Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2003;107:3073-3080
Published online before print June 16, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000070937.52035.25
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
107/24/3073    most recent
01.CIR.0000070937.52035.25v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kubota, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yamaguchi, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kubota, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yamaguchi, T.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal models of human disease

(Circulation. 2003;107:3073.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Basic Science Reports

Lack of Insulin Receptor Substrate-2 Causes Progressive Neointima Formation in Response to Vessel Injury

Tetsuya Kubota, MD; Naoto Kubota, MD, PhD; Masao Moroi, MD, PhD; Yasuo Terauchi, MD, PhD; Tsuneo Kobayashi, PhD; Katsuo Kamata, PhD; Ryo Suzuki, MD, PhD; Kazuyuki Tobe, MD, PhD; Atsushi Namiki, MD, PhD; Shinichi Aizawa, PhD; Ryozo Nagai, MD, PhD; Takashi Kadowaki, MD, PhD; Tetsu Yamaguchi, MD, PhD

From the Third Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University School of Medicine, Ohashi Hospital, Tokyo, Japan (T.K., M.M., A.N., T.Y.); the Department of Metabolic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (N.K., Y.T., R.S., K.T., T.K.); the Department of Physiology and Morphology, Institute of Medicinal Chemistry, Hoshi University, Tokyo, Japan (T.K., K.K.); the Laboratory for Animal Resources and Genetic Engineering Center for Developmental Biology, RIKEN Kobe, Hyogo, Japan (S.A.); and the Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (R.N.).

Correspondence to Dr Masao Moroi, Third Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University School of Medicine, Ohashi Hospital 2-17-6 Ohashi, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8515, Japan. E-mail moroi{at}med.toho-u.ac.jp


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Insulin resistance is associated with atherosclerosis, but its mechanism is unknown. It has been reported that insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-1 deficient (IRS-1-/-) mice showed insulin resistance without type 2 diabetes, whereas the IRS-2 deficient (IRS-2-/-) mice showed insulin resistance with type 2 diabetes.

Methods and Results— We investigated neointima formation in the IRS-1-/- and IRS-2-/- mice at 8 and 20 weeks. The IRS-2-/- mice showed much greater neointima formation than the IRS-1-/- and wild-type mice at 8 weeks. At 20 weeks, the IRS-2-/- mice had greater neointima formation than the IRS-1-/- mice, which showed more enhanced neointima formation than the wild-type mice. The IRS-1-/- and IRS-2-/- mice had dyslipidemia, hypertension, and insulin resistance. The IRS-2-/- mice had more metabolic abnormalities than the IRS-1-/- mice at 8 and 20 weeks. IRS-2 expression was detected, but IRS-1 expression was not detected in the vessels.

Conclusions— The neointima formation in the IRS-1-/- and IRS-2-/- mice appears to be related to abnormalities induced by the altered metabolic milieu in insulin-resistant states. Moreover, because neointima formation was much greater in the IRS-2-/- mice than in the IRS-1-/- mice at 8 and 20 weeks, it is suggested that a lack of IRS-2 renders the vasculature more susceptible to injury in the abnormal metabolic milieu, and IRS-2 may have a protective effect on neointima formation. We conclude that IRS-2 is protective and retards the development of neointima formation in insulin-resistant states.


Key Words: atherosclerosis • insulin • vessels • risk factors


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis involves complex interactions among multiple risk factors. Because insulin resistance is usually seen in patients with multiple risk factors for atherosclerosis, such as hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, type 2 diabetes, and hypertension, it is difficult to evaluate whether insulin resistance directly induces atherosclerosis, even though it has been recognized as an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis.1,2

Transgenic and knockout mouse technology may provide useful models with which to dissect the contribution of insulin resistance to the pathogenic mechanisms that lead to atherosclerosis.3–5 We previously generated two distinct murine models of insulin resistance: a representative murine model of insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome, that is, the insulin receptor substrate-1 deficient (IRS-1-/-) mouse,6 and a representative murine model of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes, that is, the insulin receptor substrate-2 deficient (IRS-2-/-) mouse.7 However, the IRS-2-/- mice display only insulin resistance without hyperglycemia until 8 to 10 weeks of age. We used a cuff-injured model that has a quantitative and reproducible end point.8 In this model, external vascular cuff placement induces vascular neointima formation without the direct intraluminal injury that occurs, for example, with the balloon model, and this allows assessment of the effect of endothelial factors.

IRS-1 has been identified as a major substrate of both the insulin receptor and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor tyrosine kinases.9 The IRS-1-/- mice have insulin resistance, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, and growth retardation6,10,11 but fail to show type 2 diabetes as the result of compensatory ß-cell hyperplasia and hyperinsulinemia. IRS-2 has been identified as an IRS-1–independent pathway for signal transduction of insulin,12–14 and the IRS-2-/- mice have insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes after 8 to 10 weeks of age as the result of a combination of insulin resistance and lack of compensatory ß-cell hyperplasia.7,15 Thus, IRS-1 and IRS-2 play overlapping and distinct roles in the regulation of glucose homeostasis.16

To determine the role of IRS-1 and IRS-2 in the development of atherosclerosis, we investigated whether IRS-1-/- and IRS-2-/- mice show abnormalities in neointima formation in response to vessel injury.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Animals
The IRS-1-/- and IRS-2-/- mice were maintained on the original C57BL6/CBA hybrid background.6,7 The IRS-1-/- and wild-type mice were prepared by means of the IRS-1+/- mouse intercrosses, and the IRS-2-/- and wild-type mice were prepared by the IRS-2+/- mouse intercrosses. All mice were maintained on a 12/12-hour light/dark cycle. All experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the US National Institutes of Health.17

Cuff Placement, Tissue Harvesting, and Morphometry
The experiment in this study was performed on 8- and 20- week-old male mice. Femoral artery cuff (polyethylene tube; inner diameter, 0.58 mm; length, 2 mm) placement was performed as previously described, with some modifications.8 Two weeks after cuff placement, femoral arteries were fixed in situ with 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin. Continuous cross sections (5 µm) were then cut from one edge to the other edge of the cuffed portion. Morphometric analyses were performed on tissue stained for elastic fibers and with hematoxylin and eosin, as previously described, with some modifications.8 The areas of lumen, intima, and media were measured in 10 cross sections, and the volume ratio of intima to media, intimal thickness, medial thickness, and luminal diameter were then calculated. The examiners of the sections were blinded to the genotype of the mice.

Antibody
Immunohistochemical staining was performed with an anti-{alpha} smooth muscle actin antibody (DAKO), anti–von Willebrand factor antibody (DAKO), anti–IRS-1 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc), and anti–IRS-2 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc).

Western Blot Analysis of the Aorta
For Western blot analysis, the aorta was rapidly excised and freed of surrounding fat and connective tissue. It was then homogenized, and samples were precipitated with anti–IRS-1 antibody (Upstate Biotechnology) or anti–IRS-2 antibody (Upstate Biotechnology) for 1 hour. Immunoprecipitated fractions were separated by 6% or 7.5% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes. Blots were first incubated with anti–IRS-1 antibody or anti–IRS-2 antibody for 1 hour at room temperature, and detection was performed by immunoblotting with the antibody.

Poly(A)+ RNA Preparation and RT-PCR
Poly (A)+ RNA extraction was performed by an mRNA kit (Invitrogen Co). RT-PCR was performed in accordance with standard practices, using poly (A)+ RNA from liver and artery. RT was performed for 50 minutes at 42°C with Super Script II (Invitrogen Co). RT-PCR was replicated a minimum of 5 times.

Blood Sample Assay
Fasting blood glucose was measured with an automatic glucometer (Glutest Ace, Sanwa Chemical Co). Plasma insulin (Shibayagi Co, Ltd), triglyceride, total cholesterol, free fatty acids, and HDL (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd) were assayed by enzymatic methods.

Measurement of Blood Pressure and Heart Rate
Systolic blood pressure and pulse rate were measured with an automatic sphygmomanometer by the tail-cuff method in unanesthetized animals.

Measurement of Isometric Force
The thoracic aorta of the IRS-1-/-, IRS-2-/-, and wild-type mice at 8 and 20 weeks was removed. It was placed in oxygenated and modified Krebs-Henseleit solution (KHS), as previously described.18 The tissue was placed in a well-displacement transducer (TB-612T; Nihon-Kohden). The relaxation response to acetlycholine (ACh, Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP, Sigma Chemical Co) was expressed as percentage decrease in the tension of contractile force induced by PGF2{alpha} (Ono Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd).

Statistical Analysis
Values are expressed as mean±SEM. Statistical analyses were performed by ANOVA, and post hoc analysis was performed by the Bonferroni/Dunn method. Probability values of ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Increased Neointima Formation Is Induced by Vessel Injury in the IRS-2-/- Mice
We placed a cuff around the femoral artery to induce inflammation of the adventitia and neointima formation. The IRS-1-/-, IRS-2-/-, and wild-type mice had no visible intima at baseline, and sham-operated vessels did not show evidence of intimal proliferation at 8 and 20 weeks (data not shown). At 8 weeks, the intimal thickness 2 weeks after cuff placement was greater in the IRS-2-/- mice than in the IRS-1-/- or wild-type mice. The intimal thickness in the IRS-1-/- mice was not significantly different from that in the wild-type mice, but there was a trend toward less intimal thickness in the IRS-1-/- mice (Figure 1A, a through f, and Figure 2A, b). There were no significant differences in medial thickness among the IRS-1-/-, IRS-2-/-, and wild-type mice at 8 weeks (Figure 2A, c). At 8 weeks, the intima (I)/media (M) volume ratio was much greater in the IRS-2-/- mice (60±8%) than in the IRS-1-/- (32±4%) or wild-type mice (40±5%). The I/M volume ratio in the IRS-1-/- mice was not significantly different from that in the wild-type mice, but there was a trend toward a lower I/M volume ratio in the IRS-1-/- mice (Figure 2A, d). There were also no significant differences in medial thickness among the IRS-1-/-, IRS-2-/-, and wild-type mice at 20 weeks (Figure 2B, c). At 20 weeks, the intimal thickness was significantly greater in the IRS-1-/- and IRS-2-/- mice than in the wild-type mice and was significantly greater in the IRS-2-/- mice than in the IRS-1-/- mice (Figure 1B, a through f, and Figure 2B, b). At 20 weeks, the I/M volume ratio was greater in the IRS-2-/- mice (95±17%) than in the IRS-1-/- mice (67±8%, P=0.08) and it was significantly greater in the IRS-1-/- mice than in the wild-type mice (41±7%, P=0.04) (Figure 2B, d). At 8 weeks, staining for von Willebrand factor as an endothelial cell marker was positive only in the endothelial cells in the cuff-injured vessels of the IRS-1-/-, IRS-2-/-, and wild-type mice (Figure 3, a through f). The majority of cells in the neointima of the cuff-injured vessels, as well as the cells in the media, were stained positive for {alpha}-smooth muscle actin at 8 weeks (Figure 3, g through l). These findings suggest that the cells in the neointima may have migrated from the smooth muscle cells in the media. At 8 weeks, intimal thickness assessed by {alpha}-smooth muscle actin staining increased in the IRS-2-/- mice as compared with the IRS-1-/- and wild-type mice, whereas medial thickness was similar in all three genotypes.



View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Representative cuff-injured vessels from wild-type (WT), IRS-1-/-, and IRS-2-/- mice. A, 8 weeks; B, 20 weeks; elastic fiber–stained, hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections from wild-type cuff-injured (a and d), IRS-1-/- cuff-injured (b and e), and IRS-2-/- cuff-injured (c and f) vessels. Neointima within the internal elastic lamina (arrows) is visible in cuff-injured vessels (a through f) at 8 and 20 weeks. At 8 weeks, IRS-2-/- mice showed substantially more neointima formation in response to vessel injury than wild-type and IRS-1-/- mice. At 8 weeks, neointima of IRS-1-/- mice is similar to that of wild-type mice. At 20 weeks, IRS-1-/- and IRS-2-/- mice showed substantially more neointima formation in response to vessel injury than wild-type. Images in d, e, and f were obtained under high power (x400); images in a, b and c under low power (x200). Bars, 20 µm.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Morphometric analysis of vessels from wild-type (WT), IRS-1-/-, and IRS-2-/- mice. A, 8 weeks; B, 20 weeks; a, luminal diameter before cuff placement. Luminal diameter did not differ significantly among wild-type, IRS-1-/-, and IRS-2-/- mice. b, Intimal thickness 2 weeks after cuff placement. At 8 and 20 weeks, intimal thickness had increased significantly in IRS-2-/- mice compared with wild-type and IRS-1-/- mice. c, Medial thickness 2 weeks after cuff placement. Medial thickness did not differ among wild-type, IRS-1-/-, and IRS-2-/- mice at 8 and 20 weeks. d, I/M 2 weeks after cuff placement. At 8 weeks, I/M ratio showed significantly increased neointima formation in IRS-2-/- mice (I/M, 60±8%) compared with wild-type mice (I/M, 40±5%) or IRS-1-/- mice (I/M, 32±4%). At 20 weeks, I/M ratio showed significantly increased neointima formation in IRS-1-/- (I/M, 66.5±8%) and IRS-2-/- mice (I/M, 94.5±17%) compared with wild-type mice (I/M, 40.7±7.4%). *P<0.05; **P<0.005. A, Wild-type, n=17; IRS-1-/-, n=11; IRS-2-/-, n=10; B, wild-type, n=8; IRS-1-/-, n=13; IRS-2-/-, n=9.



View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Immunohistochemical staining of injured vessels for von Willebrand factor (a through f) and {alpha}-smooth muscle actin (g through l) at 8 weeks. Endothelial cells (von Willebrand factor–positive cells) were present in cuff-injured vessels of wild-type (WT) (a and d), IRS-1-/- (b and e), and IRS-2-/- (c and f) mice. Neointima cells within the internal elastic lamina (arrows) were {alpha}-smooth muscle actin–positive in wild-type (g and j), IRS-1-/- (h and k), and IRS-2-/- (i and l) mice, but they did not stain for von Willebrand factor. Images in d, e, f, j, k, and l were obtained under high power (x400); images in a, b, c, g, h, and i under low power (x200). Bars, 20 µm.

IRS-2 Is More Abundantly Expressed in Mouse Vessel Tissue Than IRS-1
To investigate expression of IRS-1 and IRS-2 in vessel tissue, we performed immunohistochemical staining and Western blot analysis in the IRS-1-/-, IRS-2-/-, and wild-type mice. Staining of vessel tissue with anti–IRS-1 antibody was similar to staining with control serum in all three mouse genotypes (Figure 4, b through d), whereas the liver of the wild-type mice clearly stained with anti–IRS-1 antibody (Figure 4, a). Consistent with this, Western blot analysis with antibody for IRS-1 showed that IRS-1 was undetectable not only in the vessel tissue of the IRS-1-/- mice, as predicted, but in that of the IRS-2-/- and wild-type mice as well (Figure 4, q). RT-PCR with IRS-1 primers, however, showed that a small amount of IRS-1 mRNA was detectable in the vessel tissue of the IRS-2-/- and wild-type mice (data not shown). No staining of vessel tissue with anti–IRS-2 antibody was observed in the IRS-2-/- mice, but staining was clearly detected in the IRS-1-/- and wild-type mice (Figure 4, j through l). Western blot analysis with anti–IRS-2 antibody clearly detected IRS-2 in the vessel tissue of the IRS-1-/- and wild-type mice as well as in the liver of the wild-type mice but not in the vessel tissue of the IRS-2-/- mice (Figure 4, r). These findings indicate that IRS-2 is much more abundantly expressed in vessel tissue, including endothelial cells, than IRS-1. Jiang et al19 reported that both IRS-1 and IRS-2 were expressed in rat aorta. They made comparisons of IRS between lean and obese animals but did not compare expression of IRS-1 and IRS-2 in the same animals. Our results clearly show that IRS-2 is much more abundantly expressed in mouse aorta than IRS-1. We compared IRS-2 expression in vessel tissue at 8 weeks with those at 20 weeks by immunohistochemical staining, Western blot analysis, and RT-PCR. Immunohistochemical staining and RT-PCR showed that IRS-2 expression was similar in the IRS-1-/- and wild-type mice at 8 and 20 weeks (Figure 5, a and c), but Western blot analysis showed that IRS-2 expression tended to be lower at 20 weeks than at 8 weeks in the IRS-1-/- mice (Figure 5, b).



View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Expression of IRS-1 and IRS-2 in wild-type, IRS-1-/-, and IRS-2-/- mice at 8 weeks. a through h, Immunohistochemical staining for IRS-1 (a through d) and its negative controls (e through h). i through p, Immunohistochemical staining for IRS-2 (I through l) and its negative controls (m through p). q, Western blot analysis for IRS-1; r, Western blot analysis for IRS-2. IRS-2 predominates over IRS-1 in vessel tissues, whereas IRS-1 and IRS-2 were expressed in the liver. Images (a through p) are at the same magnification (x400). q and r, Wild-type, n=10; IRS-1-/-, n=15; IRS-2-/-, n=10.



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Expression of IRS-2 at 8 and 20 weeks in wild-type and IRS-1-/- mice. a, Immunohistochemical staining for IRS-2; b, Western blot analysis for IRS-2; c, RT-PCR with IRS-2 primers.

IRS-1-/- and IRS-2-/- Mice Exhibit Hyperinsulinemia, Increased Free Fatty Acid, and Triglyceride Levels, and Hypertension
Blood glucose levels after a 16-hour fast did not differ significantly among the IRS-1-/-, IRS-2-/-, and wild-type mice at 8 weeks (Figure 6A, a) but were significantly higher in the IRS-2-/- mice than in the IRS-1-/- or wild-type mice at 20 weeks, indicating that the IRS-2-/- mice developed type 2 diabetes as previously described (Figure 6B, a).7 Plasma insulin levels were significantly higher in the IRS-1-/- and IRS-2-/- than in the wild-type mice at 8 and 20 weeks, indicating that the IRS-1-/- and IRS-2-/- mice were insulin-resistant (Figure 6A, b, and Figure 6B, b). Plasma free fatty acid levels were higher in the IRS-1-/- and IRS-2-/- mice than in the wild-type mice. However, they did not differ significantly between the IRS-1-/- and IRS-2-/- mice at 8 weeks (Figure 6A, c) or among the IRS-1-/-, IRS-2-/-, and wild-type mice at 20 weeks (Figure 6B, c). Plasma triglyceride levels were significantly higher in the IRS-1-/- and IRS-2-/- mice than in the wild-type mice at 8 weeks (Figure 6A, d) and were significantly higher in the IRS-2-/- mice than in the wild-type mice at 20 weeks. In addition, they tended to be higher in the IRS-1-/- mice than in the wild-type mice at 20 weeks (Figure 6B, d). Plasma total cholesterol levels were higher in the IRS-2-/- mice than in the IRS-1-/- or wild-type mice at 8 and 20 weeks (Figure 6A, e, and Figure 6B, e), primarily as the result of increased plasma HDL levels (Figure 6A, f, and Figure 6B, f). Systolic blood pressure was significantly higher in the IRS-1-/- and IRS-2-/- mice than in the wild-type mice at 8 and 20 weeks (Figure 6A, g, and Figure 6B, g). Pulse rates did not differ significantly among the IRS-1-/-, IRS-2-/-, and wild-type mice at 8 and 20 weeks (Figure 6A, h, and Figure 6B, h).



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Comparison of risk factors for atherosclerosis. A, 8 weeks; B, 20 weeks; a, fasting blood glucose levels; b, fasting plasma insulin levels; c, fasting plasma free fatty acid levels; d, fasting plasma triglyceride levels; e, fasting plasma total cholesterol levels; f, fasting plasma HDL levels; g, systolic blood pressure; h, pulse rate. *P<0.05; **P<0.005; ***P<0.0001.

Endothelium-Dependent Vascular Relaxation Is Impaired in 20-Week-Old IRS-1-/- and IRS-2-/- Mice
When PGF2{alpha}-induced (10-6 to 3x10-6 mol/L) contraction of aortic strips from the three mouse genotypes reached a plateau, ACh (10-9 to 10-5 mol/L) was added cumulatively and caused concentration-dependent relaxation of the aortic strips. The ACh-induced relaxation did not differ significantly among the IRS-1-/-, IRS-2-/-, and wild-type mice at 8 weeks (Figure 7, a), but at 20 weeks, the endothelium-dependent relaxation induced by ACh (10-8 to 10-5 mol/L) was significantly impaired in the IRS-2-/- mice compared with the IRS-1-/- or wild-type mice. The endothelium-dependent relaxation by ACh (10 -7.5 to 10-7 mol/L) was also significantly impaired in the IRS-1-/- mice compared with the wild-type mice (Figure 7, c). By contrast, endothelium-independent relaxation induced by SNP (10-10 to 10-5 mol/L) did not differ significantly among the IRS-1-/-, IRS-2-/-, and wild-type mice at 8 and 20 weeks (Figure 7, b and d).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Vascular reactivity in the aortic strip. Relaxation response to ACh (left) and SNP (right) is expressed as a percentage of decreased tension of contractile force induced by 10-6 to 3x10-6 mol/L PGF2{alpha}. Relaxation by ACh did not differ significantly among IRS-1-/-, IRS-2-/-, and wild-type mice at 8 weeks (a) but at 20 weeks was impaired at concentrations of 10-8 to 10-5 mol/L in IRS-2-/- mice compared with the IRS-1-/- and wild-type mice. At 20 weeks, relaxation by ACh (10-7.5 to 10-7 mol/L) was significantly impaired in IRS-1-/- mice compared with wild-type mice (c). Endothelium-independent vascular relaxation did not differ among IRS-1-/-, IRS-2-/-, and wild-type mice at 8 and 20 weeks (b and d). *P<0.05; **P<0.005; ***P<0.001, IRS-1-/- and IRS-2-/- vs wild-type mice; {ddagger}P<0.05; {ddagger}{ddagger}P<0.005; {ddagger}{ddagger}{ddagger}P<0.001, IRS-1-/-vs IRS-2-/- mice. ACh: 8 weeks; wild-type, n=8; IRS-1-/-, n=11; IRS-2-/-, n=11; 20 weeks; wild-type, n=12; IRS-1-/-, n=11; IRS-2-/-, n=11; SNP: 8 weeks; wild-type, n=8; IRS-1-/-, n=11; IRS-2-/-, n=11; 20 weeks; wild-type, n=12; IRS-1-/-, n=11; IRS-2-/-, n=11.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In this study, we carried out cuff placement as an atherosclerotic model. This enabled us to quantify neointima formation reproducibly and differs from other atherosclerotic models, such as a filament model or a balloon injury model,20 in several important ways. The latter two models involve removal of the endothelial layer, whereas in the cuff model, endothelial cells are not directly manipulated or removed, thereby allowing study of the effect of individual endothelial factors, as previously described.8 We do not consider the mouse cuff model to be an ideal model of human atherosclerosis; however, we believe it to be close to the initial lesion of human atherosclerosis (type 1 lesion). Neointima formation mainly consists of cell components and does not include lipid deposition. It is a simple lesion but not a complex one. We believe cuff-induced neointima formation is associated with inflammation of the adventitia. This is not an exact model of restenosis after angioplasty because it avoids direct injury of endothelial cells. However, the restenosis after angioplasty is thought to be mainly due to an increased cell component rather than lipid deposition, and the cuff model can be investigated for a potential link between insulin resistance and restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention.

This is the first study to demonstrate that IRS-2 is protective against vascular neointima formation in response to vessel injury. At 8 weeks, although both IRS-1-/- and IRS-2-/- mice showed hypertriglyceridemia, hypertension, and hyperinsulinemia, the metabolic abnormalities were greater in the IRS-2-/- mice than in the IRS-1-/- mice and the IRS-2-/- mice exhibited greater neointima formation than the IRS-1-/- and wild-type mice. At 20 weeks, the IRS-2-/- mice but not the IRS-1-/- mice had type 2 diabetes and the IRS-2-/- mice had greater neointima formation than the IRS-1-/- and wild-type mice. The IRS-1-/- mice failed to show greater neointima formation than the wild-type mice at 8 weeks but did show greater neointima formation at 20 weeks. Thus, the increased neointima formation in the IRS-1-/- and IRS-2-/- mice is likely to be related to abnormalities induced by the altered metabolic milieu in insulin-resistant states. Nevertheless, we cannot completely exclude the possibility that IRS-2 has a direct protective effect on neointima formation because IRS-2 was much more abundantly expressed than IRS-1 in the vessels and IRS-2 expression tended to be lower at 20 weeks than at 8 weeks in the IRS-1-/- mice. These findings collectively indicate that a lack of IRS-2 renders the vasculature more susceptible to injury in the abnormal metabolic milieu and that IRS-2 may have a protective effect on neointima formation.

Hypothesizing that the vascular endothelial cell dysfunction precedes the progression of atherosclerosis, we compared the endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation response among the IRS-1-/-, IRS-2-/-, and wild-type mice. The results showed that endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation was impaired in the IRS-2-/- mice at 20 weeks but not at 8 weeks, when the neointima of the IRS-2-/- mice began to be formed. There was mild impairment of endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation in the IRS-1-/- mice at 20 weeks, even though the IRS-1-/- mice did not show increased neointima formation at 8 weeks. On the basis of these observations, the endothelial cell dysfunction may not precede the formation of neointima, and it may be a consequence of the continued constellation of multiple risk factors rather than the lack of IRS-1 or IRS-2 in the vessels.

In summary, this study provides the first evidence that IRS-2 is protective and retards the development of neointima formation that occurs in response to vessel injury in insulin-resistant states.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was partly supported by a grant (No. 10877117) from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture and by Project Research Grant No. 12–7 of Toho University School of Medicine. We thank Ryuichi Taki, Yuka Yamaguchi, Miyoko Suzuki, and Masahiro Nakamaru for excellent technical assistance and animal care.


*    Footnotes
 
Drs Tetsuya Kubota and Naoto Kubota contributed equally to this work.

Received December 14, 2002; revision received March 14, 2003; accepted March 17, 2003.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Howard G, O’Leary DH, Zaccaro D, et al. Insulin sensitivity and atherosclerosis. Circulation. 1996; 93: 1809–1817.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Ruige JB, Assendelft WJJ, Dekker JM, et al. Insulin and risk of cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis. Circulation. 1998; 98: 398–404.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Hribal ML, Oriente F, Accili D. Mouse models of insulin resistance. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2002; 282: 977–981.
  4. Virkamaki A, Ueki K, Kahn CR. Protein-protein interaction in insulin signaling and the molecular mechanisms of insulin resistance. J Clin Invest. 1999; 103: 931–940.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Kadowaki T. Insights into insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes from knockout mouse models. J Clin Invest. 2000; 106: 459–465.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Tamemoto H, Kadowaki T, Tobe K, et al. Insulin resistance and growth retardation in mice lacking insulin receptor substrate-1. Nature. 1994; 372: 182–186.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Kubota N, Tobe K, Terauchi Y, et al. Disruption of insulin receptor substrte-2 causes type 2 diabetes due to liver insulin resistance and lack of compensatory â-cell hyperplasia. Diabetes. 2000; 49: 1880–1889.[Abstract]
  8. Moroi M, Zhang L, Yasuda T, et al. Interaction of genetic deficiency of endothelial nitric oxide, gender, and pregnancy in vascular response to injury in mice. J Clin Invest. 1998; 101: 1225–1232.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. White MF, Maron R, Kahn CR. Insulin rapidly stimulates tyrosine phosphorylation of a Mr 185,000 protein in intact cells. Nature. 1985; 318: 183–186.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Araki E, Lipes MA, Patti ME, et al. Alternative pathway of insulin signaling in mice with targeted disruption of IRS-1 gene. Nature. 1994; 372: 186–190.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Abe H, Yamada N, Kamata K, et al. Hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, and impaired endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation in mice lacking insulin receptor substrate-1. J Clin Invest. 1998; 101: 1784–1788.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Sun XJ, Wang LM, Zhang Y, et al. Role of IRS-2 in insulin and cytokine signaling. Nature. 1995; 377: 173–177.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Patti ME, Sun XJ, Bruening JC, et al. 4PS/insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-2 is alternative substrate of the insulin receptor in IRS-1 deficient mice. J Biol Chem. 1995; 270: 24670–24673.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Yamauchi T, Tobe K, Tamemoto H, et al. Insulin signaling and insulin actions in the muscles and livers of insulin-resistant, insulin receptor substrate 1-deficient mice. Mol Cell Biol. 1996; 16: 3074–3084.[Abstract]
  15. Withers DJ, Gutierrez JS, Towery H, et al. Disruption of IRS-2 causes type-2 diabetes in mice. Nature. 1998; 391: 900–904.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Van Obberghen E, Baron V, Delahaya B, et al. Surfing the insulin signaling web. Eur J Clin Invest. 2001; 31: 966–977.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. NIH, 1985, Publication No. 85–23; revised 1996.
  18. Kobayashi T, Matsumoto T, Kamata K. Mechanisms underlying the chronic pravastatin treatment-induced improvement in the impaired endothelium-dependent aortic relaxation seen in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Br J Pharmacol. 2000; 131: 231–238.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Jiang ZY, Lin YW, Clemont A, et al. Characterization of selective resistance to insulin signaling in the vasculature of obese Zucker (fa/fa) rats. J Clin Invest. 1999; 104: 447–457.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Lindner V, Fingerle J, Reidy MA. Mouse model of arterial injury. Circ Res. 1993; 73: 792–796.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
L. Bertrand, S. Horman, C. Beauloye, and J.-L. Vanoverschelde
Insulin signalling in the heart
Cardiovasc Res, July 15, 2008; 79(2): 238 - 248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
R. Muniyappa, M. Montagnani, K. K. Koh, and M. J. Quon
Cardiovascular Actions of Insulin
Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2007; 28(5): 463 - 491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
C.-P. Liang, S. Han, T. Senokuchi, and A. R. Tall
The Macrophage at the Crossroads of Insulin Resistance and Atherosclerosis
Circ. Res., June 8, 2007; 100(11): 1546 - 1555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
J. Nigro, N. Osman, A. M. Dart, and P. J. Little
Insulin Resistance and Atherosclerosis
Endocr. Rev., May 1, 2006; 27(3): 242 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
M. Ii, H. Takenaka, J. Asai, K. Ibusuki, Y. Mizukami, K. Maruyama, Y.-s. Yoon, A. Wecker, C. Luedemann, E. Eaton, et al.
Endothelial Progenitor Thrombospondin-1 Mediates Diabetes-Induced Delay in Reendothelialization Following Arterial Injury
Circ. Res., March 17, 2006; 98(5): 697 - 704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
R. Takeda, H. Nishimatsu, E. Suzuki, H. Satonaka, D. Nagata, S. Oba, M. Sata, M. Takahashi, Y. Yamamoto, Y. Terauchi, et al.
Ghrelin Improves Renal Function in Mice with Ischemic Acute Renal Failure
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 113 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
Y. Zheng, H. Yamada, K. Sakamoto, S. Horita, M. Kunimi, Y. Endo, Y. Li, K. Tobe, Y. Terauchi, T. Kadowaki, et al.
Roles of Insulin Receptor Substrates in Insulin-Induced Stimulation of Renal Proximal Bicarbonate Absorption
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2005; 16(8): 2288 - 2295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Dandona, A. Aljada, A. Chaudhuri, P. Mohanty, and R. Garg
Metabolic Syndrome: A Comprehensive Perspective Based on Interactions Between Obesity, Diabetes, and Inflammation
Circulation, March 22, 2005; 111(11): 1448 - 1454.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
K. Yamamoto, K. Onoda, Y. Sawada, K. Fujinaga, K. Imanaka-Yoshida, H. Shimpo, T. Yoshida, and I. Yada
Tenascin-C is an essential factor for neointimal hyperplasia after aortotomy in mice
Cardiovasc Res, February 15, 2005; 65(3): 737 - 742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. Dandona, A. Chaudhuri, and A. Aljada
The Relationship of Fasting Serum Radioimmune Insulin Levels to Incident Coronary Heart Disease in an Insulin-Treated Diabetic Cohort
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2004; 89(11): 5868 - 5869.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
V. A. Fonseca, J. Diez, and D. B. McNamara
Decreasing Restenosis Following Angioplasty: The potential of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} agonists
Diabetes Care, November 1, 2004; 27(11): 2764 - 2766.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. E. Hartman, J. C. O'Connor, J. P. Godbout, K. D. Minor, V. R. Mazzocco, and G. G. Freund
Insulin Receptor Substrate-2-dependent Interleukin-4 Signaling in Macrophages Is Impaired in Two Models of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
J. Biol. Chem., July 2, 2004; 279(27): 28045 - 28050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
T. Kobayashi, T. Matsumoto, K. Ooishi, and K. Kamata
Differential expression of {alpha}2D-adrenoceptor and eNOS in aortas from early and later stages of diabetes in Goto-Kakizaki rats
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2004; 287(1): H135 - H148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
T. Kadowaki and N. Kubota
Protective Role of Imatinib in Atherosclerosis
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2004; 24(5): 801 - 803.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
107/24/3073    most recent
01.CIR.0000070937.52035.25v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kubota, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yamaguchi, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kubota, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yamaguchi, T.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal models of human disease