Published online before print September 6, 2005, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.552216
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2005;112:1573-1579.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Heart Failure |
N-Terminal Pro–Brain Natriuretic Peptide or Troponin Testing Followed by Echocardiography for Risk Stratification of Acute Pulmonary Embolism
From the Departments of Clinical Chemistry (L.B.) and Cardiology and Pulmonary Medicine (B.P., B.K., C.R., S.K.), Georg August University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany; and the Departments of Biostatistics (M.O.) and Cardiology and Angiology (A.G.), Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Correspondence to Stavros Konstantinides, MD, Department of Cardiology and Pulmonary Medicine, Georg August University of Goettingen, Robert Koch Strasse 40, D-37099 Goettingen, Germany. E-mail skonstan{at}med.uni-goettingen.de
Received March 28, 2005; revision received May 13, 2005; accepted May 17, 2005.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Background— Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal (NT)-proBNP have recently emerged as promising parameters for risk assessment in acute pulmonary embolism (PE). However, their positive predictive value is low, and the prognostic implications of NT-proBNP or troponin elevation alone are questionable.
Methods and Results— To determine whether the combination of NT-proBNP testing with echocardiography may identify both low-risk and high-risk patients with PE, we examined 124 consecutive patients with proved PE. All underwent echocardiography on admission to detect right ventricular dysfunction. NT-proBNP and troponin concentrations were measured in one core laboratory. The primary end point was death or major in-hospital complications. The cutoff level of 1000 pg/mL had a high negative predictive value (95% for a complicated course, 100% for death), but NT-proBNP 
1000 pg/mL did not independently predict an adverse outcome. Combination of NT-proBNP testing with echocardiography identified 3 major risk groups. A positive echocardiogram was associated with a 12-fold elevation in complication risk compared with patients with low NT-proBNP (P=0.002), whereas NT-proBNP elevation without right ventricular dysfunction on echocardiography only slightly increased the risk of an adverse outcome (P=0.17). The combination of cardiac troponin testing with echocardiography yielded similar complication rates in the lowest-risk group and a similar magnitude of risk elevation for the highest-risk patients, but it also increased the number of intermediate-risk groups.
Conclusions— Our results support a simple risk stratification algorithm for patients with PE, with the use of NT-proBNP or troponin testing as an initial step that should be followed by echocardiography if elevated levels of the biomarker are found.
Key Words: echocardiography • embolism • natriuretic peptides • prognosis • pulmonary heart disease
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Contemporary risk assessment strategies in acute pulmonary embolism (PE) concentrate on identification of patients who appear stable at presentation but have impending right ventricular failure and a high death risk. The aim is to better define potential candidates for thrombolytic therapy and help design future therapeutic trials.1,2 To date, bedside echocardiography is the best established method for the detection of right ventricular dysfunction in acute PE,3 and the prognostic relevance of echocardiographic findings has been demonstrated in a number of studies, including 2 large registries.4–6 More recently, reconstructed 4-chamber views of the heart on chest CT also were reported to detect right ventricular enlargement due to PE and predict early death.7 However, it appears impractical to demand imaging studies for risk stratification of every patient with acute PE, particularly when the logistic requirements and the substantial financial burden that such a strategy might impose on many institutions are considered.
See p 1520
Cardiac biomarkers have recently emerged as promising, relatively simple prognostic indicators in patients with acute PE. For example, we8 and others9–11 showed that cardiac troponins I and T are associated with right ventricular dysfunction on echocardiography and that absence of cardiac troponin elevation at presentation predicts a favorable in-hospital outcome. More recently, some reports suggested that brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal (NT)-proBNP levels may have an even higher negative predictive value (approaching 100%) with regard to early death, which makes them particularly useful for ruling out severe, life-threatening PE.12–15 On the other hand, the positive predictive value of NT-proBNP was low in previous studies, and the prognostic implications of elevated natriuretic peptide levels alone remain uncertain.16 Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate whether the combination of NT-proBNP testing with an imaging modality such as echocardiography may increase the prognostic value of either diagnostic method alone and help define low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups of patients with acute PE. Furthermore, we compared NT-proBNP with troponin testing to determine which one of the 2 biomarkers could be more appropriate to form (together with echocardiography) the basis of a reliable and simple risk stratification algorithm.
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Patient Population and Study Design
The study was conducted in 2 collaborating university hospitals and prospectively included a total of 124 consecutive patients (74 women, 50 men; mean age, 60±18 years) with proved acute PE over a 45-month period. In accordance with standard diagnostic algorithms followed in both institutions,8 patients presenting with an intermediate or high clinical probability of venous thromboembolism17 and a positive D-dimer ELISA test (>500 µg/L) underwent sonographic examination of the leg veins, ventilation-perfusion lung scan, contrast-enhanced chest CT scan, or (in rare cases) conventional pulmonary angiography, alone or in combination, to confirm (or exclude) the presence of venous thrombosis and acute PE. In patients whose clinical condition was considered too critical to permit transportation from the emergency department or intensive care unit, acute massive PE was diagnosed by bedside transthoracic echocardiography indicating pulmonary hypertension and/or acute right ventricular pressure overload in the absence of left ventricular or mitral valve disease. The echocardiographic criteria of acute right ventricular dysfunction due to major PE have been described previously.8 Briefly, right ventricular dysfunction was defined as dilatation of the right ventricle (end-diastolic diameter >30 mm from the parasternal view or the right ventricle appearing larger than the left ventricle from the subcostal or apical view) combined with right atrial hypertension, ie, absence of inspiratory collapse of the inferior vena cava. The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee in each institution, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Complete information on baseline parameters as well as the patients’ treatment and in-hospital course was obtained by means of a standardized protocol. The study design was observational and did not interfere with further diagnostic workup, nor did it influence the therapeutic decisions. The clinicians were unaware of the patients’ biomarker levels throughout the hospital stay.
NT-proBNP and Cardiac Troponin Testing
Blood samples were obtained on admission as well as 4, 8, and 24 hours thereafter, and serum was stored at –20°C or colder at the enrolling site before being sent to the Department of Clinical Chemistry of the University of Goettingen, where samples were stored at –80°C. Samples were later analyzed in batches after a single thaw. The investigator responsible for the measurements was unaware of the patients’ baseline parameters or clinical course. NT-proBNP and cardiac troponin T were determined with the use of a quantitative electrochemiluminescence assay (Elecsys 2010 analyzer, Roche Diagnostics). For cardiac troponin T, the manufacturer reported reference values <0.04 ng/mL. For NT-proBNP, the prognostically relevant cutoff value was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis as described below. Cardiac troponin I was determined on an ADVIA Centaur Analyzer (Bayer Vital GmbH) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Reported values in normal healthy adults are <0.07 ng/mL.
Statistical Analysis
The predetermined primary end point of the study was complicated in-hospital course, defined as death or at least 1 of the following8: (1) secondary (emergency) thrombolytic treatment; (2) need for catecholamine support of blood pressure (except for dopamine at the rate of 
5 µg/kg per minute) to maintain adequate tissue perfusion and prevent or treat cardiogenic shock; (3) endotracheal intubation; or (4) cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The secondary end point was overall mortality. The prognostic relevance of the baseline parameters listed in Table 1 as well as gender and NT-proBNP was first analyzed univariately by the 
2 test. ROC analysis was performed to determine the optimal NT-proBNP cutoff level with regard to prognosis. Subsequently, a multiple logistic regression model was applied to the primary combined end point, taking into account those variables that reached a probability value of <0.20 in the univariate comparison. In addition, to evaluate the role of a strategy combining cardiac biomarkers with echocardiography for risk stratification of PE, multiple logistic regression analysis compared the complication risk of 3 patient groups defined by the combination of NT-proBNP and echocardiography and of 4 groups defined by troponin T testing plus echocardiography. No adjustments for other baseline parameters were made in this latter model. The results are presented as estimated odds ratios (ORs) with the corresponding 95% CIs. All reported probability values are 2 sided.
|
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Baseline Parameters: Correlation With Clinical Outcome
The patients’ clinical symptoms, predisposing conditions, and relevant findings at presentation are shown in Table 1. Overall, 108 patients (87%) presented with dyspnea, and 64 patients (52%) reported an acute symptom onset. Hemodynamic instability, ie, persistent hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg or a fall in systolic blood pressure of >40 mm Hg for at least 15 minutes), cardiogenic shock, or need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation because of massive PE was present in 9 patients (7%). Importantly, none of our patients was found to have severe preexisting left ventricular dysfunction as indicated by a left ventricular ejection fraction
30% on echocardiography.18 After clinical and echocardiographic examination, venous thromboembolism was confirmed by leg vein ultrasound imaging in 51 patients (41%), by lung scan in 93 (75%), by spiral CT scan in 27 (22%), and by pulmonary angiography in 3 patients (2.4%), alone or in combination. In 5 patients (4%), none of these procedures could be performed because of extreme hemodynamic instability, and thus PE was diagnosed on the basis of clinical and echocardiographic criteria alone, as described in Methods. Table 2 shows the incidence of in-hospital clinical events in the study population. Of the clinical baseline parameters listed in Table 1, only hemodynamic instability at presentation was significantly associated with a complicated course by univariate analysis. The frequency of the combined end point was 89% in initially unstable patients compared with 11% in stable patients (P=0.001). In accordance with previous reports,5,8 an adverse outcome also was more frequent in patients with echocardiographic evidence of right ventricular dysfunction (37% versus 7%; P=0.001), as it was in patients with elevated cardiac troponin T or I levels (26% versus 10% and 33% versus 7%, respectively; P=0.027 for troponin T and P=0.001 for troponin I).
|
NT-proBNP for Ruling out an Adverse Outcome in PE
Maximal NT-proBNP levels over the first 24 hours after admission varied widely in the patient population, ranging between 10 and 64 120 pg/mL. In agreement with previous studies,19,20 we found higher NT-proBNP levels in women as opposed to men (median, 1797 versus 702 pg/mL; Figure 1). However, no gender-specific differences were observed with regard to the patients’ outcome (incidence of the primary end point, 18% in men versus 15% in women; P=0.65).
|
The median NT-proBNP concentration was 7176 pg/mL in patients with an adverse clinical outcome as opposed to 864 pg/mL in those with an uncomplicated course (P=0.002). There was a moderate correlation between NT-proBNP and cardiac troponin T levels (r=0.56; P<0.001). ROC analysis (Figure 2) identified a concentration of 1000 pg/mL as a cutoff level for predicting death or major complications in the population of the present study. NT-proBNP levels 1000 pg/mL, which were found in 54% of our patients, were significantly associated with the presence of right ventricular dysfunction on echocardiography (P=0.001; Figure 3A) and predicted, by univariate analysis, both a higher overall mortality (10% compared with 0% in patients with NT-proBNP <1000 pg/mL; P=0.012) and a higher incidence of the primary end point (25% versus 5.3%; P=0.002; Figure 3B). Overall, the negative predictive value of NT-proBNP (with the use of the above cutoff point) was 95% for the combined end point and 100% for in-hospital death. On the other hand, the positive predictive value of the biomarker was low (25% for the combined end point; only 10% for death), and multiple logistic regression that included baseline clinical, echocardiographic, and laboratory characteristics (as stated in Methods) demonstrated that hemodynamic instability at presentation (OR, 33.6; 95% CI, 3.05 to 370.2; P=0.004) but not NT-proBNP 1000 pg/mL (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 0.29 to 11.29; P=0.52), cardiac troponin T 0.04 ng/mL (OR, 3.23; 95% CI, 0.79 to 13.22; P=0.10), or echocardiographic evidence of right ventricular dysfunction (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.36 to 6.21; P=0.58) independently predicted an adverse outcome in the whole patient population.
|
|
NT-proBNP or Cardiac Troponin T Combined With Echocardiography for Risk Assessment in PE
The results presented above suggested that NT-proBNP levels alone are capable of ruling out an unfavorable outcome in acute PE, but they are not, by themselves, independent predictors of death or major complications. We therefore tested a strategy combining cardiac biomarker levels with an imaging modality (echocardiography) to define low-, moderate-, and high-risk patient groups. High (1000 pg/mL) NT-proBNP levels without echocardiographic evidence of right ventricular dysfunction were a rather frequent finding in our study (37 of 124 patients; 30%), whereas, on the other hand, an enlarged (dysfunctional) right ventricle on the echocardiogram was very rarely (3 patients; 2.4% of the study population) encountered in the absence of NT-proBNP elevation. This fact allowed us to define 3 major patient groups: (1) patients with low NT-proBNP levels (reference group; n=44); (2) patients with high NT-proBNP and a negative echocardiogram (n=37); and (3) patients with a positive echocardiogram (n=30). As shown in Figure 4A, complication rates (primary end point) in these 3 groups were 4.6%, 13.5%, and 36.7%, respectively, and mortality rates were 0%, 0%, and 16.7%, respectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis (shown in Table 3) revealed that a positive echo was associated with a 12-fold elevated risk of an adverse outcome in the acute phase of PE (P=0.002), whereas in the presence of NT-proBNP elevation alone, the risk was slightly but not significantly higher than that in the reference group.
|
|
We also investigated whether the combination of cardiac troponin with echocardiography might offer any advantages compared with the aforementioned strategy with regard to risk stratification of acute PE. In this case, 4 patient groups had to be defined: (1) no troponin T elevation and negative echocardiogram (reference group; n=53); (2) troponin elevation and negative echocardiogram (n=22); (3) no troponin elevation but positive echocardiogram (n=12); and (4) troponin elevation combined with a positive echocardiogram (n=16). As shown in Figure 4B, mortality and complication rates in the first (lowest-risk) group were comparable to those in patients with low NT-proBNP levels (Figure 4A). Moreover, the incidence of the primary end point in the fourth (highest-risk) group was comparable to that of patients with high NT-proBNP and a positive echocardiogram (Figure 4B versus 4A), and the elevation of the complication risk compared with the reference group was also of similar magnitude (10- versus 12-fold; Table 3). Overall, combination of troponin T with echocardiography increased the number of patient groups from 3 to 4 without offering any additional advantages in the intermediate-risk category (Table 3).
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Acute pressure overload and failure of the right ventricle is a critical event in the pathophysiology of PE.2,21 Patients presenting with overt right heart failure and hemodynamic instability are known to have a high mortality rate in the acute phase of the disease,5 and there is consensus that emergency thrombolytic, interventional, or surgical therapy is warranted to save their lives.22,23 On the other hand, the appropriate management of patients with so-called submassive PE, ie, those with beginning right ventricular dysfunction but apparent hemodynamic stability at presentation, remains controversial to date.24,25 Moreover, and importantly, a simple and reliable method (or algorithm) for confirmation or exclusion of right ventricular dysfunction in stable patients with diagnosed PE remains to be defined and confirmed by clinical data.16 The results of the present study confirm previous reports by showing that low NT-proBNP levels possess a high negative predictive value, thus making NT-proBNP testing particularly useful for ruling out an adverse in-hospital outcome in PE.12,14 However, the main finding of our study is that combination of a simple laboratory test, ie, measurement of the levels of the cardiac biomarker NT-proBNP, with a noninvasive imaging method such as echocardiography at the bedside, may permit the identification of both low-risk and high-risk patients with acute PE.
Being released as a result of cardiomyocyte stretch, brain natriuretic peptides are sensitive indicators of neurohormonal activation resulting from ventricular dysfunction.18,26 The biologically active C-terminal peptide 77-108 (BNP) and the inactive N-terminal fragment 1-76 (NT-proBNP) are both detectable in human plasma. However, NT-proBNP levels may have, at least theoretically, enhanced ability to assess the severity of heart failure because they exhibit more pronounced increments compared with BNP.27 Recently, the prognostic value of BNP13,15,28,29 and NT-proBNP12,14 was examined in patients with acute PE in an attempt to detect right ventricular dysfunction. For NT-proBNP, plasma concentrations <500 to 600 pg/mL were reported to predict a benign clinical course.12,14 In our population of 124 patients, ROC analysis identified a higher concentration, namely, 1000 pg/mL, as an appropriate cutoff value. Patients with NT-proBNP levels <1000 pg/mL could reliably be identified as a low-risk group, as indicated by the high negative predictive value for in-hospital death and the combined primary end point "complicated clinical course" (100% and 95%, respectively). Possible explanations for the differences between our calculated cutoff value and those proposed by other investigators may include the relatively small sample size of previous studies and differences in the demographic characteristics of the patients included.
In agreement with previous studies,12,14 our univariate analysis suggested that elevated NT-proBNP levels, which were found in as many as 54% of the study patients, were associated with an increased complication rate. Importantly, however, concentrations above the cutoff value did not independently predict (rule in) an adverse outcome when adjusted for clinical and echocardiographic baseline parameters. This latter finding appeared consistent with the (proposed but not tested) hypothesis that NT-proBNP testing might need to be combined with echocardiography to also identify the high-risk patients with PE.16 Further analysis confirmed that patients with a positive echocardiogram (showing a dysfunctional right ventricle) had a >12-fold elevated risk of an adverse outcome compared with those with low NT-proBNP values. These patients had a complication rate of 37% and a death rate of 17% during the acute phase of PE. Therefore, because a positive echocardiogram was rarely encountered (incidence 3%) in the absence of NT-proBNP elevation in our patient population and in a previous study,12 our results support a simple and practical risk stratification algorithm for patients with proved PE. This algorithm could use NT-proBNP testing as an initial step, to be followed by echocardiography only if elevated levels of the biomarker are found.
Our results indicate that reliable risk stratification of PE is also possible combining troponin T, another cardiac biomarker, with echocardiography. This finding is in accordance with a previous report that demonstrated the incremental prognostic value of troponin I and echocardiography in this setting.30 In our study, comparison of the 2 strategies (ie, with the use of troponin T versus NT-proBNP as the initial step) revealed similar complication rates in the lowest-risk groups and a similar magnitude of risk elevation for the highest-risk patients. It can be argued that combination of troponin T (instead of NT-proBNP) with echocardiography increases the number of intermediate-risk groups, thus complicating the proposed algorithm without providing additional prognostic information. Moreover, because a positive echocardiogram was frequent even in the absence of troponin elevation, our study suggests that, in contrast to NT-proBNP, troponin testing always needs to be accompanied by echocardiography in patients with proved PE. On the other hand, the predefined reference values for cardiac troponins8 appear to offer an advantage (better standardization) compared with NT-proBNP cutoff values that, as mentioned above, were defined post hoc and varied in different studies. This fact emphasizes the need for prospective validation of risk stratification algorithms based on predefined reference concentrations of NT-proBNP.
Elevation of natriuretic peptides is often considered a "nonspecific" finding because it may be associated with a multitude of possible risk factors, including preexisting left ventricular dysfunction, patient age, renal impairment, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, and chronic lung disease with cor pulmonale.18,31,32 In our study at least, none of the patients was found to have severe preexisting left ventricular dysfunction as indicated by a left ventricular ejection fraction 30% on echocardiography.18 Furthermore, it has been argued that this "nonspecificity" may exactly be what makes natriuretic peptides such powerful prognostic parameters because they may reflect a sum or an integral of various risk markers.33 Finally, for reasons that remain to be defined, NT-proBNP levels are higher in women than in men.20 This finding was confirmed in our study population with acute PE, in which the median values in women were more than twice as high as those in men. However, the implications of these differences are unclear, and we found no significant effects of gender on the risk of death or major complications in the acute phase of PE.
In conclusion, the results of the present study demonstrate that NT-proBNP or troponin testing combined with echocardiography may reliably identify both low-risk and high-risk patients with PE. Apart from proposing a simple risk stratification algorithm for use in clinical practice, these findings could provide the background for larger triage studies integrating NT-proBNP or troponins into the management of acute PE and, more specifically, testing the possible benefits of early thrombolysis in the high-risk patient group.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
The authors are grateful to Sebastian Jaeckle, MD, for his help with collecting and handling the serum probes at the University of Freiburg.
Disclosure
Roche Pharmaceuticals has provided NT-proBNP test kits and modest financial research support to Dr Pieske and the University of Goettingen.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1. Goldhaber SZ. Pulmonary embolism. Lancet. 2004; 363: 1295–1305.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Konstantinides S, Kasper W. Pulmonary embolism. In: Crawford MH, DiMarco JP, Paulus WJ, eds. Cardiology. London, UK: Mosby International; 2004: 1027–1036.
3. Goldhaber SZ. Echocardiography in the management of pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 136: 691–700.
4. Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, De Rosa M. Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER). Lancet. 1999; 353: 1386–1389.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Kasper W, Konstantinides S, Geibel A, Olschewski M, Heinrich F, Grosser KD, Rauber K, Iversen S, Redecker M, Kienast J. Management strategies and determinants of outcome in acute major pulmonary embolism: results of a multicenter registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 30: 1165–1171.[Abstract]
6. Konstantinides S, Geibel A, Olschewski M, Heinrich F, Grosser K, Rauber K, Iversen S, Redecker M, Kienast J, Just H, Kasper W. Association between thrombolytic treatment and the prognosis of hemodynamically stable patients with major pulmonary embolism: results of a multicenter registry. Circulation. 1997; 96: 882–888.
7. Schoepf UJ, Kucher N, Kipfmueller F, Quiroz R, Costello P, Goldhaber SZ. Right ventricular enlargement on chest computed tomography: a predictor of early death in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation. 2004; 110: 3276–3280.
8. Konstantinides S, Geibel A, Olschewski M, Kasper W, Hruska N, Jackle S, Binder L. Importance of cardiac troponins I and T in risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation. 2002; 106: 1263–1268.
9. Janata K, Holzer M, Laggner AN, Mullner M. Cardiac troponin T in the severity assessment of patients with pulmonary embolism: cohort study. BMJ. 2003; 326: 312–313.
10. Pruszczyk P, Bochowicz A, Torbicki A, Szulc M, Kurzyna M, Fijalkowska A, Kuch-Wocial A. Cardiac troponin T monitoring identifies high-risk group of normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Chest. 2003; 123: 1947–1952.
11. Giannitsis E, Muller-Bardorff M, Kurowski V, Weidtmann B, Wiegand U, Kampmann M, Katus HA. Independent prognostic value of cardiac troponin T in patients with confirmed pulmonary embolism. Circulation. 2000; 102: 211–217.
12. Kucher N, Printzen G, Doernhoefer T, Windecker S, Meier B, Hess OM. Low pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels predict benign clinical outcome in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation. 2003; 107: 1576–1578.
13. Kucher N, Printzen G, Goldhaber SZ. Prognostic role of brain natriuretic peptide in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation. 2003; 107: 2545–2547.
14. Pruszczyk P, Kostrubiec M, Bochowicz A, Styczynski G, Szulc M, Kurzyna M, Fijalkowska A, Kuch-Wocial A, Chlewicka I, Torbicki A. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Respir J. 2003; 22: 649–653.
15. ten Wolde M, Tulevski II, Mulder JW, Sohne M, Boomsma F, Mulder BJ, Buller HR. Brain natriuretic peptide as a predictor of adverse outcome in patients with pulmonary embolism. Circulation. 2003; 107: 2082–2084.
16. Kucher N, Goldhaber SZ. Cardiac biomarkers for risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation. 2003; 108: 2191–2194.
17. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Forgie M, Kearon C, Dreyer J, Kovacs G, Mitchell M, Lewandowski B, Kovacs MJ. Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349: 1227–1235.
18. McDonagh TA, Robb SD, Murdoch DR, Morton JJ, Ford I, Morrison CE, Tunstall-Pedoe H, McMurray JJ, Dargie HJ. Biochemical detection of left-ventricular systolic dysfunction. Lancet. 1998; 351: 9–13.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Luchner A, Hengstenberg C, Lowel H, Trawinski J, Baumann M, Riegger GA, Schunkert H, Holmer S. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide after myocardial infarction: a marker of cardio-renal function. Hypertension. 2002; 39: 99–104.
20. Johnston N, Jernberg T, Lindahl B, Lindback J, Stridsberg M, Larsson A, Venge P, Wallentin L. Biochemical indicators of cardiac and renal function in a healthy elderly population. Clin Biochem. 2004; 37: 210–216.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Goldhaber SZ. Thrombolysis for pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 1131–1132.
22. Task Force on Pulmonary Embolism, European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines on diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J. 2000; 21: 1301–1336.
23. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Thorax. 2003; 58: 470–483.
24. Dalen JE. Thrombolysis in submassive pulmonary embolism? No. J Thromb Haemost. 2003; 1: 1130–1132.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Konstantinides S. Thrombolysis in submassive pulmonary embolism? Yes. J Thromb Haemost. 2003; 1: 1127–1129.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Mukoyama M, Nakao K, Hosoda K, Suga S, Saito Y, Ogawa Y, Shirakami G, Jougasaki M, Obata K, Yasue H. Brain natriuretic peptide as a novel cardiac hormone in humans: evidence for an exquisite dual natriuretic peptide system, atrial natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic peptide. J Clin Invest. 1991; 87: 1402–1412.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Richards AM, Nicholls MG, Yandle TG, Frampton C, Espiner EA, Turner JG, Buttimore RC, Lainchbury JG, Elliott JM, Ikram H, Crozier IG, Smyth DW. Plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and adrenomedullin: new neurohormonal predictors of left ventricular function and prognosis after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998; 97: 1921–1929.
28. Krüger S, Graf J, Merx MW, Koch KC, Kunz D, Hanrath P, Janssens U. Brain natriuretic peptide predicts right heart failure in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Am Heart J. 2004; 147: 60–65.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Tulevski II, Hirsch A, Sanson BJ, Romkes H, van der Wall EE, van Veldhuisen DJ, Buller HR, Mulder BJ. Increased brain natriuretic peptide as a marker for right ventricular dysfunction in acute pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost. 2001; 86: 1193–1196.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Kucher N, Wallmann D, Carone A, Windecker S, Meier B, Hess OM. Incremental prognostic value of troponin I and echocardiography in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J. 2003; 24: 1651–1656.
31. Bando M, Ishii Y, Sugiyama Y, Kitamura S. Elevated plasma brain natriuretic peptide levels in chronic respiratory failure with cor pulmonale. Respir Med. 1999; 93: 507–514.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Nagaya N, Nishikimi T, Okano Y, Uematsu M, Satoh T, Kyotani S, Kuribayashi S, Hamada S, Kakishita M, Nakanishi N, Takamiya M, Kunieda T, Matsuo H, Kangawa K. Plasma brain natriuretic peptide levels increase in proportion to the extent of right ventricular dysfunction in pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 31: 202–208.
33. Omland T, Persson A, Ng L, O’Brien R, Karlsson T, Herlitz J, Hartford M, Caidahl K. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and long-term mortality in acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2002; 106: 2913–2918.
Related Article:
Circulation 2005 112: 1520-1521.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  D. Jimenez, F. Uresandi, R. Otero, J. L. Lobo, M. Monreal, D. Marti, J. Zamora, A. Muriel, D. Aujesky, and R. D. Yusen Troponin-Based Risk Stratification of Patients With Acute Nonmassive Pulmonary Embolism: Systematic Review and Metaanalysis Chest, October 1, 2009; 136(4): 974 - 982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J-C Lega, Y Lacasse, L Lakhal, and S Provencher Natriuretic peptides and troponins in pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis Thorax, October 1, 2009; 64(10): 869 - 875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Ray, S. Delerme, P. Jourdain, and C. Chenevier-Gobeaux Differential diagnosis of acute dyspnea: the value of B natriuretic peptides in the emergency department QJM, November 1, 2008; 101(11): 831 - 843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Proudfoot, D. Melley, and P. L Shah Role of thrombolysis in haemodynamically stable patients with pulmonary embolism Thorax, October 1, 2008; 63(10): 853 - 854. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Authors/Task Force Members, A. Torbicki, A. Perrier, S. Konstantinides, G. Agnelli, N. Galie, P. Pruszczyk, F. Bengel, A. J.B. Brady, D. Ferreira, et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2008; 29(18): 2276 - 2315. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. A. Klok, I. C. M. Mos, and M. V. Huisman Brain-Type Natriuretic Peptide Levels in the Prediction of Adverse Outcome in Patients with Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 15, 2008; 178(4): 425 - 430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Lankeit, T. Kempf, C. Dellas, M. Cuny, H. Tapken, T. Peter, M. Olschewski, S. Konstantinides, and K. C. Wollert Growth Differentiation Factor-15 for Prognostic Assessment of Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 1, 2008; 177(9): 1018 - 1025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Stoodley, M. Cooper, and L. Thomas Acute pulmonary embolus in pregnancy: a case study highlighting the value of TTE Eur J Echocardiogr, May 1, 2008; 9(3): 406 - 409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Jimenez, G. Diaz, J. Molina, D. Marti, J. Del Rey, S. Garcia-Rull, C. Escobar, R. Vidal, A. Sueiro, and R. D. Yusen Troponin I and risk stratification of patients with acute nonmassive pulmonary embolism Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2008; 31(4): 847 - 853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Lancellotti, B. Cosyns, and L. A. Pierard Dynamic left ventricular dyssynchrony contributes to B-type natriuretic peptide release during exercise in patients with systolic heart failure Europace, April 1, 2008; 10(4): 496 - 501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. T. Lu, T. Cai, H. Ersoy, A. G. Whitmore, R. Quiroz, S. Z. Goldhaber, and F. J. Rybicki Interval Increase in Right-Left Ventricular Diameter Ratios at CT as a Predictor of 30-day Mortality after Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Initial Experience Radiology, January 1, 2008; 246(1): 281 - 287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J.G. Coghlan and J. Davar How should we assess right ventricular function in 2008? Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2007; 9(suppl_H): H22 - H28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Palmieri, E. A. Palmieri, and A. Celentano Functional limitation and right ventricular dysfunction at 6-month follow-up in patients with non-massive pulmonary embolism: useful outcomes for testing therapy of acute submassive pulmonary embolism? Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2007; 28(20): 2430 - 2431. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Becattini, M. C. Vedovati, and G. Agnelli Prognostic Value of Troponins in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Meta-Analysis Circulation, July 24, 2007; 116(4): 427 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Jimenez, R. D. Yusen, R. Otero, F. Uresandi, D. Nauffal, E. Laserna, F. Conget, M. Oribe, M. A. Cabezudo, and G. Diaz Prognostic Models for Selecting Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism for Initial Outpatient Therapy Chest, July 1, 2007; 132(1): 24 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. Carlbom and B. L. Davidson Pulmonary Embolism in the Critically Ill Chest, July 1, 2007; 132(1): 313 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Abroug, L. Ouanes-Besbes, N. Nciri, N. Sellami, F. Addad, K. B. Hamda, A. B. Amor, M. F. Najjar, and J. Knani Association of Left-Heart Dysfunction with Severe Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Diagnostic Performance of Cardiac Biomarkers Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 1, 2006; 174(9): 990 - 996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Kostrubiec, A. Kaczynska, and P. Pruszczyk Risk assessment in acute pulmonary embolism Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2006; 27(11): 1384 - 1384. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W.H. W. Tang and G. S. Francis The Year in Heart Failure J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 6, 2005; 46(11): 2125 - 2133. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Giannitsis and H. A. Katus Risk Stratification in Pulmonary Embolism Based on Biomarkers and Echocardiography Circulation, September 13, 2005; 112(11): 1520 - 1521. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||