(Circulation. 2004;109:e172-e173.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Correspondence |
Division of Cardiology, Terrence Donnelly Heart Center, St Michaels Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
To the Editor:
We read with great interest the recent report by Nagaya et al1 describing a "novel" therapeutic approach for experimental pulmonary hypertension using hybrid cell and gene therapy. We are happy to see that these data provide independent confirmation of the efficacy of cell-based gene therapy for pulmonary vascular disease that we have previously described in a series of earlier reports.24
The novel feature of the Nagaya et al1 report is the use of a "regenerative" cell that potentially could contribute to vascular repair, ie, endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs); however, their data suggest that the majority of the benefit was still derived from the "gene" rather than the "cell therapy." In our published reports, somatic cells (ie, pulmonary smooth muscle cells) were used to target gene therapy to the distal lung vasculature, and thus the improvement in pulmonary hemodynamics and remodeling could be attributed entirely to gene therapy. In these experiments, mock-transfected cells conferred no benefit, and the efficacy of cell-based gene transfer was attributed to subselective targeting of the therapeutic transgene to the distal arteriolar bed by virtue of the ability of the lung microcirculation to filter and trap these genetically engineered cells.3 Nagaya et al1 used the potent vasodilator gene, adrenomedullin, whereas we have described a similar benefit with another vasodilator gene,2 as well as with angiogenic genes (vascular endothelial growth factor and angiopoietin-1).34
Indeed, our studies have raised the possibility that the improvement in pulmonary hemodynamics may have been due to the ability of "angiogenic" genes to induce regeneration of damaged distal pulmonary vasculature.3,4 With this in mind, the relatively small benefit described in the recent Circulation report in response to EPC therapy alone (16% decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance) is of interest and is perhaps consistent with the ability of these cells to repair and regenerate vascular endothelium in ischemic models. However, the modest nature of the effect of EPCs alone (compared with adrenomedullin-transfected cells) in the Nagaya et al1 study might not reflect the true therapeutic potential of this approach, as these cells were isolated from human cord blood and used in a rat model. It is possible that as a result of important interspecies differences, these xenogenic cells may not be as well suited for pulmonary vascular repair as "autologous" progenitor cells. Indeed, very recent results from our group show near-complete prevention of pulmonary hypertension in the rat monocrotaline model using syngeneic bone marrowderived EPCs,5 suggesting substantial benefit of progenitor cell therapy alone.
References
Departments of Internal Medicine and Perinatology, National Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan
Departments of Biochemistry, Cardiac Physiology, and Structural Analysis, National Cardiovascular Center Research Institute, Osaka, Japan
Cardiovascular Division, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
Department of Physiology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
Department of Biomaterials, Field of Tissue Engineering, Institute for Frontier Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Hyogo Collage of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
Department of Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation, Kobe, Japan
We thank Drs Stewart, Zhao, and Courtman for their letter to the editor. In our study,1 human umbilical cord bloodderived endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) were transplanted to immunodeficient nude rats. Transplantation of EPCs alone modestly attenuated monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension (16% decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance). On the other hand, recent results from Stewarts group have shown near-complete prevention of monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension using syngeneic EPCs.2 Thus, autologous EPCs may be more suitable for pulmonary vascular repair than xenogenic cells, as they stated. In addition, we agree with them regarding the inhibitory effects of angiogenic factors on monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension in rats. In humans, however, little information is available regarding the effects of angiogenic factors on pulmonary hemodynamics. Some investigators have reported that angiogenic factors including vascular endothelial growth factor and angiopoietin-1 contribute to the development of pulmonary vascular remodeling.3 Thus, it remains unknown whether angiogenic factors have beneficial effects on pulmonary arterial hypertension in humans.
Nevertheless, intravenously administered EPCs home to sites of injured endothelium without wedging into the distal pulmonary vasculature.1 These findings raise the possibility that transplanted EPCs may serve not only as a tissue-engineering tool to reconstruct the pulmonary vasculature, but also as a vehicle for gene delivery to injured pulmonary endothelium. Adrenomedullin, a potent pulmonary vasodilator peptide, plays an important role in the regulation of pulmonary vascular tone.4 Therefore, in the clinical setting, vasodilator genetransduced EPCs would be a promising therapeutic strategy if transplantation of EPCs alone failed to ameliorate pulmonary hypertension in humans.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G.-P. Diller, S. van Eijl, D. O. Okonko, L. S. Howard, O. Ali, T. Thum, S. J. Wort, E. Bedard, J. S. R. Gibbs, J. Bauersachs, et al. Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Patients With Eisenmenger Syndrome and Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Circulation, June 10, 2008; 117(23): 3020 - 3030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X.-X. Wang, F.-R. Zhang, Y.-P. Shang, J.-H. Zhu, X.-D. Xie, Q.-M. Tao, J.-H. Zhu, and J.-Z. Chen Transplantation of Autologous Endothelial Progenitor Cells May Be Beneficial in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 10, 2007; 49(14): 1566 - 1571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. D. Zhao, D. W. Courtman, Y. Deng, L. Kugathasan, Q. Zhang, and D. J. Stewart Rescue of Monocrotaline-Induced Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Using Bone Marrow-Derived Endothelial-Like Progenitor Cells: Efficacy of Combined Cell and eNOS Gene Therapy in Established Disease Circ. Res., March 4, 2005; 96(4): 442 - 450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |