| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2003;107:2969.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Basic Science Reports |
From The International Heart Institute of Montana Foundation at St Patrick Hospital and Health Sciences Center and University of Montana, Missoula, Mont. Drs Goetz and Birnbaum are presently at the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany; Dr Lansac is presently at the Chirurgie Thoracique et Cardiovasculaire, Hopital Pitié-Salpetrierè, Paris, France; and Dr Pekar is currently at Roosevelt Hospital, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia.
Correspondence to Carlos M.G. Duran, MD, PhD, The International Heart Institute of Montana, 554 W Broadway, Missoula, MT 59802. E-mail duran{at}saintpatrick.org
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Sonomicrometric crystals were implanted in 6 sheep at the insertion of stay chords at anterior mitral leaflet (S1 and S2), papillary muscle tips, fibrous trigones, mitral annulus, and the tip of the anterior leaflet (AL). Distances between crystals were recorded before and after section of stay chords. During the cardiac cycle, the angle
between mitral annulus and AL changed by +54.2±12.4 degrees; the angles between mitral annulus and S1 (ß1) changed by +25.7±14.6 degrees, and between mitral annulus and S2 (ß2) by +20.4±7.8 degrees. During diastole, AL twice crossed the virtual plane formed by the stay chords: during E-wave by a maximum of 6.5 mm (mean, 2.5±2.2 mm) and during A-wave by a maximum of 3.2 mm (mean, 1.7±0.9 mm). After section of both stay chords, total anterior mitral leaflet motion increased as follows: AL, +6.9±3.4 degrees; S1, +13.1±4.4 degrees; and S2, +30.9±11.7 degrees (P<0.05).
Conclusions Although the lateral movement of anterior mitral leaflet is limited by stay chords, the midportion moves unimpaired toward the septum, like a sail, between the 2 stay chords during diastole. A diastolic left ventricular-inflow and systolic left ventricular-outflow funnel mechanism is created. Stay chord section increased lateral anterior mitral leaflet movement.
Key Words: mitral valve dynamics systolic anterior motion
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All animals received humane care in accordance with the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care formulated by the Animal Welfare Act in the Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals prepared by the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources and published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1996). The use of these animals for this research was also reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Montana.
Surgical Protocol
Anesthesia and surgical preparation of sheep were performed as previously described.8 Nine 2-mm ultrasonic crystals (Sonometrics Corporation) were implanted and secured with 5/0 polypropylene sutures at the atrial aspect of the insertion points of the 2 stay chords in the anterior leaflet (S1 and S2), both papillary muscle tips (M1 and M2), on the mitral annulus at the midpoint of the posterior and lateral extremities of the mitral annulus (P1 and P2), and at both fibrous trigones (T1 and T2). One 1-mm crystal was placed at the midpoint of the free margin of the anterior (AL) leaflet (Figures 1 and 2
).
|
|
All electrodes, except those corresponding to the papillary muscle tips, were exteriorized through the left atriotomy. The papillary muscle electrodes were exteriorized through the apex. Two insulated wires were placed around the stay chords close to their leaflet insertion. Both wires were exteriorized through the LV septum and right ventricular outflow tract to prevent injury to other basal or marginal chords. A high-fidelity, catheter-tipped pressure transducer (Model 510, Millar Instruments) was placed within the lumen of the proximal ascending aorta and in the LV cavity through the apex.
After weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass and under hemodynamically stable conditions (at least 30 minutes after weaning from bypass), baseline recordings were taken. Section of the 2 stay chords was achieved in the beating heart by applying diathermia to the 2 wires placed around them. A second set of data were then recorded. Epicardial echocardiography was performed before and after chordal section to detect the possible presence of mitral incompetence.
Definition of the Phases of the Cardiac Cycle
Geometric changes were time related to each phase of the cardiac cycle, as defined from the aortic and LV pressure curves. End of diastole was defined as the point of increasing LV pressure tracing (dP/dt>0). End of isovolumic contraction was defined as the beginning of ejection at the crossing point of the LV and aortic pressure curves (gradient LV/aorta pressures=0). The dicrotic notch in the aortic pressure curve defined end ejection. E-wave was defined as the first opening motion of the anterior mitral leaflet attributable to passive LV inflow. A-wave, following the E-wave, was defined as the second opening motion of the anterior mitral leaflet attributable to atrial contraction and active LV inflow.9
Definition of Anatomic Regions and Angles
The stay chords were defined as the distance between the papillary muscle tips at the origin of the stay chords (M1 and M2) and the insertion point of the stay chords in the anterior leaflet (S1 and S2) (Figure 1). The stay chord plane was defined as the plane between the 2 papillary muscle tips (M1 and M2) and the insertion of the 2 stay chords in the anterior leaflet (S1 and S2). The anterior (T1) and posterior (T2) fibrous trigones were identified by pulling on the midpoint of the anterior mitral leaflet free margin, which created 2 folds terminating at the trigones.10 The mitral annulus plane was defined as the plane that included both fibrous trigones (T1 and T2) and the middle of the posterior mitral annulus. The motion of the anterior mitral leaflet was defined by the changes of 3 angles during the cardiac cycle: (1) the angle
between the mitral annulus plane and the plane of the fibrous trigones T1 and T2 and the tip of the anterior mitral leaflet (AL), (2) the angle ß1 between the mitral annulus plane and the plane of the fibrous trigones T1 and T2 and insertion S1 on the anterior mitral leaflet, and (3) the angle ß2 between the mitral annulus plane and the plane of the fibrous trigones T1 and T2 and the insertion S2 on the anterior mitral leaflet (Figure 2).
Data Acquisition
Two recordings were taken in each sheep at baseline and after section of the stay chords in the beating heart. Distances between crystals were measured with Sonometrics Digital Ultrasonic Measurement System TRX Series using 10 transmitter/receiver crystals. A postprocessing program (Sonometrics Corporation) was used to examine each individual distance between crystals and for 3D reconstruction of the crystal coordinates.11 The data sampling rate was 200 Hz. Millar pressure transducer control units (TCB 600) and MIKRO-TIP pressure transducers (Millar Instruments, Inc) were used to obtain the LV and aortic pressures. Pulmonary and left atrial pressures were taken through a 20-gauge needle and a conventional pressure transducer. Epicardial 2D echocardiography with PW- and color-Doppler was used to determine mitral regurgitation before and after section of the stay chords.
Measurement and Statistical Analysis Methods
Distances were explored in a coordinate-independent analysis, using only distance measurements.12 After close examination of the data, 3 consecutive heartbeats that contained the least amount of noise were chosen for analysis. Summary statistics are reported as mean±SD. Hemodynamic and geometric measures were compared using the 2-tailed t test for paired comparisons (baseline versus chordal section), with a significance level P<0.05 (corrected by stepdown Bonferroni for multiple pairwise comparisons). Statistical analyses were done using the SAS/STAT software MULTTEST procedure (SAS Institute, Inc).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Normal Motion of the Anterior Mitral Leaflet
At end systole, the angle ß1 was 37.9±11.7 degrees (Table 2, Figure 2A). It increased during diastole with the E-wave to 63.6±7.9 degrees and with the A-wave to 63.7±9.7 degrees. This corresponded to an increase of +25.7±14.6 and +25.8±18.4 degrees, respectively (Table 3). The angle ß2 was 35.9±12.9 degrees at end systole and increased during diastole with the E-wave to 56.3±9.7 degrees and with the A-wave to 57.1±11.4 degrees, corresponding to an increase of +20.4±7.8 and +21.2±9.5 degrees, respectively. The angle
was 19.3±6.0 degrees at end systole, which was significantly smaller than ß1 and ß2 (P<0.05). Therefore, the central part of the anterior mitral leaflet moved closer to the mitral annulus than the lateral aspects of the leaflet did because of the restraining effect of the stay chords (Figure 1a). A systolic LV outflow funnel was formed by the transverse curvature of the anterior mitral leaflet.
|
|
During diastole, the angle
increased with the E-wave to 73.5±12.1 degrees and with the A-wave to 68.9±13.1 degrees, an increase from systole of +54.2±12.4 degrees at the E-wave and +46.8±21.7 degrees at the A-wave (Table 3). The diastolic ß1 and ß2 angles were similar, but both were significantly smaller than the
angle during the E- and A-waves (P<0.05). Therefore, the anterior mitral leaflet did not move uniformly toward the septum during diastole. Its central part moved unimpeded, whereas its lateral aspects were restrained (Figures 1A, 2A, and 3![]()
A). 3D reconstruction showed the anterior leaflet tip moving like a sail between the two stay chords during diastole. When a virtual plane formed by the stay chords (M1-S1 and M2-S2) was constructed, we observed that the tip of the anterior leaflet crossed this plane twice during diastole. After crossing the stay chord plane, the maximum distance between the tip of the anterior leaflet and this plane was 6.5 mm (mean, 2.5±2.2 mm) with the E-wave and 3.2 mm (mean, 1.7±0.9 mm) with the A-wave. Therefore, during diastole, the anterior leaflet tip waves twice between the stay chords. This disparity in the diastolic shape of the anterior leaflet forms a diastolic inflow funnel (Figure 1A).
|
Motion of the Anterior Mitral Leaflet After Section of the Stay Chords
After section of the stay chords (Figures 1B and 2
B), the systolic angles decreased significantly from their baseline value by -5.1±2.5 degrees in ß1 and by -17.3±6.7 degrees in ß2. The
angle changed by only -1.5±0.9 degrees (Table 2). The distances between the mitral annulus plane and S1 and S2 decreased by -0.3±0.2 mm (P<0.05) and -3.1±1.2 mm (P<0.05), respectively, although no significant change was measured in the distance between the mitral annulus and the tip of the anterior leaflet. Distances from papillary muscle tips to insertion of the stay chords on the anterior mitral leaflet increased at M1-S1 by +0.4±0.2 mm and at M2-S2 by +2.7±1.3 mm (P<0.05).
After stay chord section, the angles increased from the baseline value during the E-wave at S1 (ß1) by +8.2±2.0 degrees, at S2 (ß2) by +12.2±3.6 degrees, and at AL (
) by only +4.5±3.4 degrees during diastole (P<0.05) (Table 2). Also, the amplitude of the change in angle from end systole to the diastolic E- and A-waves increased significantly (Table 3). The angle ß1 increased during E-wave by +13.1±4.4 degrees (P<0.05) and during A-wave by +6.5±12.9 degrees. The ß2 angle increased during E-wave by +30.9±11.7 degrees (P<0.05) and during A-wave by +19.2±9.2 degrees. The
angle increased during E-wave by only +6.9±3.4 degrees (P<0.05) and during A-wave by +4.9±7.0 degrees. These findings confirm that the stay chords have a restraining effect on the anterior mitral leaflet during diastole, particularly on its lateral portions. Section of the stay chords increased the diastolic excursion of the lateral aspects of the anterior leaflet. Absence of the stay chords resulted in a more homogeneous motion of the whole anterior leaflet (Figure 3B).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The singularity of the 2 anterior stay chords in terms of their location3 and thickness4 made us wonder whether they played a significant role in the mechanism of mitral opening and closure. Furthermore, measurement of their tension in the beating sheep heart has proven to be nearly 3 times higher than their corresponding marginal chord15 and related with the LV pressure.16
As shown in previous studies,6,7 our data confirm that mitral regurgitation does not acutely appear after section of the stay chords. However, their section induced significant changes in the motion of the anterior leaflet. The normal diastolic motion of the anterior mitral leaflet is not homogeneous. Although the central part of the anterior mitral leaflet moves from its systolic coaptation point to the septum during diastole, the motion of the lateral portions of the leaflet are significantly limited by the presence of the 2 stay chords. During diastole, the anterior mitral leaflet tip balloons toward the septum, like a sail, between the 2 stay chords. The argument that the lateral portions of the anterior leaflet need not move as far as its central portion because the ventricle is circular might be valid, but the fact that section of the stay chords resulted in an increase in their diastolic excursion also remains valid. During diastole, the normal LV inflow becomes funnel shaped, with a transversely curved anterior leaflet whose concavity is toward the mitral orifice. After section of the 2 stay chords, the central and lateral portions of the anterior leaflet move homogeneously, confirming the restraining effect of the stay chords on the normal motion of the anterior leaflet.
During systole, the angle between the central portion of the anterior leaflet and the mitral annulus is smaller than the angles between the lateral aspects of the leaflet and the annulus (ie, an outflow funnel with concavity toward the outflow tract is formed that should facilitate ejection). After section of the stay chords, the lateral portions of the anterior leaflet become as mobile as the central portion.
Our data show that during diastole, the excursion of the entire anterior leaflet becomes more homogenous after section of the stay chords, bringing it closer to the septum. At the beginning of systole, when the mitral valve is still open, the displaced anterior leaflet possibly increases the Venturi effect that facilitates systolic anterior motion observed after mitral valve repair. This possible mechanism suggests an anti-systolic anterior motion function of the stay chords. After reviewing their previously reported data obtained in the isolated pig heart,6 Obadia recently suggested a similar protective mechanism.17
This systolic increase in mobility of the anterior leaflet at the level of the insertion of the stay chords led Messas et al18 to propose sectioning the stay chords for the surgical treatment of functional ischemic mitral regurgitation. In an ovine model, these authors selectively sectioned the 2 anterior stay chords to abolish their tethering of the body of the leaflet, which increased leaflet coaptation. Additional studies are required before the clinical application of this ingenious technique.
Limitations of the Study
Our conclusions are drawn from only 3 markers on the anterior leaflet. However, the important fact is the relative increase in distances traveled by the central and lateral portions of the leaflet before and after chordal section. Lomholt et al15 have shown tensional changes on the stay chords following increases in LV afterload and contractility. It is therefore possible that the effects of stay chord cutting might be minimized or increased according to LV status. An additional limitation inherent to sonomicrometry is the presence of electrodes, which might interfere with the normal movements of the structures studied. Additionally, the location of the crystals might vary between animals. Aware of this possibility, all crystals were placed by the same surgeon, and their correct positioning was checked after euthanasia of the sheep.
All data were acquired in an anesthetized, open-chest animal model. Because chordal section was undertaken without a second pump run and immediately after baseline readings, the differences between readings before and after chord transection should be valid. Also, it must be emphasized that findings in sheep are not necessarily applicable to the human. Sheep have relatively few secondary chords in the anterior leaflet, and they are relatively thinner than in the human. Therefore, the role of the stay chords may be more pronounced in humans.
Conclusion
Anterior leaflet second-order stay chords are responsible for the normal nonhomogeneous motion of the anterior mitral leaflet. The lateral portions of the anterior mitral leaflet are restrained by the stay chords, whereas the central portion moves between the stay chords. This nonhomogeneous motion creates diastolic inflow and systolic outflow funnels that, theoretically, should facilitate LV flow patterns. Section of the stay chords results in an increase in mobility of the lateral aspects of the anterior leaflet. Until additional knowledge of the role of the anterior basal chords and especially the stay chords becomes available, a conscious respect for the integrity of the whole submitral apparatus seems warranted.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received November 12, 2002; revision received February 25, 2003; accepted March 10, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Kumar N, Kumar M, Duran CM. A revised terminology for recording surgical findings of the mitral valve. J Heart Valve Dis. 1995; 4: 7075.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Yacoub M. Anatomy of the mitral valve chordae and cusps. In: Kalmanson D, ed. The Mitral Valve. Acton, Mass: Publishing Sciences Group; 1976: 1520.
4. Lam JH, Ranganathan N, Wigle ED, et al. Morphology of the human mitral valve, I: chordae tendineae. A new classification. Circulation. 1970; 41: 449458.
5. van Rijk-Zwikker GL, Delemarre BJ, Huysmans HA. Mitral valve anatomy and morphology: relevance to mitral valve replacement and valve reconstruction. J Cardiac Surg. 1994; 9: 255261.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Obadia JF, Casali C, Chassignolle JF, et al. Mitral subvalvular apparatus: different functions of primary and secondary chordae. Circulation. 1997; 96: 31243128.
7. Timek TA, Nielsen SL, Green GR, et al. Influence of anterior mitral leaflet second-order chordae on leaflet dynamics and valve competence. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001; 72: 535540.
8. Lansac E, Lim HS, Shomura Y, et al. Aortic and pulmonary root: are their dynamics similar? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002; 21: 268275.
9. Guyton AC. Textbook of Medical Physiology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1996.
10. Choo SJ, Olomon J, Bowles C, et al. An in vitro study of the correlation between aortic valve diameter and mitral intertrigonal distance: a simple method to select the correct mitral annuloplasty ring size. J Heart Valve Dis. 1998; 7: 593597.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Smith W, Vesely I. Three-dimensional ultrasonic micrometer for use in cardiovascular research. Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the IEEE-EMBS, Orlando, Fla, October 31 to November 3, 1991.
12. Dagum P, Timek TA, Green GR, et al. Coordinate-free analysis of mitral valve dynamics in normal and ischemic hearts. Circulation. 2000; 102: III62III69.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Carpentier A. Cardiac valve surgery: the "French correction." J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983; 86: 323337.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Soyer R, Bouchart F, Bessou JP, et al. Mitral valve reconstruction: long-term results of 120 cases. Cardiovasc Surg. 1996; 4: 813819.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Lomholt M, Nielsen SL, Hansen SB, et al. Differential tension between secondary and primary mitral chordae in an acute in vivo porcine model. J Heart Valve Dis. 2002; 11: 337345.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Nielsen SL, Green GR, Dagum P, et al. Why is the relationship between anterior mitral leaflet strut chordae tension and left ventricular pressure during isovolumic contraction not linear? Circulation. 1999; 100: I-575.
17. Obadia JF. Second order anterior mitral leaflets play a role in preventing systolic anterior motion. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002; 73: 16881696.
18. Messas E, Guerrero JL, Handschumacher MD, et al. Chordal cutting: a new therapeutic approach for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2001; 104: 19581963.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Votta, E. Caiani, F. Veronesi, M. Soncini, F. M. Montevecchi, and A. Redaelli Mitral valve finite-element modelling from ultrasound data: a pilot study for a new approach to understand mitral function and clinical scenarios Phil Trans R Soc A, September 28, 2008; 366(1879): 3411 - 3434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Borger, P. M. Murphy, A. Alam, S. Fazel, M. Maganti, S. Armstrong, V. Rao, and T. E. David Initial results of the chordal-cutting operation for ischemic mitral regurgitation J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2007; 133(6): 1483 - 1492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Messas, C. Yosefy, M. Chaput, J. L. Guerrero, S. Sullivan, P. Menasche, A. Carpentier, M. Desnos, A. A. Hagege, G. J. Vlahakes, et al. Chordal Cutting Does Not Adversely Affect Left Ventricle Contractile Function Circulation, July 4, 2006; 114(1_suppl): I-524 - I-528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Levine and E. Schwammenthal Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation on the Threshold of a Solution: From Paradoxes to Unifying Concepts Circulation, August 2, 2005; 112(5): 745 - 758. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |