Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2003;108:945-950
Published online before print August 18, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000085168.02782.2C
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
108/8/945    most recent
01.CIR.0000085168.02782.2Cv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kühl, U.
Right arrow Articles by Kandolf, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kühl, U.
Right arrow Articles by Kandolf, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pericardial disease
Right arrow Myocardial cardiomyopathy disease
Right arrow Other etiology

(Circulation. 2003;108:945.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Parvovirus B19 Infection Mimicking Acute Myocardial Infarction

Uwe Kühl, MD, PhD; Matthias Pauschinger, MD; Thomas Bock, MD; Karin Klingel, MD; C. Peter Lothar Schwimmbeck, MD; Bettina Seeberg; Lars Krautwurm; Wolfgang Poller, MD; Heinz-Peter Schultheiss, MD; Reinhard Kandolf, MD, PhD

From the Medical Clinic II (U.K., M.P., C.P.L.S., B.S., L.K., W.P., H.-P.S.), Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Pathology (T.B., K.K., R.K.), University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Correspondence to Uwe Kühl, PhD, Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology and Pneumonology, Benjamin Franklin Hospital, Free University of Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, D-12200 Berlin, Germany. E-mail dcmkuehl{at}zedat.fu-berlin.de

Received February 19, 2003; revision received June 2, 2003; accepted June 3, 2003.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Enteroviruses (EVs) and adenoviruses (ADVs) have been considered common causes of myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy. In the present study, we report on the association of parvovirus B19 (PVB19) genomes in the clinical setting of acute myocarditis.

Methods and Results— This study included 24 consecutive patients admitted to our hospital within 24 hours after onset of chest pain. Acute myocardial infarction had been excluded in all patients by coronary angiography. Endomyocardial biopsies were analyzed by nested polymerase chain reaction/reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction for EV, ADV, PVB19, human cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, Chlamydia pneumoniae, influenza virus A and B, and Borrelia burgdorferi genomes, respectively, followed by direct sequencing of the amplification products. All patients presented with acute onset of angina pectoris and ST-segment elevations or T-wave inversion mimicking acute myocardial infarction. Mean baseline peak creatinine kinase and creatine kinase-isoenzyme fraction were 342±241 U/L and 32±20 U/L, respectively. Mean troponin T was increased to 7.5±15.0 ng/mL and C-reactive protein to 91±98 mg/mL. Eighteen patients had global or regional wall motion abnormalities (ejection fraction 62.5±15.5%). Histological analysis excluded the presence of active or borderline myocarditis in all but one patient. PVB19, EV, and ADV genomes were detected in the myocardium of 12, 3, and 2 patients, respectively (71%). Follow-up biopsies of virus-positive patients (11 of 17) demonstrated persistence of PVB19 genomes in 6 of 6 patients, EV genomes in 2 of 3 patients, and ADV genomes in 1 of 2 patients, respectively.

Conclusions— Virus genomes can be demonstrated in 71% of patients with normal coronary anatomy, clinically mimicking acute myocardial infarction. In addition to EVs and ADVs, PVB19 was the most frequent pathogen.


Key Words: myocarditis • viruses • pericarditis • biopsy • polymerase chain reaction


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Myocarditis is the term used to indicate infectious, toxic, or autoimmune processes causing inflammation of the heart. The clinical spectrum of myocarditis includes asymptomatic patients who may have electrocardiographic abnormalities, patients with signs of clinical heart failure and ventricular dilatation, and patients with symptoms of fulminant heart failure and severe left ventricular dysfunction without cardiac dilatation.1 Myocarditis can also mimic acute myocardial infarction, with acute onset of chest pain, ECG abnormalities, serum creatinine kinase elevation, arrhythmias, or hemodynamic instability.2–6

Patients with myocarditis may present with or without a history of a recent flu-like syndrome accompanied by fever, arthralgias, and malaise. Most cases with acute onset in otherwise healthy people are considered to have an infectious origin. Unfortunately, the clinical diagnosis of myocarditis remains a challenge because of the nonspecific pattern of clinical presentation and the lack of universally accepted and standardized diagnostic criteria. The discordance between clinical and histological features of acute myocarditis and the inherent limitation of histological diagnosis necessitates further diagnostic procedures to establish the infectious origin of the acute disease. Recent studies suggest that assessment of viral genomes in endomyocardial biopsies may provide further diagnostic and prognostic information, as well as discriminate between autoimmune and viral myocarditis.

Among others, enteroviruses (EVs) and adenoviruses (ADVs) have been demonstrated in patients with myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy.7–9 In patients in whom myocarditis presented clinically as acute myocardial infarction, active or borderline myocarditis were diagnosed in various percentages, depending on the time interval of biopsy after acute onset of the disease, whereas virus analysis was either not performed or resulted in low evidence of virus genomes.2–6

The aim of the present study was to define the role of early endomyocardial biopsy in detecting virus genomes in patients with the clinical setting of acute myocardial infarction despite a normal coronary angiogram.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patients and Clinical Classification
Between April 1999 and February 2001, endomyocardial biopsies of 346 patients with clinically suspected myocarditis (n=242) or dilated cardiomyopathy (n=104) were investigated in our hospital. Among these patients, 24 patients with clinical signs and symptoms consistent with acute myocardial infarction underwent right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy within 6.7 days (95% confidence interval, 1.8 to 11.5 days) after onset of symptoms, after angiographic identification of normal coronary anatomy and exclusion of other possible causes of clinical symptoms (ie, valvular and hypertensive heart disease or systemic diseases). The initial diagnosis of clinically suspected acute myocarditis was based on abrupt onset of complaints, such as angina, together with newly developed ECG changes (ST-segment elevation or T inversion) and simultaneous detection of a serum marker of myocardial injury (creatine kinase/creatine kinase-MB or troponin T). Serum markers of myocardial injury were an elevated creatine kinase with an activity >80 U/L, an elevated creatine kinase-MB >8%, and/or a troponin T serum level of >=0.2 ng/mL.

Endomyocardial Biopsy and Right-Heart Catheterization
After written informed consent, 8 endomyocardial biopsies were obtained from the right side of the ventricular septum of each patient with a flexible bioptome (Westmed, Germany) via the femoral vein approach. Two biopsies were used for the histological evaluation according to the Dallas criteria and immunohistochemistry,10 respectively, whereas the remaining 4 biopsies were subjected to DNA and RNA extraction for the amplification of viral genomes.

After the biopsy specimens were obtained, the patients underwent right heart catheterization. Right atrial, right ventricular, pulmonary arterial, pulmonary-capillary wedge pressures, and cardiac index calculated by thermodilution technique were recorded. Standard 2-dimensional and M-mode echocardiography were performed at the time of biopsy in all patients.

Etiologic Investigations: Detection of Viral Genomes and Direct DNA-Sequencing of PVB19 Genomes
DNA and RNA were extracted simultaneously from frozen heart muscle tissue probes. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)/reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR was performed for the detection of EVs (including coxsackieviruses and echoviruses), ADVs, parvovirus B19 (PVB19), human cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr-virus, Chlamydia pneumoniae, influenza virus A and B, and Borrelia burgdorferi, as described.8,11 As a control for successful extraction of nucleic acids, primer sequences were chosen from the sequence of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene.

Sequence analysis of PVB19 PCR fragments were performed by automatic ABI Prism 310 Genetic Analyzer and BigDye Cycle Sequencing Kit according to manufacturer instructions (Applied Biosystems).12 The PVB3-primer (5'-GCTAACTCTGTAACTTG-TAC-3') was used for cycle sequencing. The sequences obtained were matched with the National Center for Biotechnology Information GenBank and compared with a recently described PVB19 genome (accession No. U3850913).

Serological Investigations
Serum titers of IgM antibodies for coxsackievirus B1 were increased in only one patient (1:128), whereas all other patients had low IgG titers for various virus species (eg, EVs, ADVs, cytomegalovirus, influenza virus, Epstein-Barr virus). Because PVB19 myocarditis had not been expected in the beginning of the study, PVB19 viral antibody titers had not been serially evaluated at the initial presentation of the patients. At follow-up, serological analyses (remcomBlot Parvovirus-B19-IgG, Mikrogen), however, revealed positive PVB19 IgG titers for 9 of 12 PVB19-positive and for 2 PVB19-negative patients. Two PVB19-negative patients and 2 EV-positive patients had a negative PVB19 serology (Table 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Ejection Fraction and Ventricular Diameters of Virus-Positive Patients at Baseline (n=17) and Follow-Up (n=14) Biopsy

Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using JMP Statistical Discovery Software 3.1.6 (SAS Institute). Results are expressed as mean±SD, unless stated otherwise. Nonparametric tests were used for non-normally distributed variables. Qualitative data were compared by {chi}2 test. A 2-sided value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Clinical Presentation
The study group comprised 21 men and 3 women (mean age, 39.5±15.4 years; range, 18 to 70 years). Seven patients (29%) were febrile at the time of admission, 14 patients had an antecedent upper respiratory tract infection 18 days (median) (95% confidence interval, 5.1 to 31 days) preceding the onset of cardiac symptoms, 8 patients had coronary risk factors (smoking), and 2 patients had a family history of cardiomyopathy. All patients admitted to our hospital presented with acute onset of nonpleuritic precordial chest pain within 24 hours of presentation, suggestive of acute myocardial infarction. Baseline clinical characteristics of all patients are given in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Demographic Data of Patients at Admission Clinically Presenting With Acute Myocardial Infarction

At the time of presentation, observed electrocardiographic changes included ST-segment elevation in 20 patients (anterior precordial leads, 8 patients; inferior, 12 patients) and T-wave inversion in 4 patients (anterior, 2; inferior, 2) but no ST-segment depression or pathological Q waves. None of the patients had supraventricular or ventricular extra beats or tachycardia or electrocardiographic conductance abnormalities at presentation or during hospitalization.

Baseline peak creatine kinase and MB isoenzyme fraction were increased to 342±241 U/mL (range, 104 to 962) and 32±20 U/mL (range, 10 to 86) (n=22) and normalized within 60 hours in all but one patient. Mean troponin T (normal <0.05 ng/mL) was increased to 7.5±15.0 ng/mL and C-reactive protein (normal <6 mg/dL) to 91±98 mg/mL (n=16), respectively.

Biplane left ventricular angiography revealed normal wall motion in 6 patients, global left ventricular hypokinesia in 14, and segmental hypokinesia in 4. The mean ejection fraction (EF) was 62.3±15.9%, and it was below 45% in only 3 of the patients. Cardiac index was normal in 18 patients and below 2.6 l per min/m2 in 3 (mean 3.4±1.3 l per min/m2, range 1.7 to 6.9 l per min/m2). Mean pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary wedge pressure were increased >14 mm Hg and 12 mm Hg in 3 patients, respectively. Wall motion abnormalities persisted during time of hospitalization in all 18 patients initially presenting with regional and global hypokinesia of the left ventricle in angiography and was associated with persisting ventricular dilatation in only one patient. Three patients had a pericardial effusion. Hemodynamic and echocardiographic data are summarized in Table 1.

After admission, the initial episode of chest pain ceased within 1 to 24 hours in 12 patients, but 12 patients continued to have recurrent episodes of chest pain despite therapy directed at reversing ischemia. Episodes of chest pain persisted on discharge in these patients. Although all patients had normal coronary arteries on angiography, coronary artery spasms could be induced in 6 of 9 patients who underwent a challenge test with the vasoconstrictor ergonovine. Four of the 6 patients in whom coronary artery spasm could be induced and who complained of recurrent episodes of angina were PVB19 positive in the PCR analysis.

Histology, Immunohistology, and PCR Analysis
The data on endomyocardial biopsy specimens are summarized in Table 2. One EV-positive patient had active myocarditis according to the Dallas Criteria. In the remaining 23 patients, neither active nor borderline myocarditis was present. Immunohistochemically, numbers of infiltrating CD3-positive T lymphocytes and macrophages (median) were 5.0 and 3.0 cells/mm2, respectively. Numbers of CD3-positive lymphocytes were not statistically different between virus-positive (n=17) and virus-negative (n=7) patients (1.4 versus 5.0 cells/mm2; P=0.19), whereas macrophages were increased in the virus-positive cohort of patients (2.1 versus 3.9 cells/mm2; P=0.04).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Histological, Immunohistological, and Molecular Biological (PCR) Findings in Endomyocardial Biopsies Obtained 6.7 Days After Onset of the Disease (range, 1.7 to 11.5 days) in Patients With the Clinical Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction

PCR amplification of parvoviral genomes occurred in cardiac tissue specimen from 12 patients (50%). Enteroviral RNA and adenoviral DNA were detected in 3 and 2 patients, respectively. Seven patients (30%) were negative in the PCR analysis. Representative gel electrophoresis results of PVB19 detection are summarized in the Figure (A). All PCR fragments were sequenced and confirmed the positive PVB19 nested-PCR results (Figure, B). Sequence analysis of PVB19 revealed randomly distributed point mutations in the VP1/2 region of the PVB19 isolates. In view of quality control, it is noteworthy that the PVB19 isolates showed sequence differences when compared with each other. Therefore, contaminations with PVB19 of the patient’s samples that may especially occur during nested PCR methods could be excluded. Interestingly, mutational hot spot-like regions that appeared in the analyzed sequences may be due to different PVB19 genotypes described previously14 (Figure, B). However, the presence of different genotype has to be elucidated in more detail. These sequence variations may be due to different PVB19 genotypes as discussed previously.14,15



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
A, Detection of PVB19 genomic DNA in endomyocardial biopsies by nested PCR. PCR was performed using PVB19-VP1/2-specific primers generating a 173-bp PVB19-VP2 fragment. PVB19-specific DNA fragments are shown for 12 of 14 patients (lanes 3 to 15). Note that no PVB19 DNA was amplified from patients CD and HA (lanes 11 and 14). In these lanes and in the negative control (lane 2), only primers are visible. PCR products were separated on 1.8% agarose gels and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. Figure represents a composite of individual routine agarose gels. A PhiX174 BsuRI DNA marker is seen in lane 1. B, PVB19 sequences of virus-positive patients were aligned with reference PVB19 sequences13 (accession No. U38509). Sequence homologies are denoted as dots; point mutations are shown in letters. Ruler on top was numbered according to the VP1 sequences (VP1 ATG=1).

Follow-Up
Control biopsies were available from 11 of 17 initially virus-positive patients (EV 3, ADV 2, PVB19 6). Although PVB19 persisted in all 6 patients, enteroviral and adenoviral genomes were cleared from the myocardium in one patient.

During a mean echocardiographic follow-up period of 7.4 months, regional and global wall motion abnormalities persisted in patients who developed virus persistence (n=9), despite medication with ACE inhibitors and diuretics. Left ventricular end-diastolic diameters of these patients increased in tendency, whereas the increase of end-systolic diameters was statistically significant (P<0.02) (Table 3). In the subgroup of patients with PVB19 persistence (n=6), EF decreased from 70.4±9.6% to 60.8±13.5% (P<0.02). EF improved in one patient who cleared enteroviral RNA from the myocardium. In the 2 patients developing EV persistence, EF decreased from 81% to 69% and from 80% to 65%, respectively (Table 4). One of the 2 ADV-positive patients developed virus persistence, whereas the other cleared adenoviral DNA from the myocardium (Table 4). In virus-negative patients, global hypokinesia persisted in one patient and resolved in another. Wall motion remained unaffected in the other 5 patients (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Echocardiographic Data (Mean±SD) of 9 Patients Who Developed Virus Persistence


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
All 24 patients presented with abrupt onset of angina and variable degrees of wall motion abnormalities, mimicking acute myocardial infarction. Clinical symptoms, ECG abnormalities, and creatine kinase or troponin T elevations, suggestive of myocardial injury, were the reason for immediate coronary angiography that demonstrated normal coronary anatomy in all patients. One important differential diagnosis to be taken into consideration in this clinical setting is acute myocarditis, which neither exclusively afflicts younger people nor has to be associated with a typical history of antecedent viral illness. Thus, after exclusion of coronary artery disease, clinical presentation of the patients led to the consideration of an acute infectious myocardial process, which is the characteristic indication for endomyocardial biopsy in the search for active myocarditis.2–6

Recently, the application of molecular technology to the clinical diagnosis of infectious disease has confirmed viral genomic persistence in myocardial tissues in a variable percentage of patients with myocarditis.7–9,16,17–20 However, reported frequencies of cardiotropic viruses in patients with acute myocarditis and histological or clinical signs of myocardial injury appear to be low.3,6,21 Spontaneous clearance of the viral infection during this early stage of the disease may be one explanation for the low virus frequency detected in these patients. On the other hand, other viruses that have not been taken into consideration in the diagnostic concepts in the past might be responsible for the acute myocardial injury of the early disease.

PVB19 is typically linked with the clinically presentation of erythema infectiosum (Fifth disease), hydrops fetalis, and fetal death, or transient aplastic crisis in patients with various forms of anemia. Besides the well-established enteroviral and adenoviral origin of myocarditis, a growing number of case reports show the association between PVB19 infection and myocarditis,11,22–25 various vasculitis syndromes in children,26 and fulminant hepatitis or meningoencephalitis.27,28 In addition, a role of PVB19 in cardiac allograft rejection has been suggested at the onset of acute rejection after heart transplantation.29,30 As of now, the frequency and clinical course of PVB19 in adults has not been investigated systematically.

In the present study, we analyzed the potential role of PVB19 in the clinical setting of acute myocarditis, in addition to EV and ADV infections. PCR analysis demonstrated the presence of virus genomes in 71% of the patients. PVB19 was the most frequent pathogen, whereas enteroviral and adenoviral genomes were detected in 3 and 2 of 24 consecutive patients, respectively. Histological and immunohistological analysis excluded lymphocytic infiltration in the majority of patients. These findings indicate that, in the absence of myocardial lymphocytic infiltration, PVB19 may represent a frequent and hitherto not considered pathogen in addition to enteroviral and adenoviral infections of the myocardium in patients in the clinical setting of acute viral-induced heart disease.

Most previous studies in patients with acute myocarditis have analyzed endomyocardial biopsy specimens according to the histological Dallas classification. Active or borderline myocarditis was diagnosed in various percentages depending on the time interval of biopsy after acute onset of the disease.4,6,31 In PVB19-positive patients, the situation appears to be different to that of EV-induced myocarditis. All biopsies but one were negative in the histological analysis, revealing no histological signs of myocarditis in 23 of 24 patients. In the immunohistochemical analysis, the majority of patients (21 of 24) presented with low-grade lymphocytic inflammation. Lymphocyte numbers, which were <10 cells/mm2, did not discriminate between different viruses or virus-positive and virus-negative patients, respectively. Macrophages, on the other hand, were increased in virus-positive biopsies. Thus, acute onset of symptoms and myocardial damage may be caused by different mechanisms, depending on the involved virus species. The lack of substantial lymphocytic inflammation in our patients with virally induced heart disease may indicate an inefficient immune response against the viral infections, preventing effective virus clearance. Alternatively, it may point to macrophage-dependent pathomechanisms different from those of lymphocytic myocarditis. It cannot be ruled out, however, that the timing of the biopsy was too early or too late to detect possible transient infiltration of the myocardium.

At least for ADVs and EVs, serology does not correlate with local virus infection of the myocardium, and therefore, absence or presence of serum antibodies does not allow any conclusion about infection of the heart by those viruses. On the other hand, it cannot be excluded that latent persistence of PVB19 genomes may last for years without causing damage to the host, until hitherto-unknown factors induce transcriptional activity of the PVB19 genomes, resulting in an acute symptomatic disease as described in this study.

Twelve patients experienced prolonged or recurrent episodes of chest pain during their hospital course and after dismissal despite antiischemic treatment. Coronary spasms could be induced in a challenge test in a subset of these patients.

In addition to proliferating erythroid precursor cells, endothelial cells have been recognized as targets for PVB19 infection if they express blood group P antigen, which serves as a cellular receptor for this virus.32 Because endothelial cells but not cardiac myocytes represent the PVB19-specific target cells in PVB19-associated myocarditis,11 initial PVB19 infection of endothelial cells of small coronary arteries and venules may cause endothelial dysfunction, which might explain the persistence of anginal symptoms as well as electrocardiographic and laboratory findings consistent with myocardial injury.

Follow-up of a subgroup of PVB19-positive patients revealed that persistence of virus genomes may be associated with progression of left ventricular dysfunction. This observation is in accordance with data from a treatment study of EV-caused left ventricular dysfunction, where interferon-ß was found to be effective with regard to virus clearance and improvement of ventricular function, whereas ventricular dysfunction did not improve in patients with enteroviral persistence.33

The small series of PVB19-positive patients seems to confirm that PVB19 infection of the myocardium is a hitherto infrequently considered pathogen in adults, which may masquerade as acute myocardial infarction. Because PVB19 infection may persist and be associated with progression of left ventricular dysfunction clinically diagnosed as dilated cardiomyopathy, routine molecular biological methods should be extended to this virus in the virological diagnosis of patients with myocarditis and particularly idiopathic left ventricular dysfunction. Endothelial dysfunction may be caused by early PVB19 infection of vascular endothelial cells, thus being a reason for unexplained angina pectoris in patients in the absence of coronary heart disease.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Dec GW Jr, Palacios IF, Fallon JT, et al. Active myocarditis in the spectrum of acute dilated cardiomyopathies: clinical features, histologic correlates, and clinical outcome. N Engl J Med. 1985; 312: 885–890.[Abstract]

2. Miklozek CL, Crumpacker CS, Royal HD, et al. Myocarditis presenting as acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1988; 115: 768–776.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Dec GW, Waldman H, Southern J, et al. Viral myocarditis mimicking acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992; 20: 85–89.[Abstract]

4. Narula J, Khaw BA, Dec GW, et al. Brief report: recognition of acute myocarditis masquerading as acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1993; 328: 100–104.[Free Full Text]

5. Folger GM, Ahmed Eltohami E, Ahmed Hajar H. Acute myocardial-infarction-like findings with myocarditis in infancy: a case report. Angiology. 1994; 45: 737–741.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Angelini A, Calzolari V, Calabrese F, et al. Myocarditis mimicking acute myocardial infarction: role of endomyocardial biopsy in the differential diagnosis. Heart. 2000; 84: 245–250.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Baboonian C, Treasure T. Meta-analysis of the association of enteroviruses with human heart disease. Heart. 1997; 78: 539–543.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Pauschinger M, Bowles NE, Fuentes-Garcia FJ, et al. Detection of adenoviral genome in the myocardium of adult patients with idiopathic left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation. 1999; 99: 1348–1354.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Kandolf R, Sauter M, Aepinus C, et al. Mechanisms and consequences of enterovirus persistence in cardiac myocytes and cells of the immune system. Virus Res. 1999; 62: 149–158.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Noutsias M, Seeberg B, Schultheiss HP, et al. Expression of cell adhesion molecules in dilated cardiomyopathy: evidence for endothelial activation in inflammatory cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1999; 99: 2124–2131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Bueltmann BD, Klingel K, Soltar K, et al. Fatal parvovirus B19-associated myocarditis clinically mimicking ischemic heart disease: an endothelial cell-mediated disease. Human Pathol. 2002; 34: 92–95.

12. Smith LM, Sanders JZ, Kaiser RJ, et al. Fluorescence detection in automated DNA sequence analysis. Nature. 1986; 321: 674–679.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Erdman DD, Durigon EL, Wang QY, et al. Genetic diversity of human parvovirus B19: sequence analysis of the VP1/VP2 gene from multiple isolates. J Gen Virol. 1996; 77: 2767–2774.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Blundell MC, Beard C, Astell CR. In vitro identification of a B19 parvovirus promoter. Virology. 1987; 157: 534–538.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Johansen JN, Christensen LS, Zakrzewska K, et al. Typing of European strains of parvovirus B19 by restriction endonuclease analyses and sequencing: identification of evolutionary lineages and evidence of recombination of markers from different lineages. Virus Res. 1998; 53: 215–223.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Kandolf R, Hofschneider PH. Molecular cloning of the genome of a cardiotropic Coxsackie B3 virus: full-length reverse-transcribed recombinant cDNA generates infectious virus in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985; 82: 4818–4822.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Bowles NE, Richardson PJ, Olsen EG, et al. Detection of Coxsackie-B-virus-specific RNA sequences in myocardial biopsy samples from patients with myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy. Lancet. 1986; 1: 1120–1123.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Archard LC, Richardson PJ, Olsen EG, et al. The role of Coxsackie B viruses in the pathogenesis of myocarditis, dilated cardiomyopathy and inflammatory muscle disease. Biochem Soc Symp. 1987; 53: 51–62.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Jin O, Sole MJ, Butany JW, et al. Detection of enterovirus RNA in myocardial biopsies from patients with myocarditis and cardiomyopathy using gene amplification by polymerase chain reaction. Circulation. 1990; 82: 8–16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Pauschinger M, Doerner A, Kuehl U, et al. Enteroviral RNA replication in the myocardium of patients with left ventricular dysfunction and clinically suspected myocarditis. Circulation. 1999; 99: 889–895.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Angelini A, Crosato M, Boffa GM, et al. Active versus borderline myocarditis: clinicopathological correlates and prognostic implications. Heart. 2002; 87: 210–215.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Murry CE, Jerome KR, Reichenbach DD. Fatal parvovirus myocarditis in a 5-year-old girl. Hum Pathol. 2001; 32: 342–345.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Nigro G, Bastianon V, Colloridi V, et al. Human parvovirus B19 infection in infancy associated with acute and chronic lymphocytic myocarditis and high cytokine levels: report of 3 cases and review. Clin Infect Dis. 2000; 31: 65–9.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Orth T, Herr W, Spahn T, et al. Human parvovirus B19 infection associated with severe acute perimyocarditis in a 34-year-old man. Eur Heart J. 1997; 18: 524–525.[Free Full Text]

25. Chia JK, Jackson B. Myopericarditis due to parvovirus B19 in an adult. Clin Infect Dis. 1996; 23: 200–201.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Finkel TH, Torok TJ, Ferguson PJ, et al. Chronic parvovirus B19 infection and systemic necrotising vasculitis: opportunistic infection or aetiological agent? Lancet. 1994; 343: 1255–1258.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Sokal EM, Melchior M, Cornu C, et al. Acute parvovirus B19 infection associated with fulminant hepatitis of favourable prognosis in young children. Lancet. 1998; 352: 1739–1741.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Yoto Y, Kudoh T, Haseyama K, et al. Human parvovirus B19 and meningoencephalitis. Lancet. 2001; 358: 2168.Letter.

29. Heegaard ED, Eiskjaer H, Baandrup U, et al. Parvovirus B19 infection associated with myocarditis following adult cardiac transplantation. Scand J Infect Dis. 1998; 30: 607–610.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Schowengerdt KO, Ni J, Denfield SW, et al. Association of parvovirus B19 genome in children with myocarditis and cardiac allograft rejection: diagnosis using the polymerase chain reaction. Circulation. 1997; 96: 3549–3554.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Dec GW Jr, Waldman H, Southern J, et al. Viral myocarditis mimicking acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992; 20: 85–89.[Abstract]

32. Brown KE, Anderson SM, Young NS. Erythrocyte P antigen: cellular receptor for B19 parvovirus. Science. 1993; 262: 114–117.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Kühl U, Pauschinger M, Schwimmbeck PL, et al. Interferon-beta treatment eliminates cardiotropic viruses and improves left ventricular function in patients with myocardial persistence of viral genomes and left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation. 2003; 107: 2793–2798.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
H. Baccouche, H. Mahrholdt, G. Meinhardt, R. Merher, M. Voehringer, S. Hill, K. Klingel, R. Kandolf, U. Sechtem, and A. Yilmaz
Diagnostic synergy of non-invasive cardiovascular magnetic resonance and invasive endomyocardial biopsy in troponin-positive patients without coronary artery disease
Eur. Heart J., August 20, 2009; (2009) ehp328v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
M. Noutsias, S. Pankuweit, B. Maisch, D. Huzly, M. Enders, and S. Pollak
Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Parvovirus B19 Infection
J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 2009; 47(7): 2358 - 2359.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular MedicineHome page
O. M. Hess, W. McKenna, and H.-P. Schultheiss
CHAPTER 18 Myocardial Disease
ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, January 1, 2009; 2(1): med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
A Yilmaz, H Mahrholdt, A Athanasiadis, H Vogelsberg, G Meinhardt, M Voehringer, E-M Kispert, C Deluigi, H Baccouche, E Spodarev, et al.
Coronary vasospasm as the underlying cause for chest pain in patients with PVB19 myocarditis
Heart, November 1, 2008; 94(11): 1456 - 1463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. Ong, A. Athanasiadis, S. Hill, H. Vogelsberg, M. Voehringer, and U. Sechtem
Coronary Artery Spasm as a Frequent Cause of Acute Coronary Syndrome: The CASPAR (Coronary Artery Spasm in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome) Study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 12, 2008; 52(7): 523 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Yilmaz, K. Klingel, R. Kandolf, and U. Sechtem
A geographical mystery: do cardiotropic viruses respect national borders?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 2008; 52(1): 82 - 82.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. Andreoletti
Reply.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 2008; 52(1): 82 - 83.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Gutberlet, B. Spors, T. Thoma, H. Bertram, T. Denecke, R. Felix, M. Noutsias, H.-P. Schultheiss, and U. Kuhl
Suspected Chronic Myocarditis at Cardiac MR: Diagnostic Accuracy and Association with Immunohistologically Detected Inflammation and Viral Persistence
Radiology, February 1, 2008; 246(2): 401 - 409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Noutsias, U. Kuehl, D. Lassner, U. Gross, M. Pauschinger, H.-P. Schultheiss, and M. Gutberlet
Parvovirus B19-Associated Active Myocarditis With Biventricular Thrombi Results of Endomyocardial Biopsy Investigations and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Circulation, April 3, 2007; 115(13): e378 - e380.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
J.-i. Suzuki, M. Ogawa, H. Futamatsu, H. Kosuge, Y. M. Sagesaka, and M. Isobe
Tea catechins improve left ventricular dysfunction, suppress myocardial inflammation and fibrosis, and alter cytokine expression in rat autoimmune myocarditis
Eur J Heart Fail, February 1, 2007; 9(2): 152 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
A. Lupescu, C.-T. Bock, P. A. Lang, S. Aberle, H. Kaiser, R. Kandolf, and F. Lang
Phospholipase A2 Activity-Dependent Stimulation of Ca2+ Entry by Human Parvovirus B19 Capsid Protein VP1
J. Virol., November 15, 2006; 80(22): 11370 - 11380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. Mahrholdt, A. Wagner, C. C. Deluigi, E. Kispert, S. Hager, G. Meinhardt, H. Vogelsberg, P. Fritz, J. Dippon, C. -T. Bock, et al.
Presentation, Patterns of Myocardial Damage, and Clinical Course of Viral Myocarditis
Circulation, October 10, 2006; 114(15): 1581 - 1590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P.-Y. Levy, P.-E. Fournier, R. Charrel, D. Metras, G. Habib, and D. Raoult
Molecular analysis of pericardial fluid: a 7-year experience
Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2006; 27(16): 1942 - 1946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
S. Rutschow, J. Li, H.-P. Schultheiss, and M. Pauschinger
Myocardial proteases and matrix remodeling in inflammatory heart disease
Cardiovasc Res, February 15, 2006; 69(3): 646 - 656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
U. Sechtem and M. Vohringer
The clinical role of 'non-invasive' coronary angiography by multidetector spiral computed tomography: yet to be defined
Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2005; 26(19): 1942 - 1944.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
U. Kuhl, M. Pauschinger, B. Seeberg, D. Lassner, M. Noutsias, W. Poller, and H.-P. Schultheiss
Viral Persistence in the Myocardium Is Associated With Progressive Cardiac Dysfunction
Circulation, September 27, 2005; 112(13): 1965 - 1970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. Abdel-Aty, P. Boye, A. Zagrosek, R. Wassmuth, A. Kumar, D. Messroghli, P. Bock, R. Dietz, M. G. Friedrich, and J. Schulz-Menger
Diagnostic Performance of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Suspected Acute Myocarditis: Comparison of Different Approaches
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 7, 2005; 45(11): 1815 - 1822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. B. Vallbracht, P. L. Schwimmbeck, U. Kuhl, U. Rauch, B. Seeberg, and H.-P. Schultheiss
Differential Aspects of Endothelial Function of the Coronary Microcirculation Considering Myocardial Virus Persistence, Endothelial Activation, and Myocardial Leukocyte Infiltrates
Circulation, April 12, 2005; 111(14): 1784 - 1791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
U. Kuhl, M. Pauschinger, M. Noutsias, B. Seeberg, T. Bock, D. Lassner, W. Poller, R. Kandolf, and H.-P. Schultheiss
High Prevalence of Viral Genomes and Multiple Viral Infections in the Myocardium of Adults With "Idiopathic" Left Ventricular Dysfunction
Circulation, February 22, 2005; 111(7): 887 - 893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. Tschope, C.-T. Bock, M. Kasner, M. Noutsias, D. Westermann, P.-L. Schwimmbeck, M. Pauschinger, W.-C. Poller, U. Kuhl, R. Kandolf, et al.
High Prevalence of Cardiac Parvovirus B19 Infection in Patients With Isolated Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction
Circulation, February 22, 2005; 111(7): 879 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. B. Vallbracht, P. L. Schwimmbeck, U. Kuhl, B. Seeberg, and H.-P. Schultheiss
Endothelium-Dependent Flow-Mediated Vasodilation of Systemic Arteries Is Impaired in Patients With Myocardial Virus Persistence
Circulation, November 2, 2004; 110(18): 2938 - 2945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
B. D. Bultmann, K. Sotlar, K. Klingel, P. H. Pronovost, N. S. Young, and K. E. Brown
Parvovirus B19
N. Engl. J. Med., May 6, 2004; 350(19): 2006 - 2007.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Pankuweit, S. Lamparter, M. Schoppet, and B. Maisch
Parvovirus B19 Genome in Endomyocardial Biopsy Specimen
Circulation, April 13, 2004; 109(14): e179 - e179.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
108/8/945    most recent
01.CIR.0000085168.02782.2Cv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kühl, U.
Right arrow Articles by Kandolf, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kühl, U.
Right arrow Articles by Kandolf, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pericardial disease
Right arrow Myocardial cardiomyopathy disease
Right arrow Other etiology