| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2003;108:257.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Brief Rapid Communications |
From Erasmus Medical Center, Thoraxcenter, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Correspondence to Prof P.W. Serruys, MD, PhD, Thoraxcenter, Bd-406, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015-GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail p.w.j.c.serruys{at}erasmusmc.nl
Received March 25, 2003; de novo received May 2, 2003; revision received June 3, 2003; accepted June 5, 2003.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results From 121 patients with coronary angiography obtained >30 days after SES implantation, restenosis (diameter stenosis >50%) was identified in 19 patients and 20 lesions (located at the proximal 5-mm segment in 30% or within the stent in 70%). Residual dissection after the procedure or balloon trauma outside the stent was identified in 83% of the proximal edge lesions. Lesions within the stent were focal, and stent discontinuity was identified in some lesions evaluated by intravascular ultrasound.
Conclusions Sirolimus-eluting stent edge restenosis is frequently associated with local trauma outside the stent. In-stent restenosis occurs as a localized lesion, commonly associated with a discontinuity in stent coverage. Local conditions instead of intrinsic drug-resistance to sirolimus are likely to play a major role in post-SES restenosis.
Key Words: restenosis stents angioplasty
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
See p 248
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Binary restenosis was defined by diameter stenosis >50% and classified as (1) in-stent, if inside the stent, or (2) edge restenosis, if located within the 5-mm segments distal or proximal to the stent margins. Restenosis at an ostial location was classified as in-stent, unless clearly located outside the limits of the SES, in which case it was classified as edge restenosis. Discrete variables were presented as counts and percentages. Continuous variables were presented as mean±SD and compared by Students t test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
7 months from the index procedure. A coronary angiogram performed >30 days after the angioplasty was obtained in 121 patients (221 lesions). Among these, post-SES restenosis was identified in 19 patients and 20 lesions (Table). IVUS was available at follow-up for 11 patients with restenosis (58%). In total, 6 lesions (30%) were located at the proximal edge and 14 were in-stent (70%). Local injury outside the stent was observed in 5 cases of edge restenosis (83%), as evidenced by the presence of angiographic or IVUS residual dissection after the procedure (patients 1, 3, and 4), by balloon dilation at a nonstented area in a patient with extensive manipulation before and after implantation of 4 stents for acute occlusion (patient 2), or by balloon postdilation outside the stent (patient 5).
|
Among the 14 in-stent lesions, 12 (86%) were focal (restenosis length <10 mm)4 and presented a peculiar angiographic pattern manifested by a very localized stenotic site bordered by segments without evidence of lumen compromise (Figure, A). Stenosis length decreased from 19.1±19.1 mm at baseline to 7.6±5.6 mm at follow-up (P=0.046). The ratio of restenosis length/stent length was 0.3±0.2. A gap between stents or stent fracture at the site of the restenosis was detected by IVUS in 4 patients at follow-up. A gap was diagnosed by the absence of stent struts in at least one IVUS cross section in the examination of the region between two stents (patients 13, 18, and 19); a stent fracture was diagnosed by the nonvisualization of struts within the stent (patients 15 and 18). One patient presented both stent gap and fracture in separate sites (patient 18). In this patient, no IVUS was performed at the index procedure (IVUS was done only at follow-up). In the other patient with stent fracture (patient 15), the stent discontinuity was not evident after the procedure, being only detected at the follow-up. In all cases, the stent gap or fracture could not be noticed angiographically and measured <1 mm in length by IVUS (Figure, A).
|
Among the 6 ostial lesions (30%), the ostium was not covered by the stent at angiographic inspection in 1 case (classified as proximal edge restenosis). The remaining 5 lesions appeared to be fully covered by the stent on angiography. IVUS was available for only one of these cases. In this patient, although angiographically unnoticed, a short area at the ostium was observed to be uncovered by SES (Figure, B). Among the 6 ostial lesions, 4 were located in the side branch of bifurcation stenting treatment, all treated with "T" stent technique (stent in the side branch implanted with its proximal border located at the ostium of the branch; stent in the main vessel implanted encompassing the side branch ostium, thereby creating a "T" configuration).5
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
90% of patients with in-stent restenosis after SES implantation, the lesion was very localized and bordered by segments with no evidence of neointima. The effect of the drug in the nonrestenotic portions indicates that an intrinsic resistance to sirolimus was unlikely in most of our patients. Among lesions evaluated by IVUS, stent discontinuity was identified in 36% of cases (and in 50% of restenosis located inside the stent), suggesting that a decrease in local drug availability may have contributed to the development of restenosis in these cases. Accordingly, our findings suggest that incomplete lesion coverage by the SES also may influence the occurrence of restenosis at the stent borders and at ostial sites. We may speculate that although no clinical data are currently available, techniques that ensure complete vessel scaffolding could constitute an alternative for SES implantation at bifurcations.6 Edge restenosis occurred more frequently in the proximal than in the distal stent border. Whether this finding is associated with a more effective drug effect in the outflow stent border remains to be clarified. In addition, 37% of our cases were diabetics. It may be hypothesized that the presence of diabetes mellitus may lead to a higher predisposition to post-SES restenosis. The current study presents several limitations. Angiographic follow-up was available for complex patients or for those with recurrent symptoms, therefore precluding an evaluation of the total restenosis rate for the global treated population. Moreover, the lack of IVUS limits a more detailed description of the mechanisms involved in the occurrence of post-SES restenosis in some patients.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Degertekin M, Regar E, Tanabe K, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stent for treatment of complex in-stent restenosis: the first clinical experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41: 184189.
3. Lemos PA, Lee CH, Degertekin M, et al. Early Outcome after Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: insights from the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41: 20932099.
4. Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS, et al. Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome. Circulation. 1999; 100: 18721878.
5. Sheiban I, Albiero R, Marsico F, et al. Immediate and long-term results of "T" stenting for bifurcation coronary lesions. Am J Cardiol. 2000; 85: 11411144,A9.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Chevalier B, Glatt B, Royer T, et al. Placement of coronary stents in bifurcation lesions by the "culotte" technique. Am J Cardiol. 1998; 82: 943949.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
Related Article:
Circulation 2003 108: 248-249.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X. Liu, H. Doi, A. Maehara, G. S. Mintz, J. de Ribamar Costa Jr, K. Sano, G. Weisz, G. D. Dangas, A. J. Lansky, E. M. Kreps, et al. A Volumetric Intravascular Ultrasound Comparison of Early Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis Versus Restenosis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., May 1, 2009; 2(5): 428 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Qiangjun Cai, K. Skelding, A. Armstrong Jr, D. Desai, G. C. Wood, and J. Blankenship Predictors of Long-Term Major Adverse Cardiac Events and Clinical Restenosis Following Elective Percutaneous Coronary Stenting Angiology, April 1, 2009; 60(2): 141 - 147. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. B. Lim, G. Hur, S. Y. Kim, Y. H. Kim, S. U. Kwon, W. R. Lee, and S. J. Cha Coronary Stent Fracture: Detection with 64-Section Multidetector CT Angiography in Patients and in Vitro Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 810 - 819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. O. Jensen, M. Maeng, P. Thayssen, E. H. Christiansen, K. N. Hansen, A. Galloe, H. Kelbaek, J. F. Lassen, and L. Thuesen Neointimal hyperplasia after sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in diabetic patients: The Randomized Diabetes and Drug-Eluting Stent (DiabeDES) Intravascular Ultrasound Trial Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2008; 29(22): 2733 - 2741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M.M. van Beusekom, F. Saia, J. D. Zindler, P. A. Lemos, S. L. S.-t. Hoor, M. A.H. van Leeuwen, P. J. de Feijter, P. W. Serruys, and W. J. van der Giessen Drug-eluting stents show delayed healing: paclitaxel more pronounced than sirolimus Eur. Heart J., April 12, 2007; (2007) ehm064v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Corbett, J. Cosgrave, G. Melzi, R. Babic, G. G.L. Biondi-Zoccai, C. Godino, N. Morici, F. Airoldi, I. Michev, M. Montorfano, et al. Patterns of restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation: insights from a contemporary and comparative analysis of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2006; 27(19): 2330 - 2337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Mintz and N. J. Weissman Intravascular Ultrasound in the Drug-Eluting Stent Era J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): 421 - 429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Pugliese, F. Cademartiri, C. van Mieghem, W. B. Meijboom, P. Malagutti, N. R. A. Mollet, C. Martinoli, P. J. de Feyter, and G. P. Krestin Multidetector CT for visualization of coronary stents. RadioGraphics, May 1, 2006; 26(3): 887 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Raja Drug-Eluting Stents and the Future of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Facts and Fiction Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2006; 81(3): 1162 - 1171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Alfonso Residual coronary dissections after drug-eluting stenting: the good, the bad, and the ugly Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2006; 27(5): 503 - 505. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. C.N. Rensen, K. W. van Dijk, and L. M. Havekes Apolipoprotein AV: Low Concentration, High Impact Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, December 1, 2005; 25(12): 2445 - 2447. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E Iofina, P W Radke, P Skurzewski, P K Haager, R Blindt, K-C Koch, P Hanrath, J vom Dahl, and R Hoffmann Superiority of sirolimus eluting stent compared with intracoronary {beta} radiation for treatment of in-stent restenosis: a matched comparison Heart, December 1, 2005; 91(12): 1584 - 1589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Thiele, S. Oettel, S. Jacobs, R. Hambrecht, P. Sick, J. F. Gummert, F. W. Mohr, G. Schuler, and V. Falk Comparison of Bare-Metal Stenting With Minimally Invasive Bypass Surgery for Stenosis of the Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery: A 5-Year Follow-Up Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22): 3445 - 3450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A E Rodriguez, M Rodriguez Alemparte, C F Vigo, C Fernandez Pereira, C Llaurado, D Vetcher, A Pocovi, and J Ambrose Role of oral rapamycin to prevent restenosis in patients with de novo lesions undergoing coronary stenting: results of the Argentina single centre study (ORAR trial) Heart, November 1, 2005; 91(11): 1433 - 1437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-B. Seung, Y.-H. Kim, D.-W. Park, B.-K. Lee, C. W. Lee, M.-K. Hong, P.-J. Kim, W.-S. Chung, S.-J. Tahk, S.-W. Park, et al. Effectiveness of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation for the Treatment of Ostial Left Anterior Descending Artery Stenosis With Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 6, 2005; 46(5): 787 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Sousa, M. A. Costa, A. Abizaid, F. Feres, A. C. Seixas, L. F. Tanajura, L. A. Mattos, R. Falotico, J. Jaeger, J. J. Popma, et al. Four-Year Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasound Follow-Up of Patients Treated With Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Circulation, May 10, 2005; 111(18): 2326 - 2329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Costa and D. I. Simon Molecular Basis of Restenosis and Drug-Eluting Stents Circulation, May 3, 2005; 111(17): 2257 - 2273. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Drenth, F. Zijlstra, P. W. Boonstra, N. Sawhney, P. S. Teirstein, J. W. Moses, M. B. Leon, R. E. Kuntz, J. J. Popma, W. Bachinsky, et al. Letter Regarding Article by Sawhney et al, "Treatment of Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Disease With Sirolimus-Eluting Stents" * Response Circulation, April 26, 2005; 111(16): e265 - e266. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Andrassy, D. Belov, E. Harja, Y. S. Zou, M. Leitges, H. A. Katus, P. P. Nawroth, S. D. Yan, A. M. Schmidt, and S.-F. Yan Central Role of PKC{beta} in Neointimal Expansion Triggered by Acute Arterial Injury Circ. Res., March 4, 2005; 96(4): 476 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Iakovou, T. Schmidt, L. Ge, G. M. Sangiorgi, G. Stankovic, F. Airoldi, A. Chieffo, M. Montorfano, M. Carlino, I. Michev, et al. Angiographic patterns of restenosis after paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 1, 2005; 45(5): 805 - 806. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Fukui, S. Takanashi, and Y. Hosoda Coronary Endarterectomy and Stent Removal in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 79(2): 558 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. C H John Cardiac revascularization--a need for independent decision-makers J R Soc Med, January 1, 2005; 98(1): 1 - 2. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Takebayashi, G. S. Mintz, S. G. Carlier, Y. Kobayashi, K. Fujii, T. Yasuda, R. A. Costa, I. Moussa, G. D. Dangas, R. Mehran, et al. Nonuniform Strut Distribution Correlates With More Neointimal Hyperplasia After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation Circulation, November 30, 2004; 110(22): 3430 - 3434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Lemos, N. Mercado, R. T. van Domburg, R. E. Kuntz, W. W. O'Neill, and P. W. Serruys Comparison of Late Luminal Loss Response Pattern After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation or Conventional Stenting Circulation, November 16, 2004; 110(20): 3199 - 3205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Murphy, A. J. Bryan, and G. D. Angelini Hybrid Coronary Revascularization in the Era of Drug-Eluting Stents Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2004; 78(5): 1861 - 1867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F Saia, P A Lemos, C A Arampatzis, A Hoye, M Degertekin, K Tanabe, G Sianos, P C Smits, W J van der Giessen, P J de Feyter, et al. Routine sirolimus eluting stent implantation for unselected in-stent restenosis: insights from the rapamycin eluting stent evaluated at Rotterdam cardiology hospital (RESEARCH) registry Heart, October 1, 2004; 90(10): 1183 - 1188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G W Mikhail, F Airoldi, D Tavano, A Chieffo, R Rogacka, M Carlino, M Montorfano, G Sangiorgi, N Corvaja, I Michev, et al. The use of drug eluting stents in single and multivessel disease: results from a single centre experience Heart, September 1, 2004; 90(9): 990 - 994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Halkin, S Carlier, and M B Leon Late incomplete lesion coverage following Cypher stent deployment for diffuse right coronary artery stenosis Heart, August 1, 2004; 90(8): e45 - e45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Naka, L. G. Bucciarelli, T. Wendt, L. K. Lee, L. L. Rong, R. Ramasamy, S. F. Yan, and A. M. Schmidt RAGE Axis: Animal Models and Novel Insights Into the Vascular Complications of Diabetes Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, August 1, 2004; 24(8): 1342 - 1349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Lemos, C. A.G. van Mieghem, C. A. Arampatzis, A. Hoye, A. T.L. Ong, E. McFadden, G. Sianos, W. J. van der Giessen, P. J. de Feyter, R. T. van Domburg, et al. Post-Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Restenosis Treated With Repeat Percutaneous Intervention: Late Angiographic and Clinical Outcomes Circulation, June 1, 2004; 109(21): 2500 - 2502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Holmes Jr How Many Grails Do We Need? Circulation, May 11, 2004; 109(18): 2158 - 2159. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-F. Yan, R. Ramasamy, L. G Bucciarelli, T. Wendt, L. K Lee, B. I Hudson, D. M Stenr, E. Lalla, S. Du Yan, L. L. Rong, et al. RAGE and its ligands: a lasting memory in diabetic complications? Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, May 1, 2004; 1(1): 10 - 20. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. H Chong and J. W. Cheng Early Experiences and Clinical Implications of Restenosis and Drug-Eluting Stents: Part 2 Ann. Pharmacother., May 1, 2004; 38(5): 845 - 852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Orford, A. Lerman, and D. R. Holmes Routine intravascular ultrasound guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention: A critical reappraisal J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 21, 2004; 43(8): 1335 - 1342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Drenth, N. J.G.M. Veeger, J. G. Grandjean, M. A. Mariani, A. J. van Boven, and P. W. Boonstra Isolated high-grade lesion of the proximal LAD: a stent or off-pump LIMA? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2004; 25(4): 567 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Lemos, A. Hoye, D. Goedhart, C. A. Arampatzis, F. Saia, W. J. van der Giessen, E. McFadden, G. Sianos, P. C. Smits, S. H. Hofma, et al. Clinical, Angiographic, and Procedural Predictors of Angiographic Restenosis After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in Complex Patients: An Evaluation From the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) Study Circulation, March 23, 2004; 109(11): 1366 - 1370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. McKenna Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis Rates? Circulation, March 9, 2004; 109 (9): e154 - e154. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Fujii, G. S. Mintz, Y. Kobayashi, S. G. Carlier, H. Takebayashi, T. Yasuda, I. Moussa, G. Dangas, R. Mehran, A. J. Lansky, et al. Contribution of Stent Underexpansion to Recurrence After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation for In-Stent Restenosis Circulation, March 9, 2004; 109(9): 1085 - 1088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. W. O'Neill and S. R. Dixon The year in interventional cardiology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 3, 2004; 43(5): 875 - 890. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Lemos, P. W. Serruys, R. T. van Domburg, F. Saia, C. A. Arampatzis, A. Hoye, M. Degertekin, K. Tanabe, J. Daemen, T. K.K. Liu, et al. Unrestricted Utilization of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Compared With Conventional Bare Stent Implantation in the "Real World": The Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) Registry Circulation, January 20, 2004; 109(2): 190 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Marks Sirolimus for the Prevention of In-Stent Restenosis in a Coronary Artery N. Engl. J. Med., October 2, 2003; 349(14): 1307 - 1309. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. King III Restenosis: The Mouse That Roared Circulation, July 22, 2003; 108(3): 248 - 249. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |