Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2004;110:1694-1700
Published online before print September 7, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000142290.35842.B0
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
110/12/1694    most recent
01.CIR.0000142290.35842.B0v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ho, V. B.
Right arrow Articles by Bondy, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ho, V. B.
Right arrow Articles by Bondy, C. A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Genetics Home Reference
Medline Plus Health Information
*MRI Scans
*Turner Syndrome
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical genetics
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Pediatric and congenital heart disease, including cardiovascular surgery
Right arrow Cardiac development

(Circulation. 2004;110:1694-1700.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Vascular Medicine

Major Vascular Anomalies in Turner Syndrome

Prevalence and Magnetic Resonance Angiographic Features

Vincent B. Ho, MD; Vladimir K. Bakalov, MD; Margaret Cooley, BA; Phillip L. Van, MS; Maureen N. Hood, MS, RN; Thomas R. Burklow, MD; Carolyn A. Bondy, MD

From the Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (V.B.H., M.N.H.) and Pediatrics (T.R.B.), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md; Diagnostic Radiology Department (V.B.H., M.N.H.), Warren G. Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md; and Developmental Endocrinology Branch (V.K.B., M.C., P.L.V., C.A.B.), National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.

Correspondence to Vincent B. Ho, MD, Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Rd, Bethesda, MD 20814. E-mail vho{at}usuhs.mil or vho@nih.gov

Received January 23, 2004; de novo received April 19, 2004; accepted June 22, 2004.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Turner syndrome (TS) is associated with aortic coarctation and dissection; hence, echocardiographic evaluation of all patients is currently recommended. X-ray angiography in clinically symptomatic patients has suggested a range of other vascular anomalies, but the true prevalence of such lesions in TS is unknown. To better understand the prevalence and pathogenesis of cardiovascular defects in TS, we prospectively evaluated a group of asymptomatic adult volunteers with TS using magnetic resonance (MR) angiography.

Methods and Results— A total of 85 adults with TS and 27 normal female adult volunteers underwent gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography. A high prevalence of aortic anomalies was seen in women with TS, including elongation of the transverse arch (49%), aortic coarctation (12%), and aberrant right subclavian artery (8%). Venous anomalies were also prominent, including persistent left superior vena cava (13%) and partial anomalous pulmonary venous return (13%). None of these anomalies were found in healthy female controls. The constellation of elongation of the transverse arch, aortic coarctation, and persistent left superior vena cava was significantly associated with women with TS. Neck webbing and increased thoracic anterior-to-posterior dimension diameters were strong predictors for arterial and venous anomalies.

Conclusions— Thoracic vascular anomalies are common in TS, occurring in {approx}50% of a group not preselected for cardiovascular disease. The highly significant association between neck webbing, increased chest diameter, and these vascular anomalies suggests that in utero, centrally localized lymphatic obstruction may contribute to these cardiovascular deformities in TS. Improved recognition of these often-undetected vascular lesions may be important for identification of patients in need of closer cardiovascular monitoring.


Key Words: Turner syndrome • angiography • magnetic resonance imaging • aorta • veins


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Originally described in 1938 by Henry Turner,1 Turner syndrome (TS), or monosomy X, results from complete or partial monosomy for the X chromosome. This is a relatively common chromosomal disorder, affecting {approx}1 in 2500 live female births. The most common features are short stature and gonadal dysgenesis, but the most serious clinical aspect of the syndrome is due to congenital cardiovascular anomalies that include, most critically, aortic coarctation and dissection.2–7 Over the years, the reported incidence of cardiovascular lesions has varied from 23%8 to as high as 45%.2 Variations in incidence are attributable to variations in noninvasive methods used for screening and the types of lesions that they can characterize. Using echocardiography and black-blood T1-weighted spin-echo MRI in a group not selected for cardiovascular disease, Dawson-Falk et al2 reported a 45% prevalence of cardiovascular lesions, with bicuspid aortic valve (17.5%), aortic coarctation (12.5%), and persistent left superior vena cava (LSVC; 5%) representing some of the more common lesions. However, TS has also been associated with other arterial and venous anomalies, notably anomalous pulmonary venous return4,8–13 and pseudocoarctation of the aorta.14–17

A more comprehensive angiographic characterization of the variety and incidence of arterial and venous structural anomalies of TS, however, has yet to be described. This is understandable given the relative risks associated with conventional catheter angiography, which has precluded its use for routine screening in asymptomatic patients with TS. However, recent improvements in magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), namely, the development of gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced 3D MRA technique,18–21 have enabled the reliable depiction of arterial and venous anatomy without the inherent risks and clinical concerns of catheter x-ray angiography. On most current magnetic resonance (MR) scanners, Gd-enhanced 3D MRA can be performed within a single breath hold and can provide high spatial resolution angiographic delineation that rivals that of conventional x-ray angiography but without the concerns of radiation exposure, catheter placement, contrast media anaphylaxis, or nephrotoxicity. In the present study, we evaluated the spectrum, prevalence, and associations of thoracic arterial and venous anomalies in a group of adults with TS, not selected for cardiovascular disease, and investigated their association with a variety of clinical parameters.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Eighty-five adult patients (average age 37±11 years) with karyotypically proven TS and 27 healthy female subjects (aged 36±10 years) provided written informed consent for voluntary participation in this study protocol approved by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Institutional Review Board. Study participants were largely self-referred, having learned about the study through the NICHD and TS World Wide Web–site notices. We did not recruit subjects through medical specialists.

Imaging was performed on a 1.5-T MR scanner (Signa, General Electric Medical Systems) with a phased-array coil and included axial and coronal T1-weighted fast spin echo and oblique sagittal fast gradient echo pulse sequences. Gd-enhanced 3D MRA was performed with a fast sagittal or oblique sagittal 3D spoiled gradient echo pulse sequence (repetition time, 6.2 to 7.3 ms; echo time, 1.2 to 2.2 ms; flip angle, 20° to 30°; partition thickness, 2.0 to 2.6 mm; number of acquisitions, 1; field of view, 28 to 35 cm; acquisition matrix, 256x128 to 256; acquisition time, 20 to 29 seconds) and a 0.2-mmol/kg dose of Gd-chelate contrast media administered via an antecubital vein with an MR-compatible injector (Spectris, Medrad). Zero filling (ZIP 512, General Electric Medical Systems) was implemented when available. Timing of the initial "arterial-phase" Gd-enhanced 3D MRA was achieved with an automated bolus detection scheme (MR SMARTPREP, General Electric Medical Systems) with the monitoring volume placed within the aortic arch. Postcontrast delayed phase imaging included axial fat-suppressed spoiled gradient echo images (repetition time, 150 ms; echo time, 1.3 to 1.4 ms; flip angle, 75°; slice thickness, 7 to 10 mm; number of acquisitions, 1; field of view 28 to 39 cm; acquisition matrix, 256x192).

In 6 patients with partial anomalous pulmonary venous return (PAPVR), oblique axial cine phase-contrast imaging (velocity encoding, 200 cm/s; direction, through-plane; repetition time, 33 ms; echo time, 6.2 or 6.3 ms; flip angle, 20°; slice thickness, 7 mm; matrix, 256x128; field of view, 25 to 35 cm) was performed through the base of the heart. Blood flow though the aortic root (systemic flow or Qs) and the pulmonary artery (pulmonary flow or Qp) was measured from phase-contrast phase map images with flow analysis software (Cine Tool, General Electric Medical Systems) on an independent computer workstation.

Evaluation of the MR images was performed blinded to each subject’s clinical presentation and past cardiovascular history. Images were evaluated for the presence of arterial and venous anomaly. In each subject, the maximum superior-to-inferior dimension (SI), maximum anterior-to-posterior dimension (AP) and maximum right-to-left dimension (RL) of the thoracic cavity were measured from T1-weighted fast spin echo images. Body surface area (BSA) was calculated with the equation BSA (in m2)=71.84x(weight [in kg])0.425x(height [in cm])0.725; body mass index (BMI) using the equation: BMI (in kg/m2)=weight (in kg)/height (in meters)2. The thoracic volume for each subject was calculated from MR measurements of the internal thoracic dimensions using the equation of a half ellipsoid: thoracic volume=1/2x4/3x{pi}xSIxAPxRL. Normalization of thoracic diameters and volume for body surface was performed in the following way: Pn=PxBSA/1.73, where Pn denotes normalized parameter, (eg, AP diameter or volume), P is the measured parameter, and 1.73 is the standard BSA.

Continuous data are expressed as mean with SD. Nominal data are expressed as numbers and percent. Comparison between group means was made by 1-way ANOVA with Fisher’s protected least significant difference, after log transformation of data that were not normally distributed. Associations were tested by {chi}2 and Fisher’s exact test. Contribution of multiple variables in explaining the presence of a particular anomaly was tested by multiple forward stepwise regression in a linear model. Statistical significance was accepted if the probability value was <0.05. Analysis was performed with standard statistical software (SigmaStat, version 2.0, SPSS Inc).


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Subject Characteristics
Study subject characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The 2 groups were similar in age, but as expected, women with TS were shorter (P<0.0001) and had smaller mean BSA (P=0.008). Thoracic cavity dimensions were determined to investigate whether reduced chest size could contribute to developmental anomalies of the great vessels. As expected, thoracic width and height were reduced in TS (Table 1), but when corrected for BSA, the width was actually relatively increased in TS (270±29 versus 241±14 mm, P<0.05), and the height was not different from controls. In contrast, thoracic AP diameter was significantly greater in women with TS, even without correction for body size (Table 1). Thoracic volume was not significantly smaller in TS when corrected for BSA (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Study Subject Characteristics

Arterial Anomalies
The aortic arch was noted to course normally to the left in all subjects. No subjects were noted to have an aortic dissection or aneurysm (aortic diameter ≥5 cm22). The vascular anomalies detected in women with TS and controls are summarized in Table 2. In women with TS, the most common arterial finding was elongation of the transverse arch (ETA; 42/85, 49%), which was typically seen as increased distance between the origins of the left common carotid and the left subclavian arteries, with flattening of the arch and kinking along its lesser curvature (Figure 1), a feature sometimes referred also as "pseudocoarctation."16,17 ETA was defined by the presence of both (1) posterior origin of the left subclavian artery behind the trachea on axial images and (2) inward indentation or convex kinking of the inferior aortic contour along the lesser curvature. Coarctation of the aorta was the second most common arterial finding, detected in 10 subjects (12%). Coarctation (Figure 2) was defined by the presence of both (1) concentric narrowing of the aorta (typically juxtaductal in location) and (2) a posterior "shelf" along the distal cephalic aortic contour.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Thoracic Vessel Anomalies in Women With TS and Healthy Volunteers



View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Thirty-year-old TS patient with ETA. Gd-enhanced 3D MRA (A, sagittal maximum intensity projection) demonstrates flat and elongated transverse arch (large arrow) with associated characteristic kink in lesser curvature (small arrow). Patient was also noted to have aberrant right subclavian artery (*) on coronal subvolume maximum intensity projection (B) from Gd-enhanced 3D MRA. Subject also had bilateral vena cava (arrows), ie, persistent LSVC, as seen on reformatted coronal (C) and axial (D) postcontrast fat-suppressed spoiled gradient echo images.



View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Thirty-nine-year-old TS patient with "occult" coarctation of aorta. Sagittal subvolume maximum intensity projection from Gd-enhanced 3D MRA demonstrates juxtaductal coarctation (*) with post–stenotic dilatation and posterior "shelf" (arrow). Note associated elongation of transverse arch (arrow head) with separation of left subclavian artery (L) origin from that of left common carotid artery (C), which has common origin with innominate artery (ie, bovine arch).

Four women with TS with coarctation identified on MRA had a prior history of coarctation repair. In the remaining 6 subjects, the coarctation detected on MRA was clinically undetected or silent. None of the subjects with coarctation had dilated collaterals on Gd-enhanced 3D MRA or evidence of a flow jet on fast gradient echo pulse sequences to suggest a hemodynamically significant narrowing. The blood pressures of patients with TS were correlated with the presence of coarctation and ETA (Table 3). Of note, the patients with ETA (which included all coarctation patients; Figure 2) were found to have statistically significantly higher systolic and diastolic blood pressures than those without ETA. None of the healthy female cohort had either ETA or coarctation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Blood Pressure vs Aortic Abnormality in Women With TS

Of the aberrant arch vessel anomalies, aberrant right subclavian artery was found in 8% of women with TS but not in any control subjects, but this anomaly has been reported to occur in 0.4% to 2% of the normal population.23 The occurrence of an aberrant right subclavian artery in subjects with TS has potential clinical importance, because it may mask the presence of coarctation if the right upper extremity alone is chosen for measurement of an upper extremity/lower extremity blood pressure difference.24 The incidence of common origins of the innominate and left common carotid artery from the aortic arch (also known as "bovine arch") and anomalous origin of the left vertebral arteries was similar between TS and healthy females (Table 2).

Venous Anomalies
The prevalence of major thoracic vein anomalies was also increased in women with TS (Table 2). A persistent LSVC (Figure 1) and PAPVR (Figure 3) were each found in 11 (13%) of 85 women. The PAPVR was most commonly from the left upper lobe (8/11) to the left brachiocephalic vein. These anomalies were not found in the normal female controls. The Qp/Qs measurements were performed in 6 patients with PAPVR (average Qp/Qs 1.1±0.2). The highest Qp/Qs ratio was 1.4 (Figure 3). None of the patients presented with clinical features referable to significant left-to-right shunting.



View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Fifty-six-year-old TS patient with left upper lobe PAPVR. On Gd-enhanced 3D MRA, anomalous vessel is seen between aortic arch and left pulmonary artery (A, thick sagittal maximum intensity projection; B, thin sagittal maximum intensity projection) corresponding to anomalous left-upper-lobe pulmonary vein (arrow) draining into left brachiocephalic vein (LBV). Flow analysis using cine phase-contrast imaging (not shown) estimated Qp/Qs ratio to be 1.4.

Associations
The presence of coarctation was always associated with ETA (Table 4). In addition, the presence of an LSVC was significantly associated with ETA (P=0.003) and with an aberrant right subclavian artery (P=0.01). ETA was an isolated anomaly in {approx}50% of subjects with this finding, as was PAPVR (Table 4). In contrast, a persistent LSVC and aberrant right subclavian artery were always associated with other anomalies.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Prevalence, Combinations, and Associations of Major Vessel Abnormalities in TS

The presence of neck webbing was significantly associated with coarctation, ETA, PAPVR, and LSVC (P<0.05; Table 4). Comparison of thoracic measurements (SI, AP, RL, and thoracic volume) demonstrated a significant association only between AP diameter and ETA ({chi}2 7.1, P=0.008). Of the group with TS, 54 of 85 had a karyotype 45X (fewer than 10% of other cell lines on a 50-cell peripheral karyotype). This karyotype was significantly associated with ETA, coarctation, LSVC, and PAPVR (P<0.05). The contributions of age, BSA, thoracic cage diameters, karyotype, and neck webbing to the likelihood of finding ETA were analyzed by forward stepwise regression analysis in a linear model. Only 2 variables, neck webbing (P=0.036) and AP thoracic diameter (P=0.002), were significantly associated with ETA. Similar analyses for the other major vessel anomalies were limited because of small numbers and underspecified models.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
This is the first MRA study to evaluate the anatomy of thoracic great vessels in TS. This angiographic study has demonstrated a high prevalence of unsuspected structural abnormalities of the thoracic vessels in women with TS. Most prominently, we found that roughly half had marked structural deviations of the aortic arch, described here as ETA, and 7% had an unsuspected coarctation of the aorta. This is in line with an earlier MR study reporting 3 of 40 such "silent" lesions.2 Coarctation was always found in the context of ETA, which suggests that similar pathogenetic processes contribute to these anomalies. Although this association of aortic anomalies might have been expected, we also found a significant association between the presence of ETA and the persistence of an LSVC, for which the pathogenetic connection is not so obvious. We do not think that the extraordinarily high prevalence of vascular anomalies found in the present study is due to a bias toward more severely affected patients in our study population. Our subjects were largely self-referred, and most traveled a fair distance to the Washington, DC metropolitan area to participate, so if any bias affected our recruitment, it was likely toward healthier, more functional people. Few study subjects were followed up by cardiologists, and {approx}30% had never before had any cardiac imaging.

A leading hypothesis concerning the origin of congenital cardiovascular malformations in TS posits a relation to the lymphatic hypoplasia/obstruction that affects a large proportion of 45X fetuses. Clark25 initially suggested that jugular lymphatic obstruction in utero resulted in dilated lymphatic vessels around the aortic root that, as a matter of speculation, might compress developing outflow structures, resulting in a range of aortic deformations. This theory further proposes that aortic root compression results in decreased blood flow across the transverse arch and isthmus and thus contributes to aortic arch hypoplasia and coarctation. However, there is no direct evidence for compression of the aortic root in TS, and additional studies have found a hypoplastic left heart in a number of 45X fetuses, which suggests that the defect lies further upstream.26

Shinebourne and Elseed27 theorized that coarctation results from altered flow patterns due to a left-sided blockage within the fetal circulation, which in turn results in elevated pulmonary and ductus arteriosus blood flow. Abnormal flow via the ductus to the isthmic portion of the arch is predicted to produce hypoplasia, tortuosity, and/or coarctation of the aorta in the juxtaductal region. The reduction of left heart blood flow suggested by this theory could explain the left heart hypoplasia noted above. The present study adds important new elements to this discussion on the origin of congenital cardiovascular defects in TS. We have shown that a persistent LSVC is linked to aortic anomalies in TS and that neck webbing, the postnatal residua of fetal lymphedema, is significantly associated not only with ETA and coarctation but also with the venous anomalies LSVC and PAPVR. Thus, the present study shows that the pathogenetic process leading to cardiovascular malformation in TS involves both the major inflow and outflow tracts of the heart and occurs most often in fetuses with lymphedema. A possible explanation for the statistically significant association between left- and right-sided cardiovascular defects noted in the present study could be that obstruction to forward flow caused by lymphatic compression of the developing left ventricle/aortic root results in back pressure or congestion in the fetal inflow structures, resulting in persistent anomalies of major thoracic venous structures.

Many TS patients are reported to have a "shield-like" chest.3 We investigated the possibility that a disproportion between thoracic cage and great vessel development might explain some of the observed vascular anomalies. Interestingly, and contrary to our expectations, we found that chest AP diameter is increased in women with thoracic vascular anomalies (ETA). It appears possible that an increased AP dimension may reflect the presence of an intrathoracic lymphocele during fetal development, representing another potential linkage between fetal lymphedema and congenital cardiovascular defects.

Aortic arch malformations such as ETA and coarctation in a region subject to high-flow velocity and shear stress may cause alterations in flow patterns that could have clinical consequences. It is interesting that systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly higher in women with ETA. The significance of this is unknown but is intriguing. There are many potential causes of hypertension in women with TS: endothelial, neurohormonal, and coarctation of the aorta. It is recognized that the elastic wall properties of the aorta in coarctation are abnormal28–31; alterations in vascular wall compliance itself can lead to hypertension. It is possible that changes in vascular wall compliance may accompany the anatomic aberrations in the aorta and its arch vessels, leading to the findings of elevated blood pressure, even in the absence of a clinically significant aortic coarctation. Further evaluation using dynamic measurement of blood flow across the transverse arch may prove insightful as to the true significance of this finding. It is also notable that the patients with previously undiagnosed coarctation of the aorta, albeit only 6 subjects, also were noted to have elevated diastolic blood pressures.

One of the greatest concerns in TS is the risk of aortic dissection, which affects 1% to 2% of this population.32,33 There has never been a prospective study of risk factors for aortic dissection in TS, but retrospective analyses32,33 suggest that hypertension, coarctation, and bicuspid aortic valve are risk factors in TS, as in nonsyndromic aortic dissection. However, {approx}10% of cases do not have any apparent risk factors, and it thus appears possible that clinically silent anomalies such as ETA and coarctation, as documented in the present study, could predispose to aortic dissection in TS. The anatomic distribution of reported dissections (ie, aortic root, ascending aorta, transverse arch, and descending aorta33) suggests that the entire thoracic aorta is at risk. Improved recognition of aortic structural anomalies in patients with TS may provide additional insight for surveillance guidelines in TS. Further studies, including the evaluation of blood flow patterns across the transverse arch and tracking the evolution of arch morphology, blood flow patterns, and systemic blood pressure over time, are required to more accurately assess the clinical significance of these novel findings.

Previous reports have rarely noted venous abnormalities in TS. Dawson-Falk et al2 report 2 of 40 subjects with a persistent LSVC, and Prandstraller et al34 reported <3% prevalence for PAPVR. In the present series, both venous anomalies were rather more common, with each occurring in roughly 13% of patients. The apparent higher incidence of these venous abnormalities in the present study may be attributed to the improved ability to detect venous anatomy using Gd-enhanced 3D MRA,21 especially for identification of PAPVR, which may be subtle on other forms of imaging. As in other reported cases,10–13,35 the finding of anomalous venous return was typically isolated and was not associated with intracardiac defects such as sinus venosus atrial septal defect, as seen in non-TS subjects.36 Moreover, PAPVR was typically left-sided (ie, anomalous left pulmonary vein) in patients with TS, which also differs from that of non-TS patients, in whom it is typically right-sided.36 Patients in the present study with TS and PAPVR presented clinically in a very similar manner to those reported previously10–13,35 in that their left-to-right shunt (average Qp/Qs 1.1) was not large and their lesions were otherwise not evident clinically. PAPVR, however, has been reported to occasionally appear with more dramatic consequences if the left-to-right shunt is large. Price and Willey37 reported 2 adult patients (ages 35 and 47 years) with TS (from a series of 135 patients with TS) who presented with congestive heart failure secondary to significant left-to-right shunting by large PAPVR lesions.

The present study shows that Gd-enhanced 3D MRA can provide meaningful angiographic depiction of arterial and venous anomalies that may have important clinical implications for the management of patients with TS. Current guidelines for management of patients with TS recommend echocardiographic imaging with possible MR assessment in patients with suspicion of cardiovascular manifestation.38 Given the high prevalence of unanticipated aortic and venous anomalies in the present study population, attention for these anomalies is advised. Although many of the lesions described may be identified with traditional black-blood spin echo and bright-blood gradient echo pulse sequences, the performance of contrast-enhanced MRA might be beneficial, especially in problematic cases.


*    Footnotes
 
The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the views of the Department of Defense or the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Turner HHA. Syndrome of infantilism, congenital webbed neck and cubitus valgus. Endocrinology. 1938; 23: 566–574.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Dawson-Falk KL, Wright AM, Bakker B, Pitlick PT, Rosenfeld RG. Cardiovascular evaluation in Turner syndrome: utility of MR imaging. Australas Radiol. 1992; 36: 204–209.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Haddad HM, Wilkins L. Congenital anomalies associated with gonadal aplasia. Pediatrics. 1959; 23: 885–902.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Lemli L, Smith DW. The XO syndrome: a study of the differentiated phenotype in 25 patients. J Pediatr. 1963; 63: 577–588.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Rainier-Pope CR, Cuningham RD, Nada AS, Crigler JF. Cardiovascular malformations in Turner’s syndrome. Pediatrics. 1964; 33: 919–925.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Emerit I, De Grouchy J, Vernant P, Corone P. Chromosomal abnormalities and congenital heart disease. Circulation. 1967; 36: 886–905.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Van der Hauwaert LG, Fruns JP, Doumoulin M, Logge N. Cardiovascular malformations in Turner’s and Noonan’s syndrome. Br Heart J. 1978; 40: 500–509.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Mazzanti L, Cacciari E. Congenital heart disease in patients with Turner’s syndrome: Italian Study Group for Turner Syndrome (ISGTS). J Pediatr. 1998; 133: 688–692.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Mazzanti L, Prandstraller D, Taddinari D, Rubino I, Santucci S, Picchio FM, Forabosco A, Cacciari E. Heart disease in Turner’s syndrome. Helv Paediatr Acta. 1988; 43: 25–31.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Moore JW, Kirby WC, Rogers WM, Poth MA. Partial anomalous pulmonary venous drainage associated with 45,X Turner’s syndrome. Pediatrics. 1990; 86: 273–276.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Herer B, Housset C, Chretien J. Partial anomalous pulmonary venous drainage in a patient with Turner’s syndrome. Respiration. 1991; 58: 327–328.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. van Wassenaer AG, Lubbers LJ, Losekoot G. Partial abnormal pulmonary venous return in Turner syndrome. Eur J Pediatr. 1988; 148: 101–103.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Subramaniam PN. Turner’s syndrome and cardiovascular anomalies: a case report and review of the literature. Am J med Sci. 1989; 297: 260–262.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Wolf WJ. Pseudocoarctation of the aortic arch in a patient with Turner’s syndrome. Clin Cardiol. 1986; 9: 37–38.

15. Klein LW, Levin JL, Weintraub WS, Agarwal JB, Helfant RH. Pseudocoarctation of the aortic arch in a patient with Turner’s syndrome. Clin Cardiol. 1984; 7: 621–623.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Smyth PT, Edwards JE. Pseudocoarctation, kinking or buckling of the aorta. Circulation. 1972; 46: 1027–1032.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Lavin N, Mehta S, Liberson M, Pouget JM. Pseudocoarctation of the aorta: an unusual variant with coarctation. Am J Cardiol. 1969; 24: 584–590.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Jacoby WT, Williams DM, Cho KJ, Marx MV, Deeb GM. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the thoracic aorta. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996; 166: 1387–1397.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Ho VB, Corse WR, Hood MN, Rowedder AM. MRA of the thoracic vessels. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2003; 24: 192–216.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Ho VB, Prince MR. Thoracic MR aortography: imaging techniques and strategies. Radiographics. 1998; 18: 287–309.[Abstract]

21. Greil GF, Powell AJ, Gildein HP, Geva T. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of pulmonary and systemic venous anomalies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39: 335–341.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Higgins CB. Essentials of Cardiac Radiology and Imaging. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott; 1992: 179–214.

23. Freed K, Low VHS. The aberrant subclavian artery. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997; 168: 481–484.[Free Full Text]

24. Tissières P, Didier D, Dahoun S, Jaeggi ET. Turner syndrome with complex mosaic monosomy and structural aorta anomalies. J Pediatr. 2003; 142: 341. Comment.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Clark EB. Neck web and congenital heart defects: a pathogenic association in 45 X-O Turner syndrome? Teratology. 1984; 29: 355–361.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Lacro R, Jones KL, Benirscheke K. Coarctation of the aorta in Turner syndrome: a pathologic study of fetuses with nuchal cystic hygromas, hydrops fetalis, and female genitalia. Pediatrics. 1988; 81: 445–451.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Shinebourne EA, Elseed AM. Relationship between fetal flow patterns, coarctation of the aorta, and pulmonary blood flow. Br Heart J. 1974; 36: 492–498.[Free Full Text]

28. Gupta TC, Wiggers CJ. Basic hemodynamic changes produced by aortic coarctation of different degrees. Circulation. 1951; 3: 17–31.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. O’Rourke MF, Cartmill TB. Influence of aortic coarctation on pulsatile hemodynamics in the proximal aorta. Circulation. 1971; 44: 281–290.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Xu J, Shiota T, Omoto R, Zhou X, Kyo S, Ishii M, Rice MJ, Sahn DJ. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of regional aortic wall stiffness, distensibility, and compliance in patients with coarctation of the aorta. Am Heart J. 1997; 134: 93–98.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Degroff CG, Orlando W, Shandas R. Insights into the effect of aortic compliance on Doppler diastolic flow patterns seen in coarctation of the aorta: a numeric study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003; 16: 162–169.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Lin AE, Lippe B, Rosenfeld RG. Further delineation of aortic dilation, dissection, and rupture in patients with Turner syndrome. Pediatrics. 1998; 102: e12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Sybert VP. Cardiovascular malformations and complications in Turner syndrome. Pediatrics. 1998; 101: e11–e18.

34. Prandstraller D, Mazzanti L, Picchio FM, Magnani C, Bergamaschi R, Perri A, Tsingos E, Cacciari E. Turner’s syndrome: cardiologic profile according to the different chromosomal patterns and long-term clinical follow-up of 136 nonpreselected patients. Pediatr Cardiol. 1999; 20: 108–112.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

35. Shiroma K, Ebine K, Tamura S, Yokomuro M, Suzuki H, Takanashi Y. A case of Turner’s syndrome associated with partial anomalous pulmonary venous return complicated by dissecting aortic aneurysm and aortic regurgitation. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1997; 38: 257–259.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

36. Snellen HA, van Ingen HC, Hoefsmit ECM. Patterns of anomalous pulmonary venous drainage. Circulation. 1968; 38: 45–63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Price WH, Willey RF. Partial anomalous pulmonary venous drainage in two patients with Turner’s syndrome. J Med Genet. 1980; 17: 133–134.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Saenger P, Wikland KA, Conway GS, Davenport M, Gravholt CH, Hintz R, Hovatta O, Hultcrantz M, Landin-Wilhelmsen K, Lin A, Lippe B, Pasquino AM, Ranke MB, Rosenfeld R, Silberbach M; Fifth International Symposium on Turner Syndrome. Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of Turner syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001; 86: 3061–3069.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A. O. Caglayan and M. Dundar
Inherited diseases and syndromes leading to aortic aneurysms and dissections
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2009; 35(6): 931 - 940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
B. E. Hjerrild, K. H. Mortensen, and C. H. Gravholt
Turner syndrome and clinical treatment
Br. Med. Bull., June 1, 2008; 86(1): 77 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
V. Sachdev, L. A. Matura, S. Sidenko, V. B. Ho, A. E. Arai, D. R. Rosing, and C. A. Bondy
Aortic Valve Disease in Turner Syndrome
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 13, 2008; 51(19): 1904 - 1909.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
L. A. Matura, V. B. Ho, D. R. Rosing, and C. A. Bondy
Aortic Dilatation and Dissection in Turner Syndrome
Circulation, October 9, 2007; 116(15): 1663 - 1670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
C. H. Gravholt, B. E. Hjerrild, L. Mosekilde, T. K. Hansen, L. M. Rasmussen, J. Frystyk, A. Flyvbjerg, and J. S. Christiansen
Body composition is distinctly altered in Turner syndrome: relations to glucose metabolism, circulating adipokines, and endothelial adhesion molecules.
Eur. J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2006; 155(4): 583 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
K. Stochholm, S. Juul, K. Juel, R. W. Naeraa, and C. Hojbjerg Gravholt
Prevalence, Incidence, Diagnostic Delay, and Mortality in Turner Syndrome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 3897 - 3902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
C. A. Bondy, I. Ceniceros, P. L. Van, V. K. Bakalov, and D. R. Rosing
Prolonged Rate-Corrected QT Interval and Other Electrocardiogram Abnormalities in Girls With Turner Syndrome
Pediatrics, October 1, 2006; 118(4): e1220 - e1225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. E. Ostberg, A. E. Donald, J. P. J. Halcox, C. Storry, C. McCarthy, and G. S. Conway
Vasculopathy in Turner Syndrome: Arterial Dilatation and Intimal Thickening without Endothelial Dysfunction
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2005; 90(9): 5161 - 5166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch Women's HealthHome page
Enhanced MRA Defines Vascular Anomalies in Turner Syndrome
Journal Watch Women's Health, November 23, 2004; 2004(1123): 4 - 4.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
110/12/1694    most recent
01.CIR.0000142290.35842.B0v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ho, V. B.
Right arrow Articles by Bondy, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ho, V. B.
Right arrow Articles by Bondy, C. A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Genetics Home Reference
Medline Plus Health Information
*MRI Scans
*Turner Syndrome
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical genetics
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Pediatric and congenital heart disease, including cardiovascular surgery
Right arrow Cardiac development