Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2003;108:2308-2311
Published online before print November 3, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000101683.30157.0B
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
108/19/2308    most recent
01.CIR.0000101683.30157.0Bv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hermann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ruschitzka, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hermann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ruschitzka, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other hypertension
Right arrow Oxidant stress
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide
Right arrow Other arteriosclerosis

(Circulation. 2003;108:2308.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Brief Rapid Communications

Differential Effects of Selective Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors on Endothelial Function in Salt-Induced Hypertension

Matthias Hermann, MD; Giovanni Camici, BSc; Aisha Fratton, BSc; David Hurlimann, MD; Felix C. Tanner, MD; Jens P. Hellermann, MD, MSc; Martin Fiedler, MD; Joachim Thiery, MD; Michel Neidhart, PhD; Renate E. Gay, MD; Steffen Gay, MD; Thomas F. Lüscher, MD; Frank Ruschitzka, MD

From Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital Zürich, the Institute of Physiology, University of Zürich-Irchel (M.H., G.C., A.F., F.C.T., J.P.H., T.F.L., F.R.), and the Center for Experimental Rheumatology, University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland (M.N., R.G., S.G.); and the Institute of Clinical Chemistry, University of Leipzig, Germany (M.F., J.T.).

Correspondence to Frank Ruschitzka, MD, FESC, Cardiology, University Hospital Zürich, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland. E-mail frank.ruschitzka{at}usz.ch

Received August 4, 2003; revision received September 19, 2003; accepted September 22, 2003.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— In view of the ongoing controversy about potential differences in cardiovascular safety of selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors (coxibs), we compared the effects of 2 different coxibs and a traditional NSAID on endothelial dysfunction, a well-established surrogate of cardiovascular disease, in salt-induced hypertension.

Methods and Results— Salt-sensitive (DS) and salt-resistant (DR) Dahl rats were fed a high-sodium diet (4% NaCl) for 56 days. From days 35 to 56, diclofenac (6 mg · kg-1 · d-1; DS-diclofenac), rofecoxib (2 mg · kg-1 · d-1; DS-rofecoxib), celecoxib (25 mg · kg-1 · d-1; DS-celecoxib) or placebo (DS-placebo) was added to the chow. Blood pressure increased with sodium diet in the DS groups, which was more pronounced after diclofenac and rofecoxib treatment (P<0.005 versus DS-placebo) but was slightly decreased by celecoxib (P<0.001 versus DS-placebo). Sodium diet markedly reduced NO-mediated endothelium-dependent relaxations to acetylcholine (10-10-10-5 mol/L) in aortic rings of untreated hypertensive rats (P<0.005 versus DR-placebo). Relaxation to acetylcholine improved after celecoxib (P<0.005 versus DS-placebo and DS-rofecoxib) but remained unchanged after rofecoxib and diclofenac treatment. Vasoconstriction after nitric oxide synthase inhibition, indicating basal NO release, with N{omega}-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (10-4 mol/L) was blunted in DS rats (P<0.05 versus DR-placebo), normalized by celecoxib, but not affected by rofecoxib or diclofenac. Indicators of oxidative stress, 8-isoprostane levels, were elevated in untreated DS rats on 4% NaCl (6.55±0.58 versus 3.65±1.05 ng/mL, P<0.05) and normalized by celecoxib only (4.29±0.58 ng/mL).

Conclusions— These data show that celecoxib but not rofecoxib or diclofenac improves endothelial dysfunction and reduces oxidative stress, thus pointing to differential effects of coxibs in salt-induced hypertension.


Key Words: endothelium • drugs, antiinflammatory • hypertension • nitric oxide • stress


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
There is concern that the gastrointestinal safety of coxibs may come at the cost of increased cardiovascular complications, because selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibition reduces prostaglandin I2 formation without inhibiting platelet derived thromboxane A2, with a resultant possibility for thrombosis and ischemic events.1–4 The cardiovascular safety of coxibs is an important public health issue, in view of the large number of predominantly elderly patients with osteoarthritis presenting with a relatively high incidence of cardiovascular comorbidity, hypertension in particular.

Novel therapeutical strategies in hypertension aim at reversing endothelial dysfunction, which has been implicated in the pathogenesis and clinical course of hypertension and its cardiovascular complications.5 COX-2 inhibition may represent a novel therapeutical approach, because COX-2 expression is increased at sites of inflammatory responses of the vessel wall6 and production of vasoconstrictor cyclooxygenase products, particularly reactive oxygen species (ROS), contributes to the development of endothelial dysfunction in hypertension.2,7

Thus, the present study investigated the effects of 2 different coxibs compared with a traditional NSAID on vascular function and oxidative stress in an experimental model of hypertension.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Animals
All male salt-sensitive (DS) and salt-resistant (DR) Dahl rats (11 weeks of age, mean weight 330 g; M&B, Ry, Denmark) were fed a high-sodium diet (4% NaCl) for 8 weeks. For the last 3 weeks, all DS rats were randomly assigned to receive either diclofenac (6 mg · kg-1 · d-1; DS-diclofenac, n=8), rofecoxib (2 mg · kg-1 · d-1; DS-rofecoxib, n=8), celecoxib (25 mg · kg-1 · d-1; DS-celecoxib, n=6), or placebo (DS-placebo, n=8), whereas DR rats received placebo (DR-placebo, n=8) in addition to the high-sodium diet. In the present study, dosage was calculated based on data from recent publications and took into account the differences in half life between the compunds.8 Food and drug intake were calculated daily. Systolic blood pressure and heart rate were measured by the tail-cuff method. Study design and experimetal protocols were approved by the institutional animal care committee (Kommission für Tierversuche des Kantons Zürich, Switzerland) and are in accordance with the American Heart Association guidelines for research animal use.

Tissue Harvesting and Organ Chamber Experiments
Animals were anesthetized after 8 weeks before 10 mL of blood was drawn to exsanguinate the animals. Aortic rings were used for the assessment of endothelial function by their response to acetylcholine, sodium nitroprusside, superoxide dismutase (SOD), and N{omega}-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester.9 Some aortic rings were used for Western blot analysis.

Prostanoids and 8-Isoprostane Plasma Levels
Prostaglandins were measured as recently described.10 8-Isoprostanes were analyzed with enzymeimmunoassay (Cayman Chemical).

Immunoblotting and Cytokine Assay
Western blotting was performed with appropriate antibodies.9 Cytokines were measured by the cytometry-based Luminex system.10a

Calculations and Statistical Analysis
Data are given as mean±SEM, and n indicates the number of animals. Relaxation, contraction, negative logarithm of the concentration causing half-maximal relaxation (pD2 value), and area under the curve were determined for each individual dose-response curve by nonlinear regression analysis with MatLab software. For multiple comparisons, ANOVA followed by unpaired Student’s t test was used. A value of P<0.05 was considered significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Systolic Blood Pressure and Heart Rate
After 8 weeks of high-sodium diet, the blood pressure increase in DS animals was more pronounced with rofecoxib and diclofenac treatment (P<0.005 versus DS-placebo) but was reduced after celecoxib (P<0.001 versus DS-placebo) (Table).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Differences Among Groups

Alterations of the Vascular NO System
In aortic rings of hypertensive DS-placebo rats, acetylcholine-induced relaxation was blunted compared with normotensive DR animals (P<0.005 versus DR-placebo). Endothelium-dependent relaxation was improved by celecoxib (P<0.005 versus DS-placebo and DS-rofecoxib) but remained unchanged after treatment with rofecoxib or diclofenac (Figure).



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
A, Endothelium-dependent acetylcholine-induced vasorelaxation. Acetylcholine-induced relaxation was blunted compared with normotensive DR animals (P<0.005 vs DR-placebo). Endothelium-dependent relaxation was improved by celecoxib (*P<0.005 vs DS-placebo and DS-rofecoxib) but remained unchanged after treatment with rofecoxib or diclofenac (n=6 to 8 animals in all groups). NE indicates norepinephrine. B, 8-Isoprostane plasma levels were increased in DS-placebo, DS-diclofenac, and DS-rofecoxib (P<0.05 vs DR-placebo). Celecoxib decreased 8-isoprostane levels ({dagger}P<0.05 vs DS-placebo and DS-rofecoxib) (n=6 to 8 animals in all groups).

N{omega}-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (10-4 mol/L)–induced vasoconstriction, reflecting basal NO release, was diminished in aortic rings of hypertensive animals (P<0.05 for DS-placebo, DS-diclofenac, and DS-rofecoxib versus DR-placebo) and was normalized by celecoxib (Table).

Expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase protein was decreased in DS-placebo (P<0.05 versus DR-placebo) but tended to increase in the DS-celecoxib group (P=0.088 versus DS-placebo) (Table).

Parameters of Oxidative Stress and Prostaglandins
Vasorelaxation to SOD was attenuated in hypertensive DS-placebo rats (P<0.001 versus DR-placebo) and improved by celecoxib (P<0.05 versus DS-rofecoxib and DS-diclofenac) (Table).

MnSOD and COX-2 protein expression in the aorta was not affected by high-salt diet or any treatment (data not shown).

8-Isoprostane plasma levels were increased in DS-placebo, DS-diclofenac, and DS-rofecoxib (P<0.05 versus DR-placebo) and decreased in the DS-celecoxib group (P<0.05 versus DS-placebo and DS-rofecoxib) (Figure). Prostaglandin E2, prostacyclin, and thromboxane B2 plasma levels did not change between all groups (Table).

Cytokine Plasma Levels
Interleukin-1ß increased in the DS-placebo group (P=0.054 versus DR-placebo) and was significantly reduced in the DS-celecoxib group (P=0.04 versus DS-placebo) (Table).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The present head-to-head comparison of selective and nonselective COX inhibitors is, to the best of our knowledge, the first study to show differential effects of coxibs on vascular function. Interestingly, celecoxib but not rofecoxib and diclofenac improved endothelial dysfunction and reduced oxidative stress in this experimental model of hypertension.

NO is the key endothelium-derived relaxing factor that plays a pivotal role in the maintenance of vascular tone and structure.11 In the present study, endothelial nitric oxide synthase protein expression and basal and stimulated release of NO were blunted in hypertensive animals, thus pointing to decreased NO bioavailability, consistent with previous studies in experimental hypertension.12 In addition, increased isoprostane plasma levels and the attenuated relaxation to superoxide-scavenging SOD are in line with previous observations that increased oxidative stress accounts in large part for endothelial dysfunction in hypertension.12 Cyclooxygenases, particularly the COX-2 pathway, may contribute to the production of ROS and vasoconstrictor prostanoids and in turn to the pathogenesis of endothelial dysfunction.13 However, the net effect of COX-2 inhibition on endothelial dysfunction before this study remained elusive, because coxibs may potentially reduce prostacyclin generation and leave COX-1–mediated thromboxane production unopposed.1 Intriguingly, endothelial dysfunction was improved only by celecoxib under the conditions of the present study, whereas rofecoxib and diclofenac had no effect, and plasma prostaglandin levels remained unchanged. The improvement of endothelial function by celecoxib was paralleled by increased vasorelaxation to SOD and reduced plasma levels of 8-isoprostane, both indicating that this coxib specifically reduced oxidative stress. This is in accordance with recent reports showing that rofecoxib14 and diclofenac15 did not reduce superoxide production in lead-treated aortic rings or SOD-dependent vasorelaxation in normotensive rabbit mesenteric resistance arteries, respectively. The results of the present study extend previous reports demonstrating improved endothelial function after treatment with the selective COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib in patients with coronary artery disease and hypertension.10,16 The beneficial effects on endothelial function in the former study were accompanied by a reduction of markers for oxidative stress and low-grade chronic inflammation, which is consistent with reduced 8-isoprostanes and interleukin-1ß levels in the present study. Because interleukin-1ß dose-dependently induces endothelial dysfunction17 and upregulates COX-2 expression in vascular smooth muscle cells,18 the results of the present study suggest that celecoxib reduces the production of inflammatory cytokines and ROS, thus contributing to an improvement of endothelial function.

Rofecoxib, however, did not affect endothelial function under the conditions and doses used in the present study, suggesting that COX-2–independent effects may be involved. It should be noted that although both drugs selectively inhibit COX-2, they are chemically different compounds. Celecoxib, as a sulfonamide, is more extensively distributed into tissues than the sulfone rofecoxib. In addition to the differences in half-lifes of rofecoxib and celecoxib, this may result in variations of the degree of COX-2 versus COX-1 inhibition or in additional effects unrelated to COX-2 inhibition at the tissue level, in particular the oxidation of membrane proteins.2 Whether different, in particular higher, doses of rofecoxib and diclofenac would have elicited more beneficial effects under the conditions of the present study remains elusive. However, because 50 mg of rofecoxib was associated with an increased cardiovascular event rate in the TennCare study,4 this seems unlikely. Although dosing cannot be ruled out as an explanation for some of the apparent discrepancies regarding cardiovascular safety of the currently available coxibs,2,4 the results of the present study suggest differences within this class of drugs. Whether these differential effects of coxibs are of clinical significance remains to be determined in well-designed large-scale head-to-head comparative clinical trials that will provide the answer as to the net effect of selective COX-2 inhibition on cardiovascular events.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Swiss National Research Foundation (grants 32-57225.99 to Dr Ruschitzka and 32-51069.97 to Dr Lüscher).


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. McAdam BF, Catella-Lawson F, Mardini IA, et al. Systemic biosynthesis of prostacyclin by cyclooxygenase (COX)-2: the human pharmacology of a selective inhibitor of COX-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96: 272–277.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Pitt B, Pepine C, Willerson JT. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition and cardiovascular events. Circulation. 2002; 106: 167–169.[Free Full Text]
  3. Strand V, Hochberg MC. The risk of cardiovascular thrombotic events with selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors. Arthritis Rheum. 2002; 47: 349–355.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Ray WA, Stein CM, Daugherty JR, et al. COX-2 selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of serious coronary heart disease. Lancet. 2002; 360: 1071–1073.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Perticone F, Ceravolo R, Pujia A, et al. Prognostic significance of endothelial dysfunction in hypertensive patients. Circulation. 2001; 104: 191–196.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Schonbeck U, Sukhova GK, Graber P, et al. Augmented expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in human atherosclerotic lesions. Am J Pathol. 1999; 155: 1281–1291.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Taddei S, Virdis A, Ghiadoni L, et al. Vitamin C improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation by restoring nitric oxide activity in essential hypertension. Circulation. 1998; 97: 2222–2229.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Kitahara M, Eitner F, Ostendorf T, et al. Selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition impairs glomerular capillary healing in experimental glomerulonephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002; 13: 1261–1270.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Ruschitzka F, Quaschning T, Noll G, et al. Endothelin 1 type A receptor antagonism prevents vascular dysfunction and hypertension induced by 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase inhibition: role of nitric oxide. Circulation. 2001; 103: 3129–3135.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Chenevard R, Hurlimann D, Bechir M, et al. Selective COX-2 inhibition improves endothelial function in coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2003; 107: 405–409.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. de Jager W, te Velthuis H, Prakken BJ, et al. Simultaneous detection of 15 human cytokines in a single sample of stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2003; 10: 133–139.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Loscalzo J. Nitric oxide and vascular disease. N Engl J Med. 1995; 333: 251–253.[Free Full Text]
  13. Somers MJ, Mavromatis K, Galis ZS, et al. Vascular superoxide production and vasomotor function in hypertension induced by deoxycorticosterone acetate-salt. Circulation. 2000; 101: 1722–1728.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Armstead WM. Cyclooxygenase-2-dependent superoxide generation contributes to age-dependent impairment of G protein-mediated cerebrovasodilation. Anesthesiology. 2003; 98: 1378–1383.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Courtois E, Marques M, Barrientos A, et al. Lead-induced downregulation of soluble guanylate cyclase in isolated rat aortic segments mediated by reactive oxygen species and cyclooxygenase-2. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003; 14: 1464–1470.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Itoh T, Kajikuri J, Hattori T, et al. Involvement of H2O2 in superoxide-dismutase-induced enhancement of endothelium-dependent relaxation in rabbit mesenteric resistance artery. Br J Pharmacol. 2003; 139: 444–456.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Widlansky ME, Price DT, Gokce N, et al. Short- and long-term COX-2 inhibition reverses endothelial dysfunction in patients with hypertension. Hypertension. 2003; 42: 310–315.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Loughrey JP, Laffey JG, Moore BJ, et al. Interleukin-1 beta rapidly inhibits aortic endothelium-dependent relaxation by a DNA transcription-dependent mechanism. Crit Care Med. 2003; 31: 910–915.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Bradbury DA, Newton R, Zhu YM, et al. Effect of bradykinin, TGF-ß1, IL-1ß, and hypoxia on COX-2 expression in pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol. 2002; 283: L717–L725.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular DiseaseHome page
A. Aneja and M. E. Farkouh
Review: Adverse cardiovascular effects of NSAIDs: driven by blood pressure, or edema?
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, February 1, 2008; 2(1): 53 - 66.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. P. Joshi, R. Gertler, and R. Fricker
Cardiovascular Thromboembolic Adverse Effects Associated with Cyclooxygenase-2 Selective Inhibitors and Nonselective Antiinflammatory Drugs
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2007; 105(6): 1793 - 1804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
T. Klein, M. Eltze, T. Grebe, A. Hatzelmann, and M. Komhoff
Celecoxib dilates guinea-pig coronaries and rat aortic rings and amplifies NO/cGMP signaling by PDE5 inhibition
Cardiovasc Res, July 15, 2007; 75(2): 390 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
W. B. White
Cardiovascular Effects of the Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors
Hypertension, March 1, 2007; 49(3): 408 - 418.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. Hermann and F. Ruschitzka
Novel anti-inflammatory drugs in hypertension
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 859 - 864.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
N. E. Taylor and A. W. Cowley Jr.
Effect of renal medullary H2O2 on salt-induced hypertension and renal injury
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2005; 289(6): R1573 - R1579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Hermann, H. Krum, and F. Ruschitzka
To the Heart of the Matter: Coxibs, Smoking, and Cardiovascular Risk
Circulation, August 16, 2005; 112(7): 941 - 945.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. Wu, M.-A. Laplante, and J. de Champlain
Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors Attenuate Angiotensin II-Induced Oxidative Stress, Hypertension, and Cardiac Hypertrophy in Rats
Hypertension, June 1, 2005; 45(6): 1139 - 1144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Steffel, M. Hermann, H. Greutert, S. Gay, T. F. Luscher, F. Ruschitzka, and F. C. Tanner
Celecoxib Decreases Endothelial Tissue Factor Expression Through Inhibition of c-Jun Terminal NH2 Kinase Phosphorylation
Circulation, April 5, 2005; 111(13): 1685 - 1689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
S. E. Kimmel, J. A. Berlin, M. Reilly, J. Jaskowiak, L. Kishel, J. Chittams, and B. L. Strom
Patients Exposed to Rofecoxib and Celecoxib Have Different Odds of Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction
Ann Intern Med, February 1, 2005; 142(3): 157 - 164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. Finckh and M. D. Aronson
Cardiovascular Risks of Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: Where We Stand Now
Ann Intern Med, February 1, 2005; 142(3): 212 - 214.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
I. J. Chang and R. C. Harris
Are All COX-2 Inhibitors Created Equal?
Hypertension, February 1, 2005; 45(2): 178 - 180.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. Hermann, S. Shaw, E. Kiss, G. Camici, N. Buhler, R. Chenevard, T. F. Luscher, H. J. Grone, and F. Ruschitzka
Selective COX-2 Inhibitors and Renal Injury in Salt-Sensitive Hypertension
Hypertension, February 1, 2005; 45(2): 193 - 197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
I. N. Bratz and N. L. Kanagy
Nitric oxide synthase-inhibition hypertension is associated with altered endothelial cyclooxygenase function
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): H2394 - H2401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
D. H. Solomon, S. Schneeweiss, R. Levin, and J. Avorn
Relationship Between COX-2 Specific Inhibitors and Hypertension
Hypertension, August 1, 2004; 44(2): 140 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
P. E. Gates, H. Tanaka, W. R. Hiatt, and D. R. Seals
Dietary Sodium Restriction Rapidly Improves Large Elastic Artery Compliance in Older Adults With Systolic Hypertension
Hypertension, July 1, 2004; 44(1): 35 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. H. Solomon, S. Schneeweiss, R. J. Glynn, Y. Kiyota, R. Levin, H. Mogun, and J. Avorn
Relationship Between Selective Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors and Acute Myocardial Infarction in Older Adults
Circulation, May 4, 2004; 109(17): 2068 - 2073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
108/19/2308    most recent
01.CIR.0000101683.30157.0Bv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hermann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ruschitzka, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hermann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ruschitzka, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other hypertension
Right arrow Oxidant stress
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide
Right arrow Other arteriosclerosis