| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2004;110:22-26.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
From the Internal Medicine Unit, IRCCS Maugeri Foundation Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Therapeutics (C.G., S.G., E.D.A., G.B., P.F.), Cardiology Unit (C.F.), Internal Medicine, Vascular and Metabolic Diseases, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo (D.G.), and the Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Therapeutics (S.B.S.), University of Pavia; and Diabetes Centers of Pavia and Mede (A.G.), Azienda Ospedaliera Province of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Correspondence to Carmine Gazzaruso, MD, IRCCS Maugeri Foundation Hospital, Internal Medicine Unit, Via Ferrata 8, 27100 Pavia, Italy. E-mail c.gazzaruso{at}tele2.it
Received September 30, 2003; de novo received December 21, 2003; revision received March 10, 2004; accepted March 17, 2004.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results We evaluated the prevalence of ED in 133 uncomplicated diabetic men with angiographically verified silent CAD and in 127 diabetic men without myocardial ischemia at exercise ECG, 48-hour ambulatory ECG, and stress echocardiography. The groups were comparable for age and diabetes duration. Patients were screened for ED using the validated International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire. The prevalence of ED was significantly higher in patients with than in those without silent CAD (33.8% versus 4.7%; P=0.000). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that ED, apolipoprotein(a) polymorphism, smoking, microalbuminuria, HDL, and LDL were significantly associated with silent CAD; among these risk factors, ED appeared to be the most efficient predictor of silent CAD (OR, 14.8; 95% CI, 3.8 to 56.9).
Conclusions Our study first shows a strong and independent association between ED and silent CAD in apparently uncomplicated type 2 diabetic patients. If our findings are confirmed, ED may become a potential marker to identify diabetic patients to screen for silent CAD. Moreover, the high prevalence of ED among diabetics with silent CAD suggests the need to perform an exercise ECG before starting a treatment for ED, especially in patients with additional cardiovascular risk factors.
Key Words: coronary disease diabetes mellitus men ischemia, silent myocardial erectile dysfunction
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Out of the total of CAD patients (n=178) recruited into two previous studies,11,12 32 were excluded because they were females. As for NO CAD patients, 16 subjects (13 males and 3 females) were used in both previous studies.11,12 Therefore, out of the total of NO CAD patients (n=162) recruited into two previous studies,11,12 29 were excluded because they were females.
From these studies,11,12 we evaluated the prevalence of ED among 133 uncomplicated type 2 diabetic men with angiographically documented asymptomatic CAD (CAD group) and in a group of 127 type 2 diabetic men without myocardial ischemia at exercise ECG, 48-hour ambulatory ECG, and stress echocardiogram (NO CAD group).
Because screening for ED is a routine analysis in our outpatient department, data on ED were obtained from our database. Screening for ED has been performed by the validated International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) questionnaire.13 In the present study, we enrolled only male patients screened for ED in the year before the diagnosis of silent CAD or the exclusion of the silent myocardial ischemia.
Among the 133 diabetic patients with angiographically verified silent CAD, 75 derived from the population with normal ECG at rest11 and 58 derived from the population with ECG abnormalities.12 Among the 127 NO CAD subjects, 67 derived from the first study,11 49 from the latter one,12 and 11 were used in both previous studies.11,12 Indeed, 13 CAD patients and 6 NO CAD subjects of the previous studies11,12 were not enrolled in the present investigation for the following reasons: (1) Data on ED are not available (3 CAD patients and 2 NO CAD subjects); (2) data on ED were collected after the diagnosis of silent CAD or the exclusion of the silent myocardial ischemia (6 CAD patients and 1 NO CAD subject); or (3) data on ED were collected more than 12 months before the diagnosis of silent CAD or the exclusion of the silent myocardial ischemia (4 CAD patients and 3 NO CAD subjects).
Statistical Analysis
By using an analysis of covariance, all data on lipid parameters were adjusted for BMI, smoking, drug intake, presence of hypertension, and microalbuminuria. To assess differences in normal variables the Students t test was utilized. Differences in non-normal variables were assessed by the Mann-Whitney U test. The Pearson
2 test was exploited for frequency comparison. A multiple logistic regression analysis with the presence of asymptomatic CAD as the dependent variable was performed. Another multiple logistic regression analysis with ED as the dependent variable was performed to identify predictors of ED. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated and the results were given as ORs and 95% CIs. Data were presented as mean±SD, unless otherwise stated. A value of P<0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Among CAD patients, the prevalence of subjects with ED did not differ in the subgroup of subjects with normal resting ECG compared with the subgroup of patients with abnormalities at resting ECG (36.0% versus 31.0%; NS).
No significant differences in the percentages of subjects treated with thiazide diuretics (12.0% versus 11.0%), ß-blockers (6.0% versus 8.7%), or statins (33.8% versus 38.5%) were found between patients with and without silent CAD.
There was no significant difference in the prevalence of subjects with mild to moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (11.3% versus 9.4%) between patients with and without silent CAD.
A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed with presence/absence of asymptomatic CAD as the dependent variable and the following as predictive variables: age (
55 versus <55 years14), diabetes duration (>10 versus
10 years), hypertension (
130/80 mm Hg or antihypertensive treatment versus <130/80 mm Hg15), family history of CAD (documented myocardial ischemia or infarction in a first-degree relative versus no documented myocardial ischemia or infarction in a first-degree relative14), smoking (smokers or ex-smokers versus never-smokers), microalbuminuria (albumin excretion rate between 30 and 299 mg/d versus albumin excretion rate <30 mg/d11,12,15), HbA1c (
7.0% versus <7.0%15), BMI (
25 versus <25), lipoprotein(a) (
30 versus <30 mg/dL14), cholesterol (
200 versus <200 mg/dL16), triglycerides (
150 versus <150 mg/dL16), LDL (
100 versus <100 mg/dL16), HDL (<40 versus
40 mg/dL16), ED (IIEF-5 scores
21 versus >2113), apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] polymorphism (at least one isoform with molecular weight
640 kDa versus only isoforms with molecular weight >640 kDa11,12,14), and autonomic dysfunction (abnormal findings in at least one of the 5 standard repeatable tests versus normal findings in all 5 standard repeatable tests12). Analysis showed that ED (OR, 14.8; 95% CI, 3.9 to 56.9; P=0.000), apo(a) polymorphism (OR, 8.1; 95% CI, 3.4 to 19.0; P=0.000), smoking (OR, 4.9; 95% CI, 2.4 to 9.9; P=0.000), microalbuminuria (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.6 to 8.8; P=0.003), HDL (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.4 to 6.1; P=0.003), and LDL (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.0 to 5.4; P=0.040) were significant predictors of asymptomatic CAD in diabetic patients. ED appeared to be the most efficient predictor of silent CAD.
Sensitivity, specificity, and positive or negative predictive values have been calculated for ED (sensitivity, 33.8%; specificity, 95.3%; positive predictive value, 88.2%; negative predictive value, 42.1%),
Table 2 shows clinical and biological features of diabetic patients stratified according to the presence/absence of ED. Fifty-one patients had ED; 209 did not have ED. As shown, microalbuminuria, autonomic dysfunction, silent CAD, and low apo(a) phenotypes were significantly higher in subjects with than in those without ED. Diabetes duration was higher in subjects with ED, but it did not attain statistical significance.
|
No significant differences in the percentages of subjects treated with thiazide diuretics (8.9% versus 12.0%), ß-blockers (5.9% versus 7.6%), or statins (31.4% versus 37.3%) were found between patients with and without ED.
There was no significant difference in the prevalence of subjects with mild to moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (11.8% versus 10.0%) between patients with and without ED.
A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed with presence/absence of ED as the dependent variable and the following as predictive variables: age, diabetes duration, hypertension, family history of CAD, smoking, microalbuminuria, HbA1c, BMI, lipoprotein(a), cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL, HDL, silent CAD, apo(a) polymorphism, and autonomic dysfunction. The logistic regression analysis showed that autonomic dysfunction (OR, 51.1; 95% CI, 12.7 to 205.2; P=0.000), silent CAD (OR, 14.0; 95% CI, 3.6 to 55.0; P=0.000), and microalbuminuria (OR, 12.3; 95% CI, 4.4 to 34.5; P=0.000) were independent predictors of ED in type 2 diabetic patients without clinical signs of CAD. Apo(a) polymorphism did not enter the model.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We found that about one third of patients with silent CAD showed ED, whereas among subjects without silent myocardial ischemia, the prevalence of ED was about 5%. In other words, the prevalence of ED seems to be quite 8-fold higher in patients with than in those without silent myocardial ischemia. In addition, it is interesting to observe that in uncomplicated diabetic patients at relatively low risk of CAD, when there is not silent myocardial ischemia, the prevalence of ED may be even similar to that of the general population.4,17
If confirmed, our findings may have some clinical implications in the management of type 2 diabetic patients. First of all, our data suggest that in uncomplicated type 2 diabetic patients at relatively low risk for CAD, ED should be regarded as a potential predictor of silent CAD. At present, American Diabetes Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines recommend noninvasive screening for silent CAD in uncomplicated diabetic patients only when 2 or more common cardiovascular risk factors are present.18 If our findings are confirmed by other studies, ED should be used together with other cardiovascular risk factors to discriminate patients needing further investigation for silent CAD. Indeed, in our survey, IIEF-5 questionnaire for screening ED showed good specificity, even if sensitivity was quite low. We also found a high positive predictive value, but it may be overestimated. Indeed, our patients were not population based, but rather selected, so that silent CAD prevalence was about 50%. In a more realistic situation with a silent CAD prevalence of about 10% to 30%,8 the positive predictive value may be lower than that found in the present study. Nevertheless, the predictive power of the IIEF-5 questionnaire could be increased when used together with other recognized cardiovascular risk factors. Therefore, the IIEF-5 questionnaire should be regarded not only as a simple and reliable tool to screen ED13 but also a potential tool to assess the global cardiovascular risk profile of diabetic subjects. This appears to be an interesting implication of our study. Indeed, early detection of silent CAD in diabetic patients allows the implementation of specific preventive strategies to reduce mortality and morbidity for coronary events.18 ED may contribute effectively to the early identification of subjects with silent CAD.
Another implication may pertain to the treatment of ED in uncomplicated diabetic patients. Because specific drug therapies for ED became available, important concerns are arising about their use in patients with ischemic heart disease.10,1921 The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend that an exercise test should be performed in patients with CAD to identify those at increased risk of myocardial ischemia during sexual intercourse.10 We found a significant association of ED with silent CAD; this may implicate that uncomplicated type 2 diabetic patients with ED should undergo investigations to exclude silent myocardial ischemia before starting specific drug therapy for ED, especially when other cardiovascular risk factors are present.
It is intriguing to speculate about the possible mechanisms linking ED to silent CAD in diabetic patients. In our study, ED appears to be strongly linked to microalbuminuria, but it is weakly associated with other predictors of coronary atherosclerosis, such as low apo(a) phenotypes.11,12,14 The strong association of microalbuminuria both with ED and silent CAD suggests that the link between ED and silent CAD may be represented by the endothelial dysfunction. Indeed microalbuminuria is now considered a marker of endothelial dysfunction.22 In addition, several studies showed that endothelial dysfunction may play a role both in ED and in CAD.2224 Another possible mechanism that may explain the relationship between ED and asymptomatic CAD is that both conditions may share a common pattern of cardiovascular risk factors, such as dyslipidemia, hypertension, smoking, and microalbuminuria.1,4,6,11,12,17,18,20,25
However, the link between ED and silent CAD may be hypothetically explained by the fact that ED, as a manifestation of autonomic neuropathy, might correlate with the lack of symptoms in diabetic patients with CAD. Indeed, in diabetic patients autonomic neuropathy has been found associated not only with ED2,26 but also with asymptomatic CAD.27 Specific investigations on the possible relationship between ED and symptomatic CAD in diabetic patients may clarify this issue. Several studies found an association between ED and overt CAD both in type 1 and type 2 diabetic subjects.2,26,28,29 An association of ED with known CAD has been described also in the general population.46,25 One study has even suggested a correlation between ED and CAD severity.6 However, in the these studies the clinical presentations of CAD often were not described; therefore, a clear association between ED and symptoms of CAD is not documented. Nonetheless, data from the literature clearly suggest that ED is independently correlated with overt CAD; thus, it is likely that there may be also a correlation between ED and asymptomatic CAD independent of autonomic neuropathy, as suggested by the present study. Nevertheless, the hypothesis that ED, as a manifestation of autonomic neuropathy, may be linked with the lack of symptoms in a proportion of diabetic patients with silent CAD cannot be excluded.
Still, central nervous system may offer another intriguing link between ED and silent CAD; indeed, the involvement of the central nervous system has been suggested both in the pathways of afferent pain signals from myocardium30 and in the central mechanisms of erectile dysfunction,31 especially in hypogonadism,32 which is a frequent condition in type 2 diabetic patients.33
Further studies are still needed to better investigate the possible common background underlying the relationship between ED and silent CAD in diabetic patients.
The present study might have some limitations. First, we have evaluated patients recruited into previous studies; those studies were not specifically designed to investigate the relationships between ED and silent CAD.11,12 Nonetheless, our choice to evaluate only patients with data on ED collected in the 1 year before the diagnosis of silent CAD or the exclusion of myocardial ischemia should eliminate any bias. Indeed, in this way, the assessment of sexual activity is close to the evaluation of the presence/absence of silent myocardial ischemia. In addition, in the present study, no differences in age, diabetes duration, and glycemic control were found between diabetic patients with and without silent myocardial ischemia. Therefore, age, diabetes duration, and glycemic control cannot influence data on ED and the relationships between ED and silent CAD. Another potential limitation may be the fact that the study population derives from two different investigations. However, it is important to remember that the prevalence of ED did not differ significantly in the subgroup of CAD patients with normal resting ECG (derived from the first study11) compared with that of CAD patients with abnormal ECG at rest (derived from the latter study12).
In conclusion, the present study suggests that ED appears to be strongly and independently associated with silent CAD in apparently uncomplicated type 2 diabetic patients. If our finding is confirmed by further studies, ED may be used as a potential predictor of silent CAD among diabetic patients. In addition, the high prevalence of ED among patients with silent CAD suggests the usefulness of an exercise ECG before starting a treatment for ED, especially in patients with additional cardiovascular risk factors.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Gazzaruso, S. B. Solerte, A. Pujia, A. Coppola, M. Vezzoli, F. Salvucci, C. Valenti, A. Giustina, and A. Garzaniti Erectile Dysfunction as a Predictor of Cardiovascular Events and Death in Diabetic Patients With Angiographically Proven Asymptomatic Coronary Artery Disease: A Potential Protective Role for Statins and 5-Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 27, 2008; 51(21): 2040 - 2044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C.-W. Ma, W.-Y. So, X. Yang, L. W.-L. Yu, A. P.-S. Kong, G. T.-C. Ko, C.-C. Chow, C. S. Cockram, J. C.-N. Chan, and P. C.-Y. Tong Erectile Dysfunction Predicts Coronary Heart Disease in Type 2 Diabetes J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 27, 2008; 51(21): 2045 - 2050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. De Feyter, S. F. Praet, N. M. van den Broek, H. Kuipers, C. D. Stehouwer, K. Nicolay, J. J. Prompers, and L. J.C. van Loon Exercise Training Improves Glycemic Control in Long-Standing Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetic Patients Diabetes Care, October 1, 2007; 30(10): 2511 - 2513. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Wylie Sexuality: its not just sex J R Soc Med, July 1, 2007; 100(7): 300 - 300. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Jackson Erectile dysfunction: a marker of silent coronary artery disease Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2006; 27(22): 2613 - 2614. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Montorsi, P. M. Ravagnani, S. Galli, F. Rotatori, F. Veglia, A. Briganti, A. Salonia, F. Deho, P. Rigatti, F. Montorsi, et al. Association between erectile dysfunction and coronary artery disease. Role of coronary clinical presentation and extent of coronary vessels involvement: the COBRA trial Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2006; 27(22): 2632 - 2639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Vlachopoulos, K. Aznaouridis, N. Ioakeimidis, K. Rokkas, C. Vasiliadou, N. Alexopoulos, E. Stefanadi, A. Askitis, and C. Stefanadis Unfavourable endothelial and inflammatory state in erectile dysfunction patients with or without coronary artery disease Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2006; 27(22): 2640 - 2648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Min, K. A. Williams, T. M. Okwuosa, G. W. Bell, M. S. Panutich, and R. P. Ward Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease by Erectile Dysfunction in Men Referred for Nuclear Stress Testing Arch Intern Med, January 23, 2006; 166(2): 201 - 206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. M. Thompson, C. M. Tangen, P. J. Goodman, J. L. Probstfield, C. M. Moinpour, and C. A. Coltman Erectile Dysfunction and Subsequent Cardiovascular Disease JAMA, December 21, 2005; 294(23): 2996 - 3002. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Chiurlia, R. D'Amico, C. Ratti, A. R. Granata, R. Romagnoli, and M. G. Modena Subclinical Coronary Artery Atherosclerosis in Patients With Erectile Dysfunction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 18, 2005; 46(8): 1503 - 1506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. K. Thethi, N. O. Asafu-Adjaye, and V. A. Fonseca Erectile Dysfunction Clin. Diabetes, July 1, 2005; 23(3): 105 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Kalter-Leibovici, J. Wainstein, A. Ziv, I. Harman-Bohem, H. Murad, I. Raz, and for the Israel Diabetes Research Group (IDRG) Inve Clinical, Socioeconomic, and Lifestyle Parameters Associated With Erectile Dysfunction Among Diabetic Men Diabetes Care, July 1, 2005; 28(7): 1739 - 1744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Stern Symptoms Other Than Chest Pain May Be Important in the Diagnosis of "Silent Ischemia," or "The Sounds of Silence" Circulation, June 21, 2005; 111(24): e435 - e437. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Jackson, H. Solomon, A. S. Wierzbicki, C. Gazzaruso, S. Giordanetti, E. De Amici, G. Bertone, P. Fratino, C. Falcone, D. Geroldi, et al. Letter Regarding Article by Gazzaruso et al, "Relationship Between Erectile Dysfunction and Silent Myocardial Ischemia in Apparently Uncomplicated Type 2 Diabetic Patients" * Response Circulation, January 18, 2005; 111(2): e18 - e19. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Minerva BMJ, October 16, 2004; 329(7471): E330 - E330. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Does Erectile Dysfunction Predict Silent Ischemia in Diabetes Patients? Journal Watch Cardiology, October 8, 2004; 2004(1008): 5 - 5. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Minerva BMJ, July 24, 2004; 329(7459): 240 - 240. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |