Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2003;108:1202-1207
Published online before print August 25, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000087432.63671.2E
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
108/10/1202    most recent
01.CIR.0000087432.63671.2Ev1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wyss, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kaufmann, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wyss, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kaufmann, P. A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Coronary Artery Disease
Related Collections
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - CV surgery
Right arrow Nuclear cardiology and PET
Right arrow Chronic ischemic heart disease
Right arrow Coronary circulation
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide

(Circulation. 2003;108:1202.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Influence of Altitude Exposure on Coronary Flow Reserve

Christophe A. Wyss, MD*; Pascal Koepfli, MD*; Gregory Fretz, MD; Magdalena Seebauer, PhD; Christian Schirlo, MD; Philipp A. Kaufmann, MD

From the Department of Cardiology, Nuclear Cardiology Unit (C.A.W., P.K., G.F., P.A.K.), University Hospital, and the Institute of Physiology (M.S., C.S.), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Correspondence to P.A. Kaufmann, MD, Head, Nuclear Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Cardiology C NUK 32, University Hospital, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland. E-mail pak{at}usz.ch

Received October 7, 2002; de novo received April 8, 2003; revision received June 17, 2003; accepted June 18, 2003.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Although no data exist on the effect of altitude exposure on coronary flow reserve (CFR), patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) are advised not to exceed moderate altitudes of {approx}2500 m above sea level. We studied the influence of altitude on myocardial blood flow (MBF) in controls and CAD patients.

Methods and Results— In 10 healthy controls and 8 patients with CAD, MBF was measured by positron emission tomography and 15O-labeled water at rest, during adenosine stress, and after supine bicycle exercise. This protocol was repeated during inhalation of a hypoxic gas mixture corresponding to an altitude of 4500 m (controls) and 2500 m (CAD). Workload was targeted to comparable heart rate–blood pressure products at normoxia and hypoxia. Resting MBF increased significantly in controls at 4500 m (+24%, P<0.01) and in CAD patients at 2500 m (+24%, P<0.05). Altitude had no influence on adenosine-induced hyperemia and CFR. Exercise-induced hyperemia increased significantly in controls (+38%, P<0.01) at 4500 m (despite a reduction in workload, -28%, P<0.0001) but not in CAD patients at 2500 m (moderate decrease in workload, -11%, P<0.05). Exercise-induced reserve was preserved in controls (+10%, P=NS) but decreased in CAD patients (-18%, P<0.005).

Conclusions— At 2500 m altitude, there is a significant decrease in exercise-induced reserve in CAD patients, indicating that compensatory mechanisms might be exhausted even at moderate altitudes, whereas healthy controls have preserved reserve up to 4500 m. Thus, patients with CAD and impaired CFR should be cautious when performing physical exercise even at moderate altitude.


Key Words: blood flow • hypoxia • exercise • coronary disease • tomography


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Respiratory, circulatory, and ECG changes have been extensively described in previous studies during standardized exposure to high altitude.1 In patients with marginal cardiocirculatory function, these effects are potentially dangerous and might lead to cardiac decompensation. In patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and a history of myocardial infarction, an increase in episodes of silent ischemia was found at an altitude of 2000 m not only during physical activities but also during normal daily activities.2 For safety reasons, it is therefore current clinical practice to advise patients with CAD not to exceed moderate altitudes of {approx}2000 to 2500 m.3 Because similar conditions are encountered in most airplanes during flight, concerns have been raised about the risk of air travel for certain patients with CAD.4

In experimental animals, acute5 and chronic hypoxemia have been shown to increase baseline6 as well as maximal7 pharmacologically and exercise-induced6 myocardial blood flow (MBF). By contrast, in humans, only scant data exist on the influence of acute hypoxia on coronary circulation. A close relation between cardiac effort, myocardial O2 consumption, and coronary flow has been repeatedly reported.7,8 Because most of the O2 is normally removed from the coronary blood, an increase in O2 delivery must be achieved primarily by increased MBF. We have recently reported that high-altitude exposure increases resting MBF in healthy controls.9 It remains unclear, however, how this affects coronary flow reserve (CFR). Thus, the aim of the present study was to assess the influence of altitude exposure on adenosine- and physical exercise–induced, hyperemic MBF and CFR in nonacclimated healthy controls and in CAD patients.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Study Population
The control group consisted of 10 healthy, nonacclimated, male volunteers (mean age, 23±2 years; range, 21 to 27 years). None of the subjects had a history of cardiovascular disease or smoking. Further inclusion criteria were normal heart rate, blood pressure, and ECG and a low probability for CAD.10

The patient group included 8 nonacclimated, male patients (mean age, 56±9 years; range, 42 to 69 years) with angiographically documented CAD, ie, a luminal area stenosis of >50% in 1 (3 patients), 2 (4 patients), or 3 (1 patient) coronary vessels. All patients had stable CAD in the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) functional class II to III. Only patients with mild (>50% to 70%) or moderate (>70% to 90%) lesions were included. All study participants reside at an altitude of {approx}450 m and had not been exposed to higher altitudes for at least 6 weeks before the study.

Study Protocol
With the subject’s feet attached to a bicycle ergometer (model 380 B, Siemens-Elema AG), MBF was measured at rest and was repeated during adenosine-induced hyperemia after a 10-minute period to allow for decay of the 15O radioactivity in the body. Adenosine was infused for 7 minutes at 140 µg · kg body weight-1 · min-1 according to standard practice.11 Three minutes after beginning the adenosine infusion, hyperemic MBF measurement was started. After a 10-minute interval, exercise started at 50 to 75 W with workload increments of 25 to 50 W to reach 70% of the predicted value for upright bicycle exercise within a comparable time period in all subjects. MBF was measured immediately after the end of exercise, as previously documented.12 Patient positioning for each image set was aided by marking the patient’s chest with a felt-tip pen and aligning the marks with the reference laser beam of the tomograph. A 20-minute transmission scan was then acquired for the purpose of attenuation correction of all emission scans and which allowed for recovery of the subjects after physical exercise. All measurements were subsequently repeated during hypoxia that simulated the respective altitude. This study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of the University Hospital Zurich, and radiation exposure was licensed by the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health, Division of Radioprotection. All subjects gave informed, written consent before the study.

Altitude Simulation
Altitude (hypoxia) was simulated by inhalation of a hypoxic gas mixture (through a mouthpiece), consisting of {approx}16.5% O2 and 12.5% N2, resulting in O2 pressures of 119 mm Hg and 90 mm Hg, which corresponded to altitudes of 2500 m and 4500 m, respectively. Heart rate and peripheral arterial O2 saturation (SaO2) were recorded with a finger pulse oximeter (Nellcor N-200E, Nellcor Inc). Blood pressure was continuously monitored with a monitor (Finapres BP monitor, BOC Inc) and recorded at 1-minute intervals. The ECG was monitored continuously, and a 12-lead ECG was recorded at baseline and every minute during adenosine administration, as well as at each exercise level and during the 10 minutes of recovery. Additionally, the end-tidal partial pressure of CO2 (PetCO2) and respiratory frequency were determined with a capnograph (Capnodig, Dräger). After a cardiorespiratory steady state was achieved, as assessed by a steady PetCO2, SaO2, and heart rate, positron emission tomography (PET) measurements were performed.9 For safety reasons, CAD patients were only exposed to a simulated altitude of 2500 m, whereas volunteers were exposed to a simulated altitude of 4500 m. Cardiorespiratory reactions during normobaric hypoxia and altitude have been shown to be identical for at least the first hours of exposure.13

Image Acquisition
Scanning was performed at the PET Center of the University Hospital, Zurich, on a PET system (GE Advance, GE Medical Systems), which records 35 image planes simultaneously. The axial field of view was 14.5 cm. A 30-minute blank scan was recorded as part of the daily routine procedures. The optimal imaging position was determined by a 2-minute rectilinear scan after exposure of an external 68Ge ring source. An intravenous bolus of [15O]water (500 to 700 MBq) was infused over 20 seconds at rate of 10 mL/min to assess MBF. The line was then flushed for another 2 minutes. The dynamic image sequences were 14x5, 3x10, 3x20, and 4x30 seconds.

Image Processing
The sinograms were corrected for attenuation and reconstructed on a computer workstation (Sun workstation, Sun Microsystems). Images were transferred to another computer (Transtec 2200PC computer, Transtec AG) and analyzed with the PMOD software package (www.pmod.ch), as previously validated.12 Myocardial images were then generated directly from the dynamic [15O]water study to draw regions of interest, thus avoiding the need for additional [15O]CO blood pool scans. In brief, the factor sinograms were generated by means of linear dimension reduction of the dynamic sinograms, where the required variate and covariate factors (the myocardial and blood time-activity curves) were modeled from the lung time-activity curve as previously reported.14 The regions were drawn semiautomatically by using a centerline within the myocardium. The junctions of right and left ventricles were marked to indicate the septum. The left ventricular free wall was then subdivided geometrically into 3 segments of the same size. Arterial and tissue activity curves were fitted to a single tissue compartment tracer-kinetic model to give values of regional and global MBF (in mL · min-1 · g-1), as previously described.15–17 For the present analysis, the segments were grouped to obtain a value for those segments supplied by stenosed vessels and a value for a remote segment (in CAD patients), as well as a mean global value for the entire left ventricle (in controls and CAD patients).

CFR and Exercise-Induced Reserve
CFR was defined as the ratio of MBF during pharmacological hyperemia to MBF at rest and was calculated at baseline and during hypoxia. Similarly, exercise-induced reserve was defined as the ratio of MBF after bicycle exercise stress to MBF at rest. MBF utilization after exercise was expressed as a percentage of maximal hyperemic flow during pharmacological stress to indicate how much of the maximal (adenosine-induced) hyperemia could be achieved by bicycle stress. O2 delivery to myocardial tissue was calculated for the remote and stenotic segments in CAD patients as hemoglobin (g/L)xSaO2 (%)xMBF (mL · min-1 · g-1)x1.34 (mL O2/g hemoglobin).

Statistical Analysis
Mean values are given with their SD. Comparisons of hemodynamic and MBF values between the different study conditions were performed by ANOVA statistics for repeated measures. When the value for P was <0.05, Sheffe’s procedure was applied. For paired comparison of stenotic versus remote segments within the CAD patients, a paired t test was used.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Hemodynamic, ECG, and Clinical Findings
In both groups, heart rate and rate-pressure product (RPP) at rest increased significantly during hypoxia. The adenosine-induced increase in RPP during hypoxia was more pronounced in CAD patients. In controls, RPP at maximal exercise was similar at normoxia (21 193±2012 mm Hgxbpm) and at hypoxia (21 138±2690 mm Hgxbpm, P=NS) according to the study protocol, whereas workload decreased significantly, from 134±19 to 96±16 W (-28%, P<0.0001). Similarly, RPP in CAD patients was not affected by hypoxia (18 141±2250 mm Hgxbpm versus 17 867±3013 mm Hgxbpm, P=NS), whereas workload decreased from 93±16 to 83±19 W (-11%, P<0.05) at hypoxia (Table 1). At baseline level, 4 of the 8 CAD patients had significant ST-segment depression, whereas all 8 patients had ST-segment depression at simulated altitude. Similarly, 2 of the patients experienced anginal pain at baseline, but 7 did so at altitude. Maximal ST-segment depression averaged 1.5 mm at baseline versus 2.0 mm at hypoxia (P=NS).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Hemodynamics

Respiratory Parameters
There was significant hypoxic hyperventilation in controls at 4500 m, with a decrease in PetCO2 from 37±3 to 33±5 mm Hg (P<0.005) but not in patients at 2500 m (35±5 to 32±6 mm Hg, P=NS). Exercise induced an increase in respiratory frequency, but maximal respiratory frequency was not affected by hypoxia either in controls (20±4/min at baseline versus 20±4/min at 4500 m, P=NS) or in CAD patients (21±6/min versus 20±6/min, P=NS).

MBF, CFR, and Exercise-Induced Reserve
Controls
Mean resting MBF increased significantly (+24%, P<0.01) from baseline (Zurich, 450 m) to 4500 m. Bicycle exercise–induced, hyperemic MBF increased by 38% (P<0.01, Figure 1), whereas adenosine-induced hyperemic MBF showed no significant change at altitude (+11%, P=NS). Adenosine-induced CFR was comparable at normoxia and hypoxia (4.02±1.00 versus 3.48±0.95 mL · min-1 · g-1, P=NS). Similarly, exercise-induced reserve was not affected by hypoxia (1.72±0.31 versus 1.77±0.34 mL · min-1 · g-1, P=NS, Figure 2).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Hypoxia-induced mismatch was found at exercise between MBF and workload.



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Hypoxia induced trend toward increase in exercise-induced reserve in controls but significant decrease in CAD patients.

CAD Patients
Mean resting MBF increased significantly (+24%, P<0.05) from baseline to 2500 m. Adenosine-induced, hyperemic MBF showed a nonsignificant trend (+17%) toward an increase, whereas bicycle exercise–induced, hyperemic MBF was not affected by hypoxia (±0%). As a result, there was no change in adenosine-induced CFR from normoxia to hypoxia (2.26±0.35 versus 2.15±0.58 mL · min-1 · g-1, P=NS). By contrast, bicycle exercise–induced reserve decreased significantly, by -18%, from normoxia to hypoxia (2.13±0.48 versus 1.79±0.63 mL · min-1 · g-1, P<0.005, Table 2 and Figure 2). In controls, MBF utilization was 47±18% at baseline and 49±11% during hypoxia, but MBF was significantly higher in CAD patients, with values of 96±29% and 84±21%, respectively (P<0.0001 versus controls), indicating exhaustion of the available MBF utilization in CAD patients.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. MBF, CFR, and Exercise-Induced Reserve

Segmental Data in CAD Patients
In remote segments, hypoxia induced a significant MBF increase at rest (1.07 versus 1.35 mL · min-1 · g-1, P<0.05) but not during adenosine (2.68 versus 3.46 mL · min-1 · g-1, P=NS) or after bicycle exercise (2.34 versus 2.61 mL · min-1 · g-1, P=NS). Thus, adenosine-induced CFR showed no change (2.50 versus 2.53, P=NS), and exercise-induced reserve tended to decrease slightly (2.24 versus 1.89, P=NS). In stenotic segments, hypoxia induced a significant MBF increase at rest (1.01 versus 1.29 mL · min-1 · g-1, P<0.05) but not during adenosine (2.26 versus 2.49 mL · min-1 · g-1, P=NS). After exercise, there was a nonsignificant decrease in MBF (2.29 versus 2.00 mL · min-1 · g-1, P=NS). Adenosine-induced CFR was unchanged (2.12 versus 1.95, P=NS), whereas exercise-induced reserve decreased significantly by 23% (2.07 versus 1.58, P<0.01). Values for CFR tended to be lower in segments supplied by coronary arteries with more severe lesions (Table 2).

During bicycle exercise, O2 delivery to remote segments of CAD patients was not affected by hypoxia (4.2±1.4 mL O2 · min-1 · g-1 myocardial tissue at normoxia versus 4.4±2.4 mL O2 · min-1 · g-1, P=NS), whereas it decreased significantly in stenotic segments, from 4.2±1.6 to 3.3±0.8 mL O2 · min-1 · g-1 (P<0.05 versus normoxia and versus remote, Figure 3).



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Myocardial O2 delivery (mean±SEM) in CAD patients at exercise is significantly reduced in stenotic segments versus remote and versus normoxia (baseline, P<0.05).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Our data show that in healthy humans, resting and—even more pronounced—exercise-induced MBF increases at high altitudes, indicating a maintained exercise-induced reserve up to an altitude of 4500 m. By contrast, in patients with CAD, compensatory mechanisms appear to be exhausted even at moderate altitudes, because their bicycle exercise–induced reserve was decreased even at 2500 m, whereas adenosine-induced CFR remained unchanged in both groups.

Resting MBF in healthy volunteers increased significantly at high altitude, confirming our previous results.10 Because MBF is mainly determined by cardiac workload (ie, RPP) at rest and during physical exercise,17 bicycle exercise workload at altitude was increased stepwise to target the same RPP as at normoxia to allow comparison of both hyperemic MBF responses. In controls, exercise-induced hyperemia at altitude was significantly increased by 38% (P<0.01) compared with normoxia, although target RPP was reached at a significantly lower workload level (-28%, P<0.0001), probably due to hypoxia-induced sympathetic activation, which might also increase myocardial contractility. This is in agreement with previous invasive measurements by Kaijser and coworkers,18 who found that during physical exercise, the hypoxia-induced reduction in O2 content was compensated for mainly by an increase in MBF of 33%. So far, no data are available for patients with CAD. Despite this lack of data, patients with CAD are generally advised to restrict their physical activity at altitude without exceeding the maximal heart rate corresponding to the symptom-limiting degree of physical stress usually attained at low altitude.3 The present results show that this heart rate–controlled advice is potentially hazardous. Although for the same heart rate less workload is performed at altitude, an increase in MBF is required, which seems to be unavailable to patients with CAD, who showed no increase in exercise-induced hyperemia. The resulting decrease in exercise-induced reserve cannot be explained by fixed coronary stenosis, because adenosine CFR was unaffected by hypoxia, but rather by pathological, exercise-induced vasomotion. This is in line with several previous reports by our group that have shown that bicycle exercise induces dilation of normal but constriction of stenotic coronary arteries in humans19–22 and is supported in the present study by the trend of an increased exercise-induced hyperemic MBF with no change in flow reserve in remote segments as opposed to a slight decrease in MBF in stenotic segments, resulting in a significant decrease in exercise-induced reserve. This was more pronounced in more severe lesions and was paralleled by a significant decrease in O2 delivery to stenotic segments but not to remote segments, indicating that compensatory mechanisms appear to be exhausted in CAD patients, even with moderate lesion severity and at a moderate altitude of 2500 m, which corresponds to the cabin pressure in most airlines during flight. Although passengers do not generally exert much physical exercise throughout most of the flight, our findings might still raise some concerns about the safety of CAD patients during air travel. In many passengers with cardiopulmonary disease, the PaO2 at sea level is <95 mm Hg and is on the steep portion of the oxyhemoglobin-dissociation curve; at ordinary cabin pressures, the O2 saturation might fall dramatically. For them, routine cabin pressures increase the risk of hypobaric hypoxia.23 The clinical importance of our results also lies in the fact that a substantial portion of the middle- and older-age population remains physically active, participating in sports at altitudes, such as skiing.24

We have used bicycle exercise stress for stimulation of hyperemic MBF as a physiological stimulus reflecting the natural response of the coronary arteries, whereas a pharmacological stimulus alone might have been of limited value in the assessment of pathophysiological changes.24–27 Furthermore, the importance of a physiological exercise stress test as a powerful predictor of outcome and mortality has been recently confirmed in a large, long-term trial.28 However, only very few reports in the literature deal with the use of physical exercise in PET,29–31 and only recently has its reproducibility been documented.18 In the present study, exercise-induced, hyperemic flow was higher in patients than in controls, possibly indicating an uncoupling of MBF and cardiac work due to inefficient contractility of the ischemic heart. In fact, as patients had a significantly decreased maximal adenosine-induced MBF, they utilized {approx}90% of their available maximal MBF during physical exercise. By contrast, controls utilized <50% of their maximal MBF.

A first limitation of the present study is that subjects did not exercise at their maximal level of effort owing to the fact that exercise workload in the supine position usually matches {approx}70% of the workload achieved in the upright position.25–27 In addition, physical capacity at high altitudes of 5000 m has been found to match 70% of the capacity at sea level.32

Second, data were acquired in the immediate postexercise period, when the cardiac power output is considerably decreased and when flow is also expected to fall rapidly. These suboptimal conditions were chosen as a compromise to permit the subjects’ recovery after exercise within a reasonable time and to avoid excessive motion artifact during scanning, but it might have diminished hypoxia-induced changes. However, the fact that every subject served as his own control strengthens our results.

Third, the age in CAD patients was higher than in controls, and no women were included. However, no sex difference and no difference in the physiological response to hypoxia over a wide age range from 8 to 83 years have been reported.33 We have previously found, for a large number of subjects, that resting MBF was slightly higher in women than in men but that no sex differences existed during hyperemia.34 Thus, although we have no data on female volunteers in the present study, one can reasonably anticipate that potential sex differences would not have significantly changed our results with regard to stress perfusion measurement.

Finally, exercise induced an increase in respiratory rate, which could have affected MBF measurements. Because maximal respiratory rate was not affected by hypoxia in either group and each individual served as his own control, changes in respiratory rate might not have significantly affected measurements, although no respiratory gating was performed. This is in line with the fact that no respiratory gating is performed for routine adenosine stress, although tachypnea occurs in one third of patients.11

In conclusion, our results show that exercise-induced flow reserve is maintained in healthy volunteers during high-altitude exposure, whereas it is significantly decreased in CAD patients, even at moderate altitude. These findings might support the concept that patients with reduced CFR, as observed in CAD, should be warned to refrain from physical exercise, even at exposure to moderate altitudes.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Philipp A. Kaufmann was funded by a grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) (SCORE B, grant No. 3232-055002.98 and SNSF Professorship) and supported by a grant from the Emdo Stiftung Zurich and the Radiumfonds für Krebsforschung. We thank Thomas Berthold and his radiographic team for their excellent technical assistance.


*    Footnotes
 
*The first 2 authors equally contributed to the present project. Back


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Laciga P, Koller EA. Respiratory, circulatory, and ECG changes during acute exposure to high altitude. J Appl Physiol. 1976; 41: 159–167.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Volker K, Hoppe B, Krestin M, et al. Cross-country and downhill skiing in patients with myocardial infarct: can silent ischemia be prevented by drug therapy? Fortschr Med. 1990; 108: 273–275.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Alexander JK. Coronary problems associated with altitude and air travel. Cardiol Clin. 1995; 13: 271–278.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Beighton PH, Richards PR. Cardiovascular disease in air travellers. Br Heart J. 1968; 30: 367–372.[Free Full Text]

5. Manohar M, Parks CM, Busch MA, et al. Regional myocardial blood flow and coronary vascular reserve in unanesthetized young calves exposed to a simulated altitude of 3500 m for 8–10 weeks. Circ Res. 1982; 50: 714–726.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Reller MD, Morton MJ, Giraud GD, et al. Maximal myocardial blood flow is enhanced by chronic hypoxemia in late gestation fetal sheep. Am J Physiol. 1992; 263: H1327–H1329.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Korner PI. Circulatory adaptations in hypoxia. Physiol Rev. 1959; 39: 687–730.[Free Full Text]

8. Katz LM, Feinberg H. The relation of cardiac effort to myocardial oxygen consumption and coronary flow. Circ Res. 1958; 6: 656–669.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Kaufmann PA, Schirlo C, Pavlicek V, et al. Increased myocardial blood flow during acute exposure to simulated altitudes. J Nucl Cardiol. 2001; 8: 158–164.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Diamond G, Forrester J. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1979; 300: 1350–1358.[Abstract]

11. Cerqueira MD, Verain MS, Schwaiger M, et al. Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: results from the Adenoscan Multicenter Trial Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 23: 384–389.[Abstract]

12. Wyss CA, Koepfli P, Mikolajczyk K, et al. Reproducibility and comparison of coronary flow reserve assessed with PET using bicycle exercise versus adenosine stress. J Nucl Med. 2003; 44: 146–154.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Loeppky JA, Sotto P, Roach RC. Acute ventilatory response to simulated altitude, normobaric hypoxia and hypobaria. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1996; 67: 1019–1022.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Kaufmann PA, Gnecchi-Ruscone T, Yap JT, et al. Assessment of the reproducibility of baseline and hyperemic myocardial blood flow measurement with 15O-labeled water and PET. J Nucl Med. 1999; 40: 1848–1856.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Uren NG, Melin JA, De BB, et al. Relation between myocardial blood flow and the severity of coronary artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1994; 330: 1782–1788.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Kaufmann PA, Gnecchi-Ruscone T, di Terlizzi M, et al. Coronary heart disease in smokers: vitamin C restores coronary microcirculatory function. Circulation. 2000; 102: 1233–1238.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Kaufmann PA, Gnecchi-Ruscone T, Schäfers KP, et al. Low density lipoprotein cholesterol and coronary microvascular dysfunction in hypercholesterolemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 103–109.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Kaijser L, Grubbstrom J, Berglund B. Coronary circulation in acute hypoxia. Clin Physiol. 1990; 10: 259–263.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Kaufmann P, Vassalli G, Utzinger U, et al. Coronary vasomotion during dynamic exercise: influence of intravenous and intracoronary nicardipine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 26: 624–631.[Abstract]

20. Frielingsdorf J, Seiler C, Kaufmann P, et al. Normalization of abnormal coronary vasomotion by calcium antagonists in patients with hypertension. Circulation. 1996; 93: 1380–1387.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Mandinov L, Kaufmann P, Staub D, et al. Coronary vasomotion after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty depends on the severity of the culprit lesion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 30: 682–688.[Abstract]

22. Kaufmann PA, Frielingsdorf J, Mandinov L, et al. Reversal of abnormal coronary vasomotion by calcium antagonists in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Circulation. 1998; 97: 1348–1354.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Gendreau MA, DeJohn C. Responding to medical events during commercial airline flights. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 1067–1073.[Free Full Text]

24. Smith SC Jr, Dove JT, Jacobs AK, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention: executive summary and recommendations: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 2215–2238.[Free Full Text]

25. Kaufmann P, Vassalli G, Utzinger U, et al. Coronary vasomotion during dynamic exercise: influence of intravenous and intracoronary nicardipine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 26: 624–631.[Abstract]

26. Kaufmann P, Mandinov L, Hess OM. Coronary stenosis vasoconstriction: impact on myocardial ischaemia. Eur Heart J. 1997; 18: 1853–1859.[Free Full Text]

27. Kaufmann P, Frielingsdorf J, Mandinov L, et al. Influence of the culprit lesion on clinical symptoms of coronary artery disease, with special emphasis on exercise data. Coron Artery Dis. 1998; 9: 185–190.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Meyers J, Prakash M, Froelicher V, et al. Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346; 793–801.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Tamaki N, Yonekura Y, Senda M, et al. Myocardial positron computed tomography with 13N-ammonia at rest and during exercise. Eur J Nucl Med. 1985; 11: 246–251.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Nienaber CA, Gambhir SS, Mody FV, et al. Regional myocardial blood flow and glucose utilization in symptomatic patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1993; 87: 1580–1590.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Muller P, Czernin J, Choi Y, et al. Effect of exercise supplementation during adenosine infusion on hyperemic blood flow and flow reserve. Am Heart J. 1994; 128: 52–68.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Sauter J, Kopp KH. Veränderungen des Herz-Kreislaufsystems in der Höhe. Anästhesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2001; 36: 299–301.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Veglio M, Maule S, Cametti G, et al. The effects of exposure to moderate altitude on cardiovascular autonomic function in normal subjects. Clin Autonom Res. 1999; 9: 123–127.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Chareonthaitawee P, Kaufmann PA, Rimoldi O, et al. Heterogeneity of resting and hyperemic myocardial blood flow in healthy humans. Cardiovasc Res. 2001; 50: 151–161.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Koepfli, C. A. Wyss, O. Gaemperli, P. T. Siegrist, M. Klainguti, T. Schepis, M. Namdar, M. Bechir, T. Hoefflinghaus, F. Duru, et al.
Left bundle branch block causes relative but not absolute septal underperfusion during exercise
Eur. Heart J., September 5, 2009; (2009) ehp372v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. A. Herzog, L. Husmann, I. Valenta, O. Gaemperli, P. T. Siegrist, F. M. Tay, N. Burkhard, C. A. Wyss, and P. A. Kaufmann
Long-Term Prognostic Value of (13)N-Ammonia Myocardial Perfusion Positron Emission Tomography Added Value of Coronary Flow Reserve.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 7, 2009; 54(2): 150 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
D. J. Duncker and R. J. Bache
Regulation of Coronary Blood Flow During Exercise
Physiol Rev, July 1, 2008; 88(3): 1009 - 1086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
B. A. Kaufmann, A. M. Bernheim, S. Kiencke, M. Fischler, J. Sklenar, H. Mairbaurl, M. Maggiorini, and H. P. Brunner-La Rocca
Evidence supportive of impaired myocardial blood flow reserve at high altitude in subjects developing high-altitude pulmonary edema
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): H1651 - H1657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Bartsch and J. S. R. Gibbs
Effect of Altitude on the Heart and the Lungs
Circulation, November 6, 2007; 116(19): 2191 - 2202.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
P. A. Kaufmann, O. E. Rimoldi, T. Gnecchi-Ruscone, T. F. Luscher, and P. G. Camici
Systemic nitric oxide synthase inhibition improves coronary flow reserve to adenosine in patients with significant stenoses
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): H2178 - H2182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
J-P Schmid, M Noveanu, R Gaillet, G Hellige, A Wahl, and H Saner
Safety and exercise tolerance of acute high altitude exposure (3454 m) among patients with coronary artery disease
Heart, July 1, 2006; 92(7): 921 - 925.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Namdar, P. Koepfli, R. Grathwohl, P. T. Siegrist, M. Klainguti, T. Schepis, R. Delaloye, C. A. Wyss, S. P. Fleischmann, O. Gaemperli, et al.
Caffeine Decreases Exercise-Induced Myocardial Flow Reserve
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 17, 2006; 47(2): 405 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
P. L. Brubaker
Adventure Travel and Type 1 Diabetes: The complicating effects of high altitude
Diabetes Care, October 1, 2005; 28(10): 2563 - 2572.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. Wikstrom, J. Gronros, G. Bergstrom, and L.-m. Gan
Functional and Morphologic Imaging of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Living Mice Using High-Resolution Color Doppler Echocardiography and Ultrasound Biomicroscopy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 16, 2005; 46(4): 720 - 727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
P. A. Kaufmann, M. Namdar, F. Matthew, M. Roffi, S. V. Aschkenasy, B. van der Loo, G. Sutsch, T. F. Luscher, and R. Jenni
Novel Doppler Assessment of Intracoronary Volumetric Flow Reserve: Validation Against PET in Patients With or Without Flow-Dependent Vasodilation
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 1272 - 1277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. A. Kaufmann, O. Rimoldi, T. Gnecchi-Ruscone, R. S. Bonser, T. F. Luscher, and P. G. Camici
Systemic Inhibition of Nitric Oxide Synthase Unmasks Neural Constraint of Maximal Myocardial Blood Flow in Humans
Circulation, September 14, 2004; 110(11): 1431 - 1436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
S. E. Possick and M. Barry
Evaluation and Management of the Cardiovascular Patient Embarking on Air Travel
Ann Intern Med, July 20, 2004; 141(2): 148 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
108/10/1202    most recent
01.CIR.0000087432.63671.2Ev1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wyss, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kaufmann, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wyss, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kaufmann, P. A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Coronary Artery Disease
Related Collections
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - CV surgery
Right arrow Nuclear cardiology and PET
Right arrow Chronic ischemic heart disease
Right arrow Coronary circulation
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide