(Circulation. 2003;108:43.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Cardiovascular Research Institute, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY.
Correspondence to Neil J. Weissman, MD, Cardiovascular Research Institute, 110 Irving St, NW, Suite 4B-1, Washington, DC 20010. E-mail Neil.J.Weissman{at}medstar.net
Received January 24, 2003; revision received March 26, 2003; accepted April 4, 2003.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results We analyzed 7484 consecutive patients without acute myocardial infarction who were treated with PCI and stenting and underwent IVUS imaging during the intervention. Twenty-seven (0.4%) had angiographically documented subacute closure <1 week after PCI (median time to subacute closure, 24 hours). Subacute closure lesions were compared with a control group (selected to be 3 times the abrupt closer group) matched by procedure date (within 6 months), age, gender, stable or unstable angina, lesion location, and additional treatment (balloon angioplasty or atherectomy). Postintervention IVUS did not identify a cause in 22% and did identify at least 1 cause for abrupt closure in 78% of patients (versus 33% in matched lesions, P=0.0002). In 48% of the patients, there were multiple causes in 48% (versus 3% in matched lesions, P<0.0001). Causes included dissection (17%), thrombus (4%), and tissue protrusion within the stent struts leading to lumen compromise lumen (4%). A total of 83% of patients with >1 of these abnormal morphologies also had reduced lumen dimensions post-PCI (final lumen <80% reference lumen). Preprocedural lesion characteristics were not different from matched lesions.
Conclusions Subacute stent thrombosis is infrequently related to the preintervention lesion characteristics. Inadequate postprocedure lumen dimensions, alone or in combination with other procedurally related abnormal lesion morphologies (dissection, thrombus, or tissue prolapse), contribute to this phenomenon.
Key Words: stents thrombosis ultrasonics
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
See p 2
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Baseline demographic and procedural variables and outcomes were recorded and entered prospectively in a prespecified database by a dedicated data coordinating center. All patients were serially interviewed by experienced research nurses at 30 days and 6 months after their procedure regarding the occurrence of cardiac events or the need for repeat coronary revascularization. All procedure complications and cardiac events were source documented and adjudicated.
We identified patients with subacute stent thrombosis. Subacute stent thrombosis was defined as recurrent ischemia and documented vessel occlusion at the site of stent implantation within 7 days after successful index PCI. Successful PCI was defined as a patent vessel at the treatment site with anterograde TIMI-3 flow and angiographic residual stenosis less than 50%.
We identified a comparison group (selected to be 3 times the size of the abrupt closer group) without subacute stent thrombosis. Patients were matched by procedure date (within 6 months), age, gender, stable or unstable angina, lesion location, and additional treatment (balloon angioplasty or atherectomy).
Angiographic Analysis
Angiographic analysis was retrospectively performed, blinded for the IVUS analysis results. Cine frames were selected from the 2 sharpest and most severe projections of the stenosis before and after the procedure. Quantitative coronary angiographic analysis was performed using the CMS-GFT system (Medis). The mean reference diameter (RD) was obtained from averaging 5-mm-long angiographically normal segments proximal and distal to the lesion. Minimal lumen diameter (MLD) was used to calculate percent diameter stenosis as follows: [(1-MLD/RDx100]. Filling defects, dissections classified by AHA type, and other abnormal findings were tabulated.
IVUS Imaging
A commercially available IVUS system (Boston Scientific Corporation/Scimed) was used. All IVUS studies were performed after the intracoronary administration of 200 µg of nitroglycerin. The IVUS catheter was advanced distal to the lesion, and imaging was performed retrograde back to the proximal reference at an automatic transducer pullback speed of 0.5 mm/s. When the first run was ambiguous, additional manual pull backs, typically with contrast or saline injection, were performed. IVUS studies were recorded onto a high-resolution, half-inch, s-VHS tape for later analysis.
Qualitative Analysis
IVUS characteristics were identified according to the criteria of the American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus document on IVUS and confirmed by comparing preinterventional versus postinterventional IVUS studies.12
Atheroma characteristics were classified as soft, fibrous, calcific, and mixed according to the plaque echogenicity. Thrombus was recognized as a pedunculated echolucent intraluminal mass or channels into the plaque. Dissections were classified in intimal, medial, adventitial, or intrastent (separation of neointimal hyperplasia from the stent struts). Ruptured plaque was defined as plaque ulceration with torn fibrous cap. Other unusual lesion morphologies were also noted. A calcified artery had at least 2 quadrants of calcium with calcium >90 degrees over half the lesion length.
Quantitative Analysis
Using planimetry software (TapeMeasure, INDEC Systems Inc), the following measurements were made: external elastic membrane (EEM) cross-sectional area (CSA, mm2), lumen CSA (mm2), plaque and media (P&M, EEM-lumen), and plaque burden (P&M/EEM). The lesion site selected for analysis was the image slice with the smallest lumen CSA. The proximal and distal reference segments selected for analysis were the most normal-looking cross sections within 10 mm proximal or distal to the lesion but before any side branch; the average of the proximal and distal reference EEM and lumen CSA were reported except for ostial lesions, where the distal reference EEM and lumen CSA were reported. Remodeling was defined as EEM lesion/EEM reference. Stent expansion was minimal stent CSA/reference lumen CSA. Stent malapposition was defined as lack of contact between any strut and the underlying vessel wall. Radial tent symmetry index was minimum/maximum stent diameter. Axial stent symmetry was minimum/maximum stent CSA.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of acute occlusion. Variables tested included stent expansion (stent/reference lumen CSA), residual dissection, radial stent symmetry index, lesion calcification, minimum stent diameter, and the presence of any 1 abnormal finding. Independent predictors of acute occlusion were stent expansion as a continuous variable (P=0.0405) and radial stent symmetry (P=0.0652). No dichotomous definition of stent underexpansion was an independent predictor of acute occlusion.
Statistics
Statistics were performed with StatView 5.0 (SAS Institute). Continuous variables were expressed as mean±1 SD and compared with students t test. Categorical data were expressed as frequencies and compared using
2 statistics.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Average heparin dose during the procedure was 129 mg (90 to 180 mg). Activated clotting time was monitored during PCI (every hour and at the end of the procedure). The shortest ACT monitored during PCI was 279 seconds (range, 159 to 301 seconds). Two patients received glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists. Stent length was 24.8±16.6 mm, and stent diameter was 3.0±0.4 mm. All patients received aspirin and clopidogrel (300 mg) or ticlopidine (500 mg) before PCI; clopidogrel or ticlopidine was continued for at least 4 weeks afterward. None of the patients prematurely stopped aspirin or antiplatelet therapy.
Angiographic Findings
Angiographic findings are presented in Table 1. Pre-PCI reference vessel diameter and MLD were 2.60±0.60 and 1.03±0.38 mm. Post-PCI, there was TIMI-3 flow in all patients. Final MLD was 2.24±0.70 mm and residual stenosis 18±17%. Two dissections (one type A and one type B) were observed by angiogram.
Clinical Outcomes
At 30 days, death occurred in 2 patients (8.7%) and Q-wave MI in 5 patients (22%). In 15 patients (65%), creatine kinase after acute closure rose above 5 times the normal value. At 6 months, the mortality rate in these patients was 17%.
IVUS Findings
IVUS findings are shown in Table 2. Subacute thrombosis lesions are compared with matched lesions that did not develop subacute closure (n=69). The most notable preintervention finding is that subacute vessel closure lesions were rarely calcified. The most notable postintervention finding is that lesions typically had residual stent dimensions that were smaller than the matched group.
|
Dissections were observed in 4 patients (17%), 3 distal to the lesion and 1 both proximal and distal to the lesion; all (4 of 4) had a mobile flap. Arc of dissection ranged from 64 to 177 degrees, and the length ranged from 3.5 to 6.0 mm. The residual lumen CSA was 5.7±2.5 mm2, which represented 57±32% of the reference lumen (<60% of the reference lumen in 3 of 4).
Post-PCI IVUS detected thrombus in 1 case and was intrastent. The lesion had no pre-PCI thrombus. When quantitative measurements (residual lumen dimensions compared with the reference) and qualitative findings (malapposition, dissection, thrombus, tissue protrusion, etc) were combined, no abnormalities were found in 22% and at least 1 abnormality was seen in 78% of stented lesions that developed subacute vessel closure (versus 33% of matched lesions, P=0.0002). More than 1 abnormality was seen in 48% of stented lesions (versus 3%, P<0.0001).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subacute vessel occlusion after PCI has been described after balloon angioplasty and coronary stenting.1,2 It is the most common early complication of PCI and is associated with high mortality.3,4 Diabetes, low ventricular function, age, and stent length and diameter have been associated with subacute vessel occlusion.5,6 Because IVUS provides unique images of stented coronary arteries,10,11 we hypothesized that it might identify additional important preprocedural or postprocedure characteristics associated with the occurrence of subacute stent thrombosis.
We report the results of a systematic IVUS analysis performed in a large, unselected population of patients undergoing de novo stenting at a single institution that routinely uses IVUS during interventional procedures. Among these patients, 0.36% experienced subacute stent thrombosis. Despite the fact that subacute closures were observed in angiographically small vessels (preintervention reference=2.60 mm), vessel size and remodeling as assessed by IVUS did not seem to predict subacute closure. Subacute closure occurred predominantly in echolucent and poorly calcified plaques, ie, those with high lipid and cellular content. However, with the exception of reduced calcium, these IVUS features are fairly common. Vulnerable atherosclerotic lesions are echolucent, eccentric, with a high plaque burden and evidence of a thin fibrous cap; these features were not seen in the present study. Furthermore, only 9% of lesions had IVUS findings that were suggestive of thrombus. The analysis of the preintervention lesion characteristics suggests that the plaque composition predisposes to, but does not determine the occurrence of, subacute closure.
In the present study, 78% of subacute stent thrombosis occurred in arteries with stent under deployment (malapposition or underexpansion as assessed by the MUSIC criteria13). The average minimal stent area was 6.4 mm2, representing 69% of the reference lumen area. These results confirm the importance of large lumen dimensions to reduce not only restenosis but also acute and subacute stent thrombosis. Initial observations with Palmaz-Schatz stents indicated that suboptimal results and small angiographic postprocedure lumen were associated with abrupt closure.5,14 Since then, the evolution to routine high pressure stent implantation has reduced the frequency of stent underexpansion. The POST registry, a study in which many different institutions submitted IVUS tapes of stents that subsequently thrombosed, also noted that subacute closure occurred in underexpanded stents.15 However, the POST registry was performed during the evolution of stent implantation techniques and antiplatelet therapy.16 Our study shows that stent underexpansion is still the most frequent finding in subacute stent thrombosis. In the CRUISE and OPTICUS studies, stent areas were increased with IVUS guidance, but that did not translate into a reduction of subacute closure.17,18 This suggests that the coronary flow impaired by an inadequate lumen is important but alone is not sufficient to cause subacute closure.19 It is important to note that IVUS vessel size and reference segment disease were not important predictors. Thus, final lesion site parametersones that can be controlled by the interventionalistare the most critical.
Dissection, thrombus, and tissue prolapse are also important morphologies to recognize. The likelihood of acute closure seems to increase when intraluminal material is mobile, distal to the PCI site, and causes a reduction in the final lumen dimension. High-grade dissections (with filling defects or occlusive dissections) are at high risk for postprocedure complications.25 However, the management of low-grade, nonocclusive dissections remains unclear. Interestingly, 83% of patients with one of these abnormal morphological findings (dissection, thrombus, and tissue prolapse) also had reduced final lumen dimensions (final lumen <80% reference lumen area). Thus, the two may be additive in newly stented lesions.
Initially, subacute vessel closure was thought to be the combination stent thrombogenicity and inadequate antithrombotic/antiplatelet treatment.20,21 Since then, these pharmacologic regimens have been optimized,22,23 and the present incidence of subacute stent thrombosis is less than 2%.24 Thus, the main culprit seems to be inadequacy of the final results.
Limitations
This study was retrospective. It was also an analysis of PCI performed with IVUS imaging. In general, IVUS information was used interactively during the procedure and might have influenced the results. Only 5% of patients received glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and present periprocedural antithrombotic and antiplatelet strategies may alter the findings.
Clinical Implications
This study shows that subacute vessel closure occurs mainly in noncalcified atherosclerotic plaques. Other pre-PCI lesion morphologies were not more common in subacute closure lesions versus matched controls. Conversely, subacute stent thrombosis is mainly related to the adequacy of the postprocedure lumen dimensions, especially in association with other abnormal postprocedure morphologies, such as dissections, thrombus, and tissue prolapse. Overall, only 22% of patients that experience subacute stent thrombosis have an optimum PCI result as assessed by IVUS.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Erbel R, Haude M, Hopp HW, et al. Coronary artery stenting compared with balloon angioplasty for restenosis after initial balloon angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339: 16721678.
3. Haude M, Erbel R, Issa H, et al. Subacute thrombotic complications after intracoronary implantation of Palmaz-Schatz stents. Am Heart J. 1993; 126: 1522.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Malenka DJ, ORourke D, Miller MA, et al. Cause of in-hospital death in 13,232 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J. 1999; 137: 632638.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Moussa I, Mario CD, Reimers B, et al. Subacute stent thrombosis in the era of intravascular ultrasound-guided coronary stenting without anticoagulation: frequency, predictors, and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 29: 612.[Abstract]
6. Cutlip DE, Baim DS, Kalon KL, et al. Stent thrombosis in the modern era: a pooled analysis of multicenter coronary stent clinical trials. Circulation. 2001; 103: 19671971.
7. Tenaglia AN, Fortin DF, Califf RM, et al. Predicting the risk of abrupt vessel closure after angioplasty in an individual patient. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 24: 10041011.[Abstract]
8. Serruys PW, van Hout B, Bonnier H, et al. Randomised comparison of implantation of heparin-coated stents with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with coronary artery disease (Benestent II). Lancet. 1998; 352: 673681.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. EPISTENT Investigators. Randomized placebo-controlled and balloon angioplasty-controlled trial to assess safety of coronary stenting with use of platelet glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa blockade. Lancet. 1998; 352: 8792.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Metz JA, Yock PG, Fitzgerald PJ. Intravascular ultrasound: basic interpretation. Cardiol Clin. 1997; 15: 115.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Nishimura RA, Edwards WD, Warnes CA, et al. Intravascular ultrasound imaging: in vitro validation and pathologic evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990; 16: 145154.[Abstract]
12. Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, et al. Am College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS): a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 14781492.
13. de Jaegere P, Mudra H, Figulla H, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided optimized stent deployment: immediate and 6 months clinical and angiographic results from the multicenter ultrasound stenting in coronaries study (MUSIC study). Eur Heart J. 1998; 19: 12141223.
14. Nakamura S, Colombo A, Gaglione A, et al. Intracoronary ultrasound observations during stent implantation. Circulation. 1994; 89: 20262034.
15. Uren NG, Schwarzacher SP, Metz JA, et al. Predictors and outcomes of stent thrombosis: an intravascular ultrasound registry. Eur Heart J. 2002; 23: 124132.
16. Colombo A, Hall P, Nakamura S, et al. Intracoronary stenting without anticoagulation accomplished with intravascular ultrasound guidance. Circulation. 1995; 91: 16761688.
17. Fitzgerald PJ, Oshima A, Hayase M, et al. Final results of the Can Routine Ultrasound Influence Stent Expansion (CRUISE) study. Circulation. 2000; 102: 523530.
18. Mudra H, di Mario C, de Jaegere P, et al. Randomized comparison of coronary stent implantation under ultrasound or angiographic guidance to reduce stent restenosis (OPTICUS Study). Circulation. 2001; 104: 13431349.
19. Pijls NJ, Klauss V, Siebert U, et al. Coronary pressure measurement after stenting predicts adverse events at follow-up: a multicenter registry. Circulation. 2002; 105: 29502954.
20. Sigwart U, Puel J, Mirkovitch V, et al. Intravascular stents to prevent occlusion and restenosis after transluminal angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1987; 316: 701706.[Abstract]
21. Serruys PW, Strauss BH, Beatt KJ, et al. Angiographic follow-up after placement of a self-expanding coronary-artery stent. N Engl J Med. 1991; 324: 1317.[Abstract]
22. Schomig A, Neumann FJ, Kastrati A, et al. A randomized comparison of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy after the placement of coronary-artery stents. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334: 10841089.
23. Leon MB, Baim DS, Popma JJ, et al. A clinical trial comparing three anti-thrombotic drug regimens after coronary artery stenting. N Engl J Med. 1998; 338: 16651671.
24. Moussa I, Oetgen M, Roubin G, et al. Effectiveness of clopidogrel and aspirin versus ticlopidine and aspirin in preventing stent thrombosis after coronary stent implantation. Circulation. 1999; 99: 23642366.
25. Cappelletti A, Margonato A, Rosano G, et al. Short- and long-term evolution of unstented nonocclusive coronary dissection after coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 34: 14841488.
Related Article:
Circulation 2003 108: 2-5.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Kukreja, Y. Onuma, H. M. Garcia-Garcia, J. Daemen, R. van Domburg, P. W. Serruys, and on behalf of the Interventional cardiologists of t The Risk of Stent Thrombosis in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Treated With Bare-Metal and Drug-Eluting Stents J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., June 1, 2009; 2(6): 534 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Liu, H. Doi, A. Maehara, G. S. Mintz, J. de Ribamar Costa Jr, K. Sano, G. Weisz, G. D. Dangas, A. J. Lansky, E. M. Kreps, et al. A Volumetric Intravascular Ultrasound Comparison of Early Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis Versus Restenosis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., May 1, 2009; 2(5): 428 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. van Werkum, A. A. Heestermans, A. C. Zomer, J. C. Kelder, M.-J. Suttorp, B. J. Rensing, J. J. Koolen, B.R. G. Brueren, J.-H. E. Dambrink, R. W. Hautvast, et al. Predictors of Coronary Stent Thrombosis: The Dutch Stent Thrombosis Registry J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 21, 2009; 53(16): 1399 - 1409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. H. Riedel, M. Tietke, K. Alfke, R. Stingele, and O. Jansen Subacute Stent Thrombosis in Intracranial Stenting Stroke, April 1, 2009; 40(4): 1310 - 1314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Aoki, A. J. Lansky, R. Mehran, J. Moses, M. E. Bertrand, B. T. McLaurin, D. A. Cox, A. M. Lincoff, E. M. Ohman, H. D. White, et al. Early Stent Thrombosis in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Treated With Drug-Eluting and Bare Metal Stents: The Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy Trial Circulation, February 10, 2009; 119(5): 687 - 698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kubo, T. Imanishi, H. Kitabata, A. Kuroi, S. Ueno, T. Yamano, T. Tanimoto, Y. Matsuo, T. Masho, S. Takarada, et al. Comparison of vascular response after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation between patients with unstable and stable angina pectoris a serial optical coherence tomography study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., July 1, 2008; 1(4): 475 - 484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. J. Hong, M. H. Jeong, Y. Ahn, D. S. Sim, J. W. Chung, J. S. Cho, N. S. Yoon, H. J. Yoon, J. Y. Moon, K. H. Kim, et al. Plaque prolapse after stent implantation in patients with acute myocardial infarction an intravascular ultrasound analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., July 1, 2008; 1(4): 489 - 497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Chechi, S. Vecchio, G. Vittori, G. Giuliani, A. Lilli, G. Spaziani, L. Consoli, G. Baldereschi, G. G.L. Biondi-Zoccai, I. Sheiban, et al. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction due to early and late stent thrombosis a new group of high-risk patients. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 24, 2008; 51(25): 2396 - 2402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Roy, D. H. Steinberg, S. J. Sushinsky, T. Okabe, T. L. P. Slottow, K. Kaneshige, Z. Xue, L. F. Satler, K. M. Kent, W. O. Suddath, et al. The potential clinical utility of intravascular ultrasound guidance in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents Eur. Heart J., June 11, 2008; (2008) ehn249v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Romagnoli, G. M. Sangiorgi, J. Cosgrave, E. Guillet, and A. Colombo Drug-eluting stenting the case for post-dilation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., February 1, 2008; 1(1): 22 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Sianos, M. I. Papafaklis, J. Daemen, S. Vaina, C. A. van Mieghem, R. T. van Domburg, L. K. Michalis, and P. W. Serruys Angiographic Stent Thrombosis After Routine Use of Drug-Eluting Stents in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The Importance of Thrombus Burden J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 14, 2007; 50(7): 573 - 583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Holmes Jr, D. J. Kereiakes, W. K. Laskey, A. Colombo, S. G. Ellis, T. D. Henry, J. J. Popma, P. W.J.C. Serruys, T. Kimura, D. O. Williams, et al. Thrombosis and Drug-Eluting Stents: An Objective Appraisal J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 10, 2007; 50(2): 109 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Brilakis, S. Banerjee, and P. B. Berger Perioperative Management of Patients With Coronary Stents J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 5, 2007; 49(22): 2145 - 2150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Mintz What to Do About Late Incomplete Stent Apposition? Circulation, May 8, 2007; 115(18): 2379 - 2381. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Cook, P. Wenaweser, M. Togni, M. Billinger, C. Morger, C. Seiler, R. Vogel, O. Hess, B. Meier, and S. Windecker Incomplete Stent Apposition and Very Late Stent Thrombosis After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation Circulation, May 8, 2007; 115(18): 2426 - 2434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. F. Luscher, J. Steffel, F. R. Eberli, M. Joner, G. Nakazawa, F. C. Tanner, and R. Virmani Drug-Eluting Stent and Coronary Thrombosis: Biological Mechanisms and Clinical Implications Circulation, February 27, 2007; 115(8): 1051 - 1058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Futamatsu, M. Sabate, D. J. Angiolillo, P. Jimenez-Quevedo, C. Corros, K. Morikawa-Futamatsu, F. Alfonso, J. Jiang, P. Cervinka, R. Hernandez-Antolin, et al. Characterization of Plaque Prolapse After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Diabetic Patients: A Three-Dimensional Volumetric Intravascular Ultrasound Outcome Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 19, 2006; 48(6): 1139 - 1145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Joner, A. V. Finn, A. Farb, E. K. Mont, F. D. Kolodgie, E. Ladich, R. Kutys, K. Skorija, H. K. Gold, and R. Virmani Pathology of Drug-Eluting Stents in Humans: Delayed Healing and Late Thrombotic Risk J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 4, 2006; 48(1): 193 - 202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-W. Lee, S.-W. Park, M.-K. Hong, Y.-H. Kim, B.-K. Lee, J.-M. Song, K. H. Han, C. W. Lee, D.-H. Kang, J.-K. Song, et al. Triple Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Stenting: Impact on Stent Thrombosis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 2005; 46(10): 1833 - 1837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Iakovou, T. Schmidt, E. Bonizzoni, L. Ge, G. M. Sangiorgi, G. Stankovic, F. Airoldi, A. Chieffo, M. Montorfano, M. Carlino, et al. Incidence, Predictors, and Outcome of Thrombosis After Successful Implantation of Drug-Eluting Stents JAMA, May 4, 2005; 293(17): 2126 - 2130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Fujii, S. G. Carlier, G. S. Mintz, Y.-m. Yang, I. Moussa, G. Weisz, G. Dangas, R. Mehran, A. J. Lansky, E. M. Kreps, et al. Stent underexpansion and residual reference segment stenosis are related to stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: An intravascular ultrasound study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 5, 2005; 45(7): 995 - 998. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Bavry, D. J. Kumbhani, T. J. Helton, and D. L. Bhatt What is the risk of stent thrombosis associated with the use of paclitaxel-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary intervention?: A meta-analysis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 15, 2005; 45(6): 941 - 946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. T.L. Ong, A. Hoye, J. Aoki, C. A.G. van Mieghem, G. A. Rodriguez Granillo, K. Sonnenschein, E. Regar, E. P. McFadden, G. Sianos, W. J. van der Giessen, et al. Thirty-day incidence and six-month clinical outcome of thrombotic stent occlusion after bare-metal, sirolimus, or paclitaxel stent implantation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 15, 2005; 45(6): 947 - 953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Honda and P. J. Fitzgerald Stent Thrombosis: An Issue Revisited in a Changing World Circulation, July 8, 2003; 108(1): 2 - 5. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |