| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2005;111:887-893.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Heart Failure |
From CharitéUniversity Medicine Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Medical Clinic II, Berlin (U.K., M.P., M.N., B.S., D.L., W.P., H.-P.S.), and University of Tübingen, Department of Molecular Pathology, Tübingen (T.B., R.K.), Germany.
Correspondence to Uwe Kühl, PhD, MD, ChariteUniversity Medicine Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200 Berlin, Germany. E-mail uwe.kuehl{at}charite.de
Received June 9, 2004; revision received October 12, 2004; accepted November 23, 2004.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results EMBs were obtained for PCR analysis from 245 consecutive patients (median left ventricular ejection fraction, 35.0%; range, 9% to 59%). PCR and reverse transcriptionPCR were performed to detect the genomic sequences of enterovirus (EV), adenovirus (ADV), human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), herpes simplex virus, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6), parvovirus B19 (PVB19), and influenza A and B viruses. Myocardial inflammation was assessed by histological and immunohistological analyses. Viral genomes could be amplified from EMBs of 165 (67.4%) of the 245 DCM patients: EV=23 (9.4%), ADV=4 (1.6%), PVB19=126 (51.4%), HHV-6=53 (21.6%), EBV=5 (2.0%), HCMV=2 (0.8%), including n=45 cases (27.3%) with multiple infections. Active or borderline myocarditis according to the Dallas classification did not exist in any case. Lymphocyte and macrophage infiltrates were not significantly different in virus-positive versus virus-negative patients.
Conclusions Viral genomes were frequently detected in EMBs of patients with systolic left ventricular dysfunction. Our data suggest that myocardial persistence of various viruses, often presenting as multiple infections, may play a role in the pathogenesis of DCM far more frequently than suspected so far.
Key Words: cardiomyopathy myocarditis viruses muscles heart diseases
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
EMB and Right-Heart Catheterization
Eight EMBs were obtained from the right side of the ventricular septum of each patient with a flexible bioptome (Westmed) via the femoral vein approach. Two EMBs were used for the histological evaluation according to the Dallas criteria10 and immunohistological evaluation of intramyocardial inflammation,11 respectively, whereas the remaining 4 EMBs were subjected to DNA and RNA extraction for the amplification of viral genomes. After the EMBs were obtained, the patients underwent right-heart catheterization. A thermodilution Swan-Ganz catheter was used to measure right atrial (RA, mm Hg), right ventricular (RV, mm Hg), and pulmonary arterial (PA, mm Hg) pressures. Standard 2D and M-mode echocardiography were performed 1 day before or on the day of obtaining EMBs in all patients. For each echocardiogram, LV diastolic (LVEDD) and systolic (LVESD) dimensions were measured by M-mode echocardiography in the parasternal long-axis view using the leading-edge method. Percentage fractional shortening was calculated in a standardized manner.
Etiologic Investigations
Detection of Viral Genomes by Nested PCR
DNA and RNA were extracted from frozen heart muscle tissue probes. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)/reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) was performed for the detection of enteroviruses (including coxsackievirus and echovirus), adenovirus,12 parvovirus B19,9,13 human herpesvirus type 6,13 human cytomegalovirus,14 Epstein-Barr virus,15 influenza virus A and B,16 herpes simplex virus 1 and 2,17 and hepatitis virus C.18 In addition, DNA was extracted from peripheral blood cells (PBLs) to exclude a systemic infection with PVB19, EBV, and HHV6. As a control for successful extraction of DNA and RNA from heart muscle tissue, oligonucleotide sequences were chosen from the DNA sequence of the GAPDH gene.19
Histological and Immunohistological Analysis of Infiltrating Lymphocytes
For histological analysis of myocardial inflammation, paraffin-embedded EMBs were analyzed according to the Dallas classification. Immunohistological analysis of infiltrating immunocompetent cells in frozen sections was performed as published elsewhere.11,20
Serological Investigations
Because a lack of correlation with biopsy findings has been reported for most cardiotropic viruses, only a PVB19 serological analysis was performed in a subgroup of 178 patients, using remcomBlot Parvovirus-B19-IgG (Mikrogen).
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using JMP Statistical Discovery Software, Version 3.1.6 (SAS Institute, Inc). All results are presented as median values (10th, 90th percentile), except when stated otherwise. Qualitative data were compared by conducting the
2 test. A probability value (2 sided) of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Histopathology and Immunohistochemistry
Histological analysis did not show active or borderline myocarditis in any of the samples analyzed. In the immunohistological stainings, neither T-lymphocytic or macrophage infiltrates nor endothelial expression of cell adhesion molecules (HLA-I/ICAM-1) distinguished between virus-positive and virus-negative patients (Table 3). However, numbers of lymphocytes and macrophages were increased (>7 cells/mm2) in both virus-positive and virus-negative tissues (Table 3), and adhesion molecule expression correlated with infiltrating inflammatory cell numbers. Virus typespecific analysis of inflammatory cells or adhesion molecules was not performed because of the rather small size of the virus subgroups.
|
PVB19 Serology
Positive PVB19 IgG titers were detected in 99 of 104 (95.2%) PVB19 PCRpositive and 29 of 74 (39.2%) PVB19 PCRnegative patients. Forty-five patients (60.8%) without detectable PVB19 genome in the EMB had a negative IgG serology (Tables 4 and 5
). The frequency of age-dependent PVB19-IgG titers reflected the reported prevalence of PVB19 IgG antibodies in the population.21 Positive PCB19 IgM titers were not detected in any of the patients. With regard to PVB19 PCR data, the diagnostic value of PVB19 serology was calculated as follows: sensitivity (95.2%), specificity (60.8%), predictive value for PVB19 infection (68.2%), predictive value for exclusion of PVB19 infection (93.8%).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The high prevalence (67.4%) of viral genomes and multiple viral infections in the myocardium of patients with DCM was unexpected, although viral causes have long been discussed for patients with the unexplained ventricular dysfunction syndrome referred to as "idiopathic" DCM.1,2,26 This term, which constituted the final diagnostic result obtained in the majority of patients with the clinical phenotype of DCM, is unlikely to remain satisfying in the long run. It rather reflects the insensitivity of the diagnostic tools used so far and may in part be because former studies have not taken into consideration a broad panel of potentially cardiotropic viral agents during the diagnostic procedure, but have instead relied on EV and ADV only. PVB19 and HHV6 genomes, detected at frequencies of 51.4% and 21.6%, respectively, in our analysis, have previously been reported in cardiomyopathies of childhood.13,2729 In adults, however, PVB19 and HHV6 have so far been detected as possible pathogenic agents only in rare cases of myocarditis and DCM.9,25,30
Virus-Associated Intramyocardial Inflammation
Conventional histological analyses did not detect active or borderline myocarditis in any of the 245 patients. This observation confirms that routine histological analysis is too insensitive to detect myocardial inflammation accurately in the chronic phase of the disease or if only a few samples are used for routine analysis.31 With regard to the immunohistological analysis of infiltrating immune cells, viral genomes were detected in similar frequencies regardless of the number of lymphocytes or macrophages infiltrating the myocardium. This finding is consistent with the hypothesis that virus persistence is promoted if the antiviral immune response is inefficient, as discussed above, and that anticardiac autoimmunity ensues in some DCM patients despite virus elimination.32 Follow-up investigations are warranted to elucidate whether virus persistence or clearance is influenced by the hosts individual immune responses during the natural course of the disease and by antiviral treatment, thereby influencing the natural course of the disease.8
Possible Consequences of Cardiac Viral Infection
The detection of viral genomes in 67.4% of cases in a series of 245 DCM patients does not per se prove a causal role of any virus in the pathogenesis or further progression of the disease. However, these data strongly suggest that viral infections, which are not detected in normal hearts of multiorgan donors or valvular heart disease,33,34 may play a major role at some time during the pathogenesis of DCM. In addition to direct cytopathic effects of viruses such as EV or ADV, other virus-triggered pathomechanisms may be involved. Both PVB19 and HHV6 have been shown to infect various tissues, including vascular endothelial cells and mitotic fetal cardiomyocytes. High expression levels of the PVB19 and HHV6 receptors (P-antigen/
5ß1-integrin and CD46, respectively) on endothelial cells may facilitate infections of the coronary vascular endothelium with these viruses and thereby aggravate virus-induced cardiac pathological conditions.9 HHV6 may directly lyse and thus destroy target cells, or it may induce immune or autoimmune reactions as a consequence of HHV6-induced alterations of cytokine expression patterns. HHV6 is also able to modulate cell membrane receptors, leading to harmful tissue inflammation and/or immune suppression and preventing virus clearance.35 Indirect damage to primarily noninfectable cells and tissues (eg, cardiomyocytes) may originate from HHV6-induced complement activation and immune and/or autoimmune reactions.35 Notably, HHV6 is able to activate other viral infections, eg, those induced by EBV or PVB19, and thus may enhance the pathogenicity of these viruses.35 Even a small cardiac load of persisting viral genomes may theoretically sustain further progression of the disease, either by direct low-level cytopathic effects of virus-encoded proteins or by indirect virus-induced sequelae, such as local chronic myocardial inflammation,36 local release of cytokines,37,38 disruption of dystrophin,39 modulation of cellular signaling pathways,40 or alterations of the extracellular matrix. Even if a virus was cleared spontaneously during the natural course of the disease, the initial viral infection may nevertheless have caused a minor but irreversible structural damage to the myocardium during the early stages of the disease that later slowly progresses to more severe systolic dysfunction and ventricular dilatation. This would resemble the slow remodeling process observed after myocardial infarction, and because the primary viral pathogenic agent would no longer be detectable in the myocardium, the diagnostic procedures would yield virus-negative "idiopathic" DCM.
Multiple Viral Infections: Possible Origins and Consequences
In 27% of the virus-positive patients, dual or multiple infections of the myocardium with different combinations of viruses were detected. The pathways for viral entry into the myocardium have not yet been fully delineated, especially not for cases of multiple viral infections. Induction of the coxsackievirus adenovirus receptor (CAR), a common receptor for both coxsackieviruses and adenoviruses, has been observed in DCM but not in other cardiomyopathies.41 This provides a basis both for cardiac infection with any CAR-dependent virus (EV/ADV) and also for the existence of dual infections by the respective viruses,7 which are further influenced by distinct coreceptors for the 2 viruses. Another common receptor (CD46) shared by 2 otherwise unrelated viruses (HHV6 and CAR-independent group B ADVs) has recently been identified.42 In line with the distribution patterns of the virus receptors on the surface of either cardiomyocytes or vascular endothelial cells, the respective viruses have been localized within distinguishable cellular compartments (myocardium or the coronary vascular endothelium) by in situ hybridization.25,43,44 Induction and modulation of cardiac receptor and coreceptor expression patterns may explain not only the existence of organ infections by multiple viruses but also the highly variable presentation and outcome of patients with viral heart diseases. Genetic determinants of receptor expression, immune reactions, or myocardial structure certainly also influence the disease course. Viral infections of different cellular compartments of the heart, however, should have grossly different effects on the hemodynamic course and clinical complaints, depending on whether the patient suffers from a primarily myocardial (eg, EV, ADV) or coronary vascular endothelial (eg, PVB19, HHV6) infection.
The hemodynamic course of DCM is variable and not predictable. In patients with dual infections, however, clearance of only one virus could explain the hemodynamic improvement of patients in whom another viral genome is still detectable in follow-up biopsies during the course of the disease.45 This hypothesis is consistent with our own experience when following the natural course of dual myocardial viral infections (eg, PVB19 and HHV6) and also when treating such patients with IFN-ß. Spontaneous or IFN-ßinduced clearance of one of the 2 viruses was often associated with hemodynamic improvement, despite the persistence of the other virus. Thus, restricted virological diagnostic procedures not addressing the possibility of multiple viral infections of the myocardium may be a key reason for the controversial results reported in the past for the clinical course of patients with virus-associated heart disease.
Virus Serology
Several reports have stressed the fact that serological analysis for virus IgM or IgG antibodies does not correlate with local virus infection of the myocardium of most cardiotropic viruses analyzed so far, and therefore the absence or presence of antiviral antibodies does not allow any conclusions about infection of the myocardium.46 Corresponding data analyzing PVB19 and HHV6 serology in association with heart diseases have not been available so far. PVB19 and HHV6 are common causes of human infections worldwide. Approximately 30% to 50% of children below age 15 years are seropositive, a prevalence that rises to >90% in the elderly.21 Subgroup analysis (n=178) detected HHV6 IgG antibodies in 90% of patients regardless of their HHV6-PCR results for EMBs. No diagnostic information could be drawn from this analysis (data not shown). As expected, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value for positive detection of PVB19 antibodies of IgG type were low because of the high prevalence of PVB19 antibodies in adults and did not provide additional diagnostic information for the diagnosis of PVB19 infection of the myocardium. PVB19 serology had, however, a high negative predictive value of 93.8% for PVB19-negative biopsies, because PVB19-positive serology was found in only 5 (4.8%) of 50 PVB19 PCR EMB-negative patients.
Conclusions
In view of the high prevalence (67%) of viral genomes in the myocardium of 245 consecutively analyzed DCM patients as reported here, viral infections of the myocardium should be considered as possible triggers or contributing factors for the development of the disease in a large fraction of the DCM patients. These results underline the need for biopsy-based molecular virological analyses in patients with heart failure of unknown cause. The unexpected high prevalence of viral genomes further suggests that viral myocarditis may be a more frequent initial trigger for the development of DCM than assumed so far and that a large fraction of DCM patients may have passed through viral myocarditis with subclinical presentation. Pathomechanisms induced during the early stages of unrecognized viral myocarditis may then be responsible for later progression to DCM by remodeling or immunopathology after elimination of the primary viral agent. Thus, the present data are consistent with a novel pathogenic concept of "viral" DCM. In light of the efficacy of antiviral treatment in patients with chronic heart failure associated with enteroviral or adenoviral persistence, antiviral strategies may have therapeutic potential in a large fraction of DCM patients.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
vß3 and
vß5 on the cardiomyocyte sarcolemma and upregulated in dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2001; 104: 275280.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Dennert, H. J. Crijns, and S. Heymans Acute viral myocarditis Eur. Heart J., July 9, 2008; (2008) ehn296v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Yilmaz, K. Klingel, R. Kandolf, and U. Sechtem A geographical mystery: do cardiotropic viruses respect national borders? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 2008; 52(1): 82 - 82. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Norja, A. M. Eis-Hubinger, M. Soderlund-Venermo, K. Hedman, and P. Simmonds Rapid Sequence Change and Geographical Spread of Human Parvovirus B19: Comparison of B19 Virus Evolution in Acute and Persistent Infections J. Virol., July 1, 2008; 82(13): 6427 - 6433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Skurk, F. Wittchen, L. Suckau, H. Witt, M. Noutsias, H. Fechner, H.-P. Schultheiss, and W. Poller Description of a local cardiac adiponectin system and its deregulation in dilated cardiomyopathy Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2008; 29(9): 1168 - 1180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Simon, P. Paule, and M. Oliver Chikungunya Virus-Induced Myopericarditis: Toward an Increase of Dilated Cardiomyopathy in Countries with Epidemics? Am J Trop Med Hyg, February 1, 2008; 78(2): 212 - 213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gutberlet, B. Spors, T. Thoma, H. Bertram, T. Denecke, R. Felix, M. Noutsias, H.-P. Schultheiss, and U. Kuhl Suspected Chronic Myocarditis at Cardiac MR: Diagnostic Accuracy and Association with Immunohistologically Detected Inflammation and Viral Persistence Radiology, February 1, 2008; 246(2): 401 - 409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zurney, K. E. Howard, and B. Sherry Basal Expression Levels of IFNAR and Jak-STAT Components Are Determinants of Cell-Type-Specific Differences in Cardiac Antiviral Responses J. Virol., December 15, 2007; 81(24): 13668 - 13680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. T. Cooper, K. L. Baughman, A. M. Feldman, A. Frustaci, M. Jessup, U. Kuhl, G. N. Levine, J. Narula, R. C. Starling, J. Towbin, et al. The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the management of cardiovascular disease: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the European Society of Cardiology Endorsed by the Heart Failure Society of America and the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2007; 28(24): 3076 - 3093. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. T. Cooper, K. L. Baughman, A. M. Feldman, A. Frustaci, M. Jessup, U. Kuhl, G. N. Levine, J. Narula, R. C. Starling, J. Towbin, et al. The Role of Endomyocardial Biopsy in the Management of Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the European Society of Cardiology Endorsed by the Heart Failure Society of America and the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 6, 2007; 50(19): 1914 - 1931. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. T. Cooper, K. L. Baughman, A. M. Feldman, A. Frustaci, M. Jessup, U. Kuhl, G. N. Levine, J. Narula, R. C. Starling, J. Towbin, et al. The Role of Endomyocardial Biopsy in the Management of Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the European Society of Cardiology Circulation, November 6, 2007; 116(19): 2216 - 2233. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Binymin Comment on: Adult-onset Still's disease and myocarditis: successful treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin and maintenance of remission with etanercept Rheumatology, November 1, 2007; 46(11): 1741 - 1742. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hausler, B. Sellhaus, S. Scheithauer, B. Gaida, S. Kuropka, K. Siepmann, A. Panek, W. Berg, A. Teubner, K. Ritter, et al. Myocarditis in newborn wild-type BALB/c mice infected with the murine gamma herpesvirus MHV-68 Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 2007; 76(2): 323 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L.P. Caforio, F. Calabrese, A. Angelini, F. Tona, A. Vinci, S. Bottaro, A. Ramondo, E. Carturan, S. Iliceto, G. Thiene, et al. A prospective study of biopsy-proven myocarditis: prognostic relevance of clinical and aetiopathogenetic features at diagnosis Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2007; 28(11): 1326 - 1333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Heymans Myocarditis and heart failure: need for better diagnostic, predictive, and therapeutic tools Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2007; 28(11): 1279 - 1280. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Maekawa, M. Ouzounian, M. A. Opavsky, and P. P. Liu Connecting the Missing Link Between Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Viral Myocarditis: Virus, Cytoskeleton, and Innate Immunity Circulation, January 2, 2007; 115(1): 5 - 8. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. N. Skouri, G. W. Dec, M. G. Friedrich, and L. T. Cooper Noninvasive Imaging in Myocarditis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 21, 2006; 48(10): 2085 - 2093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Mahrholdt, A. Wagner, C. C. Deluigi, E. Kispert, S. Hager, G. Meinhardt, H. Vogelsberg, P. Fritz, J. Dippon, C. -T. Bock, et al. Presentation, Patterns of Myocardial Damage, and Clinical Course of Viral Myocarditis Circulation, October 10, 2006; 114(15): 1581 - 1590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Norja, K. Hokynar, L.-M. Aaltonen, R. Chen, A. Ranki, E. K. Partio, O. Kiviluoto, I. Davidkin, T. Leivo, A. M. Eis-Hubinger, et al. Bioportfolio: Lifelong persistence of variant and prototypic erythrovirus DNA genomes in human tissue PNAS, May 9, 2006; 103(19): 7450 - 7453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |