Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2003;107:2577-2582
Published online before print May 5, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000070420.51787.A8
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
107/20/2577    most recent
01.CIR.0000070420.51787.A8v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by St John Sutton, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pfeffer, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by St John Sutton, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pfeffer, M. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Remodeling
Right arrow Echocardiography
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2003;107:2577.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Left Ventricular Remodeling and Ventricular Arrhythmias After Myocardial Infarction

Martin St John Sutton, FRCP; Douglas Lee, MD, PhD; Jean Lucien Rouleau, MD; Steven Goldman, MD; Ted Plappert, CVT; Eugene Braunwald, MD; Marc A. Pfeffer, MD, PhD

From Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.P., E.B.); the University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (D.L., J.L.R.); the University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia (M.S.J.S., T.P.); and the University of Arizona, Tucson (S.G.).

Correspondence to Martin St John Sutton, FRCP, Director of Cardiac Imaging Program, Division of Cardiology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Gates Bldg, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104. E-mail suttonm{at}mail.med.upenn.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— The relation between left ventricular (LV) remodeling and ventricular arrhythmias after myocardial infarction is poorly documented. We investigated the relations between LV size, hypertrophy, and function and ventricular arrhythmias in 263 patients from the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) study, using quantitative 2D echocardiography and ambulatory ECG monitoring after myocardial infarction.

Methods and Results— Transthoracic 2D echocardiograms and arrhythmia monitoring were performed at baseline (mean, 11 days) and 1 and 2 years after infarction. LV size, short-axis muscle (mass) area (LVMA), and function were quantified from 2D echocardiograms. The prevalence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and frequent ventricular ectopy (premature ventricular contractions [PVCs] >10/h) was assessed from ambulatory ECG. VT and PVCs >10/h occurred in 20% and 29% of patients at baseline, in 22% and 35% at 1 year and 23% and 39% at 2 years, respectively. VT and PVCs >10/h at baseline and 1 and 2 years were significantly related to LV size, LVMA, and function. Furthermore, changes in LV size and function from baseline to 2 years predicted both VT and PVCs >10/h. The study was underpowered to detect treatment effect of ACE inhibitors and ß-adrenergic receptor blockers but did not alter the relations between ventricular arrhythmias, LV size, and function.

Conclusions— Quantitative echocardiographic assessment of LV size, LVMA, and function and changes in these measurements over time predict ventricular arrhythmias after infarction. Altered LV architecture and function during postinfarction LV remodeling provide an important substrate for triggering high-grade ventricular arrhythmias.


Key Words: remodeling • arrhythmia • myocardial infarction • echocardiography


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Left ventricular (LV) remodeling after myocardial infarction is characterized by progressive dilation, hypertrophy, distortion of cavity shape, and deterioration in contractile function.1–4 Progressive LV dilation results from an imbalance between distending forces and the ability of the extracellular matrix to maintain the tensile strength of the infarct zone.5 Patients with more extensive LV remodeling are at greater risk for cardiovascular fatalities, including sudden death attributable to arrhythmias.6–8 Although ventricular arrhythmias are common in patients with LV dysfunction and congestive heart failure,9,10 the relation between LV remodeling and ventricular arrhythmias after acute myocardial infarction has not been explored systematically.11 Ventricular tachycardia is believed to be due to anisotropic reentry, consequent on slowed impulse propagation velocities through myocardium partially replaced by fibrosis,10,12–14 which typifies postinfarction remodeling myocardium. In addition, activation of plasma neurohormones after infarction15 provides a potential electrophysiological substrate for triggering ventricular arrhythmias.16 ACE inhibitor therapy has been associated with reduced incidence of sudden death after myocardial infarction17,18 and was used in half of this study population. Attenuation of LV remodeling, hypertrophy, and myocardial fibrosis by ACE inhibitor therapy19 may be a plausible mechanism for the reported favorable effect on ventricular arrhythmias after infarction.17,18

See p 2531

The major aim of this study was to examine the relation between LV remodeling, specifically LV dilation, hypertrophy, and function and their changes over time on ventricular arrhythmias in patients after myocardial infarction with LV dysfunction followed up for a minimum of 2 years. A subsidiary aim was to determine whether ACE inhibitor therapy or ß-adrenergic receptor blockade was protective against ventricular arrhythmias.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) trial was a randomized, double-blind study designed to assess the effect of captopril versus placebo on survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction (LV ejection fraction <40%). The echocardiographic substudy consisted of 512 patients. The Holter electrocardiographic substudy was conducted on 564 patients. Two hundred sixty-three patients participated in this prospective, combined echocardiographic and Holter study with evaluations at baseline (11±3 days) and 1 year and 2 years after infarction. The baseline demographics of these 263 patients (mean age, 60±11; 219 men) were representative of the overall SAVE population20 (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Baseline Demographics and Echocardiographic Variables in the Total Study Population and in the Placebo and Captopril Treatment Groups

Two-dimensional echocardiograms of the LV short axis were recorded from the left parasternal region at 3 levels: mitral valve and high and mid papillary muscle levels. The LV long axis was imaged from the apex in the 4-chamber, apical long-axis, and/or apical 2-chamber view. Echocardiographic images were digitized to obtain LV cavity areas at end-diastole and at end-systole. LV size was defined as the sum of the average short-axis and the average long-axis cavity areas at end-diastole and end-systole, as described previously.21 LV function was assessed as the percent change in cavity area from end-diastole to end-systole divided by LV end-diastolic area.21 Epicardial and endocardial borders of the LV short axis images at high papillary muscle level were digitized to obtain LV myocardial areas (LVMA) at end-diastole. We used LVMA because distortion of LV shape and regional variation in wall thickness from myocardial infarction precluded calculation of LV mass, based on algorithms that assumed fixed cavity geometry and uniform wall thickness. These echocardiographic measurements were repeated at 1 and 2 years after infarction.

Twenty-four-hour Holter ambulatory ECG monitoring was recorded at baseline and 1 and 2 years. The mean time between echocardiograms and Holter monitoring was 11.1±3.4 days for the 3 studies. Holter recordings were analyzed with the use of commercially available software for detection of ventricular arrhythmias. Ventricular arrhythmias were defined as >10 premature ventricular contractions per hour (PVCs >10/h) and ventricular tachycardia (VT) as >3 consecutive ventricular contractions with a ventricular rate >100 beats/min.

Statistical Methods
The echocardiographic and arrhythmia assessments were performed in a double-blinded manner. We assessed the relations between ventricular arrhythmias (PVCs >10/h and VT) and echocardiographic measurements of LV size at end-diastole and end-systole, LVMA, and percent change in cavity area using logistic regression analysis for the whole study population and for the two treatment groups at baseline and 1 and 2 years after infarction. We illustrated these relations by dividing the study population into quintiles for each echocardiographic measurement. Logistic regression analysis was also used to assess the relation between ventricular arrhythmias (VT, PVCs) as the outcome variables and change in LV size, mass, and function from baseline to 1 and 2 years as the predictor variables.

The multivariate analysis included all risk factors with probability values of P<0.15 in a backward stepwise logistic regression model. To determine the potential mechanism by which ACE inhibitor therapy or ß-adrenergic receptor blockers affect ventricular arrhythmias, the interaction between risk factors and ACE inhibitor therapy with captopril was included in the model. The fit of the final model was assessed by the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic.22 All tests were 2-sided, and probability values <0.05 were considered significant. All analyses were performed with the use of SAS software, release 6.12 (SAS Institute Inc).


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Demographics
Baseline demographics including sex, history of previous infarction, hypertension, diabetes, ejection fraction by radionuclide ventriculography, use of thrombolytic therapy, ß-adrenergic receptor blockers, and antiarrhythmic agents and echocardiographic measurements of LV size, LVMA, and function were similar in the treatment groups and representative of the SAVE population (Table 1).

Prevalence of Ventricular Arrhythmias
PVCs >10/h occurred in 76 of 263 (29%) patients at baseline, 73 of 211 (35%) patients at 1 year, and 72 of 183 (39%) patients at 2 years (P=0.067). VT occurred in 53 of 263 (20%) patients at baseline, 46 of 211 (22%) at 1 year, and 42 of 183 (23%) at 2 years (P=0.228).

LV Size and Ventricular Arrhythmias
There were significant relations between LV end-diastolic size and PVCs >10/h (P<0.0001) at baseline and between LV end-systolic size and PVCs >10/h at baseline (P<0.0001). Relations between LV size and PVCs>10/h were also demonstrated at 1 year (P=0.0012; P=0.0002) and 2 years after infarction (P=0.0002; P<0.0001), respectively. When the population was divided into quintiles by end-diastolic or end-systolic LV size, the prevalence of PVCs >10/h increased progressively from quintile 1 through 5 at baseline (Figure 1) and at 1 and 2 years after infarction (Figure 1).



View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Relation between LV end-diastolic size and PVCs >10/h at A, baseline (BL); B, 1 year (Y1); and C, 2 years (Y2) and relation between LV end-systolic size and PVCs >10/h at baseline (D), 1 year (E), and 2 years (F).

There were significant relations between LV end-diastolic size and VT (P=0.013) and between LV end-systolic size and VT (P=0.0017) at baseline and at 1 year (P=0.0002; P<0.0001) and 2 years (P<0.0001; P<0.0001) after infarction. Quintile analysis demonstrated that the prevalence of VT increased with end-diastolic and end-systolic LV size at all time points.

LVMA and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Significant relations were demonstrated between LVMA and PVCs >10/h at baseline (P<0.0001) and 1 year (P=0.0023) and 2 years (P=0.038). Similar relations were demonstrated between LVMA and VT at baseline (P=0.0011) and 1 year (P=0.0030) and 2 years (P=0.0468) after infarction. When the patient cohort was divided into quintiles, PVCs >10/h and VT both increased progressively with LVMA after infarction (Figure 3).



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Relation between LVMA and PVCs >10/h at baseline (A), 1 year (B), and 2 years (C) and relation between LVMA and VT at baseline (D), 1 year (E), and 2 years (F).

LV Function and Ventricular Arrhythmias
LV function (% change in cavity area) was inversely related to PVCs >10/h (P<0.0001) and VT (P<0.0001) at baseline and at 1 year (both P<0.0001) and 2 years (both P<0.0001). When the study population was divided into quintiles by percent change in cavity area, the prevalence of PVCs >10/h and VT increased progressively with decreasing LV function at all time points after infarction (Figure 4).



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Relation between percent change in LV cavity area and PVCs >10/h at baseline (A), 1 year (B), and 2 years (C) and relation between percent change in LV cavity area and VT at baseline at baseline (D), 1 year (E), and 2 years (F).

Multivariate Analysis of LV Size, Function, and Ventricular Arrhythmias
When the echocardiographic measurements were considered together in a multivariate analysis, LV function (% change in cavity area) was most closely associated with PVCs >10/h and VT (both P<0.001 at baseline and at 1 and 2 years) (Table 2). LVMA was closely associated with PVCs >10/h and VT at baseline (P<0.001; P=0.02) and at 1 year (P=0.03), whereas LV size was related to VT at 2 years after infarction (P<0.001) (Table 2). Adjusted odds ratios for variables significant on multivariate analysis are shown per 5-U increment for each measure (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Multivariate Predictors of PVCs >10/h and VT: Percent Change in LV Area, LVMA, and LV Diastolic Cavity Area as Odds Ratios With 95% Confidence Intervals

Effect of Changes in LV Size and Function on Ventricular Arrhythmias
There were significantly larger increases in both LV systolic and diastolic cavity areas in patients with increased frequency of PVCs >10/h at 2 years than in those without PVCs (P<0.05) (Table 3). Similarly, patients with VT at 2 years had larger increases in systolic and diastolic cavity areas compared with patients without VT (both P<0.0001), and they had greater reduction in LV function (% change in LV area; P<0.001) (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Relations Between Changes in LV Size, Mass, and Function From Baseline to 2 Years and Prevalence of PVCs >10/h and VT

Effect of ACE Inhibitor Therapy and ß-Blockers on Ventricular Arrhythmias
There was no evidence that ACE inhibitor therapy reduced ventricular ectopy or VT, although the power to detect an effect on VT at 1 year was only 50%. The prevalence of (PVCs >10/h) in patients treated with ACE inhibitor therapy was similar to placebo at baseline (24% versus 34%, P=0.067), at 1 year (31% versus 38%, P=0.33), and at 2 years (45% versus 34%, P=0.129). The prevalence of VT in the captopril-treated group was not different from the placebo group (17% versus 23%, P=0.218, at baseline; 17% versus 27%, P=0.064, at 1 year; and 19% versus 27%, P=0.209, at 2 years after infarction).

Antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) use at random assignment was not different between the placebo and captopril groups (10/129 versus 16/134; P=0.255). There were 5 cardiovascular deaths in the AAD and 31 deaths in the non-AAD groups (19.2% versus 13.1%; P=0.39). The use of AADs did not affect the relations between VT and LV size or function or between PVCs and LV size or function.

Thirty-seven percent of patients were taking ß-adrenergic receptor blockers. With the use of the Cochran-Armitage trend test (P=0.528), there was no difference between the proportion of patients taking ß-blockers across the quintiles. Adjusting for baseline use of ß-blocker therapy did not modify the prevalence of PVCs or VT.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
LV remodeling is associated with cavity dilation in approximately one third to one half of survivors of acute myocardial infarction with contractile dysfunction.19 Progressive LV dilation increases systolic and diastolic wall stresses, which activate cell surface mechanoreceptors that initiate intracellular signaling for myocyte hypertrophy and modulate the activity of matrix metalloproteinases, neurohormones, and local tropic factors.23–25 The extent of LV dilation after myocardial infarction is an important determinant of risk for major adverse cardiovascular events including ventricular arrhythmias, heart failure, and death.19,21

Ventricular arrhythmias were frequent after infarction. VT occurred in 20% to 23% between baseline and 2 years. PVCs >10/h increased from 29% at baseline to 39% at 2 years. We demonstrated significant relations between LV end-diastolic and end-systolic size and VT and between LV size and PVCs >10/h early after infarction. Similar relations were present at 1 year and at 2 years after infarction. Division of the study population into quintiles by LV end-diastolic and end-systolic size showed a stepwise increase both in VT and PVCs >10/h with increasing LV size up to 2 years after infarction (Figures 1 and 2Down). The important predictive value of echocardiographic measurements of LV size in patients after infarction has been reported for heart failure and recurrent infarction19,21 but not for ventricular arrhythmias.



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Relation between LV end-diastolic size and VT at baseline (A), 1 year (B), and 2 years (C) and relation between LV end-systolic size and VT at baseline (D), 1 year (E), and 2 years (F).

Ventricular tachycardia is believed to be due to anisotropic reentry, consequent on slowed impulse propagation velocities through myocardium partially replaced by fibrosis.10,12–14 The abnormal variability in impulse velocity and potential substrate for reentrant circuits may be facilitated in hearts undergoing progressive dilation in which there is dynamic imbalance between distending forces and the stretch-resistant extracellular collagen scaffold during postinfarction LV remodeling. This propensity may be amplified by elevated plasma levels of adrenergic neurohormones after infarction.26

We demonstrated significant relations between LVMA, which we used as a surrogate for LV mass, and VT and between LVMA and frequent ventricular ectopy in the early postinfarction period. Similarly, relations between LVMA, VT, and frequent ectopy (PVCs >10/h) were present at 1 year and 2 years after infarction. In addition, there was a greater preponderance of ventricular arrhythmias in those with the largest LV mass. The relation between increased LV mass, ventricular ectopy, and adverse cardiovascular events was recognized initially in the Framingham study.27 Subsequently, LV hypertrophy caused by aortic stenosis, hypertension, and obstructive cardiomyopathy has been associated with ventricular arrhythmias.28,29 The mechanism for ventricular arrhythmias associated with increased LV mass is complex, but important etiologic factors include the combination of patchy subendocardial fibrosis, increased calcium-dependent slow inward current, altered kinetics of the outward potassium current, and altered repolarization time of hypertrophied myocardium.30–32

There were significant inverse relations between LV function (% change in LV cavity area) and VT and between LV function and PVCs >10/h in the early postinfarction period and at 1- and 2-year follow-up. The majority of ventricular arrhythmias occurred in patients in the lowest quintile for percent change in cavity area, with the most severe LV dysfunction at each time point studied. In patients with heart failure, ventricular arrhythmias are a common mode of death and predominate in patients with the most severe LV systolic dysfunction.9 Multivariate analysis identified LV function as the echocardiographic parameter most closely associated with ventricular arrhythmias.

There was a significantly greater increase in systolic and diastolic LV size from baseline to 2 years in patients with increased frequency of PVCs >10/h at 2 years. In addition, patients with VT had significantly larger increases in LV systolic and diastolic cavity areas from baseline to 2 years compared with patients with no VT. Furthermore, there was a greater reduction in LV function (% change in LV area) in patients who had VT at 2 years (Table 3). Thus, the presence of ventricular arrhythmias was associated with progressive LV dilation and deteriorating function during postinfarction remodeling.

In this study, ACE inhibitor therapy did not have a detectable impact on the incidence of VT or PVCs >10/h compared with placebo, concordant with several previous studies.20,33 This was not explained by any difference in use of antiarrhythmic agents among the treatment groups but probably reflected the small size of our patient cohort, which had only 50% power to detect an effect on VT at 1 year. A meta-analysis of several large postinfarction trials was required before a significant benefit of ACE inhibitor therapy on sudden arrhythmic death was demonstrated.17 Similarly, therapy with ß-adrenergic receptor blockers, used in more than one third of our patients, had no significant effect on the prevalence of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular ectopic activity. However, since both of these agents have been shown to attenuate LV hypertrophy and remodeling, this favorable modification of ventricular structure and function may in the long term reduce the propensity for ventricular arrhythmias.

One potential limitation of our study is the absence of information describing the effect of LV shape on ventricular arrhythmias during postinfarction remodeling. Although LV size and function can be quantified in ventricles with abnormal regional wall motion, there is no consensus regarding the optimal descriptor of LV cavity shape. The most frequently used shape index, the ratio of LV short axis and long axis, is not representative of distorted postinfarction ventricles.

Our study, using serial quantitative echocardiography and ambulatory ECG monitoring, demonstrates striking relations between LV topography, function, and ventricular arrhythmias during ventricular remodeling for up to 2 years after infarction. This analysis of the long-term consequences of remodeling and arrhythmias cannot exclude survivor bias. In our prior work, patients undergoing the greatest remodeling are more likely to be nonsurvivors.19 However, we have constructed our data relating LV structure and function and changes therein to the propensity for arrhythmias at baseline and 1 year and 2 years and have found consistent relations in each evaluation. This study provides quantitative support for the concept that postinfarction LV remodeling is an important substrate for triggering ventricular arrhythmias.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by a grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.


*    Footnotes
 
Dr Pfeffer receives honoraria and/or educational research grants or serves as a consultant for Bristol-Myers Squibb. The Brigham and Women’s Hospital has been awarded a patent regarding the use of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system in selected survivors of myocardial infarction. Dr Pfeffer is among the co-inventors. The licensing agreement with Abbott and Novartis is not linked to sales.

Received January 16, 2003; accepted February 25, 2003.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Kostuk WJ, Kazamias TM, Gander MP, et al. Left ventricular size after acute myocardial infarction: serial changes and their prognostic significance. Circulation. 1973; 47: 1174–1179.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Erlebacher JA, Weiss JL, Weisfeldt ML, et al. Early dilation of the infarcted segment in acute transmural myocardial infarction: role of infarct expansion in acute left ventricular enlargement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984; 4: 201–208.[Abstract]
  3. Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E. Ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: experimental observations and clinical implications. Circulation. 1990; 81: 1161–1172.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Gaudron P, Eilles C, Kugler I, et al. Progressive left ventricular dysfunction and remodeling after myocardial infarction: potential mechanisms and early predictors. Circulation. 1993; 87: 755–763.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Rohde LE, Aikawa M, Cheng GC, et al. Echocardiography-derived end-systolic regional wall stress and matrix remodeling after experimental myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 33: 835–842.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. White HD, Norris RM, Brown MA, et al. Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1987; 76: 44–51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Gettes LS, Cascio WE, Sanders WE. Mechanisms of sudden cardiac death. In: Zipes DP, Jalife J, eds. Cardiac Electrophysiology: From Cell to Bedside. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1995: 527–538.
  8. Moss AJ, Zareiba W, Hall WJ, et al, for the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II Investigators. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 877–883.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Bigger JT, Fleiss JL, Kleiger R, et al, and the Multicenter Post-Infarction Research Group. The relationships among ventricular arrhythmias, left ventricular dysfunction, and mortality in the 2 years after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1984; 69: 250–258.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Dillon SM, Allessie MA, Ursell PC, et al. Influences of anisotropic tissue structure on reentrant circuits in the epicardial border zone of subacute canine infarcts. Circ Res. 1988; 63: 182–206.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Dambrink JH, Beukema WP, Van Gilst WH, et al. Left ventricular dilatation and high-grade ventricular arrhythmias in the first year after myocardial infarction: CATS Investigators Captopril and Thrombolysis Study. J Card Fail. 1994; 1: 3–11.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Pogwizd SM, Hoyt RH, Saffitz JE, et al. Reentrant and focal mechanisms underlying ventricular tachycardia in the human heart. Circulation. 1992; 86: 1872–1887.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Richards DA, Blake GJ, Spear JF, et al. Electrophysiologic substrate for ventricular tachycardia: correlation of properties in vivo and in vitro. Circulation. 1984; 69: 369–381.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Cardinal R, Vermeulen M, Shenassa M, et al. Anisotropic conduction and functional dissociation of ischemic tissue during reentrant ventricular tachycardia in canine myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1988; 77: 1162–1176.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Rouleau JL, de Champlain J, Klein M, et al. Activation of neurohumoral systems in post-infarction left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 22: 390–398.[Abstract]
  16. Corr PB, Yamada KA, Witkowski FX. Mechanisms controlling cardiac autonomic function and their relationship to arrhythmogenesis. In: Fozzard HA, Haber E, Jennings RB, et al, eds. The Heart and Cardiovascular System: Scientific Foundations. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1986.
  17. Domanski MJ, Exner DV, Borkowf CB, et al. Effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition on sudden cardiac death in patients following acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 33: 598–604.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Tuininga YS, Wiesfeld ACP, van Veldhuisen DJ, et al. Electrophysiological changes of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition after myocardial infarction. J Card Fail. 2000; 6: 77–79.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. St John Sutton M, Pfeffer MA, Moye L, et al, for the SAVE Investigators. Cardiovascular death and left ventricular remodeling two years after myocardial infarction: baseline predictors and impact of long-term use of captopril: information from the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) Trial. Circulation. 1997; 96: 3294–3299.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E, Moyé LA, et al. Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction: results of the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Trial. N Engl J Med. 1992; 327: 669–677.[Abstract]
  21. St John Sutton M, Pfeffer MA, Plappert T, et al, for the SAVE Investigators. Quantitative two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements are major predictors of adverse cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction: the protective effects of captopril. Circulation. 1994; 89: 68–75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York, NY: Wiley; 1989: 140–145.
  23. Sadoshima J, Jahn L, Takahashi T, et al. Molecular characterization of the stretch-induced adaptation of cultured cardiac cells: an in vitro model of load-induced cardiac hypertrophy. J Biol Chem. 1992; 267: 10551–10560.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Tyagi SC, Campbell SE, Reddy HK, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase activity expression in infarcted, non-infarcted and dilated cardiomyopathic human hearts. Mol Cell Biochem. 1996; 155: 13–21.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Weber KT. Extracellular matrix remodeling in heart failure: a role for de novo angiotensin II generation. Circulation. 1997; 96: 4065–4082.[Free Full Text]
  26. Nguyen T, Salibi EE, Rouleau JL. Postinfarction survival and inducibility of ventricular arrhythmias in the spontaneously hypertensive rat: effects of ramipril and hydralazine. Circulation. 1998; 98: 2074–2080.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Levy D, Anderson KM, Savage DD, et al. Risk of ventricular arrhythmias in left ventricular hypertrophy: the Framingham Heart Study. Am J Cardiol. 1987; 60: 560–565.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Klein R. Ventricular arrhythmias in aortic valve disease: analysis of 102 patients. Am J Cardiol. 1984; 53: 1079–1083.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Maron BJ, Fananapazir L. Sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1992; 85 (suppl I): I-57–I-63.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Aronson RS. Mechanisms of arrhythmias in ventricular hypertrophy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1991; 21: 729–739.
  31. Kleinman RB, Houser SR. Calcium currents in normal and hypertrophied isolated feline ventricular myocytes. Am J Physiol. 1988; 255: H1434–H1442.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Kleinman RB, Houser SR. Outward currents in normal and hypertrophied feline ventricular myocytes. Am J Physiol. 1989; 256: H1450–H1461.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. SOLVD Investigators. Effect of enalapril on mortality and the development of heart failure in asymptomatic patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions. N Engl J Med. 1992; 327: 685–691.[Abstract]

Related Article:

Less Heart Is More
Douglas P. Zipes
Circulation 2003 107: 2531-2532. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
E Wu, J T Ortiz, P Tejedor, D C Lee, C Bucciarelli-Ducci, P Kansal, J C Carr, T A Holly, D Lloyd-Jones, F J Klocke, et al.
Infarct size by contrast enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance is a stronger predictor of outcomes than left ventricular ejection fraction or end-systolic volume index: prospective cohort study
Heart, June 1, 2008; 94(6): 730 - 736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. St John Sutton
Quest for Diastolic Prognostic Indicators of Clinical Outcome After Acute Myocardial Infarction
Circulation, May 20, 2008; 117(20): 2570 - 2572.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
C. L. del Rio, P. I. McConnell, M. Kukielka, R. Dzwonczyk, B. D. Clymer, M. B. Howie, and G. E. Billman
Electrotonic remodeling following myocardial infarction in dogs susceptible and resistant to sudden cardiac death
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2008; 104(2): 386 - 393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. A. Pfeffer and E. D. Frohlich
Improvements in clinical outcomes with the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: cross-fertilization between clinical and basic investigation
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): H2021 - H2025.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. P. Hudson, P. W. Armstrong, W. Ruzyllo, J. Brum, L. Cusmano, P. Krzeski, R. Lyon, M. Quinones, P. Theroux, D. Sydlowski, et al.
Effects of Selective Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitor (PG-116800) to Prevent Ventricular Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction: Results of the PREMIER (Prevention of Myocardial Infarction Early Remodeling) Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 4, 2006; 48(1): 15 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
S. H. Hohnloser
Ventricular Arrhythmias: Antiadrenergic Therapy for the Patient with Coronary Artery Disease
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, October 1, 2005; 10(4_suppl): S23 - S31.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. U. Klein and S. Reek
"The Older the Broader": Electrogram Characteristics Help Identify the Critical Isthmus During Catheter Ablation of Postinfarct Ventricular Tachycardia
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 16, 2005; 46(4): 675 - 677.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
Authors/Task Force Members, K. Swedberg, Writing Committee:, J. Cleland, H. Dargie, H. Drexler, F. Follath, M. Komajda, L. Tavazzi, O. A. Smiseth, et al.
Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure: executive summary (update 2005): The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology
Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2005; 26(11): 1115 - 1140.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. A. Grayburn, C. P. Appleton, A. N. DeMaria, B. Greenberg, B. Lowes, J. Oh, J. F. Plehn, P. Rahko, M. St. John Sutton, E. J. Eichhorn, et al.
Echocardiographic predictors of morbidity and mortality in patients with advanced heart failure: The Beta-blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial (BEST)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 5, 2005; 45(7): 1064 - 1071.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. D. Solomon, D. Wang, P. Finn, H. Skali, L. Zornoff, J. J.V. McMurray, K. Swedberg, S. Yusuf, C. B. Granger, E. L. Michelson, et al.
Effect of Candesartan on Cause-Specific Mortality in Heart Failure Patients: The Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) Program
Circulation, October 12, 2004; 110(15): 2180 - 2183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Nerheim, S. Birger-Botkin, L. Piracha, and B. Olshansky
Heart Failure and Sudden Death in Patients With Tachycardia-Induced Cardiomyopathy and Recurrent Tachycardia
Circulation, July 20, 2004; 110(3): 247 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
T. Hole, C. Hall, and T. Skjaerpe
N-terminal proatrial natriuretic peptide predicts two-year remodelling in patients with acute transmural myocardial infarction
Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2004; 25(5): 416 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. P. Zipes
Less Heart Is More
Circulation, May 27, 2003; 107(20): 2531 - 2532.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
107/20/2577    most recent
01.CIR.0000070420.51787.A8v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by St John Sutton, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pfeffer, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by St John Sutton, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pfeffer, M. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Remodeling
Right arrow Echocardiography
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs
Right arrowRelated Article