Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2003;108:1446-1450
Published online before print September 2, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000089092.61590.A8
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
108/12/1446    most recent
01.CIR.0000089092.61590.A8v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hirai, N.
Right arrow Articles by Ogawa, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hirai, N.
Right arrow Articles by Ogawa, H.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Angina
Hazardous Substances DB
*NITROGLYCERIN
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology

(Circulation. 2003;108:1446.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Attenuation of Nitrate Tolerance and Oxidative Stress by an Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker in Patients With Coronary Spastic Angina

Nobutaka Hirai, MD; Hiroaki Kawano, MD; Hirofumi Yasue, MD; Hideki Shimomura, MD; Shinzo Miyamoto, MD; Hirofumi Soejima, MD; Ichiro Kajiwara, MD; Tomohiro Sakamoto, MD; Michihiro Yoshimura, MD; Hajime Nakamura, MD; Junji Yodoi, MD; Hisao Ogawa, MD

From the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kumamoto University School of Medicine (N.H., H.K., K.T., H.S., S.M., H.S., T.S., K.K., H.O.) and Kumamoto Aging Research Institute (H.Y.), Kumamoto, and Department of Biological Responses (H.N., J.Y.), Institute for Virus Research, Kyoto University Graduate School, Kyoto, Japan.

Correspondence to Nobutaka Hirai, MD, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kumamoto University School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto City 860-8556, Japan. E-mail nobutaka{at}krmc.or.jp

Received October 17, 2001; de novo received May 22, 2003; revision received July 11, 2003; accepted July 14, 2003.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Nitrates are widely used to treat coronary artery disease, but their therapeutic value is compromised by the rapid development of tolerance. Recently, the renin-angiotensin system has been suggested to play an important role in the development of nitrate tolerance.

Methods and Results— Sixty-four patients with coronary spastic angina were investigated to clarify the effect of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) therapy on nitrate tolerance. Transdermal nitroglycerin (10 mg/d) and an ARB (candesartan, 8 mg/d) were administered to 21 patients (GTN+ARB group) for 3 days, whereas transdermal nitroglycerin and placebo were administered to 19 patients (GTN group). Another 18 patients were treated with placebo skin patches and placebo tablets for 3 days (control group). The brachial artery response to incremental doses of intravenous nitroglycerin (0.01, 0.1, and 1.0 µg/kg) was measured by ultrasound before and after transdermal nitroglycerin therapy. Before treatment, the arterial diameter was increased by nitroglycerin injection in each group. After treatment, the increase of arterial diameter was significantly suppressed in the GTN group but not in the control or GTN+ARB groups. The plasma level of thioredoxin (a marker of oxidative stress) was increased in the GTN group after treatment (P<0.01) but not in the control or GTN+ARB groups.

Conclusions— An ARB suppressed the development of nitrate tolerance during transdermal nitroglycerin therapy. These results suggest that increased oxidative stress induced by activation of angiotensin II may play an important role in the development of nitrate tolerance.


Key Words: angiotensin • nitroglycerin • ultrasonics • vasodilation


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Nitrates are widely used in the treatment of coronary artery disease and heart failure.1,2 Although these drugs are initially effective for such disorders, their therapeutic value is compromised by the rapid development of tolerance during sustained therapy.2,3 Nitrate tolerance has a multifactorial etiology that includes sulfhydryl depletion, activation of neurohormonal factors, expansion of plasma volume, and increased oxidative stress.2–4 Recently, Munzel and coworkers4,5 reported that the metabolism of nitroglycerin is associated with an increase of superoxide production during the development of nitrate tolerance. They postulated that activation of angiotensin II represents the first step toward nitrate tolerance and that increased superoxide flux is the final mediator, with the latter inactivating nitric oxide released either from the administered nitrate or from the vascular endothelium.5 However, there is still some controversy regarding the role of angiotensin II in the development of nitrate tolerance.

In the present study, we examined the effect of an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB), candesartan, on the development of nitrate tolerance and measured the plasma thioredoxin concentration as a marker of the cellular antioxidant status in patients with coronary spastic angina.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Subjects
Sixty-four patients with coronary spastic angina (mean age, 63.5±2.2 years) from our institution were enrolled in the study. They were all confirmed to have coronary vasospasm based on ST-segment changes after the intracoronary injection of acetylcholine,6 and none of them showed fixed coronary stenosis after administration of nitroglycerin during cardiac catheterization. None of the subjects had diabetes, a history of myocardial infarction, or evidence of impaired resting left ventricular function as assessed by echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects before the study was commenced, and the study procedures were in accordance with the guidelines approved by the ethics committee of our institution.

Study Design
We divided the 64 study subjects into 3 groups. Twenty-three patients were randomized to receive transdermal nitroglycerin (10 mg/d, Nippon-kayaku) plus an ARB (candesartan 8 mg/d, Takeda; GTN+ARB group) for 3 days, and another 23 patients were randomized to receive 3 days of transdermal nitroglycerin plus an ARB placebo (GTN group). In addition, 18 subjects were treated with an ARB placebo and a placebo skin patch for 3 days (control group). Two subjects withdrew from the GTN+ARB group and 4 subjects withdrew from the GTN group because of intolerable headache induced by nitrate therapy. No patient withdrew from the control group, so we studied a total of 58 subjects (control, 18; GTN, 19; GTN+ARB, 21). The clinical characteristics of these patients are shown in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Clinical Characteristics of the Subjects

On the first day (day 0, 6:30 AM), we measured the brachial artery diameter of each subject using the method described below. We simultaneously obtained a blood sample to evaluate the lipid profile and the plasma level of thioredoxin. After these measurements were completed (day 0, 7:00 AM), treatment was started with transdermal nitroglycerin (or placebo) and candesartan (or placebo). Transdermal nitroglycerin was applied twice a day (7:00 AM and 7:00 PM) on days 0, 1, and 2 and was finally removed at 5:30 AM on day 3. Candesartan was administered orally in the morning (7:00 AM) on days 0, 1, and 2. On day 3, we remeasured the brachial artery diameter and obtained another blood sample at 6:30 AM. Measurement was performed 1 hour after the cessation of transdermal nitroglycerin/placebo therapy to minimize the influence of residual circulating nitrate. A detailed outline of the study protocol is shown in Figure 1.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Outline of study protocol. Pp indicates placebo patch; Pt, placebo tablet.

Measurement of Brachial Artery Diameter
We measured the vasodilatory response of the brachial artery to incremental doses of intravenous nitroglycerin (0.01, 0.1, and 1.0 µg/kg) using ultrasound (SONOS 2500, Philips). We also measured the response of arterial diameter to sublingual nitroglycerin (0.3 mg) at 5 minutes after the end of intravenous infusion. Images were recorded using a super-VHS video recorder (BR-S601M, Victor). Vessel diameter was measured from the anterior to the posterior interface between the media and adventitia (the m line) at end diastole, coinciding with the R wave on a continuously recorded ECG7 at a fixed distance from an anatomical marker. The diameter was measured for 4 cardiac cycles, and the measurements were averaged. Both the measurements and offline videotape analyses were performed with blinding to treatment allocation. The time sequence of the brachial artery measurements is shown in Figure 2.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Outline of measurements of brachial artery diameter. After baseline measurement, brachial artery responses to incremental doses of intravenous nitroglycerin (0.01, 0.1, and 1.0 µg/kg) and 0.3 mg sublingual nitroglycerin were measured by ultrasound.

Blood Sampling and Assays
Blood samples were obtained before and after 3 days of treatment. The fasting serum total cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations were measured by enzymatic methods, and the serum HDL cholesterol concentration was measured by heparin-Ca2+/Ni2+ precipitation. We also measured the plasma thioredoxin concentration as a marker of cellular antioxidant activity using an ELISA kit (Redox Bioscience, Inc).8,9 The detection limit of the assay was 2.0 ng/mL, and the intraassay and interassay coefficients of variation were 0.81% to 3.74% and 4.87% to 6.97%, respectively.9

Statistical Analysis
Comparison of data among the 3 groups was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni multiple-comparison test. The {chi}2 test was used to compare the prevalence of smokers. Changes of variables were assessed by ANOVA with repeated measures followed by a post-hoc Scheffe test. In addition, differences between 2 means among the groups were assessed by the Student paired or unpaired t test, as appropriate. Statistical significance was defined as P<0.05.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
There were no differences in age, body mass index, lipid profile, or smoking status among the 3 groups (Table 1). Hemodynamic parameters did not change after transdermal nitroglycerin (placebo) treatment in any group (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Hemodynamic Parameters Measured During the Study

There were no differences of the baseline arterial diameter between the 3 groups on day 0 (control, 3.71±0.14; GTN, 3.66±0.15; GTN+ARB, 3.66±0.11 mm; P=NS by ANOVA). There were also no differences in the baseline arterial diameter between the 3 groups after transdermal nitroglycerin treatment (control, 3.70±0.18; GTN, 3.86±0.15; GTN+ARB, 3.78±0.08 mm; P=NS by ANOVA).

On day 0, the brachial artery response to incremental doses of intravenous nitroglycerin was comparable among the 3 groups (control, 0.9±0.6%, 9.3±1.2%, and 19.6±1.8%; GTN, 1.3±1.0%, 9.9±1.4%, and 18.6±1.6%; and GTN+ARB, 2.2±1.0%, 9.0±0.8%, and 17.5±2.0% at 0.01, 0.1, and 1.0 µg/kg; P=NS by ANOVA) (Figure 3A). On day 3 of transdermal nitroglycerin (placebo) treatment, however, the response of the GTN group was decreased compared with that of the other 2 groups (control, 2.4±0.7%, 11.1±1.3%, and 19.7±1.1%; GTN, 0.1±0.7%, 4.6±1.1%*{dagger}, and 11.9±1.5%*{dagger}; GTN+ARB, 1.9±0.8%, 10.0±1.4%, and 19.2±1.9% at 0.01, 0.1, and 1.0 µg/kg; *P<0.01 versus control, {dagger}P<0.01 versus GTN+ARB by ANOVA at the same dose of intravenous nitroglycerin) (Figure 3B).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Increase of brachial arterial diameter in response to incremental doses of intravenous nitroglycerin before (day 0; A) and after (day 3; B) treatment. {dagger}P<0.01 vs control group, {ddagger}P<0.01 vs GTN+ARB group, *P<0.01 by ANOVA.

After 3 days of transdermal nitroglycerin therapy, the response to sublingual nitroglycerin was also blunted in the GTN group compared with that in the control and GTN+ARB groups (control, 20.5±1.8% [before] versus 21.0±2.1% [after]; GTN, 22.0±2.0% versus 17.7±2.7%, P<0.05; GTN+ARB, 21.6±2.2% versus 22.6±2.4%) (Figure 4).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Increase of brachial arterial diameter in response to sublingual nitroglycerin (0.3 mg) before (day 0) and after (day 3) treatment.

The plasma thioredoxin level was increased after 3 days of nitroglycerin treatment in the GTN group, but it did not change in the control group or the GTN+ARB group (control, 32.2±5.4 versus 33.2±6.3; GTN, 36.9±7.8 versus 59.2±9.9*{dagger}; GTN+ARB, 30.9±3.9 versus 26.6±4.6 ng/mL, respectively; *P<0.01 versus control, {dagger}P<0.01 versus GTN+ARB by ANOVA) (Figure 5).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Changes in plasma thioredoxin level before (day 0) and after (day 3) treatment. {dagger}P<0.01 vs control group, {ddagger}P<0.01 vs GTN+ARB group, *P<0.05 by ANOVA.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The present study demonstrated that the response of brachial artery diameter to both intravenous and sublingual nitroglycerin was decreased in the GTN group by 3 days of transdermal nitroglycerin treatment, whereas the plasma concentration of thioredoxin was increased in this group. There were no such changes in the control and GTN+ARB groups. These findings suggest that concomitant administration of candesartan could suppress the development of nitrate tolerance during continuous nitroglycerin treatment in patients with coronary spastic angina. The present study is the first to show that an ARB suppressed both the development of nitrate tolerance and oxidative stress in humans.

The phenomenon of nitrate tolerance was first described in the early 20th century and was thought to be attributable to the inability of vascular tissues to respond to nitroglycerin.10 The clinical importance of this phenomenon is that it limits the efficacy of nitroglycerin when treating patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure.2–4 Although the mechanism of nitrate tolerance remains poorly understood, a beneficial effect of ACE inhibitors has already been reported by other investigators4,5,11,12 as well as by us.13 However, some studies did not reveal a beneficial effect of ACE inhibitors.14–16 Also, Parker and coworkers17 concluded that losartan had no impact on nitrate tolerance in healthy volunteers. The present findings are not supported by these negative studies, which investigated nitrate tolerance in patients with congestive heart failure,14,15 patients with coronary artery disease,15 and healthy volunteers.16 Although they investigated the effects of nitrate on hemodynamics14–17 or on the resistance vessels using plethysmography,17 we assessed the effect of an ARB on nitrate tolerance by measuring the diameter of a conduit artery in patients with coronary spastic angina. Jeserich et al18 reported that after 24 and 48 hours of intravenous infusion of nitroglycerin, additional nitroglycerin infusion did not change the radial artery diameter, and they concluded that there was no nitrate tolerance of the conductance vessels after 48 hours of continuous intravenous nitroglycerin. The difference between our findings and the results of Jeserich et al may caused by 2 factors. First, the duration of nitroglycerin administration was longer in our protocol. Second, they infused additional doses of nitroglycerin during continuous intravenous administration of the drug, whereas we observed the effect of nitroglycerin on brachial artery diameter after the cessation of continuous nitrate therapy. Therefore, the method of inducing nitrate tolerance was not the same. Jeserich et al also reported that the arterial diameter returned to baseline within 35 minutes after the withdrawal of continuous nitrate therapy,18 a finding that may support the timing of our measurement of arterial diameter.

Coronary vasospasm plays an important role in the pathogenesis of not only variant angina but also ischemic heart disease, including acute myocardial infarction and sudden death.19 Coronary spastic angina is evoked by spasm of large epicardial coronary arteries,19 and we previously showed that the coronary arteries of patients with coronary spastic angina have a supersensitive dilatory response to nitroglycerin.20 The present method can directly measure the effects on conduit arteries and is suitable for patients with coronary vasospasm.

Recently, it was revealed that activation of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor stimulates NADH/NADPH oxidase in the vascular endothelium and leads to production of reactive oxygen species.21 Munzel and coworkers4,5 reported that enhanced activation of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor by continuous nitrate therapy led to increased production of oxygen radicals by both endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells. These radicals can inactivate nitric oxide, leading to decreased cyclic GMP production, and thus cause nitrate tolerance. In fact, antioxidants like vitamin C and vitamin E have been reported to prevent the development of nitrate tolerance during continuous nitroglycerin treatment.22,23 An antioxidant effect of ARBs has also been recognized in recent years.24–27 ARBs decrease a marker of oxidative stress, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, in an animal model26 and reduced the 8-isoprostane level in patients with hypercholesterolemia.27 Our results are supported by these observations.

In the present study, we measured plasma thioredoxin as a marker of oxidative stress. Thioredoxins is a small protein with a redox-active dithiol/disulfide at its active site, and it is critical for the redox regulation of protein function and for signaling via modulation of the thiol redox status.28 Cytosolic thioredoxin has numerous functions, including protection against oxidative stress, control of cell growth, and modulation of apoptosis.28–30 Thioredoxin is induced by oxidative stress and is secreted by cells. Previous studies have shown that the plasma/serum level of thioredoxin is elevated in oxidative stress–associated disorders, such as ischemia-reperfusion injury8 and viral infection.31 Thus, the plasma/serum level of thioredoxin is a good marker of the host response to oxidative stress.

Study Limitations
We measured the increase of brachial artery diameter in response to exogenous nitroglycerin, so the baseline diameter may influence the vasodilation rate. To minimize the effects of nitroglycerin patches on the baseline diameter, we removed the patch 1 hour before measurement. Nitroglycerin has a plasma half-life of approximately 1 to 4 minutes,4 but its biologically active dinitrate metabolites have a half-life of approximately 40 minutes,4 so we could not exclude an effect of dinitrate on vessel diameter.

Candesartan cilexetil is rapidly and completely hydrolyzed to the active compound candesartan during its absorption from the gastrointestinal tract.32 A single dose of candesartan cilexetil is known to reduce the arterial pressure at 4 hours after administration in patients with hypertension.33 The time until the maximum plasma concentration (tmax), plasma half-life (t1/2ß), and mean residence time after candesartan cilexetil (8 mg) was administered to human volunteers were 4.3 to 4.4 hours, 9.05 to 9.4 hours, and 11.6 hours, respectively.34 The lack of hemodynamic changes in our subjects might have arisen because candesartan was administered for a short time (3 days) and because trough blood pressure was measured rather than the peak level (Figure 1).

The time required to induce tolerance was relatively short, but it may be that the short- and long-term mechanisms of nitrate tolerance are different. Munzel and coworkers5 mentioned the time course for the development of tolerance and pseudotolerance. They stated that pseudotolerance begins immediately after the initiation of nitrate treatment, whereas true tolerance requires at least 3 days of treatment. Additional investigation will be necessary to assess the long-term changes of brachial artery diameter and thioredoxin levels during nitrate therapy.

Also, the effects of ARB therapy on nitrate tolerance in patients with coronary spasm may not be the same as in patients with other types of coronary artery disease, so additional investigations are needed to determine the mechanisms of nitrate tolerance in patients with atherosclerotic disease.

In conclusion, ARB administration suppressed the development of nitrate tolerance during transdermal nitroglycerin therapy. This finding suggests that an increase of oxidative stress induced by angiotensin II activation may play an important role in the development of nitrate tolerance.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (14770318) from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, a Research Grant for Cardiovascular Diseases (14C-4) from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, and by a Grant-in-Aid from the Smoking Research Foundation (Tokyo, Japan).


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Parker JD, Parker JO. Nitrate therapy for stable angina pectoris. N Engl J Med. 1998; 338: 520–531.[Free Full Text]

2. Elkayam U. Nitrates in the treatment of congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 1996; 77: 41C–51C.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Glasser SP. Prospects for therapy of nitrate tolerance. Lancet. 1999; 353: 1545–1546.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Munzel T, Kurz S, Heitzer T, et al. New insights into mechanisms underlying nitrate tolerance. Am J Cardiol. 1996; 77: 24C–30C.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Kurz S, Hink U, Nickenig G, et al. Evidence for a causal role of the rennin-angiotensin system in nitrate tolerance. Circulation. 1999; 99: 3181–3187.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Okumura K, Yasue H, Horio Y, et al. Multivessel coronary spasm in patients with variant angina: a study with intracoronay injection of acetylcholine. Circulation. 1988; 77: 535–542.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Pignoli P, Tremoli E, Poli A, et al. Intimal plus medial thickness of the arterial wall: a direct measurement with ultrasound imaging. Circulation. 1986; 74: 1399–1406.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Nakamura H, Vaage J, Valen G, et al. Measurements of plasma glutaredoxin and thioredoxin in healthy volunteers and during open-heart surgery. Free Radic Biol Med. 1998; 24: 1176–1186.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Kogaki H, Fujiwara Y, Yoshiki A, et al. Sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for adult T-cell leukemia-derived factor and normal value measurement. J Clin Lab Anal. 1996; 10: 257–261.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Crandall LA, Leake CD, Loevenhart AS, et al. Acquired tolerance to and cross-tolerance between the nitrous and nitric acid esters and sodium nitrite in man. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1931; 41: 103–119.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Watanabe H, Kakihana M, Ohtsuka S, et al. Preventive effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on nitrate tolerance during continuous transdermal application of nitroglycerin in patients with chronic heart failure. Jpn Circ J. 1998; 62: 353–358.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Elkayam U, Johnson JV, Shotan A, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effect of organic nitrates in patients with chronic heart failure treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition. Circulation. 1999; 99: 2652–2657.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Murohara T, Tayama S, Tabuchi T, et al. Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor alacepril in patients with stable effort angina during chronic isosorbide dinitrate treatment. Am J Cardiol. 1996; 63: 1159–1163.

14. Dupuis J, Lalonde G, Bichet D, et al. Captopril does not prevent nitroglycerin tolerance in heart failure. Can J Cardiol. 1990; 6: 281–286.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Dakak N, Makhoul N, Flugelman MY, et al. Failure of captopril to prevent nitrate tolerance in congestive heart failure secondary to coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1990; 66: 608–613.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Parker JD, Parker JO. Effect of therapy with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor on hemodynamic and counterregulatory responses during continuous therapy with nitroglycerin. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 21: 1445–1453.[Abstract]

17. Milone SD, Azevedo ER, Forster C, et al. The angiotensin II-receptor antagonist losartan does not prevent hemodynamic or vascular tolerance to nitroglycerin. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1999; 34: 645–650.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Jeserich M, Munzel T, Pape L, et al. Absence of vascular tolerance in conductance vessels after 48 hours of intravenous nitroglycerin in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 26: 50–56.[Abstract]

19. Yasue H, Kugiyama K. Coronary spasm: clinical features and pathogenesis. Intern Med. 1997; 36: 760–765.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Kugiyama K, Ohgushi M, Sugiyama S, et al. Supersensitive dilator response to nitroglycerin but not to atrial natriuretic peptide in spastic coronary arteries in coronary spastic angina. Am J Cardiol. 1997; 79: 606–610.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Griendling KK, Minieri CA, Ollerenshaw JD, et al. Angiotensin II stimulates NADH and NADPH oxidase activity in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 1994; 74: 1141–1148.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Bassenge E, Fink N, Skatchkov M, et al. Dietary supplement with vitamin C prevents nitrate tolerance. J Clin Invest. 1998; 102: 67–71.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Watanabe H, Kakihana M, Ohtsuka S, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of vitamin E supplementation on attenuation of development of nitrate tolerance. Circulation. 1997; 96: 2545–2550.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Rajagopalan S, Kurz S, Munzel T, et al. Angiotensin II-mediated hypertension in the rat increases vascular superoxide production via membrane NADH/NADPH oxidase activation: contribution to alterations of vasomotor tone. J Clin Invest. 1996; 97: 1916–1923.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Khaper N, Singal PK. Modulation of oxidative stress by a selective inhibition of angiotensin II type 1 receptors in MI rats. Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 1461–1466.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Padi SS, Chopra K. Selective angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade ameliorates cyclosporine nephrotoxicity. Pharmacol Res. 2002; 45: 413–420.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Wassmann S, Hilgers S, Laufs U, et al. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonism improves hypercholesterolemia-associated endothelial dysfunction. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 22: 1208–1212.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Arner ESJ, Holmgren A. Physiological functions of thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase. Eur J Biochem. 2000; 267: 6102–6109.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Nakamura H, Nakamura K, Yodoi J. Redox regulation of cellular activation. Ann Rev Immunol. 1997; 15: 351–369.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Shioji K, Kishimoto C, Nakamura H, et al. Overexpression of thioredoxin-1 in transgenic mice attenuates adriamycin-induced cardiotoxicity. Circulation. 2002; 106: 1403–1409.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Nakamura H, De Rosa S, Roederer M, et al. Elevation of plasma thioredoxin levels in HIV-infected individuals. Int Immunol. 1996; 8: 603–611.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Hubner R, Hogemann AM, Sunzel M, et al. Pharmacokinetics of candesartan after single and repeated doses of candesartan cilexetil in young and elderly healthy volunteers. J Hum Hypertens. 1997; 11: S19–S25.

33. Fridman K, Andersson OK, Wysocki M, et al. Acute effects of candesartan cilexetil (the new angiotensin II antagonist) on systemic and renal haemodynamics in hypertensive patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1998; 54: 497–501.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. McClellan KJ, Goa KL. Candesartan cilexetil: a review of its use in essential hypertension. Drugs. 1998; 56: 847–869.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
D. Rhoney and W. F. Peacock
Intravenous therapy for hypertensive emergencies, part 1
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., August 1, 2009; 66(15): 1343 - 1352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
M. White, H. Ross, S. Levesque, L. Whittom, G. B Pelletier, N. Racine, S. Meloche, and L. Voisin
Effects of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Versus Valsartan on Cellular Signaling Events in Heart Transplant
Ann. Pharmacother., May 1, 2009; 43(5): 831 - 839.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
T. Thum, D. Fraccarollo, S. Thum, M. Schultheiss, A. Daiber, P. Wenzel, T. Munzel, G. Ertl, and J. Bauersachs
Differential Effects of Organic Nitrates on Endothelial Progenitor Cells Are Determined by Oxidative Stress
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, April 1, 2007; 27(4): 748 - 754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
A. Shamaei-Tousi, J. P. Halcox, and B. Henderson
Stressing the obvious? Cell stress and cell stress proteins in cardiovascular disease
Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2007; 74(1): 19 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. Yamauchi, H. Nakano, J. Maekawa, Y. Okamoto, Y. Ohnishi, T. Suzuki, and H. Kimura
Oxidative Stress in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Chest, May 1, 2005; 127(5): 1674 - 1679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
108/12/1446    most recent
01.CIR.0000089092.61590.A8v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hirai, N.
Right arrow Articles by Ogawa, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hirai, N.
Right arrow Articles by Ogawa, H.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Angina
Hazardous Substances DB
*NITROGLYCERIN
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology