Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2004;109:3191-3195
Published online before print May 17, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000130590.24107.D3
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
109/25/3191    most recent
01.CIR.0000130590.24107.D3v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Campia, U.
Right arrow Articles by Panza, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Campia, U.
Right arrow Articles by Panza, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide
Right arrow Risk Factors

(Circulation. 2004;109:3191-3195.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Ethnic Differences in the Vasoconstrictor Activity of Endogenous Endothelin-1 in Hypertensive Patients

Umberto Campia, MD; Carmine Cardillo, MD; Julio A. Panza, MD

From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Md (U.C., C.C., J.A.P.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (C.C.); and Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (U.C., J.A.P.).

Correspondence to Dr Julio A. Panza, Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving St, NW, Suite 2A 74, Washington, DC 20010. E-mail julio.a.panza{at}medstar.net

Received January 21, 2004; accepted March 13, 2004.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— The pathogenesis of essential hypertension in blacks may differ from that in whites. In particular, black patients usually present with a salt-sensitive, low-renin form, which in animal models is associated with enhanced activity of endothelin-1 (ET-1). This study aimed to assess whether ethnic differences exist in the vascular activity of ET-1 in normotensive and hypertensive blacks and whites.

Methods and Results— Forearm blood flow (FBF) responses to intraarterial infusion of an ETA receptor blocker (BQ-123) were analyzed by plethysmography in 37 normotensive patients and 27 hypertensive patients according to race. BQ-123 did not affect FBF in normotensive subjects (P=0.30), whereas it produced significant vasodilation in hypertensive subjects (P<0.001). In normotensives, FBF response to BQ-123 was similar in white (n =22) and black (n =15) patients (P=0.85). In contrast, in hypertensive patients, the vasodilator effect of ETA receptor blockade was significantly higher in blacks (n =13) than in whites (n =14) (P=0.01). To rule out differences in smooth muscle reactivity, the effects of race on FBF responses to exogenous ET-1 were analyzed in the hypertensive subgroups. Endothelin-1 induced a significant vasoconstriction in both white (n =7) and black patients (n =5) (both P<0.001), without differences between them (P=0.46). In 8 black hypertensives, the response to selective ETA blockade was not modified by nonselective blockade of ET-1 receptors by co-infusion of BQ-123 and BQ-788 (P=0.66).

Conclusions— Hypertensive blacks have enhanced ETA-dependent vasoconstrictor tone, probably related to increased production of ET-1. Given the negative vascular effects of ET-1, this abnormality may contribute to the pathogenesis of hypertension and its complications in black patients.


Key Words: hypertension • endothelin • endothelium


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Epidemiological studies indicate that atherosclerosis and its complications, the leading cause of death among adults in the United States, carry considerably higher morbidity and mortality in blacks than in whites.1–3 These observations may be explained in part by an increased risk in blacks of developing traditional atherosclerotic risk factors, such as essential hypertension and diabetes mellitus.4–6 In particular, in black subjects, essential hypertension has higher prevalence, earlier onset, and is associated with more severe end-organ damage, including left ventricular hypertrophy, renal failure, and stroke.5 Despite intense investigation and the evidence that in blacks essential hypertension usually presents with salt-sensitive, low-renin features,7 the pathophysiological processes underlying this ethnic predisposition have not been fully elucidated.8

Recently, research has focused on possible differences in arterial wall function between blacks and whites, and on the impact of these differences on vascular homeostasis.9 Studies conducted in our and other laboratories have demonstrated that young, healthy black subjects have reduced nitric oxide (NO)-mediated vasodilation of forearm resistance vessels to mental stress10 and to endothelium-dependent and -independent pharmacological stimuli.11,12 These results indicate the presence of impaired vascular smooth muscle relaxation, which may lead, in the long term, to increased vascular tone and hypertension. A defect of blood vessels to relax in response to vasodilator stimuli might be related to increased activity of vasoconstrictor substances, as suggested by previous studies in our laboratory showing that enhanced endothelin-1 (ET-1) vasoconstrictor tone importantly contributes to the impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation in hypertensive patients.13 Besides its vasoactive actions, ET-1 may exert important mitogenic activity on vascular smooth cells14 and cardiac myocytes,15 thereby contributing to the structural changes of the vasculature and the heart associated with hypertension. In addition, ET-1 contributes to the preservation of Na+ and water balance, and may be involved in the development and maintenance of salt-sensitive hypertension, as indicated by studies in animal models of hypertension.16,17

A possible involvement of ET-1 in the development of hypertension and its complications in blacks has also been suggested by studies showing that plasma concentrations of ET-1 are increased in hypertensive black patients compared with white patients.18 Circulating levels of ET-1, however, are likely related to variable spillover of the peptide from the vasculature into the bloodstream, and may not accurately reflect its production or biological effects. Thus, whether an increased ET-1 activity preferentially contributes to the development of hypertension and its complications in blacks has not been elucidated. The present study was therefore designed to test the hypothesis that ethnic differences exist in the activity of ET-1 by the use of antagonists of ET-1 receptors.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Study Subjects
The study population included 27 hypertensive patients and 37 healthy controls who participated in prospective studies designed to investigate the in vivo vasoconstrictor activity of ET-1 in patients with essential hypertension and conducted in the Cardiology Branch of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (Table). Hypertensive patients were followed-up at the outpatient clinic and had well-documented histories of chronically elevated blood pressure (≥140/90 mm Hg) without any apparent underlying cause. Treated hypertensive patients were not taking any medication other than their antihypertensive drugs, which were discontinued at least 2 weeks before the study. None of the patients had a history of dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, coagulopathy, or any disease predisposing them to vasculitis or Raynaud’s phenomenon. Normal volunteers selected as a control group were matched with the patients for approximate race, gender, and age. Each subject was screened by clinical history, physical examination, ECG, chest x-ray, and routine chemical analyses. None had evidence of present or past hypertension, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular disease, or any other systemic condition, and none of them was taking medications at the time of the study. None of the subjects or patients participating in this study smoked. The study protocols were approved by the Investigational Review Board of the NHLBI and all participants gave written informed consent.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Clinical Characteristics of the Study Subjects

Protocols
Studies were performed in the morning in a quiet room with a temperature of approximately 22°C. Participants were asked to refrain from drinking alcohol or beverages containing caffeine for at least 24 hours before the studies. Each study consisted of infusion of drugs into the brachial artery and measurement of the response of the forearm vasculature by means of strain-gauge venous occlusion plethysmography, as previously described in detail.28 Forearm blood flow (FBF) measurements were recorded for approximately 7 seconds every 15 seconds; 7 readings were obtained for each mean value. Blood pressure was recorded directly from the intraarterial catheter, and heart rate was recorded from an electrocardiographic lead. All drugs were approved for human use by the Food and Drug Administration in the form of investigational new drug and were prepared following specific procedures to ensure accurate bioavailability and sterility of the solutions. Throughout all studies, volumes infused were matched by administration of variable amounts of normal saline solution.

Assessment of the Effects of Race on Vascular Responses to ETA Receptor Blockade in Normal Subjects and in Hypertensive Patients
Basal FBF measurements were obtained after a 15-minute infusion of saline at 1 mL/min. Normal subjects and hypertensive patients then received intraarterial infusion of BQ-123. BQ-123 (Peninsula Laboratories), a synthetic peptide with high potency of antagonism for the ETA receptor,19 was infused at 100 nmol/min (100 nmol/mL solution), a dose that effectively counteracts the vasoconstrictor effect of ET-1 infusion in the human forearm.20 BQ-123 was given for 60 minutes (1 mL/min infusion rate) and FBF was measured every 10 minutes.

Assessment of Vascular Responses to ET-1 in Black and White Hypertensive Patients
To determine whether differences exist in the vascular sensitivity to the hemodynamic effects of ET-1 between black and white hypertensives, experiments were performed, on a separate day, to compare the vasomotor responses to exogenous ET-1 in the 2 groups. To this end, after basal measurements were obtained, 5 black and 7 white hypertensives received intraarterial infusion of ET-1. ET-1 (Bachem Inc; 5 pmol/mL solution) was given at 5 pmol/min (1 mL/min infusion rate) for 60 minutes, and FBF was measured at 10-minute intervals.

Assessment of Vascular Responses to Selective ETA Blockade and Nonselective ETA/B Blockade in Black Hypertensive Patients
To investigate whether differences exist between vascular responses to selective ETA blockade and nonselective ETA/B blockade in black hypertensives, on a different occasion, 8 black patients received a co-infusion of BQ-123 and BQ-788. BQ-788 (Peninsula Laboratories; 50 nmol/mL solution), a highly selective synthetic antagonist of ETB receptors, was given at 50 nmol/min (1 mL/min infusion rate), a dose that allows a local concentration in the forearm more than 10-fold higher than the pA2 (negative logarithm of the molar concentration of antagonist that causes a 2-fold parallel shift to the right of the concentration-response curve) at the ETB receptor.21 The combination of BQ-123 (at the same dose as before) and BQ-788 was infused for 60 minutes. FBF measurements were obtained every 10 minutes and the response to the combination of BQ-123 and BQ-788 was compared with that observed in the same patients during the administration of BQ-123 alone.

Statistical Analyses
Two means were compared by Student’s t test. Within each group, changes in FBF from baseline in response to the infused drugs were assessed by 1-way ANOVA for repeated measures. Group comparisons of the responses to selective ETA blockade and to exogenous ET-1 infusion were performed by 2-way ANOVA. Comparison of the effects of selective ETA blockade and nonselective ETA/B blockade in black hypertensives was performed by 2-way ANOVA for repeated measures. When significant differences were found by ANOVA, post-hoc analyses for multiple comparisons were performed by Dunnett’s or Student-Newman-Keuls’ test, as appropriate. All calculated probability values are 2-tailed, and a probability value <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. All group data are reported as mean±SEM.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Mean arterial pressure and heart rate did not significantly change after infusion of any of the drugs used in the study, thus indicating that drug effects were limited to the infused forearm. Baseline FBF was not significantly different between groups at all times (all P>0.05).

Effects of ETA Receptor Blockade in Normal Subjects and in Hypertensive Patients
As previously reported, in control subjects, infusion of BQ-123 did not result in significant changes of FBF from baseline (6±3% increase; P=0.30). On the contrary, in hypertensive patients, BQ-123 administration resulted in a significant vasodilator response (19±4% increment in FBF from baseline; P<0.001). As a result, FBF values during selective ETA blockade were significantly higher in hypertensive patients than in normotensive subjects (Figure 1).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Graph showing FBF responses to BQ-123 (100 nmol/min) in normotensive subjects and hypertensive patients. Values represent mean±SEM. The probability value refers to the comparison between the 2 groups in FBF response from baseline during selective ETA blockade by 2-way ANOVA.

Effects of Race on the Vascular Responses to ETA Receptor Blockade in Normal Subjects and in Hypertensive Patients
In the normotensive group, FBF response to BQ-123 was similar between black (n =15) and white (n =22) subjects (5±2% versus 6±2%, respectively; P=0.85). In contrast, in the hypertensive population, the vasodilator effect of ETA receptor blockade was significantly higher in the black (n =13) compared with the white (n =14) patients (24±3% versus 15±3, respectively; P=0.01) (Figure 2).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Bars showing the average FBF responses to 60 minutes’ infusion of BQ-123 (100 nmol/min) in normotensive subjects and hypertensive patients according to race. Values represent mean±SEM. The probability values refer to the comparison in the FBF responses from baseline during selective ETA blockade by 2-way ANOVA.

Effects of Race on the Vascular Responses to ET-1 in Hypertensive Patients
Infusion of ET-1 induced a significant vasoconstrictor response in both black (n =5) and white (n =7) hypertensives (both P<0.001 versus baseline), without significant differences between the 2 groups (35±2% versus 37±2% decrease in FBF, respectively; P=0.46) (Figure 3).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Graph showing FBF responses to ET-1 (5 pmol/min) in hypertensive patients according to race. Values represent mean±SEM. The probability value refers to the comparison between the 2 groups in FBF response from baseline during ET-1 infusion by 2-way ANOVA.

Vascular Responses to Selective ETA and Nonselective ETA/B Blockade in Black Hypertensive Patients
In a subgroup of black hypertensive patients (n=8), nonselective ETA/B receptor blockade induced a vasodilator response similar to that observed in the same subjects during selective ETA antagonism (20±10% versus 25±10, respectively; P=0.66) (Figure 4).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Graph showing FBF responses to BQ-123 (100 nmol/min) alone or in combination with BQ-788 (50 nmol/min) in black hypertensive patients. Values represent mean±SEM. The probability value refers to the comparison in FBF response from baseline during selective ETA blockade versus nonselective ETA/B blockade by 2-way ANOVA for repeated measures.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The main finding of the present study is that ETA receptor blockade with BQ-123 results in a significantly higher forearm vasodilator response in black than in white hypertensive patients. In contrast, BQ-123 does not significantly affect forearm blood flow in either black or white healthy controls.

Diverse mechanisms may underlie the greater ETA-dependent vasoconstriction observed in black hypertensive patients compared with white hypertensive patients, such as an increased availability of ET-1 at the level of ETA receptors or an enhanced vascular sensitivity to the constrictor effects of ET-1. To better define the pathophysiological abnormalities underlying these ethnic differences, we compared forearm vascular responsiveness to exogenous ET-1 between black and white hypertensives. ET-1 infusion induced an equivalent vasoconstrictor response in both ethnic groups, suggesting that an increased production and/or a decreased clearance of ET-1 are the most likely mechanisms in play and arguing against the presence of an enhanced vascular reactivity to the peptide in blacks. Our results are in keeping with the evidence of an augmented ability for vascular ET-1 biosynthesis in hypertensive blacks, consistent with increased tissue endothelin converting enzyme-1a expression and activity22 and significantly higher plasma ET-1 concentrations.18

Several mechanisms may potentially account for a selectively enhanced vascular production of ET-1 in blacks. Physiologically, ET-1 gene expression is stimulated by numerous vasoconstrictor factors, including catecholamines and angiotensin II, and is inhibited by vasodilators such as nitric oxide (NO) and prostacyclin.23 It is possible that the amplified sympathetic reactivity to stressful environmental stimuli observed in blacks,24 and the concomitant decreased sensitivity to NO-dependent and adrenergic vasodilation,12 may lead to enhanced ET-1 gene transcription and ET-1 synthesis. This hypothesis is supported by recent data showing higher baseline levels of plasma ET-1 and exaggerated plasma ET-1 responses to behavioral and physical challenges in adolescent blacks with a family history of essential hypertension.25 Further, ET-1 may amplify the contractile response to other vasoactive agents, thus enhancing hemodynamic reactivity26 and promoting a self-maintained vasoconstrictor cycle.

Another potential mechanism that may contribute to the higher ET-1 plasma levels and activity observed in hypertensive black patients is a decreased clearance of ET-1. A significant proportion of ET-1 clearance seems to occur through endothelial cell ETB receptor binding and internalization.27 In vivo animal studies have shown that ETB receptor antagonism increases plasma ET-1 concentrations and prolongs its biological half life.28 Recent data demonstrate that hypertensive black subjects have a decreased endothelial cell expression of ETB receptors,22 which may hinder ET-1 clearance, thereby increasing bioavailability of the peptide at the ETA receptors. This possibility is consistent with the results obtained in the present study in the subgroup of hypertensive blacks in whom the hemodynamic effects of selective ETA and nonselective ETA/B blockade were compared. In those patients, the vasodilator response was similar under both experimental conditions, in contrast to our previous observations in a prevalently white population of hypertensive patients, in whom the combined infusion of BQ-123 and BQ-788 induced a greater vasodilation than the administration of BQ-123 alone.29 These findings suggest a "neutral" effect of endothelial and smooth muscle ETB receptors in determining the hemodynamic response to ET-1 in hypertensive blacks and are compatible with the possibility of a consensual down-regulation of both ETB receptors in these patients. However, the design of our investigation does not allow more definitive conclusions in this regard. Further studies will be necessary to better characterize the contribution of different ET receptor subtypes in the pathophysiology of the ET system in blacks with essential hypertension.

The results of this investigation may have important pathophysiological and clinical implications and may explain, at least in part, the increased cardiovascular risk present in black hypertensives. Thus, the multiple actions of ET-1, by altering renal function and promoting vascular remodeling, atherosclerotic plaque formation, and left ventricular hypertrophy, may contribute to the genesis and maintenance of essential hypertension and to the development its complications in these patients. Based on our observations, ET-1 receptor blockade might potentially exert beneficial effect in the treatment of essential hypertension and its cardiovascular consequences in black subjects.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Dr Cardillo is recipient of Cofinanziamento Ministero Istruzione, Università e Ricerca (MUIR COFIN) 2002 and Fondi d’Ateneo grants.


*    Footnotes
 
Guest Editor for this article was Oscar Carretero, Henry Ford Hospital, Mich.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. US Bureau of the Census. Statistical abstract of the United States: 1997. 117th ed. Washington DC: US Bureau of the Census; 1997: 14.
  2. Sempos C, Cooper R, Covar MG, et al. Divergence of the recent trends in coronary mortality for the four major race-sex groups in the United States. Am J Public Health. 1988; 78: 1422–1427.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Gillum RF, Mussolino ME, Madans JH. Coronary heart diseases incidence and survival in African-American women and men. The NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 127: 111–118.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Burt VL, Whelton P, Roccella EJ, et al. Prevalence of hypertension in the US adult population: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1981–1991. Hypertension. 1995; 25: 305–313.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Cornoni-Huntley J, LaCroix AZ, Havlick RJ. Race and sex differences in the impact of hypertension in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 1989; 149: 77–88.[Abstract]
  6. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Statistics of the United States, 1977: Mortality, Vol 2. Hyattsville, Md: US Department of Health, Education and Welfare; 1977.
  7. Weinberger MH, Miller JZ, Luft FC, et al. Definitions and characteristics of sodium sensitivity and blood pressure resistance. Hypertension. 1986; 8 (Suppl II): II127–II134.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Calhoun DA, Oparil S. Racial differences in the pathogenesis of hypertension. Am J Med Sci. 1995; 310: S86–S90.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Land CC, Stein MC, Brown MR, et al. Attenuation of isoproterenol-mediated vasodilatation in blacks. N Engl J Med. 1995; 333: 155–160.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Cardillo C, Kilcoyne CM, Cannon RO III et al. Racial differences in nitric oxide-mediated vasodilator response to mental stress in the forearm circulation. Hypertension. 1998; 31: 1235–1239.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Stein MC, Lang CC, Nelson R, et al. Vasodilation in black Americans: attenuated nitric oxide-mediated responses. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997; 62: 436–443.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Cardillo C, Kilcoyne CM, Cannon RO III et al. Attenuation of nucleotide-mediated smooth muscle relaxation in blacks as a cause of racial differences in vasodilator function. Circulation. 1999; 99: 90–95.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Cardillo C, Campia U, Kilcoyne CM, et al. Improved endothelium-dependent vasodilation after blockade of endothelin receptors in patients with essential hypertension. Circulation. 2002; 105: 452–456.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Schiffrin EL, Yuan Deng L, Sventek P, et al. Enhanced expression of endothelin-1 gene in resistance arteries in severe human essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 1997; 15: 57–63.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Rubanyi GM, Polokoff MA. Endothelins: molecular biology, biochemistry, pharmacology, physiology, and pathophysiology. Pharmacol Rev. 1994; 46: 325–415.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Ohichi T, Kuwaki T, Ling GY, et al. Elevation of blood pressure by genetic and pharmacologic disruption of the ETB receptor in mice. Am J Physiol. 1999; 45: R1071–R1077.
  17. Allcock GH, Venema RC, Pollock DM. ETA receptor blockade attenuates the hypertension but not renal dysfunction in DOCA-salt rats. Am J Physiol. 1998; 44: R245–R252.
  18. Ergul S, Parish DC, Puett D, et al. Racial differences in plasma endothelin-1 concentrations in individuals with essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1996; 28: 652–655.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Ihara M, Noguchi K, Saeki T, et al. Biological profiles of highly potent novel endothelin antagonists selective for the ETA receptor. Life Sci. 1992; 50: 247–255.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Haynes WG, Webb DJ. Contribution of endogenous generation of endothelin-1 to basal vascular tone. Lancet. 1994; 344: 852–854.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Ishikawa K, Ihara M, Noguchi K, et al. Biochemical and pharmacological profile of a potent and selective endothelin B-receptor antagonist, BQ-788. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994; 91: 4892–4896.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Grubbs AL, Anstadt MP, Ergul A. Saphenous vein endothelin system expression and activity in African American patients. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 22: 1122–1127.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Haynes WG, Webb JD. Endothelin as a regulator of cardiovascular function in health and disease. J Hypertens. 1998; 16: 1081–1098.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Stein CM, Lang CC, Singh I, et al. Increased vascular adrenergic vasoconstriction and decreased vasodilation in blacks: additive mechanisms leading to enhanced vascular reactivity. Hypertension. 2000; 36: 945–951.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Treiber FA, Jackson RW, Davis H, et al. Racial differences in endothelin-1 at rest and in response to acute stress in adolescent males. Hypertension. 2000; 35: 722–725.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Yang Z, Richard V, von Segesser L, et al. Threshold concentrations of endothelin-1 potentiate contractions to norepinephrine and serotonin in human arteries: a new mechanism of vasospasm? Circulation. 1990; 82: 188–195.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Dupuis J, Goresky CA, Fournier A. Pulmonary clearance f circulating endothelin-1 in dogs in vivo: exclusive role of ETB receptors. J Appl Physiol. 1996; 81: 1510–1515.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Fukoda T, Fujikawa T, Ozaki S, et al. Clearance of circulating endothelin-1 by ETB receptors in rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994; 199: 1461–1495.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Cardillo C, Kilcoyne CM, Waclawiw MA, et al. Role of endothelin in the increased vascular tone of patients with essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1999; 33: 753–758.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
B. Battistini, N. Berthiaume, N. F. Kelland, D. J. Webb, and D. E. Kohan
Profile of Past and Current Clinical Trials Involving Endothelin Receptor Antagonists: The Novel "-Sentan" Class of Drug.
Experimental Biology and Medicine, June 1, 2006; 231(6): 653 - 695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
C. Saha, G. J. Eckert, W. T. Ambrosius, T.-Y. Chun, M. A. Wagner, Q. Zhao, and J. H. Pratt
Improvement in Blood Pressure With Inhibition of the Epithelial Sodium Channel in Blacks With Hypertension
Hypertension, September 1, 2005; 46(3): 481 - 487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
D. G. Warnock and P. D. Bell
Improvement of Blood Pressure With Inhibition of the Epithelial Sodium Channel in Blacks With Hypertension
Hypertension, September 1, 2005; 46(3): 469 - 470.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
109/25/3191    most recent
01.CIR.0000130590.24107.D3v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Campia, U.
Right arrow Articles by Panza, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Campia, U.
Right arrow Articles by Panza, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide
Right arrow Risk Factors