| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2003;107:2656.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Brief Rapid Communications |
From the Departments of Radiology (R.A.O., J.D.G., B.S., Y.L., J.P.F., D.L.) and Biomedical Engineering (J.D.G., D.L.), Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.
Correspondence to Reed A. Omary, MD, MS, 676 N St. Clair, Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611. E-mail romary{at}radiology.northwestern.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results In 12 pigs, we accessed femoral arteries percutaneously. We used 6- or 7-French coronary Judkins catheters filled with dilute 4% gadolinium (Gd) contrast agent and coaxially inserted 0.030-inch diameter active guidewires as endovascular devices. For catheter tracking, we used a 2-dimensional (2D) inversion recoveryprepared spoiled gradient echo sequence at a temporal resolution of 7 frames/s. For guidewire tracking, we used 2D steady-state free precession imaging at a temporal resolution of 9 frames/s. Coronary artery catheterization under MRI guidance was successful in 12/12 pigs. Successful coronary catheterization was verified by obtaining MR angiographic images after direct catheter-based injections of dilute Gd.
Conclusions Real-time MRI-guided catheterization of coronary arteries in swine is feasible via a percutaneous femoral artery approach. Selective coronary MR angiography can then be performed with dilute contrast agent injections.
Key Words: magnetic resonance imaging catheterization arteries angiography
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For real-time catheter tracking, we used an 80-cm length 6- or 7-French Judkins coronary catheter (Cook) and a coaxially inserted active guidewire (Intercept, Surgi-Vision). The residual annular lumen of the catheter was filled with 4% gadolinium (Gd) contrast agent (Prohance, Bracco). T1-shortening by the dilute contrast agent allowed direct visualization of the catheter lumen as bright signal.3 The 100-cm long active guidewire, containing a loopless antenna mounted on 0.030-inch diameter nitinol, functioned as an internal radiofrequency (RF) receiver coil.4 The active guidewire significantly increases signal detection within the catheter lumen2 but has a sharp and highly localized sensitivity profile along the length of the guidewire. A rotating hemostatic valve adaptor was attached to the catheter and guidewire to prevent leakage of contrast agent. We tracked the catheter using a 2-dimensional (2D) inversion recovery (IR)prepared fast low angle shot (FLASH) spoiled gradient echo sequence.5 Typical scan parameters were as follows: repetition time (TR)/echo time (TE)/flip angle=2.3 ms/1.15 ms/20°; inversion time (TI)=50 ms; field of view (FOV)=206x300 mm2; acquisition matrix=74x256; slice thickness=30 mm. Using a sliding window technique,6 42 new lines were acquired each acquisition period, yielding effective temporal resolution of 7 frames/s.
For direct guidewire visualization, we used 2D fast imaging with steady-state precession (TrueFISP). This pulse sequence directly detects the nitinol active guidewire as negative susceptibility artifact. However, the internal RF coil enhances guidewire visualization by depicting adjacent surrounding tissues as bright signal. The external phased array coil was used to provide anatomical background. Typical scan parameters were as follows: TR/TE/flip angle=2.9 ms/1.45 ms/70°, FOV=206x300 mm2; matrix=70x128; slice thickness=30 mm. We implemented the same sliding window technique for TrueFISP, but acquired 40 new lines each acquisition period. This yielded effective temporal resolution of 9 frames/s.
To provide vascular roadmaps during catheter movements, we performed catheter-based intraarterial (IA) injections of 4% Gd contrast agent1,7,8 and collected images using the same 2D projection IR-FLASH sequence. We tailored IA injection rate and contrast agent volume to blood vessel caliber.
Under real-time MRI guidance, we advanced the active guidewire and catheter from the femoral artery into the left (n=11) or right (n=1) coronary arteries. Before device movement, we determined three oblique anatomic orientations and locations: sagittal for the aortic arch, coronal for the coronary ostium, and transverse for the proximal coronary arteries. We interactively selected the desired orientation/location based on device position.
Once the coronary ostium was engaged, we performed 2D projection coronary MRA using catheter-based injections of 3 to 16 mL of 4% to 8% Gd. An electrocardiographic-triggered, segmented IR-TrueFISP sequence was used. This coronary MRA was distinguished from roadmap acquisitions because of its longer imaging time (
4 seconds) and submillimeter in-plane spatial resolution (0.9x0.8 mm2).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Coronary catheterization under MRI guidance was successful in 12/12 pigs. Only one coronary artery was catheterized and imaged per animal. During catheterization, the interventionalist viewed device movements on the imaging console adjacent to the MRI scanner. A separate MRI operator controlled imaging parameters as requested by the interventionalist. For catheter tracking, static reference images were placed next to real-time tracking images. During coronary artery manipulations, the internal coil remained within the catheter, with the guidewire tip located immediately proximal to the catheter end-hole. Engagement of the right coronary artery required gentle clockwise rotation of the external portion of the catheter. The operator assessed engagement through visual detection and tactile feedback.
Typical duration to engage the desired coronary artery was approximately 20 minutes. This time period began during MRI-guided insertion of the coronary catheter/guidewire combination through the existing femoral arterial sheath and ended once coronary roadmaps were obtained. No thrombus was detected within the arterial system or associated with the guidewire or catheter.
Vascular roadmaps were obtained using the same IR-FLASH sequence as for catheter tracking, except that the external coil was used instead of the guidewire coil. Higher spatial resolution catheter-based coronary MRA, in any projection, was also feasible. Figure 2 illustrates MR images, along with comparison x-ray angiography. In one pig, follow-up x-ray aortography and coronary angiography after MRI-guided coronary catheterization revealed no vascular injury related to the coil.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Serfaty et al1 first performed 2D projection coronary MRA with injections of dilute Gd. They placed catheters in the coronary arteries under x-ray guidance with carotid access, rather than under MRI guidance and femoral access. Spuentrup et al9 used MRI to guide coronary artery stent placement in swine. In their study, the large metallic signal void of the stent was tracked rather than the catheter itself. Their surgical carotid access made catheterization much easier compared with a femoral artery approach due to the more direct and shorter route to the coronary ostium. Additionally, no catheter-based coronary roadmaps were acquired to verify catheter position. By using percutaneous femoral access and catheter-based injections of contrast agent, we more closely mimicked the clinical setting of x-ray guided coronary catheterization. We also consistently visualized catheter and guidewire movements.
The Gd-filled catheter/active guidewire technique2 used in this study combines several advantages of passive and active catheter tracking. The active guidewire improves signal detection of the Gd-filled catheter lumen. This increased sensitivity detects smaller diameter catheters at higher temporal resolutions than passive tracking methods.3,5,10 Unlike tracking techniques using active catheters,1113 no special catheters are required with this combined approach.
Typical active guidewire tracking approaches have used spoiled gradient echo imaging.4,14 We prefer TrueFISP because it is more sensitive to susceptibility changes in the vicinity of the guidewire and thus allows more consistent depiction of the guidewire itself rather than just the surrounding tissue. The susceptibility effect permitted, rather than interfered with, guidewire visualization.
There were several important limitations to this study. First, we did not provide pathological assessment of potential valvular or vascular injury caused by the procedure. Second, active internal coils cause local tissue heating. However, the guidewire coil used in this study has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for peripheral plaque imaging in humans. We attempted to minimize this heating by using a single internal coil as an active guidewire, rather than using two separate internal coils for separate guidewire and catheter tracking.13 Third, all animals underwent x-ray coronary angiography before MRI-guided coronary catheterization. This approach might have favorably influenced the success of MRI guidance. Finally, the spatial resolution of MRA is still insufficient to visualize stenosis in distal and branch arteries. Potential improvements in signal-to-noise ratio and spatial/temporal resolution are possible with higher imaging fields, intravascular coils, and technical advances such as echo-planar imaging, projection reconstruction, and parallel imaging. An alternative method to define coronary artery disease significance is to measure regional myocardial perfusion using MRI with local contrast injection.
Before clinical applications in humans, additional technical improvements and safety testing will be required. Catheterization of diseased human vessels will take longer and be more difficult than in the normal swine vessels tested in this study. Reductions in procedure time and further improvements in spatial resolution of coronary MRA will be essential before MRI-guided coronary interventions become clinically feasible.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received March 20, 2003; accepted April 9, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Omary R, Green J, Fang W, et al. Use of internal coils for independent and direct MRI-guided endovascular device tracking. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003; 14: 247254.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Unal O, Korosec F, Frayne R, et al. A rapid 2D time-resolved variable-rate k-space sampling MR technique for passive catheter tracking during endovascular procedures. Magn Reson Med. 1998; 40: 356362.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Yang X, Bolster B Jr, Kraitchman D, et al. Intravascular MR-monitored balloon angioplasty: an in vivo feasibility study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1998; 9: 953959.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Green J, Omary R, Finn J, et al. Passive catheter tracking using MRI: comparison of conventional and magnetization-prepared FLASH. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002; 16: 104109.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Riederer S, Tasciyan T, Farzaneh F, et al. MR fluoroscopy: technical feasibility. Magn Reson Med. 1988; 8: 115.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Omary R, Frayne R, Unal O, et al. Intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced 2D and 3D MR angiography: a preliminary study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999; 10: 13151321.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Bos C, Smits H, Bakker C, et al. Selective contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Magn Reson Med. 2000; 44: 575582.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Spuentrup E, Ruebben A, Schaeffter T, et al. Magnetic resonanceguided coronary artery stent placement in a swine model. Circulation. 2002; 105: 874879.
10. Bakker C, Hoogeveen R, Weber J, et al. Visualization of dedicated catheters using fast scanning techniques with potential for MR-guided vascular interventions. Magn Reson Med. 1996; 36: 816820.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Leung D, Debatin J, Wildermuth S, et al. Intravascular MR tracking catheter: preliminary experimental evaluation. Am J Roentgenol. 1995; 164: 12651270.
12. Wildermuth S, Debatin J, Leung D, et al. MR imaging-guided intravascular procedures: initial demonstration in a pig model. Radiology. 1997; 202: 578583.
13. Serfaty J, Yang X, Aksit P, et al. Toward MRI-guided coronary catheterization: visualization of guiding catheters, guidewires, and anatomy in real time. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000; 12: 590594.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Ladd M, Erhard P, Debatin J, et al. Guidewire antennas for MR fluoroscopy. Magn Reson Med. 1997; 37: 891897.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Carlsson, M. Wilson, A. J. Martin, and M. Saeed Myocardial Microinfarction after Coronary Microembolization in Swine: MR Imaging Characterization Radiology, March 1, 2009; 250(3): 703 - 713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Wilensky, H. K. Song, and V. A. Ferrari Role of magnetic resonance and intravascular magnetic resonance in the detection of vulnerable plaques. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 18, 2006; 47(8 Suppl): C48 - C56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Baim and R. Y. Kwong Is Magnetic Resonance Image Guidance the Key to Opening Chronic Total Occlusions? Circulation, February 28, 2006; 113(8): 1053 - 1055. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Omary, J. A. Gehl, B. E. Schirf, J. D. Green, B. Lu, F. S. Pereles, J. Huang, A. C. Larson, and D. Li MR Imaging- versus Conventional X-ray Fluoroscopy-guided Renal Angioplasty in Swine: Prospective Randomized Comparison Radiology, February 1, 2006; 238(2): 489 - 496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Feng, C. L. Dumoulin, S. Dashnaw, R. D. Darrow, R. L. DeLaPaz, P. L. Bishop, and J. Pile-Spellman Feasibility of Stent Placement in Carotid Arteries with Real-time MR Imaging Guidance in Pigs Radiology, February 1, 2005; 234(2): 558 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Feng, C. L. Dumoulin, S. Dashnaw, R. D. Darrow, R. Guhde, R. L. DeLaPaz, P. L. Bishop, and J. Pile-Spellman Transfemoral Catheterization of Carotid Arteries with Real-time MR Imaging Guidance in Pigs Radiology, February 1, 2005; 234(2): 551 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |