Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2002;106:2417-2418
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000037105.14195.B6
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohn, J. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cohn, J. N.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Failure
Related Collections
Right arrow Autonomic, reflex, and neurohumoral control of circulation
Right arrow Genomics
Right arrow Heart failure - basic studies
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2002;106:2417.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial

Sympathetic Nervous System in Heart Failure

Jay N. Cohn, MD

From the Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

Correspondence to Jay N. Cohn, MD, Cardiovascular Division, Mayo Mail Code 508, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455. E-mail cohnx001{at}umn.edu


Key Words: Editorials • nervous system, sympathetic • heart failure

For those who have comfortably accepted the mechanistic link between sympathetic nervous system activation and poor outcome in heart failure, the study by Brede et al1 in this issue of Circulation is a welcome confirmation. The authors appear to have demonstrated in a murine model that absence of sympathoinhibitory {alpha}2 adrenoreceptors is associated with overactive catecholamine release, aggressive remodeling of the left ventricle, worsening signs of heart failure, and shortened life expectancy. Provocatively, deletion polymorphism of the {alpha}2 receptor in patients with heart failure also appears to be associated with worse heart failure and poorer outcome.

See p 2491

One may, of course, quibble with some experimental shortcomings. The number of animals is small, and surgical mortality is neither addressed nor accounted for. The magnitude of circulating norepinephrine increase in the at-risk receptor-deficient mice is surprisingly modest. The clinical material has been assessed retrospectively from a database that is poorly described and not available for scrutiny. Furthermore, the experimental model of pressure overload from aortic banding bears little similarity to the syndrome of heart failure observed clinically. Nonetheless, the apparent link between poor outcome and {alpha}2 receptor dysfunction certainly provides support for an adverse effect of unfettered sympathetic stimulation on the progression of the syndrome. Indeed, our early observations of a relationship between plasma norepinephrine and mortality in heart failure,2 buttressed by the survival benefit of ß-blocker therapy3,4 appear to have been mechanistically validated.

Or have they? Nothing is simple when dealing with the {alpha}2 receptor. It has traditionally been recognized to have at least two functions: to mediate vasoconstriction peripherally and to inhibit sympathetic nervous system activity centrally. Brede and his associates1 in Wurzburg remind us of a less well-known effect of {alpha}2 agonists; they inhibit presynaptic release of norepinephrine in the tissue, in this instance isolated atria. Added to this complexity is the recognition that there are at least three {alpha}2 receptors, and in these experiments activity of the {alpha}2A and {alpha}2C receptors, but not the {alpha}2B receptors, was critical to preventing progression of the disease. Some of these subtype issues are still in need of clarification. For example, adverse effects were noted in the {alpha}2C knockout mice, despite the authors’ acknowledgment that {alpha}2C receptors by themselves do not play a major role in central regulation of sympathetic tone. Deletion of the {alpha}2C receptor appears to contribute to sympathetic overactivity only when combined with {alpha}2A receptor deficiency.5 Therefore, how would isolated {alpha}2C-receptor knockout lead to heightened sympathetic drive? Is it a regional tissue effect? Or is the adverse response related to an independent compensatory mechanism developed by animals coping with lifelong absence of the receptor? Such potential mechanistic, regional, and species issues make translation of these observations into the clinical arena hazardous at best.

The most troubling threats to the comfortable hypothesis of a pathophysiological sympathetic role are recent clinical observations. If enhanced sympathetic activity is contributing to progression of heart failure, then inhibitors of that sympathetic activity should produce a favorable effect. Alpha1-receptor activation should be a manifestation of this unwanted adrenergic stimulation, but selective {alpha}1 blockers, such as prazosin and doxazosin, do not slow progression of heart failure6 and are less effective than diuretics in preventing heart failure in hypertensive patients.7 Imidazoline receptors inhibit sympathetic activity centrally, and moxonidine strikingly reduces plasma norepinephrine levels in heart failure8 but has an adverse effect on morbidity and mortality.9 Thus, clinical trials do not necessarily support the suggestion that sympathetic overactivity is an evil in heart failure. In our original observations of patients with heart failure, we concluded that plasma norepinephrine was a marker for the severity of the disease, but not necessarily a contributor to that severity.2

What about ß-blockers? These drugs (except perhaps bucindolol)10 exert a remarkably favorable effect on mortality and morbidity in heart failure.3,4,11,12 Don’t these clinical trials confirm the benefit of blocking at least one arm of the sympathetic nervous system? Perhaps not. ß-blockers are potent inhibitors of renin production and produce profound reductions in plasma angiotensin II levels in patients with heart failure.13 The efficacy of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system in slowing progression of heart failure,14 renal failure,15 cerebrovascular disease,16 and atherosclerosis16 is now incontrovertible.

The concept of an adverse effect of chronic sympathetic stimulation on the progression of cardiovascular disease is therefore less secure today than it was a few years ago. The observations of Brede et al1 in receptor-deficient mice and in patients with heart failure should stimulate the study of additional experimental models and prospective clinical trials to confirm and extend these preliminary results. Indeed, if the clinical findings are confirmed, then {alpha}2 polymorphism could potentially serve as a guide to therapeutic decision-making. It is critical to future management and to research in heart failure to know which of the neurohormonal mechanisms implicated in cardiovascular disease progression should be inhibited. If the sympathetic nervous system is not one of them, then perhaps we should rejoice that the body’s design provided for down-regulation of adrenergic receptors during chronic stimulation to moderate its potential deleterious effects. A similar down-regulation of angiotensin II receptors might have spared us from the progressive cardiovascular disease syndromes that plague the world’s population.

Footnotes

The opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.

References

  1. Brede M, Wiesmann F, Jans R, et al. Feedback inhibition of catecholamine release by two different {alpha}2-adrenoceptor subtypes prevents progression of heart failure. Circulation. 2002; 106: 2491–2496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Cohn JN, Levine TB, Olivari MT, et al. Plasma norepinephrine as a guide to prognosis in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1984; 311: 819–823.[Abstract]
  3. The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS-II): a randomized trial. Lancet. 1999; 353: 9–13.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Merit-HF Study Group. Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure: Metoprolol CR/XL Randomised Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF). Lancet. 1999; 353: 2001–2007.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Hein L, Altman JD, Kobilka BK. Two functionally distinct {alpha}2-adrenergic receptors regulate sympathetic neurotransmission. Nature. 1999; 402: 181–184.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Cohn JN, Archibald DG, Ziesche S, et al. Effect of vasodilator therapy on mortality in chronic congestive heart failure: results of a Veterans Administration Cooperative Study (V-HeFT). N Engl J Med. 1986; 314: 1547–1552.[Abstract]
  7. ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients randomized to doxazosin vs chlorthalidone: the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT). JAMA. 2000; 283: 1967–1975.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Swedberg K, Bristow MR, Cohn JN, et al. Effects of sustained-release moxonidine, an imidazoline agonist, on plasma norepinephrine in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1797–1803.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Coats AJ. Heart Failure 99: the MOXCON story. Int J Cardiol. 1999; 71: 109–111.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. The Beta-Blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial Investigators. A trial of the beta-blocker bucindolol in patients with advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 1659–1667.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Packer M, Bristow MR, Cohn JN, et al. The effect of carvedilol on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334: 1349–1355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Packer M, Coats AJ, Fowler MB, et al. Effect on carvedilol on survival in severe chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 1651–1658.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Campbell DJ, Aggarwal A, Esler M, et al. ß-blockers, angiotensin II, and ACE inhibitors in patients with heart failure. Lancet. 2001; 358: 1609–1610.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. The SOLVD Investigators. Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325: 293–302.[Abstract]
  15. Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Bain RP, et al. The effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition on diabetic nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329: 1456–1462.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Yusuf S, Sleight P, Pogue J, et al. Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 145–153.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Related Article:

Feedback Inhibition of Catecholamine Release by Two Different {alpha}2-Adrenoceptor Subtypes Prevents Progression of Heart Failure
Marc Brede, Frank Wiesmann, Roland Jahns, Kerstin Hadamek, Carsten Arnolt, Stefan Neubauer, Martin J. Lohse, and Lutz Hein
Circulation 2002 106: 2491-2496. [Abstract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
G. Grassi, A. Vincenti, R. Brambilla, F. Q. Trevano, R. Dell'Oro, A. Ciro, G. Trocino, A. Vincenzi, and G. Mancia
Sustained Sympathoinhibitory Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Severe Heart Failure
Hypertension, November 1, 2004; 44(5): 727 - 731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. B. Adamson, A. L. Smith, W. T. Abraham, K. J. Kleckner, R. W. Stadler, A. Shih, M. M. Rhodes, and on behalf of the InSync III Model 8042 and Attain
Continuous Autonomic Assessment in Patients With Symptomatic Heart Failure: Prognostic Value of Heart Rate Variability Measured by an Implanted Cardiac Resynchronization Device
Circulation, October 19, 2004; 110(16): 2389 - 2394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
R. Latini, S. Masson, I. Anand, M. Salio, A. Hester, D. Judd, S. Barlera, A. P Maggioni, G. Tognoni, J. N Cohn, et al.
The comparative prognostic value of plasma neurohormones at baseline in patients with heart failure enrolled in Val-HeFT
Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2004; 25(4): 292 - 299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohn, J. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cohn, J. N.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Failure
Related Collections
Right arrow Autonomic, reflex, and neurohumoral control of circulation
Right arrow Genomics
Right arrow Heart failure - basic studies
Right arrowRelated Article