Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2002;106:788-792
Published online before print July 8, 2002, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000025586.89221.4B
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
106/7/788    most recent
01.CIR.0000025586.89221.4Bv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Sauvage Nolting, P. R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Sauvage Nolting, P. R. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lipid and lipoprotein metabolism
Right arrow Risk Factors

(Circulation. 2002;106:788.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Elevated Remnant-Like Particles in Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Response to Statin Therapy

Pernette R. W. de Sauvage Nolting, MD; Marcel B. Twickler, MD; Geesje M. Dallinga-Thie, PhD; Rudolf J.A. Buirma, MD; Barbara A. Hutten, PhD; John J.P. Kastelein, MD, PhD, for the Examination of Probands and Relatives in Statin Studies with Familial Hypercholesterolemia (ExPRESS) Study Group

From the Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center (P.R.W.d.S.N., B.A.H., J.J.P.K.), Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center (M.B.T., G.M.D.-T.), Utrecht, the Netherlands; and Merck, Sharp and Dohme (R.J.A.B.), Clinical Research, Haarlem, the Netherlands.

Correspondence to P.R.W. de Sauvage Nolting, MD, Academic Medical Center, G1-114. Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands. E-mail p.desauvagenolting{at}amc.uva.nl


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Remnant lipoproteins (RLP-C) are considered important in atherogenesis. Hence, this study was designed to assess RLP-C levels and the effect of statin therapy in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Elevated RLP-C levels have been associated with the presence and progression of atherosclerotic disease, and their presence in FH patients has been proposed but never established in a large cohort, nor has their response to statin therapy been confirmed.

Methods and Results— FH patients were recruited from 36 lipid clinics. After a washout period of 6 weeks, all patients were started on monotherapy with 80 mg of simvastatin for 2 years. RLP-C levels were assessed by an immune-separation assay. In 327 FH patients, RLP-C measurements could be performed before and after treatment. Mean total cholesterol (10.55±2.17 mmol/L), mean LDL cholesterol (8.40±2.13 mmol/L), and median RLP-C (0.47 mmol/L) levels were all severely elevated at baseline. After treatment, RLP-C levels were reduced by 49% (0.24 mmol/L; P<0.0001). Even patients with normal triglyceride levels had elevated RLP-C levels at baseline, and those with high RLP-C levels were generally characterized by a very atherogenic lipoprotein profile.

Conclusions— Baseline RLP-C levels are severely elevated in FH patients and are reduced by simvastatin but do not return to normal. These elevated RLP-C levels could be the consequence of impaired function of the LDL receptor in FH. RLP-C levels in FH contribute to an atherogenic lipoprotein profile and could identify patients who require additional treatment.


Key Words: hypercholesterolemia • lipids • lipoproteins • atherosclerosis


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant disorder of lipoprotein metabolism.1 Mutations in the LDL receptor gene are the cause of this disease and lead to a reduction in the clearance of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), which causes a rise in LDL-C levels and predisposes to the development of atherosclerosis.2 Therefore, FH patients are at great risk of developing premature coronary artery disease. However, there is a wide variation of coronary risk among FH patients.3

Increasing experimental and clinical evidence suggests that triglyceride (TG)-rich lipoproteins, and in particular remnant-like particles (RLPs), contribute to atherogenesis and consequently to cardiovascular disease progression. High levels of remnant lipoproteins of both hepatic (VLDL) and intestinal (chylomicron) origin are associated with the progression of coronary atherosclerosis.47 In a study by Phillips et al,7 it was found that neither LDL-C nor TG levels correlate well with lesion progression or clinical events. TG-rich lipoprotein remnant levels, however, did correlate with both lesion progression and cardiac events. Recently, Nakajima et al810 developed a simple technique to analyze RLP cholesterol (RLP-C) using an immune-affinity gel containing anti-apolipoprotein (apo) A-I and anti-apoB100 monoclonal antibodies. This unique anti-apoB100 monoclonal antibody was shown to recognize apoB100 in LDL and most VLDL but not in apoE-enriched VLDL, whereas anti-apoA-I recognizes and binds all HDL particles. This technique isolates apoE-rich VLDL particles containing apoB100 together with chylomicron remnants containing apoB48, neither of which binds to the immunoaffinity gel. Increased levels of these remnant particles have been associated with the presence and progression of cardiovascular disease and with endothelial dysfunction.1118 However, these previous results were examined in non-FH patients. Evidently, these patients have a different lipid profile from the extremely elevated LDL-C levels seen in FH patients. Therefore, this association between elevated levels of RLP-C and cardiovascular disease cannot be extra- polated to FH patients as such.

Levels of remnant particles could be relevant for the understanding of the heterogeneity in coronary risk among FH patients. RLP-C levels have thus far not been assessed in a large FH population. To date, only 2 small studies (in 15 and 7 FH patients, respectively) reported RLP-C levels of FH patients and did indeed show increased RLP-C levels.19,20 In the present study, we aimed to assess accumulation of RLP-C and also to evaluate whether RLP-C levels would be lowered by statin therapy in a large, well-defined cohort of FH patients.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
FH Subjects
The present study is a substudy of the ExPRESS FH (Examination of Probands and Relatives in Statin Studies with Familial Hypercholesterolemia) study, in which efficacy, safety, and pharmacogenomics of simvastatin 80 mg were assessed in 526 heterozygous FH patients. For this open-label, multicenter study, FH patients were recruited from 36 lipid clinics in the Netherlands. Patients were included if they met the following criteria: all patients had to have either a molecular diagnosis for FH or were diagnosed with definite FH and had to have 6 or more points, according to an algorithm (to allow standardization of the diagnosis of FH based on clinical findings, personal and familial clinical history, and biochemical parameters)21; all patients were at least 18 years of age; and patients with a history of myocardial infarction, CABG, or PTCA could be included if the physician thought it was medically allowed for the patient to have a washout period. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant or nursing women or premenopausal women not using adequate contraceptives; had acute liver disease, hepatic dysfunction, or persistent elevations of serum transaminases; had hypersensitivity or intolerance to simvastatin or any of its components; had hyperlipidemia type I, III, IV, or V or homozygous FH; had a recent history of alcohol or drug abuse; had secondary hypercholesterolemia due to any cause; had inadequately controlled diabetes, unstable angina, or intermediate coronary syndrome, or clinically significant ventricular arrhythmia at study entry, or myocardial infarction within the past 3 months; were concurrently using erythromycin and similar drugs that affect the cytochrome P450 enzyme; or had a history of cancer.

Controls
Controls for the 327 FH patients in whom RLP-C levels were measured were recruited post hoc from their families and matched for age and sex. From these 77 individuals, we obtained demographic characteristics, lipid levels, and lipoprotein levels.

Study Design
After a washout period of 6 weeks, patients were started on monotherapy with simvastatin 80 mg. No other lipid-lowering medication was allowed. Medical history, physical examination, and additional risk factors for cardiovascular disease, as well as laboratory analysis of lipid and lipoprotein levels and routine safety parameters, were obtained from all patients. The biochemical analyses of lipid levels and safety parameters were performed in the hospitals themselves and were standardized by a virtual central laboratory. The apo determinations were performed in the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam and the RLP determinations in the University Medical Center in Utrecht. The ethics committees of all 36 centers approved the protocol, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Biochemical Analysis
Blood samples were taken in the morning after an overnight fast. Total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol (HDL-C), and TG levels were routinely determined in the different laboratories and standardized by a virtual central laboratory. LDL-C was calculated with the Friedewald formula.22 ApoA-I and apoB were determined by an immunologic rate-nephelometric procedure with a polyclonal goat anti-human antibody (Array protein system, Beckman Coulter).23

The RLP fraction was prepared by use of an immune-separation technique described by Campos et al8 and Nakajima and colleagues.9 Briefly, 5 µL of serum was added to 300 µL of mixed immunoaffinity gel suspension containing monoclonal anti-human apoA-I (H-12) and anti-human apoB100 (JI-H) antibodies (Immunoresearch Laboratories). The reaction mixture was gently shaken for 120 minutes at room temperature. After the supernatant was left standing for 15 minutes, 200 µL was withdrawn for the assay of RLP-C. Cholesterol in the RLP fraction (coefficient of variation <3%) was measured by an enzymatic assay on a Cobas Mira S autoanalyzer (ABX Diagnostics). ApoE genotyping was performed as described by Reymer et al.24

Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as mean±SD. Skewed data distributions are presented as median and interquartile range. Mean and median cholesterol levels in FH patients compared with controls were tested by the independent-sample t test and the Mann-Whitney test, respectively. Mean values in lipids and lipoproteins before and after treatment were compared with the paired-sample t test. TG and RLP-C levels were compared by nonparametric Wilcoxon test because they had a skewed distribution. Mean values in baseline characteristics and lipids for the different groups were compared with 1-way ANOVA. Parameters with a skewed distribution (TG, RLP-C, and RLP reduction) were compared with the Kruskal-Wallis test. {chi}2 tests were applied for comparison of distributions of dichotomous data (sex, presence of diabetes, and apoE2 levels). All statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS package (version 10.0.7, United Kingdom). A probability value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Among the 526 patients who participated in the ExPRESS FH study, blood samples were stored for 327 patients. Consequently, these patients were available for RLP-C analyses and composed our study group. This group did not differ from the source population with regard to baseline characteristics and lipid parameters. Age ranged from 18 to 80 years. Mean age was 47.4 years (SD ±13.2). Slightly more men (54%) than women (46%) were included. Mean body mass index (BMI) was 25.8 kg/m2 (SD ±3.6). Lifestyle and physical characteristics such as dietary adherence, BMI, alcohol intake, and physical exercise did not change over the course of the trial.

Mean lipid, lipoprotein, and RLP-C levels at baseline and 1 year after therapy with simvastatin 80 mg are shown in Table 1. As expected, mean total cholesterol levels (10.55±2.17 mmol/L) were severely elevated in FH patients compared with their family controls (4.58±0.77 mmol/L; P<0.0001), and this could largely be attributed to elevated LDL-C levels (8.40±2.13 mmol/L). Mean HDL-C levels were lower in FH patients than in controls (1.25±0.35 versus 1.39±0.38 mmol/L; P=0.04), whereas median TG levels were elevated compared with controls (1.80 versus 0.97 mmol/L; P<0.0001). Median RLP-C levels (0.47 mmol/L) were severely elevated in FH patients. Median RLP-C levels in controls were 0.20 mmol/L, which indicates that FH patients had a 2-fold elevation of RLP-C levels (P<0.0001). After simvastatin treatment, plasma cholesterol, LDL-C, TG, and apoB levels decreased, and HDL-C and apoA-I levels increased, all significantly. RLP-C levels decreased significantly from a median of 0.47 to 0.24 mmol/L (P<0.0001), which is consistent with a 49% median reduction. At baseline, only 5 FH patients (1.5%) had normal RLP-C levels (<=0.20 mmol/L); in contrast, after simvastatin therapy, 84 patients (25.7%) were below this RLP-C level.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Lipid, Lipoprotein, and RLP-C Levels in Controls and in FH Patients at Baseline and After 1 Year of Therapy

In Table 2, baseline RLP-C levels are divided into 3 equal groups by the 33rd and 66th percentiles. FH patients in the highest third were older, were more often male, had a higher BMI, and more often had diabetes. To address whether FH patients with type 2 diabetes were outliers in terms of remnant accumulation and caused significant shifts of the medians in the different groups, we calculated median RLP-C levels with these individuals included or excluded. However, results indicated no significant changes in the medians of these 3 groups (data not shown). In addition, the statistically significant increase in total cholesterol, LDL-C, and TG levels and the decrease in HDL-C illustrate the association between plasma RLP-C and the presence of a severe atherogenic lipoprotein profile. RLP-C levels were also correlated with HDL-C levels; the Spearman rank correlation coefficient was r=-0.37 at P<0.0001. In the lowest third of baseline RLP-C levels, median TG levels were normal (1.10 mmol/L), whereas in that third, median RLP-C levels were still above normal (0.32 mmol/L). Moreover, significantly more patients in the highest RLP-C tertile had an apoE2 allele compared with the 2 lower tertiles (P=0.001). Finally, RLP-C levels were more reduced in the highest tertile than in the lower tertiles. Because pretreatment and posttreatment measurements of the variable of interest were, in general, not perfectly correlated, the evaluation of treatment effects must be adjusted for regression to the mean. Chen et al25 proposed 4 models, which included either or both additive and multiplicative effects. We applied this model to evaluate RLP-C changes. The model that included both additive and multiplicative effects fit better than that with only additive effects (regression to the mean) for RLP-C change (P<0.0001). Therefore, changes in RLP-C could not be attributed to regression to the mean only but indeed exhibited a relationship with baseline levels. Of FH patients in the highest versus the lowest third of RLP-C levels, 53 (48.6%) had cardiovascular disease versus 30 (27.5%) of the cases ({chi}2=10.5, P=0.005). However, on multiple logistic regression analysis with age, sex, BMI, and major lipids in the model, this relation was no longer statistically significant (P=0.32).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Lipids, RLP, ApoE2, and Clinical Features in FH Patients With Baseline RLP-C Levels Divided in 3 Equal Groups

Table 3 shows the data stratified according to baseline TG levels in quartiles. Patients in the lowest quartile had completely normal median baseline TG levels (0.90 mmol/L); however, the corresponding RLP-C levels were already strongly elevated (0.32 mmol/L), whereas plasma LDL-C levels were similar in all groups (P=0.09).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Lipids and RLP-C Levels in FH Patients With Baseline TG Levels Divided in Quartiles


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
RLP-C Increase at Baseline
In the present study, we observed that median RLP-C levels in FH patients were severely elevated compared with their siblings (0.47 versus 0.20 mmol/L; P<0.0001). Elevated RLP-C levels were reported before in FH patients, albeit in very small cohorts. Twickler et al20 measured RLP-C levels in 7 FH patients and found significantly elevated mean RLP-C levels compared with 7 controls (42.10 mg/dL [1.09 mmol/L] versus 7.49 mg/dL [0.19 mmol/L]; P<0.01). Dane-Stewart et al19 also found elevated median RLP-C levels in 15 FH patients compared with 15 controls (16.2 mg/dL [0.42 mmol/L] versus 8.5 mg/dL [0.22 mmol/L]; P=0.003). In the present cohort, mean age and BMI increased from the lowest to the highest RLP-C tertiles. Why RLP levels rise with age is unknown, but older people have higher BMIs, often combined with higher TG levels. This association points to increased synthesis of VLDL, which could lead to higher RLP levels.26 We also found a higher prevalence of apoE2 allele carriers in the highest RLP-C tertile. ApoE is the major ligand for hepatic lipoprotein receptors and mediates chylomicron and VLDL remnant uptake.27 ApoE2 is 1 of the 3 E isoforms and exhibits a very low affinity to the LDL receptor.28 It is therefore not unexpected to find more apoE2 alleles in the highest third of RLP-C levels. The apoE allele distribution was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium ({chi}2=3.59, P>0.1) in our FH sample, but the frequency of the {epsilon}-2 allele was lower than previously reported in the general Dutch population (0.047 and 0.082, respectively).29 It is therefore unlikely that an overrepresentation of the {epsilon}-2 allele of the apoE gene contributed to our findings.

These elevated RLP-C levels might play an important role, in addition to elevated LDL-C levels, in the acceleration of atherosclerosis in FH. This idea is supported by the findings of Karpe et al,17 who did not find an association between LDL-C and new lesions in vein grafts in 395 patients with coronary artery disease but did find a strong trend for higher RLP-C concentrations.

RLP-C Reduction After Statin Intervention
RLP-C levels are significantly decreased by simvastatin. Median RLP-C levels almost returned to normal but remained slightly elevated. This observation was reported previously in 7 FH patients.20 Recently, 2 studies in patients with combined dyslipidemia showed similar results.30,31 Stein et al30 found that median elevated RLP-C levels of 0.34 mmol/L were reduced by simvastatin 20 mg (6.0%) and by atorvastatin 10 mg (25.9%) but not by pravastatin 40 mg in 22 patients in a crossover study. In addition, Sasaki et al31 found that atorvastatin 10 to 20 mg reduced RLP-C levels from 0.31 to 0.16 mmol/L. These studies also illustrate a treatment effect of statins on the RLP-C fraction.

Accumulation as the Proposed Mechanism
The central abnormality in heterozygous FH is an impaired function of the LDL receptor. As a consequence, plasma levels of LDL-C are severely elevated, as are levels of RLP-C. Moreover, these elevated RLP-C levels are significantly reduced by simvastatin treatment. Statins likely improve RLP clearance by upregulating LDL receptors and by decreasing hepatic VLDL synthesis.32,33 Both mechanisms lead to less competition for the clearance mechanisms shared by chylomicrons and VLDL.34 The reductions in apoB and LDL-C were very consistent with those of RLP-C, as is anticipated, because by upregulating the LDL (apoB, E) receptor, all apoB (LDL)- and apoE (RLP-C)-containing lipoproteins will be reduced in essentially similar proportions.

The raised TG levels in the higher RLP-C tertiles support the accumulation of TG-rich lipoproteins. The conclusion could therefore be drawn that TG levels measured in FH patients primarily reflect atherogenic remnant lipoproteins. However, even patients with normal TG levels had elevated RLP-C levels. This observation was also made previously.20 All these data indicate the presence of remnant particle accumulation in FH patients, irrespective of concomitant TG elevation. Likewise, stratification of the data according to baseline TG into quartiles resulted in an association between TG and RLP-C levels, but LDL-C levels were equally elevated in all quartiles. This suggests that despite the fact that plasma LDL-C levels are strongly elevated in FH patients, RLP-C levels could further contribute to the atherogenic lipoprotein profile over and above LDL-C measurements. We therefore hypothesize that remnant accumulation in FH might be explained by a combination of factors, such as the LDL-receptor mutation; VLDL production associated with advancing age, central obesity, and glucose intolerance; carriership of an {epsilon}-2 allele of the apoE gene; and possibly defective LDL-receptor related protein function. These findings may raise the need to prescribe combination therapy with simvastatin 80 mg and either nicotinic acid or fenofibrate or to prescribe more powerful statins to lower the risk associated with the residual remnant increase.

In conclusion, baseline RLP-C levels are severely elevated in FH patients. Treatment with high-dose simvastatin resulted in a strong reduction of RLP-C, but in the majority of patients, RLP-C levels remained elevated. RLP-C levels in FH contribute to an atherogenic lipoprotein profile and could identify patients who require additional treatment.


*    Acknowledgments
 
The ExPRESS study was sponsored by Merck, Sharp, and Dohme, the Netherlands.

Received February 22, 2002; revision received May 21, 2002; accepted May 23, 2002.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Goldstein JL, Brown MS. Familial hypercholesterolemia.In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, et al, eds. The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease. 7th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1995: 672–712.
  2. Brown MS, Goldstein JL. A receptor-mediated pathway for cholesterol homeostasis. Science. 1986; 232: 34–47.[Free Full Text]
  3. Hoeg JM. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: a paradigm for phenotypic variation. Am J Cardiol. 1993; 72: 11D–14D.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Davignon J, Cohn JS. Triglycerides: a risk factor for coronary heart disease. Atherosclerosis. 1996; 124 (suppl): S57–S64.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Hodis HN, Mack WJ, Azen SP, et al. Triglyceride- and cholesterol-rich lipoproteins have a differential effect on mild/moderate and severe lesion progression as assessed by quantitative coronary angiography in a controlled trial of lovastatin. Circulation. 1994; 90: 42–49.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Patsch JR, Miesenbock G, Hopferwieser T, et al. Relation of triglyceride metabolism and coronary artery disease: studies in the postprandial state. Arterioscler Thromb. 1992; 12: 1336–1345.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Phillips NR, Waters D, Havel RJ. Plasma lipoproteins and progression of coronary artery disease evaluated by angiography and clinical events. Circulation. 1993; 88: 2762–2770.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Campos E, Nakajima K, Tanaka A, et al. Properties of an apolipoprotein E-enriched fraction of triglyceride- rich lipoproteins isolated from human blood plasma with a monoclonal antibody to apolipoprotein B-100. J Lipid Res. 1992; 33: 369–380.[Abstract]
  9. Nakajima K, Saito T, Tamura A, et al. Cholesterol in remnant-like lipoproteins in human serum using monoclonal anti apo B-100 and anti apo A-I immunoaffinity mixed gels. Clin Chim Acta. 1993; 223: 53–71.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Leary ET, Wang T, Baker DJ, et al. Evaluation of an immunoseparation method for quantitative measurement of remnant-like particle-cholesterol in serum and plasma. Clin Chem. 1998; 44: 2490–2498.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. McNamara JR, Shah PK, Nakajima K, et al. Remnant-like particle (RLP) cholesterol is an independent cardiovascular disease risk factor in women: results from the Framingham Heart Study. Atherosclerosis. 2001; 154: 229–236.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Masuoka H, Kamei S, Ozaki M, et al. Predictive value of remnant-like particle cholesterol as an indicator of coronary artery stenosis in patients with normal serum triglyceride levels. Intern Med. 2000; 39: 540–546.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Masuoka H, Kamei S, Wagayama H, et al. Association of remnant-like particle cholesterol with coronary artery disease in patients with normal total cholesterol levels. Am Heart J. 2000; 139: 305–310.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Kugiyama K, Doi H, Takazoe K, et al. Remnant lipoprotein levels in fasting serum predict coronary events in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1999; 99: 2858–2860.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kugiyama K, Doi H, Motoyama T, et al. Association of remnant lipoprotein levels with impairment of endothelium-dependent vasomotor function in human coronary arteries. Circulation. 1998; 97: 2519–2526.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Karpe F, Boquist S, Tang R, et al. Remnant lipoproteins are related to intima-media thickness of the carotid artery independently of LDL cholesterol and plasma triglycerides. J Lipid Res. 2001; 42: 17–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Karpe F, Taskinen M, Nieminen MS, et al. Remnant-like lipoprotein particle cholesterol concentration and progression of coronary and vein-graft atherosclerosis in response to gemfibrozil treatment. Atherosclerosis. 2001; 157: 181–187.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Takeichi S, Yukawa N, Nakajima Y, et al. Association of plasma triglyceride-rich lipoprotein remnants with coronary atherosclerosis in cases of sudden cardiac death. Atherosclerosis. 1999; 142: 309–315.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Dane-Stewart CA, Watts GF, Mamo JC, et al. Elevated apolipoprotein B-48 and remnant-like particle-cholesterol in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. Eur J Clin Invest. 2001; 31: 113–117.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Twickler TB, Dallinga-Thie GM, de Valk HW, et al. High dose of simvastatin normalizes postprandial remnant-like particle response in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20: 2422–2427.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Defesche JC. Familial hypercholesterolemia.In: Betteridge DJ, ed. Lipids and Vascular Disease. London, UK: Martin Dunitz; 2000: 65–76.
  22. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972; 18: 499–502.[Abstract]
  23. Marcovina SM, Albers JJ, Dati F, et al. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry standardization project for measurements of apolipoproteins A-I and B. Clin Chem. 1991; 37: 1676–1682.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Reymer PW, Groenemeyer BE, van de Burg R, et al. Apolipoprotein E genotyping on agarose gels. Clin Chem. 1995; 41: 1046–1047.[Free Full Text]
  25. Chen S, Cox C, Cui L. A more flexible regression-to-the-mean model with possible stratification. Biometrics. 1998; 54: 939–947.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Howard BV, Abbott WG, Beltz WF, et al. Integrated study of low density lipoprotein metabolism and very low density lipoprotein metabolism in non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Metabolism. 1987; 36: 870–877.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Rall SC Jr, Mahley RW. The role of apolipoprotein E genetic variants in lipoprotein disorders. J Intern Med. 1992; 231: 653–659.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Davignon J, Gregg RE, Sing CF. Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and atherosclerosis. Arteriosclerosis. 1988; 8: 1–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Smit M, de Knijff P, Rosseneu M, et al. Apolipoprotein E polymorphism in The Netherlands and its effect on plasma lipid and apolipoprotein levels. Hum Genet. 1988; 80: 287–292.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Stein DT, Devaraj S, Balis D, et al. Effect of statin therapy on remnant lipoprotein cholesterol levels in patients with combined hyperlipidemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21: 2026–2031.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Sasaki S, Kuwahara N, Kunitomo K, et al. Effects of atorvastatin on oxidized low-density lipoprotein, low- density lipoprotein subfraction distribution, and remnant lipoprotein in patients with mixed hyperlipoproteinemia. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 89: 386–389.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Berglund L, Witztum JL, Galeano NF, et al. Three-fold effect of lovastatin treatment on low density lipoprotein metabolism in subjects with hyperlipidemia: increase in receptor activity, decrease in apoB production, and decrease in particle affinity for the receptor: results from a novel triple-tracer approach. J Lipid Res. 1998; 39: 913–924.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Cianflone K, Bilodeau M, Davignon J, et al. Modulation of chylomicron remnant metabolism by an hepatic hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor. Metabolism. 1990; 39: 274–280.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Brunzell JD, Hazzard WR, Porte D Jr, et al. Evidence for a common, saturable, triglyceride removal mechanism for chylomicrons and very low density lipoproteins in man. J Clin Invest. 1973; 52: 1578–1585.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
T.B. Twickler, G.M. Dallinga-Thie, J.S. Cohn, and M.J. Chapman
Elevated Remnant-Like Particle Cholesterol Concentration: A Characteristic Feature of the Atherogenic Lipoprotein Phenotype
Circulation, April 27, 2004; 109(16): 1918 - 1925.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. T.B. Twickler, M.-J. M. Cramer, H. P.F. Koppeschaar, J. Malik, T. Stulc, R. Ceska, E. Conti, F. Crea, F. Andreotti, A. Juul, et al.
Unraveling Reaven's Syndrome X: Serum Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I and Cardiovascular Disease * Response
Circulation, May 27, 2003; 107 (20): e190 - e192.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
106/7/788    most recent
01.CIR.0000025586.89221.4Bv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Sauvage Nolting, P. R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Sauvage Nolting, P. R. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lipid and lipoprotein metabolism
Right arrow Risk Factors