Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2003;108:1760-1765
Published online before print September 22, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000091086.54107.49
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
108/14/1760    most recent
01.CIR.0000091086.54107.49v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, T.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Hamano, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, T.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Hamano, K.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Transplantation

(Circulation. 2003;108:1760.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Basic Science Reports

Long-Term Survival of Xenografted Neonatal Cardiomyocytes by Adenovirus-Mediated CTLA4-Ig Expression and CD40 Blockade

Tao-Sheng Li, MD, PhD; Hiroshi Ito, MD, PhD; Koji Kajiwara, MD, PhD; Kimikazu Hamano, MD, PhD

From the Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Medical Bioregulation (T.-S.L., H.I., K.H.), and the Department of Neurosurgery (K.K.), Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.

Correspondence to Kimikazu Hamano, MD, PhD, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Medical Bioregulation, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan 755-8505.

Received February 12, 2003; de novo received April 8, 2003; revision received June 4, 2003; accepted June 13, 2003.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Prolonged survival of xenografted neonatal cardiomyocytes was achieved by blocking the CD28/B7 costimulatory pathway via CTLA4-Ig gene transfer. We examined the long-term survival of xenografted neonatal cardiomyocytes by adenovirus-mediated CTLA4-Ig expression and transient CD40 blockade with anti-CD40L monoclonal antibody (MR1).

Methods and Results— Neonatal cardiomyocytes derived from Dark Agouti rats were infected with CTLA4-Ig-expressing adenovirus vectors and injected directly into the normal myocardium of C3H/He mice. Mice were also given an intraperitoneal injection of 500 µg MR1 (CTLA+MR group, n=30) or control immunoglobulin (CTLA group, n=30) 1 hour before and 1, 3, and 7 days after cardiomyocyte implantation. As a control, cells infected with ß-Gal-expressing adenovirus vector (RL group, n=15) and cells without infection (control group, n=15) were injected into additional mice. Mice from all groups were killed 2, 4, and 8 weeks after xenotransplantation, and mice from the CTLA+MR and CTLA groups were killed 4 and 6 months after xenotransplantation. Neonatal cardiomyocytes were successfully infected by adenovirus vectors. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that the xenografted cardiomyocytes survived and expressed CTLA4-Ig for 6 months in all mice from the CTLA+MR and CTLA groups. A gap junction between the xenografted and host cardiomyocytes was also confirmed. Conversely, neonatal cardiomyocytes did not survive for even 2 weeks after xenotransplantation in the mice from the RL and control groups.

Conclusions— Long-term survival of xenografted neonatal cardiomyocytes was achieved by adenovirus-mediated CTLA4-Ig expression and transient CD40 blockade.


Key Words: myocardium • transplantation • survival


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Although mature cardiomyocytes have a limited ability to proliferate after injury,1 the regeneration of lost cardiomyocytes is generally very poor. Cell transplantation is a potential method of repairing injured myocardium, for which several cell sources, including fetal cardiomyocytes, myoblasts, bone marrow cells, and others, have been used.2–10 Experimental studies have shown the effectiveness and feasibility of transplanting these cells into injured myocardium. On the basis of the electrophysiological characteristics of myocardium, fetal or neonatal cardiomyocytes are considered among the most ideal cell sources for repairing injured myocardium. To date, allografts of fetal or neonatal cardiomyocytes are the best-documented and most successful method of repairing injured myocardium. Allografted fetal or neonatal cardiomyocytes have shown long-term survival, differentiation and maturation, gap junction formation with host cardiomyocytes, and improved heart function.2,7,11–13

Despite their success, allografts of fetal cardiomyocytes may not be clinically feasible, first, because of their limited supply, and second, for ethical reasons. However, xenografts of fetal cardiomyocytes might be considered as an alternative if the problem of immunologic rejection could be overcome. A combined blockade of the CD40 and CD28 pathways has been shown to prolong the survival of xenografts,14–17 and we have observed prolonged survival of xenografted neonatal cardiomyocytes via adenovirus-mediated CTLA4-Ig expression for up to 8 weeks.18

In the present study, we transplanted rat neonatal cardiomyocytes into the myocardium of mice by combined blockade of the CD28 pathway via adenovirus-mediated CTLA4-Ig expression and of the CD40 pathway, with the transient administration of anti-CD40L monoclonal antibody (MR1). This report describes the long-term survival of xenografted neonatal cardiomyocytes for up to 6 months of follow-up.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Experimental Animals
We used neonatal Dark Agouti (DA) rats and 12-week-old C3/He mice (Japan SLC, Inc, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan) in this study, which was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Yamaguchi University School of Medicine. Animals were bred in clean laboratory conditions with free access to food and water in a temperature-controlled environment under a 12-hour light-dark cycle.

Isolation and Culture of Neonatal Cardiomyocytes
Cardiomyocytes were derived from newborn DA rats within 24 hours of birth. Cells were isolated by use of the neonatal cardiomyocyte isolation system (Worthington Biochemical Corp) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cardiomyocytes were then cultured in Leibovitz medium (L-15) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco), 100 mg/mL penicillin, and 250 ng/mL streptomycin (Gibco) in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37°C.

Adenoviral Infection of Neonatal Cardiomyocytes
Recombinant adenovirus vectors carrying CTLA4-Ig (AdCTLA) or ß-galactosidase (AdRL) were prepared as described previously.18 Viral titers of AdCTLA and AdRL were 2.8x109 and 2.5x109 pfu/mL, respectively. Fresh suspended rat cardiomyocytes (3x106 cells/mL) were seeded in a culture dish, and AdCTLA or AdRL vectors were then added at various concentrations according to the multiplicity of infection (MOI); namely, 1000, 500, 200, 100, 50, or 10. After 1 hour of incubation, nonadherent cells were collected and washed 3 times with L-15, then cultured as described above. To test the expression efficiency, cells were fixed in 0.5% glutaraldehyde for 10 minutes after 1, 2, and 3 days of culture, then X-gal-stained or immunohistochemically stained with FITC-labeled anti-CTLA4-Ig antibody (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Inc).

The cardiomyocytes used for xenografts were infected with AdCTLA or AdRL at MOI 50 as described. After 1 hour of infection, cells were collected and resuspended at a concentration of 5x107 cells/mL for immediate transplantation.

Cell Transplantation
The rat neonatal cardiomyocytes with AdCTLA infection were transplanted into the myocardium of normal left ventricular walls in C3/He mice as described previously.18 Briefly, mice were given general anesthesia, and tracheal intubation was performed with a 24F intravenous catheter. A mouse ventilator (model 687, Harvard Apparatus, Inc) was used to ventilate the animals with room air at a tidal volume of 10 mL/kg at 80 respirations/min. A left thoracotomy incision was made through the fourth intercostal space, and the thoracic cavity was opened. A 30-gauge needle attached to a 100-µL microsyringe was inserted into the left ventricle of the heart; 5x105 fetal cardiomyocytes in 10 µL of L-15 were injected directly, and the injection points were marked with fine stitches (7-0 polypropylene). After the lung was expanded, the chest and thoracotomy incisions were closed. Mice were also treated with 500 µg IP of MR1 (CTLA+MR group, n=30) or control immunoglobulin (CTLA group, n=30) 1 hour before, then 1, 3, and 7 days after cell transplantation. As a control, rat neonatal cardiomyocytes with AdRL infection (RL group, n=15) and those without infection (control group, n=15) were also xenografted into the left ventricle myocardium of mice as described.

Tissue Preparation
Five mice from all the groups were killed 2, 4, or 8 weeks after transplantation. After 30 minutes of recording of ECGs, the additional 7 or 8 mice in the CTLA+MR and CTLA groups were killed 4 or 6 months after cell transplantation. A sample of left ventricle wall centered from the marking suture of each mouse was immediately embedded in OCT compound and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. We prepared 5-µm-thick tissue slices for histological study.

Histological Study
To observe the local infiltration of lymphocytes 2, 4, and 8 weeks after cell transplantation, the tissue slices from each group were fixed and blocked, then incubated with FITC-labeled rat antibody against mouse CD45, CD8, and CD4 (Caltag Laboratories) for 1 hour at room temperature. The infiltrated CD45, CD8, and CD4 cells were counted by a single blinded observer under fluorescence microscopy with 400-fold magnification. At least 20 fields were selected randomly, and the mean numbers of positive cells per field was used for statistical analysis.

CTLA4-Ig expression in the xenografted rat neonatal cardiomyocytes from the CTLA and CTLA+MR groups was estimated by immunostaining with FITC-labeled anti-CTLA4-Ig antibody as described above. The change in CTLA4-Ig expression in the xenografted cells was estimated quantitatively by the density of CTLA4-Ig-positive cells, which were counted under fluorescence microscopy with 400-fold magnification, and the mean number of positive cells per field was used for statistical analysis. X-gal staining was also performed in the RL group.

Survival of xenografted rat neonatal cardiomyocytes was assessed by immunostaining with primary rabbit anti-rat atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) monoclonal antibody (Phoenix Pharmaceuticals, Inc). R-Phycoerythrin (R-PE)-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (Caltag Laboratories) was then used to detect expression of ANP. Because the expression of ANP was negative in rat neonatal cardiomyocytes 4 months after transplantation, the long-term survival of xenografted cardiomyocytes was assessed by the expression of troponin-I after immunostaining with the rabbit anti-rat troponin-I antibody, which specifically labeled the cardiomyocytes of rats but not mice. The survival of xenografted cardiomyocytes was also estimated quantitatively by counting the number of positive cells under fluorescence microscopy with 400-fold magnification. Thereafter, the slices were stained with hematoxylin and eosin.

To observe the formation of the cell junction between the xenografted and host cardiomyocytes 6 months after transplantation, the surviving cardiomyocytes were labeled by immunostaining with the rabbit anti-rat troponin-I antibody as described above, and the gap junction was then immunostained with R-PE-labeled rabbit anti-mouse connexin-43 antibody simultaneously. The formation of gap junction between xenografted and host cardiomyocytes was detected under fluorescence microscopy with 400-fold magnification.

Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as mean±SD. Statistical significance was evaluated by ANOVA followed by Scheffé’s procedure and by repeated ANOVA to test for interactions. A value of P<0.05 was considered significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
In Vivo Adenovirus-Mediated Gene Transfer of Neonatal Cardiomyocytes
The percentages of neonatal cardiomyocytes infected with adenoviral vectors are shown in Figure 1. X-gal staining and immunostaining showed an expression efficiency of {approx}60% at MOI 50 to 200 after infection with AdCTLA or AdRL. The cytotoxicity of the cardiomyocytes was not significant 3 days after the application of adenovirus at MOI<100; however, {approx}20%, 40%, and 50% of the cardiomyocytes died within 3 days of application at MOIs of 200, 500, and 1000, respectively, suggesting that MOI 50 is suitable for neonatal cardiomyocyte infection by the adenovirus vector. Therefore, we selected MOI 50 to infect the neonatal cardiomyocytes in our xenotransplantation study.



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Expression efficiency in rat neonatal cardiomyocytes 1, 2, and 3 days after infection with adenovirus vectors. A, Percentages of ß-gal expression cells detected by X-gal staining after infection with AdRL. B, Percentages of cells expressing CTLA4-Ig estimated by immunostaining after infection with AdCTLA.

Local Infiltration of Lymphocytes After the Xenotransplantation of Cardiomyocytes
The local infiltration of CD45, CD8, and CD4 in the myocardium of mice is shown in Figure 2. There was significantly less infiltration of CD45 cells in the CTLA and CTLA+MR groups than in the RL and control groups (Figure 2A). Quantitative analysis showed that the numbers of CD45, CD8, and CD4 cells were significantly lower in the CTLA and CTLA+MR groups than in the RL and control groups at 2 and 4 weeks (Figure 2B, P<0.05) but not 8 weeks after the xenotransplantation of cardiomyocytes. The numbers of CD45, CD8, and CD4 cells in the CTLA+MR group were also significantly lower than those in the CTLA group 2 weeks after the xenotransplantation of cardiomyocytes (Figure 2B, P<0.05).



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Lymphocyte infiltration in mouse myocardium 2, 4, and 8 weeks after neonatal cardiomyocyte xenotransplantation. A, Representative CD45 cell infiltration in mouse myocardium 2 weeks after xenotransplantation (top) indicated less CD45 cells in CTLA and CTLA+MR groups than in RL and control groups. B, Quantitative analysis (bottom) showed that density of CD45, CD8, and CD4 cells in mouse myocardium was significantly lower in CTLA and CTLA+MR groups than in RL and control groups 2 and 4 weeks after xenotransplantation, but there was no significant difference thereafter (n=5 in each group; *P<0.05 vs RL and control groups, {dagger}P<0.05 vs CTLA group).

CTLA4-Ig Expression in Neonatal Cardiomyocytes After Xenotransplantation
Immunostaining analysis showed that some cells in the normal myocardium expressed CTLA4-Ig positively for up to 6 months after the xenotransplantation of cardiomyocytes in both the CTLA and CTLA+MR groups (Figure 3). However, the number of CTLA4-Ig-positive cells decreased with time after the xenotransplantation, and the expression of CTLA-Ig was dimmer 4 and 6 months later than in the first 8 weeks. These findings indicated that CTLA4-Ig was produced by the xenografted cells for up to 6 months but tended to decrease with time after transplantation.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. CTLA4-Ig expression of xenografted neonatal cardiomyocytes. Quantitative analysis showed that density of CTLA4-Ig-positive cells was significantly higher in CTLA+MR group than in CTLA group and that CTLA4-Ig expression was also significantly lower 4 and 6 months (n=7 or 8 in each group) after xenotransplantation than within first 8 weeks (n=5 in each group) after xenotransplantation (*P<0.05 vs CTLA group, {dagger}P<0.05 vs 4 and 6 months after xenotransplantation in same group).

Survival and Maturation of Neonatal Cardiomyocytes After Xenotransplantation Into Mice
We found that some cells were stained positively by the anti-ANP antibody, which was expressed specifically in fetal and neonatal but not in adult cardiomyocytes, in all mice from the CTLA and CTLA+MR groups up to 8 weeks after the xenografting of rat neonatal cardiomyocytes. This demonstrates the survival of xenografted rat neonatal cardiomyocytes. The majority of these ANP-positive cells also expressed CTLA4-Ig simultaneously. However, no surviving rat neonatal cardiomyocytes were detected in the myocardium of mice from either the RL or control groups 2 weeks after the xenografting of rat neonatal cardiomyocytes.

We did not find any ANP-positive cells in mice from the CTLA and CTLA+MR groups 4 or 6 months after xenotransplantation, although some of the CTLA4-Ig-positive cells were still detectable. After we changed the antibody of troponin-I for labeling the survival of xenografted rat neonatal cardiomyocytes 4 and 6 months later, we found that some cells showed positivity to troponin-I and that the majority also expressed CTLA4-Ig. These cells showed morphological differentiation and maturation (Figure 4, B–D) similar to adult cardiomyocytes, and some joined to form cell islands (Figure 4A) within the mouse myocardium 6 months after transplantation. This finding suggested that these grafted rat neonatal cardiomyocytes were still surviving even 6 months later and matured with time after transplantation. Quantitative estimation showed that the survival of xenografted cardiomyocytes was significantly higher in the CTLA+MR group than in the CTLA group (Figure 4E, P<0.01).



View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Long-term survival of xenografted rat neonatal cardiomyocytes in normal myocardium of mice. A, Immunostaining with rat troponin-I monoclonal antibody showed survival of rat cardiomyocytes 6 months after xenotransplantation into normal myocardium of mice. B, Enlargement of inset in A. C, Hematoxylin-eosin stain of A. D, Enlargement of inset in C. These xenografted rat neonatal cardiomyocytes showed morphological differentiation and maturation similar to adult cardiomyocytes and formed a small cell island within normal myocardium of mice. Myofibril was also seen dimly in some of these cells. E, Survival of rat cardiomyocytes was estimated quantitatively by density of ANP positively stained cells within first 8 weeks (n=5 in each group) and density of troponin-I positively stained cells 4 and 6 months (n=7 or 8 in each group) after xenotransplantation. Statistical analysis showed significantly better survival of xenografted cardiomyocytes in CTLA+MR group than in CTLA group (*P<0.01 vs CTLA group, {dagger}P<0.05 vs 4 and 6 months after xenotransplantation in same group).

Cell Junction Between Xenografted and Host Cardiomyocytes
Immunostaining analysis showed that the gap junction was regular and distinct in the normal myocardium of mice but irregular within the xenografted cardiomyocytes (Figure 5B). However, the formation of a gap junction between xenografted and host cardiomyocytes was also found 6 months after cell transplantation (Figure 5C). No arrhythmia or other significant abnormal findings were recorded on ECGs in any of the mice 4 and 6 months after cardiomyocyte xenotransplantation (Figure 6), also suggesting the formation of cell junctions between xenografted and host cardiomyocytes.



View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Representative identification of cell junction between xenografted and host cardiomyocytes 6 months after xenotransplantation from mice in CTLA+MR group (n=8). A, Rat cardiomyocytes (green) survived in mouse myocardium. B, Immunostaining with connexin-43 showed a regular and distinct gap junction (red) in normal myocardium of mice, but gap junction was irregular within xenografted cardiomyocytes. C, Merged double fluorescence showed formation of a gap junction somewhere between xenografted and host cardiomyocytes (arrow).



View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. ECGs of mice in CTLA+MR group 6 months after cardiomyocyte xenotransplantation (A) and ECGs of normal mice (B). Compared with normal mice, no arrhythmias or other significant abnormal findings were recorded in any mice in CTLA and CTLA+MR groups 4 and 6 months after cardiomyocyte xenotransplantation.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Although cell transplantation is considered to be a feasible and effective method for repairing injured myocardium, the selection of cell sources for transplantation remains a subject of controversy. An ideal cell source for repairing injured myocardium would (1) provide sufficient cells that could collected easily; (2) have the same electrophysiological characteristics as cardiomyocytes; (3) have no immunologic or ethical problems for clinical application; and (4) survive efficiently for a long time, form a cell junction, and keep a synchronously beating network with host cardiomyocytes after transplantation.

To date, several cell sources have been assessed in experimental investigations2–10 or clinical trials,19,20 but one or more problems must still be overcome. Heterogenic neonatal cardiomyocytes should also be considered as a cell source for myocardium repair if the problem of immunologic rejection could be resolved after transplantation.

Combined blockade of the CD40 and CD28 pathways provided a possible means of resolving the problem of immunologic rejection of xenografts,14–17 and in our previous study, we observed the prolonged survival of xenografted neonatal cardiomyocytes via adenovirus-mediated CTLA4-Ig expression for 8 weeks.18 In this study, we blocked the CD28/B7 costimulatory pathway by adenovirus-mediated CTLA4-Ig expression and the CD154/CD40 costimulatory pathway by the transient administration of MR1 antibody. The CTLA4-Ig gene was transferred efficiently into the rat neonatal cardiomyocytes by use of the adenovirus vector without significant cytotoxicity. Although the expression of CTLA4-Ig seemed to decrease with time, expression of CTLA4-Ig was observed in these xenografted rat neonatal cardiomyocytes for up to 6 months. This finding suggests that adenovirus-mediated CTLA4-Ig expression is a feasible method for blocking the CD28/B7 costimulatory pathway for a prolonged period.

Previous studies have shown that adenovirus-mediated CTLA4-Ig expression does not cause a significant decrease in local leukocyte infiltration within the first few days after transplantation,21,22 but it does decrease thereafter.22 In the present study, we assessed the local infiltration of lymphocytes >=2 weeks after the xenotransplantation of cardiomyocytes. We found that the infiltration of CD45, CD8, and CD4-positive cells was significantly depressed by the blockade of the CD28 pathway via adenovirus-mediated CTLA4-Ig expression and further depressed by the simultaneous blockade of the CD40 pathway via the transient administration of MR1 at 2 and 4 weeks after xenotransplantation. This indicates that the combined blockade of the CD40 and CD28 pathways provided an effective method of inhibiting the immunologic rejection of the xenografts of cardiomyocytes. However, the lymphocyte infiltration decreased rapidly with time in the RL and control groups, with no significant difference found between these groups by 8 weeks after xenotransplantation. This could be explained by the fact that no xenografted cells survived for >2 weeks in the RL or control groups.

Although we witnessed prolonged survival of xenografted cardiomyocytes for 8 weeks in our previous study, longer-term survival of grafted cells is critically important for clinical application. In the present study, xenografted rat neonatal cardiomyocytes survived for up to 6 months of follow-up. These surviving rat neonatal cardiomyocytes had the shape of adult-like cardiomyocytes and lost the expression of ANP by 4 and 6 months after xenotransplantation. Our results indicate that the rat neonatal cardiomyocytes survived long term and differentiated into mature cardiomyocytes in the normal myocardium of mice after transplantation. Although long-term survival was also achieved by single CD28 pathway blockade via adenovirus-mediated CTLA4-Ig expression, cell survival was further improved by combination with the transient blockade of the CD40 pathway.

The formation of a gap junction between grafted and host cardiomyocytes means that the engrafted cells will integrate and form electromechanical coupling with the host myocardium, which is critically important for forming a synchronously beating network between the grafted and host cardiomyocytes. In this study, immunostaining with connexin-43 showed a distinct and well-organized gap junction in the host myocardium and a disorganized gap junction among the xenografted rat cardiomyocytes. However, the formation of a gap junction was also seen between the xenografted and host cardiomyocytes. Otherwise, we recorded no abnormal electrocardiography in any mice for up to 6 months after the xenotransplantation of rat neonatal cardiomyocytes. Although further investigation is required, these findings suggest the formation of synchronously beating networks between xenografted and host cardiomyocytes.

Despite these new and remarkable findings, the limitations of this study need to be addressed. First, we did not examine the improvement in cardiac function achieved by the xenotransplantation of neonatal cardiomyocytes. This study was also obviously limited by the fact that we xenografted neonatal cardiomyocytes into normal myocardium. Compared with the normal myocardium, the injured myocardium provided a more severe microenvironment for cell survival and growth, characterized by low tissue blood flow, hypoxia, and impaired nutrition. Cardiomyocytes have shown poor tolerance to ischemic conditions,23 and conflicting findings have been reported on the influence of survival of allografted cardiomyocytes in injured myocardium compared with normal myocardium.7,24 Therefore, it is still unknown whether xenografts of neonatal cardiomyocytes can survive well in injured myocardium with the same therapeutic strategy. We considered that the survival of xenografted neonatal cardiomyocytes in injured myocardium could not present difficulties because the majority of investigations have suggested the survival of allografted cardiomyocytes in injured myocardium.2,11–13,25 Furthermore, the severe microenvironment in the injured myocardium might be improved by combination therapy, such as inducing angiogenesis to improve blood flow of the injured myocardium.26,27

In conclusion, long-term survival of xenografts of neonatal cardiomyocytes was achieved by creating a blockade of the CD28 pathway via adenovirus-mediated CTLA4-Ig expression and the transient blockade of the CD40 pathway. We also found the maturation of xenografted neonatal cardiomyocytes and the formation of a gap junction between xenografted and host cardiomyocytes. Our findings suggest that the xenotransplantation of neonatal cardiomyocytes could be an alternative approach for repairing damaged myocardium.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by a grant-in-aid for scientific research (No. 11671326) from the Ministry of Education in Japan.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Beltrami AP, Urbanek K, Kajstura J, et al. Evidence that human cardiac myocytes divide after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 1750–1757.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Soonpaa MH, Koh GY, Klug MG, et al. Formation of nascent intercalated disks between grafted fetal cardiomyocytes and host myocardium. Science. 1994; 264: 98–101.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Klug MG, Soonpaa MH, Koh GY, et al. Genetically selected cardiomyocytes from differentiating embryonic stem cells form stable intracardiac grafts. J Clin Invest. 1996; 98: 216–224.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Taylor DA, Atkins BZ, Hungspreugs P, et al. Regenerating functional myocardium: improved performance after skeletal myoblast transplantation. Nat Med. 1998; 4: 929–933.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Ghostine S, Carrion C, Souza LC, et al. Long-term efficacy of myoblast transplantation on regional structure and function after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2002; 106 (suppl I): I-131–I-136.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Li RK, Jia ZQ, Weisel RD, et al. Smooth muscle cell transplantation into myocardial scar tissue improves heart function. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1999; 31: 513–522.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Scorsin M, Hagege A, Vilquin JT, et al. Comparison of the effects of fetal cardiomyocyte and skeletal myoblast transplantation on postinfarction left ventricular function. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000; 119: 1169–1175.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Tomita S, Li RK, Weisel RD, et al. Autologous transplantation of bone marrow cells improves damaged heart function. Circulation. 1999; 100 (suppl II): II-247–II-256.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Orlic D, Kajstura J, Chimenti S, et al. Bone marrow cells regenerate infarcted myocardium. Nature. 2001; 410: 701–705.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Etzion S, Barbash IM, Feinberg MS, et al. Cellular cardiomyoplasty of cardiac fibroblasts by adenoviral delivery of MyoD ex vivo: an unlimited source of cells for myocardial repair. Circulation. 2002; 106 (suppl I): I-125–I-130.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Reinecke H, Zhang M, Bartosek T, et al. Survival, integration, and differentiation of cardiomyocyte grafts: a study in normal and injured rat hearts. Circulation. 1999; 100: 193–202.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Matsushita T, Oyamada M, Kurata H, et al. Formation of cell junctions between grafted and host cardiomyocytes at the border zone of rat myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1999; 100 (suppl II): II-262–II-268.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Muller-Ehmsen J, Peterson KL, Kedes L, et al. Rebuilding a damaged heart: long-term survival of transplanted neonatal rat cardiomyocytes after myocardial infarction and effect on cardiac function. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1720–1726.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Lenschow DJ, Zeng Y, Thistlethwaite JR, et al. Long-term survival of xenogeneic pancreatic islet grafts induced by CTLA4lg. Science. 1992; 257: 789–792.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Lehnert AM, Yi S, Burgess JS, et al. Pancreatic islet xenograft tolerance after short-term costimulation blockade is associated with increased CD4+ T cell apoptosis but not immune deviation. Transplantation. 2000; 69: 1176–1185.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Elwood ET, Larsen CP, Cho HR, et al. Prolonged acceptance of concordant and discordant xenografts with combined CD40 and CD28 pathway blockade. Transplantation. 1998; 65: 1422–1428.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Feng S, Quickel RR, Hollister-Lock J, et al. Prolonged xenograft survival of islets infected with small doses of adenovirus expressing CTLA4Ig. Transplantation. 1999; 67: 1607–1613.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Li TS, Hamano K, Kajiwara K, et al. Prolonged survival of xenograft fetal cardiomyocytes by adenovirus-mediated CTLA4-Ig expression. Transplantation. 2001; 72: 1983–1985.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Menasche P, Hagege AA, Scorsin M, et al. Myoblast transplantation for heart failure. Lancet. 2001; 357: 279–280.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Strauer BE, Brehm M, Zeus T, et al. Repair of infarcted myocardium by autologous intracoronary mononuclear bone marrow cell transplantation in humans. Circulation. 2002; 106: 1913–1918.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Guillot C, Mathieu P, Coathalem H, et al. Tolerance to cardiac allografts via local and systemic mechanisms after adenovirus-mediated CTLA4Ig expression. J Immunol. 2000; 164: 5258–5268.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Ideguchi M, Kajiwara K, Yoshikawa K, et al. Local adenovirus-mediated CTLA4-immunoglobulin expression suppresses the immune responses to adenovirus vectors in the brain. Neuroscience. 2000; 95: 217–226.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Zhang M, Methot D, Poppa V, et al. Cardiomyocyte grafting for cardiac repair: graft cell death and anti-death strategies. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2001; 33: 907–921.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Scorsin M, Hagege AA, Dolizy I, et al. Can cellular transplantation improve function in doxorubicin-induced heart failure? Circulation. 1998; 98 (suppl II): II-151–II-155.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Koh GY, Soonpaa MH, Klug MG, et al. Stable fetal cardiomyocyte grafts in the hearts of dystrophic mice and dogs. J Clin Invest. 1995; 96: 2034–2042.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Yau TM, Fung K, Weisel RD, et al. Enhanced myocardial angiogenesis by gene transfer with transplanted cells. Circulation. 2001; 104 (suppl I): I-218–I-222.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Miyagawa S, Sawa Y, Taketani S, et al. Myocardial regeneration therapy for heart failure: hepatocyte growth factor enhances the effect of cellular cardiomyoplasty. Circulation. 2002; 105: 2556–2561.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
T.-S. Li, M. Hayashi, H. Ito, A. Furutani, T. Murata, M. Matsuzaki, and K. Hamano
Regeneration of Infarcted Myocardium by Intramyocardial Implantation of Ex Vivo Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}-Preprogrammed Bone Marrow Stem Cells
Circulation, May 17, 2005; 111(19): 2438 - 2445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
108/14/1760    most recent
01.CIR.0000091086.54107.49v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, T.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Hamano, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, T.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Hamano, K.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Transplantation