Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2002;106:2842-2847
Published online before print November 11, 2002, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000044020.27990.32
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
106/22/2842    most recent
01.CIR.0000044020.27990.32v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lanza, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wickline, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lanza, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wickline, S. A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*DOXORUBICIN
*OLEIC ACID
*TAXOL
Related Collections
Right arrow Restenosis
Right arrow Cardiovascular imaging agents/Techniques
Right arrow Smooth muscle proliferation and differentiation
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Other Research

(Circulation. 2002;106:2842.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Basic Science Reports

Targeted Antiproliferative Drug Delivery to Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells With a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Nanoparticle Contrast Agent

Implications for Rational Therapy of Restenosis

Gregory M. Lanza, MD, PhD; Xin Yu, ScD; Patrick M. Winter, PhD; Dana R. Abendschein, PhD; Kerry K. Karukstis, PhD; Michael J. Scott, BS; Lori K. Chinen, MS; Ralph W. Fuhrhop; David E. Scherrer, MS; Samuel A. Wickline, MD

From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Washington University Medical School, St Louis, Mo (G.M.L., X.Y., P.M.W., D.R.A., M.J.S., L.K.C., R.W.F., D.E.S., S.A.W.), and the Department of Chemistry, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, Calif (K.K.K.).

Correspondence to Gregory M. Lanza, MD, PhD, Division of Cardiology, Washington University, 660 S Euclid Blvd—Campus Box 8086, St Louis, MO 63110. E-mail greg{at}soundlab.wustl.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Restenosis is a serious complication of coronary angioplasty that involves the proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) from the media to the intima, synthesis of extracellular matrix, and remodeling. We have previously demonstrated that tissue factor–targeted nanoparticles can penetrate and bind stretch-activated vascular smooth muscles in the media after balloon injury. In the present study, the concept of VSMC-targeted nanoparticles as a drug-delivery platform for the prevention of restenosis after angioplasty is studied.

Methods and Results— Tissue factor–targeted nanoparticles containing doxorubicin or paclitaxel at 0, 0.2, or 2.0 mole% of the outer lipid layer were targeted for 30 minutes to VSMCs and significantly inhibited their proliferation in culture over the next 3 days. Targeting of the nanoparticles to VSMC surface epitopes significantly increased nanoparticle antiproliferative effectiveness, particularly for paclitaxel. In vitro dissolution studies revealed that nanoparticle drug release persisted over one week. Targeted antiproliferative results were dependent on the hydrophobic nature of the drug and noncovalent interactions with other surfactant components. Molecular imaging of nanoparticles adherent to the VSMC was demonstrated with high-resolution T1-weighted MRI at 4.7T. MRI 19F spectroscopy of the nanoparticle core provided a quantifiable approach for noninvasive dosimetry of targeted drug payloads.

Conclusions— These data suggest that targeted paramagnetic nanoparticles may provide a novel, MRI-visualizable, and quantifiable drug delivery system for the prevention of restenosis after angioplasty.


Key Words: restenosis • drugs • magnetic resonance imaging


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Restenosis is a serious complication of coronary angioplasty that involves the proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) from the media to the intima, the synthesis of extracellular matrix, and remodeling.1,2 Early local administration of numerous therapeutic agents into injured vessel walls poorly inhibited smooth muscle cell proliferation.312 Recently, newer stent-based drug-delivery systems, particularly devices incorporating hydrophobic antiproliferative agents, have been successful in the clinic.1315 These promising results indicate that local deposition and prolonged release of appropriate antiproliferative agents can effectively ameliorate restenosis. These results highlight an opportunity for drug-delivery systems that achieve similar prolonged release of appropriate therapeutics directly within the tunica media to provide effective antirestenotic treatment, particularly in vessels less amenable to stent therapy.

Ligand-directed nanoparticles are a novel, site-specific agent that can be administered locally and can penetrate into the tunica media via microfractures created by balloon overstretch injury. We have demonstrated that tissue factor (TF)–targeted nanoparticles specifically bind with high avidity to smooth muscle cell membranes in vivo16,17 and may be readily detected with intravascular ultrasound. Targeted nanoparticles bound to medial smooth muscle cells could also provide a unique vehicle to deliver antiproliferative chemotherapeutic agents, like those eluting off stents in the lumen, directly within the balloon-injured vascular wall.

In the present study, the potential of site-directed nanoparticles to incorporate and deliver potent lipophilic antiproliferative agents with different water solubilities, ie, doxorubicin (highly water soluble) and paclitaxel (poorly water soluble), is studied. Moreover, the unique potential to utilize T1-weighted MRI to visualize nanoparticle delivery and the opportunity to quantify local drug dosimetry with 19fluorine spectroscopy are demonstrated. Collectively, these experiments illustrate that targeted therapeutic nanoparticles could provide visualizable and quantifiable therapy to prevent restenosis after percutaneous revascularization.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Preparation of Perfluorocarbon Nanoparticles
A biotinylated perfluorocarbon contrast agent was produced for in vitro studies by incorporating biotinylated phosphatidylethanolamine (Avanti Polar Lipids) into the outer lipid monolayer of a perfluorocarbon microemulsion.18 A 2% lipid surfactant comixture included doxorubicin (DXR) or paclitaxel (Taxol, Sigma Chemical Co) at concentrations of 0.0 mole%, 0.2 mole%, or 2.0 mole% and gadolinium diethylene-triamine-pentaacetic acid-bis-oleate (Gd-DTPA-BOA) at concentrations of 0 mole% or 20 mole% (Gateway Specialty Chemicals). The surfactant comixture of lecithin (Pharmacia Inc), cholesterol (Sigma Chemical Co), Gd-DTPA-BOA, and biotinylated phosphatidylethanolamine (1 mole%) was dissolved in chloroform, evaporated under reduced pressure, dried in a 50°C vacuum oven, and dispersed into water by sonication. The suspension was combined with perfluorooctylbromide (Gateway Specialty Chemicals), safflower oil, and distilled, deionized water and was continuously processed at 20 000 PSI for 4 minutes with an S110 Microfluidics emulsifier (Microfluidics). With the use of a laser light-scattering submicron particle size analyzer (Malvern Instruments), particle sizes were determined in triplicate at 37°C to be nominally around 250 nm for the treated and control emulsions.

TF Antibody
A polyclonal antibody to the extracellular domain of recombinant porcine TF (derived from E coli), residues 1 to 208 (molecular weight, 22.8 kDa), was generated in rabbits (by Eser Tolunay, Monsanto Company, St Louis, Mo). The antibodies were purified by application to a Hi-Trap Protein G column (Pharmacia Biotech), equilibrated, and washed with 20 mmol/L sodium phosphate at pH 7.0. The antibody was eluted with 0.1 mol/L glycine-HCl at pH 2.7 and neutralized with 1 mol/L Tris buffer at pH 9.0.

VSMC Proliferation Assays
In general, porcine aortic smooth muscle cells grown in Clonetics smooth muscle basal media as previously reported17 were incubated for 2 days and then exposed to treatments (below) for 30 minutes. Unbound nanoparticles and unabsorbed drug were washed from wells, and cultures were grown to {approx}85% confluence (ie, about 3 days). Attached viable cell numbers were counted. In experiment 1, VSMCs (n=9/treatment) were exposed sequentially to excess biotinylated anti-TF antibody, avidin (Pierce Chemical Co), and then biotinylated DXR nanoparticles that incorporated 0.0 mole%, 0.2 mole% or 2.0 mole% DXR into the outer 2% (wt/vol) surfactant layer. Positive control groups were exposed to equivalent amounts of DXR in buffer.

VSMCs were also grown on glass coverslips and treated with 0.0 mole% or 2.0 mole% DXR nanoparticles for histochemistry. Smooth muscle cells were stained with a routine hematoxylin-eosin procedure or for {alpha}-smooth muscle actin with a rhodamine-phalloidin immunofluorescence technique (Molecular Probes Inc).

In experiment 2, VSMCs (n=9 per treatment) were similarly treated with TF-targeted or nontargeted paclitaxel nanoparticles incorporating 0.0 mole%, 0.2 mole%, or 2.0 mole% paclitaxel. Unbound nanoparticles were washed from the VSMC culture wells. Attached viable cell numbers were counted as above and a subset of cultures was then filled with 2% agarose and stacked for MR imaging.

In experiment 3, VSMCs (n=9/treatment) were similarly treated with TF-targeted or nontargeted DXR nanoparticles incorporating 0.0 mole%, 0.2 mole%, or 2.0 mole% DXR. Unbound nanoparticles were washed from the VSMC culture wells. Attached viable cell numbers were counted as above.

Dissolution Assays
The duration of paclitaxel and DXR release in vitro was estimated from dissolution studies. Duplicate samples of drug-laden nanoparticles containing 2 mole% paclitaxel (400 µg/mL nanoparticles) or 2 mole% DXR (353 µg/mL nanoparticles) were dialyzed with continuous agitation at 37°C using Spectra/Por regenerated cellulose membranes with 60K MWCO against a sink volume of 0.9% saline (ie, supplemented with 0.2 mg/mL human serum albumin). Free drug concentrations within the media were analyzed in duplicate with reverse-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) methodologies for one week with complete replacement of the media daily to maintain sink conditions.

HPLC Analysis of Paclitaxel and DXR
Paclitaxel was determined by reversed-phase HPLC system using an absorbance detector measuring at 227 nm employing an acetonitrile (ACN) gradient (50% to 73%) to ensure the elution of lipophilic compounds (flow rate of 1 mL/min, column temperature 35°C).19

DXR was analyzed by reversed-phase HPLC with a Waters 474 fluorescence detector at lex470/lem555.20 A Vydac C18 reversed-phase Multi-Ring, 4.6x250 mm column with a mobile phase consisting of methanol and 0.01 mol/L phosphate buffer (65:35, v/v), pH adjusted to 2.96 with 19 mol/L potassium hydroxide was employed. The flow rate was 1 mL/min at ambient temperature.

MRI of VSMC Culture
MRI of the targeted and untargeted cells was performed at 4.7 T on a Varian INOVA system (Varian Associates). Spin-echo proton images were acquired with the use of a 3-cm custom-designed birdcage coil. Sagittal T1-weighted spin-echo images of the plating wells were acquired. Imaging parameters were: TR, 150 ms; TE, 30 ms; FOV, 4x4 cm; data matrix, 512x256; slice thickness, 1 mm, yielding an in-plane resolution of 156x156 µm. 19F signal was measured at 4.7 T by 19F MRI with the use of a 1.5-cm single-turn solenoid coil, dual-tuned to 1H and 19F. The imaging parameters were: TR/TE/{alpha}, 5 s/6.3 ms/90°; FOV 2 cmx2 cmx1 mm; image matrix 256 by 256.

19Fluorine Spectroscopy
Paramagnetic nanoparticles containing 0 mole% or 20 mole% Gd-DTPA were diluted serially from 50% to 1%. The 19F signal intensity of each dilution was measured spectroscopically at 0.47T on a Bruker MQ20 Minispec NMR Analyzer (Bruker Optics, Inc) and quantified with regard to reagent grade perfluorooctylbromide.

Statistical Analysis
VSMC proliferation data (ie, cells counts) were analyzed as a completely randomized block design (SAS Inc). Means for specific a priori hypotheses were tested with least significant difference procedure (P<0.05). Fluorine spectroscopy data were analyzed with general linear regression.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
TF-Targeted Drug Delivery
In experiment 1 the concept for local drug delivery was established. VSMCs were treated with TF-targeted nanoparticles containing 0.0 mole%, 0.2 mole%, and 2.0 mole% DXR or an equivalent amount of drug in buffer alone. After 30 minutes of exposure, washout, and 3 days further growth, the cellular proliferation of the control group was >85% confluent, and cells exhibited normal morphology and cytoskeletal architecture (Figure 1). Treatment with targeted DXR nanoparticles dramatically decreased the proliferation of smooth muscle cells and disrupted the {alpha}-smooth muscle actin cytoskeleton of many surviving cells (Figure 1).



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Routine H&E and immunostaining of {alpha}-smooth muscle actin cytoskeleton of VSMC exposed to control (0.0 mole%) (A, C) and TF-targeted (2.0 mole%) (B, D) DXR nanoparticles, respectively.

Three days after the 30-minute exposure, the antiproliferative effects of the targeted DXR and control nanoparticles and free DXR were quantified. As a percent of the control cell counts, DXR impaired cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 2). At the higher DXR dosage, cell counts decreased by more than half in both the free drug and targeted therapeutic nanoparticle groups. At the lower chemotherapeutic dosage, free DXR mildly decreased cell proliferation (P>0.05), but the targeted DXR nanoparticles markedly decreased cell counts (P<0.05) by {approx}40%. Thus, DXR incorporated into targeted nanoparticles manifest enhanced effectiveness as compared with free drug.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Percent cell counts of VSMCs 3 days after exposure to 0.0 mole%, 0.2 mole%, or 2.0 mole% TF-targeted DXR nanoparticles or equivalent free DXR in media.

In a second series of studies, paclitaxel or DXR, at 0.0 mole%, 0.2 mole%, or 2.0 mole%, was incorporated into the surfactant layer of the nanoparticles (Figure 3). In contradistinction to the first experiment, VSMC cultures were exposed to control or drug-containing nanoparticles that were ligand-targeted to TF or nontargeted (lacking ligands to TF). In each set of experiments, control nanoparticles, whether targeted or untargeted, exhibited no effect on smooth muscle cell proliferation. TF-targeting to VSMCs of either DXR or paclitaxel nanoparticles increased (P<0.05) antiproliferative effectiveness relative to nontargeted formulations. Nontargeted paclitaxel nanoparticles exhibited no effect on cell proliferation, whereas, nontargeted DXR nanoparticles decreased VSMC proliferation but less (P<0.05) than their targeted counterparts. The probable basis for the antiproliferative effect of the nontargeted DXR nanoparticles was reflected in the relative dissolution release profiles of the two formulations.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Top, Percent cell counts of VSMCs 3 days after exposure to 0.0 mole%, 0.2 mole%, or 2.0 mole% of nontargeted or TF-targeted DXR nanoparticles. Bottom, Percent cell counts of VSMCs 3 days after exposure to 0.0 mole%, 0.2 mole%, or 2.0 mole% of nontargeted or TF-targeted paclitaxel nanoparticles.

Dissolution Studies
The majority ({approx}75%) of DXR incorporated into the lipid membrane was noncovalently associated with surfactant components and released very slowly over seven days (Figure 4, top). However, {approx}25% of the DXR payload was poorly retained within the nanoparticle and diffused out rapidly during the first day of dissolution. Paclitaxel did not have marked early release but rather emerged steadily from the nanoparticles at a rate of 9% per day over the seven-day study (Figure 4, bottom).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Top, Cumulative percent DXR release from nanoparticles (2.0 mole%) in dissolution over 7 days at 37°C. Bottom, Cumulative percent paclitaxel release from nanoparticles (2.0 mole%) in dissolution over 7 days at 37°C. Standard errors (not shown) were <1% of injected dosage for both compounds at each time point.

High-Resolution MRI
Unlike other drug-delivery systems, the nanoparticles have inherent acoustic reflectivity when bound to a surface18 and provide a prominent T1-weighted MR signal when formulated with gadolinium.2123 In the next experiment, TF-targeted or nontargeted paclitaxel nanoparticles were presented to VSMCs in culture as previously described. The incorporation of drug into the surfactant layer did not impact the paramagnetic payload capacity of the nanoparticles, which easily incorporated more than 50 000+ surface Gd-DTPA complexes each. Magnetic resonance images obtained at 4.7T clearly reveal that paramagnetic nanoparticles targeted to a monolayer of cells could be readily detected with T1-weighted spin-echo imaging despite a >100-fold partial volume dilution effect (Figure 5, bottom). Image intensity of the nanoparticle targeted VSMCs increased nearly 2-fold (0.062±0.004) as compared with nontargeted cells (0.032±0.002) (Figure 5, top).



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. MRI images of agarose-filled culture wells of VSMC monolayers exposed to buffer alone (BUFFER, left), TF-targeted nanoparticles (TF-NP, middle), and nontargeted nanoparticles (CTRL NP, right). The curve at the top presents the signal intensity profile across the stacked culture wells obtained from the region of interest depicted by the red line. The MRI image of the wells is transposed to align the signal intensity curve directly with the image. Red arrows align the VSMC monolayer position with the signal intensity profile above. Note that signal intensity is doubled at the base of the middle well because of the contrast enhancement imparted by TF-targeted paramagnetic nanoparticle binding. The signal-enhanced region only spans one or two pixels at the bottom of the well corresponding to the monolayer of VSMCs.

Fluorine Quantification of TF-Targeted Nanoparticles
In addition, the presence of the nanoparticles bound to the cell surface was verified by detection of the fluorine signal with MR spectroscopy (Figure 6, top). This unique feature of targeted perfluorocarbon nanoparticles allows high-resolution MRI detection of the nanoparticles at the target site to be confirmed by independent colocalization of the fluorine signal, potentially eliminating confusion with other tissue components or spurious artifacts. Moreover, the fluorine signal amplitude (0.47T) was unaffected by the presence of surface gadolinium and was linearly correlated to perfluorocarbon concentration, which by direct inference could be related to nanoparticle number (Figure 6, bottom).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. A, Fluorine NMR spectrum from TF-targeted perfluoroctylbromide (PFOB: C8F17Br) nanoparticles bound to VSMCs at 4.7 T (fluorine on C8 [a], C1 [c] and C2–7 [b]). B, Linear correlation of the amplitude of fluorine signal at 0.47 T versus serial dilutions of nanoparticle emulsion.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
We have previously reported that TF-targeted nanoparticles can specifically bind to smooth muscle cells in the tunica media of arteries after balloon overstretch injury. Deposition of nanoparticles within the media provides a unique opportunity to locally release hydrophobic antiproliferative agents, such as those successfully employed on eluting stents. In the present study, nanoparticles incorporating DXR, a water-soluble lipophilic compound, or paclitaxel, a highly hydrophobic drug, were targeted to VSMCs in culture and significantly inhibited their proliferation. TF-targeted paclitaxel nanoparticles with large payloads of paramagnetic chelates adhered to smooth muscle membrane surfaces were visualized with T1-weighted 1H MRI and detected with 19F spectroscopy at 4.7T.

Drug Delivery With Therapeutic Nanoparticles
Targeted delivery of nanoparticles significantly enhanced the potency of both DXR and paclitaxel nanoparticles. Nontargeted DXR nanoparticles released drug rapidly during the first day of dissolution and slowly thereafter. Early day 1 release of DXR correlated with antiproliferative effects noted in culture for the nontargeted DXR nanoparticles, but these were not apparent for the paclitaxel formulations.

We hypothesize that effectiveness of therapeutic nanoparticles is dependent on their binding to and close apposition with the target membrane surface. Increased collisional interactions facilitated by ligand-directed binding likely promote the concomitant exchange of chemotherapeutic agents and lipids from the encapsulating monolayer to the target cell membranes. The transfer of membrane components between lipid vesicles and cell membranes has been well described and mathematically modeled by others,24,25 but this mechanism has not been effectively employed for drug delivery. Ordinarily, collision-mediated lipid exchange proceeds as a slow, concentration-dependent, second-order process26 of little consequence for circulating lipid particle systems. However, the present data suggest that direct binding of nanoparticles to cell surface receptors can increase collision-mediated lipid exchange efficiency by decreasing the activation energy barrier for the desorption of lipid molecules to the nearby cell membrane.27 In other words, ligand binding of the nanoparticles minimizes the equilibrium separation of surfaces and promotes the formation of collisional complexes with resultant interchange of lipids. The increased frequency and duration of these surface interactions can be expected to substantially enhance the net delivery of drug to the target cell.

A second element of nanoparticle drug-delivery mechanism is diffusion. The effectiveness of this release mechanism is also improved by the close proximity of the nanoparticle to the target cell. The contribution of this facet of the delivery mechanism is dependent on the chemical nature of the incorporated drug. Very hydrophobic drugs like paclitaxel are delivered less effectively by this route than are water-soluble compounds like DXR. Moreover, when hydrophobic compounds, like paclitaxel, diffuse from the nanoparticles into the surrounding extracellular interstitium, they may be better retained within the media and continue to inhibit proliferation or migration of neighboring cells.28

Molecular Imaging and Drug Quantification
Magnetic resonance molecular imaging and drug quantification are unique advantageous features of targeted therapeutic nanoparticles in comparison with other delivery approaches. We have reported that TF-targeted nanoparticles can be delivered locally after balloon overstretch injury, bound to VSMCs within the tunica media of porcine carotid arteries, and visualized with intravascular ultrasound.16,17 The recent rapid developments in interventional MRI for vascular imaging and coronary artery stent placement highlight the opportunities to use targeted paramagnetic nanoparticles to delineate the depth and breadth of vascular balloon injury as well as to confirm and to quantify the delivery of nanoparticle-based drug therapy.

Targeted paramagnetic nanoparticles are easily visualized with MRI even at clinical magnetic field strengths (1.5T).2123 This potent T1-weighted paramagnetic relaxivity stems from the high surface payloads of gadolinium chelates borne by each bound nanoparticle, which overcome the partial volume dilution effects that diminish the effectiveness of other targeted MR contrast agents. In the present study, TF-targeted nanoparticles bound to the surface of smooth muscle cells in culture occupy <1% of the imaging voxel volume yet produce a strong contrast signal. Moreover, by virtue of their perfluorocarbon core, the nanoparticles bound at a site can be detected in vitro, and in the future, they should be quantifiable with 19F MR spectroscopy in vivo.

Prevention of Restenosis After Percutaneous Revascularization
Recent successful eluting stent–based drug-delivery systems1315 confirm that local therapy with appropriate antiproliferative agents can prevent restenosis. Moreover, these data suggest that nanoparticle drug-delivery systems, releasing similar agents directly from within the injured tunica media, may be equally effective, particularly for vessels less amenable to stent placement. Moreover, the intramural release of antiproliferative therapy presents additional opportunity to develop new stent formulations designed to augment endothelial growth and accelerate intimal healing. Rapid reendothelization of the lumen lining combined with a dampened medial cellular response to stretch injury may be an effective therapeutic combination.

Limitations
The present study presents concepts for using targeted therapeutic nanoparticles in the prevention of restenosis, but further research will be required to demonstrate this technology in animal models. Although nanoparticles were targeted to TF to demonstrate the concept, in clinical application alternative smooth muscle cell or extracellular matrix epitopes present within the tunica media in abundance at the time of balloon injury may be better molecular targets.

Conclusions
Ligand-directed nanoparticle technology could provide an alternative avenue for delivery of antiproliferative agents to prevent restenosis after angioplasty. Uniquely, these targeted paramagnetic nanoparticles afford the added potential for high-resolution MR molecular imaging of vascular injury concomitant with local dosimetry of antiproliferative therapy.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health: National Cancer Institute (NCI) Unconventional Innovations Program (Dr Lanza, N01-CO-27031-16), the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (Dr Wickline, HL59865), and General Medical Sciences 2 (Dr Karukstis, R15 GM55911-02). The authors thank Dr Joseph J.H. Ackerman, Professor and Chairman, Department of Chemistry and Director of the Biomedical MR Laboratory at Washington University, for technical assistance and support (NCI Small Animal Research Program grant R24 CA83060).

Received May 1, 2002; revision received August 22, 2002; accepted August 24, 2002.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Reidy MA. A reassessment of endothelial injury and arterial lesion formation. Lab Invest. 1985; 53: 513–520.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Clowes AW, Clowes MM, Fingerle J, et al. Kinetics of cellular proliferation after arterial injury: V. Role of acute distension in the induction of smooth muscle proliferation. Lab Invest. 1989; 60: 360–364.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Lincoff A, Furst J, Ellis S, et al. Sustained local delivery of dexamethasone by a novel intravascular eluting stent to prevent restenosis in the porcine coronary injury model. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 29: 808–816.[Abstract]

4. Strecker E, Gabelmann A, Boos I, et al. Effect on intimal hyperplasia of dexamethasone released from coated metal stents compared with non-coated stents in canine femoral arteries. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1998; 21: 487–496.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Liu M, Anderson P, Luo J, et al. Local delivery of ethanol inhibits intimal hyperplasia in pig coronary arteries after balloon injury. Circulation. 1997; 96: 2295–2301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Axel D, Kunert W, Goggelmann C, et al. Paclitaxel inhibits arterial smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration in vitro and in vivo using local drug delivery. Circulation. 1997; 96: 636–645.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Kalinowski M, Tepe G, Schieber A, et al. Local administration of ramiprilat is less effective than oral ramipril in preventing restenosis after balloon angioplasty in an animal model. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999; 10: 1397–1404.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Nozawa Y, Matsuura N, Miyake H, et al. Effects of TH-142177 on angiotensin II-induced proliferation, migration and intracellular signaling in vascular smooth muscle cells and on neointimal thickening after balloon injury. Life Sci. 1999; 64: 2061–2067.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Oberhoff M, Herdeg C, Baumbach A, et al. Time course of smooth muscle cell proliferation after local drug delivery of low-molecular-weight heparin using a porous balloon catheter. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1997; 41: 268–274.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Song C, Labhasetwar V, Cui X, et al. Arterial uptake of biodegradable nanoparticles for intravascular local drug delivery: results with an acute dog model. J Controlled Release. 1998; 54: 201–211.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Suh H, Jeong B, Rathi R, et al. Regulation of smooth muscle cell proliferation using paclitaxel-loaded poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(lactide/glycolide) nanospheres. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998; 42: 331–338.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Valero F, Hamon M, Fournier C, et al. Intramural injection of biodegradable microspheres as a local drug-delivery system to inhibit neointimal thickening in a rabbit model of balloon angioplasty. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1998; 31: 513–519.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Sousa JE. Sustained suppression of neointimal proliferation by sirolimus-eluting stents: one-year angiographic and intravascular ultrasound follow-up. Circulation. 2001; 104: 2007–2011.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Sousa JE, Costa MA, Abizaid A, et al. Lack of neointimal proliferation after implantation of sirolimus-coated stents in human coronary arteries: a quantitative coronary angiography and three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 2001; 103: 192–195.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Rensing BJ. Coronary restenosis elimination with a sirolimus eluting stent: first European human experience with 6-month angiographic and intravascular ultrasonic follow-up. Eur Heart J. 2001; 22: 2125–2130.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Lanza GM, Abendschein DR, Hall CH, et al. In vivo molecular imaging of stretch-induced tissue factor in carotid arteries with ligand-targeted nanoparticles. J Am Soc Echo. 2000; 13: 608–614.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Lanza G, Abendschein D, Hall C, et al. Molecular imaging of stretch-induced tissue factor expression in carotid arteries with intravascular ultrasound. Invest Radiol. 2000; 35: 227–234.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Lanza G, Wallace K, Scott M, et al. A novel site-targeted ultrasonic contrast agent with broad biomedical application. Circulation. 1996; 94: 3334–3340.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Trissel LA, Xu QA, Gilbert DL. Compatibility and stability of paclitaxel combined with doxorubicin hydrochloride in infusion Solutions. Ann Pharmacother. 1998; 32: 1013–1016.[Abstract]

20. Alvarez-Cedron L, Sayalero M, Lanao J. High-performance liquid chromatography validated assay of doxorubicin in rat plasma and tissues. J Chromatogr B. 1999; 721: 271–278.[CrossRef]

21. Anderson SA, Rader RK, Westlin WF, et al. Magnetic resonance contrast enhancement of neovasculature with alpha(v)beta(3)-targeted nanoparticles. Magn Reson Med. 2000; 44: 433–439.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Yu X, Song S-K, Chen J, et al. High-resolution MRI characterization of human thrombus using a novel fibrin-targeted paramagnetic nanoparticle contrast agent. Magn Reson Med.;. 2000; 44: 867–872.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Flacke S, Fischer S, Scott M, et al. A novel MRI contrast agent for molecular imaging of fibrin: implications for detecting vulnerable plaques. Circulation. 2001; 104: 1280–1285.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Hernandez-Borrell J, Mas F, Puy J. A theoretical approach to describe monolayer-liposome lipid interaction. Biophys Chem. 1990; 36: 47–55.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Jahnig F. Lipid exchange between membranes. Biophys J. 1984; 46: 687–694.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Wimley W, Thompson T. Phosphatidylethanolamine enhances the concentration-dependent exchange of phospholipids between bilayers. Biochemistry. 1991; 30: 4200–4204.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Jones J, Thompson T. Spontaneous phosphatidylcholine transfer by collision between vesicles at high lipid concentration. Biochemistry. 1989; 28: 129–134.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Baumbach A, Herdeg C, Kluge M, et al. Local drug delivery: Impact of pressure, substance characteristics, and stenting on drug transfer into the arterial wall. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent. 1999; 47: 102–106.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
R. P. Choudhury and E. A. Fisher
Molecular Imaging in Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Inflammation
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, July 1, 2009; 29(7): 983 - 991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
P. M. Winter, A. H. Schmieder, S. D. Caruthers, J. L. Keene, H. Zhang, S. A. Wickline, and G. M. Lanza
Minute dosages of {alpha}{nu}{beta}3-targeted fumagillin nanoparticles impair Vx-2 tumor angiogenesis and development in rabbits
FASEB J, August 1, 2008; 22(8): 2758 - 2767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
T. Cyrus, H. Zhang, J. S. Allen, T. A. Williams, G. Hu, S. D. Caruthers, S. A. Wickline, and G. M. Lanza
Intramural Delivery of Rapamycin With {alpha}v{beta}3-Targeted Paramagnetic Nanoparticles Inhibits Stenosis After Balloon Injury
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, May 1, 2008; 28(5): 820 - 826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
X. Yang
Nano- and Microparticle-based Imaging of Cardiovascular Interventions: Overview
Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 340 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
P. M. Winter, A. M. Neubauer, S. D. Caruthers, T. D. Harris, J. D. Robertson, T. A. Williams, A. H. Schmieder, G. Hu, J. S. Allen, E. K. Lacy, et al.
Endothelial {alpha}{nu}{beta}3 Integrin-Targeted Fumagillin Nanoparticles Inhibit Angiogenesis in Atherosclerosis
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, September 1, 2006; 26(9): 2103 - 2109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
S. A. Wickline, A. M. Neubauer, P. Winter, S. Caruthers, and G. Lanza
Applications of Nanotechnology to Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, March 1, 2006; 26(3): 435 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
J. C. Henry, M. M. Bonar, P. N. Kearns, H. Cui, M. M. Mutchler, M. V. Martin, A. R. Orsini, H. L. Elford, C. A. Bush, J. L. Zweier, et al.
Inhibition of Ribonucleotide Reductase Reduces Neointimal Formation following Balloon Injury
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2005; 314(1): 70 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. B. Buxton, S. C. Lee, S. A. Wickline, M. Ferrari, and for the Working Group Members
Recommendations of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Nanotechnology Working Group
Circulation, December 2, 2003; 108(22): 2737 - 2742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. M. Winter, A. M. Morawski, S. D. Caruthers, R. W. Fuhrhop, H. Zhang, T. A. Williams, J. S. Allen, E. K. Lacy, J. D. Robertson, G. M. Lanza, et al.
Molecular Imaging of Angiogenesis in Early-Stage Atherosclerosis With {alpha}v{beta}3-Integrin-Targeted Nanoparticles
Circulation, November 4, 2003; 108(18): 2270 - 2274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
P. M. Winter, S. D. Caruthers, A. Kassner, T. D. Harris, L. K. Chinen, J. S. Allen, E. K. Lacy, H. Zhang, J. D. Robertson, S. A. Wickline, et al.
Molecular Imaging of Angiogenesis in Nascent Vx-2 Rabbit Tumors Using a Novel {alpha}{nu}{beta}3-targeted Nanoparticle and 1.5 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Cancer Res., September 15, 2003; 63(18): 5838 - 5843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. A. Wickline and G. M. Lanza
Nanotechnology for Molecular Imaging and Targeted Therapy
Circulation, March 4, 2003; 107(8): 1092 - 1095.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
106/22/2842    most recent
01.CIR.0000044020.27990.32v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lanza, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wickline, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lanza, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wickline, S. A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*DOXORUBICIN
*OLEIC ACID
*TAXOL
Related Collections
Right arrow Restenosis
Right arrow Cardiovascular imaging agents/Techniques
Right arrow Smooth muscle proliferation and differentiation
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Other Research