| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2005;111:650-656.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Vascular Medicine |
From the Divisions of Chemoprevention (A.D., B.B.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (P.M., N.R., P.B.), and Senology (V.S., U.V.), European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; Department of Medical and Preventive Oncology (A.D.), Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy; Ospedale Moriggia Pelascini (D.B.), Gravedona, Italy; and Fondazione Maugeri (A.C.), Pavia, Italy; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (V.S.), New York, NY; Centro Cardiologico Monzino (A.S.), Milan, Italy; Comitato Prevenzione Tumori (R.T.), Milan, Italy; Istituto Pascale (P.O., G.D.A.), Naples, Italy; Ospedale San Bortolo (M.G.), Vicenza, Italy; Ospedale San Camillo-Forlanini (G.G.), Rome, Italy; Centro Prevenzione Oncologica (M.R.T.), Florence, Italy; Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (M.A.P.), Aviano, Italy; and Ospedale Mariano Santo (S.C.), Cosenza, Italy.
Correspondence to Andrea Decensi, MD, European Institute of Oncology, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy. E-mail andrea.decensi{at}ieo.it
Received April 6, 2004; revision received October 27, 2004; accepted November 3, 2004.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results The incidence of VTE was studied in 5408 hysterectomized women randomly assigned to tamoxifen 20 mg/d or placebo for 5 years. There were 28 VTEs on placebo and 44 on tamoxifen therapy (hazard ratio [HR]=1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02 to 2.63), 80% of which were superficial phlebitis, accounting for all of the excess due to tamoxifen within 18 months from randomization. Compared with placebo, the risk of VTE on tamoxifen was higher in women aged 55 years or older, women with a body mass index
25 kg/m2, elevated blood pressure, total cholesterol
250 mg/dL, current smoking, and a family history of coronary heart disease (CHD). Of the 685 women with a CHD risk score
5 who entered the trial, 1 in the placebo arm and 13 in the tamoxifen arm developed VTE (log-rank P=0.0013). In multivariate regression analysis, age
60 years, height
165 cm, and diastolic blood pressure
90 mm Hg had independent detrimental effects on VTE risk during tamoxifen therapy, whereas transdermal estrogen therapy concomitant with tamoxifen was not associated with any excess of VTE (HR=0.64; 95% CI, 0.23 to 1.82).
Conclusions Women with conventional risk factors for atherosclerosis have a higher risk of VTE during tamoxifen therapy. This information should be incorporated into counseling women on its risk-benefit ratio, particularly in the prevention setting.
Key Words: prevention veins thrombosis risk factors trials
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
See p 539
Although the development of endometrial cancer is often symptomatic, can be detected by different screening methods, and is rarely life threatening, the onset of VTE is less predictable and may sometimes be lethal. In a recent meta-analysis of 4 major primary prevention trials of tamoxifen involving 28 406 subjects,2 the use of tamoxifen was associated with 118 serious VTEs versus 62 in the placebo group, with a relative risk of 1.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4 to 2.6), including 6 versus 2 cases of fatal pulmonary emboli. Moreover, the risk of superficial thrombophlebitis was doubled with tamoxifen relative to placebo (68 versus 30 events).
Assessing the baseline risk of developing VTE and its association with tamoxifen may have important implications in determining the risk-benefit ratio of tamoxifen, both in the treatment and particularly in the prevention setting. Insight into the factors associated with VTE risk during tamoxifen use was recently provided by the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS), wherein major VTEs increased significantly during tamoxifen therapy within 3 months of major surgery, immobilization, or fracture.5 In addition, recent studies have suggested that atherosclerosis may induce VTEs or that the 2 conditions share common risk factors.6 Indeed, studies have found an association between hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and VTEs.7,8 Also, cholesterol-lowering agents such as statins have been shown to decrease VTE risk in recent trials.9,10
In the present study, we assessed the effect of tamoxifen on VTEs in the Italian breast cancer prevention trial in hysterectomized women and studied its association with recognized or putative risk factors for VTEs.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Study Objectives and Outcomes
The main objectives of the present study were to (1) compare the effect of tamoxifen and placebo on the incidence of VTEs during the 5-year intervention period and (2) determine which factors were associated with an increased risk of VTEs in each arm.
All VTEs were centrally adjudicated by an external committee that reviewed in a blinded fashion all case records of suspicious VTE submitted by the participating centers. Cases had to be confirmed by ultrasonography, Doppler ultrasonography, or hospital admissions records. Selection of the factors that could explain an association between VTEs and tamoxifen treatment was prespecified and included conventional risk factors for VTEs, such as age, body mass index (kg/m2), smoking, current or past use of ERT, trauma, surgery and immobilization, and diabetes mellitus. In addition, we analyzed the association between risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD) and VTEs and their interaction with tamoxifen, inasmuch as recent data indicate that atherosclerosis may induce VTEs or that the 2 conditions share common risk factors.68 For this purpose, we utilized the CHD score system developed by our group for assessing the eligibility of the women entering the trial, which included the following variables: stable angina (absent/present), 0/5; ischemic cardiopathy (no/yes), 0/3; total cholesterol (<250/250 to 300/>300 mg/dL), 0/1/2; diabetes (no/yes), 0/3; smoking (no/former/current, 5 to 20 cigarettes per day/>20 cigarettes per day), 0/2/2/3; family history of CHD (no/yes), 0/3; obesity (no/yes), 0/1; hypertension on treatment (no/yes), 0/1. This model has not been validated in previous settings. Finally, we utilized the latest version of the Framingham score system,13 a validated risk assessment model for CHD, which includes age, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, blood pressure, diabetes, and smoking. In this model, prediction of CHD risk factors is based on a prospective, single-center study of 2856 women 30 to 74 years old at baseline with 12 years of follow-up. However, as many as 1601 subjects were not assessable with the Framingham risk score in our study because baseline HDL cholesterol was not requested per protocol.
Statistical Methods
The Cox proportional-hazards regression model was used to assess the association between selected subject characteristics and the development of VTEs in the placebo group, thus identifying risk factors for VTEs in the study sample.14 The Cox model was also used to assess the effect of tamoxifen on the development of VTEs in the whole study group and in different subsets of subjects according to their baseline characteristics. A stepwise multivariate regression model was used to identify the baseline subject characteristics that were independently associated with the development of VTEs during tamoxifen intervention.
All models were adjusted for age. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the cumulative incidences of VTEs during intervention, which were compared by the log-rank test.15 All analyses were conducted according to the intention-to-treat approach and were performed with SAS software. All tests were 2 sided.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
The association between baseline risk factors and VTEs in the 2 treatment arms adjusted for age is summarized in Table 2. In the placebo arm, there was a trend toward a higher risk of VTEs with increasing age (P for trend=0.05), whereas baseline weight, use of ERT at randomization, hypertension, total cholesterol, smoking, and family history of CHD were not significantly associated with the development of VTEs. Tamoxifen increased significantly the risk of VTEs relative to placebo (hazard ratio [HR]=1.63; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.63). The association between tamoxifen and VTE risk was stronger in women with the following characteristics: age 55 years or older (HR=2.03; 95% CI, 1.00 to 4.11), systolic blood pressure
140 mm Hg (HR=2.59; 95% CI, 1.28 to 5.22), total cholesterol
250 mg/dL (HR=2.81; 95% CI, 1.10 to 7.19), ever smoking (HR=3.78; 95% CI, 1.40 to 10.2), and family history of CHD (HR=3.60; 95% CI, 1.19 to 10.9). Notably, the risk of VTEs during tamoxifen was higher in women not on ERT at randomization (HR=1.87; 95% CI, 1.11 to 3.14), whereas there was no trend toward a higher risk in women who were on ERT at randomization (HR=0.80; 95% CI, 0.22 to 2.83). Among women who had VTEs, there was no significant association between recent surgery, fracture or immobility, and treatment arm (not shown).
|
The association between treatment and VTEs according to a global cardiovascular risk score is illustrated in Table 3. Whereas women with an elevated CHD risk based on the Italian or the Framingham score showed no increased risk of VTEs in the placebo arm, those allocated to tamoxifen with elevated CHD risk based on the Italian score had a significantly greater risk of VTEs (HR=13.3; 95% CI, 1.73 to 101.6). Of the 685 women with a CHD score
5, 1 subject in the placebo arm and 13 subjects in the tamoxifen arm developed VTEs (log-rank P=0.0013). A positive association between tamoxifen and the development of VTEs was noted, albeit to a lower extent, also in women with an elevated Framingham score (
10 points).
|
When each factor was assessed as an independent predictor of VTEs by the Cox proportional-hazards model, age
60 years, height
165 cm, and diastolic blood pressure
90 mm Hg had an independent effect on VTE risk during tamoxifen treatment at P<0.05 (Table 4). Interestingly, ERT at baseline was not associated with any excess VTEs during tamoxifen (HR=0.64, 95% CI, 0.23 to 1.82, P=0.40).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our study aimed at providing further insight into the factors associated with this risk of developing VTEs on tamoxifen. Our primary prevention trial in healthy women at average risk for breast cancer indicates that tamoxifen induced a borderline significantly higher risk of VTEs (HR=1.63; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.63). Importantly, the majority of all VTEs were superficial thrombophlebitis, which accounted for all of the excess VTEs attributable to tamoxifen. Also, all VTE excess due to tamoxifen occurred within the first 18 months from randomization, a finding that is in line with that observed with ERT, wherein the risk of VTEs is highest in the first year of use.17 This observation suggests that closer surveillance and preventive measures may be appropriate during this period in at-risk subjects, possibly including use of aspirin or statins.
Although some of the known risk factors associated with VTEs, including age18,19 and height,20 explained the risk of VTEs in the placebo arm, several risk factors for CHD such as increased diastolic blood pressure and, to a lesser extent, high total cholesterol levels, explained the higher risk of VTEs during tamoxifen. These results support recent hypotheses of a link between atherosclerosis and VTEs68 and suggest that tamoxifen triggers some of these common mechanistic pathways. Likewise, women with prior CHD have a higher risk of VTEs during ERT,17 presumably as a result of activation of platelets, blood coagulation, and increase in fibrin turnover.2123 In our study, the relative risk of VTEs under tamoxifen was substantially lower than in other prevention trials, including the NSABP-P1 trial,3 IBIS,5 and the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) trial of raloxifene.24 More important, the risk of VTEs was limited to superficial thrombophlebitis and, unlike other prevention trials, both deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary emboli were not increased on tamoxifen. Variations in genetic, dietary, and lifestyle components between southern European and northern European or US women may account for these differences, as well as differences in selection criteria. For instance, all women in our trial had been hysterectomized because of benign disorders and may therefore be a selected group at a lower risk of VTEs because they underwent pelvic surgery without VTE complications. Moreover, the majority of our study participants were not at higher risk for breast cancer. Although there is no evidence for a direct link between risk factors for breast cancer and VTEs and the MORE trial has shown no association between circulating estradiol and VTE risk on raloxifene,25 it is possible that the 2 disorders share common mechanistic pathways and that tamoxifen interacts with some of these factors. For instance, sex-steroid hormones are known to play an important role in both diseases, as shown by the association between circulating estradiol and breast cancer risk26 and between oral contraceptives and VTE risk.27 Further studies are necessary to clarify this issue.
One important finding in our study is the lack of a detrimental interaction between ERT and tamoxifen on VTEs. Indeed, the positive association between VTEs and use of tamoxifen was restricted to women not on ERT at baseline, whereas women on ERT at baseline experienced no risk of VTEs. The results are consistent with the IBIS trial data,28 in which a favorable interaction between HRT use and tamoxifen was noted. In that study, among ever-users of HRT, there were 12 cases of VTEs in 1849 women allocated to tamoxifen compared with 9 VTEs in 1783 women allocated to placebo, whereas among never-users of HRT, there were 31 VTEs in 1724 women allocated to tamoxifen versus 8 VTEs in 1783 women allocated to placebo. Likewise, in the NSABP-P1 trial, the risk of VTEs under tamoxifen was lower in women aged 50 or younger (premenopausal) than in older women.3 In our study, the vast majority of the women received transdermal unopposed estradiol, which is associated with a lower VTE risk compared with both oral estrogen therapy29 and combined estroprogestins.30 Taken together, these observations suggest that the prothrombotic estrogenic effect of tamoxifen varies, depending on the womans endocrine milieu, and tends to be attenuated in premenopausal women or women taking HRT, particularly when administered by the transdermal route. Although a healthier selection bias cannot be excluded in our study, as women who were prescribed ERT for symptomatic relief may be at a lower risk of VTEs, our results suggest that the combination of ERT and tamoxifen is safe and may in fact retain the benefits while reducing the risks of both agents. A phase III trial is currently taking place to address these issues.31
In conclusion, our data indicate that tamoxifen slightly increased the risk of VTEs in healthy women at average risk for developing breast cancer. The excess was restricted to superficial thrombophlebitis during the first 18 months. Women at high risk for CHD were at greater risk for VTEs on tamoxifen, whereas use of transdermal ERT was associated with no excess of VTEs. Assessment of the baseline risk of VTEs should become an important component of counseling women on the use of tamoxifen, particularly in the prevention setting.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Articles:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. S.M. Buist, L. Ichikawa, M. N. Prout, M. U. Yood, T. S. Field, C. Owusu, A. M. Geiger, V. P. Quinn, F. Wei, and R. A. Silliman Receipt of Appropriate Primary Breast Cancer Therapy and Adjuvant Therapy Are Not Associated With Obesity in Older Women With Access to Health Care J. Clin. Oncol., August 10, 2007; 25(23): 3428 - 3436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Gallo, E. Mantuano, M. Fabrizi, C. Ferlini, S. Mozzetti, I. De Stefano, and G. Scambia Effects of a phytoestrogen-containing soy extract on the growth-inhibitory activity of ICI 182 780 in an experimental model of estrogen-dependent breast cancer Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2007; 14(2): 317 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Veronesi, P. Maisonneuve, N. Rotmensz, B. Bonanni, P. Boyle, G. Viale, A. Costa, V. Sacchini, R. Travaglini, G. D'Aiuto, et al. Tamoxifen for the Prevention of Breast Cancer: Late Results of the Italian Randomized Tamoxifen Prevention Trial Among Women With Hysterectomy J Natl Cancer Inst, May 2, 2007; 99(9): 727 - 737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. G. Vogel, J. P. Costantino, D. L. Wickerham, W. M. Cronin, R. S. Cecchini, J. N. Atkins, T. B. Bevers, L. Fehrenbacher, E. R. Pajon Jr, J. L. Wade III, et al. Effects of Tamoxifen vs Raloxifene on the Risk of Developing Invasive Breast Cancer and Other Disease Outcomes: The NSABP Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 Trial JAMA, June 21, 2006; 295(23): 2727 - 2741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Z. Goldhaber Tamoxifen: Preventing Breast Cancer and Placing the Risk of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Perspective Circulation, February 8, 2005; 111(5): 539 - 541. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |