This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Naghavi, M. Articles by Willerson, J. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Naghavi, M. Articles by Willerson, J. T.

(Circulation. 2003;108:1772.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.

Review: Current Perspective

From Vulnerable Plaque to Vulnerable Patient

A Call for New Definitions and Risk Assessment Strategies: Part II

Morteza Naghavi, MD; Peter Libby, MD; Erling Falk, MD, PhD; S. Ward Casscells, MD; Silvio Litovsky, MD; John Rumberger, MD; Juan Jose Badimon, PhD; Christodoulos Stefanadis, MD; Pedro Moreno, MD; Gerard Pasterkamp, MD, PhD; Zahi Fayad, PhD; Peter H. Stone, MD; Sergio Waxman, MD; Paolo Raggi, MD; Mohammad Madjid, MD; Alireza Zarrabi, MD; Allen Burke, MD; Chun Yuan, PhD; Peter J. Fitzgerald, MD, PhD; David S. Siscovick, MD; Chris L. de Korte, PhD; Masanori Aikawa, MD, PhD; K. E. Juhani Airaksinen, MD; Gerd Assmann, MD; Christoph R. Becker, MD; James H. Chesebro, MD; Andrew Farb, MD; Zorina S. Galis, PhD; Chris Jackson, PhD; Ik-Kyung Jang, MD, PhD; Wolfgang Koenig, MD, PhD; Robert A. Lodder, PhD; Keith March, MD, PhD; Jasenka Demirovic, MD, PhD; Mohamad Navab, PhD; Silvia G. Priori, MD, PhD; Mark D. Rekhter, PhD; Raymond Bahr, MD; Scott M. Grundy, MD, PhD; Roxana Mehran, MD; Antonio Colombo, MD; Eric Boerwinkle, PhD; Christie Ballantyne, MD; William Insull, Jr, MD; Robert S. Schwartz, MD; Robert Vogel, MD; Patrick W. Serruys, MD, PhD; Goran K. Hansson, MD, PhD; David P. Faxon, MD; Sanjay Kaul, MD; Helmut Drexler, MD; Philip Greenland, MD; James E. Muller, MD; Renu Virmani, MD; Paul M Ridker, MD; Douglas P. Zipes, MD; Prediman K. Shah, MD; James T. Willerson, MD

From The Center for Vulnerable Plaque Research, University of Texas—Houston, The Texas Heart Institute, and President Bush Center for Cardiovascular Health, Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (M. Naghavi, S.W.C., S.L., M.M., A.Z., J.T.W.); The Leducq Center for Cardiovascular Research, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (P.L., M.A.); Department of Cardiology and Institute of Experimental Clinical Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark (E.F.); Experimental Cardiology Laboratory, Vascular Biology of the University Medical Center in Utrecht, the Netherlands (G.P.); Ohio State University (J.R.); the Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY (Z.F.); Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory at the VA Medical Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington (P.M.); Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (P.H.S.); Division of Cardiology, New England Medical Center, Boston, Mass (S.W.); Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (P.R.); Department of Cardiovascular Pathology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC (A.B., A.F., R.V.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle (C.Y.); Stanford University Medical Center Stanford, Calif (P.J.F.); Cardiovascular Health Research Unit, University of Washington, Seattle (D.S.S.); Department of Cardiology, Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece (C.S.); Catheterization Laboratory, Thorax Center, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (C.L.d.K.); Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Turku, Finland (K.E.J.A.); Institute of Arteriosclerosis Research and the Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Central Laboratory, Hospital of the University of Münster, Munich, Germany (G.A.); Department of Clinical Radiology, University of Münster, Munich, Germany (C.R.B.); Mayo Clinic Medical School, Jacksonville, Fla (J.H.C.); Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (Z.S.G.); Bristol Heart Institute, Bristol University, Bristol, United Kingdom (C.J.); Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (I.-K.J.); Department of Internal Medicine II, Cardiology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany (W.K.); University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky (R.A.L.); R.L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Ind (K.M.); School of Public Health, University of Texas—Houston, Houston, Texas (J.D.); Division of Cardiology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (M. Navab); Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy (S.G.P.); Department of Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Pfizer Global Research and Development, Ann Arbor Laboratories, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.D.R.); Paul Dudley White Coronary Care System at St. Agnes HealthCare, Baltimore, Md (R.B.); Center for Human Nutrition, University of Texas Health Science Center, Dallas (S.M.G.); Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY (R.M.); Catheterization Laboratories, Ospedale San Raffaele and Emo Centro Cuore Columbus, Milan, Italy (A.C.); Human Genetics Center, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Houston, Tex (E.B.); Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (C.B., W.I.); Minneapolis Heart Institute and Foundation, Minneapolis, Minn (R.S.S.); Division of Cardiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (R.V.); Karolinska Institute, Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (G.K.H.); Section of Cardiology, University of Chicago, Ill (D.P.F.); Vascular Physiology and Thrombosis Research Laboratory of the Atherosclerosis Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.K.); Cardiology Department, Hannover University, Hannover, Germany (H.D.); Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (P.G.); UCLA School of Medicine and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif (P.K.S.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School and CIMIT (Center for Integration of Medicine and Innovative Technology), Boston, Mass (J.E.M.); Cardiovascular Division, Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass (P.M.R.); and Indiana University School of Medicine, Krannert Institute of Cardiology, Indianapolis (D.P.Z.).

Correspondence to Morteza Naghavi, MD, Association for Eradication of Heart Attack, P.O. Box 20345, Houston, TX 77225-0345. E-mail mn{at}vp.org

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Vulnerable (Thrombogenic) Blood Coagulation/Anticoagulation... Vulnerable Myocardium Risk Assessment for Vulnerable... New Risk Assessment Strategies References

 
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease results in >19 million deaths annually, and coronary heart disease accounts for the majority of this toll. Despite major advances in treatment of coronary heart disease patients, a large number of victims of the disease who are apparently healthy die suddenly without prior symptoms. Available screening and diagnostic methods are insufficient to identify the victims before the event occurs. The recognition of the role of the vulnerable plaque has opened new avenues of opportunity in the field of cardiovascular medicine. This consensus document concludes the following. (1) Rupture-prone plaques are not the only vulnerable plaques. All types of atherosclerotic plaques with high likelihood of thrombotic complications and rapid progression should be considered as vulnerable plaques. We propose a classification for clinical as well as pathological evaluation of vulnerable plaques. (2) Vulnerable plaques are not the only culprit factors for the development of acute coronary syndromes, myocardial infarction, and sudden cardiac death. Vulnerable blood (prone to thrombosis) and vulnerable myocardium (prone to fatal arrhythmia) play an important role in the outcome. Therefore, the term "vulnerable patient" may be more appropriate and is proposed now for the identification of subjects with high likelihood of developing cardiac events in the near future. (3) A quantitative method for cumulative risk assessment of vulnerable patients needs to be developed that may include variables based on plaque, blood, and myocardial vulnerability. In Part I of this consensus document, we cover the new definition of vulnerable plaque and its relationship with vulnerable patients. Part II of this consensus document will focus on vulnerable blood and vulnerable myocardium and provide an outline of overall risk assessment of vulnerable patients. Parts I and II are meant to provide a general consensus and overviews the new field of vulnerable patient. Recently developed assays (eg, C-reactive protein), imaging techniques (eg, CT and MRI), noninvasive electrophysiological tests (for vulnerable myocardium), and emerging catheters (to localize and characterize vulnerable plaque) in combination with future genomic and proteomic techniques will guide us in the search for vulnerable patients. It will also lead to the development and deployment of new therapies and ultimately to reduce the incidence of acute coronary syndromes and sudden cardiac death. We encourage healthcare policy makers to promote translational research for screening and treatment of vulnerable patients.

Key Words: coronary disease • plaque • myocardial infarction • atherosclerosis • death, sudden

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Vulnerable (Thrombogenic) Blood Coagulation/Anticoagulation... Vulnerable Myocardium Risk Assessment for Vulnerable... New Risk Assessment Strategies References

 
In Part I of this consensus document, we have introduced the concept of vulnerable patient as defined by plaque, blood, and myocardial vulnerability. Vulnerable plaque was extensively discussed in Part I. Here we discuss the definition of vulnerable blood and vulnerable myocardium and present an outline for overall risk assessment of vulnerable patients.

	Vulnerable (Thrombogenic) Blood

Top Abstract Introduction Vulnerable (Thrombogenic) Blood Coagulation/Anticoagulation... Vulnerable Myocardium Risk Assessment for Vulnerable... New Risk Assessment Strategies References

 
Serum Markers of Atherosclerosis and Inflammation
Serum markers may predict a patient’s risk of acute cardiovascular complications (Table 1). C-reactive protein (CRP) is an independent risk factor and a powerful predictor of future coronary events in the asymptomatic population^1–3 and in patients with stable and unstable disease. Although CRP is a nonspecific marker of systemic inflammation, it activates endothelium and accumulates in the plaque, suggesting an important role in plaque inflammation.^4,5

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 1. Serological Markers of Vulnerability (Reflecting Metabolic and Immune Disorders)

Circulating interleukin-6 levels, which are elevated in patients with acute coronary syndromes, also predict the risk of future coronary events in such patients.⁶ Recently, investigators have shown that high plasma concentrations of soluble CD40 ligand may indicate an increased vascular risk in apparently healthy women.⁷ Likewise, Hwang et al⁸ showed in a large population-based sample of individuals that circulating levels of soluble intracellular adhesion molecule were predictive of future acute coronary events.

Markers of systemic inflammation, such as soluble adhesion molecules, circulating bacterial endotoxin, soluble human heat-shock protein 60, and antibodies to mycobacterial heat-shock protein 65, may predict an increased risk of atherosclerosis.⁹ Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) is present in unstable plaques, and its circulating levels are elevated in patients with acute coronary syndromes.¹⁰ Increased serum levels of PAPP-A may reflect instability of atherosclerotic plaques.¹¹

With major advances in high-throughput genomics and proteomics research, future studies will undoubtedly identify new risk and protective factors and biomarkers that can be used for screening purposes. A recent study suggested an association between several genetic polymorphisms and clinical outcomes, some of which can be possibly related to plaque, blood, and myocardial vulnerability.¹² The tools and knowledge base made possible by the Human Genome Project allow the field to move beyond one or a few single-nucleotide polymorphisms in a priori candidate genes. Genome-wide linkage analyses have been carried out for coronary artery calcification,¹³ and genome-wide association studies for myocardial infarction are already a reality.¹⁴ Further studies are needed to address the relationship between single-nucleotide polymorphisms in components of each of the plaque, blood, and myocardial vulnerabilities and future outcomes (acute coronary syndromes and sudden cardiac death). However, ongoing proteomic research on serum samples of vulnerable patients collected from prospective studies before the onset of symptoms is most promising.

	Coagulation/Anticoagulation System

Top Abstract Introduction Vulnerable (Thrombogenic) Blood Coagulation/Anticoagulation... Vulnerable Myocardium Risk Assessment for Vulnerable... New Risk Assessment Strategies References

 
The importance of the coagulation system in the outcome of plaque complications was recently reemphasized by Karnicki et al,¹⁵ who in a porcine model demonstrated that the role assigned to lesion-bound tissue factor was not physically realistic and that blood borne factors must have a major role in thrombus propagation. A hematologic disorder is rarely the sole cause of coronary thrombosis and myocardial infarction. Inflammation promotes thrombosis and vice versa.¹⁶ Extensive atherosclerosis may be associated with increased blood thrombogenicity, but the magnitude of thrombogenicity varies from patient to patient, and unstable plaques are much more thrombogenic than stable ones (Table 2).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 2. Blood Markers of Vulnerability (Reflecting Hypercoagulability)

Some platelet polymorphisms, such as glycoprotein IIIa P1(A2),¹⁷ Ib gene-5T/C Kozak,¹⁸ high factor V and factor VII clotting,¹⁹ have been reported as independent risk factors for myocardial infarction. Reiner et al²⁰ recently reviewed the associations of known and potential genetic susceptibility markers for intermediate hemostatic phenotypes with arterial thrombotic disease.

Other conditions that lead to a hypercoagulable state are diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and cigarette smoking. High levels of circulating tissue factor may be the mechanism of action responsible for the increased thrombotic complications associated with the presence of these cardiovascular risk factors.²¹ Acute coronary syndromes are associated with proinflammatory and prothrombotic conditions that involve a prolonged increase in the levels of fibrinogen, CRP, and plasminogen activator inhibitor.^22,23

A number of blood abnormalities, including antithrombin III deficiency, protein C or S deficiency, and resistance to activated protein C (also known as factor V Leiden), have been implicated as causes of venous thrombosis. The risk of arterial thrombosis is only modestly increased in these conditions, but these abnormalities are thought to interact with traditional risk factors for arterial thrombosis.

Venous and arterial thromboses are prominent features of the antiphospholipid syndrome.^24,25 The main antibodies of this syndrome are the anticardiolipin antibody, the lupus anticoagulant, and the IgG antibodies against prothrombin and ß₂-glycoprotein.^24,25

In the nephrotic syndrome, proteinuria results in abnormal concentration and activity of coagulation factors. Moreover, the associated hypoalbuminemia, thrombocytosis, and hypercholesterolemia may induce arterial and venous thrombosis.²⁶

The importance of the coagulation/fibrinolytic system is highlighted by several autopsy studies that have shown a high prevalence of old plaque disruptions without infarctions. Therefore, an active fibrinolytic system may be able to prevent luminal thrombosis in some cases of plaque disruption.^27,28

A transient shift in the coagulation and anticoagulation balance is likely to be an important factor in plaque-blood interaction, resulting in an acute event. "Triggers" such as exercise and smoking, which are associated with catecholamine release, may increase the risk of plaque thrombosis.²⁹ Similarly, metabolic factors, such as postprandial metabolic changes, are associated with increased blood coagulability.³⁰ Likewise, estrogen replacement therapy can lead to a hypercoagulable state.³¹

Finally, plasma viscosity, as well as fibrinogen and white blood cell counts, is positively associated with CHD events as shown by Koenig et al.³² Furthermore, Junker et al³³ showed a positive relationship between plasma viscosity and the severity of coronary heart disease (CHD).

	Vulnerable Myocardium

Top Abstract Introduction Vulnerable (Thrombogenic) Blood Coagulation/Anticoagulation... Vulnerable Myocardium Risk Assessment for Vulnerable... New Risk Assessment Strategies References

 
Ischemic Vulnerable Myocardium Without Prior Atherosclerosis-Derived Myocardial Damage
Abrupt occlusion of a coronary artery is a common cause of sudden death. It often leads to acute myocardial infarction or exacerbation of chest pain.^34,35 Extensive studies in experimental animals and increasing clinical evidence indicate that autonomic nervous activity has a significant role in modifying the clinical outcome with coronary occlusion.^30,36,37 Susceptibility of the myocardium to acute ischemia was reviewed by Airaksinen,³⁸ who emphasized the key role of autonomic tone in the outcome after plaque rupture. Sympathetic hyperactivity favors the genesis of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias, whereas vagal activation exerts an antifibrillatory effect. Strong afferent stimuli from the ischemic myocardium may impair the arterial baroreflex and lead to hemodynamic instability.³⁹

There seems to be a wide interindividual variation in the type and severity of autonomic reactions during the early phase of abrupt coronary occlusion, a critical period for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The pre-existing severity of a coronary stenosis, adaptation or preconditioning to myocardial ischemia, habitual physical exercise, ß-blockade, and gender seem to affect autonomic reactions and the risk of fatal ventricular arrhythmias.^38,40,41 Recent studies have documented a hereditary component for autonomic function, and genetic factors may also modify the clinical presentation of acute coronary occlusion.^42,43 Table 3 depicts conditions and markers associated with myocardial vulnerability.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 3. Conditions and Markers Associated With Myocardial Vulnerability

Ischemic Vulnerable Myocardium With Prior Atherosclerosis-Derived Myocardial Damage (Chronic Myocardial Damage)
Any type of atherosclerosis-related myocardial injury, such as ischemia, an old or new myocardial infarction, inflammation, and/or fibrosis, potentially increases the patient’s vulnerability to arrhythmia and sudden death. In the past few decades, a number of diagnostic methods have been developed for imaging cardiac ischemia and for assessing the risk of developing a life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia. In patients with a history of ischemic heart disease, ischemic cardiomyopathy is the ultimate form of myocardial damage. With the advent of new, effective treatments for hypertension and more efficient management of acute myocardial infarction, deaths resulting from stroke and acute myocardial infarction have steadily decreased.⁴⁴ More patients are now surviving acute events, but some develop heart failure or ischemic cardiomyopathy later with the potential for fatal arrhythmias. It is also important to remember that in a significant number of patients, sudden cardiac death is the first manifestation of underlying heart disease, and it is still responsible for >450 000 deaths annually in the United States.

Nonischemic Vulnerable Myocardium
A smaller subset of patients experience fatal arrhythmia as a result of diseases other than coronary atherosclerosis. The various forms of cardiomyopathy (dilated, hypertrophic, restrictive, and right ventricular) account for most noncoronary cardiac deaths. Other underlying pathological processes include valvular heart disease, such as aortic stenosis and primary electrical disturbances (long-QT syndromes, Brugada syndrome, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, sinus and atrioventricular conduction disturbances, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, and congenital and drug-induced long QT syndromes with torsades de pointes), and, infrequently, commotio cordis from chest trauma. Less common pathological conditions include anomalous origin of a coronary artery, myocarditis, and myocardial bridging (Table 3). Circulating nonesterified fatty acids are another risk factor for sudden death in middle-aged men, as is elevated serum concentration of CRP; serum measurements may help screening for vulnerable myocardium.⁴⁵

Recently, the Task Force on Sudden Cardiac Death, organized by the European Society of Cardiology, issued a report that includes detailed diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations for a large number of cardiomyopathic conditions capable of causing sudden cardiac death.⁴⁶

Table 4 provides electrophysiological diagnostic criteria and techniques for detection of myocardial vulnerability.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 4. Available Techniques for Electrophysiological Risk Stratification of Vulnerable Myocardium

	Risk Assessment for Vulnerable Patients

Top Abstract Introduction Vulnerable (Thrombogenic) Blood Coagulation/Anticoagulation... Vulnerable Myocardium Risk Assessment for Vulnerable... New Risk Assessment Strategies References

 
Traditional Risk Assessment Strategies
Despite extensive studies and development of several risk prediction models, traditional CHD risk factors fail to predict development of CHD in a large group of cases (25%⁴⁷ to 50%^3,48,49). Risk prediction models developed on the basis of data from long-term population-based follow-up studies may not be able to predict short-term risks for individual persons. The recent report by Ridker et al,³ who noted a greater impact of an inflammatory marker such as serum CRP than LDL levels, is of interest. Several risk factor assessment models (eg, Framingham,⁵⁰ Sheffield,^51,52 New Zealand,^53,54 Canadian,⁵⁵ British,⁵⁶ European,⁵⁷ Dundee,⁵⁸ Munster [PROCAM],⁵⁹ and MONICA⁶⁰) have been developed. However, all of them are based on the traditional risk factors known to contribute to the chronic development of atherosclerosis. Addition of emerging risk factors, particularly those indicative of the activity of the disease (ie, plaque inflammation), may allow individualized risk assessments to be made.

The traditional risk assessment has been shown to predict long-term outcome in large populations. However, they fall short in predicting near-future events particularly in individual clinical practice. For example, a high Framingham Risk Score, although capable of forecasting an adverse cardiovascular event in 10 years, clearly falls short in accurately predicting events in individual patients and cannot provide a clear clinical route for cardiologists to identify and treat, to prevent near future victims of acute coronary syndromes and sudden death. The same is true for coronary evaluations using electrocardiography, myocardial perfusion tests, and coronary angiography. A positive test for coronary stenosis or reversible perfusion defect (ischemia), although considered as a major risk factor, must be coupled in the future with emerging methods of risk assessment for detection of vulnerable patients to predict more accurately the near-future outcome and prognosis. Those who have no indication of coronary stenosis or myocardial ischemia and who may even lack traditional risk factors may benefit from the techniques now under development that evaluate plaque biology and inflammation.

	New Risk Assessment Strategies

Top Abstract Introduction Vulnerable (Thrombogenic) Blood Coagulation/Anticoagulation... Vulnerable Myocardium Risk Assessment for Vulnerable... New Risk Assessment Strategies References

 
We propose a Cumulative Vulnerability Index based on the following:

• Vulnerable plaque/artery
  
• Vulnerable blood (prone to thrombosis)
  
• Vulnerable myocardium (prone to life-threatening arrhythmia)
  

This proposal is by no means intended to disregard the predictive value of traditional risk assessment strategies that have been proven in predicting long-term outcome but instead to strengthen their value in providing higher accuracy, especially for near-term outcomes.

Atherosclerosis is a diffuse and multisystem, chronic inflammatory disorder involving vascular, metabolic, and immune systems with various local and systemic manifestations. Therefore, it is essential to assess total vulnerability burden and not just search for a single, unstable coronary plaque. A composite risk score (eg, a vulnerability index), that comprises the total burden of atherosclerosis and vulnerable plaque in the coronaries (and aorta and carotid, femoral, etc, arteries), and that includes blood and myocardial vulnerability factors, should be a more accurate method of risk stratification. Such a vulnerability index would indicate the likelihood that a patient with certain factors would have a clinical event in the coming year. Use of the state-of-the-art bioinformatics tools such as neural networks may provide substantial improvement for risk calculations.⁶¹

The information used for developing such risk stratification in the future is likely to come from a combination of smaller prospective studies (eg, from new imaging techniques) and retrospective cohort studies (eg, for serum factors) in which the risks for near future cardiovascular events can be quantitatively calculated. A few such studies have been conducted or are underway.^2,62

In Search of the Vulnerable Patient
The ideal method for screening vulnerable patients should be (1) inexpensive, (2) relatively noninvasive, (3) widely reproducible, (4) readily applicable to an asymptomatic population, and (5) capable of adding predicted value to measurements of established risk factors. Such a method should provide a cost-effective, stepwise approach designed to further stratify risk and provide reliable diagnosis and pathways for monitoring therapy. Obviously, these goals are hard to achieve with today’s tools. However, it is well within our reach, if academia and industry in the field of cardiovascular medicine undertake a coordinated effort to embark on developing new screening and diagnostic techniques to identify vulnerable patients (Figure).

View larger version (27K): [in this window] [in a new window]   The "VP Pyramid." This pyramid illustrates a speculative roadmap in search of vulnerable patients (numbers represent population in the United States). The major need is to develop noninvasive, relatively inexpensive, readily available, and accurate screening/diagnostic tools allowing multistep screening of an apparently healthy population and those with known atherosclerosis but whose risks for acute events are uncertain. Modified with permission from the AEHA.

	Acknowledgments

 
We are indebted to Valentin Fuster, MD, and Salim Yusuf, MD, for their insightful reviews and thoughtful comments. We also greatly appreciate the administrative support provided by Jennifer Harris, Philip Ralston, and Madhir Kosa, PhD.

	Footnotes

 
Many of the authors of this work, in addition to their research activities, have served as consultants to and/or employees of pharmaceutical, medical equipment, and other related companies.

This article is Part II of a 2-part article. Part I appeared in the October 7, 2003 issue of Circulation (Circulation. 2003;108:1664–1672).

Guest editor for this article was Eugene Braunwald, MD, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Vulnerable (Thrombogenic) Blood Coagulation/Anticoagulation... Vulnerable Myocardium Risk Assessment for Vulnerable... New Risk Assessment Strategies References

 

1. Ridker PM, Cushman M, Stampfer MJ, et al. Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336: 973–979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
2. Ridker PM, Hennekens CH, Buring JE, et al. C-reactive protein and other markers of inflammation in the prediction of cardiovascular disease in women. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 836–843.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
3. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Rose L, et al. Comparison of C-reactive protein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in the prediction of first cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 1557–1565.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
4. Pasceri VWJ, Yeh ET. Direct proinflammatory effect of C-reactive protein on human endothelial cells. Circulation. 2000; 102: 2165–2168.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
5. Verma SLS, Badiwala MV, Weisel RD, et al. Endothelin antagonism and interleukin-6 inhibition attenuate the proatherogenic effects of C-reactive protein. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1890–1896.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
6. Koukkunen H, Penttila K, Kemppainen A, et al. C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, interleukin-6 and tumour necrosis factor- in the prognostic classification of unstable angina pectoris. Ann Med. 2001; 33: 37–47.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
   
7. Schonbeck U, Varo N, Libby P, et al. Soluble CD40L and cardiovascular risk in women. Circulation. 2001; 104: 2266–2268.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
8. Hwang SJ, Ballantyne CM, Sharrett AR, et al. Circulating adhesion molecules VCAM-1, ICAM-1, and E-selectin in carotid atherosclerosis and incident coronary heart disease cases: the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities (ARIC) study. Circulation. 1997; 96: 4219–4225.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
9. Kiechl S, Egger G, Mayr M, et al. Chronic infections and the risk of carotid atherosclerosis : prospective results from a large population study. Circulation. 2001; 103: 1064–1070.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
10. Bayes-Genis A, Conover CA, Overgaard MT, et al. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A as a marker of acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 1022–1029.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
11. Beaudeux JL, Burc L, Imbert-Bismut F, et al. Serum plasma pregnancy-associated protein A: a potential marker of echogenic carotid atherosclerotic plaques in asymptomatic hyperlipidemic subjects at high cardiovascular risk. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: e7–e10.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
12. Yamada Y, Izawa H, Ichihara S, et al. Prediction of the risk of myocardial infarction from polymorphisms in candidate genes. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 1916–1923.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
13. Lange LA, Lange EM, Bielak LF, et al. Autosomal genome-wide scan for coronary artery calcification loci in sibships at high risk for hypertension. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 22: 418–423.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
14. Ozaki K, Ohnishi Y, Iida A, et al. Functional SNPs in the lymphotoxin- gene that are associated with susceptibility to myocardial infarction. Nat Genet. 2002; 32: 650–654.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
15. Karnicki K, Owen WG, Miller RS, et al. Factors contributing to individual propensity for arterial thrombosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 22: 1495–1499.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
16. Libby P, Simon DI. Inflammation and thrombosis: the clot thickens. Circulation. 2001; 103: 1718–1720.[Free Full Text]
    
17. Barakat K, Kennon S, Hitman GA, et al. Interaction between smoking and the glycoprotein IIIa P1(A2) polymorphism in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38: 1639–1643.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
18. Douglas H, Michaelides K, Gorog DA, et al. Platelet membrane glycoprotein Ib gene -5T/C Kozak sequence polymorphism as an independent risk factor for the occurrence of coronary thrombosis. Heart. 2002; 87: 70–74.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
19. Redondo M, Watzke HH, Stucki B, et al. Coagulation factors II, V, VII, and X, prothrombin gene 20210GA transition, and factor V Leiden in coronary artery disease: high factor V clotting activity is an independent risk factor for myocardial infarction. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999; 19: 1020–1025.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
20. Reiner AP, Siscovick DS, Rosendaal FR. Hemostatic risk factors and arterial thrombotic disease. Thromb Haemost. 2001; 85: 584–595.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
21. Sambola A, Osende J, Hathcock J, et al. Role of risk factors in the modulation of tissue factor activity and blood thrombogenicity. Circulation. 2003; 107: 973–977.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
22. Passoni F, Morelli B, Seveso G, et al. Comparative short-term prognostic value of hemostatic and inflammatory markers in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes. Ital Heart J. 2002; 3: 28–33.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
23. Hoffmeister HM, Heller W, Seipel L. Activation markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis: alterations and predictive value in acute coronary syndromes. Thromb Haemost. 1999; 82: 76–79.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
24. Vaarala O, Puurunen M, Manttari M, et al. Antibodies to prothrombin imply a risk of myocardial infarction in middle-aged men. Thromb Haemost. 1996; 75: 456–459.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
25. Jouhikainen T, Pohjola-Sintonen S, Stephansson E. Lupus anticoagulant and cardiac manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 1994; 3: 167–172.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
26. Osula S, Bell GM, Hornung RS. Acute myocardial infarction in young adults: causes and management. Postgrad Med J. 2002; 78: 27–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
27. Burke AP, Kolodgie FD, Farb A, et al. Healed plaque ruptures and sudden coronary death: evidence that subclinical rupture has a role in plaque progression. Circulation. 2001; 103: 934–940.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
28. Mann J, Davies MJ. Mechanisms of progression in native coronary artery disease: role of healed plaque disruption. Heart. 1999; 82: 265–268.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
29. Servoss SJ, Januzzi JL, Muller JE. Triggers of acute coronary syndromes. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2002; 44: 369–380.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
30. Silveira A. Postprandial triglycerides and blood coagulation. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2001; 109: S527–S532.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
31. McNagny SE, Wenger NK. Postmenopausal hormone-replacement therapy. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 63–65.[Free Full Text]
    
32. Koenig W, Sund M, Filipiak B, et al. Plasma viscosity and the risk of coronary heart disease: results from the MONICA-Augsburg Cohort Study, 1984 to 1992. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998; 18: 768–772.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
33. Junker R, Heinrich J, Ulbrich H, et al. Relationship between plasma viscosity and the severity of coronary heart disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998; 18: 870–875.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
34. Myerburg RJ, Kessler KM, Castellanos A. Sudden cardiac death: structure, function, and time-dependence of risk. Circulation. 1992; 85 (suppl I): I-2–I-10.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
35. Kannel WB, Doyle JT, McNamara PM, et al. Precursors of sudden coronary death: factors related to the incidence of sudden death. Circulation. 1975; 51: 606–613.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
36. Schwartz PJ, Vanoli E, Zaza A, et al. The effect of antiarrhythmic drugs on life-threatening arrhythmias induced by the interaction between acute myocardial ischemia and sympathetic hyperactivity. Am Heart J. 1985; 109: 937–948.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
37. Vanoli E, De Ferrari GM, Stramba-Badiale M, et al. Vagal stimulation and prevention of sudden death in conscious dogs with a healed myocardial infarction. Circ Res. 1991; 68: 1471–1481.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
38. Airaksinen KE. Autonomic mechanisms and sudden death after abrupt coronary occlusion. Ann Med. 1999; 31: 240–245.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
39. Airaksinen KE, Tahvanainen KU, Eckberg DL, et al. Arterial baroreflex impairment in patients during acute coronary occlusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 32: 1641–1647.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
40. Billman GE, Schwartz PJ, Stone HL. The effects of daily exercise on susceptibility to sudden cardiac death. Circulation. 1984; 69: 1182–1189.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
41. Burke AP, Farb A, Malcom GT, et al. Plaque rupture and sudden death related to exertion in men with coronary artery disease. JAMA. 1999; 281: 921–926.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
42. Jouven X, Desnos M, Guerot C, et al. Predicting sudden death in the population: the Paris Prospective Study I. Circulation. 1999; 99: 1978–1983.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
43. Singh JP, Larson MG, O’Donnell CJ, et al. Heritability of heart rate variability: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1999; 99: 2251–2254.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
44. Claessens C, Claessens P, Claessens M, et al. Changes in mortality of acute myocardial infarction as a function of a changing treatment during the last two decades. Jpn Heart J. 2000; 41: 683–695.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
45. Jouven X, Charles MA, Desnos M, et al. Circulating nonesterified fatty acid level as a predictive risk factor for sudden death in the population. Circulation. 2001; 104: 756–761.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
46. Priori SG, Aliot E, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, et al. Task Force on Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2001; 22: 1374–1450.[Free Full Text]
    
47. Magnus P, Beaglehole R. The real contribution of the major risk factors to the coronary epidemics: time to end the "only-50%" myth. Arch Intern Med. 2001; 161: 2657–2660.[Free Full Text]
    
48. Lefkowitz RJ, Willerson JT. Prospects for cardiovascular research. JAMA. 2001; 285: 581–587.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
49. Nieto FJ. Cardiovascular disease and risk factor epidemiology: a look back at the epidemic of the 20th century. Am J Public Health. 1999; 89: 292–294.[Free Full Text]
    
50. Anderson KM, Odell PM, Wilson PW, et al. Cardiovascular disease risk profiles. Am Heart J. 1991; 121: 293–298.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
51. Ramsay LE, Haq IU, Jackson PR, et al. Targeting lipid-lowering drug therapy for primary prevention of coronary disease: an updated Sheffield table. Lancet. 1996; 348: 387–388.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
52. Wallis EJ, Ramsay LE, Ul Haq I, et al. Coronary and cardiovascular risk estimation for primary prevention: validation of a new Sheffield table in the 1995 Scottish health survey population. BMJ. 2000; 320: 671–676.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
53. 1996 National Heart Foundation clinical guidelines for the assessment and management of dyslipidaemia. Dyslipidaemia Advisory Group on behalf of the Scientific Committee of the National Heart Foundation of New Zealand. N Z Med J. 1996; 109: 224–231.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
54. Jackson R. Updated New Zealand cardiovascular disease risk-benefit prediction guide. BMJ. 2000; 320: 709–710.[Free Full Text]
    
55. McCormack JP, Levine M, Rangno RE. Primary prevention of heart disease and stroke: a simplified approach to estimating risk of events and making drug treatment decisions. CMAJ. 1997; 157: 422–428.[Abstract]
    
56. Joint British recommendations on prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice: summary. British Cardiac Society, British Hyperlipidaemia Association, British Hypertension Society, British Diabetic Association. BMJ. 2000; 320: 705–708.[Free Full Text]
    
57. Wood D, De Backer G, Faergeman O, et al. Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice: recommendations of the Second Joint Task Force of European and other Societies on Coronary Prevention. Atherosclerosis. 1998; 140: 199–270.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
58. Tunstall-Pedoe H. The Dundee coronary risk-disk for management of change in risk factors. BMJ. 1991; 303: 744–747.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
59. Assmann G, Cullen P, Schulte H. Simple scoring scheme for calculating the risk of acute coronary events based on the 10-year follow-up of the prospective cardiovascular Munster (PROCAM) study. Circulation. 2002; 105: 310–315.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
60. Manhem K, Dotevall A, Wilhelmsen L, et al. Social gradients in cardiovascular risk factors and symptoms of Swedish men and women: the Goteborg MONICA Study 1995. J Cardiovasc Risk. 2000; 7: 359–368.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    
61. Voss R, Cullen P, Schulte H, et al. Prediction of risk of coronary events in middle-aged men in the Prospective Cardiovascular Münster Study (PROCAM) using neural networks. Int J Epidemiol. 2002; 31: 1253–1264.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
62. Arad YSL, Goodman K, Newstein D, et al. Prediction of coronary events with electron beam computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 1253–1260.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. J. Goldberger, M. E. Cain, S. H. Hohnloser, A. H. Kadish, B. P. Knight, M. S. Lauer, B. J. Maron, R. L. Page, R. S. Passman, D. Siscovick, et al. American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation/Heart Rhythm Society Scientific Statement on Noninvasive Risk Stratification Techniques for Identifying Patients at Risk for Sudden Cardiac Death: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology Committee on Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Circulation, September 30, 2008; 118(14): 1497 - 1518. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. F. Langer, R. Haubner, B. J. Pichler, and M. Gawaz Radionuclide imaging a molecular key to the atherosclerotic plaque. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 2008; 52(1): 1 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Mega, D. A. Morrow, J. A. de Lemos, S. Mohanavelu, C. P. Cannon, and M. S. Sabatine Thrombus precursor protein and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 24, 2008; 51(25): 2422 - 2429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H.F. Rudd, K. S. Myers, S. Bansilal, J. Machac, C. A. Pinto, C. Tong, A. Rafique, R. Hargeaves, M. Farkouh, V. Fuster, et al. Atherosclerosis Inflammation Imaging with 18F-FDG PET: Carotid, Iliac, and Femoral Uptake Reproducibility, Quantification Methods, and Recommendations J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2008; 49(6): 871 - 878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. N. Redgrave, P. Gallagher, J. K. Lovett, and P. M. Rothwell Critical Cap Thickness and Rupture in Symptomatic Carotid Plaques: The Oxford Plaque Study Stroke, June 1, 2008; 39(6): 1722 - 1729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. O. Caymaz and G. Yuksel Fate of Incidental, Asymptomatic Lesions Discovered During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Angiology, May 1, 2008; 59(2): 193 - 197. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Nussberger, J.-F. Aubert, K. Bouzourene, M. Pellegrin, D. Hayoz, and L. Mazzolai Renin Inhibition by Aliskiren Prevents Atherosclerosis Progression: Comparison With Irbesartan, Atenolol, and Amlodipine Hypertension, May 1, 2008; 51(5): 1306 - 1311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D.C. Suh, J.K. Kim, J.W. Choi, B.S. Choi, H.W. Pyun, Y.J. Choi, M.-H. Kim, H.R. Yang, H.I. Ha, S.J. Kim, et al. Intracranial Stenting of Severe Symptomatic Intracranial Stenosis: Results of 100 Consecutive Patients AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2008; 29(4): 781 - 785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Rossi, A. Nuzzo, G. Origliani, and M. G. Modena Prognostic role of flow-mediated dilation and cardiac risk factors in post-menopausal women. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 11, 2008; 51(10): 997 - 1002. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Saam, H. R. Underhill, B. Chu, N. Takaya, J. Cai, N. L. Polissar, C. Yuan, and T. S. Hatsukami Prevalence of American Heart Association type VI carotid atherosclerotic lesions identified by magnetic resonance imaging for different levels of stenosis as measured by duplex ultrasound. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 11, 2008; 51(10): 1014 - 1021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Gottlieb and J. A.C. Lima Screening High-Risk Patients With Computed Tomography Angiography Circulation, March 11, 2008; 117(10): 1318 - 1332. [Full Text] [PDF]