Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2004;110:2673-2677
Published online before print August 16, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000139842.15651.B2
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
110/17/2673    most recent
01.CIR.0000139842.15651.B2v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deb, A.
Right arrow Articles by Caplice, N. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Deb, A.
Right arrow Articles by Caplice, N. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stem Cells
Related Collections
Right arrow Smooth muscle proliferation and differentiation
Right arrow Other Vascular biology

(Circulation. 2004;110:2673-2677.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Molecular Cardiology

Integrin Profile and In Vivo Homing of Human Smooth Muscle Progenitor Cells

Arjun Deb, MD*; Kimberly A. Skelding, MD*; Shaohua Wang, MD; Margo Reeder, BS; David Simper, MD; Noel M. Caplice, MD, PhD

From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Molecular Medicine Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.

Correspondence to Noel M. Caplice MD, PhD, Mayo Clinic, GU 1801, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail caplice.noel{at}mayo.edu

Received October 20, 2003; de novo received June 9, 2004; revision received June 23, 2004; accepted June 23, 2004.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Recently, we identified circulating smooth muscle progenitor cells (SPCs) in human peripheral blood. The integrin profile of such progenitors is currently unknown and may affect their in vivo homing characteristics. In this study, we determined the integrin profile of vascular progenitors and SPC adhesion to extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins in vitro and in vivo.

Methods and Results— SPCs and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) were isolated from peripheral blood of healthy human subjects, and expression of surface integrins and adhesion to several vascular ECM proteins were determined. Homing of SPCs in vivo to specific ECM protein was determined by intracoronary infusion of fluorescent SPCs into porcine coronary arteries containing a fibronectin-coated mesh stent. SPCs had high expression of ß1 integrin, moderate expression of {alpha}1, low levels of {alpha}vß3, and did not express {alpha}vß5, ß2, {alpha}2ß1, or {alpha}4ß1 integrins. In contrast, EPCs had high expression of {alpha}2ß1, {alpha}vß3, {alpha}vß5, ß1, and {alpha}1 and minimal expression of {alpha}4ß1. Moreover, SPCs showed increased adherence to fibronectin and collagen type I compared with vitronectin, consistent with their integrin profile, and demonstrated a similar degree of in vivo attachment to fibronectin-coated mesh.

Conclusions— These data for the first time show a spectrum of integrin expression on vascular progenitors and suggest the potential importance of integrins in mediating adherence of SPCs to specific ECM both in vitro and in vivo.


Key Words: integrins • muscle, smooth • stem cells • extracellular matrix


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Emerging experimental evidence suggests that circulating smooth muscle progenitor cells (SPCs) may participate in atherosclerosis biology.1 Currently, there are at least 2 broad classes of molecules that may contribute to maintenance of vascular progenitor cells in the circulation.2 The first group consists of factors with the capacity to stimulate growth, survival, and differentiation of progenitor cells.3 The second group comprises heterodimeric surface adhesion molecules (integrins) known to support physical association between circulating progenitor cells and vascular extracellular matrix (ECM).4

Recently, we described the existence of SPCs in human peripheral blood5 and have also shown that bone marrow–derived smooth muscle cells are highly enriched in the intima of human atherosclerotic vessels.6 Understanding the homing, adhesion, and recruitment characteristics of SPCs may have significant implications for understanding basic mechanisms of atherogenesis and for development of novel therapeutics to treat vascular disease. The full integrin profile of human SPCs and the ECM proteins that allow the best adhesion platform for these cells are currently unknown. Moreover, it remains unclear whether ECM proteins can provide a receptive niche to capture SPCs in vivo.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Isolation and Identification of SPCs and Endothelial Progenitor Cells
SPCs and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) were isolated from peripheral blood of healthy human subjects, expanded in culture, and immunophenotyped as described previously.5 The mononuclear cell population from which EPCs and SPCs are usually derived was also assayed by flow cytometry.7

Analysis of Cell-Surface Integrins of SPCs and EPCs
Fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis was performed to identify the following cell-surface integrins on SPCs and EPCs (passages 2 to 6): {alpha}vß3, {alpha}vß5, {alpha}4ß1, ß1, ß2, {alpha}1, {alpha}2ß1; Chemicon). Human vascular smooth muscle cells, human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), and freshly isolated mononuclear cells, respectively, were used as cell controls.

In Vitro Adhesion of SPCs and EPCs to ECM Proteins
The adhesion of SPCs to ECM such as fibronectin, collagen type 1 (COLL), vitronectin (VN), and fibrin was analyzed on coated 24-well plates in vitro (Calbiochem). SPCs were stained with cell tracker green (CTG; 1 µL/4 mL media; Molecular Probes) and plated at a density of 2x105 cells/well. After 1 hour of incubation at 37°C in the presence or absence of serum-free EBM-2 media containing magnesium and calcium, unattached cells were washed with PBS, and the number of attached cells was estimated by measuring the fluorescence of each well. In separate experiments, the number of attached SPCs was determined by hemocytometer counting as described previously.5 Adhesion of cells in the presence or absence of BSA (1%) precoating of wells was also determined.

In Vitro ECM Adhesion and In Vivo Homing of SPCs to Fibronectin-Coated Mesh Stent
We have previously described a stainless steel mesh stent that acts as an ideal cell attachment platform when coated with ECM protein.8 This mesh was coated with several ECM proteins including fibronectin, COLL, and VN. SPCs stained with CTG were seeded at a density of 2.5x105/cm2 on the mesh in vitro. After 1 hour, the mesh was washed with PBS, cells were gently trypsinized off the mesh, and the fluorescence of the lifted cells was determined.

For in vivo fluorescence, a fibronectin-coated mesh stent was inserted into the left circumflex coronary artery of normal pigs, followed by intracoronary injection of 2x106 CTG-labeled SPCs (n=3). Stents were explanted 24 hours later, and fluorescence of attached cells on the mesh stent was determined as described for in vitro studies.

Data and Statistical Analysis
All experiments were performed in triplicate, and ANOVA was used to determine statistically significant differences in adhesion between the different ECMs. A P<0.05 was determined as statistically significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Integrin Profile of EPCs and SPCs
SPCs showed high expression of ß1 integrin, moderate expression of {alpha}1, low levels of {alpha}vß3, and absence of {alpha}vß5, ß2, {alpha}2ß1, and {alpha}4ß1 integrins (Figure 1). Moreover, apart from ß1 integrin expression on SPCs, all other integrins ({alpha}1, {alpha}4ß1, {alpha}vß3, and {alpha}vß5) were more highly expressed on human vascular smooth muscle cells grown under identical culture conditions. In contrast, EPCs had high expression of {alpha}2ß1, {alpha}vß3, {alpha}vß5, ß1, and {alpha}1 and minimal expression of {alpha}4ß1 (Figure 1), with similar levels of these integrins seen on HUVECs with the exception of {alpha}4ß1, which was more highly expressed on HUVECs (Figure 1). Finally, mononuclear cells were positive for ß2 integrin expression in contrast to all other cells analyzed (Figure 1).



View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Flow cytometry analysis of surface integrin expression of SPCs, EPCs, and mononuclear cells (MNC) compared with differentiated vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) and HUVEC populations. Experiments were performed for each antibody on at least 3 separate occasions. In each case, filled histogram indicates isotype-matched IgG control antibody.

Fibrin Adhesion Properties of SPCs and EPCs
We determined whether the differential expression of integrins on EPCs and SPCs was reflected in the respective binding properties of these cells to fibrin, which contains a mixture of vascular ECM components. In all experiments, binding of progenitor cells to ECM proteins was unaffected by precoating of wells with BSA. We initially chose fibrin because it plays a central role in atherothrombosis, and freshly formed clot may serve as a niche for incorporation of circulating vascular progenitors.9 After a 1-hour adhesion assay, EPCs showed 2-fold greater adherence to fibrin than SPCs (Figures 2A and 2B). Antibody to {alpha}vß3 integrin decreased EPC adhesion to fibrin by {approx}20% compared with isotype IgG control (P<0.05; Figure 2C). Antibodies to other integrins (including ß1) did not affect binding of EPCs to fibrin (Figure 2C). In contrast, antibodies to ß1 integrin significantly decreased SPC adhesion to fibrin by {approx}35% (P<0.05; Figure 2C). Adhesion to fibrin was not affected by other antibodies to integrins known to be expressed on SPCs, such as {alpha}5ß1 and {alpha}1 (data not shown).



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Adhesion properties of SPCs and EPCs to various ECMs and mesh stent in vitro and in vivo. A, Immunofluorescence staining of SPCs and EPCs for smooth muscle (SM) and endothelial lineage markers. HC indicates heavy chain; VECAD, vascular endothelial cadherin. B, EPCs show greater binding to fibrin than SPCs. F.U. indicates fluorescence units. C, {alpha}vß3 (open bars) and ß1 (hatched bars) antibodies decrease EPC and SPC binding, respectively, to fibrin compared with isotype-matched IgG control antibodies (solid bars). Ctrl indicates control. D, Adhesion properties of SPCs to various ECM proteins, demonstrating strongest and weakest adhesion to fibronectin (FN) and VN, respectively. E, SPC adhesion to fibronectin (FN) matrix in presence of various integrin antibodies ({alpha}1, ß1, and {alpha}11) compared with IgG control (Ctrl) antibody. F through J, Successful adhesion of SPC to fibronectin-coated mesh stent in vivo compared with in vitro adhesion to similar fibronectin-coated mesh (E through G). G, Confocal microscopy of mesh stent after explantation from porcine coronary artery shows CTG-labeled SPC (green) within mesh framework (100x). H, Same cell at high magnification (400x), staining positive for CTG (upper panel) and Hoechst (blue; lower panel). I and J, SPCs staining positive for CTG and {alpha}-smooth muscle actin ({alpha}SMA; 200x). Experiments in all cases were performed on at least 3 separate occasions. For in vitro assays, each individual experiment was performed in triplicate. Adhesion experiments were performed after preblocking with BSA.

In Vitro ECM Adhesion and In Vivo Homing of SPCs to Fibronectin-Coated Mesh
We next determined in vitro adhesion of SPCs to a mesh coated with specific vascular ECM proteins, such as COLL, fibronectin, and VN. SPCs showed increased adherence to fibronectin and COLL compared with VN, consistent with the integrin profile described for these cells (Figure 2D). In a separate series of experiments, adhesion of SPCs to fibronectin was determined in the presence of antibodies to {alpha}1 and ß1 integrins or control IgG. All integrin antibodies decreased SPC adhesion to fibronectin compared with IgG control antibody, with the combination of both {alpha}1 and ß1 antibodies being most effective (decreased adhesion by {approx}85%; Figure 2E; P<0.01). Moreover, analysis of fibronectin-coated mesh stents placed in the porcine coronary artery 24 hours after intracoronary infusion of 2x106 SPCs demonstrated significant in vivo SPC attachment to this mesh stent, as was also observed in vitro (Figure 2, F through J). Approximately 40% of incubated SPCs attached to the fibronectin-coated mesh stent in vitro, whereas {approx}10% of injected SPCs attached to the mesh stent in vivo.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In this study, we show a distinct surface integrin expression profile in human SPCs compared with EPCs and report for the first time in vivo SPC adhesion to specific ECM protein within the vasculature. These data have implications for understanding in vivo SPC biology and for the development of novel cellular targets in the vessel wall. Moreover, this study provides a window for potential future strategies aimed at device cell interfacing to achieve therapeutic effect.

The components of the vasculature targeted by SPC homing are currently unknown. Such homing may involve exit of progenitor cells from the circulation, with attachment to ECM proteins and incorporation into vascular tissue.1 Integrins are known to play a key role in mediating anchorage between progenitor and vascular cells and ECM, potentiating cell differentiation, cell migration, and proliferation.4,10 In vitro matrix models suggest different vascular cells share several integrins with potentially overlapping matrix-binding characteristics, and indeed, the constituents of the matrix environment are a strong determinant of specific integrin interaction.

In the present study, SPCs expressed high levels of ß1 and {alpha}1 integrins, both of which are known to facilitate fibronectin interfacing,11 and it is possible these integrins are also significant determinants of SPC–fibronectin interaction. Indeed, our SPC binding data support this concept, with significant inhibition of SPC-fibronectin binding by combined antibodies to {alpha}1 and ß1 integrins. In contrast, fibrin binding of EPCs that expressed much less ß1 integrin was not inhibited by ß1 antibody. SPCs lacked significant {alpha}vß3 and {alpha}vß5 integrins, which have been shown to play a key role in angiogenesis, whereas EPCs known to participate in postnatal neovascularization strongly expressed these integrins. Moreover, the {alpha}2ß1 integrin, which is a significant mediator of collagen binding,12 was expressed at high levels in EPCs but absent in SPCs. Together, these data suggest differential integrin-matrix binding between SPCs and EPCs.

Although SPC adherence to fibrin was more potent than to fibronectin, the heterogeneous nature of fibrin (which consists of a large number of different proteins) and its prothrombotic potential makes interpretation of this integrin-matrix interaction in vivo much more complex. Given the in vivo SPC adhesion to fibronectin-coated mesh stent in the present study, it is tempting to speculate whether fibronectin within the diseased vessel wall may also provide a receptive niche for SPC attachment. Atherosclerotic plaques are prone to fissure with exposure of underlying fibronectin, and it is conceivable that homing of SPCs to fibronectin-rich atherosclerotic lesions may be amenable to pharmacological manipulation.

In summary, we report distinct integrin profiles for human SPCs and EPCs and demonstrate differences in ECM attachment of these cells that may have in vivo biological relevance. Further investigation will be necessary to determine whether homing properties of vascular progenitors can be altered pharmacologically or genetically by targeted inhibition or potentiation of integrin–matrix interactions.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health (HL66958-NMC) and the Mayo Foundation. We thank Toni Higgins for her assistance in preparing this manuscript.


*    Footnotes
 
*Drs Deb and Skelding contributed equally to this article. Back


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Sata M, Saiura A, Kunisato A, Tojo A, Okada S, Tokuhisa T, Hirai H, Makuuchi M, Hirata Y, Nagai R. Hematopoietic stem cells differentiate into vascular cells that participate in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Nat Med. 2002; 8: 403–409.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Levesque JP, Simmons PJ. Cytoskeleton and integrin-mediated adhesion signaling in human CD34+ hemopoietic progenitor cells. Exp Hematol. 1999; 27: 579–586.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Hirschi K, Goodell M. Common origins of blood and blood vessels in adults? Differentiation. 2001; 68: 186–192.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Solanilla A, Grosset C, Duchez P, Legembre P, Pitard V, Dupouy M, Belloc F, Viallard JF, Reiffers J, Boiron JM, Coulombel L, Ripoche J. Flt3-ligand induces adhesion of haematopoietic progenitor cells via a very late antigen (VLA)-4– and VLA-5–dependent mechanism. Br J Haematol. 2003; 120: 782–786.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Simper D, Stalboerger PG, Panetta CJ, Wang S, Caplice NM. Smooth muscle progenitor cells in human blood. Circulation. 2002; 106: 1199–1204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Caplice NM, Bunch TJ, Stalboerger PG, Wang S, Simper D, Miller DV, Russell SJ, Litzow MR, Edwards WD. Smooth muscle cells in human coronary atherosclerosis can originate from cells administered at marrow transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100: 4754–4759.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Schmid I, Uittenbogaart CH, Giorgi JV. A gentle fixation and permeabilization method for combined cell surface and intracellular staining with improved precision in DNA quantification. Cytometry. 1991; 12: 279–285.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Panetta CJ, Miyauchi K, Berry D, Simari RD, Holmes DR, Schwartz RS, Caplice NM. A tissue-engineered stent for cell-based vascular gene transfer. Hum Gene Ther. 2002; 13: 433–441.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Carmeliet P. Biomedicine: clotting factors build blood vessels. Science. 2001; 293: 1602–1604.[Free Full Text]
  10. Hynes RO. Integrins: versatility, modulation, and signaling in cell adhesion. Cell. 1992; 69: 11–25.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Fogerty FJ, Akiyama SK, Yamada KM, Mosher DF. Inhibition of binding of fibronectin to matrix assembly sites by anti-integrin (alpha 5 beta 1) antibodies. J Cell Biol. 1990; 111: 699–708.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Davis GE, Camarillo CW. An alpha 2 beta 1 integrin–dependent pinocytic mechanism involving intracellular vacuole formation and coalescence regulates capillary lumen and tube formation in three-dimensional collagen matrix. Exp Cell Res. 1996; 224: 39–51.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
110/17/2673    most recent
01.CIR.0000139842.15651.B2v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deb, A.
Right arrow Articles by Caplice, N. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Deb, A.
Right arrow Articles by Caplice, N. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stem Cells
Related Collections
Right arrow Smooth muscle proliferation and differentiation
Right arrow Other Vascular biology