(Circulation. 2004;110:2266-2275.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
AHA Scientific Statement |
Key Words: AHA Scientific Statements pediatrics prevention public health schools
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Background and Rationale |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Epidemiological studies, including the Third National Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), provide nationally representative data on the prevalence and trends of risk factors, including CVD-related health behaviors.1216 Useful in informing and guiding public health strategies, these data support the need for more effective population-based approaches to cardiovascular health in children and youth. A particularly disturbing trend, observed in NHANES and other national surveys, is the dramatic increase in the prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and youth.13 Recent data (19992000) from NHANES indicate that 15.5% of 6- to 19-year-olds and 10.4% of 2- to 5-year-olds are overweight (BMI
95th age-specific percentile).14 The prevalence of overweight among non-Hispanic black (23.6%) and Mexican-American (23.4%) adolescents increased >10 percentage points between NHANES III (19881994) and the most recent survey (19992000).14 This trend is of particular concern because obesity clusters with other major CVD risk factors, including hypertension, dyslipidemia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus.15,25,26 The results of several recent clinical studies documented increases in the prevalence of obesity-induced diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents, particularly among minority youth.25,26 National surveys indicate that patterns of dietary intake and physical activity for the majority of children and youth are not meeting current recommendations. Dietary fat intake has decreased over the past 2 decades from 36.3% to 34% of total food energy intake (EI); however, saturated fat intake (12% to 13% of EI) exceeds current recommendations.27 Paralleling the NHANES prevalence and trend data for overweight, minority youth (black and Mexican American) have significantly higher saturated fat intakes than their white counterparts.12,27 National data on intake of 3-year-olds (surveyed in the 1995 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals [CSFII]28) also suggest that preschool children are exceeding the recommendations for saturated fat intake. Recently, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) compared the macronutrient and micronutrient contents of menus for young children who participated in the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) with nutrient standards.29 The Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommendations were used as the standard for percentage of energy from total fat and saturated fat.30 An analysis of CACFP menus from these preschool day care programs indicated that the total fat and saturated fat content of the childrens lunches exceeded the levels recommended in these guidelines.29 In addition, 2001 data from the national Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance (YRBS) indicated that almost 80% of schoolchildren do not consume the recommended 5 or more servings of fruits and vegetables per day.31
Physical activity data from the YRBS indicated that the proportion of students who attend physical education (PE) classes daily decreased from 41.6% in 1991 to 29.1% in 1999.31 Of the students who reported attending PE classes, only about one third reported that they actually exercise 20 minutes or more during PE class. In addition, daily attendance in PE classes and participation in recreational/leisure-time physical activity decreased substantially from grades 9 through 12. This pattern of change was more pronounced among girls. For example, in the 2001 YRBS survey the rate of participation by girls in sufficient vigorous physical activity was 67% in grade 9 and 45% in grade 12.31 Similarly, data from the longitudinal National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Growth and Health Study indicated precipitous declines in leisure-time physical activity throughout adolescence among both black and white girls.32 By age 18 or 19, 56% of black girls and 31% of white girls reported no habitual recreational activity. Noteworthy predictors of declines in physical activity included lower levels of parental education, higher BMI, pregnancy (black girls only), and cigarette smoking (white girls only).32
Prevalence and trend data for cigarette smoking among US children and youth also provide cause for concern.12,31 In 2001, 28.5% of high school students were current cigarette smokers, compared with 27.5% in 1991.31 Data from NHANES III and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicated racial/ethnic differences in the rates of smoking among high school students, particularly among girls; white girls smoke at higher rates than their black or Hispanic counterparts.12,31
Collectively, available evidence, including CVD risk factor prevalence and trend data, emphasizes the need for both individual/high-risk and population-based approaches to the primary prevention of CVD beginning in childhood. By definition, public health or population-based approaches are designed to shift the entire distribution of risk factors within the population to more desirable levels. The AHAs Guide for Improving Cardiovascular Health at the Community Level33 outlines a comprehensive list of goals, strategies, and recommendations that exemplify the population-based approach. As such, they are intended for and are applicable on a community-wide basis, and they identify relevant community-based structures (including schools) as central and essential components of population-based strategies. The rationale for school-based heart health education and related preventive interventions is compelling. One third of the Year 2010 health objectives for the nation can be significantly influenced by school health programs, a fact that highlights the key role of schools in achieving national health objectives.34 Through schools, virtually all of our nations youth can be reached, and through youth, both parents and teachers may be reached as well. Schools provide many opportunities for shaping dietary and physical activity behaviors, which influence CVD risk factors such as blood lipids, blood pressure, and adiposity. School policies and health education initiatives also influence the adoption of cigarette smoking in youth, another major risk factor for CVD. School-based programs are unique in that they have the ability to provide and sustain stable and effective educational initiatives within existing institutional structures.
School-Based Cardiovascular Health Promotion/Risk Reduction Research
Since the late 1970s, numerous school-based health promotion interventions have been developed and tested: Some exclusively addressed heart health, and others addressed risk factors for CVD through a more comprehensive approach. Many of the earlier first-generation studies were primarily didactic and focused on positively influencing health knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported behavior. By the mid-1980s, school-based research focused on theoretically derived behavioral interventions and incorporated the assessment and measurement of physiological risk factors for CVD as primary end points/outcomes.35 The results of these second-generation trials (reviewed, critiqued, and synthesized by Resnicow and Robinson35) demonstrated the potential of school-based interventions for improving the CVD risk status of children and youth and informed the third generation of research that extended beyond the classroom, with interventions focused on the broader school environment, including food service, physical activity programs and facilities, and school policies that affect health-related behaviors. Extension into after-school and community programs and linkages with community agencies also were emphasized.
The Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH) exemplifies the third generation of school-based research.21,3639 Specifically, CATCH was the largest randomized controlled field trial designed to evaluate the effects of theoretically derived multicomponent (individual-, school-, and family-based) interventions on risk factors for CVD in elementary school children. Included in this multisite trial were 96 schools (56 intervention, 40 control) from 4 geographic areas (California, Louisiana, Minnesota, and Texas). The sample at baseline included third-grade students from ethnically diverse backgrounds. The CATCH intervention consisted of school-based (classroom curricula, food service, PE) and family-based (home curricula) components. Primary end points/outcomes at the school level were changes in the fat content of food service lunch offerings and the amount of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in PE. At the individual-student level, serum cholesterol change was the primary end point; psychosocial factors, recall measures of eating and physical activity behaviors, and other physiological measures were secondary end points.21,3638 Three-year outcomes indicated that CATCH interventions were able to modify the fat content of school lunches, increase MVPA, and improve eating and physical activity behaviors.21 Specifically, the total fat content of school lunch menus decreased significantly more in intervention schools (from 38.7% to 31.9%) than in control schools (from 38.9% to 36.2%). Similarly, the CATCH intervention decreased the saturated fat content of school lunch menus from 14.8% to 12.0%; that for control schools decreased from 15.1% to 13.7%. Concomitantly, the CATCH PE intervention resulted in a significant increase in the percentage of MVPA during PE classfrom 37% to 52%with students in the intervention schools also demonstrating greater energy expenditure than did their control school counterparts. No significant between-group (interventioncontrol school) differences in serum cholesterol or other physiological measures were observed.21 A follow-up of 73% (n=3714) of the CATCH cohort was conducted to assess differences maintained through the eighth grade in diet, physical activity, and related health indicators, including physiological measures of CVD risk.39 Intervention students maintained a higher self-reported daily MVPA than did controls; however, between-group differences declined over time (from 13.6 minutes in the fifth grade to 8.8 minutes in the eighth grade). The between-group differential in self-reported daily EI from fat was maintained. Consistent with 3-year outcomes,21 no significant between-group differences were observed in any of the physiological indicators of CVD risk, including serum cholesterol, blood pressure, and BMI.39
Collectively, the CATCH results and the data generated from other recent research support the potential role of schools (as defined in the AHAs Guide for Improving Cardiovascular Health at the Community Level33) as key structures for population-based behavioral change interventions. Illustrating the importance of multicomponent interventions, including environmental and individual-level strategies, CATCH has been used as a model for guiding and informing other programs, including the Healthy Start project (discussed below) for preschoolers. Results from CATCH and other third-generation school-based studies suggest that effective behavioral change strategies with children and youth must extend beyond the individual level and target environments in which health behaviors develop and are influenced. The effectiveness of CATCH in altering eating and physical activity behaviors has been attributed in part to involving school environmental changes as intervention elements. Behavioral differences narrowed in magnitude but persisted for 3 years after intervention, pointing to the need for follow-up that reinforces interventions at both the school and individual levels.39 Recent results from CATCH-ON,4042 which was designed to assess the sustainability of CATCH, reaffirm this need as they emphasize the school-level infrastructures and the school and environmental policies necessary to maintain CVD-related health behaviors, including the recommended levels of physical activity in PE classes and the macronutrient content of school lunch programs.4042
Preschool Cardiovascular Health Promotion/Risk Reduction Research
Paralleling the third generation of school-based cardiovascular healthpromotion/risk-reduction research was the emergence of preschool-based research and heart health education initiatives. Contemporary preschool heart health programs are based on the premise that for children to be able to take care of themselves, they need to know what to do to keep themselves healthy (knowledge), need to believe that healthy living is really important to them (good attitudes), and need the opportunity to practice good health behavior, not just talk about it (actions and behavior). The ultimate goal is to enable young children to make healthy lifestyle choices and develop good health behaviors in the first place, rather than learn bad habits that need to be undone later.43 Toward that goal and building on lessons learned from CATCH and other third-generation school-based studies, research and demonstration projects (completed and in progress) that target preschool populations illustrate the importance of efforts focused on the individual child and relevant preschool and social and environmental factors.4449
Healthy Start, an example of a preschool-based demonstration and education research project, was initiated in the mid-1990s with funding from NHLBI-NIH (National Institutes of Health) and was modeled in part on CATCH.4447 The project was designed to evaluate the impact of a multicomponent preschool cardiovascular health intervention, including the modification of meals and snacks served by the school food service, in a largely minority Head Start preschool population. Specific aims were reducing the total and saturated fat content of preschool meals and snacks, increasing nutrition knowledge, and reducing total serum cholesterol. Nine Head Start centers in upstate New York were assigned to either food service modification or control conditions. Half of the centers assigned to the food service modification also received supplemental nutrition education, whereas the remaining food service modification and the control centers were provided with supplemental safety education materials. Teacher-training workshops led by health education and nutrition specialists preceded all program activities. Children in each of the preschool centers were evaluated twice each year for 3 years, with semiannual measures taken of health knowledge and attitudes, dietary intake, growth patterns, body fatness, and blood cholesterol. Evaluation of the Healthy Start program showed that meals and snacks in the intervention preschools became more heart healthy. Specifically, the saturated fat content of preschool menus decreased from 12.5% to 8.0% EI in intervention schools, whereas the saturated fat content in the control schools decreased from 12.1% to 11.6%.44,45 Although several strategies were used to achieve this goal, reducing the fat content of milk and other dairy products, as suggested in the AHAs recommendations, was commonly employed. In addition, children in the intervention preschools, as compared with controls, experienced greater improvement in nutrition and overall health knowledge scores.46 Noteworthy recent results indicate a significant decrease in total serum cholesterol among the Healthy Start children who participated in the food service intervention groups (6.0 mg/dL) as compared with controls (0.4 mg/dL).47 In addition, children with elevated cholesterol levels at baseline were significantly more likely to have cholesterol levels in the normal range (<170 mg/dL) at follow-up if they were assigned to a food service modification/intervention preschool.47
Taken together and combined with results from other early childhood health promotion initiatives,43,48,49 the above findings suggest that multicomponent preschool programs can be effective in promoting the adoption of heart-healthy behaviors and reducing risk factors for CVD. Similar to school-based programs and central to successful outcomes are theoretically derived developmentally appropriate interventions that address knowledge and behavioral skill training, provide participatory opportunities for children, and target dimensions of the preschool environment that extend beyond the classroom.
Summary and Future Directions
The collective results of school-based research support the recommendations outlined in the AHAs Guide for Improving Cardiovascular Health at the Community Level33 that emphasized schools as important components of population-based cardiovascular health promotion and risk-reduction efforts. Specifically, the majority of school-based studies, including those summarized in the Table21,22,5061 and reviewed by Resnicow and Robinson35 and Meininger,62 reported statistically significant effects on health knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral outcomes. Although on average the diet and physical activity changes reported in some studies may appear to be modest in magnitude, from a population perspective they translate into potentially sizable reductions in population-attributable CVD risk and must be interpreted within the context of population-wide strategies. Similarly, the results of school-based intervention research to date have showed a modest change in physiological indicators including serum cholesterol, blood pressure, and measures of adiposity. Critical reviews of CATCH and other school-based research that included physiological indicators as primary outcomes offer insight and provide direction for future school-based initiatives.63 Specifically, the characteristics of the intervention (eg, dose, duration, and methods of delivery), effects of pubertal maturation (eg, interindividual differences in physiological changes during puberty that bias the effects of intervention), and methodological limitations inherent in school-based designs (eg, differential selection, attrition) are important areas for consideration. To ensure the fidelity of the intervention, the quality and quantity of implementation, training, and support for providers are as essential as is ongoing process evaluation.6466 Across well-controlled and well-conducted studies, differential results in physiological outcome indicators point to the need for researchers to pay more attention to developmental age, gender, culture, and sociodemographic factors. Taken together, these results indicate that the modification of risk factors for CVD in "real-world" school settings must be reinforced and complemented at multiple levels of intervention. Toward that goal, from a population perspective, broader public health interventions as suggested in the AHAs Guide for Improving Cardiovascular Health at the Community Level are warranted.33 Partnerships between healthcare and educational professionals in collaboration with policymakers and community leaders will be required to actualize the school environment in promoting the cardiovascular health of all of our children and youth and reducing the risk and public health burden of CVD.
|
| Recommendations |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Heart Health Education and Health Behaviors
Goals
Recommendations
School Policies
Goals
Recommendations
School and Community Linkages
Goal
Recommendation
| Disclosure |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Suggested Reading |
|---|
|
|
|---|
School Health Education and Research
Preschool Heart Health Education and Research
| Footnotes |
|---|
This statement was approved by the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee on July 19, 2004. A single reprint is available by calling 800-242-8721 (US only) or writing the American Heart Association, Public Information, 7272 Greenville Ave, Dallas, TX 75231-4596. Ask for reprint No. 71-0299. To purchase additional reprints: up to 999 copies, call 800-611-6083 (US only) or fax 413-665-2671; 1000 or more copies, call 410-528-4121, fax 410-528-4264, or e-mail kgray@lww.com. To make photocopies for personal or educational use, call the Copyright Clearance Center, 978-750-8400.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Relationship of atherosclerosis in young men to serum lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations and smoking: a preliminary report from the Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth (PDAY) Research Group. JAMA. 1990; 264: 30183024.
3. Newman WP III, Freedman DS, Voors AW, Gard PD, Srinivasan SR, Cresanta JL, Williamson GD, Webber LS, Berenson GS. Relation of serum lipoprotein levels and systolic blood pressure to early atherosclerosis: the Bogalusa Heart Study. N Engl J Med. 1986; 314: 138144.[Abstract]
4. Berenson GS, Srinivasan SR, Bao W, Newman WP III, Tracy RE, Wattigney WA. Association between multiple cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerosis in children and young adults. The Bogalusa Heart Study. N Engl J Med. 1998; 338: 16501656.
5. McGill HC Jr, McMahan CA, Zieske AW, Malcom GT, Tracy RE, Strong JP. Effects of nonlipid risk factors on atherosclerosis in youth with a favorable lipoprotein profile. Circulation. 2001; 103: 15461550.
6. Mahoney LT, Burns TL, Stanford W, Thompson BH, Witt JD, Rost CA, Lauer RM. Coronary risk factors measured in childhood and young adult life are associated with coronary artery calcification in young adults: the Muscatine Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996; 27: 277284.[Abstract]
7. Li S, Chen W, Srinivasan SR, Bond MG, Tang R, Urbina EM, Berenson GS. Childhood cardiovascular risk factors and carotid vascular changes in adulthood: the Bogalusa Heart Study. JAMA. 2003; 290: 22712276.
8. Raitakari OT, Juonala M, Kahonen L, Taittonen L, Laitinen T, Maki-Torkko N, Jarvisalo MJ, Uhari M, Jokinen E, Ronnemaa T, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors in childhood and carotid artery intima-media thickness in adulthood: the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. JAMA. 2003; 290: 22772283.
9. Luepker RV, Jacobs DR, Prineas RJ, Sinaiko AR. Secular trends of blood pressure and body size in a multi-ethnic adolescent population: 1986 to 1996. J Pediatr. 1999; 134: 668674.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Lauer RM, Clarke WR. Childhood risk factors for high adult blood pressure: the Muscatine Study. Pediatrics. 1989; 84: 633641.
11. Lauer RM, Lee J, Clarke WR. Factors affecting the relationship between childhood and adult cholesterol levels: the Muscatine Study. Pediatrics. 1988; 82: 309318.
12. Winkleby MA, Robinson TN, Sundquist J, Kraemer HC. Ethnic variation in cardiovascular disease risk factors among children and young adults: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 19881994. JAMA. 1999; 281: 10061013.
13. Troiano RP, Flegal KM, Kuczmarski RJ, Campbell SM, Johnson CL. Overweight prevalence and trends for children and adolescents: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1963 to 1991. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995; 149: 10851091.
14. Ogden CL, Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Johnson CL. Prevalence and trends in overweight among US children and adolescents, 19992000. JAMA. 2002; 288: 17281732.
15. Cook S, Weitzman M, Auinger MS, Nguyen M, Dietz WH. Prevalence of a metabolic syndrome phenotype in adolescents: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 19881994. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003; 157: 821827.
16. Levin S, Lowry R, Brown DR, Dietz WH. Physical activity and body mass index among US adolescents: Youth Risk Behavior Survey, 1999. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003; 157: 816820.
17. Kavey RE, Daniels SR, Lauer RM, Atkins DL, Hayman LL, Taubert K, American Heart Association. American Heart Association guidelines for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease beginning in childhood [published simultaneously in J Pediatr. 2003;142:368372]. Circulation. 2003; 107: 15621566.
18. Janz KF, Dawson JD, Mahoney LT. Tracking physical fitness and physical activity from childhood to adolescence: the Muscatine study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000; 32: 12501257.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Efficacy and safety of lowering dietary intake of fat and cholesterol in children with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The Dietary Intervention Study in Children (DISC). The Writing Group for the DISC Collaborative Research Group. JAMA. 1995; 273: 14291435.
20. Obarzanek E, Kimm SY, Barton BA, Van Horn LL, Kwiterovich PO Jr, Simons-Morton DG, Hunsberger SA, Lasser NL, Robson AM, Franklin FA Jr, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of a cholesterol-lowering diet in children with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: seven-year results of the Dietary Intervention Study in Children (DISC). Pediatrics. 2001; 107: 256264.
21. Luepker RV, Perry CL, McKinlay SM, Nader PR, Parcel GS, Stone EJ, Webber LS, Elder JP, Feldman HA, Johnson CC, et al. Outcomes of a field trial to improve childrens dietary patterns and physical activity. The Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health. CATCH collaborative group. JAMA. 1996; 275: 768776.
22. Harrell JS, McMurray RG, Bangdiwala SI, Frauman AC, Gansky SA, Bradley CB. Effects of a school-based intervention to reduce cardiovascular disease risk factors in elementary-school children: the Cardiovascular Health in Children (CHIC) study. J Pediatr. 1996; 128: 797805.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Harrell JS, McMurray RG, Gansky SA, Bangdiwala SI, Bradley CB. A public health vs a risk-based intervention to improve cardiovascular health in elementary school children: the Cardiovascular Health in Children Study. Am J Public Health. 1999; 89: 15291535.
24. Robinson TN. Reducing childrens television viewing to prevent obesity: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1999; 282: 15611567.
25. Pinhas-Hamiel O, Dolan LM, Daniels SR, Standiford D, Khoury PR, Zeitler P. Increased incidence of noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus among adolescents. J Pediatr. 1996; 128 (5 pt 1): 608615.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Fagot-Campagna A. Pettitt DJ, Engelgau MM, Burrows NR, Geiss LS, Valdez R, Beckles GL, Saaddine J, Gregg EW, Williamson DF, et al. Type 2 diabetes among North American children and adolescents: an epidemiologic review and a public health perspective. J Pediatr. 2000; 136: 664672.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. McDowell MA, Briefel RR, Alaimo K, Bischof AM, Caughman CR, Carroll MD, Loria CM, Johnson CL. Energy and Macronutrient Intakes of Persons Ages 2 Months and Over in the United States: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, Phase 1, 198891. Hyattsville, Md: National Center for Health Statistics; 1994. Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics; No. 255.
28. Food and Nutrient Intakes by Individuals in the United States, By Sex and Age, 19941996. Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals. Springfield, Va: National Technical Information Service; 1998. Agricultural Research Service NFS Rep No. 962.
29. US Department of Agriculture, Food and Consumer Service, Office of Analysis and Evaluation. Early Childhood and Child Care Study: Nutritional Assessment of the CACFP. Final Report. Vol I, II. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1997.
30. US Department of Agriculture and US Department of Health and Human Services. Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 5th ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2000.
31. Grunbaum JA, Kann L, Kinchen SA, Williams B, Ross JG, Lowry R, Kolbe L. Youth risk behavior surveillanceUnited States, 2001. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2002; 51: 162[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Kimm SY, Glynn NW, Kriska AM, Barton BA, Kronsberg SS, Daniels SR, Crawford PB, Sabry ZI, Liu K. Decline in physical activity in black girls and white girls during adolescence. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 709715.
33. Pearson TA, Bazzarre TL, Daniels SR, Fair JM, Fortmann SP, Franklin BA, Goldstein LB, Hong Y, Mensah GA, Sallis JF Jr, et al. American Heart Association guide for improving cardiovascular health at the community level: a statement for public health practitioners, healthcare providers, and health policy makers from the American Heart Association Expert Panel on Population and Prevention Science. Circulation. 2003; 107: 645651.
34. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010. Understanding and Improving Health. Objectives for Improving Health. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2000.
35. Resnicow K, Robinson TN. School-based cardiovascular disease prevention studies: review and synthesis. Ann Epidemiol. 1997; S7: S14S31.
36. Dwyer JT, Hewes LV, Mitchell PD, Nicklas TA, Montgomery DH, Lytle LA, Snyder MP, Zive MM, Bachman KJ, Rice R, et al. Improving school breakfasts: effects of the CATCH Eat Smart Program on the nutrient content of school breakfasts. Prev Med. 1996; 25: 413422.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Edmundson E, Parcel GS, Feldman HA, Elder J, Perry CL, Johnson CC, Williston BJ, Stone EJ, Yang M, Lytle L, et al. The effects of the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health upon psychosocial determinants of diet and physical activity behavior. Prev Med. 1996; 25: 442454.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Lytle LA, Stone EJ, Nichaman M, Perry CL, Montgomery DH, Nicklas TA, Zive MM, Mitchell P, Dwyer JT, Ebzery MK, et al. Changes in nutrient intakes of elementary school children following a school-based intervention: results from the CATCH Study. Prev Med. 1996; 25: 465477.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Nader PR, Stone EJ, Lytle LA, Perry CL, Osganian SK, Kelder S, Webber LS, Elder JP, Montgomery D, Feldman HA, et al. Three-year maintenance of improved diet and physical activity: the CATCH cohort. Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999; 153: 695704.
40. McKenzie TL, Li D, Derby CA, Webber LS, Luepker RV, Cribb P. Maintenance of effects of the CATCH physical education program: results from the CATCH-ON study. Health Educ Behav. 2003; 30: 447462.[Abstract]
41. Osganian SK, Hoelscher DM, Zive M, Mitchell PD, Snyder P, Webber LS. Maintenance of effects of the eat smart school food service program: results from the CATCH-ON study. Health Educ Behav. 2003; 30: 418433.[Abstract]
42. Parcel GS, Perry CL, Kelder SH, Elder JP, Mitchell PD, Lytle LA, Johnson CC, Stone EJ. School climate and the institutionalization of the CATCH program. Health Educ Behav. 2003; 30: 489502.[Abstract]
43. Weikart DP. Changing early childhood development through educational intervention. Prev Med. 1998; 27: 233237.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Williams CL, Bollella MC, Strobino BA, Spark A, Nicklas TA, Tolosi LB, Pittman BP. "Healthy-start": outcome of an intervention to promote a heart healthy diet in preschool children. J Am Coll Nutr. 2002; 21: 6271.
45. DAgostino C, DAndrea T, Lieberman L, Sprance L, Williams CL. Healthy Start: a new comprehensive preschool health education program. J Health Educ. 1999; 30: 912.
46. DAgostino C, DAndrea T, Nix ST, Williams CL. Increasing nutrition knowledge in preschool children: the Healthy Start Project year 1. J Health Educ. 1999; 30: 217221.
47. Williams CL, Strobino BA, Bollella M, Brotanek J. Cardiovascular risk reduction in preschool children: the "Healthy Start" project. J Am Coll Nutr. 2004; 23: 117123.
48. Dennison BA. Rural Community Partnership to Promote Fitness by Age Five [grant narrative, RO1-DK-063460-01]. Bethesda, Md: National Institutes of HealthNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [ongoing].
49. Dennison BA, Russo TJ, Burdick MA, Jenkins PL. An intervention to reduce television viewing by preschool children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004; 158: 170176.
50. Walter HJ, Hofman A, Vaughan RD, Wynder EL. Modification of risk factors for coronary heart disease: five-year results of a school-based intervention trial. N Engl J Med. 1988; 318: 10931100.[Abstract]
51. Bush PJ, Zuckerman AE, Taggart VS, Theiss PK, Peleg EO, Smith SA. Cardiovascular risk factor prevention in black school children: the "Know Your Body" evaluation project. Health Educ Q. 1989; 16: 215227.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Bush PJ, Zuckerman AE, Theiss PK, Taggart VS, Horowitz C, Sheridan MJ, Walter HJ. Cardiovascular risk factor prevention in black schoolchildren: two-year results of the "Know Your Body" program. Am J Epidemiol. 1989; 129: 466482.
53. McMurray RG, Harrell JS, Bangdiwala SI, Bradley CB, Deng S, Levine A. A school-based intervention can reduce body fat and blood pressure in young adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2002; 31: 125132.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Parcel GS, Simons-Morton B, OHara NM, Baranowski T, Wilson B. School promotion of healthful diet and physical activity: impact on learning outcomes and self-reported behavior. Health Educ Q. 1989; 16: 181199.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
55. Simons-Morton BG, Parcel GS, Baranowski T, Forthofer R, OHara NM. Promoting physical activity and a healthful diet among children: results of a school-based intervention study. Am J Public Health. 1991; 81: 986991.
56. Arbeit ML, Johnson CC, Mott DS, Harsha DW, Nicklas TA, Webber LS, Berenson GS. The Heart Smart cardiovascular school health promotion: behavior correlates of risk factor change. Prev Med. 1992; 21: 1832.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. Berenson GS, Arbeit ML, Hunter SM, Johnson CC, Nicklas TA. Cardiovascular health promotion for elementary school children. The Heart Smart Program. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991; 623: 299313.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
58. Gortmaker SL, Peterson K, Wiecha J, Sobol AM, Dixit S, Fox MK, Laird N. Reducing obesity via a school-based interdisciplinary intervention among youth: Planet Health. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999; 153: 409418.
59. Sallis JF, McKenzie TL, Alcaraz JE, Kolody B, Faucette N, Hovell MF. The effects of a 2-year physical education program (SPARK) on physical activity and fitness in elementary school students. Sports, Play and Active Recreation for Kids. Am J Public Health. 1997; 87: 13281334.
60. Killen JD, Telch MJ, Robinson TN, Maccoby N, Taylor CB, Farquhar JW. Cardiovascular disease risk reduction for tenth graders: a multiple-factor school-based approach. JAMA. 1988; 260: 17281733.
61. Killen JD, Robinson TN, Telch MJ, Saylor KE, Maron DJ, Rich T, Bryson S. The Stanford Adolescent Heart Health Program. Health Educ Q. 1989; 16: 263283.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
62. Meininger JC. School-based interventions for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: evidence of effects for minority populations. Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2000; 18: 219244.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
63. Resnicow K, Robinson TH, Frank E. Advances and future directions for school-based health promotion research: commentary on the CATCH intervention trial. Prev Med. 1996; 25: 378383.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
64. Lytle LA, Davidann BZ, Bachman K, Edmundson EW, Johnson CC, Reeds JN, Wambsgans KC, Budman S. CATCH: challenges of conducting process evaluation in a multicenter trial. Health Educ Q. 1994; (suppl 2): S129S142.
65. McGraw SA, Stone EJ, Osganian SK, Elder JP, Perry CL, Johnson CC, Parcel GS, Webber LS, Luepker RV. Design of process evaluation within the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH). Health Educ Q. 1994; (suppl 2): S5S26.
66. Elder JP, McGraw SA, Stone EJ, Reed DB, Harsha DW, Greene T, Wambsgans KC. CATCH: process evaluation of environmental factors and programs. Health Educ Q. 1994; (suppl 2): S107S127.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. C. Harris, L. K. Kuramoto, M. Schulzer, and J. E. Retallack Effect of school-based physical activity interventions on body mass index in children: a meta-analysis Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 31, 2009; 180(7): 719 - 726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Gidding, A. H. Lichtenstein, M. S. Faith, A. Karpyn, J. A. Mennella, B. Popkin, J. Rowe, L. Van Horn, and L. Whitsel Implementing American Heart Association Pediatric and Adult Nutrition Guidelines: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Nutrition Committee of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity and Metabolism, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, Council on Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, and Council for High Blood Pressure Research Circulation, March 3, 2009; 119(8): 1161 - 1175. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Kumanyika, E. Obarzanek, N. Stettler, R. Bell, A. E. Field, S. P. Fortmann, B. A. Franklin, M. W. Gillman, C. E. Lewis, W. C. Poston II, et al. Population-Based Prevention of Obesity: The Need for Comprehensive Promotion of Healthful Eating, Physical Activity, and Energy Balance: A Scientific Statement From American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Interdisciplinary Committee for Prevention (Formerly the Expert Panel on Population and Prevention Science) Circulation, July 22, 2008; 118(4): 428 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Spear, S. E. Barlow, C. Ervin, D. S. Ludwig, B. E. Saelens, K. E. Schetzina, and E. M. Taveras Recommendations for Treatment of Child and Adolescent Overweight and Obesity Pediatrics, December 1, 2007; 120(Supplement_4): S254 - S288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. L. Hayman, J. C. Meininger, S. R. Daniels, B. W. McCrindle, L. Helden, J. Ross, B. A. Dennison, J. Steinberger, and C. L. Williams Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Nursing Practice: Focus on Children and Youth: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in Youth of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, and Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism Circulation, July 17, 2007; 116(3): 344 - 357. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. de Ferranti, D. Shapiro, R. Markowitz, E. Neufeld, N. Rifai, and H. Bernstein Nonfasting Low-Density Lipoprotein Testing: Utility for Cholesterol Screening in Pediatric Primary Care Clinical Pediatrics, June 1, 2007; 46(5): 441 - 445. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. R. Pate, M. G. Davis, T. N. Robinson, E. J. Stone, T. L. McKenzie, and J. C. Young Promoting Physical Activity in Children and Youth: A Leadership Role for Schools: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Physical Activity Committee) in Collaboration With the Councils on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young and Cardiovascular Nursing Circulation, September 12, 2006; 114(11): 1214 - 1224. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
American Heart Association, S. S. Gidding, B. A. Dennison, L. L. Birch, S. R. Daniels, M. W. Gilman, A. H. Lichtenstein, K. T. Rattay, J. Steinberger, N. Stettler, et al. Dietary Recommendations for Children and Adolescents: A Guide for Practitioners Pediatrics, February 1, 2006; 117(2): 544 - 559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics, S. S. Gidding, B. A. Dennison, L. L. Birch, S. R. Daniels, M. W. Gilman, A. H. Lichtenstein, K. T. Rattay, J. Steinberger, N. Stettler, et al. Dietary Recommendations for Children and Adolescents: A Guide for Practitioners: Consensus Statement From the American Heart Association Circulation, September 27, 2005; 112(13): 2061 - 2075. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Eckel, S. R. Daniels, A. K. Jacobs, and R. M. Robertson America's Children: A Critical Time for Prevention Circulation, April 19, 2005; 111(15): 1866 - 1868. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |