Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2003;108:2918-2925
Published online before print October 20, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000097001.79750.78
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
108/23/2918    most recent
01.CIR.0000097001.79750.78v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cho, H.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Park, Y.-B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cho, H.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Park, Y.-B.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Restenosis

(Circulation. 2003;108:2918.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Basic Science Reports

Mobilized Endothelial Progenitor Cells by Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Accelerate Reendothelialization and Reduce Vascular Inflammation After Intravascular Radiation

Hyun-Jai Cho, MD; Hyo-Soo Kim, MD; Myoung-Mook Lee, MD; Dae-Hee Kim, MD; Hyun-Ju Yang, BA; Jin Hur, MA; Kyoung-Kook Hwang, MD; Seil Oh, MD; Young-Jin Choi, MD; In-Ho Chae, MD; Byung-Hee Oh, MD; Yun-Shik Choi, MD; Kenneth Walsh, PhD; Young-Bae Park, MD

From the Department of Internal Medicine (H.-J.C., H.-S.K., M.-M.L., D.-H.K., K.-K.H., S.O., I.-H.C., B.-H.O., Y.-S.C., Y.-B.P.), Seoul National University College of Medicine; Department of Internal Medicine (Y.-J.C.), Hallym University College of Medicine; and Cardiovascular Research Laboratory (J.-J.C., H.-S.K., M.-M.L., D.-H.K., H.-J.Y., J.H., K.-K.H., S.O., I.-H.C., B.-H.O., Y.-S.C. Y.-B.P.), Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Korea; and Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute (H.-S.K., K.W.), Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass.

Correspondence to Hyo-Soo Kim, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yongon-dong Chongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea. E-mail hyosoo{at}snu.ac.kr

Received January 27, 2003; de novo received May 30, 2003; revision received July 29, 2003; accepted July 30, 2003.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) play a pivotal role in repair and regeneration of damaged vessels. We investigated the role of mobilized EPCs in the healing process after intravascular radiation therapy.

Methods and Results— One iliac artery of hypercholesterolemic rabbits was subjected to balloon injury and intravascular radiation with a Re-188 balloon and the contralateral iliac artery to balloon injury only. Rabbits received granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (recombinant human GM-CSF) (60 µg/d subcutaneously) daily for 1 week, either 7 days before the angioplasty or at the time of angioplasty. Control rabbits received human albumin. GM-CSF significantly increased the double-positive (CD31+ and KDR+) fraction in peripheral blood monocytes and showed a higher number of EPCs than albumin after culture and, furthermore, enhanced migration and incorporation of EPCs. In the albumin group, intravascular radiation therapy reduced neointimal hyperplasia but delayed reendothelialization and aggravated monocyte infiltration. GM-CSF treatment significantly accelerated the reendothelialization and inhibited monocyte infiltration (reendothelialization index, 81±13% in the GM-CSF radiation [n=7] versus 30±11% in the control radiation [n=9] at 2 weeks, P<0.01). GM-CSF treatment produced an additional significant reduction in neointimal formation at 14 and 28 days after injury in the intravascular radiation groups (intima to media ratio, 0.14±0.11 in the GM-CSF radiation [n=5] versus 0.36±0.07 in the control radiation [n=5] at 4 weeks, P<0.01).

Conclusions— GM-CSF treatment mobilizes EPCs, accelerates reendothelialization, and reduces monocytes infiltration after intravascular radiation therapy, suggesting that stem cell mobilization is a promising strategy for enhancing the vascular healing process after cytotoxic angioplasty.


Key Words: endothelium • angioplasty • restenosis • radioisotopes


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Intravascular radiation therapy has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for preventing restenosis after angioplasty.1,2 This therapy is very effective in ablating proliferating cells and preventing neointimal formation. Nevertheless, several critical limitations remain to be solved. The 2 most important issues have been late thrombosis and delayed restenosis, which may be caused by delayed endothelial regeneration and aggravated inflammatory cell infiltration.3–5 Presently, no adjuvant therapy is available for modulating the disturbed healing process after intravascular radiation therapy.

Reendothelialization at sites of spontaneous or iatrogenic disruption has classically been thought to be the result of the migration and proliferation of endothelial cells from the viable endothelium adjacent to the injury site. Neighboring endothelial cells, however, may not constitute the exclusive source of endothelial cells for repair. Recently, a series of investigations has suggested that endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) derived from the bone marrow are present in peripheral blood and that these cells can be recruited to denuded areas and incorporated into nascent endothelium.6,7 Therefore, mobilization of EPCs may have efficacy for promoting endothelial regeneration, especially after intravascular radiation therapy, where endothelial regeneration is delayed in the vascular healing process.

In this study, we investigated the hypothesis that the mobilization of EPCs by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) may accelerate the endothelial regeneration after intravascular radiation and inhibit the infiltration of inflammatory cells, leading to an additional reduction in neointimal formation.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Animal Experiment and Intravascular Radiation
Male New Zealand White rabbits (3 to 3.5 kg; Yonam Laboratory Animals, Cheonan, Korea) received a 1% cholesterol diet (Oriental East Co) for 2 weeks before arterial injury. Balloon injury was administered to bilateral iliac arteries using a 3.0x30-mm balloon, as previously reported.8 After baseline overstretch balloon injury, unilateral iliac arteries were treated with intravascular radiation with Re-188-DTPA/contrast-filled balloon. The target dose on the arterial segment was 18 Gy at a depth of 1 mm from the balloon-arterial interface. The GM-CSF pretreatment group (n=15) received recombinant human GM-CSF (60 µg/d injected subcutaneously, LG Chemical Co) daily for 1 week, beginning 7 days before the procedure. The control group (n=18) received subcutaneous injections of human albumin. Another experimental group received GM-CSF treatment immediately after injury for 7 days, whereas controls received albumin. (n=5, GM-CSF group; n=5, albumin group). Animals were killed at 3 and 14 days after injury in the GM-CSF pretreatment group and at 28 days after injury in the GM-CSF simultaneous injury group to assess vessel morphometry and histology. This study was approved by the Experimental Animal Committee of Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital.

Vessel Morphometric and Immunohistochemical Analyses
Arteries were stained with H&E and elastic fiber staining and subjected to immunohistochemistry for the detection of macrophage (RAM-11, DAKO) and endothelium (CD31, DAKO). In addition to CD31 staining, scanning electron microscopy was performed to evaluate endothelial recovery and morphology. Samples for electron microscopy were fixed in glutaraldehyde and processed using standard technique.9 Morphometric analysis was performed with a computerized digital image analysis system (DP50 digital camera and Image Pro version 4.5, MediaCybernetics) by a single observer who was blinded to prior treatment as previously described.10 The reendothelialization index was defined as CD31-stained luminal length per entire luminal circumference.

Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting Analysis and Rabbit EPC Culture
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PB-MNCs) were isolated by Histopaque-1083 (Sigma) density gradient centrifugation. FACS was used to detect the expression of cell-surface antigens for endothelial lineage in peripheral blood, as previously described.11,12 Primary antibodies to CD31 (DAKO) and CD34 (BD-PharMingen) were used with secondary detection using an FITC-conjugated antibody (Becton-Dickinson) in each case. We performed also dual staining with PE- and FITC-labeled anti-CD31 (Becton-Dickinson) and KDR (Sigma) antibodies. PB-MNCs were cultured in EGM-2 media (Clonetics) with 5% FBS on gelatin-coated plates up to 4 weeks. Cells were assayed by costaining with DiI/acLDL (Molecular Probes) and FITC-conjugated BS-1 lectin (Sigma) at 2 and 4 weeks, as previously described.12,13

EPC Migration Assay (Scratch-Wound Assay)
After 3 weeks culture, in vitro scratched wounds were created by scraping cell monolayers with a sterile disposable rubber policeman, as previously described.14,15 The remaining cells were washed with medium (EBM, Clonetics) and incubated with or without GM-CSF (0.1 and 10 ng/mL) over 12, 24, and 48 hours. EPC migration into denuded area was quantified with a computerized digital image analysis system.

EPC Incorporation
For in vitro analysis of incorporation, DiI-labeled (Molecular Probes) cultured EPCs were incubated on a monolayer of HUVECs with or without GM-CSF (0.1 and 10 ng/mL). Five hours after incubation, nonadherent cells were removed by washing with PBS.16 The total number of adhesive EPCs in each well was counted in a blinded manner under a 100 magnification field of a fluorescent microscope. To assess in vivo EPC incorporation into injured arteries, 3x106 cultured EPCs were infused systemically to balloon-injured rabbit.

Statistical Analysis
All data are presented as mean±SD. Continuous variables were compared using the Student t test and the Mann-Whitney U test, and multiple comparisons were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and ANOVA with a Bonferroni correction using SPSS 10.0. P<0.05 was considered significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Serum Cholesterol Level and Hematologic Data
After 2 weeks on a 1% cholesterol diet, the baseline serum total cholesterol levels were similar in the albumin and the GM-CSF groups (824±165 versus 851±197 mg/dL, P=0.7), and no significant difference in the number of total white blood cells (6224±2177 versus 5691±1885/µL, P=0.6), red blood cells, or platelets was observed after administering human albumin or GM-CSF for 7 days. The total white blood cell count was unchanged by injury.

Effect of Radiation on Neointimal Proliferation, Endothelial Regeneration, and Macrophage Infiltration
Morphometric analysis at 14 and 28 days showed that intravascular radiation after balloon injury significantly reduced neointimal thickening and the intima to media ratio compared with balloon injury alone (Table). However, radiation aggravated the infiltration of foam cells derived from macrophages (Figure 1). Such macrophage infiltration was associated with the delayed endothelial regeneration after intravascular radiation, as shown in Figures 2A and 2B.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Morphometric Analysis 14 and 28 Days After Injury With or Without GM-CSF Treatment



View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effects of intravascular radiation therapy with GM-CSF treatment after balloon injury on iliac artery of hypercholesterolemic rabbits. A, Intravascular radiation therapy significantly inhibited neointimal formation after balloon injury, whose effect was potentiated by GM-CSF pretreatment at 14 days after injury. Sections were stained with elastic fiber stain. B, GM-CSF pretreatment significantly reduced macrophage infiltration that was aggravated by intravascular radiation therapy. In the balloon injury alone group, pretreatment with GM-CSF had no effect on the neointimal formation or macrophage infiltration. (Immunohistochemical staining against RAM11 for rabbit macrophage). Arrowheads indicate internal elastic lamina; I, intima; M, media. C, Simultaneous GM-CSF treatment after injury was also as effective as pretreatment. At 28 days after injury, intimal hemorrhage and fibrin deposition were present in control irradiated arteries but not in GM-CSF. Sections were stained with elastic fiber stain.



View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Accelerated endothelial regeneration after intravascular radiation therapy with GM-CSF. A, High-power light photomicrographs of immunohistochemistry for CD31 antigen at 14 days after injury with GM-CSF pretreatment. Intravascular radiation therapy delayed endothelial regeneration, which was accelerated by GM-CSF treatment. B, Scanning electron microscopy of lumen surfaces at 28 days after injury. In the brachytherapy group, reendothelialization is severely disturbed and platelets (arrows) and leukocytes (arrow head) adhering on denuded surface are observed. These adverse effects were minimized by GM-CSF treatment. GM-CSF had no effect in the balloon injury alone group, where endothelial recovery was normal. C, Intravascular radiation showed persistent failure of endothelial regeneration. GM-CSF treatment accelerated the endothelial regeneration, which was comparable to that of balloon injury alone. *P<0.05, GM-CSF vs albumin in balloon-radiation group at 3 days after injury; {dagger}P<0.01, 14 days after injury with pretreatment; #P<0.01, 28 days after injury with simultaneous treatment. Reendothelialization index was determined from the CD31 staining data.

Effect of GM-CSF Injection on Neointimal Proliferation and Macrophage Infiltration
As shown in Figure 1B, GM-CSF pretreatment reduced foam cell infiltration that was observed after radiation therapy. Furthermore, pretreatment or simultaneous treatment with GM-CSF potentiated the efficacy of radiation therapy, showing additional reduction of neointimal formation or intima to media ratio at both 14 and 28 days after injury (Table and Figure 1). In the balloon injury alone group, the effect of GM-CSF was neither harmful nor beneficial (Figure 1 and Table). At 28 days after injury, intimal hemorrhage and fibrin deposition were observed in irradiated arteries of control animals but not in animals that received GM-CSF (Figure 1C).

Effect of GM-CSF on Reendothelialization
Reendothelialization indices were determined by CD31 immunohistochemical staining and scanning electron microscopy (Figure 2). Reendothelialization after radiation therapy was significantly accelerated by GM-CSF compared with albumin treatment at 14 days in the pretreatment regimen and at 28 days in the simultaneous treatment regimen. This difference was apparent as early as 3 days after radiation (51±12% versus 34±11%, GM-CSF [n=5] versus albumin [n=7], respectively, P<0.05). The effect of GM-CSF to enhance the endothelial regeneration was notable only after intravascular radiation therapy, when endothelial recovery was seriously impaired, and it had no detectable effect in the balloon injury alone condition, when endothelial regeneration had not been impaired (Figure 2).

GM-CSF Increases Endothelial Progenitor Cell Mobilization and Growth
To demonstrate that GM-CSF increases the number of EPCs, PB-MNCs were isolated for FACS analysis and culture assay. FACS analysis showed that the CD31-positive and CD34-positive fractions were greater in the GM-CSF than albumin group. These data were corroborated by dual FACS analysis with KDR as an additional endothelial marker (Figure 3A). PB-MNCs from GM-CSF and control rabbits were cultured for 4 weeks in EPC growth media. EPCs, defined as double-positive cells showing the phenotypes of DiI/acLDL uptake and FITC-conjugated BS1-lectin binding, were quantified (Figures 3B and 3C). The number of EPCs was significantly greater in PB-MNCs from the GM-CSF–treated group than from those treated with albumin (33±15 versus 6±4/mm2, P<0.05 at 2 weeks; 446±101 versus 58±29 /mm2, P<0.01 at 4 weeks; n=5).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. GM-CSF increases endothelial progenitor cell mobilization and growth. A, GM-CSF increased the proportions of the EPCs among circulating PB-MNCs. Representative FACS analysis of surface antigens and dual analysis with endothelial markers. Black lines represent IgG control-labeled cells; red lines, test antibodies (anti-CD31, anti-CD34, and KDR). B, DiI/acLDL uptake and FITC-conjugated BS-1 lectin binding were observed in the growing cells after 4 weeks of culture of PB-MNCs with GM-CSF. C, The number of EPCs defined as cells double-positive for DiI/acLDL and FITC-conjugated BS-1 lectin after culturing PB-MNCs was higher with GM-CSF treatment than from those with albumin. *P<0.05, GM-CSF vs albumin control 2 weeks after culture; {dagger}P<0.01, 4 weeks after culture.

Effect of GM-CSF on Endothelial Progenitor Cell Migration
Migration was assessed by scratch-wound assay for EPCs that were derived from GM-CSF–treated or albumin-treated rabbit and cultured for 3 weeks (Figure 4A). There was no significant difference of migration distances between 2 groups of EPCs at 3 weeks in vitro culture when GM-CSF was not present (Figure 4B). However, addition of GM-CSF in culture media (0.1 and 10 ng/mL) enhanced EPC migration dose dependently (Figures 4A and 4C). This effect was observed even at low doses of GM-CSF and more apparent at high doses of GM-CSF (GM-CSF 10 ng, 1.26±0.14 mm; GM-CSF 0.1 ng, 1.18±0.17 mm; and medium only, 0.76±0.13 mm; P<0.01; Figures 4A and 4C).



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. GM-CSF enhances endothelial progenitor cell migration in vitro. A, EPC migration was enhanced in the presence of GM-CSF in culture medium. Representative images of EPC migration after 48 hours of incubation in scratch-wound assay. B, Migration distances from scratch-wound edges were not significantly different between the 2 groups of EPCs that were harvested from GM-CSF–treated or albumin-treated rabbit and cultured for 3weeks. (n=5, respectively). C, EPC migration significantly increased under GM-CSF (10 ng/mL) in the medium compared with under 0.1 ng/mL GM-CSF or medium only after 48 hours of incubation, (n=5; *P<0.05, 0.1 ng/mL GM-CSF vs medium; {dagger}P<0.01, 10 ng/mL GM-CSF vs medium).

Incorporation of Endothelial Progenitor Cell
DiI-labeled cultured EPCs were incubated on a monolayer of HUVECs with or without GM-CSF (0.1 and 10 ng/mL). Five hours after incubation, nonadherent cells were gently removed. Incorporation of EPCs with HUVECs under 10 ng/mL GM-CSF exceeded that under GM-CSF 0.1 ng/mL or medium only (Figures 5A and 5B; n=5; GM-CSF 10 ng, 28.2±3.1; GM-CSF 0.1 ng, 19.8±4.7; 15.6±5.9 cells per 100 magnification field of a fluorescent microscope, P<0.05, GM-CSF 10 ng versus medium only).



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. In vitro and in vivo incorporation of endothelial progenitor cell. A, GM-CSF increased incorporation of EPCs on HUVEC monolayer after 5 hours of incubation. Red dots represent the incorporated EPCs that were labeled with DiI. Representative fluorescence microscopic images. White bars indicate 100-µm length. B, Incorporation of EPCs into HUVECs was greater under 10 ng/mL GM-CSF than that under 0.1 ng/mL GM-CSF or medium only (n=5; *P<0.05, 10 ng/mL GM-CSF vs medium only). C, Cultured EPCs that were labeled with Vibrant DiI and introduced systemically, incorporated onto denuded luminal surface of the irradiated arteries at 3 days after injury. Incorporation was also observed in the reticuloendothelial system but not in the uninjured arteries nor in the heart. Red dots represent DiI-labeled EPCs; green line, autofluorescence; image with double fluorescences merged.

Finally, to confirm that circulating EPCs home to balloon-injured arterial segment, cultured EPCs were labeled and infused systemically to rabbit after balloon injury. Tissues were harvested at 3 days after infusion of the EPCs and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. As shown in Figure 5C, DiI-labeled red fluorescent EPCs were homed to the denuded arterial site and incorporated into endothelial regeneration at injured arteries. Labeled EPC incorporation was also observed in the reticuloendothelial system (liver and spleen) but not in uninjured arteries, lung, kidney, and heart.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Intravascular irradiation reduces neointimal proliferation after coronary intervention.1–3 However, this procedure is associated with incomplete healing, the infiltration of inflammatory cells, and thrombosis.4,5 Irradiated arteries display poor endothelial regeneration even at 1 month after angioplasty, whereas control arteries with balloon-injury alone have complete regeneration of a monolayer of endothelial cells. Delayed endothelial regeneration and thrombosis require the prolonged administration of antiplatelet agents as adjuvant therapy for patients who undergo intravascular radiation therapy.17

Recently, statin therapy has been reported to mobilize EPCs, resulting in accelerated endothelial regeneration and suppression of neointimal hyperplasia after balloon-denudation injury in the rat carotid artery.12 Enhanced endothelial regeneration by gene therapy has been also shown to suppress thrombogenic property and neointimal hyperplasia in a rabbit vein graft model.18,19 Cytokines such as GM-CSF have been suggested to exert a potent stimulatory effect on EPC kinetics, and cytokine-induced EPC mobilization has been reported to enhance neovascularization of ischemic tissues.13 However, the effects of cytokine-induced EPC mobilization on the healing process after angioplasty or intravascular radiation therapy has not been examined.

In this study, pretreatment or simultaneous treatment with GM-CSF diminished the adverse effects of intravascular radiation therapy by accelerating reendothelialization. Furthermore, it potentiated the efficacy of radiation therapy to suppress neointimal proliferation in the injured arteries. We hypothesize that under these conditions, EPCs contribute to the early endothelial regeneration and the suppression of inflammation. GM-CSF was shown to mobilize EPCs under these conditions, and EPCs homed to the denuded luminal surface of irradiated arteries. When EPCs were harvested and cultured for 3 weeks in GM-CSF–withdrawn condition, 2 groups of EPCs harvested from GM-CSF–treated or albumin-treated rabbit did not show functional difference in the aspect of migration and incorporation. But the incubation with GM-CSF enhanced migration and incorporation function of EPCs. Taken together, GM-CSF not only increased the number of circulating EPCs from bone marrow but also enhanced their migration and incorporation function.

GM-CSF is relatively inexpensive and safe, and it has been used extensively in patients. Therefore, a randomized clinical trial to test the efficacy of GM-CSF after intravascular radiation may be warranted.

In conclusion, our study demonstrates that the cytokine-induced EPC mobilization is a promising strategy to normalize the healing process after angioplasty that may be impaired by the coadministration of cytotoxic or cytostatic agents, including intravascular radiation therapy or drug-eluting stents.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by a grant from the Korea Health 21 R&D project, the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (02-PJ10-PG8-EC01-0026 to Dr H.-S. Kim), and a grant from the Stem Cell Research Center, Republic of Korea (M102KL010001-02K1201-01810 to Dr Park). Dr Lee is the recipient of grant from the Ministry of Health & Welfare (00-PJ1-PG1-CH01-0005).


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Leon MB, Teirstein PS, Moses JW, et al. Localized intracoronary gamma-radiation therapy to inhibit the recurrence of restenosis after stenting. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 250–256.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Teirstein PS, Massullo V, Jani S, et al. Three-year clinical and angiographic follow-up after intracoronary radiation. Circulation. 2000; 101: 360–365.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Grise MA, Massullo V, Jani S, et al. Five-year clinical follow-up after intracoronary radiation: results of a randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 2002; 105: 2737–2740.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Salame MY, Verheye S, Mulkey SP, et al. The effect of endovascular irradiation on platelet recruitment at sites of balloon angioplasty in pig coronary arteries. Circulation. 2000; 101: 1087–1090.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Coussement PK, Leon H, Ueno T, et al. Intracoronary radiation exacerbates long-term neointima formation in balloon-injured pig coronary arteries. Circulation. 2001; 104: 2459–2464.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, et al. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science. 1997; 275: 964–967.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Shi Q, Rafii S, Wu MH, et al. Evidence for circulating bone marrow derived endothelial cells. Blood. 1998; 92: 362–367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Song JM, Kim HS, Rhee MY, et al. Effect of hypercholesterolemia on the sequential change of apoptosis and proliferation after balloon injury to rabbit iliac artery. Atherosclerosis. 2000; 150: 309–320.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Waksman R, Robinson KA, Crocker IR, et al. Intracoronary low-dose beta-irradiation inhibits neointima formation after coronary artery balloon injury in the swine restenosis model. Circulation. 1995; 92; 3025–3031.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Hiltunen MO, Laitinen M, Turunen MP, et al. Intravascular adenovirus-mediated VEGF-C gene transfer reduces neointimal formation in balloon-denuded rabbit aorta. Circulation. 2000; 102: 2262–2268.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Schmid I, Uittenbogaart CH, Giorgi JV. A gentle fixation and permeabilization method for combined cell surface and intracellular staining with improved precision in DNA quantification. Cytometry. 1991; 12: 279–285.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Walter DH, Rittig K, Bahlmann FH, et al. Statin therapy accelerates reendothelialization: a novel effect involving mobilization and incorporation of bone barrow–derived endothelial progenitor cells. Circulation. 2002; 105: 3017–3024.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Takahashi T, Kalka C, Masuda H, et al. Ischemia- and cytokine-induced mobilization of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells for neovascularization. Nat Med. 1999; 5:4: 434–438.
  14. Tamura M, Gu J, Matsumoto K, et al. Inhibition of cell migration, spreading and focal adhesions by tumor suppressor PTEN. Science. 1998; 280: 1614–1617.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Urbich C, Dernbach E, Zeiher AM, et al. Double-edged role of statins in angiogenesis signaling. Circ Res. 2002; 90: 737–744.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Iwaguro H, Yamaguchi J, Kalka C, et al. Endothelial progenitor cell vascular endothelial growth factor gene transfer for vascular regeneration. Circulation. 2002; 105: 732–738.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Waksman R, Ajani AE, Pinnow E, et al. Twelve versus six months of clopidogrel to reduce major cardiac events in patients undergoing radiation therapy for in-stent restenosis: Washington Radiation for In-Stent restenosis Trial (WRIST) 12 versus WRIST PLUS. Circulation. 2002; 106: 776–778.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ehsan A, Mann MJ, Dell’Acqua D, et al. Endothelial healing in vein grafts: proliferative burst unimpaired by genetic therapy of neointimal disease. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1686–1692.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Ohno N, Itoh H, Ikeda T, et al. Accelerated reendothelialization with suppressed thrombogenic property and neointimal hyperplasia of rabbit jugular vein grafts by adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of C-type natriuretic peptide. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1623–1626.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular DiseaseHome page
T. J. Povsic and P. J. Goldschmidt-Clermont
Review: Endothelial progenitor cells: markers of vascular reparative capacity
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, June 1, 2008; 2(3): 199 - 213.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
S. -T. Lee, K. Chu, K. -H. Jung, D. -H. Kim, E. -H. Kim, V. N. Choe, J. -H. Kim, W. -S. Im, L. Kang, J. -E. Park, et al.
Decreased number and function of endothelial progenitor cells in patients with migraine
Neurology, April 22, 2008; 70(17): 1510 - 1517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
R. G. Shaffer, S. Greene, A. Arshi, G. Supple, A. Bantly, J. S Moores, M. S Parmacek, and E. R Mohler III
Effect of acute exercise on endothelial progenitor cells in patients with peripheral arterial disease
Vascular Medicine, November 1, 2006; 11(4): 219 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
M. Pirro, G. Schillaci, R. Paltriccia, F. Bagaglia, C. Menecali, M. R. Mannarino, M. Capanni, A. Velardi, and E. Mannarino
Increased Ratio of CD31+/CD42- Microparticles to Endothelial Progenitors as a Novel Marker of Atherosclerosis in Hypercholesterolemia
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., November 1, 2006; 26(11): 2530 - 2535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. Guven, R. M. Shepherd, R. G. Bach, B. J. Capoccia, and D. C. Link
The Number of Endothelial Progenitor Cell Colonies in the Blood Is Increased in Patients With Angiographically Significant Coronary Artery Disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 17, 2006; 48(8): 1579 - 1587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H.-J. Cho, T.-Y. Kim, H.-J. Cho, K.-W. Park, S.-Y. Zhang, J.-H. Kim, S.-H. Kim, J.-Y. Hahn, H.-J. Kang, Y.-B. Park, et al.
The Effect of Stem Cell Mobilization by Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor on Neointimal Hyperplasia and Endothelial Healing After Vascular Injury With Bare-Metal Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 18, 2006; 48(2): 366 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H.-J. Kang, H.-Y. Lee, S.-H. Na, S.-A Chang, K.-W. Park, H.-K. Kim, S.-Y. Kim, H.-J. Chang, W. Lee, W. J. Kang, et al.
Differential Effect of Intracoronary Infusion of Mobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cells by Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor on Left Ventricular Function and Remodeling in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Versus Old Myocardial Infarction: The MAGIC Cell-3-DES Randomized, Controlled Trial
Circulation, July 4, 2006; 114(1_suppl): I-145 - I-151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
G. P. Fadini, M. Schiavon, M. Cantini, I. Baesso, M. Facco, M. Miorin, M. Tassinato, S. V. d. Kreutzenberg, A. Avogaro, and C. Agostini
Circulating Progenitor Cells Are Reduced in Patients with Severe Lung Disease
Stem Cells, July 1, 2006; 24(7): 1806 - 1813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
M. Ii, H. Takenaka, J. Asai, K. Ibusuki, Y. Mizukami, K. Maruyama, Y.-s. Yoon, A. Wecker, C. Luedemann, E. Eaton, et al.
Endothelial Progenitor Thrombospondin-1 Mediates Diabetes-Induced Delay in Reendothelialization Following Arterial Injury
Circ. Res., March 17, 2006; 98(5): 697 - 704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
G. P. Fadini, S. Sartore, I. Baesso, M. Lenzi, C. Agostini, A. Tiengo, and A. Avogaro
Endothelial progenitor cells and the diabetic paradox.
Diabetes Care, March 1, 2006; 29(3): 714 - 716.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
D. Mehta and A. B. Malik
Signaling Mechanisms Regulating Endothelial Permeability
Physiol Rev, January 1, 2006; 86(1): 279 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
K.-i. Kim, H.-J. Cho, J.-Y. Hahn, T.-Y. Kim, K.-W. Park, B.-K. Koo, C. Soo Shin, C.-H. Kim, B.-H. Oh, M.-M. Lee, et al.
{beta}-Catenin Overexpression Augments Angiogenesis and Skeletal Muscle Regeneration Through Dual Mechanism of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Mediated Endothelial Cell Proliferation and Progenitor Cell Mobilization
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., January 1, 2006; 26(1): 91 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
H. Tan, X. Jiang, F. Yang, Z. Li, D. Liao, J. Trial, M. J. Magera, W. Durante, X. Yang, and H. Wang
Hyperhomocysteinemia inhibits post-injury reendothelialization in mice
Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2006; 69(1): 253 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
T. J. O'Neill IV, B. R. Wamhoff, G. K. Owens, and T. C. Skalak
Mobilization of Bone Marrow-Derived Cells Enhances the Angiogenic Response to Hypoxia Without Transdifferentiation Into Endothelial Cells
Circ. Res., November 11, 2005; 97(10): 1027 - 1035.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. Ruel, E. J. Suuronen, J. Song, V. Kapila, D. Gunning, G. Waghray, F. D. Rubens, and T. G. Mesana
Effects of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on function and viability of circulating endothelial progenitor cells
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2005; 130(3): 633 - 639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
M. Rojas, J. Xu, C. R. Woods, A. L. Mora, W. Spears, J. Roman, and K. L. Brigham
Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Repair of the Injured Lung
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., August 1, 2005; 33(2): 145 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
V. J. Dzau, M. Gnecchi, A. S. Pachori, F. Morello, and L. G. Melo
Therapeutic Potential of Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Cardiovascular Diseases
Hypertension, July 1, 2005; 46(1): 7 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
T. Thum and J. Bauersachs
Spotlight on endothelial progenitor cell inhibitors: short review
Vascular Medicine, May 1, 2005; 10(2_suppl): S59 - S64.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M-H Gaugler
A unifying system: does the vascular endothelium have a role to play in multi-organ failure following radiation exposure?
Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2005; Supplement_27(1): 100 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
F. Fernandez-Aviles, J. A. San Roman, J. Garcia-Frade, M. E. Fernandez, M. J. Penarrubia, L. de la Fuente, M. Gomez-Bueno, A. Cantalapiedra, J. Fernandez, O. Gutierrez, et al.
Experimental and Clinical Regenerative Capability of Human Bone Marrow Cells After Myocardial Infarction
Circ. Res., October 1, 2004; 95(7): 742 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
L.G Melo, M Gnecchi, A.S Pachori, K Wang, and V.J Dzau
Gene- and cell-based therapies for cardiovascular diseases: current status and future directions
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., September 1, 2004; 6(suppl_E): E24 - E35.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. H. Walter, M. Cejna, L. Diaz-Sandoval, S. Willis, L. Kirkwood, P. W. Stratford, A. B. Tietz, R. Kirchmair, M. Silver, C. Curry, et al.
Local Gene Transfer of phVEGF-2 Plasmid by Gene-Eluting Stents: An Alternative Strategy for Inhibition of Restenosis
Circulation, July 6, 2004; 110(1): 36 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
108/23/2918    most recent
01.CIR.0000097001.79750.78v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cho, H.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Park, Y.-B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cho, H.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Park, Y.-B.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH