Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2005;112:IV-126-IV-132
Published online before print November 28, 2005, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.166564
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
112/24_suppl/IV-126    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.105.166564v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow AHA Statements and Guidelines

(Circulation. 2005;112:IV-126 – IV-132.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care

Part 10.2: Toxicology in ECC


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
*Introduction
down arrowDrug-Induced Emergencies:...
down arrowSummary
down arrowReferences
 
Poisoning is an infrequent cause of cardiac arrest in older patients, but it is a leading cause of cardiac arrest in victims <40 years of age.1–4 When a patient with poisoning is in cardiac arrest or near-arrest, immediate support of airway, breathing, and circulation is essential. Urgent consultation with a medical toxicologist or certified regional poison center is recommended5,6 because standard guidelines for emergency cardiovascular care may not be optimal in the management of acute poisoning and overdose.

This section presents recommendations for the care of the patient with a toxicologic problem. Some recommendations are evidence-based, but most toxicology research in this area consists primarily of small case series (LOE 5), case reports, and animal studies (LOE 6). Hence many of these recommendations are based on expert consensus, and further research is needed to validate them.

Clinicians may see a patient with a history of ingestion of an unknown substance. In such cases the clinician must be familiar with common toxidromes and their therapies. To assist during such encounters, Table 1 lists drug-induced cardiovascular emergencies or altered vital signs, potential therapies to consider, and interventions that should be used with caution.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Drug-Induced Cardiovascular Emergencies or Altered Vital Signs*:Therapies to Consider{dagger}and Contraindicated Interventions

Clinicians may also encounter patients with a history of known ingestion. Then the clinician must anticipate the complications from that substance and be prepared to treat them. Table 2 lists potentially cardiotoxic drugs, signs of toxicity, and therapy to consider.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Potentially Cardiotoxic Drugs: Cardiopulmonary Signs* of Toxicity and Therapy to Consider{dagger}


*    Drug-Induced Emergencies: Prearrest
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
*Drug-Induced Emergencies:...
down arrowSummary
down arrowReferences
 
Airway and Respiratory Management
Poisoned patients may deteriorate rapidly. Providers must assess and frequently reassess airway, breathing, and circulation and support them as needed. Although consultation with a poison control center or toxicologist may be needed to identify a particular toxin or antidote, the first priority of care is support of airway, breathing, and circulation. In patients who are obtunded or comatose, perform rapid sequence intubation before gastric lavage to decrease the risk of aspiration. Gastric lavage is recommended only for patients who have ingested a potentially lethal amount of a drug or toxin and present within 1 hour of ingestion.7

Reversal of benzodiazepine intoxication with flumazenil is associated with significant toxicity in patients with benzodiazepine dependence8–12 or coingestion of proconvulsant medications such as tricyclic antidepressants. But it may be useful to reverse excessive sedation when benzodiazepines are used for procedural sedation.13 Thus, the routine use of flumazenil in "coma cocktail" protocols is not recommended.

Opiate Poisoning
Opiate poisoning commonly causes respiratory depression followed by respiratory insufficiency or arrest. Heroin overdose may cause respiratory depression, and it frequently causes pulmonary edema. The respiratory effects of opioids are rapidly reversed by the opiate antagonist naloxone.

In the hospital setting the administration of naloxone for acute opioid exposure has been successful without prior ventilation (LOE: 414,15; 516,17; 718) if the airway was maintained and high-flow oxygen administered and the patient was otherwise healthy with no chronic opioid addiction and no cardiovascular disease. In the out-of-hospital setting, however, the evidence indicates fewer adverse events when emergency medical services (EMS) system personnel provide ventilation (ie, provide positive-pressure ventilation with bag and mask) before administration of naloxone to all patients with opioid-induced respiratory depression (LOE 519–21 in adults, extrapolated from pediatric cases [LOE 722,23; LOE 8]).24 The adverse effects seen in patients receiving naloxone prior to ventilation may be due to the underlying cardiovascular disorders or chronic epileptic conditions, and thus the hazards of naloxone might be overstated in some cases.

As a general practice for the treatment of suspected opiate overdose, providers should try to support ventilation before administration of naloxone. Naloxone may be administered before intubation (ie, with bag and mask), however, because significant complications after administration of naloxone are uncommon and effective reversal of opiate-induced respiratory depression may make intubation unnecessary. Naloxone can be administered by the intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), intranasal, or subcutaneous (SC) routes. IV is preferred. If the patient is already intubated and vascular access is not available, naloxone may be administered by the endotracheal route, although a slightly higher dose may be needed than that administered by other routes. There is only anecdotal (case report) support for endotracheal administration of naloxone for opioid overdose; intravenous and other routes (SC, IM) are preferred to the endotracheal route.

The duration of action of naloxone is approximately 45 to 70 minutes, but respiratory depression may persist for 4 to 5 hours with opiate ingestion or overdose. Thus, the clinical effects of naloxone may not last as long as those of a significant opioid overdose, and repeat doses of naloxone may be needed. The end points of opiate reversal are adequate airway reflexes and ventilation, not complete arousal.

Acute withdrawal from opiates produces a state of sympathetic excess and severe agitation. Pulmonary edema and ventricular arrhythmias are less common complications. Naloxone reversal of opiate intoxication should be used with caution in patients who are suspected of being opiate-dependent, especially if they have cardiovascular disease.

In the emergency setting the recommended adult dose range is 0.4 mg to 2 mg IV or 0.4 mg to 0.8 mg IM or SC, repeated as needed. Some opiate overdoses may require titration to a total naloxone dose of 6 to 10 mg over a short period. For the patient with chronic opioid addiction, use smaller dose and titrate slowly to minimize adverse cardiovascular effects and withdrawal symptoms. There is no good evidence to suggest that naloxone improves outcome in the patient with an opioid-induced cardiac arrest. Thus, once arrest has occurred, normal guidelines for advanced cardiovascular life support (ACLS) should be followed, with airway control coming before use of naloxone (Class IIa).19–21

Drug-Induced Hemodynamically Significant Bradycardia
Hemodynamically significant bradycardia from poisoning or drug overdose may be refractory to standard ACLS protocols because some toxins bind receptors or produce direct cellular toxicity. In these cases specific antidote therapy may be needed.

Administration of atropine may be lifesaving in organophosphate, carbamate, or nerve agent poisoning (LOE 4).25 Atropine may be administered in an initial dose of 2 to 4 mg for bradycardia resulting from acetylcholinesterase-inhibiting agents, and large total doses may be required. Providers should notify the pharmacy to obtain a large amount (eg, 20 to 40 mg or higher) of atropine for use if needed.

Isoproterenol is contraindicated in acetylcholinesterase-induced bradycardias, although it may be useful at high doses in refractory bradycardia induced by ß-antagonist receptor blockade. Heart block and ventricular arrhythmias associated with digoxin or digitalis glycoside poisoning may be effectively treated with digoxin-specific antibody fragment therapy (LOE 5).26 Antibody-specific therapy may also be effective in poisoning caused by plants and Chinese herbal medications containing digitalis glycosides (LOE 2, 827,28; LOE 526). Transcutaneous pacing may be effective in mild to moderate hemodynamically significant bradycardia associated with poisoning and overdose.

Drug-Induced Hemodynamically Significant Tachycardia
Drug-induced hemodynamically significant tachycardia may cause myocardial ischemia, myocardial infarction, or ventricular arrhythmias and may lead to high-output heart failure and shock. Adenosine and synchronized cardioversion are unlikely to be of benefit in this context given the ongoing presence of a toxin. Some drug-induced tachyarrhythmias, however, may be successfully treated with adenosine (LOE 5).29 In patients with borderline hypotension, diltiazem and verapamil are contraindicated because they may further lower blood pressure.

Benzodiazepines such as diazepam or lorazepam are safe and effective in patients with drug-induced hemodynamically significant tachycardia resulting from sympathomimetic agents. When large quantities of benzodiazepines are used to treat poisoning or overdose, providers must closely monitor the patient’s level of consciousness, ventilatory effort, and respiratory function because the sedative effects of the benzodiazepines may produce respiratory depression and loss of protective airway reflexes.

Physostigmine is a specific antidote that may be preferable for drug-induced hemodynamically significant tachycardia and central anticholinergic syndrome caused by pure anticholinergic poisoning.30 Physostigmine must be used with caution because it can produce symptoms of cholinergic crisis such as copious tracheobronchial secretions (frequent suctioning will be required), seizures, bradycardia, and even asystole if given in excessive doses or given too rapidly. Often patients with anticholinergic intoxication can be managed with benzodiazepines alone, but at least one clinical study suggested that physostigmine used appropriately may offer superior results (LOE 4).30 Physostigmine should not be administered for anticholinergic symptoms associated with tricyclic antidepressant overdose. Consultation with a medical toxicologist or regional poison center is recommended.

Drug-Induced Hypertensive Emergencies
Benzodiazepines are the drug class of choice for treatment of drug-induced hypertension because they decrease the effects of endogenous catecholamine release. Hypotension may follow drug-induced hypertension, and aggressive control of blood pressure may not be warranted. Thus, short-acting antihypertensive agents, such as nitroprusside, are preferred in patients who are refractory to benzodiazepine therapy. Nonselective ß-antagonist receptor blocking agents, such as propranolol, are contraindicated in poisoning by sympathomimetic agents. Blockade of ß-receptors with unopposed {alpha}-receptor stimulation may worsen hypertension.31 Labetalol, a mixed {alpha}- and ß-receptor antagonist, may be used with caution as third-line therapy in patients with refractory drug-induced hypertension.

Drug-Induced Acute Coronary Syndromes
Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) can develop in patients with cocaine overdose. ACS results from coronary artery vasoconstriction with resultant coronary ischemia that is exacerbated by tachycardia and hypertension associated with excess sympathetic nervous system stimulation.

Fibrinolytics are thought to have a higher risk-to-benefit ratio when used in the context of drug-induced ACS, particularly in the presence of severe hypertension, so they should be used with caution if at all.32 Intracoronary administration of fibrinolytics or coronary vasodilators is preferred to peripheral administration.

Cardiac catheterization studies in cocaine overdose have shown that nitroglycerin and phentolamine reverse cocaine-induced vasoconstriction. Labetalol has no significant effect, and propranolol worsens it.33–36 Therefore, nitroglycerin and benzodiazepines are first-line agents, phentolamine is a second-line agent, and propranolol is contraindicated for cocaine-induced ACS. Although labetalol has been reported to be effective in isolated cases of cocaine toxicity,37,38 use of this agent is controversial because it blocks the peripheral signs of drug-induced sympathetic excess without affecting central nervous system effects such as seizures. Esmolol and metoprolol may induce hypotension.39

Drug-Induced Ventricular Tachycardia and Ventricular Fibrillation
When a patient develops sudden conversion to a wide-complex rhythm with hypotension, drug-induced ventricular tachycardia (VT) is likely and cardioversion is indicated. If the patient is unstable and polymorphic VT is present, use high-energy unsynchronized shocks (defibrillation doses).

Use of antiarrhythmics is indicated in cases of hemodynamically stable drug-induced VT. Lidocaine is the antiarrhythmic of choice in most cases of drug-induced monomorphic VT. Types IA and IC and other antiarrhythmics that block the fast sodium channel (eg, sotalol) are contraindicated in cases of poisoning with tricyclic antidepressants or other fast sodium channel blockers because of the risk of synergistic toxicity. The efficacy and safety of phenytoin for tricyclic antidepressant poisoning has been questioned and is no longer recommended.40,41 Magnesium has beneficial effects in certain cases of drug-induced VT (LOE 542), but it may also aggravate drug-induced hypotension.43,44

Torsades de pointes can occur with either therapeutic or toxic exposure to many drugs. Administration of magnesium is recommended for patients with torsades de pointes even when the serum magnesium concentration is normal (Class IIa). Summary of therapy:

High level studies have not established the safety and efficacy of any of these recommended therapies for drug-induced polymorphic VT (Class Indeterminate).

Drug-Induced Impaired Conduction
Hypertonic saline and systemic alkalinization may prevent or terminate VT secondary to poisoning from sodium channel blocking agents (eg, procainamide, flecainide) and tricyclic antidepressants (LOE 5).46,47 Sodium bicarbonate provides hypertonic saline and induces systemic alkalinization; hypertonic saline alone may be effective in treating the impaired conduction associated with these agents.48 When sodium bicarbonate is used to treat arrhythmias and hypotension, the goal of alkalinization is to maintain an arterial pH of 7.45 to 7.55 with repeated boluses of 1 to 2 mEq/kg of sodium bicarbonate. Although no study has investigated the optimal target pH with bicarbonate therapy, this pH range has been commonly accepted and seems reasonable. A maintenance infusion of 150 mEq/L of sodium bicarbonate plus 30 mEq KCl/L in D5W is recommended (Class IIa). Boluses of sodium bicarbonate are used without prior determination of serum pH for acute decompensation if the QRS duration is >100 milliseconds or if hypotension develops.

There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against the use of sodium bicarbonate in adults with calcium channel blocker overdose (Class Indeterminate). Calcium channel antagonist and ß-adrenergic antagonist overdose may lead to seriously impaired conduction. These patients may require chronotropic adrenergic agents such as epinephrine, use of glucagon in high doses (although the data to support this is inadequate and primarily limited to animal studies),49 or possibly pacing.50

Drug-Induced Shock
Drug-induced shock may produce a decrease in intravascular volume, a decrease in systemic vascular resistance (SVR), diminished myocardial contractility, or a combination of these factors. In addition, drugs can disable normal compensatory mechanisms. It is these combined aspects of cardiovascular dysfunction that render drug-induced shock refractory to many standard therapies.

Drug-Induced Hypovolemic Shock
Overdose of some drugs or chemicals (eg, zinc salts) can cause excessive fluid loss through the gastrointestinal tract, resulting in pure hypovolemia. Drug-induced shock, however, typically includes cardiovascular dysfunction with decreased myocardial contractility and low SVR that requires a combination of volume therapy and myocardial support. Initial treatment will require a fluid challenge to correct relative hypovolemia and optimize preload. In cardiotoxic poisoning congestive heart failure may limit tolerance of, and response to, fluid administration. Central hemodynamic monitoring with a pulmonary artery catheter may be required to titrate therapy.

Patients unresponsive to fluid loading may require inotrope or vasopressor support, or both. Dopamine is often the recommended initial agent. However, drug-induced shock following overdose of some drugs (eg, calcium channel blockers) will require administration and titration of a variety of cardiovascular medications.

Drug-Induced Distributive Shock
Distributive shock is associated with normal or even high cardiac output and low SVR. Treatment with {alpha}-adrenergic drugs such as norepinephrine or phenylephrine may be needed. Case reports suggest that vasopressin may also be useful.51 More powerful vasoconstrictors such as endothelin are not yet available in the United States and have not been well studied. Watch for the development of ventricular arrhythmias with the use of these agents. Caution: Avoid dobutamine and isoproterenol, which may worsen hypotension by further decreasing SVR.

Drug-Induced Cardiogenic Shock
Drug-induced cardiogenic shock is associated with low cardiac output and high SVR. Cardiac ischemia may also be present in these patients. In addition to volume titration and use of sympathomimetic drugs such as dobutamine, inotropic support may be provided by agents such as inamrinone, calcium, glucagon, insulin, or even isoproterenol, depending on the toxic agent(s) identified.52,53 Concurrent vasopressor therapy is often required.54

Drug-Induced Cardiac Arrest
Cardioversion/Defibrillation
Electric defibrillation is appropriate for pulseless patients with drug-induced VT or ventricular fibrillation (VF) and also for unstable patients with polymorphic VT. In cases of sympathomimetic poisoning with refractory VF, increase the interval between doses of epinephrine and use only standard dosing. Propranolol is contraindicated in cocaine overdose. It was thought to be contraindicated in sympathomimetic poisoning, but there are some case reports suggesting that it may be useful in the treatment of ephedrine and pseudoephedrine overdose.55

Prolonged CPR and Resuscitation
More prolonged CPR and resuscitation may be warranted in patients with poisoning or overdose, especially those with calcium channel blocker poisoning (LOE 5).56 In cases of severe poisoning, recovery with good neurologic outcomes has been reported in patients who received prolonged CPR (eg, 3 to 5 hours).52,53 Cardiopulmonary bypass (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) has been used successfully in resuscitation of patients with severe poisoning.57


*    Summary
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowDrug-Induced Emergencies:...
*Summary
down arrowReferences
 
Use of standard ACLS protocols for all patients who are critically poisoned may not result in an optimal outcome. Care of patients with severe poisoning can be enhanced by consultation with a medical toxicologist or regional poison center. Alternative approaches that may be effective in severely poisoned patients include


*    Footnotes
 
This special supplement to Circulation is freely available at http://www.circulationaha.org


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowDrug-Induced Emergencies:...
up arrowSummary
*References
 
1. Litovitz TL, Felberg L, White S, Klein-Schwartz W. 1995 annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers Toxic Exposure Surveillance System. Am J Emerg Med. 1996; 14: 487–537.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. McCaig LF, Burt CW. Poisoning-related visits to emergency departments in the United States, 1993–1996. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1999; 37: 817–826.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Fingerhut LA, Cox CS. Poisoning mortality, 1985–1995. Public Health Rep. 1998; 113: 218–233.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Watson WA, Litovitz TL, Klein-Schwartz W, Rodgers GC Jr, Youniss J, Reid N, Rouse WG, Rembert RS, Borys D. 2003 annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers Toxic Exposure Surveillance System. Am J Emerg Med. 2004; 22: 335–404.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Facility assessment guidelines for regional toxicology treatment centers. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1993; 31: 211–217.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Poison information and treatment systems. American College of Emergency Physicians. Ann Emerg Med. 1996; 28: 384.

7. Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, Vale JA. Position paper: single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2005; 43: 61–87.

8. Amrein R, Hetzel W, Hartmann D, Lorscheid T. Clinical pharmacology of flumazenil. Eur J Anaesth. 1988; 2: 65–80.

9. Amrein R, Leishman B, Bentzinger C, et al. Flumazenil in benzodiazepine antagonism: actions and clinical use in intoxications and anaesthesiology. Med Toxicol. 1987; 2: 411–429.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Flückiger A, Hartmann D, Leishman B, et al. Lack of effect of the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil (Ro 15-1788) on the performance of healthy subjects during experimentally induced ethanol intoxication. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1988; 34: 273–276.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Lukes SE, Griffiths RR. Precipitated withdrawal by a benzodiazepine receptor antagonist (Ro-15-1788) after 7 days of diazepam. Science. 1982; 217: 1161–1163.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Martens F, Köppel C, Ibe K, et al. Clinical experience with the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil in suspected benzodiazepine or ethanol poisoning. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1990; 28: 341–356.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Pitetti RD, Singh S, Pierce MC. Safe and efficacious use of procedural sedation and analgesia by nonanesthesiologists in a pediatric emergency department. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003; 157: 1090–1096.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Gill AM, Cousins A, Nunn AJ, Choonara JA. Opiate-induced respiratory depression in pediatric patients. Ann Pharmacother. 1996; 30: 125–129.[Abstract]

15. Herschel M, Kloshnood B, Lass NA. Role of naloxone in newborn resuscitation. Pediatrics. 2000; 106: 831–834.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Lewis JM, Klein-Schwartz W, Benson BE, Oderda GM, Takai S. Continuous naloxone infusion in pediatric narcotic overdose. Am J Dis Child. 1984; 138: 944–946.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Romac DR. Safety of prolonged, high-dose infusion of naloxone hydrochloride for severe methadone overdose. Clin Pharm. 1986; 5: 251–254.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Singhal N, McMillan DD, Yee WH, Akierman AR, Yee YJ. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the standardized neonatal resuscitation program. J Perinatol. 2001; 21: 388–392.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Osterwalder JJ. Naloxone—for intoxications with intravenous heroin and heroin mixtures—harmless or hazardous? A prospective clinical study. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1996; 34: 409–416.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Sporer KA, Firestone J, Isaacs SM. Out-of-hospital treatment of opioid overdoses in an urban setting. Acad Emerg Med. 1996; 3: 660–667.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Wanger K, Brough L, Macmillan I, Goulding J, MacPhail I, Christenson JM. Intravenous vs subcutaneous naloxone for out-of-hospital management of presumed opioid overdose. Acad Emerg Med. 1998; 5: 293–299.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Hasan RA, Benko AS, Nolan BM, Campe J, Duff J, Zureikat GY. Cardiorespiratory effects of naloxone in children. Ann Pharmacother. 2003; 37: 1587–1592.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Sporer KA. Acute heroin overdose. Ann Intern Med. 1999; 130: 584–590.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Schneir AB, Vadeboncoeur TF, Offerman SR, Barry JD, Ly BT, Williams SR, Clark RF. Massive OxyContin ingestion refractory to naloxone therapy. Ann Emerg Med. 2002; 40: 425–428.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Sungur M, Guven M. Intensive care management of organophosphate insecticide poisoning. Crit Care. 2001; 5: 211–215.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Bosse GM, Pope TM. Recurrent digoxin overdose and treatment with digoxin-specific Fab antibody fragments. J Emerg Med. 1994; 12: 179–185.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Eddleston M, Rajapakse S, Rajakanthan, Jayalath S, Sjostrom L, Santharaj W, Thenabadu PN, Sheriff MH, Warrell DA. Anti-digoxin Fab fragments in cardiotoxicity induced by ingestion of yellow oleander: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2000; 355: 967–972.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Dasgupta A, Szelei-Stevens KA. Neutralization of free digoxin-like immunoreactive components of oriental medicines Dan Shen and Lu-Shen-Wan by the Fab fragment of antidigoxin antibody (Digibind). Am J Clin Pathol. 2004; 121: 276–281.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Tracey JA, Cassidy N, Casey PB, Ali I. Bupropion (Zyban) toxicity. Ir Med J. 2002; 95: 23–24.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Burns MJ, Linden CH, Graudins A, Brown RM, Fletcher KE. A comparison of physostigmine and benzodiazepines for the treatment of anticholinergic poisoning. Ann Emerg Med. 2000; 35: 374–381.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Ramoska E, Sacchetti AD. Propranolol-induced hypertension in treatment of cocaine intoxication. Ann Emerg Med. 1985; 14: 1112–1113.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Hollander JE, Wilson LD, Shih LP. Complications from the use of thrombolytic agents in patients with cocaine associated chest pain. J Emerg Med. 1996; 14: 731–736.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Brogan WCI, Lange RA, Kim AS, Moliterno DJ, Hillis LD. Alleviation of cocaine-induced coronary vasoconstriction by nitroglycerin. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991; 18: 581–586.[Abstract]

34. Lange RA, Cigarroa RG, Yancy CW Jr, Willard JE, Popma JJ, Sills MN, McBride W, Kim AS, Hillis LD. Cocaine-induced coronary-artery vasoconstriction. N Engl J Med. 1989; 321: 1557–1562.[Abstract]

35. Lange RA, Cigarroa RG, Flores ED, McBride W, Kim AS, Wells PJ, Bedotto JB, Danziger RS, Hillis LD. Potentiation of cocaine-induced coronary vasoconstriction by beta-adrenergic blockade. Ann Intern Med. 1990; 112: 897–903.

36. Boehrer JD, Moliterno DJ, Willard JE, Hillis LD, Lange RA. Influence of labetalol on cocaine-induced coronary vasoconstriction in humans. Am J Med. 1993; 94: 608–610.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

37. Gay GR, Loper KA. The use of labetalol in the management of cocaine crisis. Ann Emerg Med. 1988; 17: 282–283.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

38. Dusenberry SJ, Hicks MJ, Mariani PJ. Labetalol treatment of cocaine toxicity. Ann Emerg Med. 1987; 16: 235.

39. Sand IC, Brody SL, Wrenn KD, Slovis CM. Experience with esmolol for the treatment of cocaine-associated cardiovascular complications. Am J Emerg Med. 1991; 9: 161–163.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

40. Mayron R, Ruiz E. Phenytoin: does it reverse tricyclic-antidepressant-induced cardiac conduction abnormalities? Ann Emerg Med. 1986; 15: 876–880.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

41. Callaham M, Schumaker H, Pentel P. Phenytoin prophylaxis of cardiotoxicity in experimental amitriptyline poisoning. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1988; 245: 216–220.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Citak A, Soysal DD, Ucsel R, Karabocuoglu M, Uzel N. Efficacy of long duration resuscitation and magnesium sulphate treatment in amitriptyline poisoning. Eur J Emerg Med. 2002; 9: 63–66.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

43. Knudsen K, Abrahamsson J. Effects of magnesium sulfate and lidocaine in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias in experimental amitriptyline poisoning in the rat. Crit Care Med. 1994; 22: 494–498.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

44. Kline JA, DeStefano AA, Schroeder JD, Raymond RM. Magnesium potentiates imipramine toxicity in the isolated rat heart. Ann Emerg Med. 1994; 24: 224–232.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

45. Gowda RM, Khan IA, Punukollu G, Vasavada BC, Sacchi TJ, Wilbur SL. Female preponderance in ibutilide-induced torsade de pointes. Int J Cardiol. 2004; 95: 219–222.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

46. Brown TC. Sodium bicarbonate treatment for tricyclic antidepressant arrhythmias in children. Med J Aust. 1976; 2: 380–382.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

47. Hoffman JR, Votey SR, Bayer M, Silver L. Effect of hypertonic sodium bicarbonate in the treatment of moderate-to-severe cyclic antidepressant overdose. Am J Emerg Med. 1993; 11: 336–341.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

48. McKinney PE, Rasmussen R. Reversal of severe tricyclic antidepressant-induced cardiotoxicity with intravenous hypertonic saline solution. Ann Emerg Med. 2003; 42: 20–24.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

49. Bailey PM, Little M, Jelinek GA, Wilce JA. Jellyfish envenoming syndromes: unknown toxic mechanisms and unproven therapies. Med J Aust. 2003; 178: 34–37.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

50. Proano L, Chiang WK, Wang RY. Calcium channel blocker overdose. Am J Emerg Med. 1995; 13: 444–450.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

51. Wenzel V, Lindner KH. Employing vasopressin during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and vasodilatory shock as a lifesaving vasopressor. Cardiovasc Res. 2001; 51: 529–541.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

52. Ramsay ID. Survival after imipramine poisoning. Lancet. 1967; 2: 1308–1309.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

53. Southall DP, Kilpatrick SM. Imipramine poisoning: survival of a child after prolonged cardiac massage. BMJ. 1974; 4: 508.

54. Kollef MH. Labetalol overdose successfully treated with amrinone and alpha-adrenergic receptor agonists. Chest. 1994; 105: 626–627.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

55. Burkhart KK. Intravenous propranolol reverses hypertension after sympathomimetic overdose: two case reports. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1992; 30: 109–114.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

56. Durward A, Guerguerian AM, Lefebvre M, Shemie SD. Massive diltiazem overdose treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2003; 4: 372–376.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

57. Holzer M, Sterz F, Schoerkhuber W, et al. Successful resuscitation of a verapamil-intoxicated patient with percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass. Crit Care Med. 1999; 27: 2818–2823.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]





This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
112/24_suppl/IV-126    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.105.166564v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow AHA Statements and Guidelines