(Circulation. 2002;106:e21.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.
Correspondence |
Cardiovascular Diseases and Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
To the Editor:
The magnetic resonance angiogram of the left hand shown by Wiesmann et al1 is an incomplete display of the arteries that is further confounded by venous contamination. From this image, one cannot conclude that "there is no evidence of vasculitis or arterial stenosis or occlusion." Spatial resolution of a fraction of a millimeter is required to diagnose vasculitis in the hand. Only conventional angiography, usually with intraarterial vasodilators, provides the required spatial resolution.
References
1. Weismann F, Beer M, Krause U, et al. Clubbing due to peripheral hypervascularization: recognition by contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography. Circulation. 2001; 104: 2503.
Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Würzburg, Germany
Institut für Röntgendiagnostik, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
Drs McPhail and Stanson raise an important issue with regard to our article.1 We agree that technical improvements regarding coil and pulse program design will help increase the diagnostic accuracy of MRI and particularly magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). In this respect, recent methodological developments have shown significant improvements concerning spatial and temporal resolution for 3D MR visualization of vascular malformation of the hand.24
It is known that detection of vasculitis of the small arteries cannot exclusively be based on contrast-enhanced MRA. Therefore, we performed multiple laboratory tests in our patient, including white blood cell count differentiation, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and vasculitis-associated antibody search. All showed normal results. Hence, given these combined results, there was no evidence of vasculitis from any of the performed diagnostic procedures.
MRA of this patients left hand, however, showed significant hypervascularization in the terminal digits, which is known to be associated with clubbing.5 The image shown in the current report1 was acquired in a late arterial phase after contrast injection. Absence of vasculitis or arterial stenosis or occlusion was diagnosed on additional images that were acquired in an earlier arterial phase not shown in the report.
Our main motivation for this case report was to demonstrate the future potential of MRA for non-invasive insight in vascular disease. However, we agree that because of the given limitations of spatial resolution of MRA, conventional x-ray angiography is the current gold-standard for detailed visualization and diagnosis of vascular morphology.
References
1. Wiesmann F, Beer M, Krause U, et al. Clubbing due to peripheral hypervascularization: recognition by contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography. Circulation. 2001; 104: 2503.
2. Goldfarb JW, Hochman MG, Kim DS, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography and perfusion imaging of the hand. Am J Roentgenol. 2001; 177: 11771182.
3. Disa JJ, Chung KC, Gellad FE, et al. Efficacy of magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of vascular malformations of the hand. Plast Recontr Surg. 1997; 99: 136144.
4. Holder LE, Merine DS, Yang A. Nuclear medicine, contrast angiography, and magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating vascular problems in the hand. Hand Clin. 1993; 9: 85113.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Jajic I, Krstulovic B, Kovacivic D, et al. Primary hypertrophic osteoarthropathy (PHO) and changes in the joints: clinical, x-ray, scintigraphic, arteriographic and histologic examination of 19 patients. Scand J Rheumatol. 1980; 9: 9896.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2002 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |