| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2003;107:1497.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From Stanford University Medical Center, Divisions of Cardiovascular Medicine (D.P.L., N.A.H., B.L.H., W.F.F., M.R., A.J.C., A.C.Y.) and Emergency Medicine (M.H., D.S.), Stanford, Calif, and Merck Research Laboratories (P.M.D.), Blue Bell, Pa.
Correspondence to Dr David P. Lee, Stanford University Medical Center, Interventional Cardiology, Room H-2103, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305. E-mail dplee{at}stanford.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results A total of 100 patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction were randomized to either early administration of tirofiban in the emergency room or later administration in the catheterization laboratory. The primary outcome measures were initial TIMI grade flow, corrected TIMI frame counts, and TIMI grade myocardial perfusion ("blush"). Thirty-day major adverse cardiac events were also assessed. Angiographic outcomes demonstrate a significant improvement in initial TIMI grade flow, corrected TIMI frame counts, and TIMI grade myocardial perfusion when patients are given tirofiban in the emergency room before primary angioplasty. The rate of 30-day major adverse cardiac events suggests that early administration may be beneficial.
Conclusions This pilot study suggests that early administration of tirofiban improves angiographic outcomes and is safe and feasible in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.
Key Words: myocardial infarction angioplasty platelets
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Primary angioplasty has been adopted as the preferred initial reperfusion strategy in the treatment of AMI at many institutions. Mechanical reperfusion has shown some advantages over fibrinolytic therapy2,3 in this setting, and important previous work has correlated initial TIMI grade flow4 and thrombus burden5 with clinical outcomes. Recent studies in advancing the treatment of AMI include the use of novel coronary stents6 and glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors in combination with fibrinolytics7 or primary angioplasty.813
The timing of the GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor administration may be important in establishing early reperfusion. Earlier administration may yield an improvement in initial angiographic outcomes, which may result in an important clinical benefit.4 Tirofiban is a potent synthetic GP IIb/IIIa receptor blocker that has previously been studied in acute coronary syndromes1416 and in percutaneous interventions.17,18 In the present study, we examined 100 patients presenting with AMI who received tirofiban in either the emergency room (ER) before primary angioplasty or in the catheterization laboratory after diagnostic angiography just before primary angioplasty.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
0.1 mV ST-segment elevation in 2 or more contiguous leads or documented new left bundle-branch block. Important exclusion criteria included cardiogenic shock, use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), and known bleeding diathesis. After initial screening and patient consent, open-label randomization was conferred within a 1:1 ratio of "early" administration (ie, in the ER) of tirofiban versus "late" administration in the catheterization laboratory. Computerized randomization assignments in blinded envelopes were used in a consecutive fashion in the ER. The dose of tirofiban was per the Randomized Efficacy Study of Tirofiban for Outcomes and REstenosis (RESTORE) protocol (10 µg/kg over 3 minutes as a bolus, followed by 0.15 µg · kg-1 · min-1 x24 hours). The dose of unfractionated heparin administered in the ER was dictated by the time of administration. Early tirofiban administration required a heparin bolus of 70 U/kg followed by 5 U · kg-1 · h-1, whereas late administration mandated a 100-U/kg bolus with a maintenance dose of 10 U · kg-1 · h-1. Other medications, including ß-blockers, nitrates, and morphine, were administered at the discretion of the attending physician.
Diagnostic angiography was performed in all patients before planned revascularization; per protocol, if there was a
50% lesion in the culprit vessel, no revascularization was performed. Revascularization was performed at the discretion of the attending physician with any US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)approved coronary revascularization devices. If a coronary stent was placed, clopidogrel (300 mg orally, followed by 75 mg per day for at least 28 days) or ticlopidine (500 mg orally, followed by 250 mg twice per day for at least 28 days) was mandated. An FDA-approved vascular closure device was also allowed per protocol. If no vascular closure device was used, manual compression was performed when the activated clotting time was <180 seconds.
Laboratory screening included an initial complete blood count with platelet count, a serum creatinine, and total creatine phosphokinase (CPK), CPK-MB, and troponin levels. After admission, the complete blood count with platelet count and CPK were repeated every 6 hours and on a daily basis until discharge. A daily and a discharge ECG were also required.
Important recorded time intervals included time from initial onset of chest pain to arrival in the ER, time from initial arrival to tirofiban administration (door to drug), and time from initial arrival to first angioplasty balloon inflation (door to balloon).
Bleeding complications were recorded, and TIMI definitions of minor and major bleeding19 were used. Platelet counts were also monitored for thrombocytopenia, defined as a platelet count of <100 000/mm3. Post-hospital follow-up included at least one telephone conversation or clinic visit at 30 days documenting any of the clinical adverse events (death, re-MI, or rehospitalization) per the protocol.
Angiographic analysis included initial and final TIMI grade flow,20 corrected TIMI frame count,21 and TIMI myocardial perfusion grade22 of the culprit vessel. These were performed off-line and by at least 2 blinded independent observers (N.H. and B.H.) with averaging of the TIMI scores if they were not in agreement.
Statistical analysis was performed with the use of statistical software (StatView 5, SAS Institute Cary, NC,) using a
2 analysis or Fishers exact test for frequencies comparing the two treatment groups. A result was considered to be significant if the probability value was
0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Of the 100 patients enrolled, 50 received early tirofiban. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics (Table 1) or in their presentation (Table 2). The mean door-to-balloon time was similar in both groups, with the early treatment group averaging 89±21 minutes and the cath laboratory group 83±20 minutes (P=NS). The early treatment group received tirofiban for an average of 33 minutes (range, 19 to 45 minutes) before angioplasty. Of the 100 patients, 94 (47 in each group) received at least 1 stent after initial angioplasty, with the remaining 6 patients undergoing PTCA alone.
|
|
Angiographic analysis (Table 2) showed a statistically significant difference in initial TIMI grade 3 flow, corrected TIMI frame counts, and TIMI grade 3 myocardial perfusion scores favoring early tirofiban administration. The percentage of patients with initial TIMI grade 3 flow before angioplasty was 32% in the early group and 10% in the late group (P<0.007; Figure 1). Corrected initial TIMI frame counts were significantly lower in the early group (44±20 versus 66±23, P=0.005; Figure 2). Finally, initial TIMI grade 3 myocardial perfusion was seen in 32% of the early patients and 6% of the late patients (P<0.001; Figure 3).
|
|
|
Ninety-two percent of patients in both groups had postprocedural TIMI grade 3 flow. This was also reflected in the corrected TIMI frame counts (18±8 and 16±8, respectively; P=NS), as well as in the percentage of patients with a final TIMI myocardial perfusion grade of 3 (50% versus 40%, respectively; P=NS).
Between the independent observers, there were no differences in estimating TIMI grade flow at the initial and final angiograms in all cases. The corrected TIMI frame count varied <5% between them for all cases, and the TIMI myocardial perfusion grade also had only 2 cases with a difference in score of 1.
The peak CPK was measured in all patients while in the hospital (Table 3). The early treatment group had a mean peak CPK of 1924±1699 IU/L, whereas the late cath laboratory group had a mean of 2260±1959 (P=NS). The mean time to peak CPK was slightly lower in the early group (10.0±7.1 hours) than in the late group (11.7±6.5; P=NS).
|
No differences were noted between the two groups with regard to bleeding complications (Table 3), although the sample size was too small to detect modest differences in these low-frequency events. TIMI-defined minor and major bleeding was not statistically different, with 5 minor bleeds (10%) in the early group and 3 (6%) in the late group (P=0.47) and 1 major bleed in each group (2%). Five transfusions (10%) were given in the early group and 4 (8%) in the late group. Thrombocytopenia, as defined by a platelet count of <100 000/mm3 after tirofiban administration, was seen in only 2 patients (4%), both in the early administration arm. Neither of these patients had a drop in their platelet counts below 50 000/mm3 (severe thrombocytopenia).
The 30-day clinical outcomes (Table 3) revealed a lower number of clinical adverse events (combined outcome of death, recurrent MI, or rehospitalization) favoring the early treatment group (6% early; 10% late; P=0.47). No significant differences were seen with each individual outcome, with a low death rate (2% in both groups) and low re-MI (0% in the early group and 2% in the late group) and rehospitalization rates (4% and 6%, respectively) favoring the early treatment group. The patient in the late group who had a re-MI was the only patient in the study who underwent target vessel revascularization within the 30-day follow-up.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
6% of patients in RESTORE underwent primary angioplasty for a diagnosis of AMI and were given tirofiban or placebo in the catheterization laboratory after the lesion was crossed with a guidewire. Although the overall data showed a trend favoring the tirofiban group, no data from this trial have been reported with regard to the subset of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for AMI. The angiographic findings of this pilot trial suggest that early administration of tirofiban, ie, in the ER on AMI presentation, significantly improves initial TIMI flow grade, including the percentage of patients with initial TIMI grade 3 flow, corrected frame counts, and myocardial perfusion when compared with administration at the time of the primary angioplasty. This result was seen with 33-minute earlier initiation of platelet GP IIb/IIIa inhibition and with a lower dose of heparin than in the late administration arm, suggesting that tirofiban was the primary agent responsible for the improvement in flow.
Our positive clinical findings are most likely due to the effect of GP IIb/IIIa blockade on prevention of microembolization and further impairment of the coronary microcirculation. This is reflected not only in the improved TIMI flow grade and corrected frame counts but also in the myocardial perfusion grade, which is thought to reflect the functionality of the coronary microvascular circulation.22
An early pilot trial, ReoPro in acute MI (ReoMI),8 in which abciximab was administered in the ER, showed only a 9% TIMI grade 3 flow rate using a weight-based bolus and infusion scheme and a similar lower dose of heparin as used in our study. The mean time from abciximab administration to angiography was also similar to our study. The differences in the TIMI grade 3 flow may be related to the small sample size or possibly the wide range of drug-to-PTCA times (3 to 96 minutes) seen in ReoMI.
Our results are more consistent with the Abciximab before Direct angioplasty and stenting Myocardial Infarction Registering Acute Long-term follow-up (ADMIRAL) trial,11 which found a slightly lower overall TIMI grade 3 flow rate (21%) with abciximab, but this was in the setting of only 26% of AMI patients receiving abciximab in either the ER or ambulance before primary angioplasty. In that trial, a 30-day follow-up angiogram with left ventricular (LV) function was performed, suggesting improved LV ejection fraction and a lower composite event rate of death, reinfarction, or revascularization in those who had received abciximab in combination with primary angioplasty when compared with placebo control. This improved outcome with a greater number of patients with normal TIMI grade flow is consistent with previous findings.4 Another study combining abciximab and a percutaneous coronary intervention in the setting of AMI, Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC),12 also suggested a clinical benefit for abciximab but did not include patients with preintervention administration of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor.
One potential price of earlier administration of tirofiban could be increased bleeding, but in the present trial no significant differences were detected in bleeding rates as defined by TIMI criteria. The rate of minor bleeding in this trial with early administration of tirofiban (10%) or in the overall cohort (8%) is very similar to the minor bleeding rate in ADMIRAL patients receiving abciximab (12.1%). Major bleeding rates were also low in TIGER-PA (2%), with blood transfusions seen in 9% of patients. Thrombocytopenia was also rare in the overall cohort (2%), with no cases of severe thrombocytopenia. These results are consistent with ADMIRAL and other recent elective GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor stenting trials.24,25
It is interesting to speculate about the potential for further optimizing the dosing of tirofiban in the setting of PCI. Data from the do Tirofiban And ReoPro Give similar Efficacy outcomes Trial (TARGET),18 in which tirofiban was found to be inferior to abciximab with regard to its primary end point of 30-day major adverse cardiac events in the setting of coronary stenting, has led some investigators to believe that suboptimal dosing of tirofiban was at least partly responsible for the result. Indeed, early inhibition of platelet aggregation using the RESTORE dosing is lower than with the standard abciximab dosing regimen.27 However, Neumann et al28 also studied inhibition of platelet aggregation with all 3 FDA-approved GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors and found that with the dose of tirofiban used in the present trial, similar levels of platelet inhibition were achieved by all 3 agents at time points >2 hours after drug initiation. Interestingly, 6-month major adverse cardiac event results from TARGET suggested no significant difference between the tirofiban- and abciximab-treated groups.29 If a higher dose of tirofiban was used in the ER in this pilot study, there probably would be a greater level of platelet inhibition with a possible improvement in initial TIMI grade 3 flow rates and myocardial perfusion. This, however, could potentially come at the cost of an increase in bleeding events. It is also unknown whether a new, higher dosing scheme30 would necessarily translate into better clinical outcomes, although, at least in theory, earlier reperfusion should lead to less myocardial damage and its sequelae.
The main limitation of this trial is that the study was underpowered to show a significant difference in clinical events, both from an efficacy standpoint and a safety standpoint. It is unknown whether the earlier reperfusion seen in our study would necessarily translate into a better mortality outcome, although previous data with 60- and 90-minute restoration of normal TIMI grade angiographic parameters have shown reduced mortality.31,32 Further study is required to fully assess the clinical impact of the early initiation strategy tested here. In addition, the exclusion criteria included cardiogenic shock or use of an IABP, which in this report excluded 11% of the initially screened patients. As a result, these data may not apply to those situations in which an IABP is used for cardiogenic shock or to augment coronary perfusion.
At many hospitals, the current mainstay of reperfusion for patients presenting with AMI is primary angioplasty. It has been shown to be superior to fibrinolytic therapy, as long as the door-to-balloon time remains short and an experienced operator is involved.1,2 The present study suggests that, in centers where primary angioplasty is the preferred reperfusion strategy, the administration of tirofiban in the ER for AMI is safe and feasible while augmenting reperfusion even before reaching the catheterization laboratory. This study was underpowered to show a significant difference in clinical end points, but on the basis of the documented association of TIMI grade 3 flow and myocardial perfusion grade with improved clinical outcomes, it does suggest that earlier initiation of reperfusion with tirofiban in combination with primary angioplasty may translate into improved patient outcomes. Larger investigations with administration of GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists in the ER for AMI in combination with primary angioplasty should confirm our findings from this pilot trial and likely show an improved clinical outcome.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received November 14, 2002; revision received December 18, 2002; accepted December 19, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. The GUSTO IIb Investigators. A clinical trial comparing primary coronary angioplasty with tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336: 16211628.
3. Zijlstra F, Hoorntje JC, de Boer MJ, et al. Long-term benefit of primary angioplasty as compared with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341: 14131419.
4. Stone GW, Cox D, Garcia E, et al. Normal flow (TIMI-3) before mechanical reperfusion therapy is an independent determinant of survival in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction trials. Circulation. 2001; 104: 636641.
5. Tofler GH. Triggering and the pathophysiology of acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J. 1997; 134: S55S61.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Grines CL, Cox DA, Stone GW, et al. Coronary angioplasty with or without stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction. Stent Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341: 19491956.
7. Topol EJ, for the the GUSTO V Investigators. Reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction with fibrinolytic therapy or combination reduced fibrinolytic therapy and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition: the GUSTO V randomised trial. Lancet. 2001; 357: 19051914.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Makkar R, Goff B, Eigler N, et al. Effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition without thrombolytic therapy on reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction: results of the ReoMI pilot study. Cath Card Intervent. 1999; 48: 430434.
9. Brener S, Barr LA, Burchenal JE, et al, for the RAPPORT Investigators. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998; 98: 734741.
10. Van den Merkhof LFM, Zijlstra F, Olsson H, et al. Abciximab in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction eligible for primary transluminal coronary angioplasty: results of the glycoprotein receptor antagonist patency evaluation (GRAPE) pilot study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 33: 15281532.
11. Montalescot G, Barragan P, Wittenberg O, et al, for the ADMIRAL investigators. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition with coronary stenting for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2002; 344: 18951903.
12. Stone GW, Grines CL, Cox DA, et al, for the CADILLAC Investigators. Comparison of angioplasty with stenting, with or without abciximab, in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 957966.
13. Cutlip DE, Cove CJ, Irons D, et al. Emergency room administration of eptifibatide before primary angioplasty for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction and its effect on baseline coronary flow and procedural outcomes. Am J Cardiol. 2001; 88: 6264.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. The PRISM Study Investigators. Comparison of aspirin plus tirofiban with aspirin plus heparin for unstable angina. N Engl J Med. 1998; 338: 14981505.
15. The PRISM-PLUS Study Investigators. Inhibition of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor with tirofiban in unstable angina and nonQ-wave myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1998; 338: 14881497.
16. Cannon CP, for the TIMI-18 Investigators. Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 18791887.
17. The RESTORE Investigators. Effects of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade with tirofiban on adverse cardiac events in patients with unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction undergoing coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1997; 96: 14451453.
18. Topol E, Moliterno DJ, Herrmann HC, et al. Comparison of two platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, tirofiban and abciximab, for the prevention of ischemic events with percutaneous coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 18881894.
19. Bovill EG, Terrin ML, Stump DC, et al. Hemorrhagic events during therapy with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator, heparin, and aspirin for acute myocardial infarction: results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) phase II trial. Ann Intern Med. 1991; 115: 256265.
20. TIMI Study Group. The Thombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial: phase 1 findings. N Engl J Med. 1985; 312: 932936.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Daley WL, et al. TIMI frame count: a quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow. Circulation. 1996; 93: 879888.
22. Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Murphy SA, et al. The relationship of the TIMI myocardial perfusion grade to mortality flowing thrombolytic administration. Circulation. 2000; 101: 125130.
23. The EPIC Investigators. Use of a monoclonal antibody directed against the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor in high-risk coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1994; 330: 956961.
24. The EPISTENT Investigators. Randomised placebo-controlled and balloon-angioplasty-controlled trial to assess safety of coronary stenting with use of glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa blockade. Lancet. 1998; 352: 8792.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. The ESPRIT Investigators. Novel dosing regimen of eptifibatide in planned coronary stent implantation (ESPRIT). Lancet. 2000; 356: 20372044.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. The PURSUIT Study Group. Inhibition of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa with eptifibatide in patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation: a randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339: 436443.
27. Kabbani SS, Aggarwal A, Terrien EF, et al. Suboptimal early inhibition of platelets by treatment with tirofiban and implications for coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 89: 647650.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Neumann F-J, Hochholzer W, Pogatsa-Murray G, et al. Antiplatelet effects of abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide in patients undergoing coronary stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 13231328.
29. Moliterno DJ, Yakubov SJ, DiBattiste PM, et al, for the TARGET Investigators. Outcomes at 6 months for the direct comparison of tirofiban and abciximab during percutaneous coronary revascularisation with stent placement: the TARGET follow-up study. Lancet. 2002; 360: 355360.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Schneider DJ, Herrmann HC, Lakkis N, et al. Enhanced early inhibition of platelet aggregation with an increased bolus of tirofiban. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 90: 14211423.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Gibson CM, Murphy SA, Marble SJ, et al, for the TIMI Study Group. Can we replace the 90-minute thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grades with those at 60 minutes as a primary end point in thrombolytic trials? TIMI Study Group. Am J Cardiol. 2001; 87: 450453.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Murphy SA, et al, for the TIMI Study Group. Relationship of the TIMI myocardial perfusion grades, flow grades, frame count, and percutaneous coronary intervention to long-term outcomes after thrombolytic administration in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2002; 105: 19091913.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C.-C. Fang, Yeun Tarl Fresner NgJao, Yi Chen, C.-L. Yu, and S.-P. Wang Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitor (Tirofiban) in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Angiology, April 1, 2009; 60(2): 192 - 200. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Ortolani, A. Marzocchi, C. Marrozzini, T. Palmerini, F. Saia, N. Taglieri, F. Baldazzi, G. Dall'Ara, P. Nardini, S. Gianstefani, et al. Long-term effectiveness of early administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa agents to real-world patients undergoing primary percutaneous interventions: results of a registry study in an ST-elevation myocardial infarction network Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2009; 30(1): 33 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Marzocchi, A. Manari, G. Piovaccari, C. Marrozzini, S. Marra, P. Magnavacchi, P. Sangiorgio, L. Marinucci, N. Taglieri, G. Gordini, et al. Randomized comparison between tirofiban and abciximab to promote complete ST-resolution in primary angioplasty: results of the facilitated angioplasty with tirofiban or abciximab (FATA) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction trial Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2008; 29(24): 2972 - 2980. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G De Luca, C M Gibson, F Bellandi, S Murphy, M Maioli, M Noc, U Zeymer, D Dudek, H-R Arntz, S Zorman, et al. Early glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors in primary angioplasty (EGYPT) cooperation: an individual patient data meta-analysis Heart, December 1, 2008; 94(12): 1548 - 1558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. De Luca Adjunctive antithrombotic therapy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2008; 10(suppl_J): J2 - J14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Goodman, V. Menon, C. P. Cannon, G. Steg, E. M. Ohman, and R. A. Harrington Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition) Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 708S - 775S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Asso, Developed in Collaboration With the Canadian Cardi, Endorsed by the American Academy of Family Physici, 2007 Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Upda, E. M. Antman, M. Hand, P. W. Armstrong, E. R. Bates, L. A. Green, L. K. Halasyamani, et al. 2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 15, 2008; 51(2): 210 - 247. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Asso, 2007 Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Upda, S. B. King III, S. C. Smith Jr, J. W. Hirshfeld Jr, A. K. Jacobs, D. A. Morrison, and D. O. Williams 2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 15, 2008; 51(2): 172 - 209. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Antman, M. Hand, P. W. Armstrong, E. R. Bates, L. A. Green, L. K. Halasyamani, J. S. Hochman, H. M. Krumholz, G. A. Lamas, C. J. Mullany, et al. 2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: Developed in Collaboration With the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Endorsed by the American Academy of Family Physicians: 2007 Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Writing on Behalf of the 2004 Writing Committee Circulation, January 15, 2008; 117(2): 296 - 329. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. King III, S. C. Smith Jr, J. W. Hirshfeld Jr, A. K. Jacobs, D. A. Morrison, D. O. Williams, 2005 WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, S. C. Smith Jr, T. E. Feldman, J. W. Hirshfeld Jr, et al. 2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: 2007 Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Writing on Behalf of the 2005 Writing Committee Circulation, January 15, 2008; 117(2): 261 - 295. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Dobrzycki, P. Kralisz, K. Nowak, P. Prokopczuk, W. Kochman, J. Korecki, B. Poniatowski, J. Zuk, E. Sitniewska, H. Bachorzewska-Gajewska, et al. Transfer with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban for primary percutaneous coronary intervention vs. on-site thrombolysis in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI): a randomized open-label study for patients admitted to community hospitals Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2007; 28(20): 2438 - 2448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. H. Ting, E. H. Yang, and C. S. Rihal Narrative review: reperfusion strategies for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med, October 17, 2006; 145(8): 610 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Gibson, D. A. Morrow, S. A. Murphy, T. M. Palabrica, L. K. Jennings, P. H. Stone, H. H. Lui, T. Bulle, N. Lakkis, R. Kovach, et al. A Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Relative Protection Against Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Microvascular Dysfunction, Ischemia, and Inflammation Among Antiplatelet and Antithrombotic Agents: The PROTECT-TIMI-30 Trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 20, 2006; 47(12): 2364 - 2373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Svilaas, I. C.C. van der Horst, and F. Zijlstra The role of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2005; 26(23): 2479 - 2481. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. P. Wharton Jr, E. C. Keeley, C. L. Grines, T. P. Wharton Jr, E. C. Keeley, and C. L. Grines The Case for Community Hospital Angioplasty Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22): 3509 - 3534. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Zeymer, R. Zahn, R. Schiele, W. Jansen, E. Girth, A. Gitt, K. Seidl, R. Schroder, S. Schneider, and J. Senges Early eptifibatide improves TIMI 3 patency before primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction: results of the randomized integrilin in acute myocardial infarction (INTAMI) pilot trial Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2005; 26(19): 1971 - 1977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Huber, R. D. Caterina, S. D. Kristensen, F. W.A. Verheugt, G. Montalescot, L. B. Maestro, F. V. d. Werf, and for the Task Force on Pre-hospital Reperfusion The Pre-hospital reperfusion therapy: a strategy to improve therapeutic outcome in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2005; 26(19): 2063 - 2074. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Beygui and G. Montalescot The use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors into new perspectives: pre-catheterization laboratory administration Eur. Heart J. Suppl., October 1, 2005; 7(suppl_I): I10 - I14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. De Luca, H. Suryapranata, G. W. Stone, D. Antoniucci, J. E. Tcheng, F.-J. Neumann, F. Van de Werf, E. M. Antman, and E. J. Topol Abciximab as Adjunctive Therapy to Reperfusion in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials JAMA, April 13, 2005; 293(14): 1759 - 1765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Terkelsen, J. F. Lassen, B. L. Norgaard, J. C. Gerdes, S. H. Poulsen, K. Bendix, J. P. Ankersen, L. B.-H. Gotzsche, F. K. Romer, T. T. Nielsen, et al. Reduction of treatment delay in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: impact of pre-hospital diagnosis and direct referral to primary percutanous coronary intervention Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2005; 26(8): 770 - 777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Authors/Task Force Members, S. Silber, P. Albertsson, F. F. Aviles, P. G. Camici, A. Colombo, C. Hamm, E. Jorgensen, J. Marco, J.-E. Nordrehaug, et al. Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2005; 26(8): 804 - 847. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Writing Committee Members, E. M. Antman, D. T. Anbe, P. W. Armstrong, E. R. Bates, L. A. Green, M. Hand, J. S. Hochman, H. M. Krumholz, F. G. Kushner, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-Elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 4, 2004; 44(3): 671 - 719. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Antman, D. T. Anbe, P. W. Armstrong, E. R. Bates, L. A. Green, M. Hand, J. S. Hochman, H. M. Krumholz, F. G. Kushner, G. A. Lamas, et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction--Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction) Circulation, August 3, 2004; 110(5): 588 - 636. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. O. Costantini, G. W. Stone, R. Mehran, E. Aymong, C. L. Grines, D. A. Cox, T. Stuckey, M. Turco, B. J. Gersh, J. E. Tcheng, et al. Frequency, correlates, and clinical implications of myocardial perfusion after primary angioplasty and stenting, with and without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition, in acute myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2004; 44(2): 305 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. I. Simon and M. Sakuma Platelet disaggregation: Putting time on your side in acute myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2004; 44(2): 324 - 326. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Montalescot, M. Borentain, L. Payot, J. P. Collet, and D. Thomas Early vs Late Administration of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-analysis JAMA, July 21, 2004; 292(3): 362 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G Montalescot, H R Andersen, D Antoniucci, A Betriu, M J de Boer, L Grip, F J Neumann, and M T Rothman Recommendations on percutaneous coronary intervention for the reperfusion of acute ST elevation myocardial infarction Heart, June 1, 2004; 90(6): e37 - e37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Antman and F. Van de Werf Pharmacoinvasive Therapy: The Future of Treatment for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Circulation, June 1, 2004; 109(21): 2480 - 2486. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W.J van't Hof, N. Ernst, M.-J. de Boer, R. de Winter, E. Boersma, T. Bunt, S. Petronio, A.T Marcel Gosselink, W. Jap, F. Hollak, et al. Facilitation of primary coronary angioplasty by early start of a glycoprotein 2b/3a inhibitor: results of the ongoing tirofiban in myocardial infarction evaluation (On-TIME) trial Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2004; 25(10): 837 - 846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. W. O'Neill and S. R. Dixon The year in interventional cardiology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 3, 2004; 43(5): 875 - 890. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Lincoff Coupling Drug and Catheter Therapy for Myocardial Infarction JAMA, February 25, 2004; 291(8): 1000 - 1002. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Topol, F.-J. Neumann, and G. Montalescot A preferred reperfusion strategy for acute myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 3, 2003; 42(11): 1886 - 1889. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Dalby, A. Bouzamondo, P. Lechat, and G. Montalescot Transfer for Primary Angioplasty Versus Immediate Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis Circulation, October 14, 2003; 108(15): 1809 - 1814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Gibson Confusion in reperfusion J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2003; 42(7): 1186 - 1187. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Emergency-Room Tirofiban Before Primary Angioplasty Journal Watch Cardiology, May 23, 2003; 2003(523): 2 - 2. [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |