Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2005;112:I-224-I-228
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.525378
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seeburger, J.
Right arrow Articles by Aebert, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seeburger, J.
Right arrow Articles by Aebert, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow CV surgery: other

(Circulation. 2005;112:I-224 – I-228.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Myocardial Protection and Vascular Biology

Gene Expression Changes in Leukocytes During Cardiopulmonary Bypass Are Dependent on Circuit Coating

Joerg Seeburger, BSc; Jan Hoffmann, MSc; Hans Peter Wendel, PhD; Gerhard Ziemer, MD; Hermann Aebert, MD

From the Department of Thoracic, Cardiac, and Vascular Surgery, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany.

Correspondence to Dr Hermann Aebert, Department of Thoracic, Cardiac, and Vascular Surgery, Eberhard Karls University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str 3, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany. E-mail hermann.aebert{at}med.uni-tuebingen.de


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) results in a systemic inflammatory response. Leukocytes play a crucial role in inflammatory reactions. Their gene expression profile in the context of CPB is unknown.

Methods and Results— In a prospective, randomized, and double-blind clinical trial, 12 male patients underwent elective coronary artery bypass grafting with either heparin-coated (group H) or protein-coated (group P) CPB circuits. Oligonucleotide microarray analyses of 22 283 genes were performed on circulating leukocytes, collected immediately before surgery and 6 hours after CPB. Microarray results were validated with real-time polymerase chain reaction. All patients had uneventful surgery, and no significant differences between groups were observed during the clinical course. Multiple statistical analyses with different methods were performed. Compared with preoperative expression at a threshold value of P<0.01, postoperative expression revealed 814 upregulated and 1187 downregulated genes in group H compared with 99 upregulated and 231 downregulated in group P (P<0.001). Fifty genes exhibited a >4-fold increase and 27 exhibited a >4-fold decrease in group H, whereas only 7 genes exhibited upregulation and 7 revealed downregulation in group P. Microarray-pathway-profile-finder analyses determined 1405 upregulated and 1454 downregulated pathways in group H compared with 552 upregulated and 818 downregulated pathways in group P (P<0.01). Pathways related to inflammatory response exhibited highest z scores in group H, reflecting cellular inflammatory activation.

Conclusions— Heparin coating resulted in a more profound alteration in leukocyte gene expression when compared with protein coating. Microarray analyses present an innovative approach for the evaluation and understanding of inflammatory reactions associated with CPB.


Key Words: cardiopulmonary bypass • genes • inflammation • leukocytes


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusion
down arrowReferences
 
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with a profound systemic inflammatory response.1,2 The interaction of blood with artificial surfaces activates numerous plasma protein systems and blood cells, causing multiple organ disturbances, edema, decreased myocardial contractility, and thorough changes in vascular resistance.3–5 Surface modification of CPB circuits has been pursued to reduce clinical complications and improve patient outcome.6,7 Gene expression analyses using high-density oligonucleotide probe arrays enable profiling of gene expression in tens of thousand of genes.8 In the present study, we evaluated gene expression in circulating leukocytes after CPB with different circuit coatings using microarray analyses.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusion
down arrowReferences
 
Experimental Setting
This prospective, randomized, and double-blind clinical trial was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all of the patients. Twelve male White individuals undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were randomized to group H (heparin-coated circuits) and group P (protein-coated circuits). Exclusion criteria were ejection fraction <0.30; left ventricular end-diastolic pressure >20 mm Hg; pulmonary, renal, or hepatic failure; insulin-dependent diabetes; acute infections; obesity (body mass index ≥30); emergency and reoperations; and use of antiinflammatory drugs including aspirin during the 5 days preceding surgery. All of the patients received the same routine intraoperative and perioperative treatment. CPB consisted of a Type S III pump (Stoeckert), the QUADROX HMO 1010 oxygenator, the QUART arterial filter, the VHK 4201 reservoir, and a standard tube setting (all Maquet). In group H, all of the circuit components were coated with covalent-bounded heparin (Bioline-Coating, Maquet).7 In group P, the total CPB surface was modified with recombinant albumin (Safeline-Treatment, Maquet). Anesthesia was performed using Propofol (6 to 12 mg/kg), Sufentanyl (0.15 to 0.7 µg/kg), Rocuronium (0.3 to 0.6 mg/kg), and Sevofluran at low flow. Activated clotting time was kept at >400 s. Mild systemic hypothermia and cold blood cardioplegia were applied. Arterial blood samples were drawn after the induction of anesthesia but before surgical incision and 6 hours after weaning from CPB. Patients were followed until discharge from the hospital.

RNA-Isolation, cDNA Synthesis, and Biotin Labeling
Leukocytes were separated from blood by centrifugation for 25 minutes at 400 x g immediately after collecting the samples. Total RNA extraction from leukocytes was rapidly performed (RNeasy Midi kit, Qiagen), and RNA concentration was adjusted between 500 and 1000 µg/mL, controlled by spectrophotometry (A260/A280 ratio, 1.7:2). RNA quality was controlled with routine acrylamid gel electrophoreses. Ten nanograms of RNA were used for cDNA-synthesis (Superscript II, Invitrogen). cRNA was biotin-labeled by in vitro transcription (BioArray High Yield RNA Transcript Labeling kit, Enzo Biochemicals).

Microarray Hybridization and Signal Analysis
After metal-induced fragmentation by incubation at 94°C for 35 minutes, 15 µg of the biotin-labeled cRNA was mixed with eukaryotic controls and hybridized to the Affymetrix human genome chip U133A (Affymetrix Inc.) for 16 hours at 45°C in a rotating oven (60 rpm). After washing and staining, cRNA was detected with streptavidin phycoerythrin (Molecular Probes) by the Affymetrix Fluidic Station, and analysis was completed using the Affymetrix Scanner. The Affymetrix Microarray Suite (v.5.0) was used to scan and analyze the relative abundance of each gene based on the intensity of the signal from each probe set. Data analyses were managed with the Microarray Data Mining Tool, followed by statistical analyses with JMP (SAS Institute Inc.), SPSS (SPSS Inc.), and Excel (Microsoft). Microarray analyses were performed following the "minimum information about a microarray experiment" guidelines.9

Statistical Analysis of Microarray Data
The present-call filter numerates the amount of correct hybridizations and enables evaluation of the overall microarray performance.10 The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) refers to the multiple testing problem that emerges from repeated testing of the 22 283 genes at a given probability value threshold, indicating the proportionality and reliability of statistical comparison.

Methods A and B focused on the alteration of gene expression within groups. Method A identified significant differences of probe sets using paired t test analyses, stating the preoperative measure as control. Parametric distribution of microarray data was affirmed with the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality. Three different probability value cut-off levels for upregulated and downregulated genes were chosen: 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001. Method B recovered the differentiability of probe sets preoperatively versus postoperatively by their signal intensity fold change (fc). Five different threshold values for upregulated and downregulated genes were computed: 1.2, 1.5, 2, 4, and 6. Only genes exhibiting a differential expression at a significant level (P<0.05) and a fc >4-fold were considered to be differentially expressed within groups.

Methods C and D revealed expression changes between groups. Method C assessed the relative signal intensity values of probe sets by intragroup substraction of preoperative from postoperative signal intensity values. This was followed by an unpaired t test analysis of the relative signal intensity values in group H compared with group P, setting the threshold probability value at 0.05. Method D evaluated the differential expression ({Delta} expression) between groups by intergroup substraction of relative signal intensity values. Only genes exhibiting a significant difference of relative signal intensity values and a {Delta} expression >0.4 were considered to be differentially expressed between groups and were reported.

Micro-array-pathway-profile-finder (MAPPFinder, Gladstone Institute) is a software tool that creates global gene expression profiles by merging microarray data with the annotations of the Gene Ontology project.11,12 It computes a z score for each pathway (Gene Ontology term), which ranks them by their relative amounts of gene expression changes. Positive z scores indicate pathways with a greater number of genes meeting the criteria than expected by chance. MAPPFinder analyses were run within groups on 2 criteria, either an increase (fc >1.2 and P<0.05) or decrease (fc <1/1.2 and P<0.05) in gene expression in leukocytes 6 hours after weaning from CPB, compared with leukocytes collected preoperatively.

Functional Classification of Genes
Genes are reported by their gene name or symbol, locus link accession number, expression ratio, {Delta} expression respectively, and function. Gene function is also based on the evaluation of current reports in Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man and Locus Link.13

Microarray Validation with Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Expression profiles of PXN, LEF1, MATN3, and NR1/2 yielded by microarrays were validated with real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in circulating leukocytes of both patient groups before surgery and 6 hours after CPB. GAPDH was established as housekeeping gene, and the following primers were used: PXN forward 5'-GAGCTGATGGCTTCGCTGTC-3' and reverse 5'-ATGAACCCTCCCTCGTCCTG-3', LEF1 forward 5'-CTCTTGGCTGGCAAGGTCAG-3' and reverse 5'-CAGTTGTGTGGGGACCAGGA-3', MATN3 forward 5'-TGAGCCCCTAGAGGAGCATG-3' and reverse 5'-GGCACTGGTGTGTTCCAAGC-3', NR1/2 forward 5'-CCCATCGAGGGAAGAAGCTG-3' and reverse 5'-GGCTGGGGGTTTGTAGTTCC-3', and GAPDH forward 5'-TCAACAGCGACACCCACTCC-3' and reverse 5'-TGAGGTCCACCACCCTGTTG-3'. Amplification conditions and additional analyses were performed as described previously.14


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusion
down arrowReferences
 
Clinical Outcome
There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding demographic and perioperative data (Table 1). All of the patients had uneventful surgery and recovery (no reoperations and no deaths).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Patient Characteristics

Present-Call Filter and SNR
Among our {approx}8.5 million oligonucleotide dataset, we found a consistent percentage of present calls in group H [12 arrays, 39.1±3.2% (mean ± SD)] and group P (12 arrays, 39.4%± 2.8%). The SNR was 4.23 at P<0.05, 8.97 at P<0.01, and 10.7 at P<0.001 in group H, whereas the SNR was 2.05 at P<0.05, 1.47 at P<0.01, and 0.65 at P<0.001 in group P.

Alteration of Single Genes
The number of differentially expressed genes was consistently greater in group H compared with group P, irrespective of listing genes by their probability value (P<0.001) (Figures 1 and 2 Down) or fc (P<0.05) (Figure 3 and 4Down). According to methods A and B, 50 genes were found to be upregulated in group H compared with 7 in group P, whereas 27 genes were downregulated in group H compared with 7 in group P. The overall greatest expression changes were observed for CRISP3, PRV1 (both 18-fold upregulation), and MAP4K1 (22-fold downregulation) in group H and for CD163 (4-fold upregulation) and, again, MAP4K1 (6-fold downregulation) in group P. Numerous genes encoding proteins crucial for innate immune response and inflammation (FCAR, JAK3, CD163, MAP4K1, CR1, and TNFRSF 12), apoptosis and cell cycle arrest (GADD45A, CHEK2, and S100A8), and angiogenesis (HGF and CEACAM1) revealed the greatest expression changes in group H.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Number of upregulated genes of 22 283 according to method A, listed by their probability value postoperatively vs preoperatively (log scale). Horizontal lines indicate significant differences between groups.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Number of downregulated genes of 22 283 (log scale). Refer to Figure 1 for characteristics.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Number or upregulated genes of 22 283 according to method B, listed by their fc postoperatively versus preoperatively (log scale). Horizontal lines indicate significant differences between groups.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Number of downregulated genes of 22 283 (log scale). Refer to Figure 3 for characteristics.

According to methods C and D, 18 genes presented the greatest differential expression depending on circuit coating. Twelve of these were predominantly expressed in group H, encoding for proteins involved in extracellular signal transduction (MAPK12), cell-cell interaction (CDH6), and neutrophil chemotaxis (MCP2). Six genes were mainly expressed in group P, functioning in nuclear factor {kappa}B activation (MINK), oxidative stress (TP53I11), and the regulation of cytochrome P450 (NR1/2) (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Highly Altered Genes in Leukocytes Postoperatively Versus Preoperatively of Patients Undergoing CABG With Heparin-Coated Circuits Compared With Patients Undergoing CABG With Protein-Coated Circuits

Alteration of Gene Pathways
MAPPFinder calculations determined 1405 upregulated and 1454 downregulated pathways in group H compared with 552 upregulated and 818 downregulated pathways in group P (P<0.01) (Figure 5). The pathways small GTPase-mediated signal transduction (z=5.8, upregulated) and cytosolic ribosome (z=17.1, downregulated) showed the overall highest z score in group H and alike interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (z=8.56, upregulated) and integrase (z=5.11, downregulated) in group P. Concordant upregulation was detected for pathways involved in inflammatory processes and response to stress in group H, whereas pathways regulating protein biosynthesis and ribosomes were downregulated. Pathway analysis in group P did not exhibit coherent expression changes to a comparable extent.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Number of pathways exhibiting positive z scores preoperatively vs postoperatively in leukocyte expression of patients undergoing CABG with either heparin-coated or protein-coated circuits, indicating greater gene expression changes than expected by chance.

Validation
Similar expression was observed for LEF1, NR1/2, MATN3, and PXN with microarray analysis and RT-PCR in 15 of 16 features. Expression of LEF1 detected with microarrays (group H: 2.3-fold decrease, P<0.05; group P: 2-fold decrease, P<0.05) was concordant with RT-PCR (H: 2.9-fold decrease; P: 1.3-fold decrease). Analysis of NR1/2 with microarrays (H: 2.4-fold increase, P<0.05; P: 1.4-fold decrease, P<0.05) was alike in RT-PCR (H: 5.3-fold increase, P<0.05; P: 3-fold decrease, P<0.01). MATN3 expression yielded with microarrays (H: 1.2-fold decrease; P: 4.6-fold increase, P<0.05) was similar to RT-PCR (H: 2.2-fold decrease; P: 1.4-fold increase). Microarray analysis of PXN (H: 1.5-fold increase, P<0.01; P: 1.2-fold increase) showed a discrepancy to RT-PCR in 1 feature (H: 10-fold decrease; P: 1.5-fold increase).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowConclusion
down arrowReferences
 
Our data demonstrate for the first time that gene expression in circulating leukocytes of patients undergoing on-pump CABG is directly dependent on circuit coating. Expression changes of numerous genes involved in inflammatory reactions with subsequent pathway activation were detected. A large number of genes previously not described in the context of CPB were identified.

Leukocytes are of special interest because of their crucial function in the pathogenesis of inflammation and CPB-associated inflammatory reactions.15 Microarray analyses were feasible and validated with RT-PCR. Although no standard procedure for the analysis of microarray data exists,16 we believe that highly suitable statistical analyses were performed.

It is remarkable that only the 2 genes CD163 and MAP4K1 were shared by both groups. The CD163-encoded protein is an acute-phase regulated macrophage protein functioning as a hemoglobin-haptoglobin scavenger receptor and has been proposed as a target for potential manipulation of the acute response to CPB-associated inflammation.17 MAP4K1 functions as an upstream activator of proinflammatory and proapoptotic pathways (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase, c-jun-amino-terminal kinase, and stress-activated protein kinase) in response to stress.18 CD163 and MAP4K1 were expressed irrespective of circuit coatings, suggesting them as markers of proinflammatory and proapoptotic cellular activation, as yet described in other tissues for c-fos, c-jun, EGR-1,19–21 interleukin 6,1,14 tumor necrosis factor {alpha}, and interleukin 8.14

The observed changes in leukocyte gene expression correlate to similar findings in the cardiomyocytes of atrial samples after CPB.21,22 The significant increase of MCP2 in leukocytes and of MCP1 in cardiomyocytes21 after CPB points at induction of inflammation and cellular damage. In contrast, ischemic preconditioned leukocytes showed a decrease of the corresponding chemokine receptor, suggesting a reduction in cellular injury.23 Thus, the reported increase of MCP1 and 2 may suggest that ischemia or hypoxia are not primarily involved in CPB-induced cellular impairment. The decrease of TNFRSF 12 in leukocytes and of TNFRSF7 in cardiomyocytes21 might support the suggestion that these cytokines do not contribute to CPB-associated inflammatory reaction. The CEACAM1-encoded protein binds to endothelial E-selectin and has been reported to stimulate proliferation, chemotaxis, and angiogenesis.13 It was upregulated in leukocytes but downregulated in cardiomyocytes.21 The increased expression of CDH6, which has similarities to CEACAM1, may indicate pronounced leukocyte activation, as demonstrated previously during inflammation after CPB.5 This holds also true for the increased expression of S100A8 in leukocytes and of S100A4 in cardiomyocytes,21 genes that have been reported in correlation to cerebral damage after CPB.13 Numerous mitogen-activated protein kinase genes were differentially expressed in leukocytes and cardiomyocytes after CPB21 and ischemic preconditioned leukocytes.23 These genes are involved in the regulation of a large variety of proteins and mechanisms13 and are pivotal in cellular response to stress. In addition, the induction of apoptosis in endothelial cells reported previously by our group24 corresponds with the present findings of GADD45A, MAP4K1, and CHEK2 upregulation.

Our data demonstrate that heparin coating creates much more genomic disturbances in leukocytes than protein coating. This is a novel and somewhat unexpected observation, because heparin coating is thought to imitate physiological conditions of the vessel wall, thereby ameliorating CPB-associated inflammatory reactions.6 Protein coating possibly inhibits genomic alteration and ameliorates CPB-induced inflammatory reactions. However, we did not find any significant differences in the clinical outcome of patients, similar to previous studies.7 This may be attributable to small patient numbers. Furthermore, we do not know to what extent the observed changes in gene expression translate into protein synthesis and function. Future studies will have to clarify these points.


*    Conclusion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*Conclusion
down arrowReferences
 
Leukocytes undergo a profound alteration of gene expression after CPB dependent on circuit coating. Inflammatory reactions after CPB are observable on gene expression level, whereas microarray analysis serves as a highly suitable tool.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was in part supported by grant WE2082/2-1 of the German Research Foundation.


*    Footnotes
 
Presented at the 77th Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association, New Orleans, LA, November 7–10, 2004.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
up arrowConclusion
*References
 

  1. Cremer J, Martin M, Redl H, Bahrami S, Abraham C, Graeter T, Haverich A, Schlag G, Borst HG. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996; 61: 1714–1720.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Paparella D, Yau TM, Young E. Cardiopulmonary bypass induced inflammation: pathophysiology and treatment. An update. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002; 21: 232–244.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Friedman M, Wang SY, Stahl GL, Johnson RG, Sellke FW. Altered beta-adrenergic and cholinergic pulmonary vascular responses after total cardiopulmonary bypass. J Appl Physiol. 1995; 79: 1998–2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Sellke FW, Tofukuji M, Stamler A, Li J, Wang SY. Beta-adrenergic regulation of the cerebral microcirculation after hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. Circulation. 1997; 96: II304–II310.
  5. Edmunds LH Jr. Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998; 66: 12–16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Harig F, Feyrer R, Mahmoud FO, Blum U, von der Emde J. Reducing the post-pump syndrome by using heparin-coated circuits, steroids, or aprotinin. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999; 47: 111–118.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Wendel HP, Ziemer G. Coating-techniques to improve the hemocompatibility of artificial devices used for extracorporeal circulation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999; 16: 342–350.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Duggan DJ, Bittner M, Chen Y, Meltzer P, Trent JM. Expression profiling using cDNA microarrays. Nat Genet. 1999; 21: 10–14.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Brazma A, Hingamp P, Quackenbush J, Sherlock G, Spellman P, Stoeckert C, Aach J, Ansorge W, Ball CA, Causton HC, Gaasterland T, Glenisson P, Holstege FC, Kim IF, Markowitz V, Matese JC, Parkinson H, Robinson A, Sarkans U, Schulze-Kremer S, Stewart J, Taylor R, Vilo J, Vingron M. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME): toward standards for microarray data. Nat Genet. 2001; 29: 365–371.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Bakay M, Chen YW, Borup R, Zhao P, Nagaraju K, Hoffman EP. Sources of variability and effect of experimental approach on expression profiling data interpretation. BMC Bioinformatics. 2002; 3: 4.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Creating the Gene Ontology resource: design and implementation. Genome Res. 2001; 11: 1425–1433.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Doniger SW, Salomonis N, Dahlquist KD, Vranizan K, Lawlor SC, Conklin BR. MAPPFinder: using Gene Ontology and GenMAPP to create a global gene-expression profile from microarray data. Genome Biol. 2003; 4: R7.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez.
  14. Zimmermann AK, Simon P, Seeburger J, Hoffmann J, Ziemer G, Aebert H, Wendel HP. Cytokine gene expression in monocytes of patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery evaluated by real-time PCR. J Cell Mol Med. 2003; 7: 146–156.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Hayashi Y, Sawa Y, Fukuyama N, Miyamoto Y, Takahashi T, Nakazawa H, Matsuda H. Leukocyte-depleted terminal blood cardioplegia provides superior myocardial protective effects in association with myocardium-derived nitric oxide and peroxynitrite production for patients undergoing prolonged aortic crossclamping for more than 120 minutes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003; 126: 1813–1821.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. King HC, Sinha AA. Gene expression profile analysis by DNA microarrays: promise and pitfalls. JAMA. 2001; 286: 2280–2288.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Goldstein JL, Goldstein KA, Wardwell K, Fahrner SL, Goonan KE, Cheney MD, Yeager MP, Guyre PM. Increase in plasma and surface CD163 levels in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Atherosclerosis. 2003; 170: 325–332.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Zanke BW, Boudreau K, Rubie E, Winnett E, Tibbles LA, Zon L, Kyriakis J, Liu FF, Woodgett JR. The stress-activated protein kinase pathway mediates cell death following injury induced by cis-platinum, UV irradiation or heat. Curr Biol. 1996; 6: 606–613.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Nelson DP, Wechsler SB, Miura T, Stagg A, Newburger JW, Mayer JE Jr., Neufeld EJ. Myocardial immediate early gene activation after cardiopulmonary bypass with cardiac ischemia-reperfusion. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002; 73: 156–162.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Aebert H, Cornelius T, Ehr T, Holmer SR, Birnbaum DE, Riegger GA, Schunkert H. Expression of immediate early genes after cardioplegic arrest and reperfusion. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997; 63: 1669–1675.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Ruel M, Bianchi C, Khan TA, Xu S, Liddicoat JR, Voisine P, Araujo E, Lyon H, Kohane IS, Libermann TA, Sellke FW. Gene expression profile after cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003; 126: 1521–1530.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Voisine P, Ruel M, Khan TA, Bianchi C, Xu SH, Kohane I, Libermann TA, Out H, Saltiel AR, Sellke FW. Differences in gene expression profiles of diabetic and nondiabetic patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest. Circulation. 2004; 110: II280–II286.
  23. Konstantinov IE, Arab S, Kharbanda RK, Li J, Cheung MMH, Cherepanov V, Downey GP, Liu PP, Cukerman E, Coles JG, Redington AN. The remote ischemic preconditioning stimulus modifies inflammatory gene expression in humans. Physiol Genomics. 2004; 19: 143–150.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Aebert H, Kirchner S, Keyser A, Birnbaum DE, Holler E, Andreesen R, Eissner G. Endothelial apoptosis is induced by serum of patients after cardiopulmonary bypass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000; 18: 589–593.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seeburger, J.
Right arrow Articles by Aebert, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seeburger, J.
Right arrow Articles by Aebert, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow CV surgery: other