(Circulation. 2005;112:148-150.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Editorial |
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and the David Geffen School of Medicine, University of CaliforniaLos Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif.
Correspondence to Peng-Sheng Chen, MD, Room 5342, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90048. E-mail chenp{at}cshs.org
Key Words: Editorials pacemakers arrhythmia death, sudden fibrillation
Arunaway pacemaker is a malfunctioning pacemaker that paces the heart at rapid rates. A report from Australia 30 years ago1 described a patient with runaway pacemaker that paced the ventricles at 280 bpm. The patient survived only because one of the coauthors alertly cut the pacemaker wires to disconnect the high-frequency focal source from the myocardium. In this issue of Circulation, Thomas et al2 report that they occasionally detected sustained high-frequency sources during ventricular fibrillation (VF) in sheep with myocardial infarction (MI). Specifically, in 3 of 12 hearts, they detected periodic high-frequency activations at 1.3% of the intramural electrodes sampled. The authors propose that these findings support the hypothesis3 that a relatively stable periodic source ("mother rotor"), with fibrillatory conduction block occurring in the remainder of the ventricle, may be the mechanism of VF in this model. This mother rotor mechanism of fibrillation contrasts with the multiple wavelet mechanism, in which all rotors are unstable and wavebreak is the engine driving fibrillation. Both mechanisms of fibrillation have been documented in various settings,4 but controversy exists over which is the most common in and clinically relevant to diseased human hearts. This issue has therapeutic implications because it has been suggested that ablation of the mother rotor may be a strategy to abolish VF. At the same time, ablation of the mother rotor may just allow the next-fastest daughter rotor to take its place because fibrillatory wavebreaks act as niduses for new rotors. In any case, however, to even test this intriguing therapeutic strategy, it is first necessary to identify the location of the mother rotor, which has been elusive to date, especially in large animals.5 The findings of the present study, in a large-animal diseased heart model, are therefore significant. They also raise important questions. For example, were mother rotors also present in the remaining 75% of hearts but undetected because of the limited area accessible to mapping? Or was the mechanism of fibrillation different in these hearts? Were the high-frequency focal sources that the authors detected really rotors that activate the ventricles in the form of scroll waves, or some other mechanism such as automatic foci or triggered activity?
See p 157
Winfree6 coined the term "rotor" to describe a source of rapid activation that creates a spiral wave in 2 dimensions and a scroll wave in 3 dimensions. Although a spiral or scroll wave has a large rotating wavefront, the actual source of activation is the rotor in the center. For a scroll wave to behave as a high-frequency focal source, it must stay in one place and have a long lifespan. A rotor is relatively stable in thin tissues,7 but electrically induced rotors usually have a short life span in normal canine ventricles in situ.8 In an attempt to detect sustained rotors in large animals, Rogers et al5 performed transmural mapping in 6 healthy anesthetized pigs using plunge electrodes inserted into the left ventricle. They found only sporadic and short-lived intramural reentry, although more sustained reentry (more than a few seconds) was seen on the epicardium in 3 of the 6 animals. The absence of sustained intramural rotors in large animals in situ seems to be inconsistent with the hypothesis that a relatively stable periodic source underlies the mechanisms of VF.
The thickness of the tissue is not the only factor that can affect rotor stability. Gray et al9 showed that a single rapidly meandering rotor in isolated rabbit ventricles could cause fibrillation through the Doppler effect. In their experiment, the rotor itself was stable and did not break up; however, because it was constantly meandering, the cycle length of activation in the remaining myocardium became variable, and hence the overall ECG resembled fibrillation rather than tachycardia. This meandering rotor scenario cannot be used to explain the results of the study by Thomas et al2 because the high-frequency focal source remained at the same site. Other factors that are important in maintaining rotor stability must be considered to explain the results of this study.
One possible explanation is that the electrophysiological and structural remodeling in chronic MI played a role in maintaining the rotor stability. Recent studies showed that the rotor stability is critically dependent on electrophysiological characteristics such as the excitability and the slope of action potential duration (APD) restitution and the preexisting structural heterogeneity of the ventricular tissues. Interaction between these dynamic factors and the preexisting structural heterogeneity determines the scroll wave phenotype.10 Wu et al11 showed that it is possible to convert multiple-wavelet (type 1) VF to sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) by flattening the APD restitution without changing the excitability. Adding sodium channel blockade to reduce the excitability can convert VT to slow (type 2), VF with a stationary mother rotor anchored to the papillary muscle.12 The latter study suggests that a combination of flattened APD restitution, low excitability, and the presence of an anatomic obstacle can promote the development of VF based on a mother rotor mechanism. Pak et al13 used ß-blockers to flatten APD restitution and reduce excitability, converting type 1 VF into type 2 VF, with a mother rotor anchored to the papillary muscle. Ablation of the papillary muscle may terminate VF in that model. It is possible that electrophysiological and structural remodeling associated with chronic MI might have stabilized the rotors and created the periodic sources in the study by Thomas et al. Without these changes (eg, in normal swine ventricles), a stable rotor cannot survive for long periods of time5; however, the location of the high-frequency sources in the Thomas et al study was distributed at multiple different locations in the ventricles. Because the authors did not perform histological examinations, it is unclear whether specific anatomic structure or heterogeneity is present at these high-frequency sites.
Although a mother rotor mechanism and sustained scroll waves are an attractive interpretation of the results of the present study, nonreentrant mechanisms such as a rapid automatic focus or triggered activity cannot be excluded. A number of studies have demonstrated that high-frequency nonreentrant focal sources can be causally related to the initiation of VF. For example, local injection of aconitine into the ventricle can induce rapid focal activation, with focal wavefronts originating from the site of injection in rapid succession.14 If the APD restitution is flat, then this focal activation continues as a source of monomorphic VT; however, if the restitution is steep, then VT-to-VF transition occurs. In the latter condition, the excision of the site of aconitine injection does not guarantee the termination of VF. Focal activations are also present in ventricular tachyarrhythmia in human patients. Pogwizd et al15 performed 3-dimensional intraoperative mapping in patients with healed MI and refractory VT. In addition to documenting intramural reentrant wavefronts, the authors also documented that focal (and presumably nonreentrant) activation may be responsible for the induction of VT. These findings suggest that nonreentrant mechanisms are present in diseased human ventricles and may serve as the initiating event in ventricular arrhythmias. Whether or not the focal activation triggers VT or VF depends on the electrophysiological and anatomic properties of the ventricles. The presence of a rapidly activating focus does not necessarily mean that this focus is essential for VF maintenance.
The coexistence of rapid focal discharges in the presence of disorganized activity in other parts of the myocardium also points to the possibility that reentrant mechanisms (rotors) and the nonreentrant mechanism may work together to maintain VF. The nonreentrant mechanisms (automaticity or triggered activity) depend critically on intracellular Ca (Cai) dynamics. In cardiac muscle, depolarization triggers entry of extracellular Ca through voltage-gated Ca channels, which in turn triggers the release of stored Ca in the sarcoplasmic reticulum. Relaxation occurs when Ca is taken up by the sarcoplasmic reticulum and extruded by the Na-Ca exchanger. Although Ca channel opening and Ca-induced Ca release are normally triggered by the action potential, Cai cycling can also exhibit its own dynamics. It is possible that the rapid activation rate during VF induces Cai overload and facilitates spontaneous Ca release,16 which in turn causes afterdepolarizations and triggered activity.17 The triggered activity may manifest as high-frequency periodic focal activity recorded by extracellular electrodes. This high-frequency focal activity in turn increases the number of activation wavefronts through fibrillatory conduction and helps to maintain a high rate of activation, which in turn exacerbates Cai overload. In this scenario, the reentrant and nonreentrant mechanisms work together to promote VF.
The development of both reentrant and nonreentrant mechanisms may be facilitated by sympathetic stimulation. Hearts with more sympathetic nerve terminals may respond more vigorously to the sympathetic discharges than do normal hearts. Although the sympathetic nerve terminals were not examined in the present study, it is reasonable to hypothesize that significant neural remodeling has occurred in these infarcted hearts.18 After division, crushing, interference of blood supply, or other means of injury to a nerve, peripheral nerves undergo degeneration, which may be followed by neurilemma cell proliferation and axonal regeneration. The regeneration effort is triggered by the reexpression of nerve growth factor or other neurotrophic factor genes in the non-neuronal cells around the site of injury. Because nerves in the heart may be injured during myocardial ischemia, nerve growth factor overexpression also occurs after MI, resulting in nerve sprouting and sympathetic hyperinnervation.19 A potential benefit of the increased sympathetic innervation is the improved hemodynamic performance that compensates for the myocardium lost during infarction; however, the increased sympathetic innervation also allows the nerve terminals to release more catecholamines during sympathetic discharges. VF induces hypotension, which is a potent trigger of sympathetic activation. An increased catecholamine release into the myocardium enhances automaticity and increases the propensity for triggered activity, more so in hearts with MI and nerve sprouting than in normal hearts. This mechanism may partially explain the different observations made in chronic infarcted ventricles and in normal swine hearts.
In summary, Thomas et al have detected regions of high-frequency activations during VF in dogs with chronic MI. These high-frequency periodic discharges may act as runaway biological pacemakers that underlie the mechanisms of VF. If a runaway biological pacemaker underlies VF, is it possible that cutting the pacemaker wires and/or removing the pacemaker itself could both terminate VF and prevent its recurrence, or would a marginally slower ancillary pacemaker replace it? There is already clinical and experimental evidence showing that some types of VF can be cured by radiofrequency ablation of a focal source of rapid activation.13,20 Whether this is generally true for VF in the setting of common forms of heart disease remains to be investigated. The study by Thomas et al takes an important step toward testing this hypothesis in a clinically relevant model of ischemic heart disease. Even though a putative mother rotor was identified only in a minority of the hearts studied, its maternal influence on VF can now be tested.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Disclosure
Dr Chen has received equipment from pacemaker companies (including Medtronic, Guidant, and St. Jude) to support research in animals.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Thomas SP, Thiagalingam A, Wallace E, Kovoor P, Ross DL. Organization of myocardial activation during ventricular fibrillation after myocardial infarction: evidence for sustained high-frequency sources. Circulation. 2005; 112: 157163.
3. Jalife J. Ventricular fibrillation: mechanisms of initiation and maintenance. Annu Rev Physiol. 2000; 62: 2550.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Rogers JM, Ideker RE. Fibrillating myocardium: rabbit warren or beehive? Circ Res. 2000; 86: 369370.
5. Rogers JM, Huang J, Melnick SB, Ideker RE. Sustained reentry in the left ventricle of fibrillating pig hearts. Circ Res. 2003; 92: 539545.
6. Winfree AT. Electrical turbulence in three-dimensional heart muscle. Science. 1994; 266: 10031006.
7. Pertsov AM, Davidenko JM, Salomonsz R, Baxter WT, Jalife J. Spiral waves of excitation underlie reentrant activity in isolated cardiac muscle. Circ Res. 1993; 72: 631650.
8. Cha YM, Birgersdotter-Green U, Wolf PL, Peters BB, Chen PS. The mechanism of termination of reentrant activity in ventricular fibrillation. Circ Res. 1994; 74: 495506.
9. Gray RA, Jalife J, Panfilov AV, Baxter WT, Cabo C, Davidenko JM, Pertsov AM, Hogeweg P. Mechanisms of cardiac fibrillation. Science. 1995; 270: 12221223.
10. Weiss JN, Chen PS, Qu Z, Karagueuzian HS, Lin SF, Garfinkel A. Electrical restitution and cardiac fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002; 13: 292295.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Wu TJ, Lin SF, Weiss JN, Ting CT, Chen PS. Two types of ventricular fibrillation in isolated rabbit hearts: importance of excitability and action potential duration restitution. Circulation. 2002; 106: 18591866.
12. Wu TJ, Lin SF, Baher A, Qu Z, Garfinkel A, Weiss JN, Ting CT, Chen PS. Mother rotors and the mechanisms of D600-induced type 2 ventricular fibrillation. Circulation. 2004; 110: 21102118.
13. Pak HN, Oh YS, Liu YB, Wu TJ, Karagueuzian HS, Lin SF, Chen PS. Catheter ablation of ventricular fibrillation in rabbit ventricles treated with beta-blockers. Circulation. 2003; 108: 31493156.
14. Swissa M, Qu Z, Ohara T, Lee M-H, Lin SF, Garfinkel A, Karagueuzian HS, Weiss JN, Chen PS. Action potential duration restitution and ventricular fibrillation due to rapid focal excitation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002; 282: H1915H1923.
15. Pogwizd SM, Hoyt RH, Saffitz JE, Corr PB, Cox JL, Cain ME. Reentrant and focal mechanisms underlying ventricular tachycardia in the human heart. Circulation. 1992; 86: 18721887.
16. Omichi C, Lamp ST, Lin SF, Yang J, Baher A, Zhou S, Attin M, Lee MH, Karagueuzian HS, Kogan B, Qu Z, Garfinkel A, Chen PS, Weiss JN. Intracellular Ca dynamics in ventricular fibrillation. Am J Physiol. 2004; 286: H1836H1844.
17. Choi BR, Burton F, Salama G. Cytosolic Ca2+ triggers early afterdepolarizations and Torsade de Pointes in rabbit hearts with type 2 long QT syndrome. J Physiol. 2002; 543: 615631.
18. Vracko R, Thorning D, Frederickson RG. Fate of nerve fibers in necrotic, healing, and healed rat myocardium. Lab Invest. 1990; 63: 490501.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Zhou S, Chen LS, Miyauchi Y, Miyauchi M, Kar S, Kangavari S, Fishbein MC, Sharifi B, Chen PS. Mechanisms of cardiac nerve sprouting after myocardial infarction in dogs. CircRes. 2004; 95: 7683.
20. Haissaguerre M, Shoda M, Jais P, Nogami A, Shah DC, Kautzner J, Arentz T, Kalushe D, Lamaison D, Griffith M, Cruz F, de Paola A, Gaita F, Hocini M, Garrigue S, Macle L, Weerasooriya R, Clementy J. Mapping and ablation of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. Circulation. 2002; 106: 962967.
Related Article:
Circulation 2005 112: 157-163.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. W. Kay, G. P. Walcott, J. D. Gladden, S. B. Melnick, and J. M. Rogers Lifetimes of epicardial rotors in panoramic optical maps of fibrillating swine ventricles Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2006; 291(4): H1935 - H1941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |