This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schoepf, U. J. Articles by Costello, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schoepf, U. J. Articles by Costello, P. Related Collections Cardiovascular imaging agents/Techniques Deep vein thrombosis Pulmonary circulation and disease CT and MRI

(Circulation. 2004;109:2160-2167.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.

Review: Current Perspective

Spiral Computed Tomography for Acute Pulmonary Embolism

U. Joseph Schoepf, MD; Samuel Z. Goldhaber, MD; Philip Costello, MD

From the Department of Radiology (U.J.S., P.C.) and Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine (S.Z.G.), Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

Correspondence to U. Joseph Schoepf, MD, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail schoepf{at}bwh.harvard.edu

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Imaging Acute PE Conclusions References

 
There is still considerable debate about the optimal diagnostic imaging modality for acute pulmonary embolism. If imaging is deemed necessary from an initial clinical evaluation such as D-dimer testing, options include nuclear medicine scanning, catheter pulmonary angiography, and spiral CT. In many institutions, spiral CT is becoming established as the first-line imaging test in daily clinical practice. With spiral CT, thrombus is directly visualized, and both mediastinal and parenchymal structures are evaluated, which may provide important alternative or additional diagnoses. However, limitations for the accurate diagnosis of small peripheral emboli, with a reported miss rate of up to 30% with single-slice spiral CT so far, have prevented the unanimous embrace of spiral CT as the new standard of reference for imaging pulmonary embolism. The clinical significance of the detection and treatment of isolated peripheral pulmonary emboli is uncertain. Evidence is accumulating that it is safe practice to withhold anticoagulation in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism on the basis of a negative spiral CT study. Remaining concerns about the accuracy of spiral CT for pulmonary embolism detection may be overcome by the introduction of multidetector-row spiral CT. This widely available technology has improved visualization of peripheral pulmonary arteries and detection of small emboli. The most recent generation of multidetector-row spiral CT scanners appears to outperform competing imaging modalities for the accurate detection of central and peripheral pulmonary embolism. In this review, we assess the current role and future potential of CT in the diagnostic algorithm of acute pulmonary embolism.

Key Words: diagnosis • embolism • imaging • thrombosis

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Imaging Acute PE Conclusions References

 
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is protean in nature, continues to masquerade as other illnesses, and is frequently overlooked and misdiagnosed, at times even by experienced clinicians. Noninvasive imaging tests for PE are increasingly sophisticated and provide previously unimaginable fine resolution of peripheral pulmonary arteries. Despite technical progress, imaging the pulmonary arteries has remained costly and potentially harmful, even with noninvasive approaches. Therefore, imaging tests cannot be ordered on every patient who presents with a remote possibility of PE. Accordingly, diagnostic algorithms have been developed to rationalize the use of noninvasive imaging tests.

Ideally, there is a progression from clinical assessment to fundamental nonimaging tests before imaging of the pulmonary arteries ensues (Table 1). The diagnostic process can identify other important illnesses (such as myocardial infarction on ECG or pneumonia or pneumothorax on chest radiograph). Bedside tests have been refined to assess the clinical likelihood of PE. The test developed by Wells and colleagues,¹ for example, is a simple questionnaire for patients with possible PE. With 7 basic questions, the test can rapidly assess the clinical probability of PE.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 1. Diagnostic Approaches to Acute PE: Strengths and Weaknesses

Arterial blood gas analysis² and calculation of alveolar-arterial oxygen tension difference³ are not reliable tools to detect patients who have PE. The principal blood-screening test has become the D-dimer assay. D-dimer testing is highly sensitive and has a very high negative predictive value, so it is an excellent screening test for emergency department patients. At Brigham and Women’s Hospital’s Emergency Department, with 1106 consecutive assays for suspected PE, the sensitivity was 97% and the negative predictive value was 99.6%.⁴ Similar results have been obtained in other emergency departments.⁵ Initial evaluation and testing should be completed within several hours in the emergency department setting. At that point, the decision to proceed with direct chest imaging for PE must ensue. D-dimer is less useful for patients who are already hospitalized because the levels are elevated in many illnesses that mimic PE, such as pneumonia and myocardial infarction. D-dimer levels are also elevated in patients with cancer and sepsis, those who are pregnant, and those in the postoperative state. To increase the precision of the diagnostic workup, the standardized clinical assessment and D-dimer test result can be used together to help decide which patients warrant further workup.^6–8

Ordinarily, the workup for PE can stop if the D-dimer ELISA is normal. While awaiting results of the D-dimer, most patients should undergo ECG and chest radiography. The ECG may be normal in patients with massive PE. Sometimes, there are signs of right-side heart strain such as negative T waves in the precordial leads,⁹ right bundle-branch block, the classic S1Q3T3 pattern,¹⁰ and the recently described Qr in lead V₁.¹¹ The chest radiograph may be normal, even in patients with massive PE. The most common radiographic abnormality is cardiomegaly.¹²

The utility of venous ultrasonographic screening of patients without leg symptoms who have suspected PE is controversial.^13–16 If a diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) can be established in a patient with symptoms of PE, the course of therapy is most often predetermined. However, this approach may miss more than half of patients with PE,¹⁵ probably because the DVT has often completely embolized to the lungs. Also, venous ultrasonography is notoriously insensitive for diagnosing DVT in asymptomatic patients.^13,14,16 If CT is used as the primary imaging test for suspected PE, the feasibility of combining CT angiography of the pulmonary arteries with CT venography of the deep venous system for a comprehensive evaluation for venous thromboembolism has been demonstrated.^17,18

Finally, echocardiography is not recommended as a routine imaging test to diagnose suspected acute PE. Instead, echocardiography is most useful for risk stratification and prognostication after the diagnosis of PE has been established.^19,20

	Imaging Acute PE

Top Abstract Introduction Imaging Acute PE Conclusions References

 
Pulmonary Angiography, Nuclear Medicine Lung Scanning, and MRA
Catheter pulmonary angiography has been hailed as the "gold standard" technique for PE diagnosis and has the advantage of providing simultaneous hemodynamic information that may be useful for patient management. In reality, however, this test is infrequently performed.^21,22 The morbidity and mortality rates for this invasive test are reported to range from 3.5% to 6% and 0.2% to 0.5%, respectively.^23–25

Use of nuclear medicine imaging, once the first imaging study for suspected PE, is in decline^26,27 because of the high percentage of indeterminate studies (73% of all performed²⁸) and poor interobserver correlation.²⁹ Revised criteria for the interpretation of ventilation-perfusion examinations^30,31 and novel technologies in nuclear medicine such as SPECT³² can decrease the proportion of indeterminate scintigraphic studies but cannot offset the limitations inherent to a functional imaging test.³³ Different from other imaging tests, ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy is an indirect test for PE based on assessment of pulmonary perfusion. This differs from imaging modalities that allow direct visualization (Figure 1) of PE and other thoracic pathology.

View larger version (38K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Contrast-enhanced 16-slice CT examination of 72-year-old man with extensive, acute central PE with "saddle embolus" (arrows) extending into both central pulmonary arteries. Colored volume-rendering technique seen from an anterior (A) and anteriocranial (B) perspective allows intuitive visualization of location and extent of embolism.

Contrast-enhanced MRA^34,35 has acquisition protocols that lack sufficient spatial resolution for reliable evaluation of peripheral pulmonary arteries.^35,36 More important, this modality has not seen widespread use in the acutely ill patient with suspected PE because of a lack of general availability, relatively long examination times, and difficulties in patient monitoring.

Spiral CT for Imaging Acute PE
In many institutions, spiral CT is becoming the first-line imaging test for the assessment of patients with suspected acute PE in daily clinical practice. Both mediastinal and parenchymal structures are evaluated, and thrombus is directly visualized (Figure 1). Many patients with an initial suspicion of PE receive other diagnoses,³⁷ sometimes such potentially life-threatening diseases as aortic dissection, pneumonia, lung cancer (Figure 2), and pneumothorax.³⁸ With spiral CT, a specific cause for the patients’ symptoms and important additional diagnoses can be established in many cases.³³ In addition, not only intravascular thromboembolic filling defects but also other manifestations of precedent pulmonary thromboembolic, including parenchymal infarction (Figure 3), pleural effusion, vascular remodeling (dilation, pouches, thrombotic wall thickening), and oligemia (Figure 4), can readily be visualized with spiral CT. The interobserver agreement for spiral CT is better than for nuclear scintigraphy.^29,39 Spiral CT also appears to be the most cost-effective modality in the diagnostic algorithm of PE compared with algorithms that do not include spiral CT.⁴⁰

View larger version (145K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Contrast-enhanced 16-slice CT examination of patient with acute disseminated pulmonary emboli (arrows). As an incidental finding, examination also reveals focal lung lesion (open arrow) in left upper lobe that was later confirmed to be stage I small-cell lung cancer.

View larger version (87K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Patient status after acute PE. Wedge-shaped area of consolidation (arrows) in epidiaphragmal portion of lower lobe of left lung represents infarction of lung parenchyma secondary to acute PE. Shown is contrast-enhanced 16-slice multidetector-row spiral CT examination with multiplanar reformation in midcoronal (left) and left sagittal (right) plane.

View larger version (54K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. Sixteen-slice multidetector-row spiral CT angiogram in patient with recurrent thromboembolic disease. Displays are coronal maximum-intensity projection (A), coronal minimum-intensity projection (B), and volume-rendered technique seen from posterior (C). Pulmonary arteries (PA) in right lower lobe are most affected by PE and appear obliterated, with normal-sized pulmonary veins returning to left atrium (LA). Lung perfusion in lower lobes of lung is diminished but maintained in upper lobes (B). Blood flow to right lower lobe is maintained via bronchial arteries (BA), which are hypertrophied (arrow in A and C) and have formed collaterals bypassing occluded and obliterated pulmonary arteries. PV indicates pulmonary veins.

Spiral CT Limitations for Imaging Peripheral Pulmonary Emboli
The main impediment for spiral CT has been limitations of this modality for the accurate detection of small peripheral emboli.^41–43 Early studies comparing conventional single-slice spiral CT with selective pulmonary angiography demonstrated the high accuracy of spiral CT for detecting PE from the main pulmonary artery to the segmental arterial level^41,44,45 but suggested that subsegmental pulmonary emboli may be overlooked by spiral CT scanning. With older generations of conventional single-slice spiral CT scanners, false-negative rates of up to 30%^41–43 were reported.

Detection and Treatment of Isolated Peripheral Pulmonary Emboli: Clinical Significance
Limitations for the accurate diagnosis of isolated peripheral emboli with single-slice spiral CT so far have prevented the unanimous embrace of spiral CT as the new standard of reference for imaging PE. The clinical significance of such isolated peripheral emboli, however, in subsegmental or smaller pulmonary arteries in the absence of central emboli is uncertain. It has been shown that 6%²⁸ to 30%⁴⁶ of patients with documented PE present with clots only in subsegmental and smaller arteries. It is speculated that one important function of the lung is to prevent small emboli from entering the arterial circulation. Such emboli may form even in healthy individuals, although this notion has never been substantiated.⁴⁷ Controversy also exists about the treatment of small emboli and whether this will result in improved clinical outcome.^48,49 It is assumed that the presence of such emboli may indicate current DVT that potentially heralds more severe embolic events.^37,46,50 A burden of small peripheral emboli is also thought to have prognostic relevance in individuals with cardiopulmonary disease⁴⁶ and for the development of chronic pulmonary hypertension in patients with thromboembolic disease.⁴⁶

Although the accuracy of conventional single-slice spiral CT for the detection of isolated peripheral emboli may be limited, encouraging data are accumulating on the high negative predictive value of a normal spiral CT study^29,51–60 (Table 2). According to these retrospective^29,51–58 and prospective^59,60 studies, patient outcome is not adversely affected if anticoagulation is withheld on the basis of a negative spiral CT study. The negative predictive value of a normal spiral CT study is high, compares very favorably with catheter pulmonary angiography,⁶¹ and approaches 98%, regardless of whether underlying lung disease is present.^55,56 The frequency of a subsequent clinical diagnosis of PE or DVT after a negative spiral CT pulmonary angiogram is low, lower than that after a negative or low-probability V-Q scan.^29,53 Thus, even single-slice spiral CT appears to be a reliable imaging tool for excluding clinically relevant PE, so it appears that anticoagulation can be safely withheld when the spiral CT scan is normal and of good diagnostic quality.^53,57,59,60

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 2. Patient Outcome if Anticoagulation Is Withheld on the Basis of a Negative Spiral CT Study in Patients With Suspected PE: Peer-Reviewed Publications

Advantages of Multidetector-Row Spiral CT for PE Imaging
Remaining concerns about the accuracy of spiral CT for PE detection may be overcome by the introduction of multidetector-row spiral CT. Multidetector-row spiral CT, with simultaneous acquisition of 4 sections per scanner rotation instead of a single section, first became available in 1998.^62,63 The advantages of fast, high-resolution image acquisition with multidetector-row spiral CT led to the widespread embrace of this modality, with close to 3000 installed units in the United States. The current generation of 4-, 6-, 8-, 10-, and 16-slice multidetector-row spiral CT scanners now allows acquisition of the entire chest with 1-mm or submillimeter resolution within a short single breath-hold (<10 seconds in the case of the 16-slice CT) (Figure 5). Covering substantial parts of the human anatomy with ever-finer spatial resolution has obvious advantages for imaging PE. Shorter breath-hold times benefit patients with underlying lung disease and reduce the percentage of nondiagnostic CT scans.⁶⁴ High-resolution multidetector-row spiral CT data can be transformed easily for 2D and 3D visualization. This may, in some instances, improve PE diagnosis but is generally of greater importance for conveying information on localization and extent of embolic disease in a more intuitive display format (Figure 1).

View larger version (75K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 5. Normal pulmonary vessels in 56-year-old man presenting with mild chest pain after long-distance flight. Contrast-enhanced 16-slice CT examination covers entire chest within 10-second examination time, allowing analysis of even the most peripheral pulmonary vessels with exquisite detail. Coronal reconstruction is shown by maximum-intensity projection (A) and 3D volume-rendering techniques (B).

Probably the most important advantage of multidetector-row spiral CT is improved diagnosis of small peripheral emboli (Figure 6). The degree of accuracy that could be achieved for the visualization of subsegmental pulmonary arteries and for the detection of emboli in these vessels with previously available modalities (single-slice, dual-slice, and electron-beam CT) was found to range between 61% and 79%.^41,65–67 The high spatial resolution (ie, 0.6x0.6x0.6 mm in the x , y, and z extensions) of multidetector-row spiral CT data sets now allows evaluation of pulmonary vessels down to 6th-order branches and significantly increases the detection rate of segmental and subsegmental pulmonary emboli.^68–70 This improved detection rate is likely due to the accurate analysis of progressively smaller vessels by use of thinner sections. Animal experiments that use artificial emboli as an independent gold standard indicate that high-resolution 4-slice multidetector-row spiral CT is at least as accurate as invasive pulmonary angiography for the detection of small peripheral emboli. The interobserver correlation for confident diagnosis of subsegmental emboli with high-resolution multidetector-row spiral CT exceeds the reproducibility of selective pulmonary angiography.^69,71,72

View larger version (58K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 6. Contrast-enhanced 16-slice CT examination with 0.75-mm slice thickness in 45-year-old man with DVT in left calf after long-distance flight. Isolated peripheral pulmonary embolus in subsegmental pulmonary artery in lower lobe of left lung is visualized on 3 consecutive transaxial sections (arrows in A) and on oblique-sagittal multiplanar reformat (arrow in B). The 3D volume-rendered display seen from posterior shows isolated peripheral filling defect (arrow in C) within otherwise normal pulmonary vascular tree.

The true accuracy of multidetector-row spiral CT for the detection of small peripheral emboli in patients with suspected PE will be difficult to determine. As a direct result of high-resolution imaging capabilities, small peripheral clots that may have gone unnoticed in the past are now frequently seen, often in patients with minor symptoms (Figure 6). It appears highly unlikely that pulmonary angiography will be performed on a patient merely to prove the presence of a small (2 to 3 mm) isolated embolus.

The efficacy of multidetector-row spiral CT in patients suspected of having acute PE is currently being assessed by the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) II⁷³ study. This prospective multicenter study began recruiting patients in 2001 and is expected to complete recruitment in 2004. In contrast to the original PIOPED²⁸ study, which used contrast pulmonary angiography as the primary reference test for PE, PIOPED II uses a composite reference test for venous thromboembolism that is based on the ventilation/perfusion lung scan, venous compression ultrasound of the lower extremities, digital subtraction pulmonary angiography, and contrast venography in various combinations to establish the PE status of the patient.⁷³

	Conclusions

Top Abstract Introduction Imaging Acute PE Conclusions References

 
CT has become an attractive means for a safe, highly accurate, cost-effective diagnosis of acute PE and may provide alternative diagnoses and explanations for symptoms in the absence of PE. Multidetector-row spiral CT technology has overcome past limitations of CT and is emerging as a preferred modality for imaging patients with suspected acute PE. New-generation multidetector-row spiral CT scanners now challenge catheter pulmonary angiography, once the standard of reference, for the accurate detection of PE.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Imaging Acute PE Conclusions References

 

1. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost. 2000; 83: 416–420.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
   
2. Stein PD, Goldhaber SZ, Henry JW, et al. Arterial blood gas analysis in the assessment of suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Chest. 1996; 109: 78–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
3. Stein PD, Goldhaber SZ, Henry JW. Alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient in the assessment of acute pulmonary embolism. Chest. 1995; 107: 139–143.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
4. Dunn KL, Wolf JP, Dorfman DM, et al. Normal D-dimer levels in emergency department patients suspected of acute pulmonary embolism. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 40: 1475–1478.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
5. Kline JA, Nelson RD, Jackson RE, et al. Criteria for the safe use of D-dimer testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a multicenter US study. Ann Emerg Med. 2002; 39: 144–152.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
   
6. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and D-dimer. Ann Intern Med. 2001; 135: 98–107.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
7. Kruip MJ, Slob MJ, Schijen JH, et al. Use of a clinical decision rule in combination with D-dimer concentration in diagnostic workup of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective management study. Arch Intern Med. 2002; 162: 1631–1635.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
8. Kruip MJ, Leclercq MG, van der Heul C, et al. Diagnostic strategies for excluding pulmonary embolism in clinical outcome studies: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138: 941–951.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
9. Ferrari E, Imbert A, Chevalier T, et al. The ECG in pulmonary embolism: predictive value of negative T waves in precordial leads: 80 case reports. Chest. 1997; 111: 537–543.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
10. Daniel KR, Courtney DM, Kline JA. Assessment of cardiac stress from massive pulmonary embolism with 12-lead ECG. Chest. 2001; 120: 474–481.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
11. Kucher N, Walpoth N, Wustmann K, et al. QR in V1: an ECG sign associated with right ventricular strain and adverse clinical outcome in pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J. 2003; 24: 1113–1119.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
12. Elliott CG, Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, et al. Chest radiographs in acute pulmonary embolism: results from the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry. Chest. 2000; 118: 33–38.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
13. Jongbloets LM, Lensing AW, Koopman MM, et al. Limitations of compression ultrasound for the detection of symptomless postoperative deep vein thrombosis. Lancet. 1994; 343: 1142–1144.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
14. Wells PS, Lensing AW, Davidson BL, et al. Accuracy of ultrasound for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in asymptomatic patients after orthopedic surgery: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 1995; 122: 47–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
15. Turkstra F, Kuijer PM, van Beek EJ, et al. Diagnostic utility of ultrasonography of leg veins in patients suspected of having pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 126: 775–781.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
16. Mac Gillavry MR, Sanson BJ, Buller HR, et al. Compression ultrasonography of the leg veins in patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism: is a more extensive assessment of compressibility useful? Thromb Haemost. 2000; 84: 973–976.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
17. Loud P, Grossman CD, Klippenstein DL, et al. Combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography: a new diagnostic technique for suspected thromboembolic disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998; 170: 951–954.[Free Full Text]
    
18. Cham MD, Yankelevitz DF, Shaham D, et al. Deep venous thrombosis: detection by using indirect CT venography: the Pulmonary Angiography-Indirect CT Venography Cooperative Group. Radiology. 2000; 216: 744–751.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
19. Ribeiro A, Lindmarker P, Johnsson H, et al. Pulmonary embolism: one-year follow-up with echocardiography Doppler and five-year survival analysis. Circulation. 1999; 99: 1325–1330.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
20. Goldhaber SZ. Echocardiography in the management of pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 136: 691–700.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
21. Crawford T, Yoon C, Wolfson K, et al. The effect of imaging modality on patient management in the evaluation of pulmonary thromboembolism. J Thorac Imaging. 2001; 16: 163–169.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
22. Prologo JD, Glauser J. Variable diagnostic approach to suspected pulmonary embolism in the ED of a major academic tertiary care center. Am J Emerg Med. 2002; 20: 5–9.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
23. Mills SR, Jackson DC, Older RA, et al. The incidence, etiologies, and avoidance of complications of pulmonary angiography in a large series. Radiology. 1980; 136: 295–299.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
24. Stein P, Athanasoulis C, Alavi A, et al. Complications and validity of pulmonary angiography in acute pulmonary embolus. Circulation. 1992; 85: 462–468.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
25. Hudson ER, Smith TP, McDermott VG, et al. Pulmonary angiography performed with iopamidol: complications in 1,434 patients. Radiology. 1996; 198: 61–65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
26. Schibany N, Fleischmann D, Thallinger C, et al. Equipment availability and diagnostic strategies for suspected pulmonary embolism in Austria. Eur Radiol. 2001; 11: 2287–2294.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
27. Leveau P. Diagnostic strategy in pulmonary embolism: National French survey. Presse Med. 2002; 31: 929–932.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
28. PIOPED Investigators. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. JAMA. 1990; 95: 498–502.
    
29. Blachere H, Latrabe V, Montaudon M, et al. Pulmonary embolism revealed on helical CT angiography: comparison with ventilation-perfusion radionuclide lung scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000; 174: 1041–1047.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
30. Stein PD, Relyea B, Gottschalk A. Evaluation of individual criteria for low probability interpretation of ventilation-perfusion lung scans. J Nucl Med. 1996; 37: 577–581.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
31. Stein PD, Gottschalk A. Review of criteria appropriate for a very low probability of pulmonary embolism on ventilation-perfusion lung scans: a position paper. Radiographics. 2000; 20: 99–105.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
32. Bajc M, Bitzen U, Olsson B, et al. Lung ventilation/perfusion SPECT in the artificially embolized pig. J Nucl Med. 2002; 43: 640–647.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
33. Garg K, Welsh CH, Feyerabend AJ, et al. Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with spiral CT and ventilation-perfusion scanning: correlation with pulmonary angiographic results or clinical outcome. Radiology. 1998; 208: 201–208.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
34. Meaney J, Weg JG, Chenevert TL, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with magnetic resonance angiography. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336: 1422–1427.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
35. Oudkerk M, van Beek EJ, Wielopolski P, et al. Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and conventional pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a prospective study. Lancet. 2002; 359: 1643–1647.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
36. Gupta A, Frazer CK, Ferguson JM, et al. Acute pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with MR angiography. Radiology. 1999; 210: 353–359.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
37. Hull R, Raskob GE, Ginsberg JS, et al. A noninvasive strategy for the treatment of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med. 1994; 154: 289–297.[Abstract]
    
38. van Rossum AB, Pattynama PM, Mallens WM, et al. Can helical CT replace scintigraphy in the diagnostic process in suspected pulmonary embolism? A retrolective-prolective cohort study focusing on total diagnostic yield. Eur Radiol. 1998; 8: 90–96.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
39. van Rossum AB, van Erkel AR, van Persijn van Meerten EL, et al. Accuracy of helical CT for acute pulmonary embolism: ROC analysis of observer performance related to clinical experience. Eur Radiol. 1998; 8: 1160–1164.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
40. van Erkel AR, van Rossum AB, Bloem JL, et al. Spiral CT angiography for suspected pulmonary embolism: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Radiology. 1996; 201: 29–36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
41. Goodman LR, Curtin JJ, Mewissen MW, et al. Detection of pulmonary embolism in patients with unresolved clinical and scintigraphic diagnosis: helical CT versus angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995; 164: 1369–1374.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
42. Drucker EA, Rivitz SM, Shepard JA, et al. Acute pulmonary embolism: assessment of helical CT for diagnosis. Radiology. 1998; 209: 235–241.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
43. Perrier A, Howarth N, Didier D, et al. Performance of helical computed tomography in unselected outpatients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med. 2001; 135: 88–97.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
44. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Deschildre F, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with spiral CT: comparison with pulmonary angiography and scintigraphy. Radiology. 1996; 200: 699–706.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
45. Teigen CL, Maus TP, Sheedy PF II, et al. Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced electron beam CT and comparison with pulmonary angiography. Radiology. 1995; 194: 313–319.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
46. Oser RF, Zuckerman DA, Gutierrez FR, et al. Anatomic distribution of pulmonary emboli at pulmonary angiography: implications for cross sectional imaging. Radiology. 1996; 199: 31–35.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
47. Tetalman MR, Hoffer PB, Heck LL, et al. Perfusion lung scan in normal volunteers. Radiology. 1973; 106: 593–594.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
48. Novelline R, Baltarowich O, Athanasoulis C, et al. The clinical course of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and a negative pulmonary angiogram. Radiology. 1978; 126: 561–567.[Abstract]
    
49. Cauvain O, Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, et al. Spiral CT angiography in the diagnosis of central pulmonary embolism: comparison with pulmonary angiography and scintigraphy. Rev Mal Respir. 1996; 13: 141–153.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
50. Patriquin L, Khorasani R, Polak JF. Correlation of diagnostic imaging and subsequent autopsy findings in patients with pulmonary embolism. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998; 171: 347–349.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
51. Garg K, Sieler H, Welsh CH, et al. Clinical validity of helical CT being interpreted as negative for pulmonary embolism: implications for patient treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999; 172: 1627–1631.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
52. Lomis NN, Yoon HC, Moran AG, et al. Clinical outcomes of patients after a negative spiral CT pulmonary arteriogram in the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999; 10: 707–712.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
53. Goodman LR, Lipchik RJ, Kuzo RS, et al. Subsequent pulmonary embolism: risk after a negative helical CT pulmonary angiogram: prospective comparison with scintigraphy. Radiology. 2000; 215: 535–542.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
54. Gottsater A, Berg A, Centergard J, et al. Clinically suspected pulmonary embolism: is it safe to withhold anticoagulation after a negative spiral CT? Eur Radiol. 2001; 11: 65–72.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
55. Ost D, Rozenshtein A, Saffran L, et al. The negative predictive value of spiral computed tomography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in patients with nondiagnostic ventilation-perfusion scans. Am J Med. 2001; 110: 16–21.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
56. Tillie-Leblond I, Mastora I, Radenne F, et al. Risk of pulmonary embolism after a negative spiral CT angiogram in patients with pulmonary disease: 1-year clinical follow-up study. Radiology. 2002; 223: 461–467.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
57. Swensen SJ, Sheedy PF 2nd, Ryu JH, et al. Outcomes after withholding anticoagulation from patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism and negative computed tomographic findings: a cohort study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002; 77: 130–138.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
58. Nilsson T, Olausson A, Johnsson H, et al. Negative spiral CT in acute pulmonary embolism. Acta Radiol. 2002; 43: 486–491.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
59. Musset D, Parent F, Meyer G, et al. Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study. Lancet. 2002; 360: 1914–1920.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
60. van Strijen MJ, de Monye W, Schiereck J, et al. Single-detector helical computed tomography as the primary diagnostic test in suspected pulmonary embolism: a multicenter clinical management study of 510 patients. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138: 307–314.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
61. Henry JW, Relyea B, Stein PD. Continuing risk of thromboemboli among patients with normal pulmonary angiograms. Chest. 1995; 107: 1375–1378.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
62. Klingenbeck-Regn K, Schaller S, Flohr T, et al. Subsecond multi-slice computed tomography: basics and applications. Eur J Radiol. 1999; 31: 110–124.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
63. Hu H, He HD, Foley WD, et al. Four multidetector-row helical CT: image quality and volume coverage speed. Radiology. 2000; 215: 55–62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
64. Remy-Jardin M, Tillie-Leblond I, Szapiro D, et al. CT angiography of pulmonary embolism in patients with underlying respiratory disease: impact of multislice CT on image quality and negative predictive value. Eur Radiol. 2002; 12: 1971–1978.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
65. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Artaud D, et al. Peripheral pulmonary arteries: optimization of the spiral CT acquisition protocol. Radiology. 1997; 204: 157–163.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
66. Qanadli SD, Hajjam ME, Mesurolle B, et al. Pulmonary embolism detection: prospective evaluation of dual-section helical CT versus selective pulmonary arteriography in 157 patients. Radiology. 2000; 217: 447–455.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
67. Schoepf UJ, Helmberger T, Holzknecht N, et al. Segmental and subsegmental pulmonary arteries: evaluation with electron- beam versus spiral CT. Radiology. 2000; 214: 433–439.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
68. Ghaye B, Szapiro D, Mastora I, et al. Peripheral pulmonary arteries: how far in the lung does multi-detector row spiral CT allow analysis? Radiology. 2001; 219: 629–636.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
69. Schoepf U, Holzknecht N, Helmberger TK, et al. Subsegmental pulmonary emboli: improved detection with thin-collimation multidetector-row spiral CT. Radiology. 2002; 222: 483–490.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
70. Patel S, Kazerooni EA, Cascade PN. Pulmonary embolism: optimization of small pulmonary artery visualization at multi-detector row CT. Radiology. 2003; 227: 455–460.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
71. Diffin D, Leyendecker JR, Johnson SP, et al. Effect of anatomic distribution of pulmonary emboli on interobserver agreement in the interpretation of pulmonary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998; 171: 1085–1089.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
72. Stein PD, Henry JW, Gottschalk A. Reassessment of pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: relation of interpreter agreement to the order of the involved pulmonary arterial branch. Radiology. 1999; 210: 689–691.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
73. Gottschalk A, Stein PD, Goodman LR, et al. Overview of prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis II. Semin Nucl Med. 2002; 32: 173–182.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. M. Subramaniam, J. Mandrekar, C. Chang, D. Blair, K. Gilbert, P. J. Peller, J. Sleigh, and N. Karalus Pulmonary Embolism Outcome: A Prospective Evaluation of CT Pulmonary Angiographic Clot Burden Score and ECG Score Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): 1599 - 1604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. R. Anderson, S. R. Kahn, M. A. Rodger, M. J. Kovacs, T. Morris, A. Hirsch, E. Lang, I. Stiell, G. Kovacs, J. Dreyer, et al. Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography vs Ventilation-Perfusion Lung Scanning in Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, December 19, 2007; 298(23): 2743 - 2753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Glassroth Imaging of Pulmonary Embolism: Too Much of a Good Thing? JAMA, December 19, 2007; 298(23): 2788 - 2789. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Remy-Jardin, M. Pistolesi, L. R. Goodman, W. B. Gefter, A. Gottschalk, J. R. Mayo, and H. D. Sostman Management of Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism in the Era of CT Angiography: A Statement from the Fleischner Society Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 315 - 329. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Ersoy, S. Z. Goldhaber, T. Cai, T. Luu, J. Rosebrook, R. Mulkern, and F. Rybicki Time-Resolved MR Angiography: A Primary Screening Examination of Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism and Contraindications to Administration of Iodinated Contrast Material Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2007; 188(5): 1246 - 1254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Siragusa, A. Malato, F. Falaschi, F. Porro, R. Anastasio, A. Giarratano, L. L. Coco, M. C. Buonanno, E. Maggi, M. A. Bressan, et al. Deferral of assessment of pulmonary embolism Haematologica, March 1, 2007; 92(3): 410 - 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C Hoskins and M Carpenter Virtual pulmonary arterioscopy in pulmonary embolic disease Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2006; 79(946): 779 - 784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Onuma, K. Tanabe, G. Nakazawa, J. Aoki, H. Nakajima, K. Ibukuro, and K. Hara Noncardiac Findings in Cardiac Imaging With Multidetector Computed Tomography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 18, 2006; 48(2): 402 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. K. Yousefzadeh, M. B. Ward, and C. Reft Internal Barium Shielding to Minimize Fetal Irradiation in Spiral Chest CT: A Phantom Simulation Experiment. Radiology, June 1, 2006; 239(3): 751 - 758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P.-M. Roy, G. Meyer, B. Vielle, C. Le Gall, F. Verschuren, F. Carpentier, P. Leveau, A. Furber, and for the EMDEPU Study Group* Appropriateness of Diagnostic Management and Outcomes of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Ann Intern Med, February 7, 2006; 144(3): 157 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Kucher, E. Rossi, M. De Rosa, and S. Z. Goldhaber Massive Pulmonary Embolism Circulation, January 31, 2006; 113(4): 577 - 582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Parasuraman and S. Z. Goldhaber Venous Thromboembolism in Children Circulation, January 17, 2006; 113(2): e12 - e16. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Writing Group for the Christopher Study Investigat Effectiveness of Managing Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Using an Algorithm Combining Clinical Probability, D-Dimer Testing, and Computed Tomography JAMA, January 11, 2006; 295(2): 172 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. D. Hull Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism With Improved Certainty and Simplicity JAMA, January 11, 2006; 295(2): 213 - 215. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Ghuysen, B Ghaye, V Willems, B Lambermont, P Gerard, R F Dondelinger, and V D'Orio Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography and prognostic significance in patients with acute pulmonary embolism Thorax, November 1, 2005; 60(11): 956 - 961. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Spuentrup, M. Katoh, A. J. Wiethoff, E. C. Parsons Jr., R. M. Botnar, A. H. Mahnken, R. W. Gunther, and A. Buecker Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Pulmonary Emboli with a Fibrin-specific Contrast Agent Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 15, 2005; 172(4): 494 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]