Ang II (Figure 1D). The mean data could be well described by a Hill equation with an EC50 of 6.16 nmol/L and nH of 1.50.


Figure 1
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Enhancement of IKs by Ang II and Sar1–Ang II. A, B, IKs was activated by 2000-ms depolarizing pulses to test potentials of –40 to 50 mV in 10-mV steps before (Control) and &4 minutes after exposure to 1 µmol/L Ang II (A) or 100 nmol/L Sar1–Ang II (B). A and B were obtained from different myocytes. C, Percent increase in the amplitude of IKs tail current evoked by 1 µmol/L Ang II and 100 nmol/L Sar1–Ang II (n=8 each), measured after 2000-ms depolarization to 30 mV. D, Concentration-response relationship for the increase of IKs tail current evoked by Ang II at concentrations between 1 and 1000 nmol/L. Each value is the mean, and error bars represent SEM of 4 to 6 measurements. Only 1 concentration of Ang II was examined in a given cell to exclude the influence of possible desensitization to the agonist.

We then examined whether Ang II and Sar1–Ang II affected the voltage dependence of IKs activation by measuring the amplitude of tail currents elicited on return to a holding potential of –50 mV after 2000-ms depolarizing pulses to test potentials of –40 to 50 mV. Figure 2A illustrates a representative example of I-V relationships for IKs tail currents recorded before and during exposure to 1 µmol/L Ang II obtained from the experiment of Figure 1A. The tail current amplitude at each test potential was then normalized with reference to the maximum value at 50 mV, and mean values for the normalized tail currents, obtained from 6 experiments, were plotted against test potentials (Figure 2B). The data points were reasonably well fitted by a Boltzmann equation, with V1/2 of 10.4±1.5 mV and k of 11.1±0.8 mV for control and V1/2 of 12.2±2.5 mV and k of 10.3±1.1 mV for Ang II (n=6). Thus, the voltage dependence of IKs activation was found to be affected little, if at all, by Ang II. In a separate set of experiments, it was also confirmed that Sar1–Ang II increased the amplitude of IKs without appreciably affecting the voltage dependent activation of IKs (V1/2 of 10.1±2.2 mV and k of 11.8±1.3 mV; n=6).


Figure 2
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effects of Ang II and Sar1–Ang II on the voltage dependence of activation and the kinetics of deactivation. A, I-V relationships for IKs tail currents elicited on return to a holding potential of –50 mV after 2000-ms depolarization to various test potentials before and during exposure to 1 µmol/L Ang II. B, I-V relationships for normalized IKs tail currents. Smooth curves represent the least-squares fit of the data points (mean±SEM of 6 cells) to a Boltzmann equation. C, Semilogarithmic plot of IKs tail current elicited on repolarization to –50 mV after a 2000-ms voltage step to 30 mV under control conditions. Inset, Original current trace used for the analysis ({tau}f=76 ms, {tau}s=342 ms). D, Summarized data for {tau}f and {tau}s in control and during exposure to 1 µmol/L Ang II and 100 nmol/L Sar1–Ang II.

To examine whether the kinetics of IKs deactivation was affected by Ang II and Sar1–Ang II, the tail currents elicited on return to –50 mV after depolarizing pulses were evaluated by fitting to the sum of 2 exponential functions (Figure 2C). The time constants for the fast ({tau}f) and slow ({tau}s) components averaged 69.6±10.8 and 305.6±57.6 ms for control, 77.7±6.2 and 233.0±31.9 ms for Ang II, and 69.4±12.0 and 297.2±71.7 ms (n=6) for Sar1–Ang II, respectively (Figure 2D). There are no significant differences in the values of {tau}f and {tau}s among control, Ang II, and Sar1–Ang II groups, suggesting that the kinetics of current deactivation at –50 mV was not significantly affected by Ang II and Sar1–Ang II.

Signal Transduction Pathways Involved in AT1 Receptor–Mediated Increase in IKs
We proceeded to explore the signal transduction pathways mediating the stimulatory action of Ang II and Sar1–Ang II on IKs. To examine whether the IKs response to Ang II and Sar1–Ang II was mediated through the AT1 receptor, the effect of these agonists on IKs was examined in the presence of the selective AT1 receptor antagonist valsartan.15 As illustrated in Figure 3A, pretreatment of atrial myocytes with 1 µmol/L valsartan almost totally prevented the stimulatory action of 100 nmol/L Sar1–Ang II on IKs. In a total of 8 myocytes, Sar1–Ang II (100 nmol/L) potentiated IKs by 15.6±4.6% in the presence of valsartan (1 µmol/L), which is significantly smaller than the degree of the IKs potentiation in the absence of valsartan (100.7±16.4% increase; n=8, P<0.05; Figure 3C). Similarly, the potentiation of IKs by 1 µmol/L Ang II was almost totally abolished by pre-exposure to 1 µmol/L valsartan (control, 60.8±6.8% increase, n=8; valsartan, 8.5±3.4% increase, n=8; P<0.05). These observations support the view that the potentiation of IKs by Ang II and Sar1–Ang II is mediated through the AT1 receptor. Moreover, valsartan alone had minimal effect on baseline IKs (7.8±2.9% increase, n=7; Figure 3C), suggesting that valsartan prevents the stimulatory action of Ang II and Sar1–Ang II by blocking the binding of these agonists to the AT1 receptor.


Figure 3
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Potentiation of IKs by Sar1–Ang II is mediated via AT1 receptor. A, Effect of Sar1–Ang II (100 nmol/L) on IKs in the presence of valsartan (1 µmol/L). B, Effect of candesartan (2 µmol/L) on IKs under baseline conditions. C, Summarized data for percent increase in the amplitude of IKs tail current evoked by Sar1–Ang II (1 µmol/L), Sar1–Ang II (1 µmol/L) plus valsartan (1 µmol/L), valsartan (1 µmol/L) alone, and candesartan alone at concentrations of 100 nmol/L and 2 µmol/L.

To explore whether the AT1 receptor is tonically activated to potentiate IKs in guinea pig atrial myocytes, we examined the effect of candesartan, the inverse agonist of the AT1 receptor,16 on IKs in basal conditions. As demonstrated in Figure 3B and 3C, the baseline IKs was not appreciably affected by exposure to candesartan at concentrations of 100 nmol/L and 2 µmol/L, which suggests that there is little, if any, tonic activation of AT1 receptor leading to the enhancement of IKs in baseline conditions of guinea pig atrial myocytes.

It has been demonstrated in various cell types, including guinea pig cardiac myocytes,7,17 that the AT1 receptor is coupled to the activation of PLC via heterotrimeric G proteins, which results in production of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (InsP3), a Ca2+-mobilizing second messenger, and diacylglycerol (DAG), an activator of PKC. Both an elevation in intracellular free Ca2+ and activation of PKC have been associated with an enhancement of IKs in guinea pig cardiac myocytes.18 We therefore tested whether these signaling molecules are involved in an AT1 receptor–mediated increase in IKs. Because the stable analogue Sar1–Ang II evokes a larger increase in the amplitude of IKs than Ang II does (Figure 1C), we used Sar1–Ang II as an agonist at the AT1 receptor in subsequent experiments.

We examined whether G protein activation is involved in the signal transduction pathway by internally perfusing the nonhydrolysable GDP analogue GDPßS that irreversibly inhibits G protein activation. As illustrated in Figure 4A, the stimulatory effect of Sar1–Ang II on IKs was greatly reduced in atrial myocytes dialyzed with 2 mmol/L GDPßS (control, 100.7±16.4% increase, n=8; GDPßS, 15.9±7.0% increase, n=7; P<0.05), indicating that G-protein activation mediates the potentiation of IKs via AT1 receptor. As shown in Figure 4B, the potentiation of IKs by Sar1–Ang II was also significantly attenuated by loading the myocytes with the PLC inhibitor compound 48/80 at 100 µmol/L (compound 48/80, 32.9±9.9% increase, n=9), supporting an involvement of PLC activation.


Figure 4
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Evaluation of the involvement of G proteins, PLC, or intracellular free Ca2+ in the potentiation of IKs by AT1 receptor stimulation. A–C, Effects of internal application of 2 mmol/L GDPßS (A), 100 µmol/L compound 48/80 (B), or 20 mmol/L BAPTA (C) on the response of IKs to 100 nmol/L Sar1–Ang II. These reagents were allowed to dialyze into the cell for at least 4 minutes before bath application of Sar1–Ang II. D, Summarized data for percent increase in IKs by 100 nmol/L Sar1–Ang II in myocytes dialyzed with control pipette solution and pipette solutions containing GDPßS, compound 48/80, or BAPTA.

The finding that Ang II and Sar1–Ang II potentiate IKs in myocytes dialyzed with a control pipette solution containing 5 mmol/L EGTA suggests that intracellular free Ca2+ does not play an essential role in mediating the potentiation of IKs via AT1 receptor. This idea was further tested by dialyzing atrial myocytes with BAPTA in place of EGTA, which should provide more rapid and more efficient Ca2+-buffering conditions inside the cells. As shown in Figure 4C, 100 nmol/L Sar1–Ang II increased the amplitude of IKs even in the myocyte loaded with 20 mmol/L BAPTA to an extent similar to that in the controls (BAPTA, 76.0±11.5% increase, n=4), indicating that the stimulatory effect of Sar1–Ang II was not significantly affected by an increased Ca2+-buffering capacity achieved by BAPTA. This observation can be interpreted to indicate that intracellular free Ca2+ is not critically involved in the AT1 receptor–mediated IKs increase under the present experimental conditions.

To test whether PKC mediates the IKs response to AT1 receptor stimulation, we investigated the effect of PKC inhibitors and activators on the stimulatory action of Sar1–Ang II. As illustrated in Figure 5A and 5B, the stimulatory action of Sar1–Ang II was largely abolished by pretreatment of atrial myocytes either with the nonspecific PKC inhibitor H-7 (16.0±9.2% increase, n=4) or with the specific PKC inhibitor Bis I (9.8±6.4% increase, n=5). These results strongly suggest that the potentiation of IKs via the AT1 receptor involves PKC activation. We also checked whether Sar1–Ang II could further increase IKs after potentiation by maximal PKC activation. In guinea pig atrial myocytes, increasing the concentration of the nonspecific PKC activator PMA above 300 nmol/L produced no further increase in the amplitude of IKs (data not shown), indicating that a maximal potentiation of IKs was attained by 300 nmol/L PMA (44.5±5.6% increase, n=4). As illustrated in Figure 5C, Sar1-Ang produced little further increase in IKs that was prestimulated maximally with 300 nmol/L PMA (7.7±2.3% increase, n=7; Figure 5E). When these reagents were applied in reverse order (first Sar1–Ang II and then PMA), there was again only a little further increase in IKs during exposure to PMA (6.2±1.0% increase, n=5; data not shown). These observations suggest that Sar1–Ang II and PMA activated the same signaling pathway to potentiate IKs. The involvement of PKC activation was supported further by the observation that Sar1–Ang II caused only a small additional increase in IKs after a maximal potentiation by the selective PKC activator OAG at 20 µmol/L (Figure 5D; 10.1±1.5% increase, n=9; Figure 5E).


Figure 5
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Enhancement of IKs via AT1 receptor is mediated through PKC activation. A, C, D, Time course for changes in the amplitude of IKs tail current during exposure to Sar1–Ang II (100 nmol/L) in the presence of 10 µmol/L H-7 (A), 300 nmol/L PMA (C), or 20 µmol/L OAG (D). B, E, Summarized data for percent increase in IKs evoked by Sar1–Ang II in the presence of the PKC inhibitors H-7 and Bis I (B) and PKC activators PMA and OAG (E). P<0.05, H-7, Bis I, PMA, or OAG group vs control.

To rule out the possible involvement of protein kinase A (PKA) in the AT1-evoked potentiation of IKs, the effect of Sar1–Ang II (100 nmol/L) was examined in the presence of the selective PKA inhibitor KT5720. As demonstrated in Figure 6A and 6B, there were no significant differences in the degree of IKs potentiation by Sar1–Ang II in the absence and presence of KT5720 (200 nmol/L), thus supporting the view that PKA activation is not involved in the AT1-mediated potentiation of IKs. Taken together, our results indicate that IKs potentiation by AT1 receptor is mediated primarily through the PKC activation.


Figure 6
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. PKA activation is not involved in the enhancement of IKs via the AT1 receptor. A, Time course of changes in the amplitude of IKs tail current during exposure to 100 nmol/L Sar1–Ang II in the presence of 200 nmol/L KT5720. B, Percentage increase in IKs evoked by Sar1–Ang II in the absence and presence of KT5720.

Shortening of APD by AT1 Receptor Stimulation
Because cardiac repolarization is shaped on a subtle balance of multiple ionic channel activities, an alteration in amplitude of major repolarizing currents such as IKs would lead to substantial changes in the repolarization process. We therefore examined the net effect of Sar1–Ang II on action potentials in guinea pig atrial myocytes during superfusion with normal Tyrode’s solution with no added blockers for ionic channels. Figure 7A represents superimposed traces of action potentials recorded before and during exposure to Sar1–Ang II (100 nmol/L) and after the agonist was washed out. Sar1–Ang II markedly shortened APD, which was almost totally reversed on washing out of the agonist. In a separate set of experiments (Figure 7B), we confirmed that the Sar1–Ang II (100 nmol/L)–induced shortening of APD was significantly reversed by the subsequently applied valsartan (1 µmol/L). In a total of 12 myocytes, APD90 was reduced from a control value of 113.1±8.8 to 63.1±5.8 ms during exposure to Sar1–Ang II, which was partially recovered to 88.1±7.0 ms (n=10) by the subsequent application of valsartan (Figure 7C). The resting membrane potential (control, –84±3 mV; Sar1–Ang II, –83±2 mV; n=8) and action potential amplitude (control, 120±9 mV; Sar1–Ang II, 118±6 mV; n=8) remained unchanged during exposure to Sar1–Ang II.


Figure 7
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. AT1 receptor–mediated shortening of the APD in atrial myocytes. A, Superimposed action potentials recorded before and &2 minutes after exposure to 100 nmol/L Sar1–Ang II and &5 minutes after the Sar1–Ang II was washed out. B, Superimposed action potentials recorded before and during exposure to Sar1–Ang II, initially without and then with 1 µmol/L valsartan. C, Summarized data for changes in APD90 by exposure to Sar1–Ang II, without and then with valsartan.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The present experiments demonstrate that stimulation of the AT1 receptor evokes a marked increase in the amplitude of IKs in guinea pig atrial myocytes. Ang II is effective at potentiating IKs at concentrations of ≥&1 nmol/L (Figure 1D), which appears to be higher compared with the plasma level of Ang II in humans at baseline conditions (&5 pmol/L).19 However, Ang II is also stored in cardiomyocytes, is secreted by various stimuli such as mechanical stress, and acts as autocrine/paracrine factors.20 A previous study found that the concentration of Ang II in the interstitial fluid space of dog heart is &6 nmol/L,21 which seems to be comparable to the concentration needed to affect IKs in cardiac myocytes.

It has been shown in various tissue and cell types that AT1 receptors are coupled predominantly to PLC via heterotrimeric G protein Gq, which leads to the hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate to produce InsP3 and DAG.7 InsP3 stimulates its receptors on the sarcoplasmic reticulum to mobilize intracellular Ca2+ stores; DAG activates Ca2+-dependent (conventional) and Ca2+-independent (novel) isoforms of PKC. The present results are consistent with activation of the AT1 receptor linked to a G protein (probably Gq)–PLC signaling pathway to mediate the stimulatory action of Ang II on IKs (Figures 3 and 4Up). The involvement of resultant activation of PKC in the action of Ang II is supported by the experiments using the inhibitors and activators of PKC; the stimulatory action of Ang II was greatly reduced by the presence of Bis I and H-7 and was masked by previous application of PMA and OAG (Figure 5). At present, the precise mechanism by which PKC regulates IKs remains to be fully elucidated. The recent mutagenesis study has detected PKC phosphorylation sites (S409, S464, T513, and S577) in the C-terminus of KCNQ1 protein, responsible for potentiating the KCNQ1/KCNE1 channel,22 the molecular constituents of human IKs.13 However, it is also possible that PKC acts on nonchannel substrate(s) to enhance IKs. Further studies are thus required to clarify the molecular basis for PKC-mediated regulation of IKs.

Adult guinea pig myocardium has been demonstrated to express the {alpha}, ßII, {gamma}, {epsilon}, and {zeta} isoforms of PKC.23 The observation that IKs can be readily enhanced not only by PMA and OAG but also by AT1 stimulation in a strong Ca2+ buffering of the cytoplasm (5 mmol/L EGTA) suggests the possibility that the Ca2+-independent novel isoform PKC{epsilon}, rather than Ca2+-dependent conventional PKC isoforms, is preferentially involved in the IKs response under the present experimental conditions. It has recently been reported that the KCNQ1/KCNE1 channel heterologously expressed in Xenopus oocytes is potentiated by both PKCßII and PKC{epsilon}.24 It will be interesting to examine which isoform of PKC mediates the potentiation of IKs via AT1 receptors in atrial myocytes.

It was previously demonstrated in guinea pig ventricular myocytes that Ang II decreases IKs but increases IKr,25 which is apparently in contrast to the present results concerning the effect of Ang II on IKs. One possible explanation could be the different method of dissecting IK into its 2 components, IKr and IKs. Consistent with this, our preliminary results showed that Sar1–Ang II (100 nmol/L) did not evoke any appreciable inhibitory effect on IKs in guinea pig ventricular myocytes when evaluated with the present experimental protocol shown in Figure 1 (unpublished observation). Alternatively, intracellular signaling pathways coupled to the AT1 receptor might be dissimilar between atrial and ventricular myocytes. It was also shown that in guinea pig hearts, AT1 receptor in atria has a higher affinity for Ang II than that in ventricles.26

Previous studies have shown that AF itself causes progressive electrophysiological remodeling (shortening of effective refractory period) in the atria by affecting the expression and function of several ion channels.27,28 It has recently been demonstrated that an upregulation of AT1 receptors, which occurs in the left atrium of patients with lone AF and AF with mitral valve disease, is closely related to the remodeling process and stabilization of AF.29 Consistent with this notion, it was also reported that electrical remodeling during experimental AF is prevented by the AT1 antagonist candesartan in dogs.30 The AT1 receptor–mediated shortening of APD via potentiation of IKs (Figure 7) might be the another way through which Ang II participates in electrophysiological perturbation in the atria during AF. On the other hand, the present observation that a drastic shortening of atrial APD by AT1 stimulation can be substantially reversed after addition of the AT1 antagonist valsartan could explain why the incidence of newly developed AF is decreased in patients (with heart failure) who receive the drug (Val-HeFT trial).31 It should be noted, however, that a possible direct blockade of repolarizing currents other than IKs by valsartan could also contribute to the reversal of APD shortening observed in this study (Figure 7B and 7C).

In recent years, a prospective, randomized trial has demonstrated that in patients with persistent AF cardioverted to sinus rhythm, adding the AT1 antagonist irbesartan to amiodarone is more effective in maintaining sinus rhythm compared with treatment with amiodarone alone.10 In this trial, the benefit of irbesartan is largely ascribed to the reduction of the immediate and so-called subacute (during 1 hour and the first weeks after cardioversion, respectively) recurrences of AF. The immediate reversal of APD shortening by AT1 blockade (Figure 7) may again contribute at least partly to this advantage of irbesartan in preventing relapses of AF in the initial short-term phase.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by grant-in-aid for scientific research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. We thank Tadanori Sugimoto (Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co, Ltd, Suita, Osaka, Japan) for his help with statistical analyses.

Disclosures

None.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Griendling KK, Lassegue B, Alexander W. Angiotensin receptors and their therapeutic implications. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1996; 36: 281–306.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Opie LH, Sack MN. Enhanced angiotensin II activity in heart failure: reevaluation of the counterregulatory hypothesis of receptor subtypes. Circ Res. 2001; 88: 654–658.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Ross R. Atherosclerosis: an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 115–126.[Free Full Text]
  4. Higaki J, Aoki M, Morishita R, Kida I, Taniyama, Tomita N, Yamamoto K, Moriguchi A, Kaneda Y, Ogihara T. In vivo evidence of the importance of cardiac angiotensin-converting enzyme in the pathogenesis of cardiac hypertrophy. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20: 428–434.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Paradis P, Dali-Youcef N, Paradis FW, Thibault G, Nemer M. Overexpression of angiotensin II type I receptor in cardiomyocytes induces cardiac hypertrophy and remodeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97: 931–936.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. de Gasparo M, Catt KJ, Inagami T, Wright JW, Unger TH. International Union of Pharmacology, XXIII: the angiotensin II receptors. Pharmacol Rev. 2000; 52: 415–472.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Touyz RM, Schiffrin EL. Signal transduction mechanisms mediating the physiological and pathophysiological actions of angiotensin II in vascular smooth muscle cells. Pharmacol Rev. 2000; 52: 639–672.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Kumagai K, Nakashima H, Urata H, Gondo N, Arakawa K, Saku K. Effects of angiotensin II type I receptor antagonist on electrical and structural remodeling in atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41: 2197–2204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Harada K, Komuro I, Hayashi D, Sugaya T, Murakami K, Yazaki Y. Angiotensin II type 1a receptor is involved in the occurrence of reperfusion arrhythmias. Circulation. 1998; 97: 315–317.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Madrid AH, Bueno MG, Rebollo JMG, Marín I, Pena G, Bernal E, Rodriguez A, Cano L, Cano JM, Cabeza P, Moro C. Use of irbesartan to maintain sinus rhythm in patients with long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation: a prospective and randomized study. Circulation. 2002; 106: 331–336.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Fletcher RD, Cintron GB, Johnson G, Orndorff J, Carson P, Cohn JN, for the V-HeFT II VA Cooperative Studies Group. Enalapril decreases prevalence of ventricular tachycardia in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Circulation. 1993; 87 (suppl VI): VI-49–VI-55.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Wang Z, Fermini B, Nattel S. Rapid and slow components of delayed rectifier current in human atrial myocytes. Cardiovasc Res. 1994; 28: 1540–1546.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Keating MT, Sanguinetti MC. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of cardiac arrhythmias. Cell. 2001; 104: 569–580.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Ding WG, Toyoda F, Matsuura H. Regulation of cardiac IKs potassium current by membrane phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 50726–50734.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Criscione L, de Gasparo M, Buhlmayer P, Whitebread S, Ramjoue HP, Wood J. Pharmacological profile of valsartan: a potent, orally active, nonpeptide antagonist of the angiotensin II AT1-receptor subtype. Br J Pharmacol. 1993; 110: 761–771.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Zou Y, Akazawa H, Qin Y, Sano M, Takano H, Minamino T, Makita N, Iwanaga K, Zhu W, Kudoh S, Toko H, Tamura K, Kihara M, Nagai T, Fukamizu A, Umemura S, Iiri T, Fujita T, Komuro I. Mechanical stress activates angiotensin II type 1 receptor without the involvement of angiotensin II. Nat Cell Biol. 2004; 6: 499–506.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Paul K, Ball NA, Dorn II GW, Walsh RA. Left ventricular stretch stimulates angiotensin II-mediated phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis and protein kinase C{epsilon} isoform translocation in adult guinea pig hearts. Circ Res. 1997; 81: 643–650.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Tohse N, Kameyama M, Irisawa H. Intracellular Ca2+ and protein kinase C modulate K+ current in guinea pig heart cells. Am J Physiol. 1987; 253: H1321–H1324.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Bragat AC, Blumenfeld J, Sealey JE. Effect of high-performance liquid chromatography on plasma angiotensin II measurements in treated and untreated normotensive and hypertensive patients. J Hypertens. 1997; 15: 459–465.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Sadoshima J, Xu Y, Slayter HS, Izumo S. Autocrine release of angiotensin II mediates stretch-induced hypertrophy of cardiac myocytes in vitro. Cell. 1993; 75: 977–984.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Dell’Italia LJ, Meng QC, Balcells E, Wei CC, Palmer R, Hageman GR, Durand J, Hankes GH, Oparil S. Compartmentalization of angiotensin II generation in the dog heart: evidence for independent mechanisms in intravascular and interstitial spaces. J Clin Invest. 1997; 100: 253–258.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Kathöfer S, Röckl K, Zhang W, Thomas D, Katus H, Kiehn J, Kreye V, Schoels W, Karle C. Human ß3-adrenoreceptors couple to KvLQT1/MinK potassium channels in Xenopus oocytes via protein kinase C phosphorylation of the KvLQT1 protein. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2003; 368: 119–126.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Takeishi Y, Jalili T, Ball NA, Walsh RA. Responses of cardiac protein kinase C isoforms to distinct pathological stimuli are differentially regulated. Circ Res. 1999; 85: 264–271.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Xiao GQ, Mochly-Rosen D, Boutjdir M. PKC isozyme selective regulation of cloned human cardiac delayed slow rectifier K current. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003; 306: 1019–1025.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Daleau P, Turgeon J. Angiotensin II modulates the delayed rectifier potassium current of guinea pig ventricular myocytes. Pflugers Arch. 1994; 427: 553–555.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Baker KM, Singer HA. Identification and characterization of guinea pig angiotensin II ventricular and atrial receptors: coupling to inositol phosphate production. Circ Res. 1988; 62: 896–904.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Bosch RF, Zeng X, Grammer JB, Popovic K, Mewis C, Kühlkamp V. Ionic mechanisms of electrical remodeling in human atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Res. 1999; 44: 121–131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Allessie M, Ausma J, Schotten U. Electrical, contractile and structural remodeling during atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Res. 2002; 54: 230–246.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Boldt A, Wetzel U, Weigl J, Garbade J, Lauschke J, Hindricks G, Kottkamp H, Gummert JF, Dhein S. Expression of angiotensin II receptors in human left and right atrial tissue in atrial fibrillation with and without underlying mitral valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 42: 1785–1792.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Nakashima H, Kumagai K, Urata H, Gondo N, Ideishi M, Arakawa K. Angiotensin II antagonist prevents electrical remodeling in atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2000; 101: 2612–2617.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Maggioni AP, Latini R, Carson PE, Singh SN, Barlera S, Glazer R, Masson S, Ceré E, Tognoni G, Cohn JN. Valsartan reduces the incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure: results from the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT). Am Heart J. 2005; 149: 548–557.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Heart failure is associated with activation of the renin-angiotensin system and with atrial fibrillation (AF). We investigated the effects of angiotensin (Ang) II and its stable analogue Sar1–Ang II on IKs that contributes to repolarization in the atrium and ventricle. In guinea pig atrial myocytes, Ang II and Sar1–Ang II increased the amplitude of IKs by activating the Ang II type 1 receptor coupled to a G protein–phospholipase C-protein kinase C signaling pathway. As expected from this stimulatory action on IKs, Sar1–Ang II markedly shortens the action potential duration, and this electrophysiological effect is reversed by the Ang II type 1 receptor antagonist valsartan. Because shortening of refractoriness promotes reentry, these results suggest a potential mechanism by which elevated levels of Ang II may promote AF in heart failure that warrants further investigation. Reversal of these electrophysiological effects might be a mechanism through which Ang II antagonists can reduce AF.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
A. Goette and U. Lendeckel
Electrophysiological effects of angiotensin II. Part I: signal transduction and basic electrophysiological mechanisms
Europace, February 1, 2008; 10(2): 238 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
R. Due-Andersen, T. Hoi-Hansen, N. V. Olsen, C. E. Larroude, J. K. Kanters, F. Boomsma, U. Pedersen-Bjergaard, and B. Thorsteinsson
Cardiac repolarization during hypoglycaemia and hypoxaemia in healthy males: impact of renin-angiotensin system activity
Europace, February 1, 2008; 10(2): 219 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. Christ, E. Wettwer, and U. Ravens
Letter by Christ et al Regarding Article, "Angiotensin II Potentiates the Slow Component of Delayed Rectifier K+ Current via the AT1 Receptor in Guinea Pig Atrial Myocytes"
Circulation, October 31, 2006; 114(18): e565 - e565.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. P. Zankov, M. Omatsu-Kanbe, F. Toyoda, W.-G. Ding, H. Matsuura, T. Isono, and M. Horie
Response to Letter Regarding Article, "Angiotensin II Potentiates the Slow Component of Delayed Rectifier K+ Current via the AT1 Receptor in Guinea Pig Atrial Myocytes"
Circulation, October 31, 2006; 114(18): e566 - e566.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zankov, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Horie, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zankov, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Horie, M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow ACE/Angiotension receptors
Right arrow Arrythmias-basic studies
Right arrow Ion channels/membrane transport