Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2003;108:1422-1424
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000089505.34741.E5
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, P. W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Grundy, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, P. W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Grundy, S. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Metabolic Syndrome
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrow Lipids
Right arrow Obesity

(Circulation. 2003;108:1422.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinician Update

The Metabolic Syndrome

Practical Guide to Origins and Treatment: Part I

Peter W. F. Wilson, MD; Scott M. Grundy, MD, PhD

From the Framingham Heart Study of the National Heart, Blood, and Lung Institute, Boston, Mass.

Correspondence to Boston University School of Medicine, 715 Albany St, Evans 204, Boston, MA 02118. E-mail pwilson{at}bu.edu


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
*Introduction
down arrowCardiovascular Risk Assessment...
down arrowAbdominal Adiposity
down arrowReferences
 
The metabolic syndrome (MetS), a cluster of metabolic abnormalities with insulin resistance as a major characteristic, has gone by several names over the past two decades. The diagnostic criteria proposed by the Adult Treatment Program III (ATP III) of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) have led to greater awareness of the components and treatment strategies.1 Five diagnostic traits are listed in the ATP III version of the MetS (Table; referred to as the "metabolic syndrome"), and the presence of any 3 of these factors is considered sufficient for diagnosis. This practical review will consider each in turn, providing advice for cardiologists, internists, and other health care providers who are diagnosing and treating persons with the syndrome in an effort to prevent a variety of clinical outcomes.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Diagnostic Criteria for the Metabolic Syndrome

The major adverse consequence of the MetS is cardiovascular disease (CVD). Several of the metabolic abnormalities associated with the syndrome, in fact, are CVD risk factors. One of these abnormalities, insulin resistance, also predisposes to the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

In age-adjusted estimates from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III in 1998 to 1994, approximately 24% of adult Americans had >=3 of the 5 MetS criteria. Key determinants of greater prevalence were age and ethnicity. Prevalence rates were highest in Mexican Americans and were successively lower in white, African American and other racial groups.2 These published estimates included persons with diabetes mellitus who had met the 1998 fasting glucose criteria (>=126 mg/dL [8.0 mmol/L]) of the American Diabetes Association.3 This article will focus on the features of the MetS in persons without diabetes mellitus, although most persons with T2DM also have the MetS. Moreover, the therapeutic approaches to metabolic risk factors described here also can be applied to most patients with T2DM.


*    Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Patients With MetS
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
*Cardiovascular Risk Assessment...
down arrowAbdominal Adiposity
down arrowReferences
 
The intensity of management of risk factors in the MetS depends in part on assessment of the patient’s global risk for CVD, particularly coronary heart disease (CHD). Patients at higher risk deserve more aggressive risk-reduction therapy. According to ATP III guidelines, risk assessment is best carried out using Framingham risk scoring. Some clinicians have the mistaken impression that the presence of the MetS indicates that a patient has a high-risk status, similar to patients with established CHD or T2DM. Such is not the case. Absolute risk in patients with MetS is variable, and some patients are at only moderate or moderately high risk for CHD.

Some of the risk factors listed for the MetS are not included in Framingham risk scoring. These include abdominal obesity, a proinflammatory state (high levels of C-reactive protein), impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance, and a prothrombotic state (high levels of fibrinogen). ATP III guidelines do not recommend routine measurement of these emerging risk factors, but they are listed as optional measures. If they are found to be abnormal in patients with characteristics of the MetS, the physician has the option to adjust risk higher than estimated from Framingham risk scoring. This approach, however, is somewhat problematic because reliable, quantitative adjustments to risk have not been developed.


*    Abdominal Adiposity
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowCardiovascular Risk Assessment...
*Abdominal Adiposity
down arrowReferences
 
What Is the Background?
Several decades ago it was recognized by European investigators that abdominal adiposity was related to greater risk of cardiovascular events.4,5 The first investigations focused on the ratio of waist/hip girth as the critical measurement. More recent studies have shown that greater waist circumference alone is related to an increase in cardiovascular events, greater fasting insulin levels, increased insulin resistance in metabolic ward studies, and increased abdominal fat assessed by modern techniques such as computerized tomographic scanning.6

Traditional measures of determining adiposity, such as relative weight tables circulated by insurance providers, are important determinants of a variety of cardiovascular risk factors, especially hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia.7–9 Body mass index (BMI), the weight in kilograms divided by the height in meters squared, has become the measure commonly used to assess total adiposity and is thought to play a secondary role behind abdominal adiposity in the development of several metabolic risk processes. Investigators who have studied the effects of total obesity (BMI) and abdominal obesity (waist or waist/hip measurements) on outcomes, have typically found that both measures of obesity increase risk of heart disease and diabetes mellitus.6,7,10

How Do You Make the Diagnosis?
Three simple measurements should be made on all patients, as follows: height, weight, and maximal abdominal girth using a tape measure. The body mass should be calculated or read off a chart, and the physician should inform the patient of his or her category: normal (BMI 18.5 to 25 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25 to 30 kg/m2), or obese (BMI >30 kg/m2). An increased waist girth (>= 35 in [88 cm] for women, >= 40 in [103 cm] for men) defines excess abdominal adiposity according to the ATP III criteria. Slightly different criteria are being considered in other populations, especially among Asians. The appropriate time to do this is at the time of an initial visit.

What Are the Treatment Options for Excess Adiposity in the MetS?
A weight-reduction diet should be prescribed for obese patients. Various strategies are available, but the most common approach for overweight persons who may have the MetS is a balanced-calorie diet. If this diet prescription is followed, the patient would be expected to gradually approach a normal weight category. A typical prescription would be to estimate the patient’s current needs with a dietary and physical activity history. A reduction in calories by approximately 500 cal/d is often an acceptable strategy to achieve the goal of an ideal weight. Take the example of a sedentary woman, 50 years of age, height 66 inches, weight 190 pounds, BMI 29 kg/m2, and no reported exercise. By the Harris-Benedict equation, the usual caloric intake would be estimated at 1556 cal/d.11 Dietary consumption of 1050 cal/d, a 500 cal/d lower intake, with no change in exercise would be expected to lead to a weight loss of approximately one pound a week. The ideal weight target for this woman would be 129 pounds. A panel of obesity experts has recommended an initial goal of weight loss as approximately 10% of baseline and a reasonable time to achieve this goal as 6 months.12 As discussed in more detail below, this diet should also follow guidelines for cholesterol (<300 g/d) and fat intake (25% to 35% calories as fat) as set forward in the NCEP ATP III guidelines.

More aggressive approaches are possible for obese individuals and in special situations. Such care is typically provided in a weight loss clinic. Very restrictive diets for weight management include other treatment options, usually overseen by an obesity specialist. One of the options is a very low-calorie liquid diet of 500 to 1200 calories/d and requiring intensive outpatient medical supervision and laboratory monitoring of electrolyte levels and liver function. Unfortunately, long-term maintenance of lost weight has been problematic. Weight is usually regained, and behavioral modification and physical activity components are underprescribed by healthcare providers.13

Pharmacological agents are available to treat persons with excess adiposity. The 2 main classes of agents are appetite suppressants and inhibitors of nutrient absorption.14 In the appetite suppressant group, common choices include phentermine derivatives (noradrenergic) and sibutramine (inhibitor of serotonin reuptake and norepinephrine). These agents are usually taken in the late morning, lead to decreased appetite in the late afternoon and evening, and may have side effects related to noradrenergic excess. In the nutrient inhibitor class, orlistat (an inhibitor of gastrointestinal lipase) is the only medication currently available. It prevents the absorption of approximately 30% of the fat that is consumed and must be taken at the time of the fat consumption. Undesirable side effects such as flatulence and oil leakage in the stool often occur early in the course of treatment with this medication. Each of these weight loss medications is typically used as a single agent. The expected weight loss varies greatly but is typically 5% to 10% of initial weight. In randomized clinical trials, orlistat in obese persons with T2DM at baseline led to improved glycemic control15,16 and a weight reduction of 6% over 1 year versus 4% weight loss with placebo.15 A recently published meta-analysis concerning the efficacy of pharmacological agents for obesity reported that average weight loss was approximately 4 kilograms more than for placebo users and that no drug or class of drugs was clearly superior.17 Many persons who do not respond to weight loss diet or medications are candidates for weight loss surgery if they are extremely obese (BMI >40 kg/m2) or if they have a BMI >35 to 40 kg/m2 and one or more comorbid conditions, items that are typical elements of the MetS.

A successful surgical program to treat obesity includes psychological profiling and extensive preoperative screening for conditions such as prior coronary artery disease. One of the most popular and effective procedures is a vertically banded gastric bypass surgery, and weight typically declines 40% at 1 year and 62% at 5 years.18 Several components of the MetS usually improve in concert with weight loss after surgery, including lipids and glucose levels, but assiduous follow-up is needed. Monitoring of vitamin and hematologic status, adherence to specific postoperative dietary instructions, and psychological issues are important for long-term success after weight loss surgery. Laparoscopic techniques that include putting a collar around the proximal end of the stomach are now available. The noninvasive methods have been associated with less weight loss, and their long-term utility has still not been fully evaluated.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by NIH/NHLBI contract N01-HC-38038, NIH grant AR/AG 41398, and a grant from Roche Laboratories.


*    Footnotes
 
This article is part I of a 2-part article. Part II will appear in the September 30, 2003 issue of Circulation.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowCardiovascular Risk Assessment...
up arrowAbdominal Adiposity
*References
 

  1. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001; 285: 2486–2497.[Free Full Text]
  2. Ford ES, Giles WH, Dietz WH. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among US adults: findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA. 2002; 287: 356–359.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1997; 20: 1183–1197.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Vague J, Vague P, Tramoni M, et al. Obesity and diabetes. Acta Diabetol Lat. 1980; 17: 87–99.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Bjorntorp P. The associations between obesity, adipose tissue distribution and disease. Acta Med Scand Suppl. 1988; 723: 121–134.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Despres JP. Abdominal obesity and the risk of coronary artery disease. Can J Cardiol. 1992; 8: 561–562.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Ohlson LO, Larsson B, Svardsudd K, et al. The influence of body fat distribution on the incidence of diabetes mellitus: 13.5 years of follow-up of the participants in the study of men born in 1913. Diabetes. 1985; 34: 1055–1058.[Abstract]
  8. Wilson PW, Kannel WB. Obesity, diabetes, and risk of cardiovascular disease in the elderly. Am J Geriatr Cardiol. 2002; 11: 119–123.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Kenchaiah S, Evans JC, Levy D, et al. Obesity and the risk of heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 305–313.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Despres JP. Abdominal obesity as an important component of insulin-resistance syndrome. Nutrition. 1993; 9: 452–459.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Santiago MC, Leon AS, Serfass RC. Failure of 40 weeks of brisk walking to alter blood lipids in normolipemic women. Can J Appl Physiol. 1995; 20: 417–428.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults. Bethesda, Md: US Public Health Service, NIH, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 1998.
  13. Poston WS, Haddock CK, Dill PL, et al. Lifestyle treatments in randomized clinical trials of pharmacotherapies for obesity. Obes Res. 2001; 9: 552–563.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Yanovski SZ, Yanovski JA. Obesity. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 591–602.[Free Full Text]
  15. Hollander PA, Elbein SC, Hirsch IB, et al. Role of orlistat in the treatment of obese patients with type 2 diabetes: a 1-year randomized double-blind study. Diabetes Care. 1998; 21: 1288–1294.[Abstract]
  16. Miles JM, Leiter L, Hollander P, et al. Effect of orlistat in overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25: 1123–1128.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Haddock CK, Poston WS, Dill PL, et al. Pharmacotherapy for obesity: a quantitative analysis of four decades of published randomized clinical trials. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002; 26: 262–273.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Capella JF, Capella RF. The weight reduction operation of choice: vertical banded gastroplasty or gastric bypass? Am J Surg. 1996; 171: 74–79.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
T. Yanagiya, A. Tanabe, A. Iida, S. Saito, A. Sekine, A. Takahashi, T. Tsunoda, S. Kamohara, Y. Nakata, K. Kotani, et al.
Association of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in MTMR9 gene with obesity
Hum. Mol. Genet., December 15, 2007; 16(24): 3017 - 3026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
C A Daly, P Hildebrandt, M Bertrand, R Ferrari, W Remme, M Simoons, K M Fox, and on behalf of the EUROPA investigators
Adverse prognosis associated with the metabolic syndrome in established coronary artery disease: data from the EUROPA trial
Heart, November 1, 2007; 93(11): 1406 - 1411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular DiseaseHome page
C. Schindler
Review: The metabolic syndrome as an endocrine disease: is there an effective pharmacotherapeutic strategy optimally targeting the pathogenesis?
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, October 1, 2007; 1(1): 7 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
A. Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou, G. S Metsios, Y. Koutedakis, A. M Nevill, K. M Douglas, A. Jamurtas, J. J C S V. van Zanten, M. Labib, and G. D Kitas
Redefining overweight and obesity in rheumatoid arthritis patients
Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2007; 66(10): 1316 - 1321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. Mukuddem-Petersen, M. B Snijder, R. M van Dam, J. M Dekker, L. M Bouter, C. D. Stehouwer, R. J Heine, G. Nijpels, and J. C Seidell
Sagittal abdominal diameter: no advantage compared with other anthropometric measures as a correlate of components of the metabolic syndrome in elderly from the Hoorn Study.
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2006; 84(5): 995 - 1002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci.Home page
L. A. Yancura, C. M. Aldwin, M. R. Levenson, and A. Spiro III
Coping, affect, and the metabolic syndrome in older men: how does coping get under the skin?
J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., September 1, 2006; 61(5): P295 - P303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
R. Kahn, J. Buse, E. Ferrannini, and M. Stern
The Metabolic Syndrome: Time for a Critical Appraisal: Joint statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes
Diabetes Care, September 1, 2005; 28(9): 2289 - 2304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
R. A. Hegele and R. L. Pollex
Genetic and physiological insights into the metabolic syndrome
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2005; 289(3): R663 - R669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
Y. Song, P. M. Ridker, J. E. Manson, N. R. Cook, J. E. Buring, and S. Liu
Magnesium Intake, C-Reactive Protein, and the Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Middle-Aged and Older U.S. Women
Diabetes Care, June 1, 2005; 28(6): 1438 - 1444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
G D Kolovou, K K Anagnostopoulou, and D V Cokkinos
Pathophysiology of dyslipidaemia in the metabolic syndrome
Postgrad. Med. J., June 1, 2005; 81(956): 358 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
C. Irace, C. Cortese, E. Fiaschi, C. Carallo, G. Sesti, E. Farinaro, and A. Gnasso
Components of the Metabolic Syndrome and Carotid Atherosclerosis: Role of Elevated Blood Pressure
Hypertension, April 1, 2005; 45(4): 597 - 601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. Angelico, M. Del Ben, R. Conti, S. Francioso, K. Feole, S. Fiorello, M. G. Cavallo, B. Zalunardo, F. Lirussi, C. Alessandri, et al.
Insulin Resistance, the Metabolic Syndrome, and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2005; 90(3): 1578 - 1582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J. A Armitage, I. Y Khan, P. D Taylor, P. W Nathanielsz, and L. Poston
Developmental programming of the metabolic syndrome by maternal nutritional imbalance: how strong is the evidence from experimental models in mammals?
J. Physiol., December 1, 2004; 561(2): 355 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Sinha, G. Perdomo, N. F. Brown, and R. M. O'Doherty
Fatty Acid-induced Insulin Resistance in L6 Myotubes Is Prevented by Inhibition of Activation and Nuclear Localization of Nuclear Factor {kappa}B
J. Biol. Chem., October 1, 2004; 279(40): 41294 - 41301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
O. C. Marroquin, K. E. Kip, D. E. Kelley, B. D. Johnson, L. J. Shaw, C. N. Bairey Merz, B. L. Sharaf, C. J. Pepine, G. Sopko, S. E. Reis, et al.
Metabolic Syndrome Modifies the Cardiovascular Risk Associated With Angiographic Coronary Artery Disease in Women: A Report From the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation
Circulation, February 17, 2004; 109(6): 714 - 721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. C. Deedwania
Metabolic Syndrome and Vascular Disease: Is Nature or Nurture Leading the New Epidemic of Cardiovascular Disease?
Circulation, January 6, 2004; 109(1): 2 - 4.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, P. W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Grundy, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, P. W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Grundy, S. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Metabolic Syndrome
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrow Lipids
Right arrow Obesity