Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2003;107:1729-1732
Published online before print March 31, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000064894.97094.4F
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
107/13/1729    most recent
01.CIR.0000064894.97094.4Fv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wu, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Boerwinkle, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wu, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Boerwinkle, E.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute coronary syndromes
Right arrow Epidemiology

(Circulation. 2003;107:1729.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Interaction Between Soluble Thrombomodulin and Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 in Predicting Risk of Coronary Heart Disease

Kenneth K. Wu, MD, PhD; Nena Aleksic, PhD; Christie M. Ballantyne, MD; Chul Ahn, PhD; Harinder Juneja, MD; Eric Boerwinkle, PhD

From the Vascular Biology Research Center and Department of Internal Medicine (K.K.W., N.A., C.A., H.J.), Human Genetics Center (E.B.) University of Texas-Houston Health Science Center, and Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (C.M.B.), Houston, Tex.

Correspondence to Kenneth K. Wu, MD, PhD, Division of Hematology, University of Texas-Houston Medical School, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 5.016, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail Kenneth.K.Wu{at}uth.tmc.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Results from previous ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) analyses indicate that soluble intercellular adhesive molecule-1 (sICAM) and soluble thrombomodulin (sTM) levels are associated with risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in an opposite direction. A high sICAM level increases the risk of CHD, whereas a high level of sTM has a lower risk of CHD. It was unclear whether there was an interaction between sTM and sICAM.

Methods and Results— Using a nested case-cohort design, we measured sTM and sICAM in 317 incident CHD cases and 726 non-cases from the ARIC participants. Consistent with our previous reports, sICAM values in the upper versus the lower tertile increased the risk of CHD event by {approx}2-fold (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46 to 2.87) whereas sTM values in the lower versus the upper tertile increased CHD risk by {approx}4-fold (95% CI, 2.80 to 5.74). Interaction between these 2 parameters was determined by weighted Cox proportional hazard regression. A significant interaction (P=0.038) was noted. Combinatorial analysis shows a significant increase in CHD risk ratio (RR) (4.66, 95% CI, 1.89 to 11.46) of the lower sTM/upper sICAM group versus the upper sTM/lower sICAM group. Individuals whose sTM values were in the upper tertile had a RR below 1, even when sICAM were in the upper tertile. The RR of lower tertile sTM was increased by sICAM in a tertile-dependent manner.

Conclusion— Weighted Cox proportional hazard analysis shows a significant interaction between sTM and sICAM in predicting risk of CHD event. Combinatorial analysis reveals that an upper tertile sICAM had a significant increase in the risk of a CHD event only when sTM was in the lower tertile.


Key Words: glycoproteins • cell adhesion molecules • coronary disease • risk factors


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Vascular endothelium separates the subendothelial tissue from blood constituents and maintains vascular integrity and vascular tone by expressing vasoprotective and thromboresistant molecules. Thrombomodulin (TM) is one of the important vasoprotective molecules.1 It is a transmembrane protein expressed constitutively primarily in endothelial cells. It has a large extracellular region comprising a thrombin binding site.2,3 On binding to this site, thrombin alters its conformation and becomes active in converting protein C to activated protein C. Activated protein C digests activated coagulation factor V and VIII, thereby reducing the prothrombotic activity.1–3 TM-bound thrombin is internalized and degraded in endothelial cells. Thus, TM possesses several properties to protect arterial walls and reduce thrombotic tendency. The extracellular region of TM is cleaved constitutively into several fragments collectively called soluble TM (sTM). We have recently shown in a prospective follow-up of ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) healthy participants that individuals whose sTM levels are in the highest quintile have a significant reduction in risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) when compared with those in the lowest quintile.4 These results suggest that the sTM level in healthy subjects may reflect the level of intact TM expression on endothelial cells and that a high TM level is protective against coronary thrombosis. In contrast, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) is expressed on endothelial surface after inflammatory stimulation, and the extracellular region of ICAM-1 is cleaved which circulates as soluble ICAM-1 (sICAM).5 sICAM is considered as an important marker of inflammation. Results from the ARIC prospective study have shown that individuals whose sICAM levels are in the highest quartile have significantly increased CHD risk when compared with those in the lowest quartile.6

Thus, a high level of sTM signifies protection and has a lower risk of CHD, whereas a high sICAM level signifies an inflammatory state and increases risk of CHD. We postulated that sTM interacts with sICAM in predicting CHD risk. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the risk ratio of sTM and sICAM in ARIC CHD cases and random reference cohort by a combinatorial approach.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Study Population
The ARIC study recruited a population-based cohort of men and women 45 to 64 years of age from 4 US communities in 1987 through 1989.7 A total of 15 792 participants completed a home interview and clinic examination. The participants were re-examined on a 3-year cycle; 93% of the initial cohort were re-examined in 1990 to 1992, 86% in 1993 to 1995, and 80% in 1996 to 1998 by identical procedures. These participants have been prospectively followed for development of CHD and other vascular events since enrollment. ARIC followed the cohort and ascertained CHD events using standardized methods described previously.8 We defined CHD incidence as (1) a definite or probable myocardial infarction (MI); (2) a silent MI; (3) definite CHD death; or (4) a coronary revascularization.9 A random sample of the entire cohort was selected to serve as reference by a procedure previously described.10 Participants were excluded if they were neither white nor black, had prevalent CHD at baseline, or had a history of stroke or transient ischemic attacks. For the present study, we included CHD events that occurred between the initial visit (1987 to 1989) and December 31, 1996. The mean follow-up period was 7.9 years. The proportion of the entire cohort lost to follow-up was 13.1%. After exclusions, the final sample contained 317 CHD cases and a reference cohort of 770, 44 of whom were also cases. After subtracting cases from the reference cohort, there were 726 random cohort samples that were designated as non-cases. Blood samples for sTM and sICAM measurements were collected during the first visit (1987 to 1989) before onset of CHD events.

Baseline Measurements
Blood pressure, anthropometry, carotid sonography, cigarette smoking, and other lifestyle parameters were determined during the first visit (1987 to 1989) by standardized procedures described previously.10 Venous blood was collected during the first visit according to standardized venipuncture and processing procedures.11 The processed plasma and serum samples were stored at -80°C until assay. sTM and sICAM levels in plasma were measured by enzyme immunoassays as described previously.4,6 Other coagulation and lipid parameters were measured by standardized methods, which have been described previously.10 The laboratory intra-assay coefficients of variation (CV) for sTM and sICAM were 6.0% and 4.4%, respectively, and the inter-assay CVs were 8.2% and 7.4%, respectively.

Data Analysis
We used a case-cohort design for this analysis.12,13 Plasma sTM and sICAM were determined in all 317 incident CHD cases and 726 non-cases. We defined 8 strata for sampling the cohort, as previously described.10 To account for the stratified sampling design in analyses, we weighted each observation with each stratum by the inverse of sampling fraction for that stratum, thereby recreating the original frequency distribution of the strata in the entire cohort. We first used ANCOVA to compute age-, race-, and sex-adjusted mean levels of sICAM and sTM for CHD cases and non-cases after appropriate weighting for the stratified sampling design. We also used ANCOVA to compute age-, race-, and sex-adjusted mean or percentage values of study variables according to the upper and lower tertiles of sTM and sICAM in the cohort sample after appropriate weighting for the stratified sampling design. We computed the risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the time to the development of CHD in relation to sTM and sICAM using a weighted proportional hazard regression previously described by Barlow.13 We examined if there was a significant interaction between sTM and sICAM by weighted Cox proportional hazard regression. We trichotomized the sTM and sICAM levels to determine the risk ratios of upper tertile sTM/lower tertile sICAM (u T/l I) versus 8 other groups: u T/u I, u T/middle tertile sICAM (m I), m T/u I, m T/m I, m T/l I, l T/u I, l T/m I and l T/l I. We examined if the baseline characteristics were significantly different between the reference and 8 comparison groups by using Bonferroni correction to adjust for the effect of multiple-group comparisons. A probability value less than 0.0062 (=0.05/8) was considered significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The age-, race-, and sex-adjusted mean value of sICAM was significantly higher in cases than in non-cases (279 versus 239 ng/mL, P<0.0001). The adjusted mean value of sTM was lower in cases than in non-cases, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (37.6 versus 41.5 ng/mL, P=0.068). These results are consistent with our earlier analysis of a smaller number of cases.4,6 We next analyzed the relative CHD risk of upper versus lower tertile sICAM or lower versus upper tertile sTM individually with adjustment made for age, sex, race, and conventional cardiovascular risk factors. The risk ratio of a CHD event for participants whose sICAM values were at the upper tertile was 2-fold higher than those whose sICAM values were at the lower tertile (Table 1). By contrast, participants whose sTM values were at the lower tertile had a 4-fold higher increased risk of CHD than those whose sTM values were at the upper tertile (Table 1). These results revealed an association of these 2 endothelial cell markers with CHD risk in opposite direction and suggested a potential interaction between them. Weighted Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed a significant interaction between sTM and sICAM in influencing risk of CHD (P=0.038). To characterize this interaction, we analyzed the risk ratio according to combined sTM and sICAM tertiles. There are 9 groups as shown in Table 2. Group 1 (u T/l I) was chosen as the reference group as theoretically it has the lowest risk. Number of subjects, age, race, sex, and conventional risk factor profile of each group are shown in Table 2. When compared with the reference group, group 7 (l T/l I) was significantly younger; group 2 (u T/m I) and group 3 (u T/u I) had a significantly lower percentage of blacks; group 7 has a lower percentage of men; group 6 (m T/u I) and group 9 (l T/u I) had a significantly higher level of cigarette smoking per year; group 7 and group 8 (l T/m I) had a significantly lower fibrinogen level; and group 6 (m T/u I) had a significantly higher white blood cell (WBC) count (Table 2). These differences were taken into consideration when we analyzed the risk ratio of CHD events for each group.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Analysis of Relative Risk of CHD in Subjects at the Upper Versus the Lower Tertile of sICAM or at the Lower vs the Upper Tertile of sTM


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Characteristics of 9 Groups of Subjects Based on sTM and sICAM-1 Tertiles

After adjusting for age, sex, race, and several conventional risk factors (total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, triglyceride, systolic blood pressure, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cigarette smoking, fibrinogen, and WBC), the risk ratio (RR) for the time to develop a CHD event of the l T/u I group was significantly higher (RR=4.66, 95% CI, 1.89, 11.46), whereas the RR of the u T/m I group was significantly lower (RR=0.37, 95% CI, 0.14, 0.95) than that of the reference group (u T/l I). The RR of the u T/u I group was also below 1, but the difference was not statistically significant (Figure 1). The 3 groups with sTM values at the lower tertile exhibited a graded increase in RR according to the tertile of sICAM: 4.66 for the l T/u I, 2.5 for the l T/m I, and 1.39 for the l T/l I group (Figure 1). The 3 groups with sICAM values at the upper tertile also exhibited a sTM tertile-dependent increase in RR. The RR of the m T/u I group (2.35) was between that of l T/u I and u T/u I (Figure 1). The remaining 2 groups (m T/l I and m T/m I) had a RR less than 1 which, however, was not significantly different from the reference.



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Weighted Cox proportional hazard analysis of risk ratios of participants with various combinations of sTM and sICAM tertiles versus those with upper tertile sTM/lower tertile sICAM (reference group). Adjustment was made for age, sex, race, and cardiovascular risk factors listed in Table 2. Values in parentheses are 95% confidence limits. *P=0.039 indicates a statistically significant reduction in CHD risk ratio (RR=0.37) of the upper sTM/middle sICAM group versus the reference (upper sTM/lower sICAM) group. **P=0.0008 indicates a significant increase in risk ratio (RR=4.66) of the lower sTM/upper sICAM group versus the reference group.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
A major finding of this study is that there is a significant interaction between sTM and sICAM in predicting the risk of a CHD event in middle-aged men and women. By a combinatorial analysis, our results provide new information regarding the CHD risk assessment using these 2 soluble endothelial markers. Association of these 2 markers with CHD risk is greatly influenced by the sTM values. sTM in the upper tertile significantly reduces the risk of a CHD event even in the presence of sICAM in the upper tertile. As shown in the Figure, the RRs of the u T/u I and u T/m I groups were below 1, and for reasons unclear at the present time, the RR of u T/m I was significantly lower than that of the reference group (u T/l I). Risk assessment by sICAM analysis alone would have labeled the u T/u I group as having a 2-fold increase in CHD risk. In fact, a high sICAM value is associated with an increased CHD risk only when the sTM value is low. Interestingly, sTM and sICAM exert a dose-dependent effect on the risk ratio. The tertile-dependent response was most apparent in the 3 groups with sTM values in the lower tertile; the RRs for the l T/l I, l T/m I, and l T/u I groups were 1.39, 2.50, and 4.66, respectively. Three groups with sICAM values in the upper tertile also exhibited a tertile-related effect; the RR for the u T/u I, m T/u I, and l T/u I groups were 0.78, 2.35, and 4.66, respectively. Taken together, these results support the proposal that sTM may reflect the level of endothelial TM, and a high TM level may protect vascular wall from inflammatory insults. Recent experimental data have provided evidence for an antiinflammatory action of TM.14

The plasma level of sTM in healthy ARIC participants could be influenced by the level of endothelial TM expression, the rate of its basal cleavage, and changes in TM expression and cleavage caused by subclinical inflammation. Inflammation has been recognized as a major component in the pathophysiology of atherothrombosis, and inflammatory markers are associated with an increased risk of CHD.15,16 Proinflammatory mediators have been reported to suppress endothelial TM expression and thus may reduce the level of sTM.17,18 On the other hand, proinflammatory mediators induce ICAM-1 expression, increase cleavage of ICAM-1, and increase sICAM levels.19,20 Thus, a high sICAM and a low sTM level could represent a highly active inflammatory state and would be anticipated to have a high risk of CHD events. Our data support the role of inflammation in unstable plaque and the consequent plaque rupture and thrombosis.21

Results from our study open a new avenue for assessing risk of CHD. Conventional risk assessment by biochemical markers tends to evaluate the risk ratio of a single marker and, in the case of multiple markers, tends to be random without a clear pathophysiological basis. Our results show that the CHD risk may be more clearly defined by coupling two markers with opposite pathophysiological indications than by each individual marker. Because the occurrence of an arterial thrombotic event is determined by a balance between prothrombotic and antithrombotic factors, the combinatorial analysis may be extended to include additional factors. For example, results from ARIC studies have shown an association of several procoagulant factors and fibrinolytic factors with the risk of CHD events.10,22 We have carried out a preliminary combinatorial analysis to determine the interaction of sTM with prothrombotic factors, and the results show a positive interaction of sTM with fibrinogen, factor VIII, and von Willebrand factor levels. Work is in progress to characterize the risk by combinatorial analysis.


*    Acknowledgments
 
The ARIC study was funded by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute contracts N01-HC-55015, N01-HC-55016, N01-HC-55018, N01-HC-55019, N01-HC-55020, N01-HC-55021, and N01-HC-55022. The authors thank Dr Lloyd Chambless for assistance in data analysis and Susan Mitterling for editorial assistance. We also thank the ARIC participants and staff for their important contributions over many years.


*    Footnotes
 
Guest editor for this article was Paul M Ridker, MD, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Mass.

This article originally appeared Online on March 31, 2003 (Circulation. 2003;107:r66–r69).

Received November 13, 2002; revision received February 12, 2003; accepted February 18, 2003.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Sadler JE. Thrombomodulin structure and function. Thromb Haemost. 1997; 78: 392–395.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Esmon CT. Thrombomodulin as a model of molecular mechanisms that modulate protease specificity and function at the vessel surface. FASEB J. 1995; 9: 946–955.[Abstract]

3. Ishii H, Majerus PW. Thrombomodulin is present in human plasma and urine. J Clin Invest. 1985; 76: 2178–2181.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Salomaa V, Matei C, Aleksic N, et al. Soluble thrombomodulin as a predictor of incident coronary heart disease and symptomless carotid artery atherosclerosis in ARIC study: a case-cohort study. Lancet. 1999; 353: 1729–1734.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Albelda SM, Smith CW, Ward PA. Adhesive molecules and inflammatory injury. FASEB J. 1994; 8: 504–512.[Abstract]

6. Hwang S-J, Ballantyne CM, Sharrett AR, et al. Circulating adhesion molecules VCAM-1, ICAM-1 and E-selectin in carotid atherosclerosis and incident coronary heart disease cases. Circulation. 1997; 96: 4219–4225.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. The ARIC Investigators. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study: design and objectives. Am J Epidemiol. 1989; 129: 687–702.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. White AD, Folsom AR, Chambless LE, et al. Community surveillance of coronary heart disease in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study: methods and initial two years experience. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996; 49: 223–233.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Rosamond WD, Chambless LE, Folsom AR, et al. Trends in coronary heart disease: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, 1987 to 1994. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339: 861–867.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Folsom AR, Wu KK, Rosamond WD, et al. Prospective study of hemostatic factors and incidence of coronary heart disease: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Circulation. 1997; 96: 1102–1108.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Papp AC, Hatzakis H, Bracey A, et al. ARIC hemostasis study I: development of blood collection and processing system suitable for multicenter hemostatic studies. Thromb Haemost. 1989; 61: 15–19.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Prentice RL. A case-cohort design for epidemiological cohort studies and disease prevention risk. Biometrika. 1986; 73: 1–11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Barlow WE. Robust variance estimation for the case-cohort design. Biometrics. 1994; 50: 1064–1072.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Esmon CT. New mechanisms for vascular control of inflammation mediated by natural anticoagulant proteins. J Exp Med. 2002; 196: 561–564.[Free Full Text]

15. Liuzzo G, Biasucci LM, Gallimore JR, et al. The prognostic value of C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A protein in severe unstable angina. N Engl J Med. 1994; 331: 417–424.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Ridker PM, Cushman M, Stampfer MJ, et al. Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336: 973–979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Archipoff G, Beretz A, Freyssinet J-M, et al. Heterogenous regulation of constitutive thrombomodulin on inducible tissue factor activities on the surface of human saphenous vein endothelial cells in culture following stimulation by interleukin-1, tumor necrosis factor, thrombin or phorbol ester. Biochem J. 1991; 273: 679–684.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Moore KL, Andreoli SP, Esmon NL, et al. Endotoxin enhances tissue factor and suppresses thrombomodulin expression of human vascular endothelium in vivo. J Clin Invest. 1987; 79: 124–130.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Gearing AJH, Newman W. Circulating adhesion molecules in disease. Immunol Today. 1993; 14: 506–512.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Pigott R, Dillon LP, Hemingway IH, et al. Soluble forms of E-selectin, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 are present in the supernatants of cytokine activated endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1989; 187: 584–589.

21. Libby P. Current concepts of the pathogenesis of the acute coronary syndrome. Circulation. 2001; 104: 365–372.[Free Full Text]

22. Folsom AR, Aleksic N, Park E, et al. Prospective study of fibrinolytic factors and incident coronary heart disease: the ARIC study. Atheroscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21: 611–617.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
K. Auro, K. Komulainen, M. Alanne, K. Silander, L. Peltonen, M. Perola, and V. Salomaa
Thrombomodulin Gene Polymorphisms and Haplotypes and the Risk of Cardiovascular Events: A Prospective Follow-Up Study
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, April 1, 2006; 26(4): 942 - 947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. David-Dufilho, E. M.-V. Brussel, G. Topal, L. Walch, A. Brunet, and F. Rendu
Endothelial Thrombomodulin Induces Ca2+ Signals and Nitric Oxide Synthesis through Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Kinase and Calmodulin Kinase II
J. Biol. Chem., October 28, 2005; 280(43): 35999 - 36006.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
E. M. Stuveling, S. J. L. Bakker, H. L. Hillege, P. E. de Jong, R. O. B. Gans, and D. de Zeeuw
Biochemical risk markers: a novel area for better prediction of renal risk?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 497 - 508.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
M. V. de Wouwer, D. Collen, and E. M. Conway
Thrombomodulin-Protein C-EPCR System: Integrated to Regulate Coagulation and Inflammation
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, August 1, 2004; 24(8): 1374 - 1383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J.-M. Olivot, J. Labreuche, M. Aiach, P. Amarenco, and for the GENIC Investigators
Soluble Thrombomodulin and Brain Infarction: Case-Control and Prospective Study
Stroke, August 1, 2004; 35(8): 1946 - 1951.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. P. Hutchinson, K. K. Wu, N. Aleksic, C. Ahn, H. Juneja, E. Boerwinkle, and C. M. Ballantyne
A Possible Explanation of Statistical Interaction, With Application to the Effects of Soluble Thrombomodulin and Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 on Coronary Heart Disease * Response
Circulation, December 23, 2003; 108 (25): e175 - e175.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
107/13/1729    most recent
01.CIR.0000064894.97094.4Fv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wu, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Boerwinkle, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wu, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Boerwinkle, E.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute coronary syndromes
Right arrow Epidemiology