Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2004;110:II-164-II-168
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138400.44799.65
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ishii, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Damiano, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ishii, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Damiano, R. J., Jr
Related Collections
Right arrow CV surgery: other

(Circulation. 2004;110:II-164 – II-168.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Arrythmia Surgery

Atrial Tachyarrhythmias After the Maze Procedure

Incidence and Prognosis

Yosuke Ishii, MD; Marye J. Gleva, MD; M. Carolyn Gamache, MD; Richard B. Schuessler, PhD; John P. Boineau, MD; Marci S. Bailey, RN; Ralph J. Damiano, Jr, MD

From Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery (Y.I., R.B.S., J.P.B., M.S.B., R.J.D.), St. Louis, Mo; Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Cardiology (M.J.G.), St. Louis, Mo; Metro Heart Group (C.G.), St. Louis, Mo.

Correspondence to Ralph J. Damiano, Jr, MD, Suite 3108, Queeny Tower, Barnes–Jewish Hospital Plaza, St. Louis, MO 63110. E-mail damianor{at}wustl.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— The Maze procedure restores normal sinus rhythm in the majority of patients. However, atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATA) are a common early complication after the operation. The purpose of this study was to define the incidence and natural history of ATA after the Maze procedure.

Methods— Complete medical records from 200 patients who underwent the Maze procedures (I, II, and III) from 1987 to 2002 were examined for all episodes of early postoperative ATA that occurred during the first 30 days after the procedure. Two electrophysiologists independently reviewed all postoperative 12-lead electrocardiograms.

Results— ATA occurred in 86 patients (43%) after the Maze procedure. Of the patients with ATA, 59% had atrial fibrillation (AF), 14% had atrial flutter (AFL), and 27% had both AF and AFL. Of the patients with AF or AFL, 20% and 5%, respectively, also had episodes of atrial tachycardia and supraventricular tachyarrhythmia. The peak incidence of early postoperative ATA was on postoperative day 8. The average duration of ATA was 5.7±5.0 days. Late recurrence of AF (>1 year postoperatively) occurred in 7.0% of patients who had early postoperative ATA and 8.8% of patients without early postoperative ATA (P=0.8).

Conclusions— ATA occurred in 43% of patients after the Maze procedure. The tachyarrhythmias occurred primarily within 8 days after surgery and resolved within 3 weeks in almost all patients. There was no relationship between the incidence of early postoperative ATA and the late recurrence of AF.


Key Words: arrhythmia • fibrillation • surgery • tachyarrhythmias


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Postoperative atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATA) are relatively common after cardiac surgery.1–3 These tachyarrhythmias are recognized as a major cause of perioperative morbidity. They can cause hypotension, congestive heart failure, and significant symptoms that include palpitations or shortness of breath. Moreover, the management of these arrhythmias has been shown to significantly extend the length of hospitalization.4,5

The Maze procedure has evolved into the gold standard of treatment for medically refractory atrial fibrillation (AF) during the past decade. The atrial incisions of the procedure are designed to block potential macroreentrant pathways and narrow the atrial tissue to block propagation of microreentrant wavelets. Moreover, focal activation from pulmonary veins is blocked by the isolation of left atrial posterior wall, including all of the pulmonary veins.6 Studies show that the procedure restores normal sinus rhythm in >90% of patients at late follow-up.6–9 However, 40% of patients undergoing the Maze procedure have early postoperative ATA, despite the fact that the Maze procedure effectively prevents late AF.10

The incidence of ATA has been well-described after cardiac procedures. Previous studies have shown that the peak incidence of early postoperative AF is on the second postoperative day (POD) after coronary artery bypass surgery, with more than one-third of such episodes occurring on that day.2,5 Of patients who experience early postoperative AF, 87% will do so by the end of POD 5. It has been shown that patients having valvular surgery have a higher incidence of early postoperative AF compared with coronary artery bypass patients.3,11,12

However, ATA after the Maze procedure have not been examined in detail. The purpose of this study was to define the incidence and natural history of early postoperative ATA after the Maze procedure, and to examine whether the occurrence of these arrhythmias predisposed to late recurrence of AF.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patient Population
Between September 25, 1987 and July 1, 2002, a total of 252 adult patients underwent the Maze procedure at Barnes–Jewish Hospital at Washington University Medical Center. Two hundred patients of these were extracted at random for this study, all of whom had their postoperative electrocardiograms (ECG) available for review. A retrospective review of each patient’s medical record was undertaken and information regarding past medical history, operative procedure, postoperative ECG, and postoperative course was extracted. This study was approved by the Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes–Jewish Hospital Institutional Review Board. The characteristics of the overall patient population are summarized in Table 1. Eighty-seven patients had preoperative continuous AF and 113 patients had paroxysmal AF. The mean duration of both types of AF was 9±8 years. One hundred twenty-three patients had lone AF. Thirty-four patients had associated valvular disease and 36 patients had ischemic heart disease. Thirty patients (15%) underwent the Maze I procedure, 12 patients (6%) underwent the Maze II procedure, and 158 patients (79%) underwent the Maze III procedure. The majority of patients (n=151) had no heart failure before surgery. Forty-eight patients (24%) had heart failure preoperatively (New York Heart Association class 2, n=31; class 3, n=13; and class 4, n=5, respectively).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Summary of Preoperative Characteristics

Management of Preoperative and Postoperative Medications
Preoperative medications, including digoxin and ß-blockers, were routinely withdrawn on the day of surgery. Although the use of prophylactic antiarrhythmia medications was variable, all patients with early postoperative ATA were treated with either a class I or a class III antiarrhythmic drug. Oral anticoagulation was maintained for the first 2 to 3 months. Nineteen patients (9.5%) had a pacemaker that had been implanted before their Maze procedure. One hundred fifty-five patients (78%) received temporary atrial pacing for at least 1 day after the Maze procedure. Fifty-two patients (26%) required a pacemaker implantation after the Maze procedure (Maze I, 17 of 30 patients; Maze II, 4 of 12 patients; Maze III, 31 of 158 patients).

Study Protocol
All early postoperative 12-lead ECGs (<30 days after surgery) were reviewed according to standard electrocardiographic criteria by 2 electrophysiologists (M.J.G., M.C.G.) who were blinded with respect to POD and patient characteristics. All patients were monitored continuously for arrhythmias until the time of discharge from the hospital. While patients were in the intensive care unit, monitoring was performed using individual bedside electronic monitors. When patients were in the postoperative nursing ward, monitoring was performed by telemetry to a central nursing station monitoring system. For the purpose of this study, atrial tachyarrhythmias were defined to be any episodes of one or more of the following tachyarrhythmias: AF, atrial flutter (AFL), atrial tachycardia, or supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (SVT).

Definitions
AF was defined as a rapid irregular rhythm with disorganized atrial activity in which distinct P waves were absent. AFL included both typical and atypical forms. Typical flutter was a regular atrial arrhythmia with negative flutter waves in the inferior leads and positive flutter waves in lead V1 at an atrial cycle length of 200 to 280 ms. Atypical flutter encompassed regular atrial activity at similar cycle lengths with monophologies different from typical flutter. Atrial tachycardia was defined as a heart rate >100 bpm with a P-wave morphology and axis different from the sinus P wave. SVT was defined as the sudden onset of a rapid atrial rate (150 to 200 bpm) with a regular narrow QRS complex and no obvious P waves.

Follow-Up
The patients’ clinical profiles and postoperative outcomes were recorded in a computerized database. Long-term follow-up was conducted by a mailed questionnaire or telephone interview with patients and also contact was made with either their cardiologist or their primary care physician. To confirm arrhythmia recurrence, copies of ECG and Holter monitoring were required. The average follow-up period was 103±37 months (15 to 189 months).

Statistical Analysis
All continuous values were expressed as mean±1 SD. The continuous variables were compared between the procedures by an analysis of variance. Tabular data were compared using the {chi}2 or Fisher exact test. Univariate and multivariable stepwise logistic regression was used to identify the significant predictors of postoperative AF. The following variables were entered into the model: patient age, type of preoperative AF, duration of preoperative AF, the Maze procedure version (I to III), cross-clamp time, and cardiopulmonary bypass time. A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant (SYSTAT, v10.2, SYSTAT Software).


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Eighty-six patients (43%) had one or more episodes of ATA in the early postoperative phase (<30 days) after the Maze procedure (Figure 1). The other 114 patients did not have any early postoperative ATA. Of the patients who had ATA, 51 patients (59%) had AF, 12 patients (14%) had AFL, and 23 patients (27%) had both AF and AFL (AF+AFL). Atrial tachycardia also occurred in 17 patients with AF or AFL (9 AF patients, 2 AFL patients, and 6 AF+AFL patients). SVT occurred in 4 patients with AF or AFL (3 AF patients and 1 AF+AFL patient). Atrial tachycardia or SVT did not occur in any patients who also did not experience AF or AFL. The mean atrial cycle lengths of AFL and AT were 207±13 ms (200 to 240 ms) and 401±79 ms (270 to 560 ms), respectively. The mean atrial cycle length of SVT was 300±23 ms (280 to 320 ms).



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Incidence of ATA after the Maze procedure.

The peak incidence of early postoperative ATA was on POD 8, with 18% of such episodes occurring on that day (Figure 2). The incidence of early postoperative ATA was clustered within first 14 days after the Maze procedure. By the end of POD 14, 87% of patients with early postoperative ATA had experienced their tachyarrhythmias. The incidence of early postoperative ATA decreased markedly after POD 14. Only one patient still had ATA after the third postoperative week.



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Frequency distribution of incidence of ATA after the Maze procedure.

In 93% of the patients with the early postoperative ATA, the initial onset of the ATA occurred within the first 9 postoperative days (Figure 3). The average duration of early postoperative ATA was 5.7±5.0 days. In 74% of the patients with ATA, the duration was >24 hours. Despite the use of antiarrhythmic drugs, early postoperative ATA continued in 42 patients >5 days after the Maze procedure. However, only 5 patients continued to experience ATA >2 weeks postoperatively.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Frequency of distribution of day of onset of ATA after the Maze procedure.

Early postoperative ATA occurred in 47% of patients with preoperative continuous AF and 40% of patients with preoperative paroxysmal AF (P=0.3). In 123 patients with a preoperative diagnosis of lone AF, 53 patients (43%) had postoperative ATA. On univariate analysis, the only preoperative factors associated with a higher incidence of postoperative ATA were mean age of the patient (P=0.003) and a longer duration of preoperative AF (P=0.08, Table 2). The intraoperative factor associated with a higher incidence of postoperative ATA was cardiopulmonary bypass time (P=0.04). Length of hospital stay in early postoperative ATA patients was significantly longer than that of patients without early postoperative ATA (P=0.00002), despite the same length of intensive care unit stay in each group (P=0.3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Univariate Analysis for Early Postoperative ATA

In 30 patients who underwent the Maze I procedure, 17 patients (57%) had early postoperative ATA. Early postoperative ATA occurred in 6 (50%) of 12 Maze II patients and in 63 patients (40%) of 158 Maze III patients, respectively. There was no significant difference of incidence of early postoperative ATA between Maze I, II, and III procedures (P=0.2).

In the 133 patients with the Maze procedure alone, 52 patients (39%) had early postoperative ATA. Thirty-two patients of the 59 patients with the Maze procedure and a concomitant procedure (coronary artery bypass grafting or valvular surgery) had early postoperative ATA. The incidence of early postoperative ATA was significantly lower in the patients with the Maze procedure alone (P=0.04; Table 2). There was a trend that the patients undergoing the Maze procedure with a concomitant procedure had a higher incidence of early postoperative ATA than the patients with the Maze procedure alone (P=0.06; Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Univariate and Multivariate Predictors Analysis of Early Postoperative ATA

Stepwise logistic regression identified age (P=0.007), cross-clamp time (P=0.037), and cardiopulmonary bypass time (P=0.026) as the only significant predictors of early postoperative ATA (Table 3).

Anti-arrhythmia medication at late-term follow-up was available in 184 (92%) of the 200 patients. Of 184 patients with follow-up, 11 patients (6%) were using a class I anti-arrhythmic drug and 6 patients (3%) were using a class III drug at last follow-up. The indications for the usage of these drugs were at the discretion of the patient’s cardiologists.

Electrophysiology studies and catheter ablation were performed in 12 patients in whom atrial tachyarrhythmias developed after the Maze procedure. Six patients had AFL at the time of electrophysiology study. All of these patients were found to have the flutter circuit confined to the left atrium. Two patients were ablated by radiofrequency or direct current (DC) energy applied to the coronary sinus, because coronary sinus conduction had recovered after the application of operative cryothermia lesions to a degree that allowed conduction from the left to right atrium. One patient was treated with anti-arrhythmic medications. Three other patients underwent radiofrequency ablation of the AV node with pacemaker implantation. Two patients had AF diagnosed at electrophysiology study after the Maze procedure. These patients were also treated by AV node ablation and pacemaker implantation. Four patients had atrial tachycardia diagnosed in the electrophysiology laboratory. In each case, the site of origin was localized to the right atrium. All were treated with radiofrequency ablation. One patient required 2 procedures to terminate the atrial tachycardia.

Of 11 patients who required the catheter ablation, 5 patients had had early postoperative ATA after the Maze procedure (AF, 4 patients; AF+AFL, 1 patient; and AFL, 1 patient). The other 5 patients had never had any ATA in early postoperative phase.

Sixteen patients (8.0%) had recurrence of AF in the late postoperative period (>1 year) after the Maze procedure. Of the patients with early postoperative ATA, 7.0% experienced late recurrence of AF. Of the patients without early postoperative ATA, 8.8% experienced late recurrence of AF. There was no significant difference in the late recurrence of AF between these 2 groups (P=0.8) (Table 2).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
There were several important findings in this study. First, there was no relationship between the incidence of early postoperative ATA and the late recurrence of AF after the Maze procedure. Early postoperative ATA was most often transient and usually terminated within the first several weeks after the Maze procedure. The most common arrhythmias were AF and AFL. The peak incidence of early postoperative ATA was on POD 8 and 87% of patients with ATA had their episodes within the first 2 weeks after surgery.

The Maze procedure cures AF and restores sinus rhythm in the majority of patients.6–9 Even though the Maze procedure is designed to cure AF, early postoperative ATA occurred in >40% of patients after the Maze procedure in the present study. Other studies have shown that AF emerges after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation by radiofrequency ablation.13,14 After complete PV isolation by catheter ablation, 35% of those patients were found to have AF on POD 4. In one-third of those patients, the early recurrence of AF converts to sinus rhythm 2 weeks after the catheter ablation.

The mechanism of early postoperative ATA may be different from that of preoperative AF. The increased dispersion of atrial refractoriness is one proposed mechanism that facilitates the initiation of reentry in the atria after surgery.15,16 Some studies also have shown that an increased inflammatory response correlates with the occurrence of early postoperative ATA.17,18 Chung et al showed that patients with AF had higher C-reactive protein levels than patients without AF.18 The Maze procedure requires extensive incisions and suture lines on both atria. Inflammation in the atrial myocardium caused by the atrial incisions may be associated with early postoperative ATA. Unfortunately, we were not able to investigate atrial inflammation after the Maze procedure in this retrospective study. The Ca2+ channel may also play a role in early postoperative AF.19 A higher Ca2+ current density in the atrial myocytes has been described in patients with early postoperative AF.20 Furthermore, the present study showed the significance of cross-clamp time and cardiopulmonary bypass time in predisposing to early postoperative ATA. Atrial ischemia during cardiac surgery may be one of the mechanisms of early postoperative ATA. Sinno et al have demonstrated that atrial ischemia causes slow conduction in the ischemic zone, resulting in a substrate for AF maintenance.21

Incomplete cryoablation near the valvular annulus or coronary sinus during the Maze procedure has been postulated to incisional macroreentry around the mitral or tricuspid valves. Shah et al described slow conduction through the isthmus created by incomplete ablation causing sustained stable AFL.22 Avoidance of incomplete ablation could prevent incisional macroreentry after the Maze procedure. Nonpulmonary vein focal tachycardia may also occur after the Maze procedure. In this study, 4 patients had right atrial tachycardia that was treated with radiofrequency catheter ablation after surgery.

In coronary artery bypass surgery patients, 2 large observational studies have investigated the timing of the onset of early postoperative ATA.2,5 Those studies showed that the peak incidence of ATA is on POD 2 after coronary artery bypass surgery. In contrast, the incidence of onset of early postoperative ATA was much later in patients after the Maze procedure. Therefore, the incidence of postoperative ATA significantly lengthened hospital stay after the Maze procedure. Similar to coronary artery bypass surgery patients, however, postoperative early ATA after the Maze procedure appeared to be self-limiting and without any long term detrimental influences on patient prognosis.

Patient age is an important risk factor for early postoperative AF after other cardiac procedures.3,5,11 Aranki et al showed that the incidence of early postoperative AF was 52% for patients older than 80 years compared with 18% for patients younger than 60 years in coronary artery bypass grafting patients.5 In the present study, the mean age of patients with early postoperative ATA was significantly higher than that of patients without early postoperative ATA after the Maze procedure. Age-related atrial structural changes, such as dilatation, atrophy, or fibrosis, might affect the occurrence of early postoperative ATA.

The data in this study describe the national history of ATA after the Maze procedure in a large cohort of patients. The most significant risk factors for the development of postoperative ATA were patient age, cross-clamp time, and cardiopulmonary bypass time. The early postoperative ATA usually resolved within 3 weeks after the Maze procedure, and most importantly had no significant relationship to the late recurrence of AF after the Maze procedure.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Supported by research grant R01-HL32257 from the National Institutes of Health.


*    Footnotes
 
Presented at the 24th North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology meeting (May 2003).


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Michelson EL, Monganroth J, MacVaugh H. Postoperative arrhythmias after coronary artery and cardiac valvular surgery detected by long-term electrocardiographic monitoring. Am Heart J. 1982; 104: 442–448.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Fuller JA, Adams GG, Buxton B. Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Is it a disorder of the elderly? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989; 97: 821–825.[Abstract]

3. Creswell LL, Schuessler RB, Rosenbloom M, et al. Hazards of postoperative atrial arrhythmias. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993; 56: 539–549.[Abstract]

4. Kalman JM, Munawar M, Howes LG, et al. Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with sympathetic activation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995; 60: 1709–1715.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Aranki SF, Shaw DP, Adams DH, et al. Predictors of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery surgery: Current trends and impact on hospital resources. Circulation. 1996; 94: 390–397.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Cox JL, Schuessler RB, D’Agostino HJ et al. The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. III. Development of a definitive surgical procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991; 101: 569–583.[Abstract]

7. Prasad SM, Maniar HS, Camillo CJ, et al. The cox-maze III procedure for atrial fibrillation: Long-term efficacy in patients undergoing lone versus concomitant procedures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003; 126: 1822–1827.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Cox JL, Boineau JP, Schuessler RB, et al. Modification of the maze procedure for atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation. I. Rationale and surgical results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995; 110: 473–484.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Cox JL, Schuessler RB, Lappas DG, et al. An 8 1/2-year clinical experience with surgery for atrial fibrillation. Ann Surg. 1996; 224: 267–273.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Ad N, Pirovic EA, Kim YD, et al. Observations on the perioperative management of patients undergoing the Maze procedure. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000; 12: 63–67.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Mathew JP, Parks R, Savino JS, et al. Atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Predictors, outcomes, and resource utilization. JAMA. 1996; 276: 300–306.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Almassi GH, Schowalter T, Nicolosi AC, et al. Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. A major morbid event? Ann Surg. 1997; 226: 501–513.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Oral H, Knight BP, Ozaydn M, et al. Clinical significance of early recurrences of atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 40: 100–104.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Pasic M, Bergs P, Muller P, et al. Intraoperative radiofrequency maze ablation for atrial fibrillation: the Berlin modification. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001; 72: 1484–1491.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Cox JL. A perspective of postoperative atrial fibrillation in cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993; 56: 405–409.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Konings KT, Kirchhof CJ, Smeets JR, et al. High-density mapping of electrically induced atrial fibrillation in humans. Circulation. 1994; 89: 1665–1680.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Bruins P, te Velthuis H, Yazdanbakhsh AP, et al. Activation of the complement system during and after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery: Postsurgery activation involves C-reactive protein and is associated with postoperative arrhythmia. Circulation. 1997; 96: 3542–3548.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Chung MK, Martin DO, Sprecher D, et al. C-reactive protein elevation in patients with atrial arrhythmias: inflammatory mechanisms and persistence of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2001; 104: 2886–2891.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Nattel S. Ionic determinants of atrial fibrillation and Ca2+ channel abnormalities : cause, consequence, or innocent bystander? Circ Res. 1999; 85: 473–476.[Free Full Text]

20. Van Wagoner DR, Pond AL, Lamorgese M, et al. Atrial L-type Ca2+ currents and human atrial fibrillation. Circ Res. 1999; 85: 428–436.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Sinno H, Derakhchan K, Libersan D, et al. Atrial ischemia promotes atrial fibrillation in dogs. Circulation. 2003; 107: 1930–1936.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Shah D, Haissaguerre M, Jais P, et al. High-density mapping of activation through an incomplete isthmus ablation line. Circulation. 1999; 99: 211–215.[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ishii, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Damiano, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ishii, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Damiano, R. J., Jr
Related Collections
Right arrow CV surgery: other