(Circulation. 2003;107:3118.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Editorials |
From the Division of Molecular Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine IV, University of Frankfurt, Germany.
Correspondence to Stefanie Dimmeler, PhD, Molecular Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine IV, University of Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany. E-mail dimmeler{at}em.uni-frankfurt.de
Key Words: Editorials nitric oxide synthase exercise endothelium signal transduction
Epidemiological studies have clearly documented that regular physical exercise promotes cardiovascular health and reduces the risk in patients with established coronary heart disease.1,2 The mechanisms mediating the atheroprotective effects of exercise are not clearly defined. Multiple possible mediators have been suggested, including various physiological adaptations, altered autonomic function, and metabolic adjustments. Regular physical activity is associated with favorable modification of cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and hypercholesterolemia.3 However, the beneficial effects of regular physical activity cannot be accounted for solely by reduction of risk factors, because the association with reduced mortality is independent of other coronary risk factors.3 In recent years, it has become apparent that exercise directly affects the functional activity of the vascular endothelium.4 By increasing the mechanical shear forces on the luminal surface of the endothelial monolayer, exercise-induced increases in blood flow enhance the vasodilatory capacity of the arteries in animal models and in patients.4,5 The endothelium not only plays a pivotal role in controlling vascular tone but exerts several important antiatherosclerotic functions, such as preventing platelets and inflammatory cells from adhering to the vascular surface. Indeed, the functional integrity of the endothelium to respond to increased blood flow is the major independent predictor of atherosclerotic disease progression and clinical outcome in patients at risk for coronary artery disease.6 Thus, the improvement of endothelial function by exercise is most likely to be of major importance for the atheroprotective effects of regular physical activity.
See p 3152
In the present issue of Circulation, Hambrecht et al7 now provide some mechanistic insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the enhanced endothelial vasodilator function in response to exercise in patients with coronary artery disease, namely the increased production of NO. Previous experimental studies demonstrated that endothelial NO bioavailability is regulated by at least 3 different mechanisms, as follows: (1) transcriptional upregulation of the endothelial NO synthase (eNOS),8 (2) posttranscriptional activation of the eNOS,9,10 and (3) reduction of reactive oxygen speciesmediated breakdown of NO by increasing the antioxidative defense mechanisms.11,12 Using tissue specimens of the left internal mammary artery harvested during coronary bypass surgery, Hambrecht et al7 demonstrate that transcriptional and posttranscriptional mechanisms indeed contribute to exercise-induced improvement of endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease. In detail, the authors link the effect of regular exercise training to an increase in eNOS protein expression and activation of eNOS enzyme activity via Akt-dependent phosphorylation, thereby providing direct evidence for the clinical relevance of the previous cell culture and animal experiments.5
Phosphorylation of the amino acid Ser1177 (bovine Ser1179) within the eNOS by the serine/threonine kinase Akt (protein kinase B) has been shown to be critical for activation of the eNOS in various in vitro studies.9,10 Shear stressinduced stimulation of Akt is responsible for the prolonged, calcium-independent activation of the eNOS and, thus, acts in addition to the short-term calcium-mediated stimulation of eNOS. Meanwhile, additional kinases have been postulated to phosphorylate eNOS at Ser1177, including AMP-activated protein kinase13 and protein kinase A.14 Whereas AMP-activated protein kinase does not appear to be involved in shear stressmediated eNOS phosphorylation and activation, the data regarding the contribution of Akt and protein kinase A for shear stressinduced phosphorylation of eNOS at Ser1177 are conflicting.9,14,15 However, all studies agree that inhibition of Akt blocks shear stressinduced NO synthesis and that Akt activates the enzymatic activity of eNOS.9,14,15 To make it even more complex, eNOS recently has been shown to be phosphorylated at various other residues, thereby either promoting (Ser617 and Ser635) or inhibiting (Ser116 and Thr495) eNOS enzyme activity.16,17 Particularly, shear stress has been reported to phosphorylate Ser635 of the bovine eNOS (equivalent to human Ser633) with a slower kinetic than that of Ser1177.18 Additionally, eNOS is regulated by protein-protein interaction, acetylation, and translocation.19 Thus, the somehow conflicting data probably reflect a complex and not yet fully defined array of pathways regulating eNOS activity. Although the limitation of the clinical setting does not allow for studying the causal contribution of the different kinases for eNOS phosphorylation and activation, the highly significant correlation of Akt phosphorylation and eNOS Ser1177 phosphorylation observed by Hambrecht et al7 supports an important and dominant role for Akt in exercise-induced activation of eNOS in humans.
Endothelium-derived NO exerts a plethora of antiatherosclerotic functions. Acting in an autocrine manner on the endothelial cell itself, NO inhibits endothelial cell apoptosis, suppresses inflammatory activation, and increases the activity of oxygen radicalscavenging enzymes.12,20 The paracrine effects of NO include inhibition of platelet aggregation via luminal release from the endothelium as well as inhibition of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and promotion of positive arterial remodeling via abluminal release.21 Thus, linking exercise to Akt-mediated activation of eNOS does indeed provide important and significant insights into the mechanisms involved in the atheroprotective effects of exercise in patients with coronary artery disease.
However, in addition to mediating eNOS activation, Akt performs several NO-independent functions, which are very likely to contribute to restoring normal endothelial function and, thereby, limiting the clinical manifestation of atherosclerotic disease (Figure). Akt-mediated signaling plays a pivotal role for endothelial cell survival, migration, and proliferation, all of which are intimately involved in angiogenesis and vascular repair.22 In addition, Akt-dependent mechanisms promote mobilization and functional activity of bone marrowderived endothelial progenitor cells, which contribute crucially to neovascularization of ischemic tissue.23,24 Thus, the close correlation between Akt phosphorylation (and thus activation) and physical activity reported by Hambrecht et al7 may not only translate into improved endothelial NOmediated vasodilator function of arterial conductance vessels prone to atherosclerotic lesion development, but may also enhance neovascularization of ischemic tissue and vascular repair processes. Indeed, regular physical activity is well established to enhance blood flow to critically ischemic tissue in both the coronary and the peripheral circulation.3
|
If exercise does translate into improved endothelial function via Akt-dependent mechanisms, other interventions that activate Akt might also be expected to have demonstrable effects on endothelial function. Available evidence clearly supports this hypothesis. Lipid-lowering therapy with statins not only activates the Akt-eNOS pathway25 but also rapidly improves endothelial NO production and, most importantly, decreases cardiovascular events in patients at risk for coronary artery disease. Thus, it is reasonable to speculate that activation of the Akt-eNOS signaling pathway by exerciseas reported by Hambrecht et al7will eventually translate into inhibition of atherosclerotic disease progression. Interestingly, however, the effects of exercise on Akt-mediated eNOS activation observed by Hambrecht et al7 appear to be superimposed on the effects of statin therapy, given that 88% of the patients studied were chronically receiving statins.
The study by Hambrecht et al,7 however, does not answer the question how much exercise is needed to activate the Akt-eNOS signaling pathway in human arteries. Moreover, the exercise regimen applied is rather unconventional, with 6 sessions of short-term physical activity 10 minutes each day for 4 weeks. Thus, the findings reported by the authors might be specific for frequent but short-term bouts of increases in blood flow rather than reflecting the effects of regular physical activity, which is recommended in most cardiac rehabilitation programs, with 5 to 6 exercise sessions of 20 to 30 minutes each per week. In addition, the number of patients studied was relatively small, and only male patients were included. Notwithstanding these limitations, the findings of Hambrecht et al7 not only disclose a molecular signaling pathway illuminating the therapeutic effects of regular physical activity but also represent an excellent demonstration of translational research from bench to bedside to decipher insights gathered from epidemiological evidence.
Acknowledgments
We are supported by a grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 533). We apologize for the failure to cite many important publications because of space limitations.
Footnotes
The opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.
References
Related Article:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Hamerman Osteoporosis and atherosclerosis: biological linkages and the emergence of dual-purpose therapies QJM, July 1, 2005; 98(7): 467 - 484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K Woolf-May, S Bird, and P D MacIntyre Physical activity levels during phase IV cardiac rehabilitation in a group of male myocardial infarction patients * Commentary Br. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2005; 39(3): e12 - e12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Leon, B. A. Franklin, F. Costa, G. J. Balady, K. A. Berra, K. J. Stewart, P. D. Thompson, M. A. Williams, and M. S. Lauer Cardiac Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease: An American Heart Association Scientific Statement From the Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention) and the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity), in Collaboration With the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Circulation, January 25, 2005; 111(3): 369 - 376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Green, W. Bilsborough, L. H. Naylor, C. Reed, J. Wright, G. O'Driscoll, and J. H. Walsh Comparison of forearm blood flow responses to incremental handgrip and cycle ergometer exercise: relative contribution of nitric oxide J. Physiol., January 15, 2005; 562(2): 617 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J Green, A. Maiorana, G. O'Driscoll, and R. Taylor Effect of exercise training on endothelium-derived nitric oxide function in humans J. Physiol., November 15, 2004; 561(1): 1 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Conti, C. Carrozza, E. Capoluongo, M. Volpe, F. Crea, C. Zuppi, and F. Andreotti Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 as a Vascular Protective Factor Circulation, October 12, 2004; 110(15): 2260 - 2265. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Green, J. H. Walsh, A. Maiorana, M. J. Best, R. R. Taylor, and J. G. O'Driscoll Exercise-induced improvement in endothelial dysfunction is not mediated by changes in CV risk factors: pooled analysis of diverse patient populations Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2003; 285(6): H2679 - H2687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |