This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 111/17/2203    most recent 01.CIR.0000163569.97918.C0v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schillinger, M. Articles by Minar, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schillinger, M. Articles by Minar, E. Related Collections Pathophysiology Risk Factors Carotid Stenosis Other Vascular biology Related Article

(Circulation. 2005;111:2203-2209.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.

Vascular Medicine

Inflammation and Carotid Artery—Risk for Atherosclerosis Study (ICARAS)

Martin Schillinger, MD; Markus Exner, MD; Wolfgang Mlekusch, MD; Schila Sabeti, MD; Jasmin Amighi, MD; Robert Nikowitsch; Ewald Timmel; Bernhard Kickinger; Christoph Minar; Matthias Pones; Wolfgang Lalouschek, MD; Helmut Rumpold, MD; Gerald Maurer, MD; Oswald Wagner, MD; Erich Minar, MD

From the Departments of Angiology (M.S., W.M., S.S., J.A., R.N., E.T., B.K., C.M., M.P., E.M.), Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics (M.E., H.R., O.W.), Neurology (W.L.), and Cardiology (G.M.), University of Vienna, Medical School, Vienna, Austria.

Correspondence to Martin Schillinger, MD, Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Angiology, University of Vienna, Medical School, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. E-mail martin.schillinger{at}meduniwien.ac.at

Received June 2, 2004; revision received January 12, 2005; accepted January 19, 2005.

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Background— Compelling evidence suggests that inflammation is fundamentally involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis; however, temporal correlation between inflammation and morphological features of atherosclerosis progression has not been demonstrated unequivocally.

Methods and Results— We prospectively studied 1268 consecutive patients who were initially asymptomatic with respect to carotid artery disease. Patients underwent serial carotid ultrasound investigations at baseline and after a follow-up interval of a median of 7.5 months (range 6 to 9 months), with measurement of carotid flow velocities and categorization of carotid arteries as 0% to 29%, 30% to 49%, 50% to 69%, 70% to 89%, or 90% to 99% stenosed or occluded. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and serum amyloid A (SAA) were measured at baseline and follow-up. Progression of carotid atherosclerosis was found in 103 (8.1%) of 1268 patients. Hs-CRP and SAA, respectively, at baseline (P=0.004 and P=0.014) and follow-up (P<0.001 and P<0.001) and the change from baseline to follow-up (P<0.001 and P<0.001) were significantly associated with progressive atherosclerosis. Adjusted ORs (95% CI) for atherosclerosis progression with increasing quintiles of baseline hs-CRP were 1.65 (0.71 to 3.84), 1.87 (0.8 to 4.37), 3.32 (1.49 to 7.39), and 3.65 (1.65 to 8.08), and with increasing quintiles of baseline SAA, they were 0.86 (0.38 to 1.92), 0.99 (0.49 to 1.99), 1.72 (0.91 to 3.28), and 2.28 (1.24 to 4.20), respectively, compared with the lowest quintiles.

Conclusions— These findings supply evidence for a close temporal correlation between inflammation and morphological features of rapidly progressive carotid atherosclerosis, which suggests that elevation or increase of the inflammatory biomarkers hs-CRP and SAA identifies the presence of active atherosclerotic disease.

Key Words: inflammation • atherosclerosis • carotid arteries • plaque • amyloid

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Complications of atherosclerosis are the most common causes of morbidity and mortality in Western societies. Among these, stroke is the third-leading cause of death and the most common cause of permanent disability.¹ Large-artery thromboembolism originating from atherosclerosis in the carotid arteries accounts for 30% of these events. Recently, a substantially increased risk for neurological events was noted in patients with rapid progression of atherosclerotic lesions in the carotid arteries, with 2-year stroke rates exceeding 10%.² Prediction of the risk for progression of carotid atherosclerosis, however, remains a major unresolved issue.

Compelling evidence suggests that inflammation is fundamentally involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis.^3–6 In broad outline, atherosclerosis can be considered to be a form of chronic inflammation that results from an interaction between modified lipoproteins, monocyte-derived macrophages, T cells, and the normal cellular elements of the arterial wall.⁶ The inflammatory process leads to the development of complex lesions, or plaques, that progressively protrude into the arterial lumen, causing arterial stenoses and occlusions.³ The extent of inflammation as measured by specific biomarkers likely reflects the activity of the disease and thus may predict the individual’s risk for progression of atherosclerosis. In this context, numerous studies elucidated the association between inflammation and clinical surrogate markers of atherosclerosis progression, mainly the occurrence of cardiovascular adverse events such as myocardial infarction and stroke^7–18; however, a direct temporal correlation between inflammation and morphological features of atherosclerosis progression has not been demonstrated unequivocally.

Among the panel of inflammatory biomarkers, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and serum amyloid A (SAA) represent powerful cardiovascular risk predictors.^7–18 We hypothesized that inflammatory activity, measured by hs-CRP and SAA at baseline and follow-up, is associated with short-term progression of atherosclerotic lesions in the carotid bifurcation.

	Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Study Design
We prospectively enrolled all consecutive patients who underwent duplex ultrasound investigations of the extracranial carotid arteries from March 2002 until March 2003 at our institution who were currently neurologically asymptomatic with respect to carotid obstructions. In the present study, we aimed to directly evaluate progression of atherosclerotic stenosis instead of measuring surrogate markers of carotid disease (such as intima-media thickness). Our ultrasound laboratory serves the departments of angiology and cardiology, and the main indications for performing carotid ultrasound were carotid bruits, known atherosclerotic disease in other vessel areas (coronary or peripheral artery disease), and patients scheduled for major cardiac surgery, thus meeting the requirements of a study sample of patients likely to exhibit carotid atherosclerosis and potentially progression of disease.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Patients who were initially asymptomatic with respect to carotid artery disease were eligible, with "asymptomatic" defined as the absence of transient ischemic attacks (TIA), amaurosis fugax, or stroke in patients’ recent history. Patients with a history of prior TIA or stroke were only eligible if the event occurred at least 12 months before inclusion and no residual or recurrent symptoms were identified by a neurologist. Exclusion criteria were patients’ refusal to participate in the study, symptomatic carotid artery disease that necessitated revascularization therapy, current infectious or inflammatory diseases, recent operations or endovascular interventions (within 14 days), patients after bilateral carotid occlusions, bilateral stent implantation, or bilateral carotid endarterectomy. The study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local review board and institutional ethics committee. All patients had to provide written informed consent.

During the study period, 1512 patients underwent a duplex ultrasound investigation of the extracranial carotid arteries. Of these, 149 were not eligible because of symptomatic carotid disease (n=89), current infections or recent operations (n=51), or refusal to participate (n=9). We enrolled 1363 eligible patients in the study. All study participants were white. Of these, 95 patients (7%) had to be excluded because of missing duplex ultrasound follow-up data (28 deaths; 67 refused the repeated duplex ultrasound investigation), which left 1268 patients for the final analysis. Clinical baseline characteristics (age, gender, frequency of atherothrombotic risk factors, cardiovascular comorbidities, and baseline degree of stenosis) of the 95 patients with missing duplex ultrasound follow-up data were not significantly different from the study sample (data not shown).

Study End Point
The primary study end point was unilateral or bilateral progression of carotid atherosclerosis in the extracranial internal carotid arteries (ICAs) from baseline to a follow-up investigation after 6 to 9 months. We used the following categories to quantify the degree of ICA stenosis at baseline and follow-up: 0% to 29% (carotid plaques), 30% to 49% (advanced plaques), 50% to 69% (moderate stenosis), 70% to 89% (high-grade stenosis), 90% to 99% (subocclusive stenosis), and 100% (occlusion). Progression of atherosclerotic disease was defined as an increase of the degree of stenosis by at least one category. Progression of stenosis in either one or both ICAs was considered indicative of progressive disease. The secondary objective was the change in peak systolic velocity in the internal carotid artery (PSV_ICA) from baseline to follow-up, as a continuous surrogate marker of progressive carotid disease.

Clinical Data
After patient identification at the ultrasound laboratory, medical history and data from physical examination were recorded, including the following variables: age, gender, body mass index, arterial hypertension, blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, smoking habits, hyperlipidemia, family history of atherosclerosis, history of myocardial infarction, angina pectoris (according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society [CCS] classification), peripheral artery disease (according to the Fontaine classification), history of prior cerebral accident, and current medication use. We screened for current infectious or inflammatory diseases by evaluating patients’ clinical history and current symptoms. Clinical suspicion for infectious or inflammatory diseases prompted further specific investigations according to clinical judgment. Completeness and accuracy of all data were ascertained by 2 independent observers.

Medication
Pharmacotherapy of patients with evidence of atherosclerosis followed a standard protocol: Patients received antithrombotic therapy with either acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg or clopidogrel 75 mg once daily. Patients with hyperlipidemia (LDL cholesterol >130 mg/dL) received inhibitors of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (statins).

Color-Coded Duplex Sonography and Grading of ICA Stenosis
Duplex examinations at baseline and during follow-up were performed on an Acuson 128 XP10 with a 7.5-MHz linear-array probe by experienced technical assistants who were supervised by 2 of the authors. Two independent investigators determined progression of carotid atherosclerosis on the basis of the baseline and follow-up duplex investigations. All duplex operators were blinded with respect to patients’ clinical data and laboratory findings. Duplex grading of the carotid stenosis was done as described previously by measurement of the peak systolic and end-diastolic velocities in the ICAs and common carotid arteries.^19–21 When these velocities are combined according to a recommended algorithm, the degree of ICA stenosis can be obtained in 6 categories, which correspond to NASCET (North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial) angiographic degree.^19–21 As a continuous surrogate marker of stenosis severity, we examined PSV_ICA, which is considered the most sensitive single flow parameter with respect to quantifying the degree of carotid stenosis.^19–21 The accuracy of our classification of the degree of stenosis with respect to angiography was assessed previously in our duplex laboratory in an independent cohort that included 1006 carotid arteries.²¹ With angiography as the "gold standard," positive and negative predictive values ranged from 70% to 98%, and interobserver agreement was excellent with respect to the absolute degree of stenosis (=0.83, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.88) and with respect to progression of the disease (=0.85, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.89).

Laboratory Data
Antecubital venous blood samples were obtained at baseline and follow-up visits. Measurements included HDL, LDL, and total cholesterol; HbA_1c; hs-CRP; SAA; and complete blood count. For determination of hs-CRP values, a high-sensitivity assay (N Latex CRP Mono, DADE Behring) with a detection level of 0.03 mg/dL and a coefficient of variation of 4.6% was used. SAA was measured by N Latex SAA (DADE Behring) with a detection level of 3.8 mg/L and a coefficient of variation of 6.4%. Treating physicians and ultrasonographers were blinded as to the hs-CRP and SAA values at baseline and follow-up.

Surveillance Protocol
Patients were scheduled for a follow-up visit 6 to 9 months after the initial presentation for clinical reexamination, neurological history with standard questionnaires, duplex examination, and blood sampling. Patients with clinical suspicion of neurological events during the follow-up period were further evaluated by a neurologist and underwent mandatory cranial computed tomography. If patients were symptomatic before the scheduled follow-up visit, which clinically prompted a duplex ultrasound investigation, the scheduled study follow-up ultrasound at 6 to 9 months was performed additionally and was considered for the study purposes to avoid any bias due to a shorter follow-up period.

Definitions
Diabetes mellitus was defined according to the 1997 criteria of the American Diabetes Association. Arterial hypertension was diagnosed in patients with resting blood pressure values above 140/90 mm Hg measured repetitively (at least twice) and was assumed to be present in patients taking antihypertensive drugs. Hyperlipidemia was defined as an elevation of LDL cholesterol above 130 mg/dL or total cholesterol above 200 mg/dL and was assumed to be present in all patients taking lipid-lowering medication. The diagnosis of peripheral artery disease was classified according to Fontaine.²² Coronary artery disease was recorded according to the CCS classification. History of myocardial infarction was defined according to the consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction.²³ Stroke was defined as a neurological deficit that persisted longer than 24 hours evaluated by a neurologist according to the modified Rankin stroke scale.²⁴ Mandatory cranial computed tomography or, if available, MRI was used for confirmation of the diagnosis.

Statistical Methods
Continuous data are presented as median and interquartile range (IQR; range from the 25th to the 75th percentile) or the total range. Discrete data are given as counts and percentages. We used ² tests, Mann Whitney U tests, exact tests, and Spearman correlation coefficients for univariate analyses, as appropriate. Partial correlation was used to assess the correlation between changes in hs-CRP/SAA and changes in the degree of stenosis as measured by PSV_ICA. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to assess the effect of inflammatory parameters on progression of the disease with adjustment for potential confounders. Hs-CRP and SAA were divided into quintiles before being entered into the models, to obtain clinically useful measures for the effect sizes. Separate models were calculated for hs-CRP and SAA at baseline and follow-up. Results of the logistic regression models are presented as the OR and 95% CI. Analyses that included the baseline degree of stenosis of both carotid arteries were adjusted for clustering by patient. Interaction was assessed with additive and multiplicative interaction terms, the linearity of the logit assumption was checked for continuous predictor variables, and an analysis of residuals was performed. Regression diagnostics and overall model fit were performed according to standard procedures.²⁵ A 2-sided probability value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Calculations were performed with Stata (release 8.0, Stata) and SPSS for Windows (version 10.0, SPSS Inc).

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Patient Characteristics
We included 1268 patients with complete baseline and follow-up data in the final analysis. The median age was 69 years (IQR 60 to 76 years), and 793 patients (63%) were male. Demographic data and clinical characteristics of the study sample are presented in Table 1. In 16% of the patients, a history of stroke was found without residual or recurrent symptoms; in these patients, the median time interval between prior stroke and inclusion in the study was 5.1 years (range 2.2 to 12.0 years).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 1. Demographic Data and Clinical Characteristics of the Study Sample (n=1268)

The inflammatory markers hs-CRP and SAA were significantly correlated at baseline (r=0.54, P<0.001). HbA_1c (r=0.13, P<0.001 and r=0.10, P<0.001) and body mass index (r=0.17, P<0.001 and r=0.07, P=0.009) were also significantly correlated both with hs-CRP and SAA, respectively. Furthermore, current smokers (P<0.001 and P=0.81), patients with arterial hypertension (P=0.052 and P=0.030), and patients with a history of myocardial infarction (P=0.008 and P=0.030), stroke (P=0.042 and P=0.016), or peripheral artery disease (P=0.010 and P=0.053) had higher hs-CRP and SAA values, respectively, at baseline. The baseline extent of carotid artery stenosis (in categories) and the PSV_ICA were not significantly associated with hs-CRP or SAA (all P>0.2), respectively.

Progression of Carotid Atherosclerosis
During the median follow-up period of 7.5 months (range 6 to 9 months), progression of carotid lesions was found in 103 (8.1%) of 1268 patients. Of these, 44 patients (3.5%) showed progression of a left ICA stenosis, 52 patients (4.1%) showed progression of a right ICA stenosis, and 6 patients (0.5%) had progressive lesions in both carotid arteries. In the 1268 patients, the change in PSV_ICA from baseline to follow-up was a median of 0.01 m/s (IQR –0.01 to 0.08 m/s); in patients with a progressive lesion, the median increase in PSV was 0.56 m/s (IQR 0.35 to 1.08 m/s). Eight patients (0.6%) developed a de novo occlusion of a carotid artery; each of these patients had an ipsilateral subocclusive stenosis (90% to 99%) at baseline. None of the patients underwent a carotid revascularization procedure during the follow-up period. Fifteen patients (1.2%) experienced a stroke during follow-up (4/103 patients [3.9%] with progressive lesions versus 11/1165 [0.9%] patients with stable disease; P=0.028). The associations between baseline clinical characteristics and risk for progression of the disease are given in Table 2; age, current smoking, history of prior stroke, and the baseline degree of stenosis were risk factors for disease progression.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 2. Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis Assessing Risk of Progression of Atherosclerotic Lesions Measured by Duplex Ultrasound in the Carotid Arteries of 1268 Patients From Baseline to Follow-Up (Median 7.5 Months, Range 6 To 9 Months)

Inflammatory Biomarkers and Disease Progression
Levels of hs-CRP and SAA at baseline and follow-up and the change from baseline to follow-up were significantly associated with progression of carotid atherosclerosis as a categorical measure (Figure 1). Furthermore, the changes in hs-CRP and SAA from baseline to follow-up were significantly but weakly correlated to the changes in PSV_ICA during the same time interval as a continuous measure of carotid stenosis progression (Figure 1).

View larger version (46K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Association between progression of carotid artery disease measured by duplex ultrasound and levels of inflammatory parameters at baseline and follow-up and changes from baseline to follow-up (median 7.5 months, range 6 to 9 months). Box plots show levels of hs-CRP and SAA in patients with and without progression of disease (by at least one category of degree of stenosis). Scatterplots show correlation between changes in hs-CRP and SAA from baseline to follow-up versus changes in PSVICA in ICA during same period as continuous ultrasound measure of carotid stenosis severity.

Because we were aware of several potential confounders, multivariable analyses were applied to adjust for baseline demographic and clinical variables. The levels of inflammatory parameters at baseline and follow-up were significantly associated with an increased risk for disease progression; adjusted ORs for increasing quintiles of hs-CRP and SAA compared with the lowest quintile are given in Figure 2. The logistic regression models were adjusted for age, gender, body mass index, HbA_1c, current smoking, arterial hypertension, LDL cholesterol, family history of cardiovascular disease, peripheral artery disease, history of myocardial infarction, history of stroke, serum creatinine, statin therapy, baseline degree of stenosis, and clustering by patient for the side of lesion (right/left) to account for the potential impact of bilateral progression. Adjustment for diabetes mellitus (yes versus no) instead of HbA_1c did not affect the observed ORs.

View larger version (39K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Forrest plots display adjusted ORs and 95% CIs for progression of atherosclerotic carotid lesions from baseline to follow-up investigation after median of 7.5 months (range 6 to 9 months) in 1268 patients. ORs are calculated by logistic regression analysis with adjustment for age, gender, body mass index, HbA1c, current smoking, arterial hypertension, LDL cholesterol, family history of cardiovascular disease, peripheral artery disease, history of myocardial infarction, history of stroke, serum creatinine, statin therapy, degree of stenosis, and clustering by patient for side of lesion (right/left). Separate models were calculated for hs-CRP (in quintiles) and SAA (in quintiles) at baseline and follow-up.

Partial correlation analyses (with adjustment for the same covariates listed above) confirmed a significant but weak correlation between the change in PSV_ICA from baseline to follow-up and the change in hs-CRP (r=0.061, P=0.021) and SAA (r=0.064, P=0.017), respectively.

We performed 2 sets of post hoc sensitivity analyses. First, the use of an even more conservative classification of carotid stenosis that categorized lesions as 0% to 49%, 50% to 69%, or 70% to 99% stenosed or as occluded revealed virtually identical associations between progression of disease and inflammatory biomarkers. Second, because we were aware of a potential difference between patients with and without prevalent cerebrovascular disease, we reanalyzed the data after excluding the 199 patients (16%) with a history of stroke. Univariate and multivariable analyses revealed significant associations between inflammatory parameters at baseline and follow-up with disease progression in 1069 patients without a history of stroke; the observed effect sizes were closely comparable to the results obtained in the entire patient sample of 1268 patients. Furthermore, testing for interaction between history of stroke, inflammatory parameters, and disease progression in the entire sample of 1268 patients by multiplicative interaction terms and log likelihood ratio tests revealed no significant effect modification.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
This is the first large, longitudinal study that unequivocally confirms a temporal correlation between inflammation and morphological features of rapidly progressive atherosclerosis. We found that increasing quintiles of the inflammatory biomarkers hs-CRP and SAA at baseline and follow-up predicted short-term progression of atherosclerotic lesions in the carotid arteries. Consistently, the change of inflammatory parameters correlated with the change of the degree of carotid stenosis during a 6- to 9-month period.

Progressive atherosclerotic plaques are associated with a markedly increased risk for clinical complications in virtually any segment of the arterial circulation.^2,26 These progressive or so-called vulnerable lesions are histologically heterogeneous and may be characterized by an inflammatory necrotic lipid core, fibrocalcified nodules, a thin fibrous cap of the atheroma, superficial erosion, thrombus apposition, or intraplaque hemorrhage.^26,27 Acute-phase reactants like C-reactive protein (CRP) and SAA provide an indirect measure of the cytokine-dependent inflammatory process in the arterial wall, which is a particularly key feature of the inflammatory activity that surrounds the necrotic lipid core.^5,26 However, CRP and SAA were described not merely as markers of atherosclerosis risk but also as directly promoting endothelial cell activation, adhesion molecule expression, and resultant endothelial dysfunction.^28–31 Accumulating epidemiological data have evolved that confirm that elevation of these parameters heralds clinically relevant atherothrombotic events.^7–18 Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether the extent of inflammation directly correlates with morphological features of atherosclerosis progression. The present observation provides considerable reassurance that progressive atherosclerotic lesions cause an inflammatory process that can be quantified by acute-phase reactants or vice versa, assuming a causal relationship, that inflammation triggers rapidly progressive atherosclerosis. It remains questionable whether elevated levels of inflammatory biomarkers uncover the presence of a single vulnerable lesion or identify a "vulnerable patient" exhibiting several coexisting high-risk lesions in different arterial segments. Actually, it appears more likely that elevation of hs-CRP and SAA indicates the systemic nature of progressive atherosclerotic disease,^26,32–35 which suggests that patients with enhanced inflammation are generally at high risk for progression of atherosclerotic disease and may exhibit multiple vulnerable lesions. The concept of early identification of vulnerable patients who are susceptible to cardiovascular adverse events seems appealing, and measurement of inflammatory biomarkers may be a potent adjunctive tool for this purpose.

The present findings suggest that inflammatory biomarkers indicate a risk for progressive disease rather than being associated with the baseline category of carotid stenosis. From the panel of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, only smoking was found to predict outcome, whereas diabetes, hyperlipidemia, arterial hypertension, and body mass index were not associated with morphological disease progression. This may suggest that the established risk factors are more important for the initiation and generalization of atherosclerosis and thus are strongly associated with the presence and extent of atherosclerosis,³⁶ whereas the inflammatory biomarkers specifically indicate rapidly progressive disease. Admittedly, the power of the study may have been inadequate to demonstrate such associations for the other traditional risk factors.

As an alternative to the degree of stenosis, intima-media thickness has been used in numerous studies to estimate progression of carotid disease. The implications of an increase in carotid intima-media thickness versus an increase in degree of stenosis may differ, particularly in a sample with prevalent atherosclerotic disease. Changes in the degree of stenosis appear to directly reflect progression of atherosclerosis, whereas intima-media thickness is considered only as a surrogate marker for carotid disease.

Acknowledging potential confounding factors, we performed 2 post hoc sensitivity analyses. Restricting the number of categories of the degree of carotid stenosis to 4 instead of 6 revealed almost identical findings. Similarly, excluding the 199 patients with prevalent strokes did not significantly affect the observed effect sizes. Taken together, the consistency of the findings with respect to different ultrasound methods of measurement, temporal coherence, biological gradients, and relatively large effect sizes in the entire patient sample and in patients without prevalent cerebrovascular disease argue against a chance finding. Furthermore, the present results are in line with numerous former cross-sectional studies.^37–40

Despite major advances in treatment of stroke, early identification and prevention of incident events remain crucial, because more than two thirds of all strokes occur without prior symptoms. Recently, Bertges et al² demonstrated that progression of carotid artery disease as indicated by duplex ultrasound investigations translates clinically into a substantially increased risk for ipsilateral neurological events. The present observations confirm these finding and suggest that in particular, patients with advanced carotid lesions and high levels of hs-CRP and SAA require close ultrasound surveillance and aggressive treatment of risk factors.

Study Limitations
We are aware of some methodological limitations of the present study. Potential selection bias inherent in a consecutive series of hospital-based duplex examinations cannot be ruled out, and the generalizability of these findings to younger individuals, other ethnicities and races, and unselected persons in the community remains to be determined.

Conclusions
These findings supply evidence of a close temporal correlation between inflammation and morphological features of rapidly progressive carotid atherosclerosis, which suggests that elevation or increase of the inflammatory biomarkers hs-CRP and SAA identifies the presence of active atherosclerotic disease.

	Acknowledgments

 
The authors are indebted to Angelika Haumer, Edyta Madroszkiewicz, Irene Liegler, Irene Mlekusch, Karin Pikesch, Sonja Fasching, and Sylvia Kaiser for excellent technical assistance.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Hankey GJ, Warlow CP. Treatment and secondary prevention of stroke: evidence, costs, and effects on individuals and populations. Lancet. 1999; 354: 1457–1463.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
   
2. Bertges DJ, Muluk V, Whittle J, Kelley M, MacPherson DS, Muluk SC. Relevance of carotid stenosis progression as a predictor of ischemic neurological outcomes. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163: 2285–2289.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
3. Lusis AJ. Atherosclerosis. Nature. 2000; 407: 233–241.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
   
4. Ross R. Atherosclerosis: an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 115–126.[Free Full Text]
   
5. Libby P, Ridker P, Maseri A. Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1135–1143.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
6. Glass CK, Witztum JL. Atherosclerosis: the road ahead. Cell. 2001; 104: 503–516.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
   
7. Ridker PM, Buring JE, Cook NR, Rifai N. C-reactive protein, the metabolic syndrome, and risk of incident cardiovascular events: an 8-year follow-up of 14719 initially healthy American women. Circulation. 2003; 107: 391–397.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
8. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Rose L, Buring JE, Cook NR. Comparison of C-reactive protein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in the prediction of first cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 1557–1565.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
9. Ridker PM, Cushman M, Stampfer MJ, Tracy RP, Hennekens CH. Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336: 973–979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
10. Tracy RP, Lemaitre RN, Psaty BM, Ives DG, Evans RW, Cushman M, Meilahn EN, Kuller LH. Relationship of C-reactive protein to risk of cardiovascular disease in the elderly: results from the Cardiovascular Health Study and the Rural Health Promotion Project. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997; 17: 1121–1127.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
11. Ridker PM, Hennekens CH, Buring JE, Rifai N. C-reactive protein and other markers of inflammation in the prediction of cardiovascular disease in women. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 836–843.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
12. Koenig W, Sund M, Frolich M, Fischer HG, Lowel H, Dohring A, Hutchinson WL, Pepys MB. C-reactive protein, a sensitive marker of inflammation, predicts future risk of coronary heart disease in initially healthy middle-aged men: results from the MONICA (Monitoring Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease) Augsburg Cohort Study, 1984 to 1992. Circulation. 1999; 99: 237–242.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
13. Danesh J, Whincup P, Walker M, Lennon L, Thompson A, Appleby P, Gallimore JR, Pepys MB. Low grade inflammation and coronary heart disease: prospective study and updated meta-analyses. BMJ. 2000; 321: 199–204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
14. Rost NS, Wolf PA, Kase CS, Kelly-Hayes M, Silbershatz H, Massaro JM, D’Agostino RB, Franzblau C, Wilson PW. Plasma concentration of C-reactive protein and risk of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attacks: the Framingham Study. Stroke. 2001; 32: 2575–2579.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
15. Ford ES, Giles WH. Serum C-reactive protein and self-reported stroke: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination survey. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20: 1052–1056.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
16. Albert CM, Ma J, Rifai N, Stampfer MJ, Ridker PM. Prospective study of C-reactive protein, homocysteine, and plasma lipid levels as predictors of sudden cardiac death. Circulation. 2002; 105: 2595–2599.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
17. Ridker PM, Stampfer MJ, Rifai N. Novel risk factors for systemic atherosclerosis: a comparison of C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, homocysteine, lipoprotein(a), and standard cholesterol screening as predictors of peripheral arterial disease. JAMA. 2001; 285: 2481–2485.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
18. Schillinger M, Exner M, Amighi J, Mlekusch W, Sabeti S, Rumpold H, Wagner O, Minar E. Joint effects of C-reactive protein and glycated hemoglobin in predicting future cardiovascular events in patients with advanced atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2003; 108: 2323–2328.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
19. Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL, Alexandrov AV, Baker JD, Blum EI, Carroll BA, Eliasziw M, Gocke J, Hertzberg BS, Katanick S, Needleman L, Pellerito J, Polak JF, Rholl KS, Wooster DL, Zierler RE. Carotid artery stenosis: gray-scale and Doppler US diagnosis–Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference. Radiology. 2003; 229: 340–346.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
20. Nicolaides AN, Shifrin EG, Bradbury A, Dhanjil S, Griffin M, Belcaro G, Williams M. Angiographic and duplex grading of internal carotid stenosis: can we overcome the confusion? J Endovasc Surg. 1996; 3: 158–165.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
21. Sabeti S, Schillinger M, Mlekusch W, Willfort A, Haumer M, Nachtmann T, Mullner M, Lang W, Ahmadi R, Minar E. Duplex sonography for quantification of internal carotid artery stenosis: a comparative analysis of different flow velocity thresholds. Radiology. 2004; 232: 431–439.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
22. Dormandy JA, Rutherford B. Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) TASC Working Group. TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC). J Vasc Surg. 2000; 31: S1–S296.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
23. Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E, Bassand JP. Myocardial infarction redefined: a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 959–969.[Free Full Text]
    
24. Brott T, Adams HP, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989; 20: 864–870.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
25. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, eds. Applied Logistic Regression. 1st ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1989: 135–175.
    
26. Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, Casscells SW, Litovsky S, Rumberger J, Badimon JJ, Stefanadis C, Moreno P, Pasterkamp G, Fayad Z, Stone PH, Waxman S, Raggi P, Madjid M, Zarrabi A, Burke A, Yuan C, Fitzgerald PJ, Siscovick DS, de Korte CL, Aikawa M, Juhani Airaksinen KE, Assmann G, Becker CR, Chesebro JH, Farb A, Galis ZS, Jackson C, Jang IK, Koenig W, Lodder RA, March K, Demirovic J, Navab M, Priori SG, Rekhter MD, Bahr R, Grundy SM, Mehran R, Colombo A, Boerwinkle E, Ballantyne C, Insull W Jr, Schwartz RS, Vogel R, Serruys PW, Hansson GK, Faxon DP, Kaul S, Drexler H, Greenland P, Muller JE, Virmani R, Ridker PM, Zipes DP, Shah PK, Willerson JT. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: part I. Circulation. 2003; 108: 1664–1672.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
27. Kolodgie FD, Gold HK, Burke AP, Fowler DR, Kruth HS, Weber DK, Farb A, Guerrero LJ, Hayase M, Kutys R, Narula J, Finn AV, Virmani R. Intraplaque hemorrhage and progression of coronary atheroma. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349: 2285–2287.[Free Full Text]
    
28. Pasceri V, Willerson JT, Yeh ET. Direct proinflammatory effect of C-reactive protein on human endothelial cells. Circulation. 2000; 102: 2165–2168.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
29. Devaraj S, Xu DY, Jialal I. C-reactive protein increases plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression and activity in human aortic endothelial cells: implications for the metabolic syndrome and atherothrombosis. Circulation. 2003; 107: 398–404.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
30. Verma S, Li SH, Badiwala MV, Weisel RD, Fedak PW, Li RK, Dhillon B, Mickle DA. Endothelin antagonism and interleukin-6 inhibition attenuate the proatherogenic effects of C-reactive protein. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1890–1896.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
31. Verma S, Wang CH, Li SH, Dumont AS, Fedak PW, Badiwala MV, Dhillon B, Weisel RD, Li RK, Mickle DA, Stewart DJ. A self-fulfilling prophecy: C-reactive protein attenuates nitric oxide production and inhibits angiogenesis. Circulation. 2002; 106: 913–919.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
32. Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, Casscells SW, Litovsky S, Rumberger J, Badimon JJ, Stefanadis C, Moreno P, Pasterkamp G, Fayad Z, Stone PH, Waxman S, Raggi P, Madjid M, Zarrabi A, Burke A, Yuan C, Fitzgerald PJ, Siscovick DS, de Korte CL, Aikawa M, Airaksinen KE, Assmann G, Becker CR, Chesebro JH, Farb A, Galis ZS, Jackson C, Jang IK, Koenig W, Lodder RA, March K, Demirovic J, Navab M, Priori SG, Rekhter MD, Bahr R, Grundy SM, Mehran R, Colombo A, Boerwinkle E, Ballantyne C, Insull W Jr, Schwartz RS, Vogel R, Serruys PW, Hansson GK, Faxon DP, Kaul S, Drexler H, Greenland P, Muller JE, Virmani R, Ridker PM, Zipes DP, Shah PK, Willerson JT. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: part II. Circulation. 2003; 108: 1172–1178.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
33. Burke AP, Farb A, Malcom GT, Liang YH, Smialek J, Virmani R. Coronary risk factors and plaque morphology in men with coronary disease who died suddenly. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336: 1276–1282.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
34. Goldstein JA, Demetriou D, Grines CL, Pica M, Shoukjeh M, O’Neill WW. Multiple complex coronary plaques in patients with acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 915–922.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
35. Buffon A, Biasucci LM, Liuzzo G, D’Onofrio G, Crea F, Maseri A. Widespread coronary inflammation in unstable angina. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 5–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
36. Danesh J, Wheeler JG, Hirschfeld G, Eda S, Eiriksdottir G, Rumpley A, Lowe GD, Pepys MB, Gudnason V. C-reactive protein and other circulating markers of inflammation in the prediction of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350: 1387–1397.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
37. Magyar MT, Szikszai Z, Balla J, Valikovics A, Kappelmayer J, Imre S, Balla G, Jeney V, Csiba L, Bereczki D. Early-onset carotid atherosclerosis is associated with increased intima-media thickness and elevated serum levels of inflammatory markers. Stroke. 2003; 34: 58–63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
38. Blackburn R, Giral P, Bruckert E, Andre JM, Gonbert S, Bernard M, Chapman MJ, Turpin G. Elevated C-reactive protein constitutes an independent predictor of advanced carotid plaques in dyslipidemic subjects. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21: 1962–1968.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
39. Willeit J, Kiechl S, Oberhollenzer F, Rungger G, Egger G, Bonora E, Mitterer M, Muggeo M. Distinct risk profiles of early and advanced atherosclerosis: prospective results from the Bruneck Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20: 529–537.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
40. Wang TJ, Nam BH, Wilson PW, Wolf PA, Levy D, Polak JF, D’Agostino RB, O’Donnell CJ. Association of C-reactive protein with carotid atherosclerosis in men and women: the Framingham Heart Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 22: 1662–1667.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    

Related Article:

Issue Highlights
Circulation 2005 111: 2151. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Debing, E. Peeters, C. Demanet, M. De Waele, and P. Van den Brande Markers of Inflammation in Patients With Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Case-Control Study Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, May 1, 2008; 42(2): 122 - 127. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Sander, C. Schulze Horn, C. Briesenick, and D. Sander High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Is Independently Associated With Early Carotid Artery Progression in Women But Not in Men: The INVADE Study Stroke, November 1, 2007; 38(11): 2881 - 2886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Sabeti, O. Schlager, M. Exner, W. Mlekusch, J. Amighi, P. Dick, G. Maurer, K. Huber, R. Koppensteiner, O. Wagner, et al. Progression of Carotid Stenosis Detected by Duplex Ultrasonography Predicts Adverse Outcomes in Cardiovascular High-Risk Patients Stroke, November 1, 2007; 38(11): 2887 - 2894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Groschel, U. Ernemann, J. Larsen, M. Knauth, F. Schmidt, J. Artschwager, and A. Kastrup Preprocedural C-Reactive Protein Levels Predict Stroke and Death in Patients Undergoing Carotid Stenting AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2007; 28(9): 1743 - 1746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. C. Steffens, K. M. Stechuchak, E. Z. Oddone, W. Mlekusch, I. Mlekusch, and M. Schillinger How Asymptomatic Is Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis? Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 317 - 319. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Ostling, B. Hedblad, G. Berglund, and I. Goncalves Increased Echolucency of Carotid Plaques in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2074 - 2078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M. Ridker C-Reactive Protein and the Prediction of Cardiovascular Events Among Those at Intermediate Risk: Moving an Inflammatory Hypothesis Toward Consensus J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 29, 2007; 49(21): 2129 - 2138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Schlager, M. Exner, W. Mlekusch, S. Sabeti, J. Amighi, P. Dick, O. Wagner, R. Koppensteiner, E. Minar, and M. Schillinger C-Reactive Protein Predicts Future Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Carotid Stenosis Stroke, April 1, 2007; 38(4): 1263 - 1268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Schmidt, H. Schmidt, M. Pichler, C. Enzinger, K. Petrovic, K. Niederkorn, S. Horner, S. Ropele, N. Watzinger, M. Schumacher, et al. C-Reactive Protein, Carotid Atherosclerosis, and Cerebral Small-Vessel Disease: Results of the Austrian Stroke Prevention Study Stroke, December 1, 2006; 37(12): 2910 - 2916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Eldrup, M.-L. M. Gronholdt, H. Sillesen, and B. G. Nordestgaard Elevated Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Associated With Stroke or Cardiovascular Death in Patients With Carotid Stenosis Circulation, October 24, 2006; 114(17): 1847 - 1854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Kontush and M. J. Chapman Functionally Defective High-Density Lipoprotein: A New Therapeutic Target at the Crossroads of Dyslipidemia, Inflammation, and Atherosclerosis Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2006; 58(3): 342 - 374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Schillinger, W. Kluger, M. Exner, W. Mlekusch, S. Sabeti, J. Amighi, O. Wagner, E. Minar, and M. Schillinger Dental and Periodontal Status and Risk for Progression of Carotid Atherosclerosis: The Inflammation and Carotid Artery Risk for Atherosclerosis Study Dental Substudy Stroke, September 1, 2006; 37(9): 2271 - 2276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Crouse III Thematic review series: Patient-Oriented Research. Imaging atherosclerosis: state of the art J. Lipid Res., August 1, 2006; 47(8): 1677 - 1699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Stoll and M. Bendszus Inflammation and Atherosclerosis: Novel Insights Into Plaque Formation and Destabilization Stroke, July 1, 2006; 37(7): 1923 - 1932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Tanne, M. Benderly, U. Goldbourt, M. Haim, A. Tenenbaum, E. Z. Fisman, Z. Matas, Y. Adler, R. Zimmlichman, and S. Behar C-Reactive Protein as a Predictor of Incident Ischemic Stroke Among Patients With Preexisting Cardiovascular Disease Stroke, July 1, 2006; 37(7): 1720 - 1724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Exner, E. Minar, W. Mlekusch, S. Sabeti, J. Amighi, W. Lalouschek, G. Maurer, C. Bieglmayer, H. Kieweg, O. Wagner, et al. Myeloperoxidase Predicts Progression of Carotid Stenosis in States of Low High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 6, 2006; 47(11): 2212 - 2218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

V. Aboyans, M. H. Criqui, J. O. Denenberg, J. D. Knoke, P. M Ridker, and A. Fronek Risk Factors for Progression of Peripheral Arterial Disease in Large and Small Vessels Circulation, June 6, 2006; 113(22): 2623 - 2629. [Abstract] [Full T