| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2003;108:211.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Basic Science Reports |
From the Department of Pharmacological Sciences and Center of Excellence on Neurodegenerative Disease (A.M., A.B.), University of Milan, Italy.
Correspondance to Prof Adriana Maggi, Center of Excellence on Neurodegenerative Disease, Via Balzaretti 9, 20133 Milan, Italy. E-mail adriana.maggi{at}unimi.it
Received January 30, 2003; revision received March 27, 2003; accepted March 31, 2003.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Comparative analysis of NO release and of iNOS mRNA and protein content after 24-hour stimulation with a cytokine mixture revealed milder iNOS activation in diabetic than in control SMC. Furthermore, 17ß-estradiol dose-dependently blocked iNOS synthesis and activity in control but not in diabetic SMC. The defective estrogen response in diabetic SMC at 24 hours could not be attributed to reduced expression of estrogen receptors (ER). In fact, mRNA and protein levels of ER
and, to a greater extent, of ERß, were increased in diabetic compared with nondiabetic SMC. Cytokines decreased ER
and ERß expression in both groups. However, 17ß-estradiol dose-dependently restored the expression of ER
but further downregulated that of ERß, indicating a differential regulation of ER isoforms.
Conclusions Estrogenic control of iNOS was impaired in diabetic SMC. This was associated with a larger increase of ERß than of ER
protein, whereas 17ß-estradiol regulated the two isoforms in an opposite fashion. Thus, modifications in the estrogen modulation of iNOS and in the expression pattern of ER may be involved in diabetic vascular dysfunction.
Key Words: myocytes nitric oxide synthase diabetes mellitus hormones
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We previously showed that diabetes impairs vascular function in female streptozotocin-diabetic rats by interfering with NO pathways.7 In women, diabetes abolishes the gender advantage in cardiovascular risk typical of premenopause.8 This protection is thought to be mediated, at least in part, by endogenous 17ß-estradiol (E2) through mechanisms still under investigation.
Thus far, two estrogen receptors (ER) have been identified: ER
and ERß. These proteins are encoded by two separate genes, are distinct structurally and functionally, and are expressed in endothelial cells,9 SMC,10,11 and macrophages.12 In endothelial cells, E2 increases the expression of eNOS, thereby controlling the tone of underlying SMC,13 and may also rapidly activate eNOS through ER
-mediated mechanisms not involving gene expression.14,15 Conversely, E2 blocks the synthesis of iNOS induced by inflammatory stimuli in SMC11 and macrophages,12 suggesting that the beneficial effect of the hormone arises from a combined action on different vascular cell types.
The aim of the present study was to further investigate the effects of E2 on the expression and activity of iNOS in cultured aortic SMC from diabetic rats. In this study, we show that iNOS response to inflammatory events in SMC from diabetic rats is less sensitive to estrogen, probably on account of altered ER
/ERß ratio. These findings indicate possible mechanisms underlying the increased risk of cardiovascular disease in diabetic premenopausal women.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and anti-ERß antibodies were kindly provided by Dr Geoffrey L. Greene (University of Chicago). Oligodeoxynucleotides were synthesized by Amersham Biosciences.
Diabetes Induction
Diabetes was induced by intravenous injection of STZ (65 mg/kg) in male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 200 to 225 g (Charles River, Calco, Italy). STZ was freshly dissolved in citrate buffer (pH 4.5); control animals were injected with vehicle. Diabetes induction was considered successful when glycosuria was detectable 1 week after treatment. When the animals were killed, they had plasma glucose levels >25 mmol/L. The procedures followed were in accordance with institutional guidelines of the University of Milan.
Cell Culture
SMC were obtained from aortic intimal-medial layers of nondiabetic and 28-day diabetic rats according to Ross.16 Cells were grown in medium 199 (M199) as previously described.11 The medium was replaced with phenol redfree M199 with 10% FCS for 5 days whenever the effects of E2 were tested. Twenty-four hours before starting experiments, cells were synchronized in medium containing 0.4% FCS. SMC were then incubated for the indicated time with a cytokine mixture comprising 10 ng/mL interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß), 10 ng/mL interferon-
(IFN-
), 25 ng/mL tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-
, and 10 µg/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS). We previously demonstrated that this mixture consistently stimulated iNOS protein synthesis in SMC.11 E2 and/or other compounds were added along with cytokines.
Gene Expression Analysis
Total RNA was extracted from SMC (2x105 cells/well) and rat uterus (as a positive control for ER mRNA expression) with the Bio/RNA-X Cell kit (Bio/Gene, Kimbolton, UK). RNA was reverse transcribed using MMLV reverse transcriptase H(-) (Promega). Amplification of ER
and ERß cDNAs was carried out with the use of published primer sequences.11 Amplification of iNOS cDNA was achieved by using the primer pair 5'-ATGGCCGACCTGAT-GTTGCC-3' (reverse) and 5'-TTTGACCAGAGGACCCAGAG-3' (forward). The intensity of PCR product bands was normalized to that of the housekeeping gene GADPH by densitometric analysis with the use of the Quantity-One software (Bio-Rad).
Western Blot Analysis
After quantification by Lowrys method,17 28 µg of cell protein was loaded onto discontinuous gradient SDS-PAGE (10% to 5%) gels. After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane and incubated first with the primary antibodies (all 1:1000) overnight, then with the peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Bio-Rad) for 1 hour. Proteins were detected by chemiluminescence (Amersham Biosciences).
Nitrite Assay
For nitrite measurement by Griess reaction,11 200 µL/well of medium was placed in a 96-well plate, and 20 µL of 6.5 mol/L HCl and 20 µL of 37.5 mmol/L sulfanilic acid was added. After incubation for 10 minutes, 20 µL of 12.5 mmol/L N-(1-naphthyl)-ethylenediamine was added. Optical density was read after 20 minutes at 550 nm (nitrite values are expressed as µmol nitrite/mg cell protein).
Statistical Analysis
Data were obtained from at least 3 independent experiments, each value representing mean±SEM of duplicate or triplicate determinations. Differences between mean values of multiple groups were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA with Fishers analysis. Values of P<0.05 were considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
4.5-fold (Figure 1), 11 but this was significantly opposed by E2 (10-11 to 10-9 mol/L). Basal nitrite levels were not affected by E2 in either group. In SMC from diabetic rats, cytokines increased nitrite production only 2.4-fold, and E2 did not block cytokine effects but led to a slight dose-dependent increase in nitrite levels (Figure 1). This suggests that diabetes induced alterations in SMC metabolism that persisted in the absence of high glucose levels and affected the estrogenic control of nitrite production.
|
Some vascular dysfunction can be reversed by increasing NOS substrate or adding antioxidants.2 We then evaluated whether the altered response to cytokine stimulation in diabetic SMC was related to shortage of iNOS substrate or cofactors or to increased oxidant activities. As shown in the Table, addition of increasing concentrations of the iNOS substrate L-arginine or cofactor sepiapterin did not augment nitrite accumulation in the medium of diabetic SMC, suggesting that those were not limiting steps for iNOS activity. Similarly, addition of either ascorbic acid or lercanidipine (a vascular-selective calcium channel blocker with marked antioxidant properties) failed to affect nitrite production, suggesting that no increased oxidant burden impaired iNOS activity.
|
In both SMC groups, the cytokine-induced nitrite increase was reversed by the nonselective NOS inhibitor L-NAME and the relatively selective iNOS inhibitor EIT (Figure 2), suggesting that it was secondary to iNOS induction. After 24-hour cytokine challenge, nitrite levels were again greater in the media of control SMC than in those of diabetic SMC. However, at 48 hours, nitrite content in the two groups was comparable. Further investigation showed that such differences reflected a distinct temporal pattern of iNOS protein induction. In fact, we consistently measured the highest iNOS protein levels after 48-hour cytokine treatment in diabetic SMC and after 24 hours in control SMC (Figure 3). After 72 hours, iNOS protein levels decreased, yet were significantly higher than in untreated cells. This delayed response to cytokine stimulation in diabetes was not restricted to isolated SMC but was also observed in whole aortic rings in culture under identical conditions (not shown).
|
|
E2 Exerts Opposite Modulation of iNOS Synthesis in Control and Diabetic SMC
We then evaluated the content of iNOS mRNA and protein after E2 treatment. As expected, iNOS mRNA was undetectable in untreated SMC from either group, as shown by semiquantitative RT-PCR. In control SMC, cytokine stimulation for 24 hours increased iNOS mRNA content; a modest induction was observed in diabetic SMC as well. However, the overall effect of E2 was opposite in the two groups. In fact, E2 (10-11 to 10-9 mol/L) dose-dependently reduced iNOS mRNA levels in control SMC but increased iNOS mRNA in diabetic SMC severalfold compared with cytokine-treated diabetic and
2-fold compared with cytokine-treated control SMC (data not shown).
Western blot experiments showed that E2 reduced in a dose-dependent manner iNOS protein content in cytokine-treated control SMC (Figure 4A). By contrast, treatment with E2 did not affect iNOS protein levels in diabetic SMC despite increased mRNA levels. As shown in Figure 4B, after 48-hour cytokine stimulation, E2 was about as effective in control as in diabetic SMC at reducing iNOS protein content, indicating that the early difference in response to E2 between control and diabetic SMC leveled off at later time points. Similar results were obtained for iNOS activity (data not shown).
|
Loss of E2-Inhibitory Control on iNOS Gene Expression Correlates With Decreased ER
and Increased ERß Expression
The antithetical control of E2 on iNOS expression in SMC from diabetic and nondiabetic rats after 24-hour cytokine incubation could not be ascribed to deficiencies in iNOS system. This led us to investigate whether diabetes had altered the expression pattern of ERs. It was apparent that (1) the mRNA of ER
was more abundant than that of ERß in untreated diabetic and nondiabetic SMC and (2) both ER
and ERß mRNA levels were consistently greater in diabetic than in control SMC under any condition tested (Figure 5). Cytokine incubation for 24 hours markedly reduced ER
mRNA levels, whereas E2 (10-11 to 10-9 mol/L) dose-dependently restored ER
expression in both groups. On cytokine treatment, ERß mRNA decreased by
50% in diabetic SMC and fell to barely detectable levels in control SMC (Figure 5). In sharp contrast to ER
, E2 dose-dependently reduced ERß mRNA in diabetic SMC but had no detectable effect in control SMC.
|
In contrast to the strong accumulation of ER
mRNA in diabetic with respect to nondiabetic SMC, the levels of ER
protein were increased by 40% to 50% only (Figure 6). In both SMC groups, cytokines strongly decreased ER
levels, and this was dose-dependently reversed by E2. Experimental diabetes, on the other hand, had a marked impact on ERß protein level, which was >than 2-fold higher than in nondiabetic SMC. ERß content was not affected by cytokine treatment but was significantly diminished by E2, particularly in diabetic SMC (Figure 6).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and ERß relative content. These differences may be relevant to diabetic vascular dysfunction.
Data from our group and other groups indicate that the E2 antagonism to the synthesis of inflammatory proteins is mediated by ER because it occurs in cell cultures at hormone concentrations compatible with ER transcriptional activation, is blocked by specific ER antagonists, and is linked to ER expression.11,12,23,24 In vitro transfection experiments show that ER is indispensable to E2 regulation of iNOS transcription. There is little evidence, however, for a direct interaction of estrogen with the iNOS promoter,25 which lacks canonical estrogen responsive elements. As proposed for the effect of estrogens on other molecules of the inflammatory cascade, it is conceivable that iNOS mRNA synthesis is controlled by ERs by interaction with transcription factors such as NF-
B, AP-1, or STATs.26,27 Paech et al28 reported that E2 has opposite influence on NF-
B and AP-1 transcription activity, depending on its association with ER
or ERß. Considering a differential effect of the two ER subtypes on iNOS expression, we propose that the altered ER
/ ERß ratio reported here for diabetic SMC, and in particular the remarkable upregulation of ERß, underlies the loss of E2 negative control on iNOS activity. ER
and ERß expression was increased in diabetic compared with control SMC, with a relative increase in ER
and ERß protein levels of
1.4- and 2.5-fold, respectively. Although no experiments were performed in this study to distinguish functionally between ER
and ERß, our findings suggest that the increased ERß expression was associated with the defective response to E2 and to cytokines observed in diabetes. Supporting this hypothesis are recent studies in ERß-deficient mice describing an important role for ERß in regulating vascular function and blood pressure.29 The authors showed that ERß is involved in estrogen-induced accumulation of iNOS protein in endothelium-denuded aortic rings as well as iNOS gene transcription in normal vessels. This lends further support to the view that the altered estrogenic control of iNOS function in diabetic SMC was mediated mainly by ERß.
The observation that ER
and ERß protein content was regulated by E2 in an opposite fashion in aortic SMC (Figures 5 and 6
) provides further evidence for the potential divergent effects of the two receptors.28,30 By upregulating ER
, E2 may enhance the protective antiinflammatory effects mediated by this receptor subtype in these cells while limiting potential proinflammatory effects with ERß downregulation. Interestingly, enhanced transcription of both ER subtypes occurred in diabetic cells, although the increase in protein level was more evident for ERß. It is conceivable that ER protein underwent translational regulation, as was the case for iNOS; this phenomenon has been reported to occur in diabetes.31,32 Accordingly, the cytokine-dependent synthesis of iNOS was delayed and significantly blunted in diabetic cells possibly due to altered levels of transcription factors or of intracellular signaling molecules such as intracellular Ca2+, as suggested by previous studies in SMC.33 The cytokine response itself was blunted but not abolished in diabetic SMC at the 24-hour time point. Therefore, the altered time course of iNOS response to cytokines and the corresponding loss of estrogenic effect on this phenomenon, along with the changes in the ER expression pattern, appeared to be part of diabetic vascular dysfunction in aortic SMC.
Activation of iNOS in SMC leads to rapid production of high amounts of NO, which causes pathological vasodilation. In addition, excess NO may interact with superoxide to generate peroxynitrite, which in turn modifies the function of several proteins, contributing to the tissue damage occurring in vascular sepsis and inflammation.18 Our results may partially explain why diabetes abolishes the gender-specific vascular protection afforded by estrogen reported in epidemiological studies.8 Thus, understanding the mechanism for the vascular alterations in estrogen response and ER levels in diabetes would be particularly relevant from a clinical perspective. Estrogen inhibits the iNOS activation associated with ovariectomy,19 uraemia,20 transplantation,21 and inflammatory stimuli.11,22 Estrogen also appears to be effective in clinical conditions sharing inflammatory features such as multiple sclerosis, Alzheimers disease, osteoporosis, and periodontitis, indicating that the beneficial effects of estrogen reflect its antiinflammatory action. In view of the possible role of ERß in the development of diabetic vascular dysfunction, it would be interesting to assess the role of ERß in other inflammatory disorders in which the hormone exerts protective effects. These studies might eventually lead to the development of novel drugs for prevention and treatment of inflammatory disease affecting the aging woman.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. De Vriese AS, Verbeuren TJ, Van de Voorde J, et al. Endothelial dysfunction in diabetes. Br J Pharmacol. 2000; 130: 963974.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Rubanyi GM, Vanhoutte PM. Superoxide anions and hyperoxia inactivate endothelium-derived relaxing factor. Am J Physiol. 1986; 250: H822H827.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Giugliano D, Ceriello A, Paolisso G. Oxidative stress and diabetic vascular complications. Diabetes Care. 1996; 19: 257267.[Abstract]
5. Beckman JS, Koppenol WH. Nitric oxide, superoxide, and peroxynitrite: the good, the bad, and ugly. Am J Physiol. 1996; 271: C1424C1437.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Bardell AL, MacLeod KM. Evidence for inducible nitric-oxide synthase expression and activity in vascular smooth muscle of streptozotocin-diabetic rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001; 296: 252259.
7. Bolego C, Cignarella A, Zancan V, et al. Diabetes abolishes the vascular protective effects of estrogen in female rats. Life Sci. 1999; 64: 741749.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Kannel WB, Wilson PW. Risk factors that attenuate the female coronary disease advantage. Arch Intern Med. 1995; 155: 5761.
9. Lindner V, Kim SK, Karas RH, et al. Increased expression of estrogen receptor-ß mRNA in male blood vessels after vascular injury. Circ Res. 1998; 83: 224229.
10. Karas RH, Patterson BL, Mendelsohn ME. Human vascular smooth muscle cells contain functional estrogen receptor. Circulation. 1994; 89: 19431950.
11. Zancan V, Santagati S, Bolego C, et al. 17ß-Estradiol decreases nitric oxide synthase II synthesis in vascular smooth muscle cells. Endocrinology. 1999; 140: 20042009.
12. Vegeto E, Pollio G, Pellicciari C, et al. Estrogen and progesterone induction of survival of monoblastoid cells undergoing TNF-alpha-induced apoptosis. FASEB J. 1999; 13: 793803.
13. Furchgott RF. Endothelium-derived relaxing factor: discovery, early studies, and identification as nitric oxide. Biosci Rep. 1999; 19: 235251.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Mendelsohn ME. Nongenomic E. R-mediated activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase: how does it work? What does it mean? Circ Res. 2000; 87: 956960.
15. Chen Z, Yuhanna IS, Galcheva-Gargova Z, et al. Estrogen receptor
mediates the nongenomic activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase by estrogen. J Clin Invest. 1999; 103: 401406.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Ross R. The smooth muscle cell, II: growth of smooth muscle in culture and formation of elastic fibers. J Cell Biol. 1971; 103: 27872796.[CrossRef]
17. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, et al. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951; 193: 265275.
18. Marshall HE, Merchant K, Stamler JS. Nitrosation and oxidation in the regulation of gene expression. FASEB J. 2000; 14: 18891900.
19. Tamura K, Yamaguchi K, Kogo H. 17ß-Estradiol inhibits ovariectomy-induced expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in rat aorta in vivo. Life Sci. 2000; 66: 259264.
20. Noris M, Todeschini M, Zappella S, et al. 17ß-Estradiol corrects hemostasis in uremic rats by limiting vascular expression of nitric oxide synthases. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2000; 279: F626F635.
21. Saito S, Aras RS, Lou H, et al. Effects of estrogen on nitric oxide synthase expression in rat aorta allograft and smooth muscle cells. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1999; 18: 937945.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Kauser K, Sonnenberg D, Diel P, et al. Effect of 17ß-oestradiol on cytokine-induced nitric oxide production in rat isolated aorta. Br J Pharmacol. 1998; 123: 10891096.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Cuzzocrea S, Santagati S, Sautebin L, et al. 17ß-Estradiol anti-inflammatory activity in carrageenan-induced pleurisy. Endocrinology. 2000; 141: 14551463.
24. Vegeto E, Bonincontro C, Pollio G, et al. Estrogen prevents the lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory response in microglia. J Neurosci. 2001; 21: 18091818.
25. Miller L, Alley EW, Murphy WJ, et al. Progesterone inhibits inducible nitric oxide synthase gene expression and nitric oxide production in murine macrophages. J Leukoc Biol. 1996; 59: 442450.[Abstract]
26. Xie QW, Kashiwabara Y, Nathan C. Role of transcription factor NF-kappa B/Rel in induction of nitric oxide synthase. J Biol Chem. 1994; 269: 47054708.
27. Faulds MH, Pettersson K, Gustafsson JÅ, et al. Cross-talk between ERs and signal transducers and activators of transcription 5 is E2 dependent and involves two functionally separate mechanisms. Mol Endocrinol. 2001; 15: 19291940.
28. Paech K, Webb P, Kuiper GG, et al. Differential ligand activation of estrogen receptors ERalpha and ERbeta at AP1 sites. Science. 1997; 277: 15081510.
29. Zhu Y, Bian Z, Lu P, et al. Abnormal vascular function and hypertension in mice deficient in estrogen receptor ß. Science. 2002; 295: 505508.
30. Weatherman RV, Scanlan TS. Unique protein determinants of the subtype-selective ligand responses of the estrogen receptors (ERalpha and ERbeta) at AP-1 sites. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 38273832.
31. Yu WJ, Juang SW, Chin WT, et al. Decrease of nitric oxide synthase in the cerebrocortex of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Neurosci Lett. 1999; 272: 99102.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Perreault M, Dombrowski L, Marette A. Mechanism of impaired nitric oxide synthase activity in skeletal muscle of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Diabetologia. 2000; 43: 427437.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Muniyappa R, Srinivas PR, Ram JL, et al. Calcium and protein kinase C mediate high-glucose-induced inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase in vascular smooth muscle cells. Hypertension. 1998; 31: 289295.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Cignarella, C. Bolego, V. Pelosi, C. Meda, A. Krust, C. Pinna, R. M. Gaion, E. Vegeto, and A. Maggi Distinct Roles of Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} and {beta} in the Modulation of Vascular Inducible Nitric-Oxide Synthase in Diabetes J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2009; 328(1): 174 - 182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Pinna, C. Bolego, P. Sanvito, V. Pelosi, R. Baetta, A. Corsini, R. M. Gaion, and A. Cignarella Raloxifene Elicits Combined Rapid Vasorelaxation and Long-Term Anti-Inflammatory Actions in Rat Aorta J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2006; 319(3): 1444 - 1451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bolego, E. Vegeto, C. Pinna, A. Maggi, and A. Cignarella Selective Agonists of Estrogen Receptor Isoforms: New Perspectives for Cardiovascular Disease Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2006; 26(10): 2192 - 2199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Christian, P. Y. Liu, S. Harrington, M. Ruan, V. M. Miller, and L. A. Fitzpatrick Intimal Estrogen Receptor (ER){beta}, But Not ER{alpha} Expression, Is Correlated with Coronary Calcification and Atherosclerosis in Pre- and Postmenopausal Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2006; 91(7): 2713 - 2720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bolego, A. Cignarella, P. Sanvito, V. Pelosi, F. Pellegatta, L. Puglisi, and C. Pinna The Acute Estrogenic Dilation of Rat Aorta Is Mediated Solely by Selective Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} Agonists and Is Abolished by Estrogen Deprivation J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2005; 313(3): 1203 - 1208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Y. Liu, R. C. Christian, M. Ruan, V. M. Miller, and L. A. Fitzpatrick Correlating Androgen and Estrogen Steroid Receptor Expression with Coronary Calcification and Atherosclerosis in Men without Known Coronary Artery Disease J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2005; 90(2): 1041 - 1046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Barchiesi, E. K. Jackson, B. Imthurn, J. Fingerle, D. G. Gillespie, and R. K. Dubey Differential Regulation of Estrogen Receptor Subtypes {alpha} and {beta} in Human Aortic Smooth Muscle Cells by Oligonucleotides and Estradiol J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2004; 89(5): 2373 - 2381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |