Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2003;107:1492-1496
Published online before print March 10, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000058168.26163.BC
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
107/11/1492    most recent
01.CIR.0000058168.26163.BCv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fox, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Benjamin, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fox, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Benjamin, E. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valvular heart disease
Right arrow Echocardiography
Right arrow Epidemiology

(Circulation. 2003;107:1492.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Mitral Annular Calcification Predicts Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality

The Framingham Heart Study

Caroline S. Fox, MD, MPH; Ramachandran S. Vasan, MD; Helen Parise, ScD; Daniel Levy, MD; Christopher J. O’Donnell, MD, MPH; Ralph B. D’Agostino, PhD; Emelia J. Benjamin, MD, ScM

From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s Framingham Heart Study (all authors), Framingham, Mass; the Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.J.O.); the Cardiology Section, Department of Medicine and Preventive Medicine Section, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (R.S.V., D.L., E.J.B.); the Department of Mathematics, Boston University, Boston, Mass (H.P., R.D.); and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (C.S.F., D.L., C.J.O.).

Correspondence to Emelia J. Benjamin, MD, ScM, Framingham Heart Study, 73 Mt Wayte Ave, Suite #2, Framingham, MA 01702-5827. E-mail emelia{at}fram.nhlbi.nih.gov


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Mitral annular calcification (MAC) has been associated with stroke in longitudinal, community-based cohorts and cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes in many small retrospective studies. Prospective data are limited on the relation of MAC with CVD morbidity and mortality.

Methods and Results— We examined the association between MAC assessed by M-mode echocardiography and the incidence of CVD, CVD death, and all-cause death over 16 years of follow-up in the Framingham Heart Study subjects who attended a routine examination between 1979 and 1981. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) associated with the presence of MAC for each outcome. Of 1197(445 male, 752 female) subjects who had adequate echocardiographic assessment, 14% had MAC. There were 307 incident CVD events and 621 deaths. In multivariable adjusted analyses, MAC was associated with an increased risk of incident CVD (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1, 2.0), CVD death (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1, 2.3), and all-cause death (HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.04, 1.6). For each 1-mm increase in MAC, the risk of incident CVD, CVD death, and all-cause death increased by {approx}10%.

Conclusions— The independent association of MAC with incident CVD and CVD death underscores that cardiac calcification is a marker of increased CVD risk.


Key Words: calcium • echocardiography • cardiovascular diseases • mortality


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Mitral annular calcification (MAC) is a fibrous, degenerative calcification of the mitral valve support ring.1,2 It was first described in 1908 by Bonninger3 in its association with complete heart block. Since then, it has been associated with endocarditis,4 coronary artery disease,5–9 and congestive heart failure10–12 in several studies, which mostly have been small and retrospective in design. In a prior prospective investigation from the Framingham Heart Study, MAC was independently associated with stroke.13

Subclinical cardiovascular disease (CVD) measurements have been demonstrated to have the same risk factors as clinically overt CVD14 and to be predictive of incident CVD events.15–18 Other valvular calcification measurements, including aortic sclerosis and aortic stenosis, have been shown to be manifestations of subclinical CVD by virtue of their association with CVD risk factors19 and with an increased risk of CVD events, including coronary artery disease,8 stroke,20 and CVD death.21

Because risk factors for MAC are similar to risk factors for CVD, including age, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and obesity,22–25 we hypothesized that MAC also may be a manifestation of subclinical atherosclerotic CVD. Thus, we sought to examine the association of MAC with incident CVD events in the community-based Framingham Heart Study sample. We hypothesized that the risk of incident CVD events would be higher in subjects with MAC.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Subjects in the original cohort of the Framingham Heart Study were eligible for the present investigation. The Framingham Heart Study began in 1948 with the enrollment of 5209 men and women, 28 to 62 years of age, with subjects undergoing examinations every 2 years.26,27 M-mode echocardiograms were obtained in the 2291 members of the cohort undergoing a routine examination performed between 1979 to 1981, which served as the index examination for this investigation. Subjects were excluded for mitral stenosis or mitral prosthesis (n=23). Because of the stringent criteria for measurability, the advanced age of the subjects, and the reliance on the M-mode technique, 49% (n=1131) of the subjects were excluded for suboptimal M-mode tracings with regard to the interpretation of MAC. Furthermore, we excluded subjects with prevalent myocardial infarction (n=72), congestive heart failure (n=35), and CVD at baseline (n=146) for analyses with these end points as outcomes.

Echocardiography was performed with 2-dimensional guidance through a parasternal window. M-mode recordings were made with a Hoffrel 201 ultrasound machine with an Aerotech 2.25-MHz transducer and a Jason thermographic printer. Echocardiographers reinterpreted M-mode echocardiograms, blinded to all clinical information about the subjects, to determine the presence and severity of MAC as defined previously.13 Briefly, the disorder was considered present if an echodense band was visualized throughout systole and diastole, was distinguishable from the posterior mitral valve leaflet, and was located anterior and parallel to the posterior left ventricular wall. MAC was measured in millimeters by a cardiologist from the leading anterior to the trailing posterior edge at its greatest width during the cycle on at least 3 cardiac cycles.

Risk factors were characterized at the index Framingham Heart Study clinic examination. Details about the methods of risk factor measurement and laboratory analysis have been described.28 Diabetes was defined as a fasting glucose level >=140 mg/dL, a random nonfasting glucose level >=200 mg/dL, or use of insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents. Because only M-mode echocardiography was available at the index examination, baseline valvular disease was defined as any diastolic murmur, or a systolic murmur >2/6 on the physical examination performed by the Heart Study physician. Covariates were obtained at the index examination except for smoking, HDL cholesterol, and serum creatinine, which were ascertained at the prior examination.

Subjects were followed for up to 16 years for CVD events. A panel of 3 experienced investigators reviewed all CVD events, blinded to MAC status.28 Incident CVD events included myocardial infarction, coronary insufficiency, congestive heart failure, and nonhemorrhagic stroke; fatal CVD additionally included sudden cardiac death defined by previously reported criteria.

Statistical Analyses
For principal analyses, MAC was dichotomized (present/absent); in secondary analyses, MAC was examined as a continuous variable. Differences in baseline risk factors in subjects with and without MAC were tested by ANOVA or logistic regression after adjustment for age and sex. All incidence rates were age and sex adjusted and presented as events per 10 000 person-years of follow-up. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the association of MAC with the risks of myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, incident CVD events, CVD death, and all-cause death. Because the interaction between MAC and sex was not significant, all analyses were performed for pooled sexes, with adjustment for sex. All multivariable models were adjusted for age, sex, systolic blood pressure, hypertension treatment, diabetes, total/HDL cholesterol, body mass index (BMI), and ECG left ventricular hypertrophy with strain. Additional covariates were outcome specific according to prior literature and were as follows:


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Of 1197 subjects with adequate ECG assessment, 14% (n=169) had MAC. At the baseline examination, subjects with MAC were older; more likely to be female; and more likely to have higher systolic blood pressure, higher BMI, diabetes, ECG left ventricular hypertrophy, and clinical valve disease (Table 1). Subjects with MAC were also more likely to have prevalent atrial fibrillation, CVD, and congestive heart failure.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Baseline Characteristics of Participants With and Without MAC*

Overall, there were 307 cases of incident CVD, with an age- and sex-adjusted incidence rate of 554 per 10 000 person-years in subjects with MAC compared with 268 in 10 000 in subjects without MAC (Table 2). The Figure shows the age- and sex-adjusted cumulative incidence of CVD; the corresponding hazard ratio (HR) was 1.7 (Table 3). After multivariable adjustment, subjects with MAC were 50% more likely to have CVD in follow-up (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1, 2.0).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Incidence Rates per 10 000 Person-Years (Number of Events) Over 16 Years of Follow-Up in Participants With and Without MAC, Age- and Sex-Adjusted



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Cumulative incidence based on Cox proportional hazard age- and sex-adjusted models of (A) incident CVD; (B) CVD death; and (C) all-cause death in up to 15 years of follow-up. Vertical scale is from 0 to 0.6. Number of subjects at risk for the event by presence or absence of MAC is shown below figures.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Association of MAC With Incidence of Disease End Points

Overall, there were 621 deaths; 213 were attributed to CVD. The CVD mortality rate was 428 per 10 000 compared with 162 in 10 000 in subjects with and without MAC, respectively. The cumulative incidence of CVD death is displayed in the Figure. The age- and sex-adjusted HR for CVD death was 2.0, which remained significant after multivariable adjustment for baseline risk factors (HR, 1.6) and further adjustment for interim myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1, 2.2).

The all-cause mortality rate among subjects with MAC was 847 per 10 000 person-years, compared with 443 per 10 000 person-years in subjects without MAC; the Cox proportional hazards data are presented in the Figure. In age- and- sex-adjusted analyses, the HR was 1.5. After multivariable adjustment, the increased risk of all-cause death remained statistically significant (HR, 1.3). In an exploratory analysis adjusting for interim myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure, these results were essentially unchanged (HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.03, 1.6; Table 3).

In secondary analyses, MAC was analyzed as a continuous variable. For each 1-mm increase in MAC, the risk of incident CVD, CVD death, and all-cause death adjusted for relevant baseline risk factors increased by 9% (P<0.007), 12% (P<0.004) and 9% (P<0.001), respectively.

There were 138 cases of myocardial infarction and 191 cases of congestive heart failure in follow-up. In age- and sex-adjusted models, MAC was significantly related to incident myocardial infarction (HR, 1.7; P<0.01) and heart failure (HR, 1.9; P<0.001). After further adjustment for baseline covariates, MAC was not an independent risk factor for myocardial infarction (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.8, 2.2) or heart failure (HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9, 1.8). Given the small number of cases for these outcomes, we only had power of 30% and 12%, respectively, to detect HRs of 1.4 and 1.3 at an {alpha} level of 0.05 in fully adjusted dichotomous models. Of interest, when we analyzed MAC as a continuous variable in fully adjusted models, MAC was not associated with myocardial infarction but was associated with a significantly increased risk of heart failure. For each 1-mm increase in MAC, the HR for heart failure was 1.1 (95% CI, 1.03, 1.2; P<0.01). Thus, our lack of significant association between the presence or absence of MAC and myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure should be interpreted with caution.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In summary, the presence of mitral annular calcification predicts incident CVD events, CVD death, and all-cause death. We have shown that this increase in risk occurs in a dose-responsive manner. We believe that the association between MAC and incident CVD and death is consistent with the hypothesis that MAC is a marker of subclinical CVD.

Possible Mechanisms
Increasingly, it is recognized that vascular calcification, assessed by multiple modalities, including electron beam CT,29,30 echocardiography,21,25 and aortic arch calcification,32 is associated with CVD risk factors. Recent data also suggest an association between vascular calcification and incident CVD events.32–34 The pathophysiology of cardiac calcification is not known but may stem from metabolic causes. For example, it is known that coronary artery calcification is common in patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing dialysis,35 and it has also been observed that MAC is common in patients with end-stage kidney disease.36 Thus, derangements in calcium-phosphorous metabolism may contribute to MAC.

The association between vascular calcification, specifically MAC, and increased cardiovascular risk may also be due to the burden of shared risk factors, including age, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and obesity.22–25 Furthermore, MAC may function as a bioassay for longitudinal exposure to risk factors. For example, MAC may more accurately "measure" the impact of longitudinal blood pressure elevation than a blood pressure reading at one examination. MAC may also be a marker for atherosclerotic disease burden; the association between MAC and aortic plaque37,38 and coronary calcification6 has been previously noted. It is also possible to speculate that other unmeasured factors such as metabolic, inflammatory, and hemostatic risk factors might be associated and may account for relations of MAC with CVD end points.

Study Limitations and Strengths
Some limitations of our study warrant attention. The Framingham Heart Study sample is neither ethnically diverse nor nationally representative. However, the coronary heart disease risk factor relations from Framingham have recently been validated in 6 ethnically and geographically diverse cohorts and were found to be applicable in other populations.39 Second, our sample was elderly, and our findings may not be generalizable to younger individuals. In addition, to have sufficient numbers of events longitudinally to provide adequate statistical power for analyses, we relied on the echocardiographic technology available at the baseline examination, M-mode, which is less sensitive for the detection of MAC. Finally, as noted above, our study lacked sufficient power to adequately examine the relation of MAC to many clinically important CVD outcomes such as endocarditis and heart failure.

There are several strengths of our study. Many prior studies of cardiovascular outcomes with MAC have been limited by sample sizes as small as 38 subjects,7,10–12 retrospective12 or cross-sectional designs,6,7,25 nonuniform ascertainment of echocardiography,5,7,40,41 lack of recruitment of an appropriate control group,10–12 and lack of routine ascertainment of covariate data and multivariable analyses.8,25,40

The present study is among the first large-scale community-based cohort studies to examine the prospective association between MAC and incident cardiovascular events and death. Our study is the first to show a graded relation between MAC severity and clinical outcome. To our knowledge, the only prior longitudinal cohort study to examine the relation of MAC to CVD outcomes was the Cardiovascular Health Study,9 which examined multiple echocardiographic variables including left ventricular mass, dimensions, and wall thickness and left atrial dimensions, in addition to MAC (dichotomously analyzed). The investigators observed that the presence of MAC was associated with an unadjusted increased hazard for incident stroke, heart failure, coronary heart disease, and all-cause death. However, after adjustment for CVD risk factors, MAC only remained predictive of incident coronary heart disease. Possible reasons for the disparate findings between the two studies may include the older mean age (73 years), the shorter duration of follow-up (7 years), and the utilization of 2-dimensional MAC assessment in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Conceivably, our reliance on the less-sensitive M-mode technology may have led to the detection of more severe degrees of MAC, with a greater risk of incident events.

Implications
In conclusion, MAC was independently associated with incident CVD, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death after adjusting for traditional CVD risk factors, suggesting that MAC is a marker of increased cardiovascular risk. We have shown that this increased risk occurs in a graded fashion by MAC severity. The mechanisms of increased risk are undoubtedly multifactorial and include mechanical characteristics of MAC, shared risk factors between MAC and cardiovascular outcomes, and valvular calcification as an overall marker of atherosclerotic burden. The association of calcification of the mitral annulus with increased CVD risk parallels the previously reported elevated cardiovascular risk observed with the presence of echocardiographic aortic sclerosis. The prognostic importance of the calcification phenotype in multiple cardiac locations underscores the importance of understanding the genetic and environmental determinants of cardiac calcification.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s Framingham Heart Study (N01-HC-25195 and 5R01-NS-17950). Dr Vasan is the recipient of a research career award (1K24Hl04334) from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/National Institutes of Health.

Received October 4, 2002; revision received December 19, 2002; accepted January 2, 2003.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. D’Cruz I, Panetta F, Cohen H, et al. Submitral calcification or sclerosis in elderly patients: M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiography in "mitral anulus calcification." Am J Cardiol. 1979; 44: 31–38.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Hirschfeld DS, Emilson BB. Echocardiogram in calcified mitral anulus. Am J Cardiol. 1975; 36: 354–356.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Bonninger M. (a) Bluttransfusion bei pernizioser anamie: (b) Zwei Falle von Herzblock. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1908; 34: 2292.

4. Burnside JW, Desanctis RW. Bacterial endocarditis on calcification of the mitral anulus fibrosus. Ann Intern Med. 1972; 76: 615–618.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Jeon DS, Atar S, Brasch AV, et al. Association of mitral annulus calcification, aortic valve sclerosis and aortic root calcification with abnormal myocardial perfusion single photon emission tomography in subjects age < or =65 years old. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38: 1988–1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Tenenbaum A, Shemesh J, Fisman EZ, et al. Advanced mitral annular calcification is associated with severe coronary calcification on fast dual spiral computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2000; 35: 193–198.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Adler Y, Herz I, Vaturi M, et al. Mitral annular calcium detected by transthoracic echocardiography is a marker for high prevalence and severity of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol. 1998; 82: 1183–1186.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Aronow WS, Ahn C, Kronzon I. Association of mitral annular calcium and of aortic cuspal calcium with coronary artery disease in older patients. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 84: 1084–1085.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Gardin JM, McClelland R, Kitzman D, et al. M-mode echocardiographic predictors of six- to seven-year incidence of coronary heart disease, stroke, congestive heart failure, and mortality in an elderly cohort (the Cardiovascular Health Study). Am J Cardiol. 2001; 87: 1051–1057.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. D’Cruz IA, Cohen HC, Prabhu R, et al. Clinical manifestations of mitral annulus calcification, with emphasis on its echocardiographic features. Am Heart J. 1977; 94: 367–377.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Mellino M, Salcedo EE, Lever HM, et al. Echographic-quantified severity of mitral anulus calcification: prognostic correlation to related hemodynamic, valvular, rhythm, and conduction abnormalities. Am Heart J. 1982; 103: 222–225.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Pomerance A. Pathology of the heart with and without cardiac failure in the aged. Br Heart J. 1965; 27: 697–710.

13. Benjamin EJ, Plehn JF, D’Agostino RB, et al. Mitral annular calcification and the risk of stroke in an elderly cohort. N Engl J Med. 1992; 327: 374–379.[Abstract]

14. Kuller L, Borhani N, Furberg C, et al. Prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease and association with risk factors in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1994; 139: 1164–1179.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Wilson PW, Kauppila LI, O’Donnell CJ, et al. Abdominal aortic calcific deposits are an important predictor of vascular morbidity and mortality. Circulation. 2001; 103: 1529–1534.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. O’Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, et al. Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults: Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 14–22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Bots ML, Hoes AW, Koudstaal PJ, et al. Common carotid intima-media thickness and risk of stroke and myocardial infarction: the Rotterdam Study. Circulation. 1997; 96: 1432–1437.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Psaty BM, Furberg CD, Kuller LH, et al. Traditional risk factors and subclinical disease measures as predictors of first myocardial infarction in older adults: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Arch Intern Med. 1999; 159: 1339–1347.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Stewart BF, Siscovick D, Lind BK, et al. Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease: Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 29: 630–634.[Abstract]

20. Petty GW, Khandheria BK, Whisnant JP, et al. Predictors of cerebrovascular events and death among patients with valvular heart disease: a population-based study. Stroke. 2000; 31: 2628–2635.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Otto CM, Lind BK, Kitzman DW, et al. Association of aortic-valve sclerosis with cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in the elderly. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341: 142–147.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Boon A, Cheriex E, Lodder J, et al. Cardiac valve calcification: characteristics of patients with calcification of the mitral annulus or aortic valve. Heart. 1997; 78: 472–474.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Nair CK, Sudhakaran C, Aronow WS, et al. Clinical characteristics of patients younger than 60 years with mitral anular calcium: comparison with age- and sex-matched control subjects. Am J Cardiol. 1984; 54: 1286–1287.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Aronow WS, Schwartz KS, Koenigsberg M. Correlation of serum lipids, calcium and phosphorus, diabetes mellitus, aortic valve stenosis and history of systemic hypertension with presence or absence of mitral anular calcium in persons older than 62 years in a long-term health care facility. Am J Cardiol. 1987; 59: 381–382.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Savage DD, Garrison RJ, Castelli WP, et al. Prevalence of submitral (anular) calcium and its correlates in a general population-based sample (the Framingham Study). Am J Cardiol. 1983; 51: 1375–1378.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Dawber TR, Meadors GF, Moore FE. Epidemiologic approaches to heart disease: the Framingham study. Am J Public Health. 1951; 41: 279–286.[Free Full Text]

27. Dawber TR, Kannel WB, Lyell LP, An approach to longitudinal studies in a community: the Framingham Heart Study. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1963; 107: 539–556.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Cupples LA, D’Agostino RB, Some risk factors related to the annual incidence of cardiovascular disease and death using pooled repeated biennial measurements: Framingham Study, 30-year follow-up. In: Kannel WB, Polf PA, Garrison RJ, eds. The Framingham Heart Study: An Epidemiological Investigation of Cardiovascular Disease. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. NIH Publication 87-203, section 34. 1987.

29. Bild DE, Folsom AR, Lowe LP, et al. Prevalence and correlates of coronary calcification in black and white young adults: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21: 852–857.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Newman AB, Naydeck BL, Sutton-Tyrrell K, et al. Coronary artery calcification in older adults to age 99: prevalence and risk factors. Circulation. 2001; 104: 2679–2684.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Deleted in proof.

32. Iribarren C, Sidney S, Sternfeld B, et al. Calcification of the aortic arch: risk factors and association with coronary heart disease, stroke, and peripheral vascular disease. JAMA. 2000; 283: 2810–2815.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Wong ND, Hsu JC, Detrano RC, et al. Coronary artery calcium evaluation by electron beam computed tomography and its relation to new cardiovascular events. Am J Cardiol. 2000; 86: 495–498.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Keelan PC, Bielak LF, Ashai K, et al. Long-term prognostic value of coronary calcification detected by electron-beam computed tomography in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Circulation. 2001; 104: 412–417.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Goodman WG, Goldin J, Kuizon BD, et al. Coronary-artery calcification in young adults with end-stage renal disease who are undergoing dialysis. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 1478–1483.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Maher ER, Young G, Smyth-Walsh B, et al. Aortic and mitral valve calcification in patients with end-stage renal disease. Lancet. 1987; 2: 875–877.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

37. Blackshear JL, Pearce LA, Hart RG, et al. Aortic plaque in atrial fibrillation: prevalence, predictors, and thromboembolic implications. Stroke. 1999; 30: 834–840.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Kamensky G, Lisy L, Polak E, et al. Mitral annular calcifications and aortic plaques as predictors of increased cardiovascular mortality. J Cardiol. 2001; 37 (suppl 1): 21–26.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

39. D’Agostino RB Sr, Grundy S, Sullivan LM, et al. Validation of the Framingham coronary heart disease prediction scores: results of a multiple ethnic groups investigation. JAMA. 2001; 286: 180–187.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Aronow WS, Schwartz KS, Koenigsberg M. Correlation of atrial fibrillation with presence or absence of mitral anular calcium in 604 persons older than 60 years. Am J Cardiol. 1987; 59: 1213–1214.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

41. Aronow WS, Ahn C, Kronzon I. Association of mitral annular calcium and of aortic cuspal calcium with coronary artery disease in older patients. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 84: 1084–1085.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
N. Papadopoulos, M. Dietrich, T. Christodoulou, A. Moritz, and M. Doss
Midterm Survival After Decalcification of the Mitral Annulus
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2009; 87(4): 1143 - 1147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
M. R. Akram, T. Chan, S. McAuliffe, and A. Chenzbraun
Non-rheumatic annular mitral stenosis: prevalence and characteristics
Eur J Echocardiogr, January 1, 2009; 10(1): 103 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
N E MANGHAT, V RACHAPALLI, R V. LINGEN, A M VEITCH, C A ROOBOTTOM, and G J MORGAN-HUGHES
Imaging the heart valves using ECG-gated 64-detector row cardiac CT
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2008; 81(964): 275 - 290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. N. Bella, W. Tang, A. Kraja, D. C. Rao, S. C. Hunt, M. B. Miller, V. Palmieri, M. J. Roman, D. W. Kitzman, A. Oberman, et al.
Genome-Wide Linkage Mapping for Valve Calcification Susceptibility Loci in Hypertensive Sibships: The Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network Study
Hypertension, March 1, 2007; 49(3): 453 - 460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
R. C. Johnson, J. A. Leopold, and J. Loscalzo
Vascular Calcification: Pathobiological Mechanisms and Clinical Implications
Circ. Res., November 10, 2006; 99(10): 1044 - 1059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. A. Allison, P. Cheung, M. H. Criqui, R. D. Langer, and C. M. Wright
Mitral and Aortic Annular Calcification Are Highly Associated With Systemic Calcified Atherosclerosis
Circulation, February 14, 2006; 113(6): 861 - 866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
C. S. Fox, M. G. Larson, R. S. Vasan, C.-Y. Guo, H. Parise, D. Levy, E. P. Leip, C. J. O'Donnell, R. B. D'Agostino Sr., and E. J. Benjamin
Cross-Sectional Association of Kidney Function with Valvular and Annular Calcification: The Framingham Heart Study
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2006; 17(2): 521 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
E.A. de Vrey, A.J.H.A. Scholte, X.H. Krauss, R.A. Dion, D. Poldermans, E.E. van der Wall, and J.J. Bax
Intracardiac pseudotumor caused by mitral annular calcification
Eur J Echocardiogr, January 1, 2006; 7(1): 62 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. R. Kizer, D. O. Wiebers, J. P. Whisnant, J. M. Galloway, T. K. Welty, E. T. Lee, L. G. Best, H. E. Resnick, M. J. Roman, and R. B. Devereux
Mitral Annular Calcification, Aortic Valve Sclerosis, and Incident Stroke in Adults Free of Clinical Cardiovascular Disease: The Strong Heart Study
Stroke, December 1, 2005; 36(12): 2533 - 2537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
A K Nightingale and J D Horowitz
Aortic sclerosis: not an innocent murmur but a marker of increased cardiovascular risk
Heart, November 1, 2005; 91(11): 1389 - 1393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
R. Sharma, D. Pellerin, D. C. Gaze, H. Gregson, C. P. Streather, P. O. Collinson, and S. J. D. Brecker
Dobutamine stress echocardiography and the resting but not exercise electrocardiograph predict severe coronary artery disease in renal transplant candidates
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2207 - 2214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. D. Horne, N. J. Camp, J. B. Muhlestein, and L. A. Cannon-Albright
Evidence for a Heritable Component in Death Resulting From Aortic and Mitral Valve Diseases
Circulation, November 9, 2004; 110(19): 3143 - 3148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
C. M. Otto
Why is aortic sclerosis associated with adverse clinical outcomes?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 21, 2004; 43(2): 176 - 178.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
107/11/1492    most recent
01.CIR.0000058168.26163.BCv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fox, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Benjamin, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fox, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Benjamin, E. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valvular heart disease
Right arrow Echocardiography
Right arrow Epidemiology