This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 110/14/1885    most recent 01.CIR.0000143160.14610.53v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bloomfield, D. M. Articles by Bigger, J. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bloomfield, D. M. Articles by Bigger, J. T., Jr Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Cardiac Arrest Pacemakers and Implantable Defibrillators Related Collections Acute myocardial infarction Chronic ischemic heart disease Congestive Electrocardiology Ablation/ICD/surgery Exercise testing

(Circulation. 2004;110:1885-1889.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.

Arrhythmia/Electrophysiology

Microvolt T-Wave Alternans Distinguishes Between Patients Likely and Patients Not Likely to Benefit From Implanted Cardiac Defibrillator Therapy

A Solution to the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) II Conundrum

Daniel M. Bloomfield, MD; Richard C. Steinman, AB; Pearila B. Namerow, PhD; Michael Parides, PhD; Jorge Davidenko, MD; Elizabeth S. Kaufman, MD; Timothy Shinn, MD; Anne Curtis, MD; John Fontaine, MD; Douglas Holmes, MD; Andrea Russo, MD; Chuen Tang, MD; J. Thomas Bigger, Jr, MD

From the Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY (D.M.B., R.C.S., P.B.N., M.P., J.T.B.); New York Heart Center, Syracuse (J.D.); MetroHealth, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (E.S.K.); Michigan Heart PC, Ypsilanti (T.S.); University of Florida, Gainesville (A.C.); Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (J.F.); New York University, New York (D.H.); University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (A.R.); and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis (C.T.).

Correspondence to Daniel M. Bloomfield, MD, Data Coordinating Center, The MTWA in CHF Study, PH 9-103D, Columbia University, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032. E-mail dmb9{at}columbia.edu

Received March 30, 2004; revision received June 30, 2004; accepted July 7, 2004.

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Appendix References

 
Background— In 2003, the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services recommended QRS duration as a means to identify MADIT II–like patients suitable for implanted cardiac defibrillator (ICD) therapy. We compared the ability of microvolt T-wave alternans and QRS duration to identify groups at high and low risk of dying among heart failure patients who met MADIT II criteria for ICD prophylaxis.

Methods and Results— Patients with MADIT II characteristics and sinus rhythm had a microvolt T-wave alternans exercise test and a 12-lead ECG. Our primary end point was 2-year all-cause mortality. Of 177 MADIT II–like patients, 32% had a QRS duration >120 ms, and 68% had an abnormal (positive or indeterminate) microvolt T-wave alternans test. During an average follow-up of 20±6 months, 20 patients died. We compared patients with an abnormal microvolt T-wave alternans test to those with a normal (negative) test, and patients with a QRS >120 ms with those with a QRS 120 ms; the hazard ratios for 2-year mortality were 4.8 (P=0.020) and 1.5 (P=0.367), respectively. The actuarial mortality rate was substantially lower among patients with a normal microvolt T-wave alternans test (3.8%; 95% confidence interval: 0, 9.0) than the mortality rate in patients with a narrow QRS (12.0%; 95% confidence interval: 5.6, 18.5). The corresponding false-negative rates are 3.5% and 10.2%, respectively.

Conclusion— Among MADIT II–like patients, a microvolt T-wave alternans test is better than QRS duration at identifying a high-risk group and also better at identifying a low-risk group unlikely to benefit from ICD therapy.

Key Words: heart failure • coronary disease • death, sudden • heart arrest • defibrillation

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Appendix References

 
The Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) II showed that patients with prior myocardial infarction and a left ventricular ejection fraction 0.30 who were randomized to implanted cardiac defibrillator (ICD) therapy had an improved survival rate compared with those patients randomized to conventional medical therapy.¹ The absolute mortality reduction in MADIT II was 5.6% over an average of 20 months of follow-up. Consensus panels have accepted the scientific validity of the MADIT II results but have recognized the need for better methods of risk stratification.² In addition, many patients, physicians, healthcare insurers, and regulators have recognized not only the potential economic burden but also the potential adverse effects of implanting cardiac defibrillators in all patients who meet the MADIT II criteria.^3,4

On the basis of its analysis of the MADIT II data, the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) published in June 2003 its intent to issue a National Coverage Decision indicating that "there is adequate evidence to conclude that an ICD is reasonable and necessary in patients with prior myocardial infarction, an ejection fraction 0.30, and a QRS duration >120 ms."⁵ This decision effectively limits prophylactic treatment with an ICD to the one third of MADIT II patients with a QRS >120 ms. It is not clear, however, that patients with a QRS duration 120 ms truly represent a low-risk group; methods to select patients for ICD treatment should minimize the fraction of high-risk patients left unprotected.⁶

Microvolt T-wave alternans (MTWA) has the ability to identify patients at high risk for sudden cardiac death. In studies in animals⁷ and humans,^8–12 MTWA is strongly associated with an increased risk of reentrant ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Notably, a number of small studies in patients with heart failure have demonstrated that a normal MTWA test is associated with an extremely low mortality rate.⁹ We are conducting a multicenter, prospective study of the prognostic significance of MTWA in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Although the main study includes patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathies, this report analyzes a subgroup of patients who have ischemic heart disease and an ejection fraction 0.30 and who meet other MADIT II criteria (>1 month after a myocardial infarction and >3 months after coronary revascularization) to determine whether MTWA is superior to QRS duration for selecting a high-risk group likely to benefit from ICD prophylaxis and for excluding a low-risk group unlikely to benefit from ICD prophylaxis.

	Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Appendix References

 
The epidemiological study from which the present sample is drawn was conducted at 11 clinical centers in the United States. The institutional review board at each clinical center approved the protocol, and consent was obtained from all patients before their enrollment. The first patient was enrolled in November 1996 and the last in March 2003. Patients were eligible to participate in our epidemiological study if they were at least 18 years of age, had a left ventricular ejection fraction 0.40, had no history of a prior arrhythmic event, and were able to provide informed consent. Because MTWA can only be measured during a stable atrial rhythm, patients who had persistent atrial fibrillation or flutter or required ventricular pacing at the time of MTWA testing were excluded. Patients with unstable coronary artery disease or New York Heart Association functional class IV heart failure and those who were unable to exercise on a bicycle or treadmill were also excluded from the study. For this analysis, we selected the subset of patients who also met MADIT II criteria for ICD prophylaxis. During the baseline visit, a complete medical history and a 24-hour Holter ECG recording were obtained.

MTWA Testing
Patients had a MTWA exercise test (bicycle or treadmill) while taking their regular cardiovascular medications, including ß-blockers. Careful skin preparation, including mild abrasion and high-resolution electrodes (High-Res, Cambridge Heart, Inc), was performed to minimize noise. Electrocardiographic leads were placed at the standard 12-lead positions and in an orthogonal X,Y,Z configuration. Measurements were made with the CH2000 system or a HeartWave device (Cambridge Heart, Inc) and utilized a spectral method of analysis designed to allow detection of alternans in the microvolt range of amplitude. The MTWA test was automatically interpreted by the Alternans Report Classifier (Version D10) according to previously described criteria.¹³ Because previous studies showed that positive and indeterminate MTWA tests have similar mortality rates, all comparisons in this analysis were made between patients with normal (negative) and abnormal (positive or indeterminate) MTWA tests.

QRS Measurement
In the majority of patients, the QRS was measured electronically with the use of computerized ECG systems. If an automated analysis of QRS interval was not available, the ECG was printed out at 50 mm/s paper speed, and the QRS was measured manually with calipers by 2 individuals who were unaware of the clinical information or outcome of the patients. A third individual reviewed a random sample of the ECGs as well as all ECGs for which the 2 primary reviewers had discrepant values for QRS duration.

Follow-Up
The first scheduled follow-up visit occurred 1 month after the alternans test. After that, patients were followed up at 4-month intervals. Follow-up visits focused on reviewing patients’ interim medical and cardiovascular drug histories.

End Points
We used all-cause mortality as the end point for this analysis because it was the end point used in MADIT II.

Statistical Analyses
We classified MTWA tests as normal (negative) or abnormal (positive or indeterminate) and dichotomized QRS duration as 120 ms or as >120 ms. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to describe the survival experience for each MTWA and QRS duration group. The log-rank test was used to test the equality of the survival distributions for each risk predictor. Actuarial 24-month mortality was used to describe the outcome of patients classified by the different risk predictors. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio for mortality for the 2 risk predictors. Cox models were also used to estimate the hazard ratio for MTWA status and QRS duration adjusted for the other. The significance of each risk predictor adjusting for the other was assessed with likelihood ratio tests. All statistical tests were 2 tailed and used an level of 0.05.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Appendix References

 
Our study enrolled 587 patients, but 38 of these subsequently had a postenrollment exclusion (patients who consented to be in the study but withdrew or died before MTWA testing). Of the 549 evaluable patients, 177 had ischemic heart disease and an ejection fraction 0.30 and also met other MADIT II criteria. Follow-up was available for 99.4% of these patients, and mean follow-up duration was 20±6 months.

The clinical characteristics of the MADIT II–like patients are listed in Table 1. QRS duration was >120 ms in 32% of patients, and the MTWA test was abnormal in 68% of patients. The 2-year actuarial mortality rates for patients with positive and indeterminate MTWA tests were similar (14.5% and 20.1%, respectively).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 1. Baseline Clinical Characteristics of the 177 Patients*

For all 177 MADIT II–like patients, the actuarial 2-year mortality rate was 13.2%. We analyzed the difference in mortality between the 2 MTWA groups and between the 2 QRS duration groups (Figure, Table 2). According to log-rank tests, the 2-year actuarial mortality rate for patients with abnormal MTWA (17.8%) was significantly greater than for patients with normal MTWA (3.8%, P=0.020, hazard ratio 4.8). However, the mortality rate for patients with a QRS duration >120 ms (15.9%) was not significantly different than for patients with a QRS duration 120 ms (12.0%, P=0.367, hazard ratio 1.5).

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Kaplan-Meier mortality curves, stratified in the left panel by MTWA test results (normal versus abnormal) and in the right panel by QRS duration (120 ms versus >120 ms).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 2. Comparison of MTWA and QRS Duration

Notably, the 2-year actuarial mortality rate was substantially lower among patients with a normal MTWA test (3.8%; 95% confidence interval: 0.0, 9.0) than among patients with a narrow QRS (12.0%; 95% confidence interval: 5.6, 18.5), corresponding to false-negative rates of 3.5% and 10.2%, respectively. In other words, when trying to reassure patients with ischemic heart disease and severe left ventricular dysfunction that they may not require ICD therapy, a physician can say that there is a 95% chance that the 2-year mortality risk of a patient with a normal MTWA test is <9.0%, compared with a 95% chance that the 2-year mortality is <18.5% for patients with a QRS duration 120 ms. Among the 118 patients with a QRS duration of 120 ms (patients who would not qualify for ICD reimbursement on the basis of the current CMS guidelines), 12 died (12.0% actuarial 2-year mortality) and all but one had abnormal MTWA tests. Remarkably, patients with a normal T-wave alternans test and an ejection fraction 0.30 had a lower 2-year actuarial mortality rate than patients with an abnormal MTWA test and an ejection fraction between 0.31 and 0.40 (3.8% versus 9.2%, respectively). A QRS duration >120 ms was weakly associated with MTWA status (odds ratio 1.7, P=0.15). In a multivariate Cox model, MTWA remained a strong predictor of mortality (hazard ratio 4.7, P=0.012) after adjusting for QRS duration. QRS duration did not add significantly to prognostic information provided by T-wave alternans.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Appendix References

 
In our analysis of patients who fit the MADIT II criteria, patients with an abnormal MTWA exercise test had a substantially increased risk of dying, with a 2-year actuarial mortality rate of 17.8%, whereas patients with a normal MTWA test had a low 2-year actuarial mortality rate of 3.8%.

The results of this study are consistent with a retrospective meta-analysis¹⁴ of 2 observational studies that included patients without known prior sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias.^9,12 This meta-analysis reported the results of MTWA testing in 129 patients who were identified from the 2 studies that fit the MADIT II selection criteria (ischemic heart disease, ejection fraction 0.30). At 2 years’ follow-up, no sudden cardiac death or cardiac arrest was seen among patients with a normal MTWA test, compared with an event rate of 15.6% among the remaining patients with an abnormal MTWA test.¹⁴ The additional data from the present study more than double the published experience of MTWA in this MADIT II subgroup of patients and use all-cause mortality as the end point for a direct comparison with MADIT II (because all-cause mortality was the primary end point in MADIT II). Taken together, the data from our study and the data from The Lancet meta-analysis indicate that MTWA testing is highly effective for identifying patients who will not experience sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias during follow-up. In addition, the present study not only adds a more representative sample of this population of heart failure patients (because it included patients from 11 geographically distinct centers, including community-based cardiology practices), but also adds data on QRS duration in addition to MTWA, allowing for an analysis of the outcome of patients based on the current CMS guidelines.

A multivariate analysis in MADIT II showed that QRS duration >120 ms was an independent predictor of death, with a hazard ratio of 1.90 (95% confidence interval 1.14 to 3.14, P=0.013).⁶ Establishing a QRS duration >120 ms as an independent predictor of death, however, does not ensure that patients with a normal QRS duration are not at increased risk of dying. On the contrary, in MADIT II, patients with QRS duration 120 ms had a 2-year mortality rate of 14%, a finding confirmed by our study. Notably, in our study, MTWA classified as high risk those patients with a normal QRS duration who died during follow-up. These data indicate that MTWA is much better than QRS duration for identifying high-risk patients among those with ischemic heart disease and left ventricular ejection fraction 0.30. MTWA also is much more effective than QRS duration at identifying low-risk patients who are not likely to benefit from an ICD (Table 2). In our study, there were just 2 deaths within the first 2 years of follow-up among patients with a normal MTWA test.

For years, electrophysiological testing was considered the "gold standard" for identifying high-risk patients who would benefit from implantation of an ICD.^15,16 Electrophysiological testing was not performed routinely as part of either MADIT II or the present study because of several important limitations: First, in the Multicenter UnSustained Tachycardia Trial (MUSTT), two thirds of patients did not have inducible VT during an electrophysiological study but had a 12% 2-year arrhythmic event rate.¹⁶ This high false-negative rate is a limitation of electrophysiological testing in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Second, electrophysiological testing is invasive, expensive, done in a hospital setting, and therefore cumbersome as a screening tool. These concerns led directly to MADIT II, which attempted to identify high-risk patients by using only a simple noninvasive test, left ventricular ejection fraction. Like the determination of ejection fraction, MTWA can be done routinely in a doctor’s office by using modifications of currently available exercise testing equipment and is relatively inexpensive.

MADIT II unleashed a controversy about selection of patients for ICD prophylaxis. Unquestionably, MADIT II established a survival benefit for prophylactic ICDs in patients with ischemic heart disease and an ejection fraction 0.30. However, the absolute risk reduction in MADIT II was 5.6% over an average follow-up of 20 months. Accordingly, 18 ICDs must be implanted to save 1 life, and this modest benefit is offset by ICD-related adverse events.^17,18 Previous studies demonstrate that ICD therapy decreases quality of life as a result of a variety of problems.^18–21 In addition, society must bear the economic burden for treating so many patients who will not use their ICDs. It would be ideal to identify a subset of MADIT II–like patients unlikely to experience sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias to spare them an ICD implantation. The CMS decision to use QRS duration >120 ms to identify high-risk patients reduces the fraction who get ICDs to about one third of the total MADIT II group, but it fails to treat a substantial number of patients who would benefit from ICD prophylaxis. If, instead of QRS duration, MTWA testing were used to exclude a low-risk subset of the MADIT II population, about two thirds of patients would get ICD therapy, but those who did not would have minimal risk of experiencing ICD-preventable death. If this strategy were used, among the patients with an abnormal MTWA test, only 7 ICDs would have to be implanted to save 1 life.

	Conclusion

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Appendix References

 
Compared with QRS duration, an abnormal MTWA test is a stronger predictor of death in patients with ischemic heart disease and left ventricular dysfunction who fit MADIT II criteria. More importantly, MTWA can better identify a group of patients not likely to benefit from ICD therapy.

	Appendix

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Appendix References

 
The following people participated in this study (asterisks indicate principal investigators).

Columbia University, New York, NY: Daniel M. Bloomfield,* Carmen Castillo, Naresh Talathoti, Chandra Kunavarapu; New York Heart Center, Syracuse, NY: Jorge Davidenko,* Viki DiBiase, Mark Bovard; MetroHealth, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio: Elizabeth S. Kaufman,* Otto Costantini, Mary Dettmer, Linda Verrilli, Linda McCowen; Michigan Heart PC, Ypsilanti, Mich: Timothy Shinn,* Deborah Myers, Heidi Hanselman; Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa: John Fontaine,* LaTia Jones; University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla: Anne Curtis,* Anna Rahman, Pam Morgan; New York University, New York, NY: Douglas Holmes,* Aileen Ferrick, Sharda McGuire; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minn: Chuen Tang,* Julia Price, Nancy Threefoot; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa: Andrea Russo,* Isabel Matozzo; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa: Kelley Anderson,* Maria Hoffman; Krannert Institute of Cardiology, Indianapolis, Ind: William Groh,* Miriam Lowe; Data Coordinating Center and Research Holter Laboratory, Columbia University, New York, NY: Daniel Bloomfield,* J. Thomas Bigger Jr., Pearila B. Namerow, Richard C. Steinman, Carmen Castillo, Michael Parides, Naresh Talathoti, Chandra Kunavarapu, Paul Gonzalez.

	Acknowledgments

 
This study was supported by grants HL-64862 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 5 M01 RR-00645, Division of Research Resources, General Clinical Research Centers Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md; a grant from the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation; and a grant from Cambridge Heart, Inc, Bedford, Mass. This article was written with the use of data from version 2.0 of The MTWA in CHF database.

Disclosure

Dr Bloomfield has received research support from Cambridge Heart, Inc, has been an investigator in other clinical trials of T-wave alternans sponsored by Cambridge Heart, Inc, has been an occasional consultant to Cambridge Heart, Inc, and has been on the Speakers’ Bureau for Cambridge Heart, Inc. Dr Bloomfield does not hold and has never held any equity interest in Cambridge Heart, Inc, nor has he held any position with Cambridge Heart, Inc. Dr Bloomfield currently works for Merck Research Laboratories but continues to be an Adjunct Associate Professor of Medicine at Columbia University.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Appendix References

 

1. Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, et al. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 877–883.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
2. Gregoratos G, Abrams J, Epstein AE, et al. ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices–summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 40: 1703–1719.[Free Full Text]
   
3. Bigger JT. Expanding indications for implantable cardiac defibrillators. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 931–933.[Free Full Text]
   
4. Buxton AE. The clinical use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: where are we now? Where should we go? Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138: 512–514.
   
5. Decision Memorandum: National Coverage Determination on Implantable Defibrillators. Washington, DC: Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services, 2003. Available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/coverage/download/id39-5.pdf. Accessed December 5, 2003.
   
6. Zareba W. Noninvasive electrocardiography and outcome in MADIT II patients. Presented at the Late-Breaking Clinical Trials session of the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology Annual Scientific Sessions, San Diego, Calif, May 8–11, 2002.
   
7. Smith JM, Clancy EA, Valeri CR, et al. Electrical alternans and cardiac electrical instability. Circulation. 1988; 77: 110–121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
8. Hohnloser SH, Klingenheben T, Li YG, et al. T wave alternans as a predictor of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias in ICD recipients: prospective comparison with conventional risk markers. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998; 9: 1258–1268.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
   
9. Klingenheben T, Zabel M, D’Agostino RB et al. Predictive value of T-wave alternans for arrhythmic events in patients with congestive heart failure. Lancet. 2000; 356: 651–652.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
   
10. Rosenbaum DS, Jackson LE, Smith JM, et al. Electrical alternans and vulnerability to ventricular arrhythmias. N Engl J Med. 1994; 330: 235–241.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
11. Gold MR, Bloomfield DM, Anderson KP, et al. A comparison of T-wave alternans, signal averaged electrocardiography and programmed ventricular stimulation for arrhythmia risk stratification. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 2247–2253.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
12. Ikeda T, Saito H, Tanno K, et al. T-wave alternans as a predictor for sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 89: 79–82.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
13. Bloomfield DM, Hohnloser SH, Cohen RJ. Interpretation and classification of microvolt T wave alternans tests. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002; 13: 502–512.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
14. Hohnloser SH, Ikeda T, Bloomfield DM, et al. T-wave alternans negative coronary patients with low ejection and benefit from defibrillator implantation. Lancet. 2003; 362: 125–126.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
15. Moss A, Hall W, Cannom D, et al. Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary artery disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335: 1933–1940.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
16. Buxton A, Lee K, DiCarlo L, et al. Electrophysiologic testing to identify patients with coronary artery disease who are at high risk for sudden death. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 1937–1945.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
17. Rosenqvist M, Beyer T, Block M, et al; on behalf of the European 7219 Jewel ICD Investigators. Adverse events with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a prospective multicenter study. Circulation. 1998; 98: 663–670.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
18. Kron J, Herre J, Renfroe EG, and the AVID Investigators. Lead and device related complications in the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillator Trial. Am Heart J. 2001; 141: 92–98.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
19. Namerow PB, Firth BR, Heywood GM, et al. Quality-of-life six months after CABG surgery in patients randomized to ICD versus no ICD therapy: findings from the CABG Patch Trial. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999; 22: 1305–1313.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
20. Schron EB, Exner DV, Yao Q, et al. Quality of life in the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators trials: impact of therapy and influence of adverse symptoms and defibrillator shocks. Circulation. 2002; 105: 589–594.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
21. Irvine J, Dorian P, Baker B, et al. Quality of life in the Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS). Am Heart J. 2002; 144: 282–289.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. M. Scheinman and E. Keung The Year in Review of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 27, 2008; 51(21): 2075 - 2081. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. C. Myles, C. E. Jackson, I. Tsorlalis, M. C. Petrie, J. J. V. McMurray, and S. M. Cobbe Is Microvolt T-Wave Alternans the Answer to Risk Stratification in Heart Failure? Circulation, December 18, 2007; 116(25): 2984 - 2991. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. V. Exner, K. M. Kavanagh, M. P. Slawnych, L. B. Mitchell, D. Ramadan, S. G. Aggarwal, C. Noullett, A. Van Schaik, R. T. Mitchell, M. A. Shibata, et al. Noninvasive Risk Assessment Early After a Myocardial Infarction: The REFINE Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 11, 2007; 50(24): 2275 - 2284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. M. De Ferrari, R. Rordorf, F. Frattini, B. Petracci, P. De Filippo, and M. Landolina Predictive value of programmed ventricular stimulation in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy: implications for the selection of candidates for an implantable defibrillator Europace, December 1, 2007; 9(12): 1151 - 1157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Gallagher, M. Padula, M. Sgueglia, L. Santini, P. Voci, N. G. Mahon, Y. G. Yap, and F. Romeo Electrocardiographic markers of structural heart disease and predictors of death in 2332 unselected patients undergoing outpatient Holter recording Europace, December 1, 2007; 9(12): 1203 - 1208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Salerno-Uriarte, G. M. De Ferrari, C. Klersy, R. F.E. Pedretti, M. Tritto, L. Sallusti, L. Libero, G. Pettinati, G. Molon, A. Curnis, et al. Prognostic Value of T-Wave Alternans in Patients With Heart Failure Due to Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy: Results of the ALPHA Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 6, 2007; 50(19): 1896 - 1904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Santini, C. Lavalle, and R. P. Ricci Primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death: who should get an ICD? Heart, November 1, 2007; 93(11): 1478 - 1483. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Worck, J. Haarbo, and P. E. B. Thomsen Electrophysiological study and 'slow' ventricular tachycardia predict appropriate therapy: results from a single-centre implantable cardiac defibrillator follow-up Europace, November 1, 2007; 9(11): 1048 - 1053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-P. Couderc, W. Zareba, S. McNitt, P. Maison-Blanche, and A. J. Moss Repolarization variability in the risk stratification of MADIT II patients Europace, September 1, 2007; 9(9): 717 - 723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Passman and A. Kadish Sudden Death Prevention With Implantable Devices Circulation, July 31, 2007; 116(5): 561 - 571. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Klingenheben Microvolt T-Wave Alternans for Arrhythmia Risk Stratification in Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Which Patients Benefit? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 10, 2007; 50(2): 174 - 175. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Cantillon, K. M. Stein, S. M. Markowitz, S. Mittal, B. K. Shah, D. P. Morin, E. S. Zacks, M. Janik, S. Ageno, A. C. Mauer, et al. Predictive Value of Microvolt T-Wave Alternans in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 10, 2007; 50(2): 166 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Klingenheben Arrhythmia Risk Prediction in Patients With Preserved Left Ventricular Function: The Final Frontier? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 8, 2006; (2006) j.jacc.2006.08.025v1. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Ikeda, H. Yoshino, K. Sugi, K. Tanno, H. Shimizu, J. Watanabe, Y. Kasamaki, A. Yoshida, and T. Kato Predictive Value of Microvolt T-Wave Alternans for Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients With Preserved Cardiac Function After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results of a Collaborative Cohort Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 8, 2006; (2006) j.jacc.2006.06.075v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. S. Kaufman, D. M. Bloomfield, R. C. Steinman, P. B. Namerow, O. Costantini, R. J. Cohen, and J. T. Bigger Jr "Indeterminate" Microvolt T-Wave Alternans Tests Predict High Risk of Death or Sustained Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 3, 2006; 48(7): 1399 - 1404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. C. Stecker, M. Zargarian, V. Dogra, B. T. John, J. Kron, J. H. McAnulty, and S. S. Chugh Native QRS duration predicts the occurrence of arrhythmic events in ICD recipients Europace, October 1, 2006; 8(10): 859 - 862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Developed in Collaboration With the European Heart, D. P. Zipes, A. J. Camm, M. Borggrefe, A. E. Buxton, B. Chaitman, M. Fromer, G. Gregoratos, G. Klein, A. J. Moss, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 5, 2006; 48(5): e247 - e346. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Writing Committee Members, D. P. Zipes, A. J. Camm, M. Borggrefe, A. E. Buxton, B. Chaitman, M. Fromer, G. Gregoratos, G. Klein, A. J. Moss, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death) Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society Europace, September 1, 2006; 8(9): 746 - 837. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. S. Chan, K. Stein, T. Chow, M. Fendrick, J. T. Bigger, and S. Vijan Cost-Effectiveness of a Microvolt T-Wave Alternans Screening Strategy for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Placement in the MADIT-II-Eligible Population J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 4, 2006; 48(1): 112 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Chow, D. J. Kereiakes, C. Bartone, T. Booth, E. J. Schloss, T. Waller, E. S. Chung, S. Menon, B. K. Nallamothu, and P. S. Chan Prognostic Utility of Microvolt T-Wave Alternans in Risk Stratification of Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 2, 2006; 47(9): 1820 - 1827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Goldberger and R. Lampert Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Expanding Indications and Technologies JAMA, February 15, 2006; 295(7): 809 - 818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. Bloomfield, J. T. Bigger, R. C. Steinman, P. B. Namerow, M. K. Parides, A. B. Curtis, E. S. Kaufman, J. M. Davidenko, T. S. Shinn, and J. M. Fontaine Microvolt T-Wave Alternans and the Risk of Death or Sustained Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 17, 2006; 47(2): 456 - 463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Narayan T-Wave Alternans and the Susceptibility to Ventricular Arrhythmias J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 17, 2006; 47(2): 269 - 281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. S. Chauhan, E. Downar, K. Nanthakumar, J. D. Parker, H. J. Ross, W. Chan, and P. Picton Increased ventricular repolarization heterogeneity in patients with ventricular arrhythmia vulnerability and cardiomyopathy: a human in vivo study Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2006; 290(1): H79 - H86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Gehi, D. Haas, and V. Fuster Primary Prophylaxis With the Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: The Need for Improved Risk Stratification JAMA, August 24, 2005; 294(8): 958 - 960. [Full Text] [PDF]

A. K. Gehi, R. H. Stein, L. D. Metz, and J. A. Gomes Microvolt T-Wave Alternans for the Risk Stratification of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmic Events: A Meta-Analysis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 5, 2005; 46(1): 75 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]