Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2005;112:384-386
Published online before print July 5, 2005, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.493338
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
112/3/384    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.104.493338v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kamiya, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sunagawa, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kamiya, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sunagawa, K.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*PHENYLEPHRINE
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardio-renal physiology/pathophysiology
Right arrow Autonomic, reflex, and neurohumoral control of circulation

(Circulation. 2005;112:384-386.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Hypertension

Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity Averaged Over 1 Minute Parallels Renal and Cardiac Sympathetic Nerve Activity in Response to a Forced Baroreceptor Pressure Change

Atsunori Kamiya, MD, PhD; Toru Kawada, MD, PhD; Kenta Yamamoto, PhD; Daisaku Michikami, PhD; Hideto Ariumi, PhD; Tadayoshi Miyamoto, PhD; Kazunori Uemura, MD; Masaru Sugimachi, MD, PhD; Kenji Sunagawa, MD, PhD

From the Department of Cardiovascular Dynamics (A.K., T.K., K.Y., D.M., H.A., T.M., K.U., M.S.), National Cardiovascular Center Research Institute, Osaka, and the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (K.S.), Kyusyu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan.

Correspondence to Atsunori Kamiya, MD, PhD, Department of Cardiovascular Dynamics, National Cardiovascular Center Research Institute, Osaka, 565-8565, Japan. E-mail kamiya{at}ri.ncvc.go.jp

Received July 20, 2004; revision received December 1, 2004; accepted December 27, 2004.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Despite the accumulated knowledge of human muscle sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) as measured by microneurography, whether muscle SNA parallels renal and cardiac SNAs remains unknown.

Method and Results— In experiment 1, muscle (microneurography, tibial nerve), renal, and cardiac SNAs were recorded in anesthetized rabbits (n=6) while arterial pressure was changed by intravenous bolus injections of nitroprusside (3 µg/kg) followed by phenylephrine (3 µg/kg). In experiment 2, the carotid sinus region was vascularly isolated in anesthetized, vagotomized, and aorta-denervated rabbits (n=10). The 3 SNAs were recorded while intracarotid sinus pressure was increased stepwise from 40 to 160 mm Hg in 20-mm Hg increments maintained for 60 seconds each. Muscle SNA averaged over 1 minute was well correlated with renal (r=0.96±0.01, mean±SE) and cardiac (r=0.96±0.01) SNAs in experiment 1 (baroreflex closed-loop condition) and also with renal (r=0.97±0.01) and cardiac (r=0.97±0.01) SNAs in experiment 2 (baroreflex open-loop condition).

Conclusions— Muscle SNA averaged over 1 minute parallels renal and cardiac SNAs in response to a forced baroreceptor pressure change.


Key Words: catecholamines • muscles • nervous system, autonomic • nervous system, sympathetic


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) plays a crucial role in controlling circulation both in healthy humans and in patients with cardiovascular diseases.1 Activation of SNA increases heart rate, cardiac contractility, peripheral vascular resistance, and arterial pressure. Pathologically elevated SNA worsens survival in chronic heart failure and can induce lethal arrhythmias. Therefore, SNA has been an important target in the study of cardiovascular physiology and pathophysiology. In humans, activities of sympathetic nerves innervating blood vessels in skeletal muscles (muscle SNA) have been measured directly by microneurographic techniques2–4 and considered a proxy of systemic SNA. Those studies have contributed greatly to the understanding of the significance of SNA in circulatory physiology5 (including exercise,6 aging,7,8 and baroreflex9) and pathophysiology (including hypertension,10 heart failure,11 myocardial infarction,12 and neurally mediated syncope13).

Despite the accumulated knowledge about muscle SNA, whether muscle SNA parallels other SNAs innervating visceral organs, including the kidney and heart, remains unknown. The reason is that the human microneurographic technique is limited to measurements in the upper and lower extremities, face, and mouth.2,5 Because the kidney and heart are important organs for circulatory control, the relation between muscle SNA and renal or cardiac SNA is very important. Accordingly, by recording calf muscle SNA by microneurography simultaneously with renal and cardiac SNAs in anesthetized rabbits, we sought to determine whether muscle SNA averaged over 1 minute truly parallels renal and cardiac SNAs in response to baroreflex forcing.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Animals were cared for in accordance with the Guiding Principles for the Care and Use of Animals in the Field of Physiological Science approved by the Japanese Physiological Society. Sixteen Japanese white rabbits (2.4 to 3.3 kg) were anesthetized by intravenous injection (2 mL/kg) of a mixture of urethane and {alpha}-chloralose14 and were mechanically ventilated with O2-enriched room air. Body temperature was maintained at 38°C with a heating pad. Arterial pressure (AP) was measured with a high-fidelity pressure transducer (Millar Instruments) inserted retrogradely from the right femoral artery.

After a retroperitoneal incision was made and a middle thoracotomy performed, left renal and left cardiac SNAs were recorded by stainless steel wire electrodes (Bioflex wire AS633, Cooner Wire).14 After the flexors in the dorsal middle region of the right thigh were incised, a tungsten microelectrode (model 26-05-1, Federick Haer Co) was inserted into the left tibial nerve to record muscle SNA, based on human2,15 and animal16 microneurography. We identified muscle SNA by the following discharge characteristics: (1) afferent activity induced by tapping of the calf muscles but not by gently touching the skin and (2) excitatory and inhibitory responses to a decrease and an increase in baroreceptor pressure, respectively. The nerve fibers peripheral to the electrodes were ligated securely to eliminate afferent signals. The preamplified signals of SNAs were bandpass filtered at 150 to 1000 Hz except those of muscle SNA in experiment 2 (480 to 5000 Hz). These signals were full-wave rectified and lowpass filtered (cutoff frequency, 30 Hz) to quantify nerve activity.

Experiment 1: Baroreflex Closed-Loop Condition
The rabbits were maintained in a supine position (n=6). All baroreceptor afferents and vagal nerves were intact. Three SNAs and AP were recorded at a 200-Hz sampling rate with a 12-bit analog-to-digital converter. After 2 minutes of baseline recording, nitroprusside (3 µg/kg) and, after a 2-minute delay, phenylephrine (3 µg/kg), was injected as a bolus via the right femoral vein. The data were stored on the hard disk of a dedicated laboratory computer system for later analysis.

Experiment 2: Baroreflex Open-Loop Condition
To strictly control baroreceptor pressure (n=10 rabbits), a baroreflex loop was opened by vascular isolation of the carotid sinuses.14 Bilateral intracarotid sinus pressure (CSP) was controlled by a servo-controlled piston pump.14 Bilateral vagal and aortic depressor nerves were sectioned at the middle of the neck to eliminate reflexes from the cardiopulmonary region and the aortic arch. After surgical preparation, CSP was increased stepwise from 40 to 160 mm Hg in increments of 20 mm Hg. Each pressure step was maintained for 60 seconds. The 3 SNAs were recorded and stored as in protocol 1.

Data and Statistical Analysis
We averaged SNAs over 1 minute and generated scatterplots for muscle SNA against renal or cardiac SNA. For each type of SNA, 100 and 0 arbitrary units (AU) were assigned to the maximum 1-minute SNA value and the noise level determined by intravenous infusion of hexamethonium bromide (6 mg/kg),16 respectively. The other SNA signals were then normalized to these values. The correlation coefficients (r) for muscle SNA versus renal or cardiac SNA were determined.

In protocol 2, the relation between CSP and SNA was characterized by a 4-parameter logistic equation model: y=P4+(P1/{1+exp[P2(xP3)]}), where y is SNA and x is CSP; P1 is the response range of SNA; P2 is the coefficient for calculation of gain; P3 is the CSP corresponding to the midpoint of the operation; and P4 is minimum SNA. All data are presented as mean±SD, and P<0.05 was considered significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
In experiment 1 (baroreflex closed-loop condition), nitroprusside injection decreased AP by 16±3 mm Hg while muscle SNA was increased. Subsequent phenylephrine injection increased AP by 41±9 mm Hg while muscle SNA was decreased. Thereafter, as AP gradually decreased, muscle SNA was again increased. These responses of muscle SNA were similar to those of renal and cardiac SNAs (Figure 1A). When presented as SNA averaged over 1 minute, the relations of muscle SNA against renal SNA and cardiac SNA were both close to the line of identity (Figure 1B). All animals showed strong correlations between 1-minute muscle and renal SNAs (r=0.96±0.01, mean±SE; range, 0.93 to 0.98) and between 1-minute muscle and cardiac SNAs (r=0.96±0.01; range, 0.93 to 0.99).



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Experiment 1. A, Representative integrated signals of renal, cardiac, and muscle SNA during intravenous bolus injections of nitroprusside (time point N) followed by phenylephrine (time point P). Fine and bold lines indicate SNA signals resampled at 10 Hz and those averaged over 1 minute, respectively. B, Scatterplots of 1-minute muscle SNA against 1-minute renal and cardiac SNAs of same data shown in A. C, Representative original (upper panels) and integrated (lower panels) signals of 3 SNAs before pharmacological injection from 1 animal. R-M indicates renal vs muscle SNAs; C-M, cardiac vs muscle SNAs.

In experiment 2 (baroreflex open-loop condition), muscle SNA decreased in response to nonpulsatile and stepwise increases in CSP, similar to renal and cardiac SNAs (Figure 2A). All animals showed strong correlations between 1-minute muscle and renal SNAs (r=0.97±0.01; range, 0.96 to 0.99) and between 1-minute muscle and cardiac SNAs (r=0.97±0.01; range, 0.95 to 0.99). The baroreflex relation of muscle SNA against CSP was almost superimposable on that of renal or cardiac SNA in individual animals. The parameters in a reverse-sigmoid logistic function fitted in muscle SNA were similar to those in renal or cardiac SNA: P1=99±1, 97±1, and 96±1 AU; P2=0.11±0.02, 0.12±0.01, and 0.14±0.03 AU/mm Hg; P3=99±4, 103±4, and 103±4 mm Hg; and P4=3±2, 3±2, and 3±2 AU in muscle, renal, and cardiac SNAs, respectively.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Experiment 2. A, Representative integrated signals of renal, cardiac, and muscle SNA during 1-minute stepwise increases in CSP from 1 animal. Fine and bold lines indicate SNAs resampled at 10 Hz and those averaged over 1 minute, respectively. B, Scatterplots of 1-minute muscle SNA against renal and cardiac SNAs. C, Sigmoidal baroreflex relation between each SNA and CSP. B and C used same data as shown in A. R-M indicates renal vs muscle SNAs; C-M, cardiac vs muscle SNAs.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Despite accumulated data of muscle SNA as measured by microneurography in human studies, whether muscle SNA parallels other SNAs controlling cardiovascular organs remains unclear. The major new finding in this study is that 1-minute muscle SNA was correlated strongly with both renal and cardiac SNAs, with r at nearly unity, in both baroreflex closed- and open-loop conditions. This finding supports our hypothesis that muscle SNA averaged over 1 minute parallels renal and cardiac SNAs in response to baroreflex forcing. Our finding suggests that microneurographic muscle SNA is a useful proxy for renal and cardiac SNA in addressing baroreflex control of SNA.

Earlier human studies3,4 reported that microneurographic muscle SNA was correlated with noradrenaline spillovers in the kidney (r2=0.58) and heart (r2=0.49) at rest, suggesting a correlation between muscle SNA and cardiac or renal SNA. However, because spillover values are affected by neurotransmitter kinetics in synapses (release and uptake) and circulating noradrenaline independent of SNA,17 these results are not definitive. The present study complemented and extended the human studies by recording these SNAs directly and demonstrated stronger correlations (r>0.95) between muscle SNA and cardiac or renal SNA than earlier studies of spillover technique.

Previous studies reported a greater response of splenic SNA to baroceptor pressure changes than those of cardiac and renal SNAs in cats, suggesting regional differences in SNAs,18 but those studies did not investigate muscle SNA. Additionally, these regional differences were detected in faster SNAs averaged over 4 to 8 seconds.18,19 The present study investigated 1-minute SNA and hence did not address the relation between faster muscle SNA and renal or cardiac SNA.

The present study does not contradict earlier findings that indicated regionally different SNA responses to physiological stresses other than baroreceptor pressure changes. For example, the human cold pressor test increased muscle SNA but not heart rate.20

Limitations
The anesthetic, artificial respiration, and surgical procedures used in this study may affect SNAs. In addition, experiment 2 was performed under a nonphysiological condition and did not investigate baroreflex hysteresis. We bandpass filtered all SNAs at the same condition (150 to 1000 Hz) except muscle SNA in experiment 2 (480 to 5000 Hz, human study condition).2 However, this did not affect the interpretation of data, because both experiments 1 and 2 showed strong correlations between muscle SNA and renal or cardiac SNA.

Conclusion
Muscle SNA averaged over 1 minute parallels renal and cardiac SNAs in response to a forced baroreceptor pressure change.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by the Industrial Technology Research Grant Program, grant No. 03A47075, from the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization of Japan.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Rowell LB. Human Cardiovascular Control. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993.

2. Mano T. Microneurography as a tool to investigate sympathetic nerve responses to environmental stress. Aviakosm Ekolog Med. 1997; 31: 8–14.

3. Wallin BG, Esler M, Dorward P, Eisenhofer G, Ferrier C, Westerman R, Jennings G. Simultaneous measurements of cardiac noradrenaline spillover and sympathetic outflow to skeletal muscle in humans. J Physiol. 1992; 453: 45–58.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Wallin BG, Thompson JM, Jennings GL, Esler MD. Renal noradrenaline spillover correlates with muscle sympathetic activity in humans. J Physiol. 1996; 491: 881–887.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Mitchell JH, Victor RG. Neural control of the cardiovascular system: insights from muscle sympathetic nerve recordings in humans. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996; 28 (suppl): S60–S69.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Victor RG, Pryor SL, Secher NH, Mitchell JH. Effects of partial neuromuscular blockade on sympathetic nerve responses to static exercise in humans. Circ Res. 1989; 65: 468–476.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Markel TA, Daley JC 3rd, Hogeman CS, Herr MD, Khan MH, Gray KS, Kunselman AR, Sinoway LI. Aging and the exercise pressor reflex in humans. Circulation. 2003; 107: 675–678.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Tanaka H, Davy KP, Seals DR. Cardiopulmonary baroreflex inhibition of sympathetic nerve activity is preserved with age in healthy humans. J Physiol. 1999; 515: 249–254.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Rudas L, Crossman AA, Morillo CA, Halliwill JR, Tahvanainen KU, Kuusela TA, Eckberg DL. Human sympathetic and vagal baroreflex responses to sequential nitroprusside and phenylephrine. Am J Physiol. 1999; 276: H1691–H1698.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Grassi G, Cattaneo BM, Seravalle G, Lanfranchi A, Mancia G. Baroreflex control of sympathetic nerve activity in essential and secondary hypertension. Hypertension. 1998; 31: 68–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Grassi G, Seravalle G, Cattaneo BM, Lanfranchi A, Vailati S, Giannattasio C, Del Bo A, Sala C, Bolla GB, Pozzi M. Sympathetic activation and loss of reflex sympathetic control in mild congestive heart failure. Circulation. 1995; 92: 3206–3211.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Graham LN, Smith PA, Stoker JB, Mackintosh AF, Mary DA. Time course of sympathetic neural hyperactivity after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2002; 106: 793–797.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Mosqueda-Garcia R, Furlan R, Tank J, Fernandez-Violante R. The elusive pathophysiology of neurally mediated syncope. Circulation. 2000; 102: 2898–2906.[Free Full Text]

14. Kawada T, Shishido T, Inagaki M, Tatewaki T, Zheng C, Yanagiya Y, Sugimachi M, Sunagawa K. Differential dynamic baroreflex regulation of cardiac and renal sympathetic nerve activities. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001; 280: H1581–H1590.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Sundlof G, Wallin BG. Human muscle nerve sympathetic activity at rest: relationship to blood pressure and age. J Physiol. 1978; 274: 621–637.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Nakamura T, Kawahara K, Kusunoki M, Feng Z. Microneurography in anesthetized rats for the measurement of sympathetic nerve activity in the sciatic nerve. J Neurosci Methods. 2003; 131: 35–39.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Jennings GL. Noradrenaline spillover and microneurography measurements in patients with primary hypertension. J Hypertens Suppl. 1998; 16: S35–S38.

18. Ninomiya I, Matsukawa K, Honda T, Nishiura N, Nabuchi A, Nisimaru N, Irisawa H. Sympathetic nerve activity to the spleen, kidney, and heart in response to baroceptor input. Am J Physiol. 1971; 221: 491–506.

19. Ninomiya I, Matsukawa K, Honda T, Nishiura N, Nabuchi A. Effects of baroceptor reflex on cardiac and renal sympathetic nerve activity before and after atropinization in awake cats at rest. Jpn J Physiol. 1988; 38: 491–506.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Fu Q, Levine BD, Pawelczyk JA, Ertl AC, Diedrich A, Cox JF, Zuckerman JH, Ray CA, Smith ML, Iwase S, Saito M, Sugiyama Y, Mano T, Zhang R, Iwasaki K, Lane LD, Buckey JC Jr, Cooke WH, Robertson RM, Baisch FJ, Blomqvist CG, Eckberg DL, Robertson D, Biaggioni I. Cardiovascular and sympathetic neural responses to handgrip and cold pressor stimuli in humans before, during and after spaceflight. J Physiol. 2002; 544: 653–664.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Ramchandra, S. G. Hood, D. A. Denton, R. L. Woods, M. J. McKinley, R. M. McAllen, and C. N. May
Basis for the preferential activation of cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in heart failure
PNAS, January 20, 2009; 106(3): 924 - 928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
K. Yamamoto, T. Kawada, A. Kamiya, H. Takaki, T. Shishido, K. Sunagawa, and M. Sugimachi
Muscle mechanoreflex augments arterial baroreflex-mediated dynamic sympathetic response to carotid sinus pressure
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2008; 295(3): H1081 - H1089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
112/3/384    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.104.493338v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kamiya, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sunagawa, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kamiya, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sunagawa, K.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*PHENYLEPHRINE
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardio-renal physiology/pathophysiology
Right arrow Autonomic, reflex, and neurohumoral control of circulation