| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2003;107:2926.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Departments of Medicine (E.V., J.-C.T., M.G.B., N.R., M.W., P.G.G., A.D.) and Biostatistics (S.L.), Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Canada.
Correspondence to Anique Ducharme, MD, MSc, or Jean-Claude Tardif, MD, Montreal Heart Institute, 5000 Belanger St East, HIT 1C8 Montreal, Quebec, Canada. E-mail ducharme{at}icm.umontreal.ca or tardifjc@icm.umontreal.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Clinical charts were reviewed and serial ECGs interpreted by a single cardiologist blinded to drug allocation. Patients with AF or flutter on the baseline ECG were excluded. Baseline characteristics were obtained from the SOLVD databases. The mean follow-up was 2.9±1.0 years. Of the 391 patients randomly assigned at MHI, 374 were in sinus rhythm at the time of random assignment, with 186 taking enalapril and 188 taking placebo. Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups except for a higher incidence of previous myocardial infarction in the enalapril group. Fifty-five patients had AF during the follow-up: 10 (5.4%) in the enalapril group and 45 (24%) in the placebo group (P<0.0001). By Cox multivariate analysis, enalapril was the most powerful predictor for risk reduction of AF (hazard ratio, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.44; P<0.0001).
Conclusions Treatment with the ACEi enalapril markedly reduces the risk of development of atrial fibrillation in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
Key Words: angiotensin inhibitors fibrillation heart failure
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Data Collection and Definitions
Baseline characteristics, medical history, and drug therapy at the time of enrollment were obtained from the SOLVD databases. Serial ECGs were not collected specifically for the SOLVD trials. However, the routine clinical follow-up of patients at our institution usually included a 12-lead ECG. Thus, the medical file of each patient was carefully reviewed, and a single experienced cardiologist, blinded to treatment allocation, interpreted every ECG.
AF was defined as rapid oscillations or fibrillatory waves that vary in size, shape, and timing, associated with an irregular, frequently rapid ventricular response.14 For the purpose of this study, paroxysmal AF was defined as episodes in which the patient reverted to sinus rhythm spontaneously, with medical therapy or with a single cardioversion, whereas patients who remained in AF despite changes in medical therapy and/or cardioversion were defined as having persistent AF. Episodes occurring during a 24-hour Holter monitoring were also considered. The end points were the development and time to first occurrence of AF on either one 12-lead ECG and/or a 24-hour Holter monitoring recorded during any available follow-up visits (including research, outpatient clinic, or emergency room visits). Participants with significant supraventricular arrhythmia on the baseline ECG (AF or flutter) were excluded. Patients with a history of arrhythmia (either supraventricular or ventricular) but who were in sinus rhythm on the ECG at the time of random assignment were included.
Statistical Analysis
The baseline characteristics of the two groups were compared by means of Students t test for continuous variables and
2 test for categorical variables. The incidence of AF between the two groups was compared by means of the
2 test. Time to the first occurrence of AF during the follow-up was analyzed by means of Kaplan-Meier curves and compared by means of the log-rank test. To analyze the effect of enalapril on development of AF, a Cox regression analysis was used to take into account the effect of potential confounding baseline variables (age, sex, New York Heart Association class, history of supraventricular or ventricular arrhythmia, ischemic cause, diabetes, and ejection fraction) and time-dependent variables (systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, serum potassium, and drug therapy). Cox proportional-hazard models were performed for each variable with treatment (enalapril) forced in all models. Variables with a probability value ≤0.2 were included in a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. For time-dependent variables, the last value before the occurrence of AF was taken or, if AF did not develop in the patient, the value at the last visit was used.
Subgroup analysis was conducted by means of the
2 test. Preliminary assumptions were verified before all analysis. A probability value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed with SAS version 8.2 (SAS Institute Inc).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Baseline Characteristics
The baseline characteristics of the two groups are presented in Table 1. The majority of patients were male, white, with severe LV dysfunction (mean LVEF=27%) of ischemic cause and with NYHA class II symptoms. Medications were well balanced between the two groups. Patients taking enalapril had a higher prevalence of previous myocardial infarction, and there was a trend toward an increase in current smoker status (P=0.072).
|
Development of Atrial Fibrillation
A total of 1491 ECGs were examined: 693 in the placebo group and 798 in the enalapril group (3.7±4.1 and 4.3±5.0 ECGs per patient, respectively, P=NS). Similarly, 43 Holter examinations were performed: 19 and 24 in the placebo and enalapril groups (P=NS). A total of 55 patients presented ≥1 episode of AF during the 2.9 years of follow-up: 10 (5.4%) in the enalapril group and 45 (24%) in the placebo group (P<0.0001), an absolute risk reduction of 18.6%. A brief description of the episodes is provided in Table 2. The majority were paroxysmal and required hospitalization for worsening HF. Despite the new onset of AF in these patients, electrical cardioversion was only performed in a minority. During follow-up, the probability of remaining in sinus rhythm was significantly higher with enalapril than with placebo (P<0.0001, Figure 1). By Cox multivariate analysis (Table 3), allocation to enalapril was the most powerful predictor for reduction in the incidence of AF (hazard ratio [HR]=0.22; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.44; P<0.0001). Although the numbers are small, the presence of an ischemic case for LV dysfunction also had an impact on the risk of development of AF (HR=4.9; 95% CI, 2.32 to 10.41; P<0.0001). Age, history of supraventricular arrhythmia, and diuretic use tended to increase the risk of development of AF without reaching significance in the multivariate analysis.
|
|
|
Since the baseline characteristics suggested a trend toward a higher prevalence of supraventricular arrhythmia before random assignment in the placebo group (7.5% versus 3.8%, P=0.121), we repeated the same analysis of the effect of enalapril on AF incidence after excluding patients (n=21) with a history of supraventricular arrhythmia at baseline. Results remained unchanged, with significantly fewer patients having development of AF with enalapril (8 patients, 4.5%) than with placebo (40 patients, 23%; P<0.0001).
We further stratified the analysis according to baseline functional status by analyzing the effect of enalapril on the incidence of AF in the two trial arms (prevention and treatment) separately. The beneficial effect of enalapril on the development of AF seemed more marked in the less symptomatic patients: in the SOLVD prevention arm, 4 patients (3.2%) had AF in the enalapril group versus 31 patients (24.6%) in the placebo group (P<0.0001), whereas in the treatment arm, 6 patients (9.8%) had AF with enalapril versus 14 (22.6%) with placebo (P=0.055). Kaplan-Meier curves for time to occurrence of AF in the two trial arms are shown in Figures 2 and 3
.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mechanisms by which ACE inhibition exerts its protective effect against AF development in HF are not completely understood. One potential explanation may reside in the inhibition of the neurohormonal activation that occurs in congestive heart failure and parallels the severity of the disease. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is involved in many events that could promote AF. Angiotensin II is a potent promoter of fibrosis, leading to cardiac fibroblast proliferation and reduced collagenase activity.1719 Among the underlying effectors through which angiotensin II exerts its action, mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and specifically extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) seem to play a major role. Increased atrial expression of ACE and ERK have been demonstrated in experimental HF9 and in the atrial tissue of patients with a history of AF,20 together with AT1 receptor downregulation and AT2 upregulation.21 When these patients were treated with ACEi, the amount of activated ERK2 was reduced, which suggests a causal relation. Experimentally, the atrial structural changes in HF induced by rapid ventricular pacing are attenuated when the ACEi enalapril is given at the onset of pacing and the animals followed for 5 weeks.10 This is accompanied by a significant reduction in atrial fibrosis and decreased vulnerability of these animals to AF. Whether this represents a direct effect of ACEi on the atrial fibrotic process or is just a consequence of decreased left atrial pressure induced by enalapril is unclear. Angiotensin II causes an increase in atrial pressure,22 and increased levels of atrial AT1 receptors mRNA have also been demonstrated in response to elevated atrial pressure.23 Atrial stretch induced by increased atrial pressure may be involved in the initiation and pathogenesis of AF through shortening of refractory period and lengthening of intra-atrial conduction time.24,25 Because ACEi cause a decline in both left atrial26 and LV end-diastolic pressures in patients with HF,9 it is possible that these agents may decrease the susceptibility to AF simply by lowering atrial pressure and wall stress and consequently by attenuating left atrial enlargement. This hypothesis, however, seems less probable, since Li and colleagues9 have shown experimentally a reduction in atrial fibrosis only with enalapril despite a similar decrease in left atrial pressure with hydralazine/isosorbide.
In the failing human heart, neurohormonal activation, LV remodeling, elevated left atrial pressure, and atrial fibrosis probably interact to provide a pathophysiologic substrate for AF, which can thus be, at least partially, reversible with ACEi therapy.
Among other potentially beneficial mechanisms, a direct antiarrhythmic effect of ACEi on AF development cannot be excluded. Angiotensin II appears to contribute directly to atrial electrical remodeling, even in the absence of HF. The shortening of the atrial refractory period that occurs during rapid atrial pacing becomes more marked in the presence of angiotensin II but was prevented by treatment with candesartan or captopril.22 In patients with persistent AF, a beneficial effect of irbesartan on AF recurrence was observed when it was started 3 weeks before electrical cardioversion and combined with amiodarone.27 Most of the benefit of the AT1 receptor blocker occurred during the first 2 months after conversion, suggesting a role for irbesartan on the atrial electrical remodeling process occurring after cardioversion. The rapidly diverging Kaplan-Meier curves in our study also suggest that enalapril acted in part through functional changes. Finally, enalapril appeared to be more effective in preventing AF in the least symptomatic population. Whether these differences reflect atrial structural changes that are potentially still reversible in the least symptomatic patients or are simply caused by chance (because of the small number of patients involved) remains unknown. Taken together, these experimental and clinical studies suggest that treatment interfering with the renin-angiotensin system (with either ACEi or angiotensin II receptors blockers) have protective effects against AF development, acting through various potential mechanisms in patients with HF.
Clinical Implications
Heart failure promotes AF, and the latter increases the risk of thromboembolism,28 compromises cardiac function, and increases mortality rates in patients with concomitant HF. Preventing AF with ACEi may thus improve the short- and long-term prognosis of patients with CHF, by breaking this vicious cycle and avoiding the potential risk of antiarrhythmic agents. We can also speculate that the stroke prevention effect of ramipril obtained in the HOPE (Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation) study may be due at least partly to reduction in the incidence of AF in their high-risk population.29 With an absolute risk reduction of 18.6% when enalapril is given to patients with HF, 5 patients with congestive HF would need to be treated for 2.9 years to prevent 1 episode of AF.
Limitations of the Study
This study is a retrospective analysis of SOLVD, and the ECGs and Holter monitoring were not collected as an integral part of the studies. Nevertheless, all the available data, regardless of the settings in which they were obtained (during hospitalizations, clinical, research or emergency room visits), were analyzed prospectively and interpreted carefully by a single experienced cardiologist, blinded to treatment allocation.
Conclusions
ACE inhibition with enalapril markedly reduces the risk of development of AF in patients with LV systolic dysfunction.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received January 24, 2003; accepted March 17, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Middlekauff HR, Stevenson WG, Stevenson LW. Prognostic significance of atrial fibrillation in advanced heart failure: a study of 390 patients. Circulation. 1991; 84: 4048.
3. Pozzoli M, Cioffi G, Traversi E, et al. Predictors of primary atrial fibrillation and concomitant clinical and hemodynamic changes in patients with chronic heart failure: a prospective study in 344 patients with baseline sinus rhythm. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 32: 197204.
4. Dries DL, Exner DV, Gersh BJ, et al. Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk for mortality and heart failure progression in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a retrospective analysis of the SOLVD trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 32: 695703.
5. Bourassa MG, Gurné O, Bangdiwala SI, et al. Natural history and patterns of current practice in heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 22 (suppl A): 14A19A.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Mathew J, Hunsberger S, Fleg J, et al. Incidence, predictive factors, and prognostic significance of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias in congestive heart failure. Chest. 2000; 118: 914922.
7. Li D, Fareh S, Leung TK, et al. Promotion of atrial fibrillation by heart failure in dogs: atrial remodeling of a different sort. Circulation. 1999; 100: 8795.
8. Shi Y, Ducharme A, Li D, et al. Remodeling of atrial dimensions and emptying function in canine models of atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Res. 2001; 52: 217225.
9. Li D, Shinagawa K, Pang L, et al. Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on the development of the atrial fibrillation substrate in dogs with ventricular tachypacing-induced congestive heart failure. Circulation. 2001; 104: 26082614.
10. Shi Y, Li D, Tardif JC, et al. Enalapril effects on atrial remodeling and atrial fibrillation in experimental congestive heart failure. Cardiovasc Res. 2002; 54: 456461.
11. SOLVD Investigators. Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325: 293302.[Abstract]
12. SOLVD Investigators. Effect of enalapril on mortality and the development of heart failure in asymptomatic patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions. N Engl J Med. 1992; 327: 685691.[Abstract]
13. SOLVD Investigators. Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD): rationale, design and methods: two trials that evaluate the effect of enalapril in patients with reduced ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol. 1990; 66: 315322.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Fuster V, Ryden LE, Asinger RW, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38: 12311266.
15. Pedersen OD, Bagger H, Køber L, et al. Trandolapril reduces the incidence of atrial fibrillation after acute myocardial infarction in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation. 1999; 100: 376380.
16. St John Sutton M, Pfeffer MA, Plappert T, et al. Quantitative two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements are major predictors of adverse cardiovascular events after acute myocardial infarction: the protective effects of captopril. Circulation. 1994; 89: 6875.
17. Zou Y, Komuro I, Yamazaki T, et al. Cell type-specific angiotensin II-evoked signal transduction pathways: critical roles of Gß
subunit, Src family, and Ras in cardiac fibroblasts. Circ Res. 1998; 82: 337345.
18. Pagés G, Lenormand P, LAllemain G, et al. Mitogen-activated protein kinases p42mapk and p44mapk are required for fibroblast proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993; 90: 83198323.
19. Brilla CG, Zhou G, Matsubara L, et al. Collagen metabolism in cultured adult rat cardiac fibroblasts: response to angiotensin II and aldosterone. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1994; 26: 809820.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Goette A, Staack T, Rocken C, et al. Increased expression of extracellular signal-regulated kinase and angiotensin-converting enzyme in human atria during atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35: 16691677.
21. Goette A, Arndt M, Rocken C, et al. Regulation of angiotensin II receptor subtypes during atrial fibrillation in humans. Circulation. 2000; 101: 26782681.
22. Nakashima H, Kumagai K, Urata H, et al. Angiotensin II antagonist prevents electrical remodeling in atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2000; 101: 26122617.
23. Kaprielian R, Dupont E, Hafizi S, et al. Angiotensin II receptor type 1 mRNA is upregulated in atria of patients with end-stage heart failure. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1997; 29: 22992304.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Solti F, Vecsey T, Kékesi V, et al. The effect of atrial dilatation on the genesis of atrial arrhythmias. Cardiovasc Res. 1989; 23: 882886.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Ravelli F, Allessie M. Effects of atrial dilatation on refractory period and vulnerability to atrial fibrillation in the isolated Langendorff-perfused rabbit heart. Circulation. 1997; 96: 16861695.
26. Webster MW, Fitzpatrick MA, Nicholls MG, et al. Effect of enalapril on ventricular arrhythmias in congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 1985; 56: 566569.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Madrid AH, Bueno MG, Rebollo MG, et al. Use of irbesartan to maintain sinus rhythm in patients with long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2002; 106: 331336.
28. Lamassa M, Di Carlo A, Pracucci G, et al. Characteristics, outcome, and care of stroke associated with atrial fibrillation in Europe. Stroke. 2001; 32: 392398.
29. Bosch J, Yusuf S, Pogue J, et al. Use of ramipril in preventing stroke: double blind randomised trial. BMJ. 2002; 324: 699702.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Ozben, M. Sumerkan, A. M. Tanrikulu, N. Papila-Topal, A. S. Fak, and A. Toprak Perindopril decreases P wave dispersion in patients with stage 1 hypertension Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, June 1, 2009; 10(2): 85 - 90. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Anter, M. Jessup, and D. J. Callans Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure: Treatment Considerations for a Dual Epidemic Circulation, May 12, 2009; 119(18): 2516 - 2525. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
The GISSI-AF Investigators Valsartan for Prevention of Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation N. Engl. J. Med., April 16, 2009; 360(16): 1606 - 1617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Almroth, N. Hoglund, K. Boman, A. Englund, S. Jensen, B. Kjellman, P. Tornvall, and M. Rosenqvist Atorvastatin and persistent atrial fibrillation following cardioversion: a randomized placebo-controlled multicentre study Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2009; 30(7): 827 - 833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Balasubramaniam and P M Kistler Atrial fibrillation in heart failure: the chicken or the egg? Heart, April 1, 2009; 95(7): 535 - 539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kato, T. Fujimaki, T. Yoshida, M. Oguri, K. Yajima, T. Hibino, and T. Murohara Impact of matrix metalloproteinase-2 levels on long-term outcome following pharmacological or electrical cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation Europace, March 1, 2009; 11(3): 332 - 337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Belluzzi, L. Sernesi, P. Preti, F. Salinaro, M. L. Fonte, and S. Perlini Prevention of recurrent lone atrial fibrillation by the angiotensin-II converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril in normotensive patients. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 6, 2009; 53(1): 24 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Adam, H.-R. Neuberger, M. Bohm, and U. Laufs Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation With 3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl Coenzyme A Reductase Inhibitors Circulation, September 16, 2008; 118(12): 1285 - 1293. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Serra and M. Bendersky Review: Atrial fibrillation and renin-angiotensin system Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, June 1, 2008; 2(3): 215 - 223. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Nieuwlaat, M. H. Prins, J.-Y. Le Heuzey, P. E. Vardas, E. Aliot, M. Santini, S. M. Cobbe, J. W.M.G. Widdershoven, L. H. Baur, S. Levy, et al. Prognosis, disease progression, and treatment of atrial fibrillation patients during 1 year: follow-up of the Euro Heart Survey on Atrial Fibrillation Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2008; 29(9): 1181 - 1189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nattel, B. Burstein, and D. Dobrev Atrial Remodeling and Atrial Fibrillation: Mechanisms and Implications Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol, April 1, 2008; 1(1): 62 - 73. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Casaclang-Verzosa, B. J. Gersh, and T. S.M. Tsang Structural and functional remodeling of the left atrium: clinical and therapeutic implications for atrial fibrillation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2008; 51(1): 1 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. T. Issac, H. Dokainish, and N. M. Lakkis Role of Inflammation in Initiation and Perpetuation of Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review of the Published Data J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 20, 2007; 50(21): 2021 - 2028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-R. Neuberger, C. Mewis, D. J. van Veldhuisen, U. Schotten, I. C. van Gelder, M. A. Allessie, and M. Bohm Management of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2007; 28(21): 2568 - 2577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Pretorius, B. S. Donahue, C. Yu, J. P. Greelish, D. M. Roden, and N. J. Brown Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 as a Predictor of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circulation, September 11, 2007; 116(11_suppl): I-1 - I-7. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-C. Tardif and M. Talajic Perindopril and prevention of atrial fibrillation Eur. Heart J. Suppl., September 1, 2007; 9(suppl_E): E25 - E29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Authors/Task Force Members:, G. Mancia, G. De Backer, A. Dominiczak, R. Cifkova, R. Fagard, G. Germano, G. Grassi, A. M. Heagerty, S. E. Kjeldsen, et al. 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur. Heart J., June 11, 2007; (2007) ehm236v1. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. C. Van Gelder Rhythm control for atrial fibrillation: Non-channel antiarrhythmic drugs are en vogue Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2007; 74(1): 8 - 10. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Shiroshita-Takeshita, B. J.J.M. Brundel, B. Burstein, T.-K. Leung, H. Mitamura, S. Ogawa, and S. Nattel Effects of simvastatin on the development of the atrial fibrillation substrate in dogs with congestive heart failure Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2007; 74(1): 75 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Corell, F. Gustafsson, M. Schou, J. Markenvard, T. Nielsen, and P. Hildebrandt Prevalence and prognostic significance of atrial fibrillation in outpatients with heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction Eur J Heart Fail, March 1, 2007; 9(3): 258 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. J. Dzau, E. M. Antman, H. R. Black, D. L. Hayes, J. E. Manson, J. Plutzky, J. J. Popma, and W. Stevenson The Cardiovascular Disease Continuum Validated: Clinical Evidence of Improved Patient Outcomes: Part II: Clinical Trial Evidence (Acute Coronary Syndromes Through Renal Disease) and Future Directions Circulation, December 19, 2006; 114(25): 2871 - 2891. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Williams The Year in Hypertension J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 17, 2006; 48(8): 1698 - 1711. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Okin, K. Wachtell, R. B. Devereux, K. E. Harris, S. Jern, S. E. Kjeldsen, S. Julius, L. H. Lindholm, M. S. Nieminen, J. M. Edelman, et al. Regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy and decreased incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertension. JAMA, September 13, 2006; 296(10): 1242 - 1248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Writing Committee Members, V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, A. B. Curtis, K. A. Ellenbogen, J. L. Halperin, J.-Y. Le Heuzey, G. N. Kay, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: full text: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society Europace, September 1, 2006; 8(9): 651 - 745. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, A. B. Curtis, K. A. Ellenbogen, J. L. Halperin, J.-Y. Le Heuzey, G. N. Kay, J. E. Lowe, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Developed in Collaboration With the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 15, 2006; 48(4): e149 - e246. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, A. B. Curtis, K. A. Ellenbogen, J. L. Halperin, J.-Y. Le Heuzey, G. N. Kay, J. E. Lowe, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation): Developed in Collaboration With the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society Circulation, August 15, 2006; 114(7): e257 - e354. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Strandberg, M.J. P. Raatikainen, M. Niemela, M. Luotolahti, J. Hartiala, and K.E. J. Airaksinen Clinical practicality and predictive value of transoesophageal echocardiography in early cardioversion of atrial fibrillation Europace, June 1, 2006; 8(6): 408 - 412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Ehrlich, S. H. Hohnloser, and S. Nattel Role of angiotensin system and effects of its inhibition in atrial fibrillation: clinical and experimental evidence Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2006; 27(5): 512 - 518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Boos, R. A. Anderson, and G. Y.H. Lip Is atrial fibrillation an inflammatory disorder? Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2006; 27(2): 136 - 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Kalus, C. I. Coleman, and C. M. White The Impact of Suppressing the Renin-Angiotensin System on Atrial Fibrillation J. Clin. Pharmacol., January 1, 2006; 46(1): 21 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Wachtell, M. Lehto, E. Gerdts, M. H. Olsen, B. Hornestam, B. Dahlof, H. Ibsen, S. Julius, S. E. Kjeldsen, L. H. Lindholm, et al. Reply J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 18, 2005; 46(8): 1585 - 1586. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D.M. Engelmann and J. H. Svendsen Inflammation in the genesis and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2005; 26(20): 2083 - 2092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Milliez, N. DeAngelis, C. Rucker-Martin, A. Leenhardt, E. Vicaut, E. Robidel, P. Beaufils, C. Delcayre, and S. N. Hatem Spironolactone reduces fibrosis of dilated atria during heart failure in rats with myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2005; 26(20): 2193 - 2199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nattel Aldosterone antagonism and atrial fibrillation: time for clinical assessment? Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2005; 26(20): 2079 - 2080. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Dudley Jr, N. E. Hoch, L. A. McCann, C. Honeycutt, L. Diamandopoulos, T. Fukai, D. G. Harrison, S. I. Dikalov, and J. Langberg Atrial Fibrillation Increases Production of Superoxide by the Left Atrium and Left Atrial Appendage: Role of the NADPH and Xanthine Oxidases Circulation, August 30, 2005; 112(9): 1266 - 1273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Ariyarajah, N. Asad, A. Tandar, and D. H. Spodick Interatrial Block: Pandemic Prevalence, Significance, and Diagnosis Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2): 970 - 975. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Healey, A. Baranchuk, E. Crystal, C. A. Morillo, M. Garfinkle, S. Yusuf, and S. J. Connolly Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation With Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers: A Meta-Analysis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 7, 2005; 45(11): 1832 - 1839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Gersh, T. S.M. Tsang, M. E. Barnes, and J. B. Seward The changing epidemiology of non-valvular atrial fibrillation: the role of novel risk factors Eur. Heart J. Suppl., May 1, 2005; 7(suppl_C): C5 - C11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-C. Tardif, P. L. L'Allier, P.-F. Keller, and A. Ducharme Reduced atrial fibrillation incidence by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: A possible contributing mechanism: Reply J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 5, 2005; 45(7): 1144 - 1144. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Wachtell, M. Lehto, E. Gerdts, M. H. Olsen, B. Hornestam, B. Dahlof, H. Ibsen, S. Julius, S. E. Kjeldsen, L. H. Lindholm, et al. Angiotensin II receptor blockade reduces new-onset atrial fibrillation and subsequent stroke compared to atenolol: The Losartan Intervention For End point reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 1, 2005; 45(5): 712 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Bourassa Angiotensin II inhibition and prevention of atrial fibrillation and stroke J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 1, 2005; 45(5): 720 - 721. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lehto, S. Snapinn, K. Dickstein, K. Swedberg, M. S. Nieminen, and on behalf of the OPTIMAAL investigators Prognostic risk of atrial fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by left ventricular dysfunction: the OPTIMAAL experience Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2005; 26(4): 350 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. DiDomenico and M. G. Massad Pharmacologic Strategies for Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation After Open Heart Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 79(2): 728 - 740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Kistler, N. C. Davidson, P. Sanders, S. P. Fynn, I. H. Stevenson, S. J. Spence, J. K. Vohra, P. B. Sparks, and J. M. Kalman Absence of acute effects of angiotensin II on atrial electrophysiology in humans J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 4, 2005; 45(1): 154 - 156. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Williams, D. T. Connelly, M. Jackson, A. Bennett, K. Albouaini, and D. M. Todd Does treatment with ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor antagonists prevent atrial fibrillation after dual chamber pacemaker implantation? Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(6): 554 - 559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J.V. McMurray and M. A. Pfeffer The year in heart failure J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 21, 2004; 44(12): 2398 - 2405. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Page Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation N. Engl. J. Med., December 2, 2004; 351(23): 2408 - 2416. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nattel Antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation: Do we need better use, better drugs or a randomized trial of ablation as primary therapy? Can. Med. Assoc. J., September 28, 2004; 171(7): 752 - 753. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Veenhuyzen, C. S. Simpson, and H. Abdollah Atrial fibrillation Can. Med. Assoc. J., September 28, 2004; 171(7): 755 - 760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W Anne, R Willems, N Van der Merwe, F Van de Werf, H Ector, and H Heidbuchel Atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter: preventive effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, and diuretics Heart, September 1, 2004; 90(9): 1025 - 1030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. D. Xiao, S. Fuchs, D. J. Campbell, W. Lewis, S. C. Dudley Jr, V. S. Kasi, B. D. Hoit, G. Keshelava, H. Zhao, M. R. Capecchi, et al. Mice with Cardiac-Restricted Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Have Atrial Enlargement, Cardiac Arrhythmia, and Sudden Death Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2004; 165(3): 1019 - 1032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Hanna, S. Cardin, T.-K. Leung, and S. Nattel Differences in atrial versus ventricular remodeling in dogs with ventricular tachypacing-induced congestive heart failure Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 2004; 63(2): 236 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. P. Knight, A. Desai, J. Coman, M. Faddis, and P. Yong Long-term retention of cardiac resynchronization therapy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 7, 2004; 44(1): 72 - 77. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. L. L'Allier, A. Ducharme, P.-F. Keller, H. Yu, M.-C. Guertin, and J.-C. Tardif Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in hypertensive patients is associated with a reduction in the occurrence of atrial fibrillation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 7, 2004; 44(1): 159 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Dobrev, T. Christ, and U. Ravens Muscarinic subtype-2 receptor autoantibodies: actors or bystanders in human atrial fibrillation? Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2004; 25(13): 1091 - 1092. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Wyse and B. J. Gersh Atrial Fibrillation: A Perspective: Thinking Inside and Outside the Box Circulation, June 29, 2004; 109(25): 3089 - 3095. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nattel Defining "Culprit Mechanisms" in Arrhythmogenic Cardiac Remodeling Circ. Res., June 11, 2004; 94(11): 1403 - 1405. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.J. Shelton, G.C. Kaye, and J.G.F. Cleland Controlling persistent atrial fibrillation QJM, March 1, 2004; 97(3): 179 - 180. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Folkeringa, H.J.G.M. Crijns, and D.J. Van Veldhuisen Prognosis of Atrial Fibrillation in Congestive Heart Failure Circulation, January 20, 2004; 109 (2): e11 - e11. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. V. Anderson Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: ischemia is not the correct measure of benefit J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 17, 2003; 42(12): 2060 - 2062. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Savelieva and A. John Camm Atrial fibrillation and heart failure: natural history and pharmacological treatment Europace, January 1, 2003; 5(s1): S5 - S19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |