| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2004;110:2417-2423.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Hypertension |
From the Department of Social Medicine (D.A.L., J.S., S.E., G.D.S.), University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; School of Social Science (J.M.N.), University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; and School of Population Health (J.M.N., G.M.W.), University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Correspondence to Dr D.A. Lawlor, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Rd, Bristol, BS8 2PR, UK. E-mail d.a.lawlor{at}bristol.ac.uk
Received October 2, 2003; de novo received March 3, 2004; revision received May 20, 2004; accepted June 10, 2004.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Information from 3864 children who were followed up prospectively from their mothers first antenatal clinic assessment was used. Maternal age, body mass index, and smoking during pregnancy were all positively associated with offspring systolic blood pressure at 5 years of age. The systolic blood pressure of children whose mothers had smoked throughout pregnancy was on average 0.92 mm Hg (95% CI 0.17 to 1.68) greater than that of children whose mothers had never smoked, after full adjustment. Children who had been breast fed until at least 6 months had lower systolic blood pressure than those who were breast fed for a shorter duration. Paternal body mass index and childs weight, height, and body mass index were all positively associated with blood pressure at age 5.
Conclusions Because childhood blood pressure tracks into adulthood, interventions aimed at early life risk factors, such as quitting smoking during pregnancy, breast feeding, and prevention of obesity in all family members, may be important for reducing the population distribution of blood pressure and thus cardiovascular disease risk.
Key Words: blood pressure child etiology smoking breast feeding
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although treatment of high blood pressure is beneficial,10 treated and well-controlled hypertensive adults still have a substantial excess mortality rate and reduced survival rates compared with normotensive people,11 which makes identification of the means of preventing hypertension in earlier life an important objective. Available studies on the determinants of blood pressure in childhood have been small, some have suboptimal cross-sectional designs, and they have produced inconsistent results.1215 The aim of the present study was to assess the influence of parental, intrauterine, and childhood factors on blood pressure at 5 years of age in a large cohort of Australian children who have been followed up since their mothers first antenatal clinic visit.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Measurements
Birth weight data were abstracted directly from obstetric records, and continuous estimates of birth length and head circumference were made from measurements categorized in 8 groups in these records. Ethnicity, maternal height, past obstetric history, marital status, maternal education, maternal weight at first antenatal visit, and maternal estimate of her own prepregnancy weight and paternal height and weight were abstracted from the obstetric records or interview at the first clinic visit. Maternal smoking status was recorded at 3 stages (prepregnancy, first antenatal visit, and during the last trimester); women were grouped into those who quit smoking during pregnancy, smoked throughout pregnancy, or never smoked. The babys weight and breast-feeding status at 6 months were obtained from the mothers report. Household income at birth, 6 months, and 5 years was used to categorize offspring into 3 categories of early life income: consistently poor (below average income at all 3 periods), largely middle income, or high income (above-average income at all 3 periods).
At 5 years, blood pressure was measured as the mean of 2 readings taken 5 minutes apart with a digital sphygmomanometer and appropriate cuff, with the child seated and at rest. The average of 2 measures of the childs weight, lightly clothed, with a scale accurate to 0.2 kg, was used in all analyses. Height was measured with a portable stadiometer, and triceps skinfold thickness was measured with standard skin calipers.
Statistical Analysis
Students t test and
2 tests were used to compare characteristics of those who did and did not attend the examinations at age 5. Blood pressure measurements were adjusted for gender and age, using the childs exact age in days at examination. Multiple linear regression was used to assess the associations of exposures with systolic blood pressure at age 5, with adjustment for potential confounding and mediating factors. To examine possible nonlinear associations, graphs of the relationships between exposures and outcomes were plotted, and quadratic terms, for continuous variables, were included in regression models. F-tests were used to examine interactions between the effects of size at birth and size at age 5 on blood pressure. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were correlated (Pearsons correlation coefficient 0.56 [95% CI 0.54 to 0.58], and there were no substantive differences between the associations with systolic blood pressure presented in this report and similar associations with diastolic blood pressure (data not presented).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The mean (SD) systolic blood pressure of participating children was 104.0 (9.7) mm Hg. Table 2 shows age- and gender-adjusted linear regression coefficients for each of the exposures on systolic blood pressure at age 5.
|
Maternal Factors
Table 3 shows associations between maternal characteristics and offspring blood pressure with adjustment for potential confounding and mediating factors. Only children with complete data on all covariates were included in analyses; blood pressure did not differ between those with and those without complete data. Maternal age, body mass index, height, and smoking throughout pregnancy were all independently and positively associated with offspring blood pressure. The positive association with maternal age was present even when the analyses were restricted to first births: 0.50 (95% CI 0.08 to 1.08) mm Hg per increase in 1 SD of maternal age, although this was slightly weaker than the association among all other women (0.95 [95% CI 0.53 to 1.36]; P for difference in association between those who were first-born compared with all others=0.21).
|
A comparison of women who quit smoking during pregnancy (n=401) and those who continued (n=1191) suggested that quitting during pregnancy could prevent the adverse effect of maternal smoking during pregnancy on offspring blood pressure. The fully adjusted difference (quitters minus persistent smokers) was 0.69 (95% CI 1.80 to 0.42) mm Hg. However, because of small numbers, this difference was imprecisely estimated.
Paternal Factors
The association of paternal factors with offspring blood pressure was assessed in 3000 offspring with complete data on all variables considered in the fully adjusted model. Blood pressure did not differ between those with complete data and the remainder. Each SD (4.56 kg/m2) increase in paternal body mass index was associated with an age- and gender-adjusted increase in offspring blood pressure of 1.15 (95% CI 0.71 to 1.56) mm Hg. With adjustment for family income during the year of pregnancy, together with maternal characteristics (age at first antenatal visit, body mass index, height, smoking, education level, parity, marital status at pregnancy, and ethnicity), this was attenuated to 0.88 (95% CI 0.43 to 1.34) mm Hg. Further adjustment for birth weight did not alter this association, but additional adjustment for weight and height of the offspring at age 5 years attenuated it to 0.63 (95% CI 0.15 to 1.07) mm Hg. Each SD (8.15 cm) increase in paternal height was associated with an age- and gender-adjusted increase in offspring blood pressure of 0.57 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.93) mm Hg (P<0.001). With full adjustment for all potential confounding and mediating factors, this attenuated to the null: 0.05 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.45) mm Hg.
Birth Order
There was a J-shaped association between birth order and blood pressure (P for quadratic term=0.002; Figure 1). With adjustment for age and gender, blood pressure at age 5 was 0.60 mm Hg (95% CI 0.18 to 1.01 mm Hg) higher for each additional position in birth order, from the second child. With additional adjustment for other maternal characteristics and birth weight, this attenuated to 0.47 mm Hg (95% CI 0.05 to 0.90 mm Hg), maternal age being the covariate largely responsible for this attenuation. Further adjustment for the childs height and weight at age 5 did not substantively alter the association. Blood pressure at age 5 was 1.26 mm Hg (95% CI 0.44 to 2.09) greater among first-born than second-born children. With additional adjustment for other maternal characteristics, birth weight, and the childs height and weight at age 5, this strengthened to 1.45 mm Hg (95% CI 0.62 to 2.25).
|
Birth Size and Breast Feeding
Table 4 shows the associations between birth size and systolic blood pressure among 2989 children with complete data on all variables included in the fully adjusted models. Blood pressure did not differ between those with and without complete data. Additional adjustment for potential confounding factors (maternal and paternal characteristics and socioeconomic position) did not substantively alter the weak positive associations between birth size and blood pressure. Additional adjustment for weight or body mass index at age 5 did not alter the associations (data not shown). However, additional adjustment for height at age 5 resulted in a reversal of the associations between birth weight and length and blood pressure (Table 4). None of the associations between any measures of birth size and blood pressure was statistically significant at the conventional 5% level. There was no evidence of any statistical interactions between any measures of birth size and size at 5 years of age in their associations with blood pressure (all P values >0.18).
|
Children who were breast fed for at least 6 months had lower blood pressure than those who were never breast fed or who were breast fed for fewer than 6 months. The association between breast feeding and systolic blood pressure at age 5 years was not explained by maternal body mass index, smoking, education, parity, marital status, ethnicity, family income, paternal body mass index, birth weight or height, or weight at age 5 years. In the fully adjusted model, blood pressure at age 5 years was 1.19 mm Hg (95% CI 0.40 to 1.96) lower among those who had been breast fed for at least 6 months than among those who were not.
Childhood Height, Weight, and Body Mass Index
The positive associations between the childs height, weight, and body mass index at age 5 and their blood pressure at age 5 (Table 2) were not substantively altered by additional adjustment for maternal and paternal body mass index and height, maternal age during pregnancy, smoking during pregnancy, educational attainment, family income, and birth weight. The fully adjusted change in blood pressure for a 1-SD (1.6 kg/m2) increase in body mass index was 1.33 mm Hg (95% CI 1.19 to 1.43); for a 1-SD (3.1 kg) increase in weight, it was 3.37 mm Hg (95% CI 2.99 to 3.75); and for a 1-SD (5.5 cm) increase in height, it was 2.52 mm Hg (95% CI 2.13 to 2.92 mm Hg). Triceps skinfold thickness at age 5 was only weakly positively associated with systolic blood pressure in age- and gender-adjusted models (Table 2), and this association attenuated to the null in fully adjusted models.
Life Course Influences on Blood Pressure at Age 5
A model containing the childs gender, age in days, weight, and height at the time of blood pressure examination explained 19% of the variation in the childs blood pressure at age 5. The final regression model, which additionally included maternal age, body mass index, smoking throughout pregnancy, educational status, family income during the year of pregnancy, paternal body mass index, birth order (quadratic term), and breast feeding history, explained 27% of the variation.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study Strengths and Limitations
Strengths of this study are the detailed maternal and obstetric data, the large size, and the prospective follow-up. The loss to follow-up was 47%, and the offspring who were not examined at age 5 were more likely to have mothers who were smokers and who were socioeconomically disadvantaged. This selective follow-up would only lead to the present results being an exaggeration of the true effect if the associations were in opposite directions or markedly weaker in nonresponders, which seems unlikely. Paternal size was based on maternal report. Any misclassification is likely to be nondifferential and therefore would tend to dilute the associations. Measurement error in birth length and head circumference, for which data from obstetric records were abstracted in categories, may also have diluted effect sizes.
Obesity and Childhood Blood Pressure
Parents body mass index and childs weight and body mass index were positively and independently associated with childhood systolic blood pressure at age 5. Although these associations may reflect a genetic predisposition to obesity and high blood pressure, they are also likely to be strongly influenced by family diet and physical activity levels. Our findings, together with those of others,17 highlight the importance of childhood and family obesity as a determinant of higher blood pressure in childhood.
Maternal Smoking, Maternal Age at Pregnancy, and Childhood Blood Pressure
An important finding in the present study is the association between maternal smoking and higher blood pressure in offspring. This result is consistent with that of 1 other large cross-sectional study12 and a smaller prospective cohort study,18 although a second small (n=518) prospective study found no association between maternal smoking and offspring systolic blood pressure at age 5 to 9 years.15 To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to suggest that the offspring of women who quit smoking during pregnancy have no higher blood pressure at age 5 than the offspring of women who never smoked. These results should be replicated in other studies. However, they provide further evidence to suggest that programs that support mothers to stop smoking during pregnancy are beneficial to both their health and the future health of their offspring.
Our finding of a positive association between maternal age during pregnancy and offspring blood pressure is consistent with 1 other study12 and with a recent study assessing this association in the newborn period.19 Because a positive association between maternal age and blood pressure persisted when analyses were restricted to first-born children, the trend, in industrialized countries, to delay first birth until the late 20s and early 30s20 may result in an upward shift in the population distribution of blood pressure in future generations.
Birth Order and Childhood Blood Pressure
One previous study has shown that blood pressure increases with the number of siblings.21 The J-shaped association between birth order and systolic blood pressure found in the present study may reflect the similarly shaped association between parity and coronary heart disease in older women.22 Multiparous women tend to be more insulin resistant than other women.23 These disturbances of pregnancy may be associated with greater blood pressure in their offspring. The higher blood pressure in first-born compared with second-born children may be related to maternal health.23 Preeclampsia and high blood pressure are more common in first pregnancies,24,25 and offspring of women who experience these complications are more likely to have higher blood pressure and obesity in later life.13,26 If these mechanisms do explain the observed association between birth order and systolic blood pressure, interventions to control metabolic disturbances during pregnancy would be expected to reduce offspring blood pressure.
Birth Size, Infant Feeding, and Childhood Blood Pressure
Although birth size did not influence blood pressure at age 5, it is possible that such effects only become apparent with increasing age.27 The emergence of a weak inverse association between birth weight and systolic blood pressure with additional adjustment for contemporary height suggests that accelerated linear postnatal growth may influence systolic blood pressure, although we found no evidence of an interaction between birth size and contemporary size in the present study.
The protective effect of breast feeding on childhood blood pressure has also been reported in other observational studies12,13 and in a 13-year follow-up of premature infants who took part in an infant feeding trial.28 Breast feeding may be associated with lower blood pressure through a hormonal effect, may be related to levels of sodium in infant formulas, or may be due to beneficial effects of the long-chain polyunsaturates in breast milk.29
Study Implications
The individual regression coefficients for early life exposures on blood pressure at age 5 years found in the present study are modest, with the largest being for the childs weight at the time of blood pressure measurement. However, together, these maternal, paternal, infancy, and childhood characteristics explained more than 25% of the variation in systolic blood pressure at age 5; if we had been able to allow for within-subject variation, this estimate may have been larger. Further research is required to examine the effect of these early life exposures on adult disease outcomes. Such effects may cumulatively have important public health implications.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Nelson MJ, Ragland DR, Syme SL. Longitudinal prediction of adult blood pressure from juvenile blood pressure levels. Am J Epidemiol. 1992; 136: 633645.
3. Labarthe DR, Eissa M, Varas C. Childhood precursors of high blood pressure and elevated cholesterol. Ann Rev Public Health. 1991; 12: 519541.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Yong LC, Kuller LH, Rutan G, et al. Longitudinal study of blood pressure: changes and determinants from adolescence to middle age: the Dormont High School Follow-up Study, 19571963 to 19891990. Am J Epidemiol. 1993; 138: 973983.
5. Berenson GS, Srinivasan SR, Bao W, et al. Association between multiple cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerosis in children and young adults. N Engl J Med. 1998; 338: 16501656.
6. McCarron P, Davey Smith G, Okasha M, et al. Blood pressure in young adulthood and mortality from cardiovascular disease. Lancet. 2000; 355: 14301431.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Paffenbarger RSJ, Wing AL. Chronic disease in former college students, X: the effects of single and multiple characteristics on risk of fatal coronary heart disease. Am J Epidemiol. 1969; 90: 527535.
8. Paffenbarger J, Wing AL. Chronic disease in former college students, XI: early precursors of nonfatal stroke. Am J Epidemiol. 1971; 94: 524530.
9. McCarron P, Davey Smith G, Okasha M. Secular changes in blood pressure in childhood, adolescence and young adulthood: systematic review of trends from 1948 to 1998. J Hum Hypertens. 2002; 16: 677689.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Collins R, Peto R, MacMahon S, et al. Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease, part 2: short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological context. Lancet. 1990; 335: 827838.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Andersson OK, Almgren T, Persson B, et al. Survival in treated hypertension: follow up study after two decades. BMJ. 1998; 317: 167171.
12. Whincup PH, Cook DG, Shaper AG. Early influences on blood pressure: a study of children aged 57 years. BMJ. 1989; 299: 587591.
13. Taittonen L, Nuutinen M, Turtinen J, et al. Prenatal and postnatal factors in predicting later blood pressure among children: cardiovascular risk in young Finns. Pediatr Res. 1996; 40: 627632.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Ravelli AC, van der Meulen JH, Osmond C, et al. Infant feeding and adult glucose tolerance, lipid profile, blood pressure, and obesity. Arch Dis Child. 2000; 82: 248252.
15. Bergel E, Haelterman E, Belizan J, et al. Perinatal factors associated with blood pressure during childhood. Am J Epidemiol. 2000; 151: 594601.
16. Keeping JD, Najman JM, Morrison J, et al. A prospective longitudinal study of social, psychological and obstetric factors in pregnancy: response rates and demographic characteristics of the 8556 respondents. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989; 96: 289297.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Whincup PH. Fetal origins of cardiovascular risk: evidence from studies in children. Proc Nutr Soc. 1998; 57: 123127.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Blake KV, Gurrnin LC, Evans SF, et al. Maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy, low birth weight and subsequent blood pressure in early childhood. Early Hum Dev. 2000; 57: 137147.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Gillman MW, Rich-Edwards JW, Rifas-Shiman SL, et al. Maternal age and other predictors of newborn blood pressure. J Pediatr. 2004; 144: 240245.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Office for National Statistics. Birth Statistics 1999 England & Wales. FM1 No 28. London: The Stationary Office; 2000.
21. Whincup P, Cook D, Papacosta O, et al. Relation of blood pressure to number of siblings. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325: 891. Letter.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Lawlor DA, Emberson JR, Ebrahim S, et al. Is the association between parity and coronary heart disease due to biological effects of pregnancy or adverse lifestyle risk factors associated with child-rearing? Findings from the British Womens Heart and Health Study and the British Regional Heart Study. Circulation. 2003; 107: 12601264.
23. Sattar N, Greer IA. Pregnancy complications and maternal cardiovascular risk: opportunities for intervention and screening? BMJ. 2002; 325: 157160.
24. Odegard RA, Vatten LJ, Nilsen ST, et al. Risk factors and clinical manifestations of pre-eclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000; 107: 14101416.
25. Parazzini F, Bortolus R, Chatenoud L, et al. Risk factors for pregnancy-induced hypertension in women at high risk for the condition: Italian Study of Aspirin in Pregnancy Group. Epidemiology. 1996; 7: 306308.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Pettitt DJ, Aleck KA, Baird HR, et al. Congenital susceptibility to NIDDM: role of intrauterine environment. Diabetes. 1988; 37: 622628.[Abstract]
27. Huxley RR, Shiell AW, Law CM. The role of size at birth and postnatal catch-up growth in determining systolic blood pressure: a systematic review of the literature. J Hypertens. 2000; 18: 815831.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Singhal A, Cole TJ, Lucas A. Early nutrition in preterm infants and later blood pressure: two cohorts after randomised trials. Lancet. 2001; 357: 413419.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Forsyth JS, Willatts P, Agostoni C, et al. Long chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation in infant formula and blood pressure in later childhood: follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2003; 326: 953955.
Related Article:
Circulation 2004 110: 2277.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Cooper, K. Atherton, and C. Power Gestational age and risk factors for cardiovascular disease: evidence from the 1958 British birth cohort followed to mid-life Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2009; 38(1): 235 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Geerts, M. L. Bots, D. E. Grobbee, and C. S.P.M. Uiterwaal Parental Smoking and Vascular Damage in Young Adult Offspring: Is Early Life Exposure Critical?: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Young Adults Study Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, December 1, 2008; 28(12): 2296 - 2302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Gilbert and M. J. Nijland Sex differences in the developmental origins of hypertension and cardiorenal disease Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2008; 295(6): R1941 - R1952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ceelen, M. M. van Weissenbruch, J. P. W. Vermeiden, F. E. van Leeuwen, and H. A. Delemarre-van de Waal Cardiometabolic Differences in Children Born After in Vitro Fertilization: Follow-Up Study J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2008; 93(5): 1682 - 1688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. von Kries, G. Bolte, L. Baghi, A. M. Toschke, and for the GME Study Group Parental smoking and childhood obesity--is maternal smoking in pregnancy the critical exposure? Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2008; 37(1): 210 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Geerts, D. E. Grobbee, C. K. van der Ent, B. M. de Jong, M. M. van der Zalm, N. van Putte-Katier, J. L.L. Kimpen, and C. S.P.M. Uiterwaal Tobacco Smoke Exposure of Pregnant Mothers and Blood Pressure in Their Newborns: Results from the Wheezing Illnesses Study Leidsche Rijn Birth Cohort Hypertension, September 1, 2007; 50(3): 572 - 578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-J. A. Brion, S. D. Leary, G. D. Smith, and A. R. Ness Similar Associations of Parental Prenatal Smoking Suggest Child Blood Pressure Is Not Influenced by Intrauterine Effects Hypertension, June 1, 2007; 49(6): 1422 - 1428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. W. Jaddoe, B. O. Verburg, M. de Ridder, A. Hofman, J. P. Mackenbach, H. A. Moll, E. A. Steegers, and J. C. Witteman Maternal Smoking and Fetal Growth Characteristics in Different Periods of Pregnancy: The Generation R Study Am. J. Epidemiol., May 15, 2007; 165(10): 1207 - 1215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Al Mamun, F. V O'Callaghan, R. Alati, M. O'Callaghan, J. M Najman, G. M Williams, and W. Bor Does maternal smoking during pregnancy predict the smoking patterns of young adult offspring? A birth cohort study Tob. Control, December 1, 2006; 15(6): 452 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Al Mamun, D. A. Lawlor, R. Alati, M. J. O'Callaghan, G. M. Williams, and J. M. Najman Does Maternal Smoking during Pregnancy Have a Direct Effect on Future Offspring Obesity? Evidence from a Prospective Birth Cohort Study Am. J. Epidemiol., August 15, 2006; 164(4): 317 - 325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kivimaki, D. A. Lawlor, G. D. Smith, L. Keltikangas-Jarvinen, M. Elovainio, J. Vahtera, L. Pulkki-Raback, L. Taittonen, J. S.A. Viikari, and O. T. Raitakari Early Socioeconomic Position and Blood Pressure in Childhood and Adulthood: The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study Hypertension, January 1, 2006; 47(1): 39 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Najman, W Bor, M O'Callaghan, G. Williams, R Aird, and G Shuttlewood Cohort Profile: The Mater-University of Queensland Study of Pregnancy (MUSP) Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2005; 34(5): 992 - 997. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Mamun, D. A. Lawlor, M. J. O'Callaghan, G. M. Williams, and J. M. Najman Effect of Body Mass Index Changes Between Ages 5 and 14 on Blood Pressure at Age 14: Findings From a Birth Cohort Study Hypertension, June 1, 2005; 45(6): 1083 - 1087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Martin, D. Gunnell, and G. Davey Smith Breastfeeding in Infancy and Blood Pressure in Later Life: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Am. J. Epidemiol., January 1, 2005; 161(1): 15 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |