| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2003;108:1422.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinician Update |
From the Framingham Heart Study of the National Heart, Blood, and Lung Institute, Boston, Mass.
Correspondence to Boston University School of Medicine, 715 Albany St, Evans 204, Boston, MA 02118. E-mail pwilson{at}bu.edu
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The major adverse consequence of the MetS is cardiovascular disease (CVD). Several of the metabolic abnormalities associated with the syndrome, in fact, are CVD risk factors. One of these abnormalities, insulin resistance, also predisposes to the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
In age-adjusted estimates from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III in 1998 to 1994, approximately 24% of adult Americans had
3 of the 5 MetS criteria. Key determinants of greater prevalence were age and ethnicity. Prevalence rates were highest in Mexican Americans and were successively lower in white, African American and other racial groups.2 These published estimates included persons with diabetes mellitus who had met the 1998 fasting glucose criteria (
126 mg/dL [8.0 mmol/L]) of the American Diabetes Association.3 This article will focus on the features of the MetS in persons without diabetes mellitus, although most persons with T2DM also have the MetS. Moreover, the therapeutic approaches to metabolic risk factors described here also can be applied to most patients with T2DM.
| Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Patients With MetS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Some of the risk factors listed for the MetS are not included in Framingham risk scoring. These include abdominal obesity, a proinflammatory state (high levels of C-reactive protein), impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance, and a prothrombotic state (high levels of fibrinogen). ATP III guidelines do not recommend routine measurement of these emerging risk factors, but they are listed as optional measures. If they are found to be abnormal in patients with characteristics of the MetS, the physician has the option to adjust risk higher than estimated from Framingham risk scoring. This approach, however, is somewhat problematic because reliable, quantitative adjustments to risk have not been developed.
| Abdominal Adiposity |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Traditional measures of determining adiposity, such as relative weight tables circulated by insurance providers, are important determinants of a variety of cardiovascular risk factors, especially hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia.79 Body mass index (BMI), the weight in kilograms divided by the height in meters squared, has become the measure commonly used to assess total adiposity and is thought to play a secondary role behind abdominal adiposity in the development of several metabolic risk processes. Investigators who have studied the effects of total obesity (BMI) and abdominal obesity (waist or waist/hip measurements) on outcomes, have typically found that both measures of obesity increase risk of heart disease and diabetes mellitus.6,7,10
How Do You Make the Diagnosis?
Three simple measurements should be made on all patients, as follows: height, weight, and maximal abdominal girth using a tape measure. The body mass should be calculated or read off a chart, and the physician should inform the patient of his or her category: normal (BMI 18.5 to 25 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25 to 30 kg/m2), or obese (BMI >30 kg/m2). An increased waist girth (
35 in [88 cm] for women,
40 in [103 cm] for men) defines excess abdominal adiposity according to the ATP III criteria. Slightly different criteria are being considered in other populations, especially among Asians. The appropriate time to do this is at the time of an initial visit.
What Are the Treatment Options for Excess Adiposity in the MetS?
A weight-reduction diet should be prescribed for obese patients. Various strategies are available, but the most common approach for overweight persons who may have the MetS is a balanced-calorie diet. If this diet prescription is followed, the patient would be expected to gradually approach a normal weight category. A typical prescription would be to estimate the patients current needs with a dietary and physical activity history. A reduction in calories by approximately 500 cal/d is often an acceptable strategy to achieve the goal of an ideal weight. Take the example of a sedentary woman, 50 years of age, height 66 inches, weight 190 pounds, BMI 29 kg/m2, and no reported exercise. By the Harris-Benedict equation, the usual caloric intake would be estimated at 1556 cal/d.11 Dietary consumption of 1050 cal/d, a 500 cal/d lower intake, with no change in exercise would be expected to lead to a weight loss of approximately one pound a week. The ideal weight target for this woman would be 129 pounds. A panel of obesity experts has recommended an initial goal of weight loss as approximately 10% of baseline and a reasonable time to achieve this goal as 6 months.12 As discussed in more detail below, this diet should also follow guidelines for cholesterol (<300 g/d) and fat intake (25% to 35% calories as fat) as set forward in the NCEP ATP III guidelines.
More aggressive approaches are possible for obese individuals and in special situations. Such care is typically provided in a weight loss clinic. Very restrictive diets for weight management include other treatment options, usually overseen by an obesity specialist. One of the options is a very low-calorie liquid diet of 500 to 1200 calories/d and requiring intensive outpatient medical supervision and laboratory monitoring of electrolyte levels and liver function. Unfortunately, long-term maintenance of lost weight has been problematic. Weight is usually regained, and behavioral modification and physical activity components are underprescribed by healthcare providers.13
Pharmacological agents are available to treat persons with excess adiposity. The 2 main classes of agents are appetite suppressants and inhibitors of nutrient absorption.14 In the appetite suppressant group, common choices include phentermine derivatives (noradrenergic) and sibutramine (inhibitor of serotonin reuptake and norepinephrine). These agents are usually taken in the late morning, lead to decreased appetite in the late afternoon and evening, and may have side effects related to noradrenergic excess. In the nutrient inhibitor class, orlistat (an inhibitor of gastrointestinal lipase) is the only medication currently available. It prevents the absorption of approximately 30% of the fat that is consumed and must be taken at the time of the fat consumption. Undesirable side effects such as flatulence and oil leakage in the stool often occur early in the course of treatment with this medication. Each of these weight loss medications is typically used as a single agent. The expected weight loss varies greatly but is typically 5% to 10% of initial weight. In randomized clinical trials, orlistat in obese persons with T2DM at baseline led to improved glycemic control15,16 and a weight reduction of 6% over 1 year versus 4% weight loss with placebo.15 A recently published meta-analysis concerning the efficacy of pharmacological agents for obesity reported that average weight loss was approximately 4 kilograms more than for placebo users and that no drug or class of drugs was clearly superior.17 Many persons who do not respond to weight loss diet or medications are candidates for weight loss surgery if they are extremely obese (BMI >40 kg/m2) or if they have a BMI >35 to 40 kg/m2 and one or more comorbid conditions, items that are typical elements of the MetS.
A successful surgical program to treat obesity includes psychological profiling and extensive preoperative screening for conditions such as prior coronary artery disease. One of the most popular and effective procedures is a vertically banded gastric bypass surgery, and weight typically declines 40% at 1 year and 62% at 5 years.18 Several components of the MetS usually improve in concert with weight loss after surgery, including lipids and glucose levels, but assiduous follow-up is needed. Monitoring of vitamin and hematologic status, adherence to specific postoperative dietary instructions, and psychological issues are important for long-term success after weight loss surgery. Laparoscopic techniques that include putting a collar around the proximal end of the stomach are now available. The noninvasive methods have been associated with less weight loss, and their long-term utility has still not been fully evaluated.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Yanagiya, A. Tanabe, A. Iida, S. Saito, A. Sekine, A. Takahashi, T. Tsunoda, S. Kamohara, Y. Nakata, K. Kotani, et al. Association of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in MTMR9 gene with obesity Hum. Mol. Genet., December 15, 2007; 16(24): 3017 - 3026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C A Daly, P Hildebrandt, M Bertrand, R Ferrari, W Remme, M Simoons, K M Fox, and on behalf of the EUROPA investigators Adverse prognosis associated with the metabolic syndrome in established coronary artery disease: data from the EUROPA trial Heart, November 1, 2007; 93(11): 1406 - 1411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Schindler Review: The metabolic syndrome as an endocrine disease: is there an effective pharmacotherapeutic strategy optimally targeting the pathogenesis? Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, October 1, 2007; 1(1): 7 - 26. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou, G. S Metsios, Y. Koutedakis, A. M Nevill, K. M Douglas, A. Jamurtas, J. J C S V. van Zanten, M. Labib, and G. D Kitas Redefining overweight and obesity in rheumatoid arthritis patients Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2007; 66(10): 1316 - 1321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Mukuddem-Petersen, M. B Snijder, R. M van Dam, J. M Dekker, L. M Bouter, C. D. Stehouwer, R. J Heine, G. Nijpels, and J. C Seidell Sagittal abdominal diameter: no advantage compared with other anthropometric measures as a correlate of components of the metabolic syndrome in elderly from the Hoorn Study. Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2006; 84(5): 995 - 1002. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Yancura, C. M. Aldwin, M. R. Levenson, and A. Spiro III Coping, affect, and the metabolic syndrome in older men: how does coping get under the skin? J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., September 1, 2006; 61(5): P295 - P303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kahn, J. Buse, E. Ferrannini, and M. Stern The Metabolic Syndrome: Time for a Critical Appraisal: Joint statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes Diabetes Care, September 1, 2005; 28(9): 2289 - 2304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Hegele and R. L. Pollex Genetic and physiological insights into the metabolic syndrome Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2005; 289(3): R663 - R669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Song, P. M. Ridker, J. E. Manson, N. R. Cook, J. E. Buring, and S. Liu Magnesium Intake, C-Reactive Protein, and the Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Middle-Aged and Older U.S. Women Diabetes Care, June 1, 2005; 28(6): 1438 - 1444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G D Kolovou, K K Anagnostopoulou, and D V Cokkinos Pathophysiology of dyslipidaemia in the metabolic syndrome Postgrad. Med. J., June 1, 2005; 81(956): 358 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Irace, C. Cortese, E. Fiaschi, C. Carallo, G. Sesti, E. Farinaro, and A. Gnasso Components of the Metabolic Syndrome and Carotid Atherosclerosis: Role of Elevated Blood Pressure Hypertension, April 1, 2005; 45(4): 597 - 601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Angelico, M. Del Ben, R. Conti, S. Francioso, K. Feole, S. Fiorello, M. G. Cavallo, B. Zalunardo, F. Lirussi, C. Alessandri, et al. Insulin Resistance, the Metabolic Syndrome, and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2005; 90(3): 1578 - 1582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A Armitage, I. Y Khan, P. D Taylor, P. W Nathanielsz, and L. Poston Developmental programming of the metabolic syndrome by maternal nutritional imbalance: how strong is the evidence from experimental models in mammals? J. Physiol., December 1, 2004; 561(2): 355 - 377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sinha, G. Perdomo, N. F. Brown, and R. M. O'Doherty Fatty Acid-induced Insulin Resistance in L6 Myotubes Is Prevented by Inhibition of Activation and Nuclear Localization of Nuclear Factor {kappa}B J. Biol. Chem., October 1, 2004; 279(40): 41294 - 41301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. C. Marroquin, K. E. Kip, D. E. Kelley, B. D. Johnson, L. J. Shaw, C. N. Bairey Merz, B. L. Sharaf, C. J. Pepine, G. Sopko, S. E. Reis, et al. Metabolic Syndrome Modifies the Cardiovascular Risk Associated With Angiographic Coronary Artery Disease in Women: A Report From the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation Circulation, February 17, 2004; 109(6): 714 - 721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. C. Deedwania Metabolic Syndrome and Vascular Disease: Is Nature or Nurture Leading the New Epidemic of Cardiovascular Disease? Circulation, January 6, 2004; 109(1): 2 - 4. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |