| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2003;108:2964.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Brief Rapid Communications |
From the Departments of Cardiovascular Medicine (W.H.W.T., R.C.S., J.B.Y., G.S.F.), Medicine (J.P.G., M.J.L.), and Clinical Pathology (F.V.L.), Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Correspondence to W.H. Wilson Tang, MD, 9500 Euclid Ave, Desk F25, Cleveland, OH 44195. E-mail tangw{at}ccf.org
Received May 5, 2003; de novo received August 13, 2003; revision received October 24, 2003; accepted October 28, 2003.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results We followed up 558 consecutive ambulatory patients with chronic, stable systolic HF (left ventricular ejection fraction <50%) treated at a specialized outpatient HF clinic between November 2001 and February 2003. Retrospective chart review was performed to determine clinical and functional data at the time of BNP testing (Biosite Triage). The clinical characteristics of patients with plasma BNP levels <100 pg/mL and those with
100 pg/mL were compared. In our cohort, 60 patients were considered asymptomatic, and their plasma BNP levels ranged from 5 to 572 pg/mL (median, 147 pg/mL). Of the remaining 498 symptomatic (NYHA functional class IIIII) patients, 106 (21.3%) had plasma BNP levels in the "normal" diagnostic range (<100 pg/mL). Patients in this "normal BNP" subgroup were more likely to be younger, to be female, to have nonischemic pathogenesis, and to have better-preserved cardiac and renal function and less likely to have atrial fibrillation.
Conclusions In the ambulatory care setting, both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with chronic, stable systolic HF may present with a wide range of plasma BNP levels. In a subset of symptomatic patients (up to 21% in our cohort), plasma BNP levels are below what would be considered "diagnostic" (<100 pg/mL).
Key Words: natriuretic peptides heart failure systole
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
See p 2950
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study Design
This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study approved by our Institutional Review Board. We performed standardized chart review from paper and electronic medical records to extract demographic, clinical, and echocardiographic data documented within 6 months of BNP testing. As part of routine care, all patients underwent diagnostic evaluation to establish the diagnosis of HF and to determine the severity (by echocardiogram and clinical history) and the underlying pathogenesis (by stress testing with perfusion imaging and/or coronary angiography) of HF. On the basis of these available data, the diagnosis of HF and the underlying pathogenesis were established by an HF specialist who was caring for the patient and was blinded to the study. In most cases, the HF specialist documented the NYHA functional class in the clinical notes. For patients without NYHA documentation in the clinical notes, 2 collaborating investigators of the study who were blinded to the results (J.P.G., M.J.L.) retrospectively reviewed the description of functional status from the clinical notes at the time of BNP testing to assign the corresponding NYHA class. All plasma BNP assays were performed on site during outpatient clinic visits by use of the point-of-care Biosite Triage Assay (Biosite Diagnostics Corp). If multiple tests were performed on the same day, the highest BNP value was recorded. A plasma BNP level of <100 pg/mL was considered to be in the "normal" diagnostic range.1 All patients were treated according to our HF clinical management guidelines.5
Statistical Analyses
We performed standard univariate comparisons of patient characteristics between patients with normal and elevated plasma BNP levels. We then performed forward stepwise multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors for normal plasma BNP levels in symptomatic patients with HF using SPSS version 10.0. Variables included in the analysis were age, sex, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, HF pathogenesis, renal insufficiency, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, atrial fibrillation, and NYHA functional class.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Patients presenting with "normal" plasma BNP levels were more likely to be younger, to be female, and to have a nonischemic pathogenesis, better-preserved cardiac and renal function, and less atrial fibrillation (Table 1). Treatment regimens were similar between the 2 groups. However, only age, cardiac and renal function, and HF pathogenesis were independent predictors for "normal" plasma BNP level (Table 2). Overall, patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy had lower mean plasma BNP levels than patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (267±378 versus 579±452 pg/mL, P<0.01), although the former had less atrial fibrillation (13% versus 26%, respectively) and renal dysfunction (8% versus 19%, respectively) despite similar echocardiographic and functional measurements.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
What are the potential mechanisms for relatively low BNP levels in a cohort of patients with symptomatic chronic stable systolic HF? Plasma BNP is considered a direct counterregulatory response to myocardial stress and increased left ventricular filling pressures in the failing myocardium.6 Significant reduction in plasma BNP levels has been observed after optimal therapy with diuretics and ACE inhibitors, which often reduce filling pressures. The reliable prognostic value of elevated plasma BNP in symptomatic systolic HF has been consistent in various clinical settings,7 and we believe that the prognostic value of plasma BNP in our study cohort will remain robust. It is therefore a logical deduction that patients with HF and relatively low plasma BNP levels may represent a subgroup of patients who simply respond well to optimal therapy.
If BNP generation were predominantly load-dependent with a constant relationship between intracardiac filling pressures and plasma BNP levels, one would postulate that the majority of asymptomatic (NYHA class I) patients with chronic HF would have low plasma BNP levels, and the majority of symptomatic patients may have elevated plasma BNP levels. Yet, our data indicate that the plasma BNP levels in all asymptomatic patients ranged from 5 to 572 pg/mL, whereas >20% of symptomatic patients had plasma BNP levels <100 pg/mL. This wide variability of plasma BNP levels in chronic stable systolic HF patients suggests that plasma BNP is a continuous and not a dichotomous variable. We believe that a better fundamental understanding of the mechanisms underlying this intraindividual heterogeneity of plasma BNP values is necessary before we proceed to developing a BNP- or proBNP-guided strategy for managing HF.
An alternative interpretation of our observations is that disease progression in HF may occur in parallel to the development of load-independent mechanisms of cardiac (or extracardiac) BNP generation. This may explain why patients with similar clinical and echocardiographic severity of HF may have vastly different plasma BNP values. Earlier stages or more reversible forms of disease may be associated with less cardiac (or extracardiac) activation of the "fetal gene program," leading to relatively lower baseline plasma BNP levels in the compensated state.8 The pathogenesis of HF as well as unknown polymorphisms may also regulate the synthesis, release, and degradation of BNP. Indeed, recent data from the Framingham Study suggested a potential genetic contribution to interindividual variability of plasma BNP levels in the general population.9
This study was limited by its retrospective and cross-sectional nature. The multivariable analysis was based on variables easily available in the clinical setting. Not all patients had available information regarding duration and history of treatment and long-term follow-up, and none had invasive hemodynamic assessment. Echocardiography was not performed simultaneously with BNP testing. Nevertheless, our findings clearly illustrate the importance of interpreting plasma BNP levels within the specific clinical context. Better understanding of the test characteristics is needed before we can effectively use this valuable test to guide therapeutic strategies.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Braunwald Biomarkers in Heart Failure N. Engl. J. Med., May 15, 2008; 358(20): 2148 - 2159. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. N. Kirkpatrick, S. N. Ghani, and K. T. Spencer Hand carried echocardiography screening for LV systolic dysfunction in a pulmonary function laboratory Eur J Echocardiogr, May 1, 2008; 9(3): 381 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Pascual-Figal, M. Domingo, T. Casas, I. Gich, J. Ordonez-Llanos, P. Martinez, J. Cinca, M. Valdes, J. L. Januzzi, and A. Bayes-Genis Usefulness of clinical and NT-proBNP monitoring for prognostic guidance in destabilized heart failure outpatients Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2008; 29(8): 1011 - 1018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. MacFadyen and M. J. Ng Kam Chuen Biomarker Sensitivity and Specificity Require Pre-Test Probability of Disease Diagnosis to Be Collated: Additional Points on the Interpretation of Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Triage of Dyspnea in the Copenhagen Heart Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 2008; 51(13): 1322 - 1323. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. E. Verdejo, P. F. Castro, R. Concepcion, M. A. Ferrada, M. A. Alfaro, M. E. Alcaino, C. C. Deck, and R. C. Bourge Comparison of a Radiofrequency-Based Wireless Pressure Sensor to Swan-Ganz Catheter and Echocardiography for Ambulatory Assessment of Pulmonary Artery Pressure in Heart Failure J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 18, 2007; 50(25): 2375 - 2382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Breidthardt, K. Laule, A.-H. Strohmeyer, C. Schindler, S. Meier, M. Fischer, A. Scholer, M. Noveanu, M. Christ, A. P. Perruchoud, et al. Medical and Economic Long-term Effects of B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Testing in Patients with Acute Dyspnea Clin. Chem., August 1, 2007; 53(8): 1415 - 1422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.H. Wilson Tang, G. S. Francis, D. A. Morrow, L. K. Newby, C. P. Cannon, R. L. Jesse, A. B. Storrow, R. H. Christenson, COMMITTEE MEMBERS, R. H. Christenson, et al. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines: Clinical Utilization of Cardiac Biomarker Testing in Heart Failure Circulation, July 31, 2007; 116(5): e99 - e109. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Canter, R. E. Shaddy, D. Bernstein, D. T. Hsu, M. R.K. Chrisant, J. K. Kirklin, K. R. Kanter, R. S.D. Higgins, E. D. Blume, D. N. Rosenthal, et al. Indications for Heart Transplantation in Pediatric Heart Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; the Councils on Clinical Cardiology, Cardiovascular Nursing, and Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group Circulation, February 6, 2007; 115(5): 658 - 676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Dernellis and M Panaretou Assessment of cardiac risk before non-cardiac surgery: brain natriuretic peptide in 1590 patients Heart, November 1, 2006; 92(11): 1645 - 1650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Shelton, A. L. Clark, K. Goode, A. S. Rigby, and J. G.F. Cleland The diagnostic utility of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide for the detection of major structural heart disease in patients with atrial fibrillation Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2006; 27(19): 2353 - 2361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Felker, J. W. Petersen, and D. B. Mark Natriuretic peptides in the diagnosis and management of heart failure. Can. Med. Assoc. J., September 12, 2006; 175(6): 611 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Price, A. K. Thomas, M. Grenier, B. W. Eidem, E. O. Smith, S. W. Denfield, J. A. Towbin, and W. J. Dreyer B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Predicts Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Pediatric Outpatients With Chronic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Circulation, September 5, 2006; 114(10): 1063 - 1069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Mueller, K. Laule-Kilian, C. Schindler, T. Klima, B. Frana, D. Rodriguez, A. Scholer, M. Christ, and A. P. Perruchoud Cost-effectiveness of B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Testing in Patients With Acute Dyspnea. Arch Intern Med, May 22, 2006; 166(10): 1081 - 1087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Bhatia, M. D. Sosin, J. V. Patel, K. A. Grindulis, F. H. Khattak, E. A. Hughes, G. Y.H. Lip, and R. C. Davis Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Rheumatoid Disease: An Unrecognized Burden? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 21, 2006; 47(6): 1169 - 1174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Iwanaga, I. Nishi, S. Furuichi, T. Noguchi, K. Sase, Y. Kihara, Y. Goto, and H. Nonogi B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Strongly Reflects Diastolic Wall Stress in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: Comparison Between Systolic and Diastolic Heart Failure J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 21, 2006; 47(4): 742 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. B. Horwich, M. A. Hamilton, and G. C. Fonarow B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Levels in Obese Patients With Advanced Heart Failure J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 3, 2006; 47(1): 85 - 90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Sanderson BNP or echocardiography for monitoring heart failure? Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2004; 25(20): 1763 - 1764. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Januzzi, A. S. Maisel, R. W. Troughton, A. M. Richards, T. G. Yandle, M. G. Nicholls, T. Nishikimi, H. Matsuoka, and M. Packer Routine Measurement of Natriuretic Peptide to Guide the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Heart Failure * Response Circulation, June 29, 2004; 109(25): e325 - e326. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nishikimi, H. Matsuoka, W.H. W. Tang, R. C. Starling, J. B. Young, G. S. Francis, J. P. Girod, M. J. Lee, and F. Van Lente Plasma Brain Natriuretic Peptide Levels Indicate the Distance From Decompensated Heart Failure * Response Circulation, June 29, 2004; 109(25): e329 - e330. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Packer Should B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Be Measured Routinely to Guide the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Heart Failure? Circulation, December 16, 2003; 108(24): 2950 - 2953. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |