Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2005;112:I-383-I-389
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.523464
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Langer, F.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Langer, F.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, D. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow CV surgery: valvular disease

(Circulation. 2005;112:I-383 – I-389.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Surgery for Valvular Heart Disease

Subvalvular Repair

The Key to Repairing Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation?

Frank Langer, MD; Filiberto Rodriguez, MD; Saskia Ortiz, MD; Allen Cheng, MD; Tom C. Nguyen, MD; Mary K. Zasio, BA; David Liang, MD, PhD; George T. Daughters, MS; Neil B. Ingels, PhD; D. Craig Miller, MD

From the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (F.L., F.R., S.O., A.C., T.C.N., M.K.Z., G.T.D., N.B.I., D.C.M.), and Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (D.L.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; and Laboratory of Cardiovascular Physiology and Biophysics (G.T.D., N.B.I.), Research Institute of the Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Palo Alto, Calif.

Correspondence to Dr D. Craig Miller, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Falk Cardiovascular Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305. E-mail dcm{at}stanford.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Residual or recurrent mitral regurgitation frequently occurs after mitral ring annuloplasty repair for ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR), because annuloplasty primarily addresses annular dilatation. We describe a subvalvular repair technique addressing posterior papillary muscle (PPM) displacement.

Methods and Results— Ten sheep had radiopaque markers placed on the left ventricle (LV) and mitral apparatus. A suture was anchored at the right fibrous trigone, passed through the PPM tip and LV wall, and exteriorized through a tourniquet (STRING-1). A second suture was anchored transmurally in the high septum (anterobasal LV wall) and passed through the PPM and LV wall (STRING-2). Reversible posterolateral ischemia was induced by temporarily occluding the proximal circumflex artery. Under open chest conditions, 3D marker coordinates were obtained with biplane videofluoroscopy at baseline and during acute ischemia before and after tightening of each STRING using transesophageal echocardiography to grade IMR. IMR decreased (mean±SEM, 2.0±0.1 to 1.2±0.1; P<0.05) when STRING-1 was tightened, did not change after tightening STRING-2 (2.3±0.1 to 2.3±0.1), and decreased after tightening both sutures (STRING-1+2, 2.3±0.2 to 1.3±0.2; P<0.05). STRING-1 and STRING-1+2 (STRING-1, 1.7±0.4 mm; STRING-2, 0.7±0.5 mm; STRING-1+2, 1.5±0.3 mm; P<0.05) resulted in significant PPM basal repositioning. Tightening of any STRING sutures did not affect anterior mitral leaflet excursion.

Conclusions— Basal repositioning of the PPM with STRING-1 reduced acute IMR without concomitant annular reduction. This technique may be a useful adjunct if residual IMR is likely after undersized ring annuloplasty.


Key Words: ischemic mitral regurgitation • mitral valve • mitral valve repair


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Ring annuloplasty is the preferred repair technique for ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR)1, but residual or recurrent mitral regurgitation (MR) is seen in up to 30% of patients.2–6 Although undersized annular reduction can correct both annular and subvalvular geometry in IMR,7 annular reduction with ring annuloplasty primarily addresses the annular dilatation in IMR, and leaflet tethering because of posterior papillary muscle (PPM) displacement often persists, which can result in early or midterm repair failure.3,4

Experimental studies have suggested repositioning of the PPM to ameliorate IMR via surgical infarct plication8 or by placing and adjusting an external patch with an inflatable balloon over the infarction territory.9 Infarct restraint has also been shown to attenuate remodeling and reduce chronic IMR.10 Cutting second-order chordae has also been proposed to reduce leaflet tethering, but chordal cutting depresses global left ventricular (LV) systolic function.11 Clinically, only the "edge-to-edge" technique of Alfieri et al12 has been used as an adjunctive repair technique in combination with ring annuloplasty; however, midterm results of this approach have been discouraging.13

Recently, Kron et al14 reported successful internal direct repositioning of the displaced PPM as an adjunct to ring annuloplasty using a subvalvular transventricular suture to anchor the PPM to the mitral annulus just posterior to the right fibrous trigone. Building on this report and based on our observation from a previous experiment15 that chronic IMR was associated with significant PPM posterolateral displacement, we tested the hypothesis that direct internal repositioning of the PPM reduces IMR. We evaluated 2 different repositioning directions to identify a preferred method for this repair approach without concomitant annular size reduction.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Surgical Preparation.
Ten sheep (68±5 kg) were premedicated with ketamine (25 mg/kg IM), and anesthesia was induced with sodium thiopental (6.8 mg/kg IV) and maintained with inhalational isoflurane (1% to 2.5%). Through a left thoracotomy, miniature tantalum myocardial markers (#2 to 14, Figure 1A) were inserted in the LV epicardial layer along 4 equally spaced longitudinal meridians, with 1 marker at the LV apex (#1, Figure 1A). A snare was placed around the left circumflex artery proximal to the first obtuse marginal branch for induction of reversible posterolateral myocardial ischemia sufficient in severity and duration to result in acute IMR. After establishment of cardiopulmonary bypass, the ascending aorta was cross-clamped. Cardioplegia was induced by retrograde infusion of crystalloid cardioplegic solution. A left atriotomy was performed, and tantalum markers were placed at the tips and bases of both anterior papillary muscle (#28 and #29) and PPM (#30 and #31). Eight markers were sutured around the circumference of the mitral annulus [1 near each commissure (#16 and #20) and 3 along the septal (#15, #21, and #22) and lateral (#17, #18, and #19) annulus (Figure 1A and 1B). Leaflet edge markers were sutured to the ventricular side of the anterior mitral leaflet (AML) and posterior mitral leaflet (PML) edges at the leaflet center (#25 and #26, Figure 1B). Markers were also sutured to the atrial side along the midlines of the AML (#23 and #24, Figure 1B) and PML (#27, Figure 1B).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. (A) Schematic representation of the radiopaque marker array used in this study. (B) Schematic representation of the radiopaque annular and leaflet markers utilized in this study. (C) Schematic representation of the different repositioning directions. The technique as described by Kron et al14 is indicated by a black arrow, the STRING-1 suture is indicated by a blue arrow, and STRING-2 by a yellow arrow. (ACOM indicates anterior commissure; PCOM, posterior commissure; APM, anterior papillary muscle; PPM, posterior papillary muscle).

A suture (2-0 polypropylene) was anchored at the right fibrous trigone (marker #21, Figure 1B and 1C) using a Teflon felt pledget, passed through the PPM tip and the posterior LV wall, and was exteriorized through a tourniquet (STRING-1). A second suture was anchored transmurally at the anterobasal LV wall (right side of the LAD, adjacent to marker #4, Figure 1A and 1C) using a Teflon felt pledget and also passed through the PPM tip and LV wall (STRING-2).

The atriotomy was closed, the heart deaired, the cross-clamp removed, and the heart defibrillated (mean cardiopulmonary bypass time 87±5 minutes, aortic cross-clamp time 52±3 minutes, dopamine 4.6±0.7 µg/kg–1/min–1). A pressure transducer (Millar SPC-500, Millar Instruments, Inc.) was placed in the LV chamber through the apex.

Experimental Protocol
The animals were transferred to the catheterization laboratory and studied intubated with the chest open. Anesthesia was maintained with inhalational isoflurane (1% to 2.5%). Animals received 100 mg of lidocaine (IV) as prophylaxis against rhythm disturbances. A micromanometer-tipped catheter (Millar SPC-500, Millar Instruments, Inc.) zeroed in a 37°C water bath was introduced through a left carotid sheath and advanced to the aortic arch for aortic blood pressure measurement. Simultaneous biplane videofluoroscopic marker data and hemodynamic data were acquired at baseline, during circumflex ischemia, and during ischemia after tightening of the tourniquets. Each sequence (baseline, ischemia, and ischemia+tightening) was repeated for each STRING intervention, and was designated as "preischemia" (preischemia-1, preischemia-2, or preischemia-3), "ischemia" (ischemia-1, ischemia-2, or ischemia-3), and "STRING" (STRING-1, STRING-2, or STRING-1+2), respectively. The severity of IMR was graded by an experienced cardiologist (D.L.) according to the extent and width of the color Doppler regurgitant jet visualized with transesophageal echocardiography and categorized as none (0), trace (0.5+), mild (1+), moderate (2+), moderate to severe (3+), or severe (4+).16 The data sequence ischemia was started at the onset of at least moderate IMR (time range, 45 to 120 s). The tension on the STRING suture was adjusted according to the observed effect on echocardiography to avoid overcorrection of papillary muscle position causing leaflet prolapse.

All of the animals received humane care in compliance with the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care formulated by the National Society for Medical Research and the Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals prepared by the National Academy of Sciences and published by the National Institutes of Health. This study was approved by the Stanford University Medical School Laboratory Research Animal Review committee and conducted according to Stanford University policy.

Data Acquisition
A Philips Optimus 2000 biplane Lateral ARC 2/poly DIAGNOST C2 system (Philips Medical Systems) was used to record videofluoroscopic images at 60 Hz, with the animal in the right lateral position with ventilation arrested at end expiration and the image intensifiers in the 9-inch mode. 2D images from each of the 2 X-ray views (45o right anterior oblique and 45o left anterior oblique) were digitized and merged to yield 3D coordinates for each radiopaque marker every 16.7 ms using custom software.17 The accuracy of 3D reconstructions from biplane videograms of length measurements, expressed as mean percentage error of a known marker-to-marker 3D length, has been shown to be 0.2% with a reproducibility of 1%.18 Analog LV pressure (LVP), aortic pressure, and ECG voltage were digitized simultaneously and recorded along with marker images during data acquisition.

Data Analysis
Cardiac Cycle Timing and Hemodynamics
For each cardiac cycle, end systole (ES) was defined as the videofluroscopic frame immediately before the peak rate of change of falling LV pressure (–dP/dt), and end diastole was defined as the frame containing the maximum positive second-time derivative of LVP, corresponding with the frame immediately before the upstroke of the LVP curve. Instantaneous LV volume was calculated every 16.7 ms from the epicardial LV and mitral annular markers using a space-filling multiple tetrahedral model constructed from the marker coordinates and corrected for LV convexity.19 Although epicardial LV volume calculated in this manner overestimates true LV chamber volume (because it incorporates an unknown amount of LV muscle mass), changes in this "epicardial" LV volume are accurate measurements of the relative changes in LV chamber volume, because LV muscle mass remains constant throughout the cardiac cycle.20

Papillary Muscle Geometry
To characterize precisely the end-systolic PPM tip 3D displacements, marker coordinates were transformed from their original laboratory reference frame to a right-handed Cartesian coordinate system with the origin at the midseptal annulus (saddle horn, marker #22, Figure 1A and 1B), the positive lateral axis directed toward the midlateral annulus (marker #18), the positive apical axis passing through the LV apex (marker #1), and the positive posterior axis directed toward the posterior commissure (marker #20). The total end-systolic PM tip displacements because of ischemia and the repositioning with the STRING interventions were resolved into their lateral, apical, and posterior components.

Mitral Valve Dynamics
Opening and closing of the AML were assessed by calculating the AML excursion angle ({theta}) defined by lines through the middle of the septal and lateral mitral annulus (#22 to #18, Figures 1B and 2 Down) and leaflet base and the center leaflet edge markers, respectively (#22 to #25, Figures 1B and 2Down). Leaflet excursion was calculated as the range (maximum to minimum angle) of the respective leaflet angles throughout the cardiac cycle.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the radiopaque annular and leaflet markers defining leaflet angle. AML indicates anterior mitral leaflet; PML, posterior mitral leaflet.

Mitral Annular Geometry
Mitral annular area was calculated as the sum of the areas of 8 triangles formed by consecutive adjacent marker pairs on the annulus (#15 to #22, Figure 1B) and the annular centroid, without assumption of planar geometry. Annular septal-lateral diameter was calculated as the distance in 3D space between the 2 markers placed in the middle of the septal and lateral mitral annulus (#22 and #18, Figure 1B).

Statistical Analysis
All of the data are reported as mean±1 SEM. Hemodynamic and marker-derived data from 2 consecutive steady-state beats were time-aligned at end systole, and data from these beats were averaged for each animal and data acquisition run. Comparisons between the different conditions were made using a repeated-measures ANOVA after normal distribution had been tested by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. In the case of a non-Gaussian distribution, Friedman’s repeated-measures ANOVA on ranks was applied. If ANOVA yielded a significant F value (P<0.05), Dunnett’s test was applied for post-hoc testing with ischemia as the control condition.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Table 1 summarizes group mean hemodynamic data for preischemia, ischemia, and STRING for each STRING sequence (ie, 1, 2, and 1+2). During ischemia, IMR occurred, LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes increased significantly, whereas LV dP/dt decreased. None of the 3 different STRING-interventions affected heart rate, LV volumes, or pressures. MR, however, was reduced with STRING-1 (2.0±0.1 to 1.2±0.1; P<0.05) and STRING-1+2 (2.3±0.2 to 1.3±0.2; P<0.05) but remained unchanged with STRING-2 (2.3±0.1 to 2.3±0.1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Hemodynamic Data

Table 2 summarizes PPM tip displacements during ischemia, as well as the repositioning with the STRING interventions. Only STRING-1 and STRING-1+2 were associated with basal repositioning of the displaced PPM (Figure 3a–3c).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. End-Systolic PPM Tip Displacement and Repositioning



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. (A) Schematic representation of the end-systolic posterior papillary muscle tip displacement with ischemia (significant shifts shown in red) and repositioning with STRING-1 (significant shifts shown in green). Data shown as mean ±SEM. *P<0.05, repeated-measures ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-test vs ischemia. (B) Schematic representation of the end-systolic posterior papillary muscle tip displacement with ischemia (significant shifts shown in red) and repositioning with STRING-2. Data shown as mean ±SEM. *P<0.05, repeated-measures ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-test versus ischemia. (C) Schematic representation of the end-systolic posterior papillary muscle tip displacement with ischemia (significant shifts shown in red) and repositioning with STRING-1+2 (significant shifts shown in green). Data shown as mean ±SEM. *P<0.05, repeated-measures ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-test vs ischemia.

Table 3 summarizes AML leaflet motion. Ischemia reduced maximal and minimal AML excursion angles, although total leaflet excursion remained unchanged. Importantly, none of the STRING interventions affected AML motion, and both maximal and minimal AML excursion angles were preserved.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Anterior Mitral Leaflet Motion

Table 4 summarizes mitral annular dynamics. As expected septal-lateral diameter, as well as mitral annular area, increased during ischemia. Tightening STRING-1 prevented additional septal-lateral dilation and annular area increase, although progressive annular dilatation occurred with both STRING-2 and STRING-1+2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Mitral Annular Dynamic Motion


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The results of this study support the following conclusions: (1) basal repositioning of the displaced PPM reduces acute IMR in this ovine model; and (2) AML excursion remains unchanged with subvalvular sutures in situ.

Chronic IMR is a common and important complication after myocardial infarction and is associated with poor prognosis.1,21 Despite surgical advances, IMR remains a vexing problem in cardiac surgery.22 Ring annuloplasty, the standard surgical treatment1,21 in most centers, has frustratingly variable results and is frequently associated with residual and recurrent MR in up to 30% of patients.2–6

Clinical and experimental studies have elucidated the pathogenesis of chronic IMR.15,23–30 Annular dilatation causes Carpentier type-I leaflet dysfunction, and in a large subset of patients, restricted leaflet motion (Carpentier type-IIIb) results from PPM displacement with associated leaflet tethering. Although undersized annular reduction can correct both annular and subvalvular geometry in IMR7, annuloplasty primarily addresses the annular dilatation, and even undersized ring annuloplasty fails to eliminate the component of leaflet tethering.3,4 Based on this mechanistic insight, several adjunctive techniques have been proposed. Liel-Cohen et al8 reported improvement of IMR with infarct plication using plicating sutures, whereas Moainie et al10 suggested an infarct restraint using a Marlex mesh patch. Hung et al9 proposed external repositioning of the displaced PM using an epicardial Dacron patch containing an inflatable balloon, which is adjusted under echo guidance. Internal PM repositioning has been evaluated in this laboratory by Timek et al31 using interpapillary sutures, although this approach failed to improve IMR in our experimental setting. In a small clinical series, however, Hvass et al32 reported successful results using a similar internal repositioning approach. A different approach to eliminate leaflet tethering was described by Messas et al,33,34 who reduced IMR by cutting second-order chordae, although such chordal cutting has been shown to depress global LV systolic function11 and fails to uniformly correct the IMR35 in our experimental setting. Finally, the Coapsys device, which consists of anterior and posterior epicardial pads connected by a subvalvular chord, intends to reduce annular septal-lateral diameter and relocate the PPM. Improvement of functional MR in a tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy model has been reported using this device,36 and its use for IMR is currently under investigation in clinical trials (RESTOR-MV and TRACE). All of these adjunctive techniques represent experimental work; clinically, only the Alfieri edge-to-edge technique has been used in a larger patient population. This technique, however, showed discouraging midterm results according to the experience of the Cleveland Clinic.13

Recently, Kron et al14 reported the successful use of a new adjunctive technique in a clinical case series. This approach includes internal direct repositioning of the displaced PM using a subvalvular transventricular suture anchoring the PM to the mitral annulus aiming posterior to the right fibrous trigone. Based on this report and on the geometric distortions associated with chronic IMR reported by Tibayan et al15 that the distance between the midseptal fibrous annulus and the PPM tip plays a key role, we tested the hypothesis that internal direct repositioning of the PPM toward the fibrous annulus improves IMR. In the current investigation, we evaluated 2 different repositioning directions (right fibrous trigone and anterobasal LV) to identify the preferred approach for this innovative adjunct.

Papillary Muscle Tip Position
Consistent with previous publications for acute37 and chronic IMR,15 we observed posterolateral displacement of the PPM tip at end systole during acute posterolateral ischemia. Although repositioning of the PPM toward the anterobasal LV (STRING-2) failed to reduce IMR in this experiment, repositioning toward the right fibrous trigone with STRING-1 resulted in reduced MR. Only this latter technique resulted in basal repositioning of the displaced PPM, and combining both techniques (STRING 1+2) did not result in additional improvement. Since our group reported that undersized annuloplasty may result in improved subvalvular geometry,7 the efficacy of this subvalvular technique was tested without concomitant annuloplasty in the present experiment. In a previous experiment involving sheep with posterolateral infarcts and resulting chronic IMR, we demonstrated that the Kron technique does not reduce IMR in the absence of concomitant annular reduction.38 We hypothesize, however, that a different repositioning direction with a suture between right fibrous trigone and PPM tip, which reduced acute IMR in the present experiment without annular reduction, could be even more effective in the clinical setting when combined adjunctively with ring annuloplasty, as proposed by Kron et al.14 Also, the right fibrous trigone is a safe location for the repair suture, because a suture placed at the midseptal annular saddle horn could result in severe aortic regurgitation if the adjacent noncoronary aortic cusp is inadvertently involved.

Leaflet Excursion
A major concern with the use of subvalvular repair sutures is impaired leaflet excursion. With the repair sutures tightened, we did not observe decreased excursion of the AML. Furthermore, we postulate that the presence of a subvalvular repair suture could help prevent LV outflow tract obstruction by a systolic anterior movement of the AML. Although the incidence of systolic anterior movement after mitral valve repair for IMR is rare in general, it might occur with profound downsizing of the mitral annulus in the presence of a hypovolemic and hypercontractile hemodynamic condition.

Mitral Annular Dynamics
Annular dilatation plays a key role in the pathogenesis of IMR.27,30,39 As expected, increase of septal-lateral diameter, as well as mitral annular area during acute posterolateral ischemia, were observed in this experiment. Interestingly, septal-lateral diameter and annular area did not increase additionally with STRING-1 tightened, although progressive annular dilatation was observed with STRING-2 and STRING-1+2. Because the concept of a STRING repair suture is intended as an adjunctive repair technique in conjunction with ring annuloplasty, the clinical relevance of the observed annular dynamics is limited.

Summary
In this study of the 3D distortions of the mitral valve apparatus associated with acute ischemia, direct internal PPM repositioning toward the right fibrous trigone resulted in improvement of IMR. Of interest, excursion of the AML remained unchanged with the repair sutures tightened. As originally proposed by Kron et al,14 this adjunctive surgical reparative technique might help prevent residual or recurrent MR after mitral valve annuloplasty repair. The annuloplasty addresses the annular component of IMR, whereas the adjunctive technique corrects the subvalvular changes. In patients with confirmed Carpentier type IIIb leaflet motion on preoperative and intraoperative echocardiographic assessment of the mechanism of MR, our experimental findings may well be translated into clinical practice with the repair suture connecting the right fibrous trigone and the PPM tip placed at the time of the annuloplasty and tied loosely. After weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass, the repair result will be evaluated by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiographical. If residual MR is observed after annuloplasty, the tension on the repair suture is adjusted under echocardiographical guidance with the final knots tied to eliminate or reduce the residual MR. If no residual MR occurs after annuloplasty, the suture is tied with minimal tension, and this suture will be equivalent to a tertiary chord that might prevent recurrent MR postrepair, because it limits additional PPM displacement in the continued LV remodeling process.3

Study Limitations
The investigation of acute IMR in open-chest sheep who previously had normal hearts is far different from the clinical scenario of chronic IMR. Also, distinct differences in cardiac anatomy, including annular, leaflet, PM, and coronary anatomy between sheep and humans, are well known.24,25 Thus, direct extrapolation of the present experimental findings is inappropriate. Proximal circumflex artery occlusion resulted in both annular dilatation and PPM displacement, which mimics 2 pathophysiologic causal components of chronic IMR. Nevertheless, additional studies in chronic IMR animal models or human subjects are needed to investigate this new adjunctive suture repair method when used with ring annuloplasty.

The tension on the STRING sutures was neither predetermined in terms of desired repositioning distance nor measured by a force transducer. The tension on the tourniquet was adjusted according to the echocardiographic effect. Although we cannot speculate on the durability of this type of repair in the clinical setting, placement of artificial chordae using polytetrafluoroethylene sutures in mitral valve repair is associated with encouraging midterm results.40 In fact, with the use of polytetrafluoroethylene sutures, a repair suture connecting the right fibrous trigone and PPM tip (like our STRING-1) can be considered as an artificial tertiary chord, which may help prevent recurrent IMR as result of continued LV remodeling.3


*    Acknowledgments
 
Supported by grants HL-29589 and HL-67025 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. F.L., F.R., A.C. were Carl and Leah McConnell Cardiovascular Surgical Research Fellows. F.L. was supported by the Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina, Halle, Germany. F.R. was supported by grant HL67025–01S1 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and was also a recipient of an American College of Surgeons Resident Research Scholarship Award. A.C. and T.C.N. were recipients of the Thoracic Surgery Foundation Research Fellowship Award. We appreciate the superb technical assistance provided by Maggie Brophy, Katha Gazda, and Dr Mark Grisedale, as well as the help with the design of the present experiment provided by Drs Hans-Joachim Schäfers (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospitals Homburg, Germany), Frederick A. Tibayan, and Tomasz Timek.


*    Footnotes
 
Presented at the 77th Annual Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association, New Orleans, La, November 7–10, 2004.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Gillinov AM, Wierup PN, Blackstone EH. Is repair preferable to replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001; 122: 1125–1141.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Tahta SA, Oury JH, Maxwell JM. Outcome after mitral valve repair for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Heart Valve Dis. 2002; 11: 11–18.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Hung J, Papakostas L, Tahta SA. Mechanism of recurrent ischemic mitral regurgitation after annuloplasty: continued LV remodeling as a moving target. Circulation. 2004; 110: II85–II90.
  4. Matsunaga A, Tahta SA, Duran CM. Failure of reduction annuloplasty for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Heart Valve Dis. 2004; 13: 390–397.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. von Oppell UO, Stemmet F, Brink J. Ischemic mitral valve repair surgery. J Heart Valve Dis. 2000; 9: 64–73.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. McGee EC, Gillinov AM, Blackstone EH. Recurrent mitral regurgitation after annuloplasty for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004; 128: 916–924.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Tibayan FA, Rodriguez F, Langer F. Mitral suture annuloplasty corrects both annular and subvalvular geometry in acute ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Heart Valve Dis. 2004; 13: 414–420.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Liel-Cohen N, Guerrero JL, Otsuji Y. Design of a new surgical approach for ventricular remodeling to relieve ischemic mitral regurgitation: insights from 3-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation. 2000; 101: 2756–2763.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Hung J, Guerrero JL, Handschumacher MD. Reverse ventricular remodeling reduces ischemic mitral regurgitation: echo-guided device application in the beating heart. Circulation. 2002; 106: 2594–2600.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Moainie SL, Guy TS, Gorman JH 3rd. Infarct restraint attenuates remodeling and reduces chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation after postero-lateral infarction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002; 74: 444–449.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Rodriguez F, Langer F, Harrington KB. Importance of mitral valve second-order chordae for left ventricular geometry, wall thickening mechanics, and global systolic function. Circulation. 2004; 110: II115–II122.
  12. Alfieri O, Maisano F, De Bonis M. The double-orifice technique in mitral valve repair: a simple solution for complex problems. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001; 122: 674–681.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Bhudia SK, McCarthy PM, Smedira NG. Edge-to-edge (Alfieri) mitral repair: results in diverse clinical settings. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004; 77: 1598–1606.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Kron IL, Green GR, Cope JT. Surgical relocation of the posterior papillary muscle in chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002; 74: 600–601.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Tibayan FA, Rodriguez F, Zasio MK. Geometric distortions of the mitral valvular-ventricular complex in chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2003; 108: II116–II121.
  16. Helmcke F, Nanda NC, Hsiung MC. Color Doppler assessment of mitral regurgitation with orthogonal planes. Circulation. 1987; 75: 175–183.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Niczyporuk MA, Miller DC. Automatic tracking and digitization of multiple radiopaque myocardial markers. Comput Biomed Res. 1991; 24: 129–142.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Daughters GT, Sanders WJ, Miller DC. A comparison of two analytical systems for three-dimensional reconstruction from biplane videoradiograms. Proc Comp Cardiol (IEEE). 1988; 15: 79–82.
  19. DeAnda A Jr, Moon MR, Nikolic SD. A method to assess endocardial regional longitudinal curvature of the left ventricle. Am J Physiol. 1995; 268: H2553–H2560.
  20. Moon MR, Castro LJ, DeAnda A. Effects of left ventricular support on right ventricular mechanics during experimental right ventricular ischemia. Circulation. 1994; 90: II92–II101.
  21. Grossi EA, Goldberg JD, LaPietra A. Ischemic mitral valve reconstruction and replacement: comparison of long-term survival and complications. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001; 122: 1107–1124.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Miller DC. Ischemic mitral regurgitation redux-to repair or to replace? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001; 122: 1059–1062.[Free Full Text]
  23. Yiu SF, Enriquez-Sarano M, Tribouilloy C. Determinants of the degree of functional mitral regurgitation in patients with systolic left ventricular dysfunction: a quantitative clinical study. Circulation. 2000; 102: 1400–1406.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Llaneras MR, Nance ML, Streicher JT. Large animal model of ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994; 57: 432–439.[Abstract]
  25. Llaneras MR, Nance ML, Streicher JT. Pathogenesis of ischemic mitral insufficiency. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993; 105: 439–442.[Abstract]
  26. Gorman JH 3rd, Gorman RC, Plappert T. Infarct size and location determine development of mitral regurgitation in the sheep model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998; 115: 615–622.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Gorman JH 3rd, Gorman RC, Jackson BM. Distortions of the mitral valve in acute ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997; 64: 1026–1031.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Gorman RC, McCaughan JS, Ratcliffe MB. Pathogenesis of acute ischemic mitral regurgitation in three dimensions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995; 109: 684–693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Gorman JH 3rd, Jackson BM, Gorman RC. Papillary muscle discoordination rather than increased annular area facilitates mitral regurgitation after acute posterior myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1997; 96: II124–II127.
  30. Tibayan FA, Rodriguez F, Langer F. Annular remodeling in chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation: ring selection implications. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003; 76: 1549–1554.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Timek TA, Lai DT, Tibayan F. Annular versus subvalvular approaches to acute ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2002; 106: I27–I32.
  32. Hvass U, Tapia M, Baron F. Papillary muscle sling: a new functional approach to mitral repair in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction and functional mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003; 75: 809–811.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Messas E, Guerrero JL, Handschumacher MD. Chordal cutting: a new therapeutic approach for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2001; 104: 1958–1963.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Messas E, Pouzet B, Touchot B. Efficacy of chordal cutting to relieve chronic persistent ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2003; 108: II111–II115.
  35. Rodriguez F, Langer F, Harrington KB. Cutting second-order chords does not prevent acute ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2004; 110: II91–II97.
  36. Inoue M, McCarthy P, Popovic Z. The Coapsys device to treat functional mitral regurgitation: in vivo long-term canine study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004; 127: 1068–1077.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Lai DT, Timek TA, Tibayan FA. The effects of mitral annuloplasty rings on mitral valve complex 3-D geometry during acute left ventricular ischemia. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002; 22: 808–816.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Tibayan FA, Rodriguez F, Langer F, Zasio MK, Bailey L, Liang D, Daughters GT, Ingels NB, Miller DC. Annular or subvalvular approach to chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005; 129: 1266–1275.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Gorman JH 3rd, Gorman RC, Jackson BM. Annuloplasty ring selection for chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation: lessons from the ovine model. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003; 76: 1556–1563.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Duebener LF, Wendler O, Nikoloudakis N. Mitral-valve repair without annuloplasty rings: results after repair of anterior leaflet versus posterior-leaflet defects using polytetrafluoroethylene sutures for chordal replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000; 17: 206–212.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Langer, F.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Langer, F.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, D. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow CV surgery: valvular disease