Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2005;112:1353-1361
Published online before print August 22, 2005, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.519025
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
112/9/1353    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.104.519025v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, S.
Right arrow Articles by Dong, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, S.
Right arrow Articles by Dong, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Gene expression
Right arrow Gene regulation
Right arrow Ion channels/membrane transport
Right arrow Smooth muscle proliferation and differentiation
Right arrow Mechanism of atherosclerosis/growth factors

(Circulation. 2005;112:1353-1361.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Vascular Medicine

Inactivation of Monocarboxylate Transporter MCT3 by DNA Methylation in Atherosclerosis

Shoukang Zhu, MD, MSc; Pascal J. Goldschmidt-Clermont, MD; Chunming Dong, MD

From the Department of Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.

Correspondence to Chunming Dong, MD, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3845, Durham, NC 27710. E-mail dong0005{at}mc.duke.edu

Received November 5, 2004; revision received May 16, 2005; accepted May 18, 2005.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs) mediate lactate transport across the plasma membrane of cells. The molecular mechanisms regulating monocarboxylate transport in smooth muscle cells (SMCs) remain poorly characterized. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of DNA methylation on MCT expression and lactate transport in SMCs in relation to atherosclerosis.

Methods and Results— MCT expression was determined by real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction, Western blotting, and immunohistochemistry in SMCs isolated from human aortas and coronary arteries. Bisulfite sequencing and confocal microscopic analysis were used to study DNA methylation and lactate transport in SMCs, respectively. Downregulation of MCT3 and impaired lactate transport were detected in proliferating/synthetic SMCs, relative to the contractile phenotype. A passage number– and atherosclerotic lesion–dependent methylation pattern of MCT3 was demonstrated in the CpG island located in exon 2. Treatment of SMCs with the demethylating agent 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine restored MCT3 expression and normalized lactate transport. Furthermore, small interfering RNA–mediated specific MCT3 knockdown substantially stimulated SMC proliferation.

Conclusions— These data indicate that DNA methylation may modify monocarboxylate transport by suppressing MCT3 expression, which could be important in regulating SMC function and the development of atherosclerosis.


Key Words: atherosclerosis • cardiovascular diseases • ion channels • molecule biology • muscle, smooth


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Atherosclerosis is a complex disease characterized by the accumulation of lipids, fibrous materials, cell debris, and minerals in the arteries.1 Much attention has been focused on characterizing the influence of traditional risk factors, such as lipids, homocysteine, glucose, and recently, cytokines and inflammatory markers, on vascular cells and atherosclerotic lesion development.2 Little effort, however, has been made to elucidate the effects of monocarboxylates, including lactate, pyruvate, and ketone bodies, and their transport in atherogenesis. Indeed glucose, the preferred energy source in vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs), is metabolized through aerobic glycolysis, resulting in the production of quantities of lactate, which must be transported from the cell to prevent intracellular acidification. Furthermore, lactate is also utilized by muscle cells as fuel and must be transported into these cells.3 Hence, transport of lactate and probably other monocarboxylates represents an important metabolic process in vascular cells, in particular SMCs, and inadequate monocarboxylate transport may affect the development of atherosclerotic lesions.

Transport of lactate, pyruvate, and ketone bodies across the plasma membrane is mediated via a family of proton-coupled monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs). Nine members of this family have been cloned in humans. To date, only isoforms MCT1 through 4 have been shown to transport lactate.4 MCT3, originally cloned from a chicken retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) expression library, is an important member of the MCT family.5,6 MCT isoform expression and monocarboxylate transport in human SMCs remain to be characterized.

DNA methylation refers to the addition of a methyl group to the 5 position of cytosine in the context of a CpG dinucleotide. Although controversy still exists about the impact of the position and size of the methylated DNA segments on regional transcription, it has been well established that this epigenetic change influences gene expression.7 Specifically, DNA methylation is associated with transcription silencing, and loss of methylation (demethylation) activates gene expression. Increasing evidence indicates that human diseases, including cancer and atherosclerosis, are either caused or impacted by abnormal methylation.8,9

In the present study, we investigated MCT3 methylation and expression in cultured SMCs, coronary arteries, and aortas with varying atherosclerotic burden. We show that methylation of a CpG island located in exon 2 of the MCT3 gene suppresses its transcription, a phenomenon associated with increased passage number of cultured SMCs and with advanced atherosclerotic lesions. MCT3 methylation was associated with impaired lactate transport in SMCs. Importantly, treatment of SMCs with the demethylating agent 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC) restored MCT3 expression and normalized lactate transport. Furthermore, small interfering RNA (siRNA)–mediated specific MCT3 knockdown substantially stimulated SMC proliferation. These data, for the first time, indicate the effect of DNA methylation of the MCT3 gene in the dysregulation of monocarboxylate transport and SMC proliferation in the context of atherosclerosis.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Tissue Collection and Processing
Aortas of heart donors were collected at the time of organ harvest and stored in University of Wisconsin solution on ice to minimize postmortem changes. For this study, 10 normal aortas were used for isolating SMCs, and 23 aortas and 12 coronary arteries were used for MCT3 expression and/or methylation study. The studies were approved by the institutional review board of the Duke University Medical Center. Detailed tissue processing protocols are presented in the online-only Data Supplement.

Cell Culture
Primary human aortic SMCs were obtained from the tunica media of 10 normal thoracic aortas after surgically dissecting away the adventitia, as described.10 Detailed protocols are presented in the online-only Data Supplement.

TaqMan Real-Time Reverse Transcription–Polymerase Chain Reaction (TRT-PCR)
RNA was isolated from cultured cells and frozen aortas with the use of an RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen). One microgram of total RNA was used for synthesis of first-strand cDNA with the Superscript preamplification system (Life Technologies). Detailed TRT-PCR protocols are provided in the online-only Data Supplement.

Immunoblotting Analysis
Cell extracts were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under nonreducing conditions. Proteins on the gel were then transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Immunoblotting was performed with rabbit anti-MCT1, 2, 3, and 4 antibodies, followed by incubation with goat anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase–conjugated secondary antibody (Zymed), and detection by chemiluminescence.

Immunohistochemistry
Cardiac specimens were processed by 10% formalin fixation and paraffin embedding. Immunohistochemistry for MCT3 (Chemicon International) and SM {alpha}-actin (Dako) was performed according to protocols provided in the online-only Data Supplement.

Bisulfite Sequencing
Genomic DNA was isolated from the tunica media, cultured SMCs, and aortas with the use of a GIBCO DNAzol isolation kit, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Two micrograms of genomic DNA from each sample was treated with sodium bisulfite in the CpGenome DNA modification kit (Oncor Inc), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Detailed protocols and primer sequences for PCR amplification after bisulfite treatment are presented in the online-only Data Supplement.

RNA Interference
Small interfering RNA (siRNA) target-finder software (Ambion) was used to design 4 siRNA sequences for inhibition of human MCT3. Control siRNA consisted of nonspecific, siRNA duplexes containing the same nucleotides but in a scrambled format. siRNAs were synthesized by a transcription-based method in the Ambion Silencer siRNA construction kit, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. siRNA oligonucleotide template sequences and detailed siRNA transfection protocols are provided in the online-only Data Supplement.

Confocal Measurement of pHi
The pHi measurement was performed with a Fluoview FV 500 laser scanning confocal biological microscope. Detailed protocols are presented in the online-only Data Supplement.

Cell Proliferation Assay
For proliferation assays, passage 2 SMCs were plated at 5x104 cells/well into 24-well plates under normal cell culture conditions overnight. Detailed growth conditions are described in the online-only Data Supplement. Cells were then transfected with 25 or 50 nmol/L MCT3 siRNA and scrambled siRNA control as described earlier. Untransfected cells served as additional controls. Cells were collected and counted at 48 and 96 hours. Dead cells were excluded by trypan blue staining. Mean and SEM for 3 replicates were calculated.

Statistical Methods
Group means were compared with either Student t test or ANOVA with a Fisher post hoc test, as appropriate. Data are presented as mean±SEM with P<0.05 accepted as significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
MCT3 Expression in Cultured SMCs and Normal and Atherosclerotic Vessels
In an attempt to understand the regulation of lactate transport and pHi in SMCs in the vessel wall, we first examined the expression of MCT1 through MCT4, which are known to mediate monocarboxylate transport, in these cells. We established primary SMC strains isolated from 10 normal aortas collected from cardiac transplant donors. For each SMC strain, the in situ tunica media (passage 0) and cells at passage 3, 5, and 8 were used to examine the impact of SMC dedifferentiation on MCT expression by TRT-PCR. Abundant MCT3 mRNA was detected in all tunica media (passage 0 SMCs) samples. The level of MCT3 expression decreased in a passage number–dependent manner between passages 3 and 5. At passage 8, only trace expression of MCT3 mRNA was detectable (Figure 1A). By comparison, the low, constitutive expression of MCT1, 2, and 4 mRNAs (Figure 1B–D) and the 2 housekeeping genes, 18S rRNA and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (data not shown), did not show any detectable changes with culture. Western blotting analysis (Figure 1E), with a specific anti-MCT3 antibody, demonstrated MCT3 protein expression in SMCs at passages 0 and 3 (cells that expressed the mRNA), but no expression could be detected at passages 5 and 8 (where only a trace amount of mRNA was detected), thereby providing validation for the results of TRT-PCR. In contrast, MCT1, 2, and 4 proteins were consistently expressed at relatively low levels in SMCs regardless of cell culture status (Figure 1F–1H). These data indicate that downregulation of MCT3 is associated with the SMC phenotypic switch from contractile to proliferating/synthetic. The lack of a compensatory increase in the expression levels of MCT1, 2, and 4 renders MCT3 a probable rate-limiting factor for the putatively compromised monocarboxylate transport in proliferating SMCs residing in atherosclerotic plaques in vivo. Hence, in the following experiments, we focused our investigation on MCT3.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Passage number (P)–dependent decrease in MCT3 expression in SMCs. MCT3 mRNA expression is abundant in the tunica media (P0) but decreases in a passage number–dependent manner, as detected by TRT-PCR (A). The constitutively low levels of MCT1, 2, and 4 mRNAs do not show detectable changes with culture (B–D). Western blot shows a passage-dependent decrease in MCT3 protein expression (E). No obvious alterations in the expression of MCT1, 2, and 4 proteins (F–H) are observed in SMCs at different passages and in normal aortas (A1 and A2). *P<0.05, **P<0.01.

To investigate whether downregulation of MCT3 also occurred in vivo in the context of atherosclerosis, we examined MCT3 mRNA and protein expression by TRT-PCR and Western blotting in 23 aortas showing varying degrees of atherosclerosis collected from cardiac transplant donors. Atherosclerosis burden was evaluated by en face Sudan IV staining and analysis of raised plaques, as described in the PDAY study,11 and was classified as normal, mild, moderate, or severe. Remarkably, a graded decrease in MCT3 mRNA and protein expression was observed relative to the increased severity of atherosclerosis in these vessels (Figure 2). Considering that the switch of SMCs from the contractile to the proliferating/synthetic phenotype and loss of the tunica media are key events in atherogenesis, these data are highly consistent with our in vitro observations.



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. MCT3 expression is decreased in aortas with atherosclerosis in a lesion-dependent manner. MCT3 mRNA (A) and protein (B) are decreased in 18 aortas with mild (7), moderate (5), and severe (6) atherosclerosis relative to 5 normal vessels. The expression levels are inversely correlated with the degree of atherosclerosis burden. *P<0.05, **P<0.01.

To further determine whether the lack of MCT3 expression was correlated with SMC dedifferentiation and medial thinning associated with atherosclerosis, we performed immunohistochemistry with MCT3 antibody in autopsied myocardial tissues from coronary arteries collected from 12 patients who had died of ischemic heart disease. MCT3 expression was detected in both the myocardium and coronary vessels. In coronary arteries, MCT3 expression was restricted to the tunica media, and colocalization of MCT3 and SM {alpha}-actin was demonstrated. In the neointima, where >60% of cells were proliferating/synthetic SMCs as indicated by SM {alpha}-actin staining, MCT3 was almost undetectable (Figure 3). Remarkably, the majority of MCT3-negative cells colocalized with SM {alpha}-actin–positive cells in the neointima. These data indicate that the decreased MCT3 expression in atherosclerosis may be, at least in part, due to loss of the tunica media and SMC dedifferentiation in the disease process.



View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Decreased MCT3 expression in the vessel wall is associated with SMC dedifferentiation in atherosclerosis. MCT3 expression is exclusively detected in the tunica media of coronary arteries, but not in the neointima (A, C). SM {alpha}-actin expression is present in both the tunica media and neointima (B, D), indicating that a majority of cells located in the neointima are dedifferentiated SMCs. Colocalization of MCT3-negative and SM {alpha}-actin–positive cells is noted. Magnification, A and B, x110; C and D, x330. M indicates media; I, intima; arrows, internal elastic lamina.

Methylation Status of MCT-3 in Cultured SMCs and Normal and Atherosclerotic Aortas
To investigate whether DNA methylation might contribute to the decreased expression of MCT3 in cultured SMCs and in atherosclerotic aortas, we first analyzed the structure of the MCT3 gene, in particular, the number and distribution of scattered CpG sites and CpG islands with use of an online program, cpgplot, available at http://www.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk, which defines a CpG island as a 200-bp region with a calculated CG composition >50% and an observed to expected CpG ratio of >0.6. This analysis revealed that although the 2303-bp MCT3 promoter did not contain CpG islands, there were 59 discrete CpG sites scattered in the promoter region. Furthermore, 2 CpG islands, from –10 to +272 (282 bp with 31 CpG sites) and from +1192 to +2053 (862 bp with 105 CpG sites), were located in exon 2 and exon 4, respectively, of the coding region of the MCT3 gene.

To determine the correlation between DNA methylation and expression of MCT3, we chose to examine the methylation status of differentiated SMCs (passage 0) and cultured SMCs at passage 8, extremes of SMCs in terms of MCT3 expression, by genomic bisulfite sequencing, a technique capable of detailed mapping of methylated residues of a specific gene. Although most previous investigations have focused on CpG island methylation in the promoter region, which has been causally associated with transcription silencing, methylation of scattered CpG sites, however, may also affect transcription. This is particularly true if these CpG sites are located in the binding sites for DNA binding proteins, which may prevent efficient protein-DNA interactions and subsequent transcription initiation.

To survey the methylation profiles of the promoter region, we first designed 3 pairs of primers from –1238 to –270 bp, where 27 of the 59 CpG sites are located, to amplify the modified DNAs. The PCR products were ligated, transformed, and further amplified with the pCR 4-TOPO vector and DH5{alpha} cells. Five to 8 clones for each cell strain were used for sequencing. Percent methylation of CpG sites for this promoter region in a given cell strain was calculated on the basis of sequencing data derived from all clones. Surprisingly, all 27 CpG sites were uniformly methylated in all clones for each cell strain, and all cell strains exhibited the same methylation pattern regardless of expression status of MCT3 and culture status of the cells used (data not shown). We also examined the methylation status of the MCT3 promoter in human RPE, the only cells that are known to express a high level of MCT3. With use of the same primers, uniform methylation of all 27 CpG sites was similarly detected in the MCT3 promoter in RPE cells. The remaining 32 CpG sites are distributed at widely spaced intervals in the MCT3 promoter, hindering efficient methylation analysis. Nevertheless, the data obtained from these 27 CpG sites surveyed suggest that methylation of discrete CpG sites in the promoter region of MCT3 does not appear to suppress its transcription and cannot be used to explain the observed transcriptional silencing in cultured SMCs relative to differentiated SMCs. The data also rule out the possibility that a cell type–specific MCT3 promoter, distinct from that of RPE, may be operative in SMCs.

Recent evidence indicates that DNA methylation of the coding region is more powerful in suppressing gene expression than the promoter region.12,13 Although controversial, this represents a significant progress in our understanding of the effects of DNA methylation. To investigate DNA methylation of CpG islands in the coding region of MCT3, 2 pairs of primers covering the CpG island in exon 2 and 3 primer pairs specifying the CpG island in exon 4 were used, and genomic bisulfite sequencing of the amplified products was performed. The percentage of CpGs located in each CpG island in a given cell strain was calculated on the basis of sequencing data derived from 5 to 8 PCR product clones. In SMCs at passage 8, complete methylation of CpG dinucleotides in 81±9% of the clones for the CpG island located in exon 2 was demonstrated in 7 of the 10 cell strains where MCT3 expression was absent. The remaining 3 SMC strains showed partial methylation (65±6%) of CpG dinucleotides in 76±4% of the clones analyzed (Figure 4). In contrast, in 6 of the 10 normal tunica media (SMCs at passage 0), where MCT3 expression was abundant, no DNA methylation was detected in 73±12% of the clones for each sample. The remaining 4 had partial DNA methylation (25±9%) of CpG dinucleotides in 30±7% of the clones for each cell strain (Figure 4). Bisulfite sequencing analysis of the CpG island located in exon 4 revealed a low, basal level of random methylation (<5% of the CpG dinucleotides in <20% of the clones) in both cultured SMC strains and differentiated SM medial layer isolated from a normal aortic wall. The level of methylation did not differ between these SMC phenotypes (data not shown). Furthermore, DNA methylation was undetectable in exons 2 and 4 of the MCT3 gene in RPE cells (data not shown). Collectively, these results indicate that silencing of MCT3 expression associated with the SMC phenotypic switch is correlated with a specific pattern of methylation of the CpG island located in exon 2 of the gene.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. MCT3 methylation in SMCs. DNA was extracted from the tunica media (P0), and the same SMCs were cultured to passage 8 obtained from 10 normal aortas. Bisulfite sequencing for the CpG island located in exon 2 of the MCT3 gene was performed on 5 to 8 clones for each of the 10 SMC strains. The percentages of methylated CpG dinucleotides, affected clones, and involved SMC strains were calculated. The data show markedly increased DNA methylation status in SMCs at passage 8 relative to passage 0. **P<0.01.

Because the aforementioned data suggested a role for DNA methylation of exon 2 in silencing MCT3 expression in cultured SMCs, cells resembling the proliferating/synthetic SMC phenotype in the neointima, we expected that such epigenetic changes might also take place in vivo. Indeed, genomic bisulfite sequencing results of the exon 2 CpG island obtained from the 23 aortas used for analysis of MCT3 expression showed methylation of 7±3% of CpGs in 5±2% of clones for 5 of 5 MCT3-expressing normal tissues (Figure 5), whereas a graded increase in methylation was observed in 16 of 18 atherosclerotic aortas with varying disease burden (15±7% of CpGs in 20±9% of clones for mild, 36±8% of CpGs in 41±10% of clones for moderate, and 72+7% of CpGs in 81+6% of clones for severe atherosclerosis; Figure 5). Furthermore, the extent of methylation, in terms of percentage of both CpGs and clones, was inversely correlated with the level of MCT3 expression (r=–0.88, P=0.002, and r=–0.74, P=0.03, respectively). These results support the notion that DNA methylation may play a major role in controlling MCT3 expression in vivo. The absence of DNA methylation in 2 atherosclerotic aortas (1 with moderate and the other with severe atherosclerosis) suggests that there are other factors besides DNA methylation that repress MCT3 expression in atherosclerosis, reflecting its multifactorial and complex pathogenesis/etiology.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. MCT3 methylation in aortas with different degrees of atherosclerosis. DNA was extracted from the normal aortic wall and from 18 aortas with mild (7), moderate (5), and severe (6) atherosclerosis. The extent of MCT3 methylation was examined by bisulfite sequencing for the CpG island located in exon 2 of the MCT3 gene in 5 to 8 clones for each sample. The percentages of methylated CpG dinucleotides, affected clones, and involved aortas were calculated. The data show a lesion-dependent increase in DNA methylation pattern. **P<0.01.

Reactivation of MCT3 Expression by 5-aza-dC
If transcriptional silencing of MCT3 were indeed attributed to DNA methylation, in particular, the CpG island located in exon 2, then demethylating the gene with 5-aza-dC would restore MCT3 expression in cultured SMCs. To test this hypothesis, we selected 4 SMC strains at passage 8 that showed complete exon 2 CpG island methylation in >90% of the clones and a lack of MCT3 expression by both TRT-PCR and Western blotting. Cells were treated with different concentrations (1 µmol/L and 5 µmol/L) of 5-aza-dC for 4 days, and the medium containing 5-aza-dC was replaced daily. As shown in Figure 6A and 6B, in all SMC strains, MCT3 mRNA and protein expression were induced by 5-aza-dC in a dose-dependent manner, whereas no induction of MCT1, 2, and 4 mRNA expression was detected (data not shown). To confirm that reactivation of MCT3 expression by 5-aza-dC was mediated by DNA demethylation in exon 2, genomic DNA was isolated from 3 of 4 SMC strains before and after 5 µmol/L 5-aza-dC exposure and subjected to bisulfite sequencing. As expected, all CpG dinucleotides in the exon 2 CpG island in these SMCs became demethylated (Figure 6C). Furthermore, 5-aza-dC treatment of the tunica media and RPE did not further increase the level of MCT3 mRNA expression (data not shown). Taken together, these data demonstrate that reactivation of MCT3 expression by 5-aza-C may be a direct effect of demethylation, further supporting the causative effect of DNA methylation in MCT3 repression in dedifferentiated SMCs. The lack of a further increase in MCT3 expression in response to 5-aza-C in differentiated SMCs and RPE indicates that methylation of scattered CpGs in the promoter region of these cells makes little, if any, contributions to suppression of the gene.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Reactivation of MCT3 expression by 5-aza-dC. Incubation of SMCs at passage 8 with 1 or 5 µmol/L 5-aza-dC dose-dependently restored MCT3 mRNA expression, as detected by TRT-PCR (A). Reactivation of MCT3 expression at the protein level is also detected by Western blot in 4 SMC strains at passage 8 (B). Bisulfite sequencing reveals nearly complete demethylation of the MCT3 gene in SMCs at passage 8 (C). **P<0.01.

Impaired Lactate Transport and Enhanced Proliferation in Cultured SMCs
To determine whether MCT3 silencing, probably controlled by DNA methylation, resulted in impaired lactate transport, we determined intracellular acidification induced by extracellular application of lactate with carboxyseminapthorodofluor-1 (carboxy-SNARF-1) as an indicator for pHi, and used confocal microscopic analysis in 5 primary SMC strains incubated in the presence or absence of lactate. SNARF staining of SMCs at passages 1 and 8 incubated in serum-free Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium in the absence of lactate for 2 hours revealed essentially the same basal level of pHi (Figure 7A–7D). After a 2-hour incubation with 25 or 50 mmol/L lactate, SMCs at passage 1 exhibited a marked and significant decrease in pHi, whereas SMCs at passage 8 did not show detectable changes (Figure 7E–7H). To confirm that the observed acidification reflected the entry of lactate and H+ via MCTs, we pretreated the cells with phloretin, an inhibitor of MCTs. Phloretin treatment abolished the pHi decrease in SMCs at passage 1 but elicited little if any change in SMCs at passage 8 (Figure 7I–7L). Because phloretin also inhibits glucose transport mediated by sodium-independent glucose transporter-1 and -4 and therefore might affect lactate transport, we repeated the aforementioned experiments with siRNA-mediated MCT3 gene silencing. Selective MCT3 knockdown similarly eliminated the pHi decrease in SMCs at passage 1, but not passage 8, whereas scrambled siRNA controls had no effect (data not shown).



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Impaired lactate transport in proliferating SMCs. Lactate transport was determined by confocal microscopic analysis of emission images collected at wavelengths of 560 nm (pH1) and 610 nm (pH2). The pH1-pH2 ratio was used to calculate the pHi value. In the absence of lactate, a similar pH1-pH2 ratio was observed in cultured SMCs at passages 1 and 8 (A–D). In the presence of lactate, SMCs at passage 1 show a marked increase in their pH1-pH2 ratio, indicative of decreased pHi due to lactate transport into the cell (E, F), an effect not observed in SMCs at passage 8, perhaps because of MCT3 methylation–induced deficient lactate transport (G, H). MCT inhibitor phloretin treatment abolished the lactate-mediated pHi decrease in SMCs at passage 1 (I, J) but had no effect in cells at passage 8. 5-aza-dC treatment had no effect on SMCs at passage 1 but efficiently restored lactate transport in cells at passage 8 (M–P).

If reexpressed MCT3 induced by demethylation is functional, we reasoned then that lactate transport might be restored in passage 8 SMCs after 5-aza-dC treatment. Indeed, confocal microscopic analysis revealed a decrease in pHi in these cells after lactate incubation equivalent to that seen in passage 1 SMCs. In contrast, 5-aza-dC treatment did not induce a detectable change in the capacity for lactate transport in passage 1 cells (Figure 7M–7P). These data, in conjunction with the MCT3 reactivation results, indicate that lactate transport in contractile SMCs is mediated by MCT3, which is further modulated by DNA methylation.

To investigate the significance of MCT3 methylation in affecting SMC function, we treated passage 2 SMCs, proliferating SMCs that still express high levels of MCT3, with 4 MCT3-specific and 1 scrambled siRNA control oligonucleotides. As shown in Figure 8, MCT3-specific siRNA markedly and dose-dependently reduced MCT3 mRNA and protein expression and stimulated SMC proliferation, whereas the scrambled siRNA control had no effect. These data indicate that MCT3 inhibition and the subsequently impaired lactate transport and intracellular acidification may result in enhanced SMC proliferation, contributing to neointimal hyperplasia.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. siRNA-mediated MCT3 knockdown stimulates SMC proliferation. SMCs at passage 2 were transfected with 4 MCT3 siRNAs and 1 scrambled siRNA control. MCT3 siRNA S1–S4, but not scrambled siRNA control (C1), markedly and dose-dependently suppressed MCT3 mRNA expression at 48 hours, with MCT3 siRNA S4 being the most effective as detected by TRT-PCR (A). MCT3 siRNA S4, but not scrambled control C1, induced a dose-depended suppression of MCT3, but not of ß-actin, protein expression at 72 hours, as shown by Western blot (B). MCT3 siRNA S4 dose-dependently stimulated SMC proliferation at 96 hours after transfection, whereas control siRNA C1 had no effect (C). Values were obtained from experiments in triplicates and were repeated at least twice. Data are expressed as mean±SE. *P<0.05, **P<0.000001.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Atherosclerosis and cancers share many similarities in their pathogenesis. For example, they are susceptible to the same set of risk factors, including aging and smoking, and involve aberrant cell proliferation in their disease processes. Interestingly, global DNA hypomethylation and locus-specific hypermethylation, which have received considerable attention in the cancer research field,8 have been inadequately studied in relation to atherosclerosis. Indeed, it is conceivable that DNA methylation might play a more predominant role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, in that, unlike oncogenesis, which has been linked to base-pair change, deletion, insertion, recombination, and amplification of oncogenes (genomitis), atherogenesis involves mainly changes in gene function rather than structural mutations. The functional changes may result from alterations in gene expression due to polymorphisms, most commonly single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and differential epigenetic changes, in particular, DNA methylation. Although completion of human genome sequencing has led to global gene expression profiling and SNP searching becoming busy industries, epigenetic research has not gathered momentum in the field of atherosclerosis. The findings presented in this report underscore the importance of DNA methylation in atherogenesis, suggesting that DNA methylation may represent an important process whereby atherosclerosis risk factors affect the function of the genome, a responsive organ of the cell, and induce atherosclerotic changes. Our data also shed light on understanding of the regulation of monocarboxylate transport in the vessel wall, a previously unrecognized biological aspect, in particular with respect to atherosclerosis.

MCT3, originally cloned from a chicken RPE expression library, is thought to be preferentially expressed in the RPE.4–6 Using multiple approaches including quantitative TRT-PCR and Western blotting, we have unequivocally demonstrated the expression of MCT3 mRNA and protein in normal tunica media of the vessel wall. These data provide evidence, for the first time, of MCT3 expression in an extra-RPE tissue. Furthermore, MCT3 exhibited a passage-dependent decrease in cultured SMCs and a lesion-dependent decrease in atherosclerotic vessels. Immunohistochemical staining revealed that the lack of MCT3 expression was restricted to proliferating/synthetic SMCs residing in the neointima in atherosclerotic coronary arteries, indicating that the SMC phenotypic switch may serve as a trigger for MCT3 silencing. These findings provide a basis for the use of the tunica media and cultured SMCs as proxies for SMC expressers and nonexpressers, respectively, to investigate the mechanisms that control MCT3 expression, as described in this study.

DNA methylation has emerged as an important epigenetic modification that regulates gene transcription. In general, DNA methylation represses transcription, and loss of methylation is associated with gene activation.14 Many previous studies have focused on the gene-silencing effects of methylation of CpG islands located in promoter and exon 1 regions.15 The conventional wisdom is that DNA methylation in these transcription initiation regions can either directly interfere with transcription factor binding or indirectly via methyl-CpG binding proteins, which can mediate histone modification by recruiting histone deacetylases to methylated DNA. Although it is clear that promoter hypermethylation is an important mechanism in suppressing gene expression, recent evidence indicates that DNA methylation in the coding regions also serves as a silencer. Indeed, using patch-methylated stable episomes in human 293 cells, Hsieh12 and Irvine et al13 have demonstrated that methylation of the coding region of a luciferase gene represses transcription 5-fold more effectively than does methylation of the Rous sarcoma virus long terminal repeat promoter. Furthermore, methylation impacts transcriptional elongation more than initiation in fungi.16,17 By using the Cre/loxP-based system, RMCE, to introduce a transgene methylated exclusively in a region downstream of the promoter into a specific genomic site, Lorincz et al18 found that dense, intragenic DNA methylation in mammalian cells initiates formation of a chromatin structure that reduces the efficiency of Pol II elongation, resulting in transcriptional silencing. In this study, genomic bisulfite sequencing was used to map methylated residues for 27 of the 59 analyzable scattered CpG dinucleotides located in the promoter region and 2 CpG islands residing in the coding region of MCT3. These CpG residues are considered critical for gene silencing, compared with scattered CpG sites in the coding region, the methylation of which is less likely to exert an obvious effect in transcription and was therefore not investigated in this study. We demonstrated complete CpG dinucleotide methylation in the MCT3 promoter region regardless of SMC phenotype (differentiated versus dedifferentiated) and MCT3 expression status. The data indicate that methylation of scattered CpG dinucleotides dose not contribute to MCT3 gene silencing. Complete methylation of MCT3 in RPE further supports this notion and argues against the possibility that an alternative, cell type–specific promoter may be operative in SMCs. The findings, however, do not rule out the possibility that methylation of scattered CpGs in the promoter, in particular those present within transcription factor binding sites, affects expression of other genes.

A low, basal level of random methylation was found in <5% of the CpG dinucleotides in the CpG island located in exon 4, the level of which did not differ with SMC phenotype and MCT3 expression status, thereby excluding involvement of exon 4 methylation in MCT3 silencing. In contrast, bisulfite sequencing analysis of the CpG island located in exon 2 revealed a specific methylation pattern that was inversely correlated with MCT3 expression at both protein and mRNA levels in cultured SMCs at different passage numbers and in aortas with varying degrees of atherosclerosis burden, suggesting that methylation at these sites may account for the decreased expression of this gene. This conclusion is supported by the reactivation of MCT3 mRNA and protein expression and the restoration of monocarboxylate transport function, together with demethylation in this region, after 5-aza-dC treatment of 4 SMC strains at passage 8. It is noteworthy, however, that monocyte and macrophage infiltration and the accumulation of extracellular matrix proteins within the atherosclerotic plaque may also contribute to the observed decrease in MCT3 protein expression, as measured by Western blotting, which is based on equal loading of proteins.

SMCs not only produce lactate through glycolysis but also take it up and use it as respiratory fuel.3 It has long been known that lactate cannot move freely from muscle to blood. Experiments with both in situ and isolated muscles have suggested that the translocation of lactate across the plasma membrane is mediated via the saturable, stereospecific MCT transport system that exhibits an obligatory 1:1 coupling between lactate and H+.3,19 By measuring the rate of decline in pHi after addition of 25 or 50 mmol/L lactate, which predominantly reflects the entry of lactate and H+ via the MCT transport system, the reverse of its normal physiological function when lactic acid derived from anaerobic metabolism is extruded from the cell, we found that monocarboxylate transport activity in SMCs at passage 1 was exclusively mediated via MCTs, because phloretin, an inhibitor of MCTs, and MCT3 siRNA completely abolished acidification after lactate incubation. The absence of monocarboxylate transport activity in SMCs at passage 8 and restoration of activity in these cells after 5-aza-dC treatment, coupled with the silencing and reactivation of MCT3 expression before and after 5-aza-dC incubation in these cells, respectively, point to a central role for MCT3 in SMCs, in particular, the differentiated tunica media. The lack of compensatory changes in MCT1, 2, and 4 expression and the inhibition of lactate transport by siRNA-mediated specific MCT3 knockdown lend further support to a key role for MCT3 in regulating monocarboxylate transport. Importantly, suppression of MCT3 expression by siRNA resulted in markedly enhanced proliferation of SMCs, which links MCT3 methylation and silencing to neointimal hyperplasia in atherosclerosis.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (5RO1 HL 071536-8, 1RO1 AG 023073-01, and P01 HL73042-02) to Dr Goldschmidt-Clermont.


*    Footnotes
 
The online-only Data Supplement can be found at http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.519025/DC1.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Viles-Gonzalez JF, Anand SX, Valdiviezo C, Zafar MU, Hutter R, Sanz J, Rius T, Poon M, Fuster V, Badimon JJ. Update in atherothrombotic disease. Mt Sinai J Med. 2004; 71: 197–208.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Rader DJ, Cohen J, Hobbs HH. Monogenic hypercholesterolemia: new insights in pathogenesis and treatment. J Clin Invest. 2003; 111: 1795–1803.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Juel C. Current aspects of lactate exchange: lactate/H+ transport in human skeletal muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001; 86: 12–16.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Halestrap AP, Price NT. The proton-linked monocarboxylate transporter (MCT) family: structure, function and regulation. Biochem J. 1999; 343 (pt 2): 281–299.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Philp NJ, Yoon H, Lombardi L. Mouse MCT3 gene is expressed preferentially in retinal pigment and choroid plexus epithelia. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001; 280: C1319–C1326.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Grollman EF, Philp NJ, McPhie P, Ward RD, Sauer B. Determination of transport kinetics of chick MCT3 monocarboxylate transporter from retinal pigment epithelium by expression in genetically modified yeast. Biochemistry. 2000; 39: 9351–9357.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Jaenisch R, Bird A. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat Genet. 2003; 33 (suppl): 245–254.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Feinberg AP, Tycko B. The history of cancer epigenetics. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004; 4: 143–153.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Dong C, Yoon W, Goldschmidt-Clermont PJ. DNA methylation and atherosclerosis. J Nutr. 2002; 132: 2406S–2409S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Ying AK, Hassanain HH, Roos CM, Smiraglia DJ, Issa JJ, Michler RE, Caligiuri M, Plass C, Goldschmidt-Clermont PJ. Methylation of the estrogen receptor-{alpha} gene promoter is selectively increased in proliferating human aortic smooth muscle cells. Cardiovasc Res. 2000; 46: 172–179.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Strong JP, Malcom GT, Oalmann MC, Wissler RW. The PDAY Study: natural history, risk factors, and pathobiology; Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997; 811: 226–235.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Hsieh CL. Stability of patch methylation and its impact in regions of transcriptional initiation and elongation. Mol Cell Biol. 1997; 17: 5897–5904.[Abstract]

13. Irvine RA, Lin IG, Hsieh CL. DNA methylation has a local effect on transcription and histone acetylation. Mol Cell Biol. 2002; 22: 6689–6696.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Nan X, Ng HH, Johnson CA, Laherty CD, Turner BM, Eisenman RN, Bird A. Transcriptional repression by the methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 involves a histone deacetylase complex. Nature. 1998; 393: 386–389.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Antequera F, Bird A. CpG islands as genomic footprints of promoters that are associated with replication origins. Curr Biol. 1999; 9: R661–R667.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Barry C, Faugeron G, Rossignol JL. Methylation induced premeiotically in Ascobolus: coextension with DNA repeat lengths and effect on transcript elongation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993; 90: 4557–4561.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Rountree MR, Selker EU. DNA methylation inhibits elongation but not initiation of transcription in Neurospora crassa. Genes Dev. 1997; 11: 2383–2395.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Lorincz MC, Dickerson DR, Schmitt M, Groudine M. Intragenic DNA methylation alters chromatin structure and elongation efficiency in mammalian cells. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004; 11: 1068–1075.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Poole RC, Halestrap AP. Transport of lactate and other monocarboxylates across mammalian plasma membranes. Am J Physiol. 1993; 264: C761–C782.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
112/9/1353    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.104.519025v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, S.
Right arrow Articles by Dong, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, S.
Right arrow Articles by Dong, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Gene expression
Right arrow Gene regulation
Right arrow Ion channels/membrane transport
Right arrow Smooth muscle proliferation and differentiation
Right arrow Mechanism of atherosclerosis/growth factors